Review Reports
- Sergio Nuñez de Arenas-Arroyo1,
- Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno1,2,* and
- Iván Cavero-Redondo1,2
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Elena Bueno-Gracia Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
ijerph-1940926
The effect of neurodynamic techniques on the dispersion of intraneural oedema: A systematic review with meta-analysis
This article is straightforward and easy to read. It focuses on a common neurological problem with interest to orthopedic and neurological surgeons, too.
Unfortunately, the number of meta-analyzed studies is rather low.
Minor points:
Abstract, line 17: ... we ... searched ... past tense
Major points:
1. A more detailed comparison of the excluded study [Schmid et al.] in "living" humans compared to your group would have been a most interesting point to discuss. It strenghthens your results concerning the clinical implications.
Figures
Figure 1: The legend doubles Figure 1. How can you identify 4 records and exclude 15 ?
Figure 2 is not clearly lisible in the present layout.
Table 1: is not cited in the text. The legend is confusing / inadequate. Is there a standard deviation to age / height / weight ?
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf