Next Article in Journal
People’s Values and Preferences about Meat Consumption in View of the Potential Environmental Impacts of Meat: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Summary of Year-One Effort of the RCMI Consortium to Enhance Research Capacity and Diversity with Data Science
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prediction of Particulate Concentration Based on Correlation Analysis and a Bi-GRU Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph20010287
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence of Antibiotic Use and Disposal at Household Level in Informal Settlements of Kisumu, Kenya

by
Kellen J. Karimi
1,2,*,
Aijaz Ahmad
1,3,
Adriano Duse
1,3,
Mutuku Mwanthi
2 and
Richard Ayah
2
1
Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
2
Department of Public and Global Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi P.O. Box 19676-00202, Kenya
3
Infection Control, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(1), 287; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010287
Submission received: 22 October 2022 / Revised: 8 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 24 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Environmental and Public Health)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The use and abuse of antibiotics are directly related to the development of drug resistance, a global public health problem. Whereas the majority of research focus is on the use and misuse of antibiotics in drug resistance development, little is known about improper disposal, as a source of contamination in the environment that includes groundwater, especially in informal settlements. This study sought to determine antibiotic use and disposal in informal settlements in Kisumu, Kenya. A random cross-sectional sample of 447 households in selected informal settlements of Kisumu, Kenya was studied. A structured questionnaire was issued to persons heading households. The prevalence of antibiotic use was 43% (n = 193). Among these people, 74% (n = 144) had consulted a health worker in a healthcare facility for a prescription. Respondents did not always complete doses but kept the remainder for the next time they would become ill (54%). About 32% disposed of the remainder of the antibiotics in pit latrines and compost pits (10%) while 4% disposed through burning. Antibiotic use was fairly high despite a low level of awareness of the health effects of consuming water contaminated with antibiotics (35%) (n = 156); p = 0.03. Misuse and inappropriate disposal of antibiotics as identified may lead to a higher risk of antibiotic resistance, increasing the disease burden in the informal settlements.

1. Introduction

Bacterial infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Antibiotics continue to be a low-cost solution to current human and animal health problems both in treatment and prophylaxis [1,2]. They improve health outcomes, along with improved water and sanitation, nutrition, and vaccination [3]. The positive gains, however, are offset by rising antimicrobial resistance, which is facilitated by increased antibiotic consumption, with many low- and middle-income countries lacking the capacity to conduct surveillance [3]. According to the World Health Organization, approximately 50% of antibiotics consumed are unnecessary [4], resulting in antibiotic effectiveness being compromised owing to resistance [5,6,7]. Individual patients’ antibiotic use is defined as when they receive the correct medicine for the appropriate indication, in doses that match their individual requirements for a specified period of time, and with the correct information [8]. Irrational antibiotic use, on the other hand, occurs when any of the predefined conditions are not met, or when the existing algorithm for determining the presence of infection among patients to warrant a prescription is not followed [6].
Antibiotic consumption increased by 39% globally between 2000 and 2015 [9]. Consumption rates were found to be high in North America, Europe, and the Middle East [3]. Consumption is lower in low- and middle-income countries, despite the fact that the bacterial disease burden that causes death is higher in low-income countries [10,11,12], but the LMICs are catching up and may soon register rates comparable to high-income countries [9]. Global consumption rates were reported to have increased by 46% overall [3].
Antibiotic use has been prevalent in hospital settings, where treatment guidelines recommend optimal antibiotic use in order to reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance, which worsens the burden of infectious diseases [12,13]. Antibiotic use has been reported in low- and middle-income countries, both in hospital settings [14] and in communities where misuse is common, with the majority preferring self-medication [15]. Misuse is largely fuelled by the ease of obtaining antibiotics without a prescription, a scenario described as less time-consuming, less expensive, and more convenient than visiting health facilities for a medical review [15]. In Kenya, an antibiotic consumption study was conducted in an informal settlement in Nairobi, where the prevalence of antibiotic use was found to be high (87% (initial survey) and 70% (follow-up survey)). This happened in addition to a lack of understanding about effective antibiotic use. [14].
The World Health Organization reported the prevalence of antibiotic consumption in defined daily dosages for four Sub-Saharan African countries: the Republic of Tanzania, Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, and Burundi, with defined daily dosages of 27.3, 13.8, 10.7, and 4.4 per 1000 inhabitants per day, respectively [16]. However, no data on antibiotic usage have been reported in Kenya, making it impossible to implement the set antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance guidelines [17].
Antibiotics are used for the treatment of infection and for prophylaxis among different populations [18], especially persons living with HIV patients, who use co-trimoxazole (sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim) for prophylaxis and treatment of related infections [19]. For instance, among HIV patients, the World Health Organization recommends initiation of co-trimoxazole in patients with HIV clinical disease (stages 3 and 4) and/or a CD4+ cell count of ≤350 cells [19,20]. With the threat of antibiotic resistance, HIV patients are at risk of experiencing side effects that might lead to an increased burden of disease and death.
Antibiotic misuse has been categorized as both community- and healthcare-provider-driven owing to a lack of understanding and awareness of the dangers of antibiotic abuse in the community, availability of antibiotics without a prescription, and consumption of leftover medications, even though prescibers and dispensers were found to have adequate knowledge on antibiotic use [7,21]. The leftover antibiotics are available because patients are unable to complete the medication provided to them for a variety of reasons that vary from person to person, such as adverse effects, feeling better, or drug expiry [22,23]. Predictors of antibiotic misuse among healthcare providers include pharmacists’ and prescribers’ knowledge, attitude, and practice, patient/doctor contact, a lack of rapid diagnostic tests, pharmaceutical promotion, and a lack of adequate antibiotic education for healthcare professionals [7,21].
Environmental contamination with antibiotics has been linked to a number of sources, including pit latrines, sewage, wastewater, and animal and hospital waste disposal [24,25,26,27,28]. Other sources of groundwater contamination include industrial waste, agricultural runoff, and floods, which are distressing to the locals of these settlements studied and are linked to the shallow aquifer [29]. Antibiotics are becoming more and more prevalent in the environment, but it is unclear how they are used and disposed of in homes, given that they are present in water and what role they play in unintentional exposure [30]. To prevent environmental pollution, which fosters the development of antibiotic resistance, it is critical to properly and safely dispose of any unused drugs [18].
An increased urban population has resulted in the expansion of informal settlements, which has a negative influence on water supplies [31]. Residents of informal communities must consequently balance the scarcity with readily available groundwater by sinking shallow wells [32]. As the technology required to make water safe may not be readily available to informal settlement dwellers, groundwater may be consumed without being subjected to any type of treatment owing to its clean appearance. Residents who are unaware of the presence of antibiotics in their drinking water may be at risk of exposure.
Since there exists a complex interaction between humans, animals, and the environment [33], health protection in a contaminated environment is critical. This strategy will attempt to attain optimal health while also addressing the future global antibiotic resistance burden, particularly in informal settlements [34]. This paper examines antibiotic use and disposal in informal settlement households.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in Kisumu County, which is located in Kenya’s western area, 350 km from the capital city of Nairobi, at longitudes 33°20’ E and latitudes 0°20’ S and 0°50’ S [35]. Kisumu has a total land area of 2086 km2, of which roughly 567 km2 is water. The county is located on the beaches of Lake Victoria, the world’s third-biggest freshwater lake, which also borders Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania. The research sites are located in the Kisumu East and Kisumu Central sub-counties. There are eight informal settlements in the county, five of which were studied: Obunga, Manyatta A, Manyatta B, Nyalenda A, and Nyalenda B.
The population density of the informal settlements is projected to be 567,983 [36], with an annual urbanization rate of 2.8 percent [36]. The population in informal settlements relies on groundwater to supply their residential water needs while also using the sub-surface for sanitation facilities. The majority use pit latrines [32].
A cross-section of households in the chosen informal settlements was studied in September 2019. The AF-RIWATSAN project site, which included a number of components, was purposively selected [37]. Prior to the study, groundwater sources were mapped, and a sample of homes was selected at random, based on the population of each informal settlement around the identified groundwater sources [38]. A sample size of 442 households was determined. A proportionate distribution of homes was used, depending on the population of each of the five (5) informal settlements in the study area, namely Manyatta A and B, Nyalenda A and B, and Obunga, as reported by the Kenya Bureau of Statistics, to guarantee that each was sufficiently sampled. This ensured that more participants were drawn from more populous informal settlements, and vice versa. One individual from each home was chosen as the head to be involved in the study and interviewed after providing informed consent. The first household was chosen based on its proximity to the informal settlement’s administrative leadership, being the one on the right-hand side of the chief’s office. Every fifth family was chosen and included in the sample until the determined sample size [39] of 442 households was achieved.
A structured questionnaire was administered by trained interviewers using the Swahili language which was understood by the respondents. To verify that the translation from English to Swahili was not lost, the validity of the questions was maintained, and the possibility for introducing information bias was reduced, the questionnaire was piloted among residents of a different informal community within Kisumu. Groundwater use and the use of antibiotics were outcome variables. Sociodemographic traits, the source of the antibiotics, the completion of the antibiotic dose, and the disposal of leftover drugs were all predictor variables. Version 20 of IBM* SPSS* Statistics was used to enter the data, and also conduct descriptive analysis and cross tabulations whereas STATA 14 was used for logistic regression analysis. Continuous data were summarized using descriptive statistics, whilst associations and linkages in categorical variables were evaluated using chi-square tests. To find predictors of antibiotic use, logistic regression analysis was utilized.
Ethical clearance to conduct this research was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg South Africa (HREC. Protocol Number M190412); the Kenyatta National Hospital and University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee (KNH/UoN-ERC. Ref. No. P71910/2018); and the National Commission for Science and Technology and Innovation. Ref No. NACOSTI/P/19/3232/28732). To protect privacy, study areas were coded.

3. Results

3.1. Participant Information

In the five informal communities, 447 households were investigated. Of these, 75% (n = 337) of responders were female, whereas 25% (n = 110) were male. Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, including their gender, age, place of residence, and HIV status. The majority of the female responders were under the age of 45 (79%). The respondents’ minimum age was 24 and their maximum age was 80. Manyatta A had the most participants (32.1%), followed by Nyalenda A (21.4%), Nyalenda B (21.2%), Manyatta B (19.9%), and Obunga (5.4%). As HIV affects the immune system, making people more susceptible to infections and, as a result, to increased antibiotic use, we needed to know the HIV status of the respondents; only around 5% of the participants were HIV positive.

3.2. Prevalence of Antibiotic Use

Antibiotic use in the selected households during the previous month from the day of the interview was reported to be 43%. (193). Among individuals who consumed antibiotics, 70% (n = 137) reported getting the antibiotic through a prescription, whereas the rest did not consult a doctor for the antibiotic prescription. Further examination in the households that reported self-medication revealed that antibiotics were either used based on previous experience (76%) or on the advice of friends (26%).
Additionally, the level of awareness of the health implications of drinking antibiotic-contaminated water was evaluated and it was discovered that only 35% (n = 158; p = 0.003) of households who reported using antibiotics were aware of the health risks of drinking antibiotic-contaminated water. Table 2 summarizes an in-depth examination of the distribution of antibiotic sources based on the characteristics of the respondents. Remarkably, a large proportion (87.5%) of HIV + respondents received a prescription from a medical practitioner for antibiotics taken. In terms of different settlement areas, a relatively small percentage of respondents in Manyatta B obtained an antibiotic prescription from a medical practitioner, which could explain the substantial difference seen (p < 0.000) among informal settlements.
Furthermore, to comprehend the amount of health consciousness The odds of employing antibiotics were calculated using a 95% confidence interval, and no statistically significant difference was observed (Table 3). Female individuals had higher odds of using antibiotics than male participants, with an odds ratio of 1.33; z = 1.24, SE = 0.3105, p > 0.05. Interestingly, the odds of using antibiotics were shown to be lower among HIV-positive participants than among HIV-negative participants (0.313; z = −1.73, SE = 0.2097, p > 0.05). Participants aged 45 years and older showed a higher likelihood of using antibiotics compared to younger participants (odds ratio = 1.54, z = 1.22, SE = 0.550, p > 0.05). In terms of geographical location, the situation differs among different settlements, with the use of antibiotics decreasing in only one informal settlement (Nyalenda B) (odds ratio =0.42). z = 1.07, SEM = 1.726156, the observations were judged to be within one standard deviation of the mean.

3.3. Antibiotic Disposal

Proper disposal of leftover antibiotics is regarded as a major concern and has been linked to the development of antibiotic resistance. In this study, all participants were interviewed about the various methods they disposed of leftover medicines. Respondents disposed of antibiotics in a variety of methods, including 51.6% (n = 16) in pit latrines, 16.1% (n = 5) in compost pits, and 6.5% (n = 2) by burning. However, the majority of respondents (87.1%; n = 27) did not discard the unfinished antibiotics but preserved them for future use (Table 4). Antibiotic completion analysis revealed that females completed their antibiotic doses more than males.
A statistically significant difference in HIV status was observed, (p = 0.000), with the majority of HIV-positive respondents completing their antibiotic dose and just a tiny fraction of HIV-negative respondents not completing their antibiotic dose. There was also a difference among the informal settlements (p = 0.001), with a lower proportion of responders in Nyalenda B completing their antibiotic doses than in the other settlements. In terms of age group variations, it was discovered that antibiotic completion rose with age, although there were no significant differences in antibiotic dose completion across the various age groups (Table 4).

3.4. Ground Water Use

Since improper disposal of unfinished antibiotics contaminates groundwater, it was critical to examine groundwater use in the selected settlements. As expected, more than 99% of respondents reported using groundwater for various household reasons (Table 5). While the majority of groundwater was reported to be used for washing clothes (96%), cleaning houses (95%), and washing utensils (78%), the same water was also seen to be utilized for drinking (9%) and cooking (18%) purposes. In terms of gender, a greater proportion of male respondents (12.6%) reported drinking groundwater than the opposite sex. HIV-positive subjects (19%) reported drinking from groundwater, but HIV-negative participants (8.9%) did not. Residents of the Manyatta B and Nyalenda B informal settlements were more likely to use groundwater for drinking than residents of the other settlements. We discovered that younger people did not drink groundwater, but that drinking groundwater increased with age. As water use is ubiquitous, no significant difference was found when comparing participant characteristics.

4. Discussion

Lack of accurate diagnosis, combined with self-medication, is a rising global problem that leads to antibiotic abuse, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Antibiotic use was reported to be 43% among Kisumu County residents living in informal settlements. However, an entry and exit survey on antibiotic use in an urban informal settlement discovered a high prevalence of antibiotic use at 87% (entry) and 70% (exit) [14]. Antibiotic use in these informal settlements is higher than the level reported in Europe in 2016, where 34% were reported to have used antibiotics [40]. In this study, the majority (70%) of antibiotic users in informal settlements obtained the medication on a prescription, but some also obtained the medication after seeking advice from friends for advice. Other participants utilized leftover antibiotics from a previous experience and some obtained the antibiotics after doing an online search for the symptoms and going directly to a chemist. This is comparable to a comprehensive investigation conducted in Uganda, where it was revealed that self-medication is common in low-income countries, with an overall prevalence of 38.8% for different ailments [41]. Self-medication was viewed as more convenient, less expensive, and less time-consuming than getting a prescription from a medical facility [15]. Antibiotics were saved for future use from a variety of sources, including pharmacies, leftover doses, and drug sharing, with education, age, gender, previous successful usage, the severity of illness, and income identified as factors influencing the behavior [15,41]. In another study, despite legal requirements that antibiotics be dispensed only with a prescription, antibiotics were obtained without a prescription, owing to increased access and poor enforcement of the legislation [15]. Antibiotic overuse is exacerbated by the ease with which antibiotics can be obtained without a prescription; however, there is a scarcity of information on antibiotic use and/or misuse in Kenya [17]. This study did not determine whether the correct dosage was administered in order to determine dosage compliance, which is an important factor that should be investigated further.
Self-medication with antibiotics is a major contributor to the development of drug resistance [41] and is typically conducted for the user’s convenience, resulting in antibiotic misuse [35]. Self-medication was found to be common in southern and eastern European countries with high levels of antibiotic resistance [42]. It has also been observed that the availability of leftover antibiotics is a key contributor to the habit of self-medication [43]. There is a need to develop a rigorous data collection system for antibiotic usage as well as to raise awareness about the health implications of antibiotic exposure in the environment, including groundwater.
An estimated 60% of Kisumu inhabitants live in informal settlements, where they face deficiencies such as a lack of clean water and basic sanitation [38]. Groundwater is utilized for household reasons by 99.8% of the people in these settlements, including cooking, drinking, washing utensils, washing clothes, and cleaning the house. This study supports the findings of a review of groundwater used for drinking in south-east Asia and the Pacific, which found that the average proportion of families using groundwater for drinking is high (66% (range of 22–95%) in urban areas and 60% (range of 17–93%) in rural regions) [44]. Okotto et al. (2015) discovered that an estimated 472m3 of groundwater was extracted but was used for other domestic purposes than drinking and cooking in the Kisumu informal settlements [45]. Another study in Kiambu County, Kenya, investigated the extent of groundwater use for domestic and irrigation purposes and discovered that residents perceived groundwater to be contaminated, with only 36.7 percent of households using groundwater for domestic purposes and 13.3% using it for irrigation [46].
The improper disposal of unused, stored, and expired antibiotics is of major concern [47], as users may be unaware of suitable disposal measures [48]. Antibiotics contaminate groundwater in a variety of ways, including direct dumping with rubbish, faeces and urine excretion, and hospital and industrial waste [1,28,49,50]. The same pattern was found in this study, where respondents reported disposing of antibiotics in pit latrines, compost pits, or burning. Pit latrines have been reported to be the most commonly used form of sanitation in facilities in informal communities [51]. However, other causes of water contamination have been identified, including industrial, agricultural, and flooding [46], which create calamity when it rains owing to the study area’s shallow water table [29]. However, several respondents did not discard the antibiotic but saved it for future use. Antibiotic usage has been linked to an increase in the likelihood of incorrect disposal into the environment [52]. Keeping the remainder of antibiotics for use the next time a person becomes ill is risky since there is a chance that the antibiotics will expire. The efficacy and potency of the antibiotics are compromised and are bound to fail to treat the intended infection [53]. They are also harmful and likely to lead to toxicity that may lead to irreversible damage to body organs [54]. Unfortunately, antibiotic resistance caused by poor antibiotic disposal is hardly addressed and is not a priority even among healthcare practitioners [52]. The literature has demonstrated that contamination of groundwater sources is higher in places with a high population density [55], which is a typical feature in informal settlements, but information on antibiotic usage and disposal in informal settlements has not been documented.
People with weakened immune systems use antibiotics the most to combat opportunistic infections. In this study, the self-reported HIV status was 4.7%, with a higher likelihood of utilizing antibiotics and completing their antibiotic dosage. This study’s location is in a region in Kenya where the HIV prevalence is greater than the national prevalence, which has been reported to be between 16.3% [56] and 17.5% [57]. An estimated 60% of Kisumu inhabitants live in informal settlements, where they face deficiencies such as a lack of access to services such as clean water and good sanitation [38]. The environment harbours resources such as groundwater, which serves as a complement to intermittent water supply for residential use, and it is critical that initiatives aimed at educating people living in informal settlements about the dangers of consuming unclean water are implemented [58]. As a result of knowing the HIV burden in the study region, knowing it follows that protecting the environment from antibiotic contamination is a key step in promoting human well-being in the one health setting. This study describes findings from a Kenyan informal settlement; however, it is well known that informal communities around the world face similar difficulties of access to essential amenities. The findings indicate that countries have a responsibility to carry out the global antimicrobial resistance action plan.

5. Implications for Policy and Areas for Further Research

Despite attempts to raise awareness about antibiotic usage and resistance through worldwide annual events, consumers still lack reliable knowledge about proper antibiotic use. To reduce misuse and abuse, it is critically important to design methods that assure measurement of antibiotic consumption by countries and use thereof at individual and household levels.
More research on prescribers’ and users’ knowledge of the amount of use and health impacts as a result of antibiotic exposure in the environment owing to inadequate disposal, should be conducted. It is also necessary to devote time to improving understanding through surveillance and study. These measures will reduce the disease burden and promote well-being, particularly in informal settlements, which have similar cross-cutting inequities.
Antibiotic disposal practices in informal communities have been found to pollute the environment, including groundwater; the result being environmentally induced antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic use reduction and correct disposal are strategies for combating antibiotic resistance in groundwater. Governments, as well as other relevant organizations and stakeholders, should prioritize the provision of safe water for all, particularly disadvantaged residents of informal settlements. Proper disposal techniques must be prioritized, and hence raising awareness about these among prescribers, providers, and antibiotic consumers should be a top concern.

Limitations

Since this was an academic study with restricted resources, a large sample could not be studied. However, the study’s findings are applicable to and can be generalized to similar settings, because informal settlements have traits that are not necessarily unique to a particular geographical area. To look for differences between informal settlements, a different study approach than descriptive is recommended. For reason that the study was dependent on the response given, the actual HIV status of the respondents may not have been captured. A study targeting HIV patients at the clinic could be a better measure of the burden of disease among the informal settlements, and thus more concrete conclusions could be made on antibiotic use among HIV patients.

6. Conclusions

In Kenya, there is little information on antibiotic use at the household level. This study discovered that antibiotic use is significantly high, with disposal procedures similar to those known to contribute to environmental contamination, including groundwater. There was antibiotic misuse and abuse, as well as improper disposal, along with a lack of awareness of the health risks of antibiotic exposure in the environment, such as drinking antibiotic-contaminated water. The majority of informal settlement dwellers rely on groundwater to fulfill their water demands. As a result, there is a need for studies to increase surveillance of antibiotic usage and disposal. Additionally, governments and other relevant organizations must strengthen their commitment to groundwater resource management in order to offer sustainable universal water distribution free from the inclusion of pollutants such as antibiotics, particularly among disadvantaged communities in informal settlements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.J.K.; Data curation, K.J.K.; Formal analysis, K.J.K.; Investigation, K.J.K.; Methodology, K.J.K., A.A., A.D., M.M. and R.A.; Project administration, K.J.K.; Supervision, A.A., A.D. and M.M.; Writing—original draft, K.J.K.; Writing—review and editing, K.J.K., A.A., A.D., M.M. and R.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). CARTA is jointly led by the African Population and Health Research Center and the University of the Witwatersrand and funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (Grant No. G-19-57145), Sida (Grant No: 54100113), Uppsala Monitoring Center, Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), and by the Wellcome Trust (reference no. 107768/Z/15/Z) and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, with support from the Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science in Africa (DELTAS Africa) programme. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the Fellow. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical clearance to conduct research was obtained from three institutions as follows: the Health Research Ethic Committee of the university of the Witwatersrand (HREC. Protocol Number M190412); the Kenyatta National Hospital and University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee (KNH/UoN-ERC. Ref No. P71910/2018); and the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (Ref No. NACOSTI/P/19/3232/28732).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed Consent to participate in the study was obtained from the study participants before the interview was conducted. The study participants signed an informed consent form.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request due to the privacy of the respondents. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Data are not publicly available due since this is an academic study and some of the data are still being analyzed for publication.

Acknowledgments

We would like to appreciate the respondents in the households among informal settlements in Kisumu County, i.e., (OBG, MN A and B, and NY A and B) for giving consent to conduct the study. We are indebted to the dedication of the research assistants led by Francis Omondi. We also appreciate Janet Musia for her input in data entry, management, and analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Danner, M.; Robertson, A.; Behrends, V.; Reiss, J. Antibiotic pollution in surface fresh waters: Occurrence and effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 664, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Carvalho, I.T.; Santos, L. Antibiotics in the aquatic environments: A review of the European scenario. Environ. Int. 2016, 94, 736–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Browne, A.J.; Chipeta, M.G.; Haines-woodhouse, G.; Kumaran, E.P.A.; Hamadani, B.H.K.; Zaraa, S.; Hay, S.I.; Dolecek, C. Global antibiotic consumption and usage in humans, 2000—18: A spatial modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 2000, 5, e893–e904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption: 2016–2018 Early Implementation; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Corbel, V.; Stankiewicz, M.; Pennetier, C.; Fournier, D.; Stojan, J.; Girard, E.; Dimitrov, M.; Molgó, J.; Hougard, J.-M.; Lapied, B. Evidence for inhibition of cholinesterases in insect and mammalian nervous systems by the insect repellent deet. BMC Biol. 2009, 7, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Zetts, R.M.; Stoesz, A.; Smith, B.A.; Hyun, D.Y. Outpatient Antibiotic Use and the Need for Increased Antibiotic Stewardship Efforts. Pediatrics 2021, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Machowska, A.; Lundborg, C.S. Drivers of Irrational Use of Antibiotics in Europe. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Paterson, I.K.; Hoyle, A.; Ochoa, G.; Baker-austin, C.; Taylor, N.G.H. Optimising Antibiotic Usage to Treat Bacterial Infections. Nat. Publ. Gr. 2016, 6, 37853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Klein, E.Y.; Van Boeckel, T.P.; Martinez, E.M.; Pant, S.; Gandra, S.; Levin, S.A.; Goossens, H.; Laxminarayan, R. Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 3463–3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. GBD 2019 Viewpoint Collaborators Five insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020, 396, 1135–1159. [CrossRef]
  11. World Health Organization (WHO). World Health Organization Fact Sheet_The top 10 Causes of Death_ 2020; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhattarai, S.; Sharma, K.; Subedi, N.; Ranabhat, S.; Baral, M.P. Burden of Serious Bacterial Infections and Multidrug- Resistant Organisms in an Adult Population of Nepal: A Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling Informed Mortality Surveillance of Community and Hospital Deaths. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73 (Suppl. S5), 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maina, M.; Mcknight, J.; Tosas-, O.; Schultsz, C.; English, M. Using treatment guidelines to improve antibiotic use: Insights from an antibiotic point prevalence survey in Kenya. BMJ Glob. Health 2021, 6, e003836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Omulo, S.; Thumbi, S.M.; Lockwood, S.; Verani, J.R.; Bigogo, G.; Masyongo, G.; Call, D.R. Evidence of superficial knowledge regarding antibiotics and their use: Results of two cross- sectional surveys in an urban informal settlement in Kenya. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Do, N.T.T.; Vu, H.T.L.; Nguyen, C.T.K.; Punpuing, S.; Khan, W.A.; Gyapong, M.; Asante, K.P. Community-based antibiotic access and use in six low-income and middle-income countries: A mixed-method approach. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 9, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Report on Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Global Antibiotic Resistance Parnership. Situation Analysis and Recommendations: Antibiotic Use and Resistance in Kenya. Washington, DC and New Delhi: Center for Disease Dynamics. In Economics & Policy; Global Antibiotic Resistance Parnership; Kenya Working group: Nairobi, Kenya, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  18. Angi, S.A.; Bukachi, S.A. Household Knowledge and Perceptions on Disposal Practices of Unused Medicines in Kenya Household Knowledge and Perceptions on Disposal Practices of Unused Medicines in Kenya. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 2016, 4, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bwakura-dangarembizi, M.; Sc, M.; Kendall, L.; Sc, M.; Bakeera-, S.; Nahirya-ntege, P.; Med, M.; Keishanyu, R.; Med, M.; Nathoo, K.; et al. Europe PMC Funders Group Europe PMC Funders Author Manuscripts A Randomized Trial of Prolonged Co-trimoxazole in HIV-Infected Children in Africa. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Walker, A.S.; Ford, D.; Gilks, C.F.; Munderi, P.; Ssali, F.; Reid, A.; Katabira, E.; Grosskurth, H.; Mugyenyi, P.; Hakim, J.; et al. Daily co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected adults in Africa started on combination antiretroviral therapy: An observational analysis of the DART cohort. Lancet 2010, 375, 1278–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Nkinda, L.; Kilonzi, M.; Felix, F.F.; Mutagonda, R.; Myemba, D.T.; Mwakawanga, D.L.; Kibwana, U.; Njiro, B.J.; Ndumwa, H.P.; Mwakalukwa, R.; et al. Drivers of irrational use of antibiotics among children: A mixed method study among prescribers and dispensers in Tanzania. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2022, 22, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kristina, S.A.; Wiedyaningsih, C.; Cahyadi, A.; Ridwan, B.A. A Survey on Medicine Disposal Practice among Households in Yogyakarta. Asian J. Pharm. 2018, 2018, 955–958. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sivasankaran, P.; Mohammed, E.B.; Ganesan, N.; Durai, R. Storage and Safe Disposal of Unwanted/Unused and Expired Medicines: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Survey among Indian Rural Population. J. Young Pharm. 2019, 11, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kimani-Murage, E.W.; Ngindu, A.M. Quality of water the slum dwellers use: The case of a Kenyan slum. J. Urban Health 2007, 84, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, Q.L.; Li, H.; Zhou, X.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Su, J.Q.; Zhang, X.; Huang, F.Y. An underappreciated hotspot of antibiotic resistance: The groundwater near the municipal solid waste landfill. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 609, 966–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Matongo, S.; Birungi, G.; Moodley, B.; Ndungu, P. Pharmaceutical residues in water and sediment of Msunduzi River, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Chemosphere 2015, 134, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. World Health Organization (WHO). Pharmaceuticals in Drinking-Water; no. WHO/HSE/WSH/11.05; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  28. Okotto-okotto, J.; Okotto, L.; Price, H.; Pedley, S.; Wright, J. A Longitudinal Study of Long-Term Change in Contamination Hazards and Shallow Well Quality in Two Neighbourhoods of. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 2014, 4275–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Othoo, C.O.; Dulo, S.O.; Olago, D.O.; Ayah, R. Effects of Shallow Water Table on the Construction of Pit Latrines and Shallow Wells in the Informal Settlements of Kisumu City. Sanit. Value Chain. 2020, 4, 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, H.; Wang, N.; Wang, B.; Zhao, Q.; Fang, H.; Fu, C.; Tang, C.; Jiang, F.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. Antibiotics in Drinking Water in Shanghai and Their Contribution to Antibiotic Exposure of School Children. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 2692–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Avis, W.R. Urban Governance (Topic Guide); GSDRC, University of Birmingham: Birmingham, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kanoti, J.R.; Olago, D.; Opiyo, N.; Nyamai, C. An overview of groundwater and sanitation challenges in Kisumu City, Kenya. Int. J. Innov. Res. Dev. 2019, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davis, M.F.; Rankin, S.C.; Schurer, J.M.; Cole, S.; Conti, L.; Rabinowitz, P.; Gray, G.; Kahn, L.; Machalaba, C.; Mazet, J.; et al. Checklist for One Health Epidemiological Reporting of Evidence (COHERE). One Health 2017, 4, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ministry of Health. National Policy on Prevention and Containment of Antimicribial Resistance, Kenya; Ministry of Health: Nairobi, Kenya, 2017; p. 7.
  35. Kisumu, C.G. Kisumu County Integrated Development Plan II, 2018-2022; County Government of Kisumu: Kisumu, Kenya, 2018.
  36. Statistics, N.B. 2019 Kenya Population and Housng Census Volume IV: Distribution of Population by Socio-Economic Characteristics; Kenya National Bureau of Statistics: Nairobi, Kenya, 2019; ISSN 978-9966-102-11-9.
  37. Kanoti, J.R.; Olago, D.; Opiyo, N.; Nyamai, C.; Dulo, S.; Ayah, R. Microbial and Physical Chemical Indicators of Groundwater Contamination in Kenya: A Case Study of Kisumu Aquifer System, Kenya. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2019, 11, 404–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Maoulidi, M. Kisumu Millenium Development Goals Multi-Sector Household Survey; Millenium Cities Initiative; Earth Institute, Columbia University: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pourhoseingholi, M.A.; Vahedi, M.; Rahimzadeh, M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2013, 6, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  40. European Union. Special Eurobarometer 445-April 2016 Report “Antimicrobial Resistance” Survey requested by the European Commission; European Union; European Commission; Directorate–General for Health and Food Safety and coordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2016; ISBN 978-92-79-58818-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ocan, M.; Obuku, E.A.; Bwanga, F.; Akena, D.; Richard, S. Household antimicrobial self-medication: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in developing countries. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Rajendran, A.; Kulirankal, K.; Rakesh, P.; George, S. Prevalence and pattern of antibiotic self-medication practice in an urban population of Kerala, India: A cross-sectional study. Indian J. Community Med. 2019, 44, 42–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Grigoryan, L.; Monnet, D.L.; Haaijer-Ruskamp, F.M.; Bonten, M.J.M.; Lundborg, S.; Verheij, T.J.M. Self-medication with antibiotics in Europe: A case for action. Curr. Drug Saf. 2010, 5, 329–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Carrard, N.; Foster, T.; Juliet, W. Groundwater as a source of drinking water in Southeast asia- Am multi-country review 2019.pdf. Water J. 2019, 11, 1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Okotto, L.; Okotto-Okotto, J.; Price, H.; Pedley, S.; Wright, J. Socio-economic aspects of domestic groundwater consumption, vending and use in Kisumu, Kenya. Appl. Geogr. 2015, 58, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mensah, A.K.; Kissi, E.A.; Krah, K.; Mireku, O.D. The extent of groundwater use for domestic and irrigation activities in Thiririka sub-catchment, Gatundu South District, Kiambu County, Kenya. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 9, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Medicines Strtegy Countries at the Core 2004–2007; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bashaar, M.; Thawani, V.; Hassali, M.A.; Saleem, F. Disposal practices of unused and expired pharmaceuticals among general public in Kabul. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Graham, J.P.; Polizzotto, M.L. Review Pit Latrines and Their Impacts on Groundwater Quality: A Systematic Review. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Sanganyado, E.; Gwenzi, W. Science of the Total Environment Antibiotic resistance in drinking water systems: Occurrence, removal, and human health risks. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 669, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mutyambizi, C.; Mokhele, T.; Ndinda, C.; Hongoro, C. Access to and Satisfaction with Basic Services in Informal Settlements: Results from a Baseline Assessment Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Anwar, M.; Iqbal, Q.; Saleem, F. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Improper disposal of unused antibiotics: An often overlooked driver of antimicrobial resistance. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2020, 18, 697–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Gikonyo, D.; Gikonyo, A.; Luvayo, D.; Ponoth, P. Letter to the Editor Drug expiry debate: The myth and the reality. African Health Sciences 2019, 19, 2737–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Samantha, B.; Daniel, S. Can medications become harmful after the expiration date? Nursing 2019, 49, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ngumba, E.; Gachanja, A.; Tuhkanen, T. Occurrence of Selected Antibiotics and Antiretroviral Drugs in Nairobi River Basin, Kenya. Sci. Total Env. 2016, 539, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. National AIDS Control Council (NACC). Kenya HIV Estimates Report 2018. In Kenya HIV Estim; National Aids Control Council, Landmark Plaza: Nairobi, Kenya, 2018; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ministry of Health. KENPHIA 2018 Preliminary Report; Ministry of Health: Nairobi, Kenya, 2018.
  58. Oskam, M.J.; Pavlova, M.; Hongoro, C.; Groot, W. Socio-Economic Inequalities in Access to Drinking Water among Inhabitants of Informal Settlements in South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.
Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.
CharacteristicDescriptionn (%)
SexMale110 (25.0%)
Female375 (75.0%)
Age20–2465 (14.5%)
25–34173 (38.6%)
35–44115 (25.7%)
45+94 (21.2%)
SettlementOBUNGA24(5.4%)
MANYATTA A143 (32.1%)
MANYATTA B89 (19.9%)
NYALENDA A96 (21.4%)
NYALENDA B95 (21.2%)
HIV statusPositive21(4.7%)
Negative398 (88.8%)
Table
Table 2. Percentage distribution of sources of antibiotics used against demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.
Table 2. Percentage distribution of sources of antibiotics used against demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.
CharacteristicsSource of Antibiotic Used
Prescribed by a Doctor % (n)Advice from Friends % (n)Previous Experience % (n)Online Search % (n)Other (Chemist) % (n)p-Value
SexMale77.1 (37)40.0 (4)80.0(8)0.0(0)1.7(2)0.408
Female73.8(107)24.3(9)75.7(28)2.7(1)1.2(4)
HIV statusPositive87.5 (14) 0 (0)100 (2) 0(0)0 (0)0.001
Negative75.2(121)31.6(12)76.3(29) 2.6(1)1.3 (5)
SettlementsOBUNGA81.8(9)0 (0)50 (1)0 (0)4.2 (1)0.000
MANYATTA A81.6(62)0 (0)100 (13)0 (0)0 (0)
MANYATTA B64.9 (24)69.(9)84.6(11)0 (0)1.1 (1)
NYALENDA A70.2 (33)28.6 (4)71.4 (10)7.1 (1) 0 (0)
NYALENDA B72.7 (16)0 (0)20.0(1) 0 (0)4.2 (4)
Age20–2470.8 (17)71.4 (5)28.6 (2)0 (0)4.6 (3)0.086
25–3472.7 (48)77.8 (14)83.3 (15)5.6 (1)1.2 (2)
35–4473.6 (39)69.2 (9)100 (13)0 (0)0 (0)
45+80.0 (40)66.7 (6)66.7 (6)0 (0)1.1 (1)
Table
Table 3. Predictors of antibiotic use.
Table 3. Predictors of antibiotic use.
Antibiotic UseOdds RatioStd. Errorzp > z95% Conf. Interval
SexFemale1.330.31051.240.2150.845–2.105
HIV StatusPositive0.3130.2097−1.730.0830.084–1.163
Age (years)25–340.960.302−0.120.9080.522–1.782
35–440.990.335−0.030.9800.511–1.921
45+ 1.540.5501.220.2230.768–3.104
SettlementsMN A1.540.7210.910.3620.611–3.855
MN B1.170.5710.320.7480.449–3.042
NY A1.610.7780.980.3250.623–4.153
NY B0.420.207−1.760.0780.157–1.103
Cons2.2630881.7261561.070.2840.507–10.091
OBG—Obunga; MN A—Manyatta A; MN B—Manyatta B; NY A—Nyalenda A; NY B—Nyalenda B.
Table
Table 4. Distribution of completion of antibiotic dose by demographic characteristics.
Table 4. Distribution of completion of antibiotic dose by demographic characteristics.
CharacteristicsDescriptionYesNop-Value
SexMale39 (32.5)7 (5.8)0.647
Female117 (36.3)27 (8.4)
HIV statusPositive15 (71.4)1 (4.8)0.000
Negative130 (32.7)26 (6.5)
SettlementsMN A63 (43.8)13 (9.0)0.001
MN B30 (33.7)6 (6.7)
NY A35 (36.5)11(11.5)
NY B17 (17.9)4 (4.2)
OBG11 (45.8)0 (0)
Age20–2421 (32.3)2 (3.1)0.089
25–3455 (31.8)10 (5.8)
35–4440 (34.8)11 (9.6)
45+40 (42.6)11 (11.7)
OBG—Obunga; MN A—Manyatta A; MN B—Manyatta B; NY A—Nyalenda A; NY B—Nyalenda B.
Table
Table 5. Percentage distribution of groundwater use against sociodemographic characteristics.
Table 5. Percentage distribution of groundwater use against sociodemographic characteristics.
CharacteristicsGroundwater Use
Drinking
n (%)		Cooking
n (%)		Washing Utensils
n (%)		Washing Clothes
n (%)		House Cleaningn (%)p-Value
SexMale12.6 (15)21.8 (26)82.2 (97)94.9 (112)94.9 (112)0.261
Female7.5 (24)17.5 (56)79.1 (253)96.6 (309)95.3 (303)
HIV statusPositive19.0 (4)28.6 (6)85.7 (18)100.0 (21)95.2 (20)0.950
Negative8.9 (35)18.0 (71)79.2 (312) (79.2)95.9 (378)95.9 (376)
SettlementsOBG12.5 (3)16.7 (4)62.5 (15) 95.8 (23)95.8 (23)0.716
MN A1.4 (2)9.9 (14)92.2 (130)100.0 (141)92.8 (129)
MN B13.5 (12)25.8 (23)74.2 (66)93.3 (83)95.5 (85)
NY A10.5 (10)20.0 (19)80.0 (76)97.9 (93)95.8 (91)
NY B13.7 (13)24.2 (23)69.5 (66)91.6 (87)97.9 (93)
Age20–243.1 (2)12.3 (8)72.3 (47)95.4 (62)90.8 (59)0.660
25–347.1 (12)14.7 (25)71.2 (121)94.7 (161)95.9 (163)
35–449.6 (11)23.5 (27)89.6 (103)99.1 (114)94.7 (107)
45+16.0 (15)24.5 (23)87.1 (81)95.7 (89)97.8 (91)
OBG—Obunga; MN A—Manyatta A; MN B—Manyatta B; NY A—Nyalenda A; NY B—Nyalenda B.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karimi, K.J.; Ahmad, A.; Duse, A.; Mwanthi, M.; Ayah, R. Prevalence of Antibiotic Use and Disposal at Household Level in Informal Settlements of Kisumu, Kenya. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010287

AMA Style

Karimi KJ, Ahmad A, Duse A, Mwanthi M, Ayah R. Prevalence of Antibiotic Use and Disposal at Household Level in Informal Settlements of Kisumu, Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(1):287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010287

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karimi, Kellen J., Aijaz Ahmad, Adriano Duse, Mutuku Mwanthi, and Richard Ayah. 2023. "Prevalence of Antibiotic Use and Disposal at Household Level in Informal Settlements of Kisumu, Kenya" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 1: 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010287

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop