The Influence Mechanism of Political Skill on Safety Voice Behavior in High-Risk Industries: The Mediating Role of Voice Efficacy
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. The Literature Review and Research Hypothesis
2.1. Safety Voice
2.2. Political Skill
2.3. Voice Efficacy
2.4. Research Hypothesis
2.4.1. Employees’ Political Skill and Safety Voice Behavior
2.4.2. The Mediating Role of Voice Efficacy
3. Method
3.1. Research Objects and Procedures
3.2. Measuring Tools
3.2.1. Political Skill
3.2.2. Voice Efficacy
3.2.3. Safety Voice Behavior
3.2.4. Control Variables
3.3. Data Processing
4. Results
4.1. Sample Descriptive Statistics
4.2. Reliability and Validity Analysis
4.2.1. Reliability Analysis of the Scale
4.2.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.3. Analysis of Common Methods Variance
4.4. Correlation Analysis
4.5. Hypothesis Testing
5. Discussion
5.1. Political Skill and Safety Voice
5.2. The Mediating Role of Voice Efficacy
5.3. Theoretical Implications
5.4. Practical Implications
5.5. Limitations and Future Research
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Turner, N.; Tucker, S.; Kelloway, E.K. Prevalence and demographic differences in microaccidents and safety behaviors among young workers in Canada. J. Saf. Res. 2015, 53, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Turner, N.; Tucker, S.; Deng, C. Revisiting vulnerability: Comparing young and adult workers’ safety voice intentions under different supervisory conditions. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 135, 105372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noort, M.C.; Reader, T.W.; Gillespie, A. Safety voice and safety listening during aviation accidents: Cockpit voice recordings reveal that speaking-up to power is not enough. Saf. Sci. 2021, 139, 105260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathisen, G.E.; Tjora, T.; Bergh, L.I.V. Speaking up about safety concerns in high-risk industries: Correlates of safety voice in the offshore oil rig sector. Saf. Sci. 2022, 145, 105487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Luo, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X. Development and validation of employee safety voice scale in the Chinese organizational context. J. Manag. Organ. 2022, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollnagel, E. Is safety a subject for science? Saf. Sci. 2014, 67, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffin, M.A.; Curcuruto, M. Safety Climate in Organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2016, 3, 191–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucker, S.; Turner, N. Sometimes it hurts when supervisors don’t listen: The antecedents and consequences of safety voice among young workers. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2015, 20, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cakir, M.S.; Wardman, J.K.; Trautrims, A. Ethical leadership supports safety voice by increasing risk perception and reducing ethical ambiguity: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Risk Anal. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noort, M.C.; Reader, T.W.; Gillespie, A. Speaking up to prevent harm: A systematic review of the safety voice literature. Saf. Sci. 2019, 117, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Mei, Q.; Liu, S. Study of the influence of employee safety voice on workplace safety level of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Nankai Bus. Rev. Int. 2019, 10, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucker, S.; Chmiel, N.; Turner, N.; Hershcovis, M.S.; Stride, C.B. Perceived organizational support for safety and employee safety voice: The mediating role of coworker support for safety. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2008, 13, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morrow, K.J.; Gustavson, A.M.; Jones, J. Speaking up behaviours (safety voices) of healthcare workers: A metasynthesis of qualitative research studies. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2016, 64, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manapragada, A.; Bruk-Lee, V. Staying silent about safety issues: Conceptualizing and measuring safety silence motives. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2016, 91, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noort, M.C.; Reader, T.W.; Gillespie, A. The sounds of safety silence: Interventions and temporal patterns unmute unique safety voice content in speech. Saf. Sci. 2021, 140, 105289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waring, J.; Bishop, S.; Black, G.; Clarke, J.M.; Exworthy, M.; Fulop, N.J.; Hartley, J.; Ramsay, A.; Roe, B. Understanding the Political Skills and Behaviours for Leading the Implementation of Health Services Change: A Qualitative Interview Study. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 2022, 11, 2686–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, X.; Song, H.Y.; Tang, Y.J. The Relationship Between Political Skill And Employee Voice Behavior From An Impression Management Perspective. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 2015, 31, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mearns, K.; Yule, S. The role of national culture in determining safety performance: Challenges for the global oil and gas industry. Saf. Sci. 2009, 47, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; McChamp, M. Looking at both sides of leader and follower political skill on work outcomes: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Ekon. Istraz. 2019, 32, 824–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ozyilmaz, A.; Erdogan, B.; Karaeminogullari, A. Trust in organization as a moderator of the relationship between self-efficacy and workplace outcomes: A social cognitive theory-based examination. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2017, 91, 181–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, L.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Wu, L. Political skill, supervisor-subordinate guanxi and career prospects in Chinese firms(Article). J. Manag. Stud. 2010, 47, 437–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gist, M.E. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1987, 12, 472–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Geng, Z.; Wang, Y. Linking leader–member exchange to employee voice behavior: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 2021, 49, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eibl, B.; Lang, F.R.; Niessen, C. Employee voice at work: The role of employees’ gender, self-efficacy beliefs, and leadership. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 2020, 29, 570–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.; Yang, B. Who can voice their thoughts? The Role of Voice Efficacy and Inspirational Motivation. Acad. Manag. Proc. 2016, 2016, 15052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, J.; Kwan, H.; Ling, B. The role of voice efficacy in the formation of voice behaviour: A cross-level examination. J. Manag. Organ. 2014, 20, 526–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, J.; Gao, A.; Yang, B. Employees’ critical thinking, leaders’ inspirational motivation, and voice behavior: The mediating role of voice efficacy. J. Pers. Psychol. 2018, 17, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, J.-Y.; Wei, Q.-J. The Structure of Voice Efficacy and its Role in the Formation Mechanism of Employee Voice Behavior. Acta Psychol. Sin. 2012, 44, 972–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sibunruang, H.; Kawai, N. Promoting career growth potential: Political skill, the acquisition of social resources and ingratiation. J. Manag. Organ. 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tung, J. Guanxi and Ethics-A Study of Chinese Management Behaviour. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2012, 9, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.L.H. Chinese cultural and power perspective on information systems: Technological frames and re-frames. Inf. Res. -Int. Electron. J. 2010, 15, 15-4. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, H. The effects of safety-specific transformational leadership and active transactional leadership on mindful safety practice adoption in the Chinese petroleum industry. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2021, 28, 1929–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tucker, S.; Turner, N. Young worker safety behaviors: Development and validation of measures. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morrison, E.W. Employee Voice and Silence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2014, 1, 173–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zohar, D. A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. J. Appl. Psychol. 2000, 85, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofmann, D.A.; Morgeson, F.P.; Gerras, S.J. Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Conchie, S.M.; Taylor, P.J.; Donald, I.J. Promoting Safety Voice With Safety-Specific Transformational Leadership: The Mediating Role of Two Dimensions of Trust. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2012, 17, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crant, J.M. Proactive behavior in organizations. J. Manag. 2000, 26, 435–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonnentag, S. Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 518–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gauld, R.; Horsburgh, S. Healthcare professional perspectives on quality and safety in New Zealand public hospitals: Findings from a national survey. Aust. Health Rev. 2014, 38, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bienefeld, N.; Grote, G. Silence that may kill: When aircrew members don’t speak up and why. Aviat. Psychol. Appl. Hum. Factors 2012, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curcuruto, M.; Griffin, M. Prosocial and proactive “safety citizenship behaviour” (SCB): The mediating role of affective commitment and psychological ownership. Saf. Sci. 2018, 104, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Dyne, L.; Ang, S.; Botero, I.C. Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs. J. Manag. Stud. 2003, 40, 1359–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noort, M.C.; Reader, T.W.; Gillespie, A. Walking the Plank: An Experimental Paradigm to Investigate Safety Voice. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mintzberg, H. The Organization as Political Arena. J. Manag. Stud. 1985, 22, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, K.J.; Kacmar, K.M.; Zivnuska, S.; Shaw, J.D. The impact of political skill on impression management effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 2007, 92, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ferris, G.R.; Treadway, D.C.; Perrewé, P.L.; Brouer, R.L.; Douglas, C.; Lux, S. Political Skill in Organizations. J. Manag. 2007, 33, 290–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrewé, P.L.; Zellars, K.L.; Rossi, A.M.; Ferris, G.R.; Kacmar, C.J.; Liu, Y.; Zinko, R.; Hochwarter, W.A. Political skill: An antidote in the role overload-strain relationship. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2005, 10, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todd, S.Y.; Harris, K.J.; Harris, R.B.; Wheeler, A.R. Career Success Implications of Political Skill. J. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 149, 179–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashforth, B.E.; Kulik, C.; Tomiuk, M.A. How Service Agents Manage the Person—Role Interface. Group Organ. Manag. 2008, 33, 5–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kish-Gephart, J.J.; Detert, J.R.; Treviño, L.K.; Edmondson, A.C. Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 2009, 29, 163–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Detert, J.R.; Burris, E.R. Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Acad. Manag. J. 2007, 50, 869–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tierney, P.; Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Acad. Manag. J. 2002, 45, 1137–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, T.W.H.; Lucianetti, L.; Hsu, D.Y.; Yim, F.H.K.; Sorensen, K.L. You Speak, I Speak: The Social-Cognitive Mechanisms of Voice Contagion. J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 58, 1569–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, T.W.H.; Feldman, D.C. Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework. J. Organ. Behav. 2012, 33, 216–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Detert, J.R.; Edmondson, A.C. Implicit Voice Theories: Taken-for-Granted Rules of Self-Censorship at Work. Acad. Manag. J. 2011, 54, 461–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, L.; Miao, R.; Jiang, L. Employee Political Skill, Supervisor-Subordinate Guanxi, and Work-Family Conflict: The Cross-Level Moderating Role of Family-Friendly Practices. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goffman, E. Impression management: The presentation of self in everyday life. In Down to Earth Sociology: Introductory Readings, 12th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 118–128. [Google Scholar]
- Tetlock, P.E.; Manstead, A.S. Impression Management Versus Intrapsychic Explanations in Social Psychology: A Useful Dichotomy? Psychol. Rev. 1985, 92, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuller, J.B.; Barnett, T.; Hester, K.; Relyea, C.; Frey, L. An exploratory examination of voice behavior from a impression management perspective. J. Manag. Issues 2007, 19, 134–151. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, J.; Farh, C.I.C.; Farh, J.-L. Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination. Acad. Manag. J. 2012, 55, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Treadway, D.C.; A Hochwarter, W.; Ferris, G.R.; Kacmar, C.J.; Douglas, C.; Ammeter, A.P.; Buckley, M. Leader political skill and employee reactions. Leadersh. Q. 2004, 15, 493–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferris, G.R.; Blickle, G.; Schneider, P.B.; Kramer, J.; Zettler, I.; Solga, J.; Noethen, D.; Meurs, J.A. Political skill construct and criterion-related validation: A two-study investigation. J. Manag. Psychol. 2008, 23, 744–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Treadway, D.C.; Breland, J.W.; Adams, G.L.; Duke, A.B.; Williams, L.A. The interactive effects of political skill and future time perspective on career and community networking behavior. Soc. Networks 2010, 32, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Treadway, D.C.; Ferris, G.R.; Duke, A.B.; Adams, G.L.; Thatcher, J.B. The moderating role of subordinate political skill on supervisors’ impressions of subordinate ingratiation and ratings of subordinate interpersonal facilitation. J. Appl. Psychol. 2007, 92, 848–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, C.; Liden, R.C.; Liu, Y.; Wu, J. Blessing or curse: The moderating role of political skill in the relationship between servant leadership, voice, and voice endorsement. J. Organ. Behav. 2021, 42, 987–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nwosu, H.E.; Obidike, P.C.; Ugwu, J.N.; Udeze, C.C.; Okolie, U.C. Applying social cognitive theory to placement learning in business firms and students’ entrepreneurial intentions. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2022, 20, 100602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tangirala, S.; Ramanujam, R. Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Pers. Psychol. 2012, 65, 251–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curcuruto, M.; Strauss, K.; Axtell, C.; Griffin, M.A. Voicing for safety in the workplace: A proactive goal-regulation perspective. Saf. Sci. 2020, 131, 104902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Dyne, L.; LePine, J.A. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad. Manag. J. 1998, 41, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whiting, S.W.; Podsakoff, P.M.; Pierce, J.R. Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008, 93, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dodoo, J.E.; Surienty, L.; Zahidah, S. Safety citizenship behaviour of miners in Ghana: The effect of hardiness personality disposition and psychological safety. Saf. Sci. 2021, 143, 105404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, H.; Shi, X.; Yang, D.; Liu, K. Impact of mindfulness on construction workers’ safety performance: The mediating roles of psychological contract and coping behaviors. Saf. Sci. 2022, 146, 105534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferris, G.R.; Treadway, D.C.; Kolodinsky, R.W.; Hochwarter, W.A.; Kacmar, C.J.; Douglas, C.; Frink, D.D. Development and Validation of the Political Skill Inventory. J. Manag. 2005, 31, 126–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tucker, S.; Turner, N. Safety voice among young workers facing dangerous work: A policy-capturing approach. Saf. Sci. 2014, 62, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, S.; Zhou, X.; Guo, Z.; Li, Z. How Does Leader Narcissism Influence Employee Voice: The Attribution of Leader Impression Management and Leader-Member Exchange. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- González, R.C.; Blanco, P.R.-Z.; Gil, F.; Antino, M. Development and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Political Skill Inventory: A Measurement Invariance Test. Anales De Psicologia 2020, 36, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zellars, K.L.; Perrewé, P.L.; Rossi, A.M.; Tepper, B.J.; Ferris, G.R. Moderating effects of political skill, perceived control, and job-related self-efficacy on the relationship between negative affectivity and physiological strain. J. Organ. Behav. 2008, 29, 549–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burris, E.R.; Sluss, D.M.; Ployhart, R.E.; Cobb, M.G.; Ashforth, B.E. The Risks and Rewards of Speaking Up: Managerial Responses to Employee Voice. Acad. Manag. J. 2012, 55, 851–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blickle, G.; Meurs, J.A.; Zettler, I.; Solga, J.; Noethen, D.; Kramer, J.; Ferris, G.R. Personality, political skill, and job performance. J. Vocat. Behav. 2008, 72, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genau, H.A.; Blickle, G.; Schütte, N.; Meurs, J.A. Machiavellian leader effectiveness: The moderating role of political skill. J. Pers. Psychol. 2022, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazzoli, A.; Curcuruto, M. Safety leadership and safety voices: Exploring the mediation role of proactive motivations. J. Risk Res. 2020, 24, 1368–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandura, A. On the Functional Properties of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited. J. Manag. 2012, 38, 9–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Varela, A.J.; Van Asselt, K.W. The relationship between psychosocial factors and reported disability: The role of pain self-efficacy. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2022, 23, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hua, J.; Howell, J.L. Coping self-efficacy influences health information avoidance. J. Health Psychol. 2020, 27, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, Y.H.; Verma, S.K.; Chang, W.R.; Courtney, T.K.; Lombardi, D.A.; Brennan, M.J.; Perry, M.J. Supervisor vs. employee safety perceptions and association with future injury in US limited-service restaurant workers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2012, 47, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuller, J.B.; Marler, L.E.; Hester, K. Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: Exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J. Organ. Behav. 2006, 27, 1089–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, P.C.; Stone, E.R. Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: Evidence for a confidence heuristic. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2004, 17, 39–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Whiting, S.W.; Maynes, T.D.; Podsakoff, N.P.; Podsakoff, P.M. Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 2012, 97, 159–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herachwati, N.; Sulistiawan, J.; Alfirdaus, Z. Safety supports on employee safety voice. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2018, 16, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yan, T.T.; Tangirala, S.; Vadera, A.K.; Ekkirala, S. How employees learn to speak up from their leaders: Gender congruity effects in the development of voice self-efficacy. J. Appl. Psychol. 2021, 107, 650–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Cronbach a Coefficient | Number of Items |
---|---|---|
Political skill | 0.919 | 18 |
Voice efficacy | 0.828 | 7 |
Safety voice behavior | 0.814 | 5 |
Model | RMR | RMSEA | CFI | IFI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Three-factor model | 1.675 | 0.033 | 0.053 | 0.909 | 0.910 |
Two-factor model 1 | 1.921 | 0.038 | 0.061 | 0.875 | 0.876 |
Two-factor model 2 | 2.160 | 0.044 | 0.069 | 0.842 | 0.844 |
Two-factor model 3 | 1.835 | 0.037 | 0.058 | 0.887 | 0.888 |
Single factor model | 2.271 | 0.044 | 0.072 | 0.827 | 0.829 |
Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | |||||||
2 | 0.01 | 1 | ||||||
3 | 0.02 | −0.17 ** | 1 | |||||
4 | 0.01 | 0.84 ** | −0.20 ** | 1 | ||||
5 | −0.11 | 0.16 * | 0.10 | 0.21 ** | 1 | |||
6 | 0.00 | 0.06 | −0.06 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
7 | −0.13 * | 0.10 | −0.04 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.74 ** | 1 | |
8 | −0.05 | 0.10 | −0.03 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.56 ** | 0.66 ** | 1 |
Regression Equation (N = 245) | Goodness of Fit Index | Significance of the Coefficient | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predicted Variable | Predictor Variable | R | R2 | B | t | |
Safety voice | 0.57 | 0.32 | 18.65 ** | |||
Gender | −0.06 | −0.73 | ||||
Age | 0.09 | 1.21 | ||||
Education | 0.01 | 0.10 | ||||
Working years | −0.06 | −0.65 | ||||
Position | 0.05 | 0.92 | ||||
Political skill | 0.70 | 10.31 ** | ||||
Voice efficacy | 0.75 | 0.57 | 51.58 ** | |||
Gender | −0.15 | −2.92 * | ||||
Age | −0.00 | −0.09 | ||||
Education | 0.01 | 0.34 | ||||
Working years | 0.05 | 0.80 | ||||
Position | 0.04 | 1.20 | ||||
Political skill | 0.76 | 17.08 ** | ||||
Safety voice | 0.67 | 0.45 | 28.04 ** | |||
Gender | 0.04 | 0.61 | ||||
Age | 0.09 | 1.39 | ||||
Education | −0.00 | −0.05 | ||||
Working years | −0.09 | −1.12 | ||||
Position | 0.02 | 0.42 | ||||
Voice efficacy | 0.68 | 7.60 ** | ||||
Political skill | 0.19 | 2.05 * |
Effect | Standard Error | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | Relative Effect Value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mediation effect | 0.52 | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.70 | 73.34% |
Direct effect | 0.19 | 0.11 | −0.03 | 0.39 | 26.66% |
Total effect | 0.70 | 0.08 | 0.53 | 0.85 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sun, Y.; Chen, J.; Qian, C.; Luo, X.; Wu, X. The Influence Mechanism of Political Skill on Safety Voice Behavior in High-Risk Industries: The Mediating Role of Voice Efficacy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316162
Sun Y, Chen J, Qian C, Luo X, Wu X. The Influence Mechanism of Political Skill on Safety Voice Behavior in High-Risk Industries: The Mediating Role of Voice Efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(23):16162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316162
Chicago/Turabian StyleSun, Yunfeng, Jianwu Chen, Chongyang Qian, Xiaowei Luo, and Xiang Wu. 2022. "The Influence Mechanism of Political Skill on Safety Voice Behavior in High-Risk Industries: The Mediating Role of Voice Efficacy" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23: 16162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316162