Next Article in Journal
Saharan Dust and Childhood Respiratory Symptoms in Benin
Next Article in Special Issue
Personality Traits and Sociodemographic Factors Associated with the Use of E-Cigarettes, Waterpipe and Conventional Cigarettes among Medical University Students
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding and Addressing Occupational Stressors in Internet-Delivered Therapy for Public Safety Personnel: A Qualitative Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasma Cotinine Is Positively Associated with Homocysteine in Smokers but Not in Users of Smokeless Tobacco
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph19084746
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Serotonin Receptor HTR3A Gene Polymorphisms rs1985242 and rs1062613, E-Cigarette Use and Personality

by
Aleksandra Suchanecka
1,
Jolanta Chmielowiec
2,
Krzysztof Chmielowiec
2,
Grzegorz Trybek
3,
Aleksandra Jaroń
3,
Wojciech Czarny
4,
Paweł Król
5,
Jolanta Masiak
6 and
Anna Grzywacz
1,*
1
Independent Laboratory of Health Promotion, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 11 Chlapowskiego St., 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
2
Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28 St., 65-046 Zielona Gora, Poland
3
Department of Oral Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 72 Powstanców Wlkp. St., 70-111 Szczecin, Poland
4
Faculty of Physical Education, University of Rzeszów, Towarnickiego 3 St., 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
5
College of Medical Sciences, Institute of Physical Culture Studies, University of Rzeszow, St. Towarnickiego 3, 35-955 Rzeszów, Poland
6
Neurophysiological Independent Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(8), 4746; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084746
Submission received: 23 February 2022 / Revised: 9 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 April 2022 / Published: 14 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives in Nicotine Use)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We nowadays record growing numbers of e-cigarette users. The development of nicotine dependence is a result of many factors, including genetics and personality. In this study we analyzed two polymorphisms—rs1985242 and rs1062613—in the serotonin receptor HTR3A gene in a group of e-cigarette users (n = 135) and controls (n = 106). Personality traits were measured using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. The comparison of e-cigarette users with the control group indicates that the former showed significantly higher scores on the neuroticism scale and lower scores on the scales of extraversion and conscientiousness of the NEO-FFI. Homozygote variants of rs1985242 were more frequent in the study group. The results of the 2 × 3 factorial ANOVA for e-cigarette users and the control group as well as interaction between the HTR3A rs1985242 variants were found for the NEO-FFI conscientiousness scale. These results allow us to conclude that the combination of psychological factors and genetic data creates a possibility for making more complete models of substance use disorders.

1. Introduction

We nowadays record growing numbers of e-cigarette users [1], but cigarette smoking is still the most common form of tobacco use and is one of the leading causes of premature death and disability [2]. Although attempts are made to control tobacco abuse, its negative impact on society is still very high. The World Health Organization estimates that currently there are about 1 billion smokers aged 15 years and above worldwide [3]. An estimated 24 million children aged 13–15 around the world smoke, and 13 million use smokeless tobacco [4]. Tobacco is one of the world’s greatest preventable causes of premature death, accounting for more than 8 million deaths each year [3]. The harmful effect of tobacco applies to non-smokers living with smokers, who are exposed to secondhand smoke–they are at greater risk for premature death as well [5]. Both methods of nicotine delivery—cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use—contribute to significant health and financial losses. Although many cigarette smokers want to stop smoking [6], few are successful [7,8]. Consequently, developing effective therapies that can help improve treatment outcomes, as well as methods that can prevent people from starting to smoke, remain an ongoing public health challenge. Therefore, it is important to compare people who use nicotine in various forms with people who have never became addicted.
Nicotine is a major psychoactive component of tobacco. It produces a variety of neurophysiological, motivational, and behavioral effects through interactions with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the central nervous system. Twin, family, and adoptive studies suggest that nicotine addiction is associated with genetic and environmental factors, and the genetic factor plays an important role in the development of addiction [9,10]. Addiction develops as a result of repeated exposure to a psychoactive agent that interferes with and modifies the brain function as well as some behaviors. These effects are determined by the psychoactive agent, frequency of use, individual metabolism, and sensitivity to the agent, comorbidities, as well as environmental and epigenetic factors. Compulsive behaviors and adaptive social interactions, which are often antisocial, change in order that the substances of abuse may be acquired and ingested [11].
The neurotransmitter, 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin), plays an important role for numerous body functions. It is primarily involved in gastrointestinal motility, vasoconstriction, and regulation of brain processes, such as motivation, learning, and memory. The 5-HT receptor family contains at least seven well-characterized subtypes, namely receptors 5-HT1 to 5-HT7, and further differentiation within each subtype. Amongst the 5-HT receptor family, the 5-HT3 receptor (5-HTR3) is a unique subtype because it is a ligand-gated ion channel, whereas the others are G-protein-coupled receptors. The 5-HTR3 mediates the transport of cations, mainly sodium, potassium, and calcium [12]. In humans, five different subunits of 5-HTR3, which may form a homopentamer or heteropentamer, have been identified—A, B, C, D, and E. Each of them is associated with different pharmacological properties and clinical effects. The 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are used to treat irritable bowel syndrome, nausea, and vomiting in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Recent studies are also looking at the therapeutic potential of the abovementioned antagonists in other diseases, such as pain and inflammation, psychiatric disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, and substance abuse. The 5-HTR3 has been found to be expressed in immune cells [13]. Interestingly, neural tissue inflammation has been implicated in the modulation of addiction, and studies indicate that 5-HTR3 antagonists are involved in this process [14]. Administration of 5-HTR3 antagonists has been shown to affect reward effects and other behaviors induced by addictive substances, such as alcohol, where ethanol has been shown to interact directly with 5-HT3 receptors [15,16]. They also affect opioid withdrawal symptoms [17,18]. The 5-HT3 receptor is involved in the modulation of dopamine—the main neurotransmitter that regulates addiction [15,19]. Moreover, this modulation is also associated with depressive effects [20]. In relation to substance abuse, depression is generally known as one of the common withdrawal symptoms that occur after the cessation of substance use, which often becomes a reason for the addicted person to start using the substance again.
Genetic studies indicate an association of genes encoding the 5-HT3 receptor with substance dependence, including nicotine [21,22,23,24]. A strong interaction between genes encoding 5-HT3A and 5-HT3B subunits and the serotonin transporter gene with nicotine addiction has been reported [23]. The above genes also show an association in patients with comorbidities or addiction to more than one substance [24]. Specific polymorphic sites, namely rs1062613 and rs1985242, have been chosen for the analysis due to their location and previously reported association with nicotine addiction [24]. Polymorphism rs1062613 is located in the 5′-UTR region of the HTR3A gene, and its variants are associated with altered expression of encoded protein [25]. The rs1985242 is an intronic variant associated with nicotine addiction [23] and pain [26]. The A and B subunits of the 5-HT3 receptor are expressed in the limbic area associated with the neurobiology of nicotine addiction [27,28], and nicotine affects the 5-HT3 receptor activity. Although the 5-HT3 receptor and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) belong to the same family of ligand-gated ion channels, nicotine acts as an antagonist on 5-HTR3 and at the same time is an agonist on the nAChR receptor [29,30,31].
The neurobiology of nicotine addiction is complex, but the general theory is that it occurs mainly through nicotine-induced activation of nAChR receptors—more specifically by α4β2. Upon nAChR activation, the receptor opens and allows calcium influx, which triggers the opening of a voltage-dependent calcium channel (VDCC), which causes further calcium influx and calcium release from intracellular stores, such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or mitochondria [32]. Calcium signaling is responsible for the release of numerous neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, serotonin, GABA, and glutamate, while nicotinic antagonists decrease that release [33]. The 5-HTR3 and nAChR receptors are approximately 30% homologous. Since both receptors are from the same superfamily, some physiological functions are thought to be modulated by both—for example modulation of blood pressure or pain responses [34]. The striatal nerve end has been shown to contain both 5-HTR3 and nAChR receptors, which suggests that a convergence of serotonergic and cholinergic systems takes place [35,36]. When two different receptors are located in the same nerve end, it is highly likely that those receptors will interact with each other, which is known as cross-regulation. Cross-regulation has been shown to occur between 5-HTR3 and nAChR in a calcium-dependent manner [35,37]. Activation of either 5-HTR3 or nAChR is followed by calcium influx through the receptor. It has been shown that there is a reduction in calcium response when nicotine was administered to the striatal nerve endings after a prolonged stimulation by the 5-HTR3 agonist, similar to that when the 5-HTR3 agonist was applied to the striatal nerve endings after prolonged nicotine stimulation [35]. It is believed that 5-HTR3 and nicotine interact through specific mechanisms that are yet to be fully comprehended.
Personality affects the person’s behavior and functioning through their lifetime. The Big Five [38,39,40] is a model consisting of five personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. Differences between people are determined by these traits in relation to behavior, emotion, motivation, and cognition [41]. Neuroticism is associated with a higher propensity to mood changes, anxiety, depressive moods, and feeling of loneliness [42,43]. Openness is associated with intelligence and non-typical thinking [44]. Conscientiousness is a tendency to control impulses [45]. Extraversion is associated with excitability and sociability [46]. Agreeableness is associated with pro-social behaviors [47]. Differences in levels of above-mentioned personality traits are often analyzed in addiction studies as one of the factors influencing substance dependence [48,49,50].
The aim of this study was to analyze factors influencing nicotine dependence. We analyzed two polymorphisms in the HTR3A gene rs1985242 and rs1062613, and personality traits measured by means of the NEO Five-Factor Personality Inventory in a group of e-cigarette users and controls. The lack of a subsample of regular (non-e-cigarette) smokers prohibits the claim of specificity of results for e-smokers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

The study was conducted in the Independent Laboratory of Health Promotion, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin. The study group included 135 volunteers using e-cigarettes (females: 49.63%, males: 50.37%) aged 26 ± 9.44 who were somatically healthy. A history of psychosis and addiction to a substance other than nicotine were excluded. The control group comprised 106 unrelated (females: 24.53%, males: 75.47%), healthy (non-dependent and non-psychosis) Polish volunteers aged 23.79 ± 8.72 who smoked less than 30 cigarettes in their lifetime. To reduce the possibility of racial gene skewing and to overcome any potential problems due to population stratification, all subjects and controls were Caucasian.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki principles and approved by the Ethics Committee. All subjects signed their informed consent for participating in the research. No financial or any other compensation for being part of the study was granted. The assessment process took place in a single session which lasted about 100 min. Psychologists and psychiatrists collected data for the semi structured interview. Additionally, the interviewed group was given an option to be helped by an assistant who was present in the room and who also checked if the tests were completed. All the procedures for allowing comfort and concentration were accomplished. Psychology specialists accomplished the interpretation of the tests.

2.2. Genetic Tests

DNA was obtained from venous blood. The genomic DNA was purified using standard methods. Samples from each subject were genotyped using the real-time PCR and fluorescence resonance energy transfer LightSNiP oligonucleotide probes on Light-Cycler 480 II (Roche Diagnostic, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The fluorescence signal was plotted against temperature. Peaks were obtained at 60.3 °C for the T allele and at 64.19 °C for the A allele of rs1985242 and at 56.3 °C for the C allele and at 64.06 °C for the T allele of rs1062613.

2.3. Psychological Tests

The NEO Personality Inventory scale (NEO Five-Factor Inventory, NEO-FFI) is based on six dimensions for each of the five traits: extraversion (positive emotion, warmth, gregariousness, activity, excitement seeking, and assertiveness); agreeableness (tendermindedness, trust, altruism, straightforwardness, compliance, and modesty); openness to experience (fantasy, feelings, aesthetics, actions, values, and ideas); conscientiousness (deliberation, competence, dutifulness, order, achievement striving, and self-discipline); and neuroticism (anxiety, vulnerability to stress, hostility, self-consciousness, impulsiveness, and depression) [38].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The concordance of the genotype frequencies and the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was tested using HWE software (https://wpcalc.com/en/equilibriumhardy-weinberg, accessed 3 June 2021). Associations among HTR3A rs1985242 and HTR3A rs1062613, e-cigarette users, controls, and the NEO Five Factor Inventory were analyzed using multivariate ANOVA (control and e-cigarette users × genetic trait × NEO-FFI × (control and e-cigarette users × genetic trait)) factor effects analysis. The homogeneity of variance condition was met (Levene’s test p > 0.05). Normality of distribution was not met for the analyzed variables. Analysis and comparison of the five-factor NEO Inventory scales was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
The chi square test and Cochran–Armitage trend test were used for association analysis of HTR3A rs1985242 and HTR3A rs1062613 and e-cigarette use. For these variables, the Bonferroni multiple comparisons correction was applied, and the accepted level of significance was 0.01 (0.05/5) and 0.0083 (0.05/6), respectively. All calculations were performed using STA-TISTICA 13 (Tibco Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) for Windows (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and CATT package in R for the calculation of Cochran–Armitage trend test.

3. Results

The frequency distributions did not accord with the HWE in the study group for both polymorphisms (Table 1).
Association analysis of genotypes and alleles of HTR3A rs1985242 and rs1062613 polymorphisms and e-cigarette use revealed statistically significant differences only in the Co-dominant model in frequencies of genotypes for rs1985242 (T/T 0.58 vs. 0.47; A/T 0.32 vs. 0.47; A/A 0.10 vs. 0.07; χ2 = 6.456; p = 0.0396). In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference between the control group and e-cigarette users in the Additive model (Cochran–Armitage trend test) in HTR3A rs1985242 (Z = −0.707, p = 0.480) and rs1062613 (Z = 0.044, p = 0.965) polymorphisms (Table 2).
In the U-Man test, there were no significant statistical differences in the control group between women (F) and men (Mn) in the components of the NEO-FFI tests (neuroticism scale F; M = 4.15 vs. Mn; M = 5.15, p = 0.055—not significant with Bonferroni correction; extraversion scale F; M = 7.19 vs. Mn, M= 6.89, p = 0.360; openness scale F; M = 5.04 vs. Mn; M = 5.03, p = 0.947; agreeableness scale F; M = 6.26 vs. Mn; M = 5.75, p = 0.231; conscientiousness scale F; M = 7.88 vs. Mn; M = 6.96, p = 0.053—not significant with Bonferroni correction).
The means and standard deviations of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory results in the group of e-cigarette users and controls are presented in Table 3. In comparison with the controls, the study group had significantly higher scores on the neuroticism scale (M 5.60 vs. M 4.91, p = 0.0117—not significant with Bonferroni correction) and lower scores on the extraversion scale (M 6.05 vs. M 6.96, p = 0.0014) and conscientiousness scale (M 6.05 vs. M 7.19, p < 0.0001).
However, Table 4 and Table 5 show the means and standard deviations of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory results in the group of e-cigarette users and controls, including the HTR3A rs1985242 and rs1062613 polymorphisms.

3.1. Conscientiousness Scale and HTR3A rs1985242

The results of 2 × 3 factorial ANOVA showed a statistically significant effect of the combined factor HTR3A rs1985242 genotype of e-cigarette users/control (F2,235 = 5.05, p = 0.0071, η2 = 0.041) (Table 4, Figure 1). For the power calculation, our sample had more than an 81% power to detect the combined factor of e-cigarette users/control x HTR3A rs1985242 and their interaction effect (about 4.1% of the phenotype variance). The post hoc analysis is shown in Table 4.
Post hoc LSD analysis showed a statistically significant lower score of conscientiousness scale in e-cigarette users result for the HTR3A rs1985242 polymorphic variant A/T M = 5.93 compared to control A/T M = 7.32, p = 0.0023 and A/A M = 9.17, p = 0.0007. The same was found for the conscientiousness scale of e-cigarette users variant A/A M = 5.14 compared to controls for A/T M = 7.32, p = 0.0010 and A/A M = 9.17, p = 0.0002 variants. Additionally, the scores were lower scores on the conscientiousness scale in e-cigarette users for T/T variant M = 6.28 versus controls A/A M = 9.17, p = 0.0019 (Table 6, Figure 1).

3.2. Conscientiousness Scale and HTR3A rs1062613

The results of the 2 × 3 factorial ANOVA showed a statistically significant effect of the combined factor HTR3A rs1062613 genotype of e-cigarette users /control (F2,235 = 3.74, p = 0.0251, η2 =0.031; not significant with Bonferroni correction) (Table 5, Figure 2). For the power calculation, our sample had more than a 68% power to detect the combined factor of e-cigarette users/control x HTR3A rs1062613 and their interaction effect (about 3.1% of the phenotype variance). The post-hoc analysis is shown in Table 4.
In the post hoc LSD analysis, a statistically significant lower scores of conscientiousness scale in e-cigarette users were obtained for the HTR3A rs1062613 polymorphic variant C/T M = 5.35 compared to control C/T M = 7.31, p = 0.0006, C/C M = 7.04, p = 0.0003 and T/T M = 9.67, p = 0.0012. Additionally, there was a lower conscientiousness scale e-cigarette users score for T/T polymorphism M = 5.57 versus the control polymorphism T/T M = 9.67, p = 0.006 (Table 6, Figure 2).

4. Discussion

E-cigarettes, which were introduced nearly 15 years ago as a smoke-free alternative to cigarettes, are now often used as a smoking cessation aid or harm reduction method for cigarette smokers. However, they are a source of nicotine, which may lead to addiction [51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. Furthermore, the distribution of nicotine in the brain and blood of e-cigarette users is very similar to the distribution and release rate as that of cigarettes, which further promotes a smoking reward and may lead to addiction [58,59,60]. Hence, e-cigarettes serve as a non-combustive substitute for cigarettes and support nicotine dependence [61]. To study nicotine addiction in the context of substance abuse in combination with other variables is rational due to the analyzed entity being multifactorial and multigene.
Our study showed differences in the analyzed personality traits between e-cigarette users and never smokers. The study group had significantly higher levels of neuroticism and lower levels of extraversion and conscientiousness than the control group. The meta-analysis [62] of personality traits and substance use disorders found an association of alcohol use disorders with low conscientiousness, inhibition, and neuroticism; other substance use disorders were also associated with low extraversion and agreeableness. Interestingly, the strength of the association was more prominent in the study group than in the population sample, indicating the importance of proper analysis of groups with mental health disorders [63]. Similar correlations of personality traits with substance use disorders were shown in the work of Zilberman et al. [64]. To directly assess whether personality traits are a source of comorbidity, Slutske et al. [65] analyzed personality traits in a group of 18-year-olds and their correlation with nicotine, cannabis, and alcohol dependence, as well as gambling disorders assessed at the age of 21. All the analyzed disorders were associated with negative emotionality and disinhibition. Cannabis addiction was associated with low positive emotionality. The high comorbidity between the analyzed disorders was reduced when individual personality traits were assessed. Individuals with a high index of neuroticism have a higher tendency for negative affect [66], and psychoactive substance use may be a way in which this affect is discharged [67,68]. Substance use and risky, unhealthy behaviors may be a consequence of low conscientiousness and higher impulsivity [69]. This explanation does not fully clarify the relationship between personality traits and substance use disorders [62]. Some authors [66,70,71] suggest that associations of certain traits with affective states and social functioning are risk factors for substance use disorders. Gender is another important variable to take into consideration. The NEO-FFI correlates for alcohol, nicotine, and cannabis use disorders were almost the same for males and females, while gender differences were evident for gambling disorders [72,73]. All the personality traits described above and their associations with various substance use disorders are also consistent with our previous studies of e-cigarette users [48], polysubstance use disorders [49,50], and cannabis use disorders [74].
Subsequent findings concerning the genetic analysis were performed. In our study, significant differences were found in the frequency of the rs1985242 genotype, with both homozygous T/T and A/A being more frequent in the study group, and the heterozygous genotype being more frequent in the control group. Interestingly, in the controls, the differences between the heterogeneous types and the homogenous genotypes AA and TT, respectively, are more pronounced than in the group of smokers. In addition, analyzing the interaction between genotype, smoking status, and personality trait, significant differences were found for the NEO-FFI contentiousness scale, with the greatest difference between smokers and never smokers occurring for the A/A genotype of rs1985242 and for the T/T genotype of rs1062613. Both analyzed polymorphisms are located in the HTR3A gene, with rs1062613 being a variant that regulates translation in the open-reading frame upstream of the HTR3A mRNA translation initiation site [25], while rs1985242 is located in the 5’UTR region. There is not much available data concerning the genotypes analyzed in our study in the context of nicotine addiction and no data regarding e-cigarette users. However, the published literature on the subject clearly shows an association of rs1985242 and rs1062613 with nicotine addiction [23]. Both polymorphisms were part of the haplotypes associated with nicotine dependence in a sample of African Americans [AA] but not in a group of European Americans [EA] [23]. SNP rs1062613 along with the interacting variant, rs1150220, were associated with the smoking quantity in the European American sample and in the pooled sample of EA and AA participants. The authors of this study also analyzed the HTR3B and 5HTT genes, concluding that interactions between the three serotonergic genes may represent interacting biological effects of nicotine on fast-acting serotonergic signaling in nicotine addiction. The results found in Chinese Han smokers further indicate the interaction of HTR3A and HTR3B genes in nicotine addiction [75]. In addition, SNP rs1062613 is associated with psychiatric disorders in individuals of European descent [76,77]. The rs1062613 C/C variant is also associated with the risk of developing mental health problems in victims of childhood sexual abuse due to low central serotonin activity [78]. When exposed to stress the C/C carriers exhibit a loss of gray matter in the hippocampus [77]. The above-mentioned SNP is of great functional importance is psychiatric diseases. In our study it was significant as a variant for the conscientiousness scale with T/T carriers having higher scores, which may be associated with higher serotonergic activity and protection against not only traumatic but difficult life situations and better emotional regulation.
Serotonin is one of the neurotransmitters that play a key role in cognitive behavioral functions, stress response, mood, appetite, and motor functions [79]. The results of our study are in line with the current literature on the subject and indicate effects of personality traits and genetic factors on nicotine addiction. However, only a few variables were analyzed jointly. Since we studied a group of patients who had been carefully assigned to particular homogeneous subgroups, at first we chose one gene for our analysis. To the authors’ best knowledge this is the first study that analyzes personality traits and two polymorphisms in the HTR3A gene in a group of e-cigarette users and never smokers. Nonetheless, we are aware of certain limitations of our research. Only individuals of Caucasian origin were studied, and as described before, associations of variants in the HTR3A gene vary between individuals of different origin.

5. Conclusions

The comparison of e-cigarette users with the control group of never smokers conclusively indicates that the former represented significantly higher scores on the neuroticism scale and lower scores on the scales of extraversion and conscientiousness of the NEO-FFI. Results of the 2 × 3 factorial ANOVA of e-cigarette users and the control subjects and the HTR3A rs1985242 variants interaction were found for the NEO-FFI conscientiousness scale. These results allow us to conclude that the combination of psychological factors and genetic data creates a possibility for making more complete models of substance use disorders.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and A.G.; methodology, J.C., W.C., P.K., G.T. and A.J.; software, K.C.; validation, J.M. and P.K.; formal analysis, A.S., A.G. and K.C.; investigation, A.S. and A.G; resources, A.S., A.G., W.C. and P.K.; data curation, K.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S. and K.C.; writing—review and editing, A.G., A.S. and J.M.; supervision, A.S. and A.G.; project administration, A.S., A.G. and G.T.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, grant number FSN-212-02/19.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin (KB-0012/164/17).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bao, W.; Xu, G.; Lu, J.; Snetselaar, L.G.; Wallace, R.B. Changes in Electronic Cigarette Use Among Adults in the United States, 2014–2016. JAMA 2018, 319, 2039–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Sopori, M.L. Effects of cigarette smoke on the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic 2021: Addressing New and Emerging Products; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
  4. WHO Global Report on Trends in Prevalence of Tobacco Use 2000–2025, 3rd ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  5. Wipfli, H.; Avila-Tang, E.; Navas-Acien, A.; Kim, S.; Onicescu, G.; Yuan, J.; Breysse, P.; Samet, J.M. Secondhand Smoke Exposure Among Women and Children: Evidence From 31 Countries. Am. J. Public Health 2008, 98, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cigarette smoking among adults—United States. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2007, 56, 1157–1161. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hughes, J.R.; Stead, L.F.; Lancaster, T. Antidepressants for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 1, IDCD000031. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lerman, C.E.; Schnoll, R.A.; Munafò, M.R. Genetics and smoking cessation—improving outcomes in smokers at risk. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2007, 33 (Suppl. S6), S398–S405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Maes, H.H.; Sullivan, P.F.; Bulik, C.; Neale, M.C.; Prescott, C.A.; Eaves, L.J.; Kendler, K.S. A twin study of genetic and environmental influences on tobacco initiation, regular tobacco use and nicotine dependence. Psychol. Med. 2004, 34, 1251–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Liand, M.D.; Burmeister, M. New insights into the genetics of addiction. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 225–231. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sharp, B.M.; Chen, H. Neurogenetic determinants and mechanisms of addiction to nicotine and smoked tobacco. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2018, 50, 2164–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Barnes, N.M.; Hales, T.G.; Lummis, S.C.; Peters, J.A. The 5-HT3 receptor—the relationship between structure and function. Neuropharmacology 2009, 56, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fiebich, B.L.; Akundi, R.S.; Seidel, M.; Geyer, V.; Haus, U.; Müller, W.; Stratz, T.; Candelario-Jalil, E. Expression of 5-HT3A receptors in cells of the immune system. Scand. J. Rheumatol. Suppl. 2004, 119, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nennig, S.; Schank, J. The Role of NFkB in Drug Addiction: Beyond Inflammation. Alcohol Alcohol. 2017, 52, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Engleman, E.A.; Rodd, Z.A.; Bell, R.L.; Murphy, J.M. The role of 5-HT3 receptors in drug abuse and as a target for pharmacotherapy. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2008, 7, 454–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Müller, C.P.; Homberg, J.R. The role of serotonin in drug use and addiction. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 277, 146–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chu, L.F.; Liang, D.Y.; Li, X.; Sahbaie, P.; D’Arcy, N.; Liao, G.; Peltz, G.; Clark, J.D. From mouse to man: The 5-HT3 receptor modulates physical dependence on opioid narcotics. Pharm. Genom. 2009, 19, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Erlendson, M.J.; D’Arcy, N.; Encisco, E.M.; Yu, J.J.; Rincon-Cruz, L.; Peltz, G.; Clark, J.D.; Chu, L. Palonosetron and hydroxyzine pre-treatment reduces the objective signs of experimentally-induced acute opioid withdrawal in humans: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abus. 2016, 43, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Carboni, E.; Acquas, E.; Frau, R.; Di Chiara, G. Differential inhibitory effects of a 5-HT3 antagonist on drug-induced stimulation of dopamine release. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1989, 164, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bétry, C.; Etiévant, A.; Oosterhof, C.; Ebert, B.; Sanchez, C.; Haddjeri, N. Role of 5-HT3 Receptors in the Antidepressant Response. Pharmaceuticals 2011, 4, 603–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Seneviratne, C.; Franklin, J.; Beckett, K.; Ma, J.Z.; Ait-Daoud, N.; Payne, T.J.; Johnson, B.A.; Li, M.D. Association, interaction, and replication analysis of genes encoding serotonin transporter and 5-HT3 receptor subunits A and B in alcohol dependence. Hum. Genet. 2013, 132, 1165–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Enoch, M.-A.; Gorodetsky, E.; Hodgkinson, C.; Roy, A.; Goldman, D. Functional genetic variants that increase synaptic serotonin and 5-HT3 receptor sensitivity predict alcohol and drug dependence. Mol. Psychiatry 2010, 16, 1139–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Yang, Z.; Seneviratne, C.; Wang, S.; Ma, J.Z.; Payne, T.J.; Wang, J.; Li, M.D. Serotonin transporter and receptor genes significantly impact nicotine dependence through genetic interactions in both European American and African American smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 129, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Yang, J.; Li, M.D. Association and interaction analyses of 5-HT3 receptor and serotonin transporter genes with alcohol, cocaine, and nicotine dependence using the SAGE data. Hum Genet. 2014, 133, 905–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Niesler, B.; Flohr, T.; Nöthen, M.M.; Fischer, C.; Rietschel, M.; Franzek, E.; Albus, M.; Propping, P.; Rappold, G.A. Association between the 5′ UTR variant C178T of the serotonin receptor gene HTR3A and bipolar affective disorder. Pharmacogenetics 2001, 11, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Knisely, M.R.; Conley, Y.P.; Smoot, B.; Paul, S.M.; Levine, J.D.; Miaskowski, C. Associations Between Catecholaminergic and Serotonergic Genes and Persistent Arm Pain Severity Following Breast Cancer Surgery. J. Pain 2019, 20, 1100–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Davies, P.A.; Pistis, M.; Hanna, M.C.; Peters, J.A.; Lambert, J.J.; Hales, T.G.; Kirkness, E.F. The 5-HT3B subunit is a major determinant of serotonin-receptor function. Nature 1999, 397, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dubin, A.E.; Huvar, R.; D’Andrea, M.R.; Pyati, J.; Zhu, J.Y.; Joy, K.C.; Wilson, S.J.; Galindo, J.E.; Glass, C.A.; Luo, L.; et al. The Pharmacological and Functional Characteristics of the Serotonin 5-HT3A Receptor Are Specifically Modified by a 5-HT3B Receptor Subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 30799–30810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Breitinger, H.A.; Geetha, N.; Hess, G.P. Inhibition of the serotonin 5-HT3 receptor by nicotine, cocaine, and fluoxetine investigated by rapid chemical kinetic techniques. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 8419–8429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schreiner, B.S.P.; Lehmann, R.; Thiel, U.; Ziemba, P.M.; Beltrán, L.R.; Sherkheli, M.A.; Jeanbourquin, P.; Hugi, A.; Werner, M.; Gisselmann, G.; et al. Direct action and modulating effect of (+)- and (−)-nicotine on ion channels expressed in trigeminal sensory neurons. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 728, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gurley, D.A.; Lanthorn, T.H. Nicotinic agonists competitively antagonize serotonin at mouse 5-HT3 receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Neurosci. Lett. 1998, 247, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shen, J.; Yakel, J.L. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated calcium signaling in the nervous system. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2009, 30, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Dani, J.A.; Bertrand, D. Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors and Nicotinic Cholinergic Mechanisms of the Central Nervous System. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 47, 699–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Drisdel, R.C.; Sharp, D.; Henderson, T.; Hales, T.G.; Green, W.N. High Affinity Binding of Epibatidine to Serotonin Type 3 Receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 9659–9665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Dougherty, J.J.; Nichols, R.A. Cross-regulation between colocalized nicotinic acetylcholine and 5-HT3 serotonin receptors on presynaptic nerve terminals. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2009, 30, 788–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Nayak, S.V.; Rondé, P.; Spier, A.D.; Lummis, S.C.; Nichols, R.A. Nicotinic receptors co-localize with 5-HT3 serotonin receptors on striatal nerve terminals. Neuropharmacology 2000, 39, 2681–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yamauchi, J.G.; Nemecz, Á.K.; Nguyen, Q.T.; Muller, A.; Schroeder, L.F.; Talley, T.T.; Lindstrom, J.; Kleinfeld, D.; Taylor, P. Characterizing ligand-gated ion channel receptors with genetically encoded Ca++ sensors. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Costa, P.; McCrae, R.R. The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R); Sage Publication, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA,, 2008; pp. 179–198. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sutin, A.R.; Terracciano, A.; Deiana, B.; Uda, M.; Schlessinger, D.; Lakatta, E.; Costa, P.T., Jr. Cholesterol, triglycerides, and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Biol. Psychol. 2010, 84, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Terracciano, A.; Esko, T.; Sutin, A.R.; de Moor, M.H.M.; Meirelles, O.; Zhu, G.; Tanaka, T.; Giegling, I.; Nutile, T.; Realo, A.; et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies common variants in CTNNA2 associated with excitement-seeking. Transl. Psychiatry 2011, 1, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Deyoung, C.G.; Hirsh, J.B.; Shane, M.S.; Papademetris, X.; Rajeevan, N.; Gray, J.R. Testing Predictions From Personality Neuroscience. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21, 820–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thompson, E. Development and Validation of an International English Big-Five Mini-Markers. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2008, 45, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Matthews, G.; Deary, I.J. Personality Traits; University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  44. Deyoung, C.G.; Peterson, J.B.; Higgins, D.M. Sources of Openness/Intellect: Cognitive and Neuropsychological Correlates of the Fifth Factor of Personality. J. Pers. 2005, 73, 825–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. John, O.P.; Srivastava, S. The Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives; University of California: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  46. Friedman, H.S.; Schustack, M.W. Personality: Classic Theories and Modern Research; Allyn & Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pietras, T.; Witusik, A.; Panek, M.; Szemraj, J.; Górski, P. Anxiety, depression and methods of stress coping in patients with nicotine dependence syndrome. Med. Sci. Monit. 2011, 17, CR272–CR276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Grzywacz, A.; Suchanecka, A.; Chmielowiec, J.; Chmielowiec, K.; Szumilas, K.; Masiak, J.; Balwicki, Ł.; Michalowska-Sawczyn, M.; Trybek, G. Chmielowiec Personality Traits or Genetic Determinants—Which Strongly Influences E-Cigarette Users? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Suchanecka, A.; Chmielowiec, J.; Chmielowiec, K.; Masiak, J.; Sipak-Szmigiel, O.; Sznabowicz, M.; Czarny, W.; Michałowska-Sawczyn, M.; Trybek, G.; Grzywacz, A. Dopamine Receptor DRD2 Gene rs1076560, Personality Traits and Anxiety in the Polysubstance Use Disorder. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Grzywacz, A.; Chmielowiec, J.; Chmielowiec, K.; Mroczek, B.; Masiak, J.; Suchanecka, A.; Sipak-Szmigiel, O.; Szumilas, K.; Trybek, G. The Ankyrin Repeat and Kinase Domain Containing 1 Gene Polymorphism (ANKK1Taq1A) and Personality Traits in Addicted Subjects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Benowitz, N.L. Clinical Pharmacology of Inhaled Drugs of Abuse: Implications in Understanding Nicotine Dependence. NIDA Res. Monogr. 1990, 99, 12–29. [Google Scholar]
  52. Henningfield, J.E.; Keenan, R.M. Nicotine delivery kinetics and abuse liability. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1993, 61, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schneider, N.G.; Olmstead, R.E.; Franzon, M.A.; Lunell, E. The Nicotine Inhaler: Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Comparison with Other Nicotine Treatments. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2001, 40, 661–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Caldwell, B.; Sumner, W.; Crane, J. A Systematic Review of Nicotine by Inhalation: Is There a Role for the Inhaled Route? Nicotine Tob. Res. 2012, 14, 1127–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Samaha, A.-N.; Yau, W.-Y.W.; Yang, P.; Robinson, T.E. Rapid delivery of nicotine promotes behavioral sensitization and alters its neurobiological impact. Biol. Psychiatry 2005, 57, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wing, V.C.; Shoaib, M. Effect of infusion rate on intravenous nicotine self-administration in rats. Behav. Pharmacol. 2013, 24, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Allain, F.; Minogianis, E.-A.; Roberts, D.; Samaha, A.-N. How fast and how often: The pharmacokinetics of drug use are decisive in addiction. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015, 56, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Vansickel, A.R.; Eissenberg, T. Electronic Cigarettes: Effective Nicotine Delivery After Acute Administration. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2012, 15, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Farsalinos, K.E.; Spyrou, A.; Stefopoulos, C.; Tsimopoulou, K.; Kourkoveli, P.; Tsiapras, D.; Kyrzopoulos, S.; Poulas, K.; Voudris, V. Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: Comparison between experienced consumers (vapers) and naïve users (smokers). Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. St. Helen, G.; Havel, C.; Dempsey, D.A.; Jacob, P., 3rd; Benowitz, N.L. Nicotine delivery, retention and pharmacokinetics from various electronic cigarettes. Addiction 2016, 111, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sai, K.K.S.; Zuo, Y.; Rose, J.E.; Garg, P.K.; Garg, S.; Nazih, R.; Mintz, A.; Mukhin, A.G. Rapid Brain Nicotine Uptake from Electronic Cigarettes. J. Nucl. Med. 2019, 61, 928–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kotov, R.; Gamez, W.; Schmidt, F.; Watson, D. Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 2010, 136, 768–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Krueger, R.F.; Caspi, A.; Moffitt, T.E. Epidemiological personology: The unifying role of personality in population-based research on problem behaviors. J. Personal. 2000, 68, 967–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zilberman, N.; Yadid, G.; Efrati, Y.; Neumark, Y.; Rassovsky, Y. Personality profiles of substance and behavioral addictions. Addict. Behav. 2018, 82, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Slutske, W.S.; Caspi, A.; Moffitt, T.E.; Poulton, R. Personality and problem gambling: A prospective study of a birth cohort of young adults. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2005, 62, 769–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Lahey, B.B. Public health significance of neuroticism. Am. Psychol. 2009, 64, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Cooper, M.L. Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychol. Assess. 1994, 6, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Simons, J.; Correia, C.J.; Carey, K.B.; Borsari, B.E. Validating a five-factor marijuana motives measure: Relations with use, problems, and alcohol motives. J. Couns. Psychol. 1998, 45, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Raynor, D.A.; Levine, H. Associations between the five-factor model of personality and health behaviors among college students. J. Am. Coll. Health 2009, 58, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Adan, A.; Forero, D.; Navarro, J.F. Personality Traits Related to Binge Drinking: A Systematic Review. Front. Psychiatry 2017, 8, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Oreland, L.; Lagravinese, G.; Toffoletto, S.; Nilsson, K.W.; Harro, J.; Cloninger, C.R.; Comasco, E. Personality as an intermediate phenotype for genetic dissection of alcohol use disorder. J. Neural Transm. 2018, 125, 107–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Petry, N.M.; Stinson, F.S.; Grant, B.F. Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2005, 66, 564–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dash, G.F.; Slutske, W.S.; Martin, N.G.; Statham, D.J.; Agrawal, A.; Lynskey, M.T. Big Five personality traits and alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, and gambling disorder comorbidity. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2019, 33, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Lachowicz, M.; Chmielowiec, J.; Chmielowiec, K.; Suchanecka, A.; Michałowska-Sawczyn, M.; Mierzecki, A.; Mroczek, B.; Grzywacz, A. Psychological factors and genetic characteristics of rural cannabis users. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2020, 27, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Han, H.; Liu, Q.; Yang, Z.; Wang, M.; Ma, Y.; Cao, L.; Cui, W.; Yuan, W.; Payne, T.J.; Li, L.; et al. Association and cis-mQTL analysis of variants in serotonergic genes associated with nicotine dependence in Chinese Han smokers. Transl. Psychiatry 2018, 8, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Walstab, J.; Rappold, G.; Niesler, B. 5-HT3 receptors: Role in disease and target of drugs. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 128, 146–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gatt, J.M.; Williams, L.M.; Schofield, P.R.; Dobson-Stone, C.; Paul, R.H.; Grieve, S.M.; Clark, C.R.; Gordon, E.; Nemeroff, C.B. Impact of the HTR3A gene with early life trauma on emotional brain networks and depressed mood. Depression Anxiety 2010, 27, 752–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jang, K.-I.; Lee, S.-H.; Huh, H.J.; Chae, J.-H. Influence of the 5-HT3A Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Childhood Sexual Trauma on Central Serotonin Activity. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Jasinska, A.J.; Chua, H.F.; Ho, S.S.; Polk, T.A.; Rozek, L.S.; Strecher, V.J. Amygdala response to smoking-cessation messages mediates the effects of serotonin transporter gene variation on quitting. NeuroImage 2012, 60, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijerph 19 04746 g001 550
Figure 1. Interaction between e-cigarette users/controls, HTR3A rs1985242 and conscientiousness scale. * significant statistical differences, # Bonferroni correction was used, and the p value was reduced to 0.0083 (p = 0.05/6 (number of statistical tests conducted)).
Figure 1. Interaction between e-cigarette users/controls, HTR3A rs1985242 and conscientiousness scale. * significant statistical differences, # Bonferroni correction was used, and the p value was reduced to 0.0083 (p = 0.05/6 (number of statistical tests conducted)).
Ijerph 19 04746 g001
Ijerph 19 04746 g002 550
Figure 2. Interaction between e-cigarette users/controls, HTR3A rs1062613 and conscientiousness scale. * significant statistical differences, # Bonferroni correction was used, and the p value was reduced to 0.0083 (p = 0.05/6 (number of statistical tests conducted)).
Figure 2. Interaction between e-cigarette users/controls, HTR3A rs1062613 and conscientiousness scale. * significant statistical differences, # Bonferroni correction was used, and the p value was reduced to 0.0083 (p = 0.05/6 (number of statistical tests conducted)).
Ijerph 19 04746 g002
Table
Table 1. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium of the HTR3A rs1985242 and rs1062613 in the group of e-cigarette users and controls.
Table 1. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium of the HTR3A rs1985242 and rs1062613 in the group of e-cigarette users and controls.
E-Cigarette Users
n = 135
Observed (Expected)		χ2
(p Value)
Allele Frequencies		Controls
n = 106
Observed (Expected)		χ2
(p Value)
Allele Frequencies
HTR3A rs1985242
T/T78 (73.3)4.291 (0.038)50 (53.1)2.071 (0.151)
A/T43 (52.3)p allele freq (T) = 0.7450 (43.9)p allele freq (T) = 0.71
A/A14 (9.3)q allele freq (A) = 0.266 (9.1)q allele freq (A) = 0.29
HTR3A rs1062613
C/C97 (93.8)4.056 (0.044)74 (73.9)0.006 (0.938)
C/T31 (37.5)p allele freq (G) = 0.8329 (29.2)p allele freq (G) = 0.83
T/T7 (3.8)q allele freq (T) = 0.173 (2.9)q allele freq (T) = 0.17
Table
Table 2. Frequencies of genotypes and alleles of HTR3A rs1985242 and rs1062613 in the group of e-cigarette users and controls.
Table 2. Frequencies of genotypes and alleles of HTR3A rs1985242 and rs1062613 in the group of e-cigarette users and controls.
E-Cigarette UsersControlsCo-Dominant Model
χ2
(p Value)		OR
(95% Confidence)		Additive Model
Cochran-Armitage Trend Test
Z (p Value)
HTR3A rs 1985242
n = 135n = 1066.456 (0.0396) * −0.707 (0.480)
T/T78 (57.78%)50 (47.17%)0.520 (0.4722)
A/T43 (31.85%)50 (47.17%) 0.55 (0.32–0.95) *
A/A14 (10.37%)6 (5.66%) 1.50 (0.54–4.14) *
T199 (73.70%)150 (70.75%)
A71 (26.30%)62 (29.25%)
HTR3A rs1062613
n = 135n = 1061.289 (0.5248) 0.044 (0.965)
C/C97 (71.85%)74 (69.81%)0.001 (0.9633)
C/T31 (22.96%)29 (27.36%) 0.81 (0.45–1.47)
T/T7 (5.19%)3 (2.83%) 1.77 (0.44–7.10)
C225 (83.33%)177 (83.49%)
T45 (16.67%)35 (16.51%)
p—statistical significance, χ2—Chi2 test result, n—number of subjects, * significant statistical differences, OR—odds ratio.
Table
Table 3. Analysis of NEO Five Factor Inventory results in e-cigarette users and controls.
Table 3. Analysis of NEO Five Factor Inventory results in e-cigarette users and controls.
NEO Five Factor InventoryE-Cigarette Users
(n = 153)
M ± SD		Control
(n = 152)
M ± SD		U Mann–Whitney Zp Value
Neuroticism scale5.60 ± 2.194.91 ± 2.242.5220.0117 *
Extraversion scale6.05 ± 2.136.96 ± 1.93−3.1900.0014 *,#
Openness scale5.10 ± 1.925.03 ± 1.880.2020.8399
Agreeableness scale5.60 ± 2.345.88 ± 2.26−0.9090.3632
Conscientiousness scale6.05 ± 2.157.19 ± 2.25−4.1470.0000 *,#
M—mean, SD—standard deviation, U—Mann–Whitney Z-test. * significant statistical differences. # Bonferroni correction was used, and the p value was reduced to 0.01 (p = 0.05/5 (number of statistical tests conducted)).
Table
Table 4. The results of 2 × 3 factorial ANOVA for e-cigarette users and controls, NEO Five Factor Inventory and HTR3A rs1985242.
Table 4. The results of 2 × 3 factorial ANOVA for e-cigarette users and controls, NEO Five Factor Inventory and HTR3A rs1985242.
NEO Five Factor InventoryGroupHTR3A rs1985242ANOVA (Interaction)
T/T
(n = 128)
M ± SD		A/T
(n = 93)
M ± SD		A/A
(n = 20)
M ± SD		E-Cigarette Users/Control x HTR3A rs1985242
F (p Value)		ɳ2Power
(Alfa = 0.05)
Neuroticism scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1355.43 ± 2.116.00 ± 2.295.290 ± 2.33F2,235 = 0.28 (p = 0.7561)0.0020.094
Control; n = 1064.88 ± 2.505.00 ± 2.024.33 ± 1.86
Extraversion scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1355.91 ± 2.116.42 ± 2.255.71 ± 1.82F2,235 = 1.24 (p = 0.2907)0.0100.269
Control; n = 1066.80 ± 2.027.00 ± 1.868.00 ± 1.55
Openness scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1355.19 ± 1.585.21 ± 1.584.21 ± 1.63F2,235 = 1.52 (p = 0.2217)0.0130.321
Control; n = 1064.94 ± 2.235.04 ± 1.435.67 ± 2.25
Agreeableness scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1355.88 ± 2.375.07 ± 2.245.64 ± 2.37F2,235 = 1.95 (p = 0.1440)0.0160.402
Control; n = 1065.66 ± 2.386.10 ± 2.095.83 ± 2.86
Conscientiousness scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1356.28 ± 2.125.93 ± 2.285.14 ± 1.70F2,235 = 5.05 *,# (p = 0.0071)0.0410.814
Control; n = 1066.82 ± 2.087.32 ± 2.389.17 ± 1.60
M—mean, SD—standard deviation. * significant statistical differences. # Bonferroni correction was used, and the p value was reduced to 0.01 (p = 0.05/5 (number of statistical tests conducted)).
Table
Table 5. The results of 2 × 3 factorial ANOVA for e-cigarette users and controls, NEO Five Factor Inventory and HTR3A rs1062613.
Table 5. The results of 2 × 3 factorial ANOVA for e-cigarette users and controls, NEO Five Factor Inventory and HTR3A rs1062613.
NEO Five Factor InventoryGroupHTR3A rs1062613ANOVA (Interaction)
C/C
(n = 171)
M ± SD		C/T
(n = 60)
M ± SD		T/T
(n = 10)
M ± SD		E-Cigarette Users/Control x HTR3A rs1062613
F (p Value)		ɳ2Power
(Alfa = 0.05)
Neuroticism scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1355.40 ± 2.286.19 ± 1.975.71 ± 1.50F2,235 = 0.64 (p = 0.5276)0.0050.157
Control; n = 1064.85 ± 2.245.17 ± 2.253.67 ± 2.08
Extraversion scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1354.86 ± 1.576.39 ± 2.206.03 ± 2.12F2,235 = 2.27 (p = 0.1059)0.0190.458
Control; n = 1068.67 ± 0.577.24 ± 2.106.78 ± 1.86
Openness scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1354.14 ± 1.865.19 ± 1.425.13 ± 2.05F2,235 = 2.66 (p = 0.0723)0.0220.524
Control; n = 1067.00 ± 1.735.13 ± 1.364.91 ± 2.03
Agreeableness scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1356.43 ± 2.074.90 ± 2.245.76 ± 2.36F2,235 = 0.66 (p = 0.5183)0.0060.160
Control; n = 1065.67 ± 4.165.72 ± 2.225.95 ± 2.23
Conscientiousness scaleE-cigarette users; n = 1356.31 ± 2.145.35 ± 2.185.57 ± 1.40F2,235 = 3.74 * (p = 0.0251)0.0310.681
Control; n = 1067.04 ± 2.217.31 ± 2.359.67 ± 0.58
M—mean, SD—standard deviation. * significant statistical differences. # Bonferroni correction was used, and the p value was reduced to 0.01 (p = 0.05/5 (number of statistical tests conducted)).
Table
Table 6. Post hoc LSD (least significant difference) test of interactions between e-cigarette users/controls, HTR3A rs1985242, HTR3A rs1062613, and the conscientiousness scale.
Table 6. Post hoc LSD (least significant difference) test of interactions between e-cigarette users/controls, HTR3A rs1985242, HTR3A rs1062613, and the conscientiousness scale.
HTR3A rs1985242 and NEO FFI Conscientiousness Scale
{1}
M = 5.93		{2}
M = 5.14		{3}
M = 6.28		{4}
M = 7.32		{5}
M = 9.17		{6}
M = 6.82
E-cigarette users HTR3A A/T {1} 0.23880.39350.0023 *,#0.0007*,#0.0495 *
E-cigarette users HTR3A A/A {2} 0.07140.0010 *,#0.0002*,#0.0111 *
E-cigarette users HTR3A T/T {3} 0.0087 *0.0019 *,#0.1719
Control HTR3A A/T {4} 0.0497 *0.2498
Control HTR3A A/A {5} 0.0129 *
Control HTR3A T/T {6}
HTR3A rs1062613 and NEO FFI Conscientiousness Scale
{1}
M = 5.35		{2}
M = 6.31		{3}
M = 5.57		{4}
M = 7.31		{5}
M = 7.04		{6}
M = 9.67
E-cigarette users HTR3A C/T{1} 0.0341 *0.81170.0006 *,#0.0003 *,#0.0012 *,#
E-cigarette users HTR3A C/C {2} 0.3860.03030.0301 *0.0089 *
E-cigarette users HTR3A T/T {3} 0.05840.08830.0067 *,#
Control HTR3A C/T {4} 0.5710.0748
Control HTR3A C/C {5} 0.0411 *
Control HTR3A T/T {6}
* significant statistical differences, M—mean. # Bonferroni correction was used, and the p value was reduced to 0.0083 (p = 0.05/6 (number of statistical tests conducted)).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suchanecka, A.; Chmielowiec, J.; Chmielowiec, K.; Trybek, G.; Jaroń, A.; Czarny, W.; Król, P.; Masiak, J.; Grzywacz, A. Serotonin Receptor HTR3A Gene Polymorphisms rs1985242 and rs1062613, E-Cigarette Use and Personality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084746

AMA Style

Suchanecka A, Chmielowiec J, Chmielowiec K, Trybek G, Jaroń A, Czarny W, Król P, Masiak J, Grzywacz A. Serotonin Receptor HTR3A Gene Polymorphisms rs1985242 and rs1062613, E-Cigarette Use and Personality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(8):4746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084746

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suchanecka, Aleksandra, Jolanta Chmielowiec, Krzysztof Chmielowiec, Grzegorz Trybek, Aleksandra Jaroń, Wojciech Czarny, Paweł Król, Jolanta Masiak, and Anna Grzywacz. 2022. "Serotonin Receptor HTR3A Gene Polymorphisms rs1985242 and rs1062613, E-Cigarette Use and Personality" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 8: 4746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084746

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop