Next Article in Journal
Oxysterols Profile in Zebrafish Embryos Exposed to Triclocarban and Propylparaben—A Preliminary Study
Previous Article in Journal
Adsorption Performance of Cd(II) by Chitosan-Fe3O4-Modified Fish Bone Char
Previous Article in Special Issue
Variations of the Locomotor Profile, Sprinting, Change-of-Direction, and Jumping Performances in Youth Soccer Players: Interactions between Playing Positions and Age-Groups
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Growth, Somatic Maturation, and Their Impact on Physical Health and Sports Performance: An Editorial

1
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
2
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Study of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(3), 1266; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031266
Submission received: 17 January 2022 / Accepted: 20 January 2022 / Published: 24 January 2022
Over time, complex interactions and a nonlinear progression among a wide range of variables contribute to the improvement of physical health and of the elite level achievement in youth sport practitioners. Various elements, including technical skills, physical performance, environmental circumstances, and social conditioning, contribute to the development of these processes [1,2].
An influencing factor of growth and physical performance is somatic maturation [3,4]. The pubertal period is a critical time frame for skill acquisition and the development of performance in young people, in which suitable training strategies should be adopted to preserve the state of health while avoiding the risk of injury [5]. Athletes with similar chronological age competing in the same category levels can, in fact, show a difference in maturity status, and therefore in size, function, and body structure [6,7]. Physical and psychological differences related to maturity status and birthdate amongst athletes of the same selection year have been identified in a variety of sports and could be linked with the dropout of youth practitioners and a reduction in the talent pool [6].
Contemporary researchers have contributed to research on improving health and sports performance through the development of new measurement methods and training strategies in young athletes [8,9]. The aim of this Special Issue of IJERPH entitled Growth, Somatic Maturation, and Their Impact on Physical Health and Sports Performance [10] is to propose and evaluate new training strategies aimed at improving the health status and physical performance of young athletes while highlighting the relationship between somatic maturation, anthropometry features, education, and health-related factors via longitudinal and cross-sectional studies.
A total of 11 manuscripts are published here on different topics related to youth subjects and sports practice, as shown in Figure 1. Three papers are on physical performance aspects [11,12,13], five papers provide innovative findings in relation to anthropometry and body composition features [14,15,16,17,18], one paper examines the difficulties of running online physical education classes in the context of COVID-19 [19], and two are on the influence of training strategies on muscle strength and blood pressure [20,21].
Concerning physical and sports performance, Silva et al. [11] revealed that chronological age plays a determinant effect on vertical jump, linear sprint, and change of direction, revealing that older soccer players achieve better performance. On the contrary, playing position is not determined by age. Different player roles in youth basketball players were considered in the study of Ivanovic and co-workers [12]. The authors showed that (i) change of direction speed is the highest-ranked characteristic in basketball guards; (ii) jump performance is the highest-ranked feature in forwards; (iii) control of specific movements while dribbling the ball is the higher-ranked aspect in centers. Lastly, Ha et al. [13] demonstrated that neurocognitive function tests should not be used to predict lower extremity injuries in collegiate athletes.
Most of the papers published in this Special Issue focus on body composition, growth, and sports practice. In fact, body composition assessment is an important practice in sports management [22,23], given its numerous implications on the health and physical performance of youth subjects [24]. Obesity, child motor development, and physical fitness are influenced by socioeconomic status. In fact, Africa et al. [14] showed that in contrast to Western countries, children with lower socioeconomic status are leaner with a lower body fat and have better locomotor skills compared to their higher socioeconomic status peers in South Africa. Slankamenac et al. [16] provided specific somatotype profiles for Montenegrin karatekas, highlighting the peculiarities in body shape among different age and weight categories. Similarly, Penichet-Tomas et al. [17] published anthropometric references for male and female traditional rowers. The effect of age on body composition was also evaluated by Cattem and colleagues [18] in male and female athletes, who reported that subjects older than 13 years exhibited high fluid content and cell mass using qualitative and quantitative bioimpedance-based assessments. These data should be carefully considered in when developing training programs and talent selection procedures. In addition, Athayde et al. [15] reported that age at menarche and somatic growth are the primary indicators of physical performance in young female judo athletes.
Only one study examined the difficulties of running online physical education classes in the context of COVID-19 and used the findings to develop an efficient operation plan to address these difficulties [19]. The authors suggested that changes in strategic learning methods are needed to understand online physical education characteristics and thereby better communicate the value of physical education. They reported that it is necessary to cultivate teaching expertise through sharing online physical education classes, where collaboration among physical education teachers is central. In addition, the authors suggested that the evaluation processes should be less formal to encourage active student participation.
Two studies concerned resistance training practice and its effect on muscle strength and blood pressure in adolescents and young adults. Gullielm et al. [20] systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the current evidence for the effects of resistance training on blood pressure in children and adolescents, concluding that this kind of exercise has no adverse effects on blood pressure and may positively affect it in youths. Lastly, Nunes et al. [21] suggested that biceps brachii muscle adaptations following a 10-week training program is almost identical regardless of whether peak torque emphasis was carried out in the final degrees or initial degrees of the range of motion in young adults.
In conclusion, as well as growth and development impacting children’s sporting experience and physical characteristics, sports practice can also impact children’s development and performance. This Special Issue reveals that the evolution of a healthy and successful athlete has a multifaceted nature and that several evaluation and training strategies are currently available to practitioners.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C. and G.G.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C.; writing—review and editing, G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Silva, A.M. Structural and functional body components in athletic health and performance phenotypes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 73, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Campa, F.; Piras, A.; Raffi, M.; Toselli, S. Functional Movement Patterns and Body Composition of High-Level Volleyball, Soccer, and Rugby Players. J. Sport Rehabil. 2019, 740–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Campa, F.; Silva, A.M.; Iannuzzi, V.; Mascherini, G.; Benedetti, L.; Toselli, S. The Role of Somatic Maturation on Bioimpedance Patterns and Body Composition in Male Elite Youth Soccer Players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Towlson, C.; Cobley, S.; Parkin, G.; Lovell, R. When does the influence of maturation on anthropometric and physical fitness characteristics increase and subside? Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2018, 28, 1946–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Monasterio, X.; Gil, S.M.; Bidaurrazaga-Letona, I.; Lekue, J.A.; Santisteban, J.M.; Diaz-Beitia, G.; Lee, D.-J.; Zumeta-Olaskoaga, L.; Martin-Garetxana, I.; Bikandi, E.; et al. The burden of injuries according to maturity status and timing: A two-decade study with 110 growth curves in an elite football academy. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Toselli, S.; Campa, F.; Maietta Latessa, P.; Greco, G.; Loi, A.; Grigoletto, A.; Zaccagni, L. Differences in Maturity and Anthropometric and Morphological Characteristics among Young Male Basketball and Soccer Players and Non-Players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Toselli, S.; Marini, E.; Maietta Latessa, P.; Benedetti, L.; Campa, F. Maturity Related Differences in Body Composition Assessed by Classic and Specific Bioimpedance Vector Analysis among Male Elite Youth Soccer Players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. García-Hermoso, A.; Izquierdo, M.; Alonso-Martínez, A.M.; Faigenbaum, A.; Olloquequi, J.; Ramírez-Vélez, R. Association between Exercise-Induced Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Adiposity among Overweight and Obese Youth: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Analysis. Children 2020, 7, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chulvi-Medrano, I.; Pombo, M.; Saavedra-García, M.Á.; Rebullido, T.R.; Faigenbaum, A.D. A 47-Year Comparison of Lower Body Muscular Power in Spanish Boys: A Short Report. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2020, 5, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Campa, F.; Greco, G. Special Issue “Growth, Somatic Maturation and Their Impact on Physical Health and Sports Performance”. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/special_issues/GSMPPS (accessed on 17 January 2022).
  11. Silva, A.F.; Alvurdu, S.; Akyildiz, Z.; Badicu, G.; Greco, G.; Clemente, F.M. Variations of the Locomotor Profile, Sprinting, Change-of-Direction, and Jumping Performances in Youth Soccer Players: Interactions between Playing Positions and Age-Groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ivanović, J.; Kukić, F.; Greco, G.; Koropanovski, N.; Jakovljević, S.; Dopsaj, M. Specific Physical Ability Prediction in Youth Basketball Players According to Playing Position. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ha, S.; Jeong, H.S.; Park, S.-K.; Lee, S.Y. Can Neurocognitive Function Predict Lower Extremity Injuries in Male Collegiate Athletes? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Africa, E.; Stryp, O.V.; Musálek, M. The Influence of Cultural Experiences on the Associations between Socio-Economic Status and Motor Performance as Well as Body Fat Percentage of Grade One Learners in Cape Town, South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Athayde, M.S.d.S.; Kons, R.L.; Fukuda, D.H.; Detanico, D. Body Size Measurements and Physical Performance of Youth Female Judo Athletes with Differing Menarcheal Status. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Slankamenac, J.; Bjelica, D.; Jaksic, D.; Trivic, T.; Drapsin, M.; Vujkov, S.; Modric, T.; Milosevic, Z.; Drid, P. Somatotype Profiles of Montenegrin Karatekas: An Observational Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Penichet-Tomas, A.; Pueo, B.; Selles-Perez, S.; Jimenez-Olmedo, J.M. Analysis of Anthropometric and Body Composition Profile in Male and Female Traditional Rowers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cattem, M.V.d.O.; Sinforoso, B.T.; Campa, F.; Koury, J.C. Bioimpedance Vector Patterns according to Age and Handgrip Strength in Adolescent Male and Female Athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jeong, H.-C.; So, W.-Y. Difficulties of Online Physical Education Classes in Middle and High School and an Efficient Operation Plan to Address Them. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guillem, C.M.; Loaiza-Betancur, A.F.; Rebullido, T.R.; Faigenbaum, A.D.; Chulvi-Medrano, I. The Effects of Resistance Training on Blood Pressure in Preadolescents and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nunes, J.P.; Jacinto, J.L.; Ribeiro, A.S.; Mayhew, J.L.; Nakamura, M.; Capel, D.M.G.; Santos, L.R.; Santos, L.; Cyrino, E.S.; Aguiar, A.F. Placing Greater Torque at Shorter or Longer Muscle Lengths? Effects of Cable vs. Barbell Preacher Curl Training on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy in Young Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Campa, F.; Silva, A.M.; Matias, C.N.; Monteiro, C.P.; Paoli, A.; Nunes, J.P.; Talluri, J.; Lukaski, H.; Toselli, S. Body Water Content and Morphological Characteristics Modify Bioimpedance Vector Patterns in Volleyball, Soccer, and Rugby Players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Campa, F.; Toselli, S.; Mazzilli, M.; Gobbo, L.A.; Coratella, G. Assessment of Body Composition in Athletes: A Narrative Review of Available Methods with Special Reference to Quantitative and Qualitative Bioimpedance Analysis. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Till, K.; Scantlebury, S.; Jones, B. Anthropometric and Physical Qualities of Elite Male Youth Rugby League Players. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 2171–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. List of papers published in this Special Issue of IJERPH entitled Growth, Somatic Maturation, and Their Impact on Physical Health and Sports Performance [10].
Figure 1. List of papers published in this Special Issue of IJERPH entitled Growth, Somatic Maturation, and Their Impact on Physical Health and Sports Performance [10].
Ijerph 19 01266 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campa, F.; Greco, G. Growth, Somatic Maturation, and Their Impact on Physical Health and Sports Performance: An Editorial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031266

AMA Style

Campa F, Greco G. Growth, Somatic Maturation, and Their Impact on Physical Health and Sports Performance: An Editorial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(3):1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campa, Francesco, and Gianpiero Greco. 2022. "Growth, Somatic Maturation, and Their Impact on Physical Health and Sports Performance: An Editorial" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 3: 1266. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031266

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop