Next Article in Journal
The Carbon Emission Characteristics and Reduction Potential in Developing Areas: Case Study from Anhui Province, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Freshwater Water-Quality Criteria for Chloride and Guidance for the Revision of the Water-Quality Standard in China
Previous Article in Journal
Predictors of Students’ Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Impact of Coping Strategies, Sense of Coherence, and Social Support
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water Quality Criteria and Ecological Risk Assessment of Typical Transition Metals in South Asia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 24
10.3390/ijerph192416426
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

5-Methyltetrahydrofolate Alleviates Memory Impairment in a Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Induced by D-Galactose and Aluminum Chloride

by
Zhengduo Zhang
1,
Hong Wu
1,
Shaojun Qi
1,
Yanjin Tang
1,
Chuan Qin
1,
Rui Liu
1,
Jiacheng Zhang
1,
Yiyao Cao
2,* and
Xibao Gao
1,*
1
Department of Physical and Chemical Inspection, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
2
Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou 310051, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(24), 16426; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416426
Submission received: 21 October 2022 / Revised: 30 November 2022 / Accepted: 5 December 2022 / Published: 7 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Exposure, Health Effects and Risk)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The effects of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) on a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) induced by D-galactose (D-gal) and aluminum chloride (AlCl3) were investigated. Wistar rats were given an i.p. injection of 60 mg/kg D-gal and 10 mg/kg AlCl3 to induce AD and three doses of 1 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF by oral gavage. A positive control group was treated with 1 mg/kg donepezil by gavage. Morris water maze performance showed that 5 and 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF significantly decreased escape latency and increased the number of platform crossings and time spent in the target quadrant for AD rats. The administration of 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF decreased the brain content of amyloid β-protein 1-42 (Aβ1-42) and phosphorylated Tau protein (p-Tau) and decreased acetylcholinesterase and nitric oxide synthase activities. Superoxide dismutase activity, vascular endothelial growth factor level and glutamate concentration were increased, and malondialdehyde, endothelin-1, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and nitric oxide decreased. The administration of 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF also increased the expression of disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 10 mRNA and decreased the expression of β-site amyloid precursor protein cleavage enzyme 1 mRNA. In summary, 5-MTHF alleviates memory impairment in a D-gal- and AlCl3-exposed rat model of AD. The inhibition of Aβ1-42 and p-Tau release, reduced oxidative stress, the regulation of amyloid precursor protein processing and the release of excitatory amino acids and cytokines may be responsible.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of dementia is projected to double in Europe and triple globally by 2050, affecting 131 million people [1,2]. The most common form of dementia is Alzheimer’s disease (AD), an age-dependent neurodegenerative disease associated with metal exposure [3] and accompanied by impaired learning and memory, amyloid precursor protein (APP) and presenilin gene mutations, circadian rhythm disorders [4] and metabolic dysfunction [5]. Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and dyslipidemia exacerbate AD, whereas walking and the Mediterranean diet reduce the risks [2,6]. AD continues to be an issue of concern due to the aging populations and elevated incidences in many countries [7]. Cholinesterase inhibitors and excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists such as donepezil and memantine have been approved for the treatment of AD [8]. Most other anti-amyloid β-proteins (Aβs), anti-Tau proteins and anti-inflammatory drugs have failed to produce positive results during clinical trials or are still in the early stages of clinical research. Therefore, the identification of drugs to treat AD has great practical and social significance.
Folic acid is supplied both from the diet and through intestinal microbial synthesis. It acts as a carrier of one-carbon units during metabolic reactions and protects against neural tube defects, megaloblastic anemia and cancer [9]. Supplementation with folic acid was shown to inhibit AD development and improve patients’ memory during a randomized controlled trial [10]. The possible explanations for this effect include the regulation of epigenetic modification (DNA methylation) [11], metabolism (lowering homocysteine concentration) [12], oxidative stress [13] and other signaling pathways. However, the dietary supplement form of folic acid cannot be converted into the biologically active form, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF), unless methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase is present. About 26% of Chinese people lack this enzyme, reducing the benefits of folic acid supplements. 5-MTHF represents the predominant form of folic acid in human plasma and is the only form that is able to cross the blood–brain barrier [14]. In addition, 5-MTHF bioavailability is approximately seven times higher than that of folic acid [15]. Therefore, supplementation with 5-MTHF may be more beneficial than folic acid.
Little data regarding the effects of 5-MTHF on neurological conditions is available. The potential benefits of 5-MTHF for neuropathy in depressive patients [16] have been reported, but to the best of our knowledge, little is known about its impact on AD. The current study assesses the protective multi-target effects of 5-MTHF on a rat model of AD generated by exposure to D-galactose (D-gal) and aluminum chloride (AlCl3). Learning and memory functions are investigated. Levels of Aβ1-42, phosphorylated Tau protein (p-Tau) and amino acid neurotransmitters are measured and brain acetylcholinesterase (AChE), nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activities, serum oxidative stress and cytokine indices are evaluated. Hippocampal pathological sections and APP processing are also assessed. The aim is to expose potential therapies for AD patients with disorders of folate metabolism and to generate data for drug development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

D-gal (98% purity), AlCl3 (99% purity), 5-MTHF (≥95% purity) and donepezil (≥98% purity) were obtained from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Aspartic acid (Asp), glycine (Gly), glutamate (Glu) and γ-aminobutyric acid (γ-GABA) reference standards (≥98% purity by HPLC) were obtained from Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). AChE, NOS, superoxide dismutase (SOD), nitric oxide (NO) and malondialdehyde (MDA) kits were obtained from the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). Aβ1-42, p-Tau, endothelin-1 (ET-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) ELISA kits were acquired from Jianglai Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Primers for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 10 (ADAM10) and β-site amyloid precursor protein cleavage enzyme 1 (BACE1) were purchased from General Biosystems Co., Ltd. (Anhui, China). Reverse transcription and PCR amplification kits were purchased from Accurate Biological Engineering Co., Ltd. (Hunan, China).

2.2. Animals and Treatments

A total of 72 specific pathogen-free (SPF) male Wistar rats (150–180 g) were acquired from Sibeifu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China, animal certification number: SCXK (Jing) in 2019-0010 and housed at 22 ± 1 °C and 60 ± 5% humidity, with a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle and access to food and water ad libitum. Animals were allowed to adapt for one week in a clean, well-ventilated animal room before the formal experiment. All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Preventive Medicine of Shandong University (ID Number: LL20200802) and were carried out following China’s Animal Care and Use Guidelines. The rats were divided into six groups (n = 12) matched by body weight after adaptive feeding: Control, AD, AD + 1 mg/kg 5-MTHF, AD + 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF, AD + 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF and AD + donepezil groups. The model of AD was established by daily intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 60 mg/kg D-gal and 10 mg/kg AlCl3 for 6 weeks, as described previous [17,18]. AD + 1 mg/kg 5-MTHF, AD + 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF, AD + 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF and AD + donepezil groups were administered 60 mg/kg D-gal and 10 mg/kg AlCl3 intraperitoneally daily for 6 weeks, followed by the gavage of 1 mg/kg 5-MTHF, 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF, 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF and 1 mg/kg donepezil daily for 6 weeks, respectively [19]. Volume-matched saline was administrated to the control group by i.p. injection and gavage. Rats were weighed once a week and dose volumes adjusted according to body weight.

2.3. Morris Water Maze

The Morris water maze was utilized to evaluate learning and memory. It consists of a cylindrical pool with a diameter of 180 cm and a height of 80 cm, including a circular platform (diameter: 14 cm and height: 20 cm) in the second quadrant. A camera was installed above the pool to record swimming trajectories in real-time and transfer data to the operating system. The pool and surroundings were painted black, the four quadrants were indicated by space markers and light was blacked out with a curtain. The water temperature was maintained at 23–25 °C, and the platform was 1–2 cm below the water surface. Rats were put into the water from the four quadrants and the time was recorded to them finding the platform, up to a maximum of 60 s (escape latency). Animals were allowed to rest on the platform for 10 s if they found it within 60 s, but if not, the researcher would guide them to the platform to rest for 10 s and latency was recorded as 60 s. Daily latency was calculated as the mean of four trials. Rats were also put into the water from the fourth quadrant after the platform had been removed to swim for 60 s (probe task). The number of platform crossings and time spent in the target (second) quadrant were automatically recorded through the apparatus.

2.4. Tissue Processing

After the water maze tests were completed, all rats were made to fast for 24 h with water ad libitum. Two rats were chosen at random from each group for cardiac perfusion and brain tissue fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for hematoxylin–eosin (HE) staining. The remaining rats were anesthetized with an i.p. injection of 10% chloral hydrate; blood was taken from the abdominal aorta and the serum separated by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 10 min and stored at −80 °C. Brain tissue and hippocampus were snap-frozen and stored at −80 °C.

2.5. Determination of Aβ1-42, p-Tau, AChE and NOS

Brain tissue was added to saline pre-cooled at 4 °C in a weight:volume ratio of 1:9, 1 mm enzyme-free zirconia grinding beads was added for homogenization before centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant used for measurements of Aβ1-42 and p-Tau concentrations and AChE and NOS activities. Assays were performed using kits in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions.

2.6. Determination of Serum Antioxidant and Cytokine Indices

Then, 5% serum was used to determine SOD activity, 100% for MDA content and 100% for NO concentration; 20% serum was used to determine the VEGF, ET-1, IL-6 and TNF-α levels.

2.7. HE Staining of Hippocampus

Brain tissue was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and hippocampal tissue cut into 3 mm sections with a double-sided blade dehydrated with gradient ethanol (65% ethanol overnight, 75–85–95–100% ethanol for 2 h each) in an embedding box and cleaned in xylene. Tissue blocks were embedded, cut into 5 μm slices and dried on glass slides for 2 h in an oven at 60 °C. Paraffin sections were dewaxed (2 × 5 min washed with xylene), an ethanol gradient applied (100–95–85–75% for (2 min each), stained with HE for 5 min, differentiated in hydrochloric acid/ethanol for 30 s, stained with eosin for 2 min, dehydrated with 95% ethanol (1 min, two times) and absolute ethanol (1 min, two times), washed with xylene and sealed with neutral gum. Sections were washed with running water after hematoxylin, hydrochloric acid/ethanol and eosin application. Pathological changes to the hippocampus were observed with an inverted optical microscope (Olympus, Japan).

2.8. Determination of Brain Amino Acid Neurotransmitters

A 10% homogenate was made by adding 0.1 g brain tissue to 0.9 mL 50% acetonitrile and the supernatant used. Standard amino acid solutions of 5, 10, 50, 100, 200 and 400 μg/mL (300 μL) were measured, and the samples were mixed with 200 μL 0.5 mol/L sodium bicarbonate and 100 μL 0.5% 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and allowed to react in the dark for 55 min at 65 °C. Concentrations of Asp, Glu, Gly and γ-GABA were determined by HPLC (Shimadzu, Japan), with separation by an Intersil ODS-3 C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5.0 μm) at 40 °C. The mobile phase was 0.05 mol/L sodium acetate (solvent A, PH = 6) and 50% acetonitrile (solvent B), with solvent B being increased from 12% to 45% in 0.1–4.0 min, increased from 45% to 60% in 4.0–20.0 min, decreased from 60% to 12% in 20.0–31.0 min and kept at 12% for 4.0 min, at a 1.0 mL/min flow rate. A photodiode array detector and a wavelength of 360 nm were used. The injection volume was 10 μL. Amino acid standard curve parameters are shown in Table 1.

2.9. RT-PCR Determination of the Hippocampal Expression of ADAM10 and BACE1 mRNA

Total RNA was extracted from 3 samples of hippocampal tissue randomly selected from each group, and the concentration and purity were assessed. Genomic DNA was removed and RNA reverse transcribed to cDNA. GAPDH (internal reference) cDNA was diluted 15-fold and ADAM10 and BACE1 cDNA 4-fold to ensure that the appropriate cycle threshold (Ct) was reached in the thermocycler. Primer sequences were as follows: GAPDH Forward: 5′ TCTCTGCTCCCCTCCCTGTTCT 3′; Reverse: 5′ ATCCGTTCACACCGACCTTC 3′; 95 bp; ADAM10 Forward: 5′ CAAAAACACCAGCGTGCCA 3′; Reverse: 5′ TCGTAGGTTGAATTGTCTTCCAT 3′; 93 bp; BACE1 Forward: 5′ GCAGTCAAGTCCATCAAGGC 3′; Reverse: 5′ GGCCGTAGGTATTGCTGAGGA 3′; 194 bp. PCR was performed as follows: preincubation at 95 °C for 30 s; PCR at 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles; melting curve at 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 1 min, increased to 95 °C; cooling at 40 °C for 15 s. Ct values were recorded, and the relative expression of target gene mRNA was calculated.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Experimental results were tested for normality by the Shapiro–Wilk method and normally distributed data expressed as mean ± SEM. Escape latency was analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and other normally distributed and equal variance data by one-way ANOVA. The Bonferroni test was utilized for pairwise comparison. Dunnett’s T3 test was utilized to verify the difference between groups of data with unequal variance. Significant differences were defined as p < 0.05 (two-tails). SPSS 26.0 software was used for all statistical analysis and GraphPad Prism 9.0.0 for the construction of figures.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of 5-MTHF on Memory Dysfunction in a Rat Model of AD

Escape latency gradually decreased with prolonged training time in the spatial navigation task for each group tested (F time = 98.31, p < 0.001; F group = 9.87, p < 0.001). A typical swimming trajectory on the fourth day of training for the six groups of rats is shown in Figure 1. Escape latency was more prolonged for AD rats than for healthy rats by days 2–4 (p < 0.05), indicating successful AD modeling. Time taken to find the target platform in AD rats dosed with 1, 5 or 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF or donepezil was lower than the untreated AD group on days 3–4 (p < 0.05, Figure 2a). Platform crossing number and time spent in the target quadrant were both reduced for AD rats compared with controls (p < 0.01), and all doses of 5-MTHF and donepezil increased these two indicators relative to untreated AD rats (p < 0.05, Figure 2b,c).

3.2. Effects of 5-MTHF on Brain Aβ1-42, p-Tau, AChE and NOS

Differences in brain Aβ1-42 and p-Tau are shown in Figure 3 (F = 16.17, p < 0.001; F = 12.85, p < 0.001). Aβ1-42 increased by 77.2% and p-Tau by 92.1% (p < 0.001) in AD rats relative to controls. Dosing AD rats with 1 mg/kg 5-MTHF reduced Aβ1-42 to 64.1%, with 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF to 64.8%, with 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF to 55.6% and with donepezil to 71.9% compared with untreated AD rats (p < 0.001). Similarly, dosing AD model rats with 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF reduced p-Tau to 66.6%, with 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF to 67.6% and with donepezil to 78.1% compared with untreated model rats (p < 0.05). AChE and NOS activities in the brains of AD rats were about 2.7 and 1.3 times those in controls, respectively (p < 0.001). Supplementation with 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF reduced AChE and NOS activities to 38.4% and 82.9% in the AD model rats (p < 0.05).

3.3. Effects of 5-MTHF on Serum Antioxidant and Cytokine Indices

Serum SOD activity decreased significantly in AD rats to about 77.9% of that of controls (p < 0.001). Treatment with 1 mg/kg 5-MTHF increased SOD by 23.5%, with 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF by 23.0%, with 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF by 30.1% and with donepezil by 36.0% compared with untreated AD rats (p < 0.05, Figure 4a). Serum MDA was about 1.7 times higher in AD rats than in controls (p < 0.001) and was decreased by 29.2% after treatment with 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF, by 30.9% with 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF and by 38.6% with donepezil (p < 0.01, Figure 4b). Levels of serum of ET-1 were 36.2% higher and of NO 35.8% higher in the AD model rats compared with controls (p < 0.001). ET-1 levels were reduced to 77.9% of those in the AD rats by 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF and to 72.1% by 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF (p < 0.01). NO levels were reduced as follows: 1 mg/kg 5-MTHF to 61.4% of values for AD rats, 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF to 56.1%, 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF to 62.2% and donepezil to 61.4% (p < 0.001). Serum TNF-α was 94.4% higher and IL-6 32.6% higher in the AD model than in controls (p < 0.001), but values were reduced as follows: 1 mg/kg 5-MTHF: TNF-α by 22.7%, IL-6 to 80.5%; 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF: TNF-α by 25.6%, IL-6 to 85.7%; 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF: TNF-α by 24.6%, IL-6 to 73.6%; donepezil: TNF-α by 22.9%, IL-6 to 81.3% (p < 0.05 for TNF-α, Figure 4e; p < 0.01 for IL-6, Figure 4f). Serum VEGF also decreased by 44.5% in AD rats compared with controls (p < 0.001) and was increased 1.7-fold by 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF and by 1.4-fold by donepezil treatment (p < 0.05, Figure 4g).

3.4. Effects of 5-MTHF on Hippocampal Neuronal Morphology

No abnormal hippocampal neurons were apparent in healthy rats (Figure 5), and the pyramidal cells of the CA1 region were neatly arranged and compact with clear boundaries. Pyramidal cell numbers decreased in AD rats and a loose, disordered arrangement with atrophied neurons could be seen. Treatment with 5-MTHF and donepezil improved the irregular pyramidal cell structure in the CA1 region.

3.5. Effects of 5-MTHF on Neurotransmitter Levels

Differences in Asp, Glu, Gly and γ-GABA are shown in Table 2 (F = 6.43, p < 0.001; F = 5.63, p < 0.001; F = 5.59, p < 0.001; F = 6.29, p < 0.001). Asp levels increased by 21.7% in AD rats relative to controls (p < 0.001) but were decreased by treatment with 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF to 82.3% and with donepezil to 86.1% (p < 0.05). Glu was 1.3-fold higher, Gly 1.4-fold higher and γ-GABA 1.7-fold higher in healthy rats than in the AD model rats (p < 0.05). Supplementation with 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF increased Glu by 28.0% (p = 0.002). HPLC separation chromatograms are shown in Figure 6.

3.6. Effects of 5-MTHF on Hippocampal ADAM10 and BACE1 mRNA

As shown in Figure 7, the expression of ADAM10 mRNA was lower in the hippocampus of AD model rats than in controls (p < 0.01) but was increased by 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF and donepezil treatment (p < 0.05). Expression of BACE1 mRNA was higher in the hippocampus of AD model rats than in controls (p = 0.007) and was decreased by treatment with 5 and 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

5-MTHF treatment was found to decrease memory dysfunction and restrict Aβ1-42 and p-Tau increases in a rat model of AD induced by D-gal and AlCl3 exposure, and the same treatment also ameliorated cholinergic damage and endothelial cell dysfunction, improved the numbers and structures of pyramidal cells in the hippocampal CA1 region and regulated oxidative stress and excitatory amino acid release.
Morris water maze testing illustrated the increased latency of AD rats, consistent with previous research [20], indicating successful AD modeling. These changes may be explained by the increased expression of Aβ in the brain in response to i.p. D-gal [21], which activates astrocyte proliferation (AS) [22] and causes neuronal damage [23] and memory impairment. Aluminum may inhibit cAMP-PKA-CREB signaling, leading to impaired synaptic plasticity and long-term potentiation damage [24]. The AD rats of the current study took longer to find the platform after 3–4 days than those treated with 1, 5 or 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF. The number of platform crossings and the time spent in the target quadrant were also lower in untreated AD rats compared with the 5-MTHF intervention group. In conclusion, 5-MTHF alleviated the memory dysfunction induced by D-gal and AlCl3 and delayed AD development.
Pathological changes involved in AD typically include senile plaques composed of accumulated Aβ deposits and neurofibrillary tangles containing p-Tau [25]. Aβ1-42 and p-Tau have been previously shown to increase in AD rats [26]. Increased Aβ1-42 may result from the decreased APP promoter methylation caused by AlCl3, which increases APP mRNA and promotes Aβ deposition [27]. In addition, Aβ-induced activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β may cause the hyperphosphorylation of Tau protein [28]. Aβ1-42 and p-Tau were decreased by MTHF supplementation, and 5-MTHF may slow Aβ accumulation and p-Tau production by reducing APP levels and glycogen synthase kinase-3β activation, alleviating memory impairment.
Increased AChE activity was observed in the current cohort of AD rats, in agreement with previous findings [18], and the enzyme hydrolyzes synaptic acetylcholine, leading to cholinergic neurotransmission damage and cognitive decline. The administration of 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF decreased AChE activity. 5-MTHF may function as an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor by decreasing Aβ and promoting the generation of soluble products from APP [29]. NOS activity was elevated in AD rats, similar to previous results [30]. Aβ may stimulate nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) [31] to enhance inducible NOS activity. NOS levels were decreased by 5 and 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF, perhaps due to suppression of the NF-κB pathway.
Oxidative stress has been considered a risk factor for aging and various neurodegenerative diseases, including AD [32]. It may contribute to Aβ production and aggregation and increase p-Tau levels to aggravate AD. Decreased serum SOD activity and increased MDA levels were found in the AD rats of the current study, in agreement with previous work [33]. Increased Aβ may change mitochondrial dynamics and function by binding to the mitochondrial membrane to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) [32], generating oxidative stress. Treatment with 5 and 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF raised serum SOD activity and lessened MDA levels compared with the model group. 5-MTHF may promote Aβ depolymerization, clearing ROS.
Endothelial cells are an essential part of the cardiovascular system, and they synthesize and release a variety of biologically active substances. However, abnormal cytokine secretion may lead to endothelial dysfunction, and this condition has been linked to AD [34]. Endothelial NO and ET-1 regulate vasodilation and contraction, and their levels are known to be higher in AD rats [30], consistent with the current results. Raised NO may result from elevated NOS activity, and ET-1 may be released in response to increased ROS levels [35]. TNF-α and IL-6 were found to be increased in AD rats [36] and VEGF to be decreased [37]. Aβ may activate AS, which stimulates p38 MAPK [38] to trigger NF-κB activation [39] and aggravate the inflammatory response. Aβ also has anti-angiogenic activity, interacting with VEGF receptor 2 to block VEGF-mediated signaling [40]. 5-MTHF treatment reduced serum NO, ET-1, IL-6 and TNF-α and increased VEGF in AD rats, perhaps due to the reduced aggregation of Aβ and AS activation, which ameliorates endothelial and synaptic dysfunction [41].
The hippocampus of the brain’s limbic system is involved in learning, memory and spatial orientation [42], and the CA1 region is the most sensitive to damage. The hippocampal CA1 area has been shown to be atrophied in AD patients compared with normal individuals [43]. Changes to the numbers and arrangements of CA1 pyramidal cells and neuronal atrophy were observed in the AD rats of the present study. Neurotoxic Aβ accumulation may promote apoptosis and neuronal loss [44]. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) may encourage hippocampal circuit plasticity and modulate hippocampal-dependent cognition [45]. AHN dysfunction is prevalent in AD patients and animal models [46]. The therapeutic effects of 5-MTHF during the current study may result from the inhibition of apoptosis and modulation of neurogenesis.
Brain amino acid neurotransmitters contribute to neuronal information transmission and cognitive activity [47]. Excitatory neurotransmitters, such as Asp and Glu, work together with inhibitory neurotransmitters, such as Gly and γ-GABA. Brain Asp levels were increased in AD rats, and Glu, Gly and γ-GABA were decreased [48]. Decreased glutamatergic and γ-GABAergic neuronal metabolism may result, and damage to the cholinergic system may be responsible for the increased release of excitatory Asp. 5-MTHF treatment decreased Asp and increased Glu, indicating the regulation of excitatory amino acids by 5-MTHF. Interestingly, 5-MTHF did not increase Gly and γ-GABA content, perhaps due to an insufficient time scale.
APP metabolism consists of the production of soluble products by the α-secretase ADAM10 and the production of Aβ by the β-secretase BACE1 [49]. Hippocampal ADAM10 and BACE1 mRNA expression levels are considered to be markers for AD progression. ADAM10 mRNA was reduced and BACE1 mRNA increased in the hippocampus of the AD model group, in agreement with previous studies [50]. ADAM10 is degraded by asparagine endopeptidase [51]. BACE1 expression may be upregulated by ROS production and lipid peroxidation following the oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids [52]. 5-MTHF supplementation raised ADAM10 mRNA and decreased BACE1 mRNA and may promote APP metabolism through the soluble product pathway.
A limitation of the current study concerns its multi-target approach to 5-MTHF, which covers a wide range of areas but does not include in-depth mechanistic analyses of AD pathogenesis. Further experiments are planned to scrutinize the mechanistic factors.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, 5-MTHF alleviated memory impairment and restricted increases in Aβ1-42 and p-Tau in a rat model of AD induced by D-gal and AlCl3. SOD activity and VEGF levels were raised, and AChE and NOS activities and MDA, NO, ET-1, IL-6 and TNF-α levels were reduced by 5-MTHF treatment. The numbers and structures of pyramidal cells in the hippocampal CA1 region were restored and excitatory amino acid release and APP processing regulated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and writing—review and editing: X.G. and Y.C.; data curation and software: Z.Z., H.W., S.Q. and Y.T.; formal analysis: Z.Z. and H.W.; supervision: C.Q., R.L. and J.Z.; writing—original draft: Z.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (grant number: 2019GSF107002), the Zhejiang Province Health Science and Technology Program (grant numbers: 2021KY613, 2022RC120), the Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project (grant number: LGC21H260001), and the Zhenan Institute of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Technology Application Open Project (grant number: ZFY-2021-K-003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Preventive Medicine of Shandong University (ID Number: LL20200802) and were carried out following China’s Animal Care and Use Guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely appreciate all participants who have contributed to this research. Moreover, the authors would like to express their gratitude to Figdraw (https://www.figdraw.com/) for the expert drawing services provided on 21 October 2022 and to EditSprings (https://www.editsprings.cn/) for the expert linguistic services provided on 29 November 2022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Scheltens, P.; De Strooper, B.; Kivipelto, M.; Holstege, H.; Chételat, G.; Teunissen, C.E.; Cummings, J.; van der Flier, W.M. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2021, 397, 1577–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Leszek, J.; Mikhaylenko, E.V.; Belousov, D.M.; Koutsouraki, E.; Szczechowiak, K.; Kobusiak-Prokopowicz, M.; Mysiak, A.; Diniz, B.S.; Somasundaram, S.G.; Kirkland, C.E.; et al. The links between cardiovascular diseases and Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2021, 19, 152–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Armstrong, R.A. Risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease. Folia Neuropathol. 2019, 57, 87–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Uddin, M.S.; Tewari, D.; Mamun, A.A.; Kabir, M.T.; Niaz, K.; Wahed, M.I.I.; Barreto, G.E.; Ashraf, G.M. Circadian and sleep dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020, 60, 101046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tawfik, A.; Samra, Y.A.; Elsherbiny, N.M.; Al-Shabrawey, M. Implication of hyperhomocysteinemia in blood retinal barrier (BRB) dysfunction. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, J.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y.S.; Park, S.H. Identifying the relationship between leisure walking and prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Int. J. Environ Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 8076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reitz, C.; Mayeux, R. Alzheimer disease: Epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, risk factors and biomarkers. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 88, 640–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Vaz, M.; Silvestre, S. Alzheimer’s disease: Recent treatment strategies. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 887, 173554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shulpekova, Y.; Nechaev, V.; Kardasheva, S.; Sedova, A.; Kurbatova, A.; Bueverova, E.; Kopylov, A.; Malsagova, K.; Dlamini, J.C.; Ivashkin, V. The concept of folic acid in health and disease. Molecules 2021, 26, 3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, H.; Liu, S.; Ji, L.; Wu, T.; Ji, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, M.; Xu, W.; Huang, G. Folic acid supplementation mitigates Alzheimer’s disease by reducing inflammation: A randomized controlled trial. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 5912146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, T.; Bai, D.; Li, W.; Huang, G.W.; Liu, H. Effects of folic acid on secretases involved in Aβ deposition in APP/PS1 mice. Nutrients 2016, 8, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Chang, H.; Liu, X.; Zhu, R. Homocysteine and folic acid: Risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease-an updated meta-analysis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021, 13, 665114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lv, X.; Zhou, D.; Ge, B.; Chen, H.; Du, Y.; Liu, S.; Ji, Y.; Sun, C.; Wang, G.; Gao, Y.; et al. Association of folate metabolites and mitochondrial function in peripheral blood cells in Alzheimer’s disease: A matched case-control study. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019, 70, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McEneny, J.; Couston, C.; McKibben, B.; Young, I.S.; Woodside, J.V. Folate: In vitro and in vivo effects on VLDL and LDL oxidation. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2007, 77, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Willems, F.F.; Boers, G.H.; Blom, H.J.; Aengevaeren, W.R.; Verheugt, F.W. Pharmacokinetic study on the utilisation of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate and folic acid in patients with coronary artery disease. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 141, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Papakostas, G.I.; Shelton, R.C.; Zajecka, J.M.; Etemad, B.; Rickels, K.; Clain, A.; Baer, L.; Dalton, E.D.; Sacco, G.R.; Schoenfeld, D.; et al. L-methylfolate as adjunctive therapy for SSRI-resistant major depression: Results of two randomized, double-blind, parallel-sequential trials. Am. J. Psychiatry 2012, 169, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Z.; Zhao, G.; Qian, S.; Yang, Z.; Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Cai, C.; Liang, X.; Guo, J. Cerebrovascular protection of β-asarone in Alzheimer’s disease rats: A behavioral, cerebral blood flow, biochemical and genic study. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 144, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abulfadl, Y.S.; El-Maraghy, N.N.; Ahmed, A.A.E.; Nofal, S.; Badary, O.A. Protective effects of thymoquinone on D-galactose and aluminum chloride induced neurotoxicity in rats: Biochemical, histological and behavioral changes. Neurol. Res. 2018, 40, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, X.; Liu, B.; Cui, L.; Zhou, B.; Liu, W.; Xu, F.; Hayashi, T.; Hattori, S.; Ushiki-Kaku, Y.; Tashiro, S.I.; et al. Silibinin ameliorates anxiety/depression-like behaviors in amyloid β-treated rats by upregulating BDNF/TrkB pathway and attenuating autophagy in hippocampus. Physiol. Behav. 2017, 179, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Y.J.; Wang, X.Y.; Hao, X.Y.; Yan, Y.M.; Hong, M.; Wei, S.F.; Zhou, Y.L.; Wang, Q.; Cheng, Y.X.; Liu, Y.Q. Ethanol extract of centipeda minima exerts antioxidant and neuroprotective effects via activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 9421037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, A.; Shah, S.A.; Zaman, N.; Uddin, M.N.; Khan, W.; Ali, A.; Riaz, M.; Kamil, A. Vitamin D exerts neuroprotection via SIRT1/nrf-2/NF-kB signaling pathways against D-galactose-induced memory impairment in adult mice. Neurochem. Int. 2021, 142, 104893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hou, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Ma, H.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, C.; Guan, W.; Ma, Y. The effects of amyloid-β42 oligomer on the proliferation and activation of astrocytes in vitro. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2011, 47, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wu, J.; Wu, H.; Yu, Y.; Qin, Y.; Han, X.; Hou, Y. Progesterone inhibits neuronal damage induced by Aβ-induced astrocyte activation. Chin. Pharmacol. Bull. 2014, 30, 1539–1543. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, L.; Jin, C.; Lu, X.; Yang, J.; Wu, S.; Liu, Q.; Chen, R.; Bai, C.; Zhang, D.; Zheng, L.; et al. Aluminium chloride impairs long-term memory and downregulates cAMP-PKA-CREB signalling in rats. Toxicology 2014, 323, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, X.; Zhou, X.; Li, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Song, W. Modifications and trafficking of APP in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yu, H.; Yuan, B.; Chu, Q.; Wang, C.; Bi, H. Protective roles of isoastilbin against Alzheimer’s disease via Nrf2-mediated antioxidation and anti-apoptosis. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019, 43, 1406–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, X.; Yuan, Y.; Niu, Q. Effects of aluminium chloride on the methylation of app in hippocampal of rats. J. Hyg. Res. 2016, 45, 345–349+355. [Google Scholar]
  28. Blurton-Jones, M.; Laferla, F.M. Pathways by which Abeta facilitates tau pathology. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2006, 3, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nordberg, A. Mechanisms behind the neuroprotective actions of cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2006, 20, S12–S18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, X.M.; Gao, L.; Huo, S.X.; Liu, X.M.; Yan, M. The mechanism of memory enhancement of acteoside (verbascoside) in the senescent mouse model induced by a combination of D-gal and AlCl3. Phytother. Res. 2015, 29, 1137–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Akama, K.T.; Albanese, C.; Pestell, R.G.; Van Eldik, L.J. Amyloid beta-peptide stimulates nitric oxide production in astrocytes through an NFkappaB-dependent mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 5795–5800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Tönnies, E.; Trushina, E. Oxidative stress, synaptic dysfunction, and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 57, 1105–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Y.; Li, Y.Q.; Fang, J.Y.; Li, P.; Li, F. Establishment of the concurrent experimental model of osteoporosis combined with Alzheimer’s disease in rat and the dual-effects of echinacoside and acteoside from Cistanche tubulosa. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 257, 112834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Grammas, P. Neurovascular dysfunction, inflammation and endothelial activation: Implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neuroinflamm. 2011, 25, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Nortley, R.; Korte, N.; Izquierdo, P.; Hirunpattarasilp, C.; Mishra, A.; Jaunmuktane, Z.; Kyrargyri, V.; Pfeiffer, T.; Khennouf, L.; Madry, C.; et al. Amyloid β oligomers constrict human capillaries in Alzheimer’s disease via signaling to pericytes. Science 2019, 365, eaav9518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.Y.; Fan, Y.C.; Wang, M.; Wang, D.; Li, X.H. Atorvastatin attenuates the production of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in the hippocampus of an amyloid β1-42-induced rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Interv. Aging 2013, 8, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zarezadehmehrizi, A.; Hong, J.; Lee, J.; Rajabi, H.; Gharakhanlu, R.; Naghdi, N.; Azimi, M.; Park, Y. Exercise training ameliorates cognitive dysfunction in amyloid beta-injected rat model: Possible mechanisms of Angiostatin/VEGF signaling. Metab. Brain. Dis. 2021, 36, 2263–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saha, P.; Guha, S.; Biswas, S.C. P38K and JNK pathways are induced by amyloid-β in astrocyte: Implication of MAPK pathways in astrogliosis in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 108, 103551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karunakaran, S.; Ravindranath, V. Activation of p38 MAPK in the substantia nigra leads to nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB in MPTP-treated mice: Implication in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2009, 109, 1791–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Patel, N.S.; Mathura, V.S.; Bachmeier, C.; Beaulieu-Abdelahad, D.; Laporte, V.; Weeks, O.; Mullan, M.; Paris, D. Alzheimer’s beta-amyloid peptide blocks vascular endothelial growth factor mediated signaling via direct interaction with VEGFR-2. J. Neurochem. 2010, 112, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martin, L.; Bouvet, P.; Chounlamountri, N.; Watrin, C.; Besançon, R.; Pinatel, D.; Meyronet, D.; Honnorat, J.; Buisson, A.; Salin, P.A.; et al. VEGF counteracts amyloid-β-induced synaptic dysfunction. Cell. Rep. 2021, 35, 109121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Rao, Y.L.; Ganaraja, B.; Murlimanju, B.V.; Joy, T.; Krishnamurthy, A.; Agrawal, A. Hippocampus and its involvement in Alzheimer’s disease: A review. 3 Biotech. 2022, 12, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Su, L.; Hayes, L.; Soteriades, S.; Williams, G.; Brain, S.A.E.; Firbank, M.J.; Longoni, G.; Arnold, R.J.; Rowe, J.B.; O’Brien, J.T. Hippocampal stratum radiatum, lacunosum, and moleculare sparing in mild cognitive impairment. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018, 61, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Amber, S.; Sumera; Mirza, F.J.; Asif, M.; Hassan, D.; Ahmed, T.; Zahid, S. Amyloid-beta induced neurotoxicity impairs cognition and adult hippocampal neurogenesis in a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2020, 17, 1033–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zheng, J. Hippocampal neurogenesis and pro-neurogenic therapies for Alzheimer’s disease. Animal Model. Exp. Med. 2022, 5, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Walgrave, H.; Balusu, S.; Snoeck, S.; Vanden Eynden, E.; Craessaerts, K.; Thrupp, N.; Wolfs, L.; Horré, K.; Fourne, Y.; Ronisz, A.; et al. Restoring miR-132 expression rescues adult hippocampal neurogenesis and memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Stem Cell 2021, 28, 1805–1821.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, C.; Zhang, D. Research progress of amino acid neurotransmitters and nervous system diseases and their therapeutic drugs. Acta Neuropharmacol. 2018, 8, 60. [Google Scholar]
  48. Patel, A.B.; Tiwari, V.; Veeraiah, P.; Saba, K. Increased astroglial activity and reduced neuronal function across brain in AβPP-PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018, 38, 1213–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Silva, M.V.F.; Loures, C.M.G.; Alves, L.C.V.; de Souza, L.C.; Borges, K.B.G.; Carvalho, M.D.G. Alzheimer’s disease: Risk factors and potentially protective measures. J. Biomed. Sci. 2019, 26, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wang, L.; Hu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Niu, Q. Effects of aluminium on β-amyloid (1-42) and secretases (APP-cleaving enzymes) in rat brain. Neurochem. Res. 2014, 39, 1338–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, X.; Tang, L.; Zhang, Z. ADAM10 and ADAM17 are degraded by lysosomal pathway via asparagine endopeptidase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 537, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, L.; Na, R.; Gu, M.; Richardson, A.; Ran, Q. Lipid peroxidation up-regulates BACE1 expression in vivo: A possible early event of amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2008, 107, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 19 16426 g001 550
Figure 1. Typical swimming trajectory in the spatial navigation task for the six groups of rats (day 4). (I) First quadrant, (II) second quadrant, (III) third quadrant and (IV) fourth quadrant.
Figure 1. Typical swimming trajectory in the spatial navigation task for the six groups of rats (day 4). (I) First quadrant, (II) second quadrant, (III) third quadrant and (IV) fourth quadrant.
Ijerph 19 16426 g001
Ijerph 19 16426 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of 5-MTHF on memory dysfunction of AD rats. (a) Latency in the spatial navigation task, (b) number of platform crossings and (c) time spent in the target quadrant. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with controls. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with untreated AD rats.
Figure 2. Effects of 5-MTHF on memory dysfunction of AD rats. (a) Latency in the spatial navigation task, (b) number of platform crossings and (c) time spent in the target quadrant. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with controls. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with untreated AD rats.
Ijerph 19 16426 g002
Ijerph 19 16426 g003 550
Figure 3. Aβ1-42 and p-Tau contents and AChE and NOS activities in brain tissue. (a) Aβ1-42, (b) p-Tau, (c) AChE and (d) NOS. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 compared with controls. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with the model group.
Figure 3. Aβ1-42 and p-Tau contents and AChE and NOS activities in brain tissue. (a) Aβ1-42, (b) p-Tau, (c) AChE and (d) NOS. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 compared with controls. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with the model group.
Ijerph 19 16426 g003
Ijerph 19 16426 g004 550
Figure 4. Serum antioxidant and cytokine indices. Antioxidants: (a) SOD activity and (b) MDA level. Cytokines: (c) ET-1, (d) NO, (e) TNF-α, (f) IL-6 and (g) VEGF. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 compared with controls. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with the model group.
Figure 4. Serum antioxidant and cytokine indices. Antioxidants: (a) SOD activity and (b) MDA level. Cytokines: (c) ET-1, (d) NO, (e) TNF-α, (f) IL-6 and (g) VEGF. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 compared with controls. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with the model group.
Ijerph 19 16426 g004
Ijerph 19 16426 g005 550
Figure 5. Typical HE staining images of the hippocampal CA1 region (magnification 400×). Atrophied neurons are indicated by arrows.
Figure 5. Typical HE staining images of the hippocampal CA1 region (magnification 400×). Atrophied neurons are indicated by arrows.
Ijerph 19 16426 g005
Ijerph 19 16426 g006 550
Figure 6. HPLC separation chromatograms for standard solutions and samples. (1) Asp, (2) Glu, (3) Gly, (4) γ-GABA. (a) Standard solutions, (b) Samples.
Figure 6. HPLC separation chromatograms for standard solutions and samples. (1) Asp, (2) Glu, (3) Gly, (4) γ-GABA. (a) Standard solutions, (b) Samples.
Ijerph 19 16426 g006
Ijerph 19 16426 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of 5-MTHF on the expression of ADAM10 and BACE1 mRNA in the hippocampus of AD rats. (a) ADAM10 mRNA and (b) BACE1 mRNA. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 compared with controls. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with the model group.
Figure 7. Effects of 5-MTHF on the expression of ADAM10 and BACE1 mRNA in the hippocampus of AD rats. (a) ADAM10 mRNA and (b) BACE1 mRNA. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01 compared with controls. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with the model group.
Ijerph 19 16426 g007
Table
Table 1. Regression equations and correlation coefficients for Asp, Glu, Gly and γ-GABA.
Table 1. Regression equations and correlation coefficients for Asp, Glu, Gly and γ-GABA.
Amino AcidRegression EquationCorrelation Coefficient
AspA = 24,412C − 18,4110.9992
GluA = 23,381C − 11,0670.9991
GlyA = 65,655C − 107,2770.9998
γ-GABAA = 46,910C − 91,5130.9992
A: peak area; C: concentration.
Table
Table 2. Amino acid content of rat brain tissue (μg/mL, n = 10).
Table 2. Amino acid content of rat brain tissue (μg/mL, n = 10).
GroupAspGluGlyγ-GABA
Control71.27 ± 2.04235.50 ± 6.8621.62 ± 1.5153.97 ± 2.73
AD86.71 ± 1.30 **188.18 ± 6.38 **15.76 ± 0.43 *31.80 ± 1.46 **
AD + 1 mg/kg 5-MTHF78.08 ± 2.76214.19 ± 6.7616.67 ± 0.7340.40 ± 2.64
AD + 5 mg/kg 5-MTHF71.32 ± 2.45 ##211.58 ± 8.7016.00 ± 0.6641.21 ± 2.59
AD + 10 mg/kg 5-MTHF80.88 ± 3.28240.80 ± 14.94 ##17.91 ± 1.3941.30 ± 5.54
AD + Donepezil74.67 ± 2.90 #204.52 ± 8.1316.78 ± 0.4742.21 ± 2.77
Data are shown as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with controls. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 compared with the model group.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Z.; Wu, H.; Qi, S.; Tang, Y.; Qin, C.; Liu, R.; Zhang, J.; Cao, Y.; Gao, X. 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate Alleviates Memory Impairment in a Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Induced by D-Galactose and Aluminum Chloride. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16426. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416426

AMA Style

Zhang Z, Wu H, Qi S, Tang Y, Qin C, Liu R, Zhang J, Cao Y, Gao X. 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate Alleviates Memory Impairment in a Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Induced by D-Galactose and Aluminum Chloride. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(24):16426. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Zhengduo, Hong Wu, Shaojun Qi, Yanjin Tang, Chuan Qin, Rui Liu, Jiacheng Zhang, Yiyao Cao, and Xibao Gao. 2022. "5-Methyltetrahydrofolate Alleviates Memory Impairment in a Rat Model of Alzheimer’s Disease Induced by D-Galactose and Aluminum Chloride" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 24: 16426. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop