Next Article in Journal
Influence of Primary Palatal Surgery on Craniofacial Morphology in Patients with Cleft Palate Only (CPO)—Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Sexually Explicit Material and Its Relationship with Sociodemographic Variables, Sexual Satisfaction, and Relationship Satisfaction in a Spanish Sample
Previous Article in Journal
High Frequency of Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) in the Lerma River Basin, Mexico
Previous Article in Special Issue
Substance Use in Sexual Relationships: Association with Sexual Assertiveness and Sexual Satisfaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Temporal Trends and Differences in Sexuality among Depressed and Non-Depressed Adults in the United States

1
Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510317, China
2
School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(21), 14010; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114010
Submission received: 29 September 2022 / Revised: 26 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 27 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sexual Functioning, Sexual Satisfaction and Health)

Abstract

:
This study aimed to examine temporal trends and differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed adults aged 18–59 in the United States from 2005 to 2016. A total of 21,437 people (5432 with depression) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. From 2005–2008 to 2013–2016, the average age at first sexual intercourse decreased, while the proportion of normal frequency of sexual activity and heterosexual sexual orientation increased among all the participants. Some differences in sexuality were found between the depressed and non-depressed groups. The average age at first sexual intercourse (p < 0.001), the proportion of normal frequency of sexual activity (p < 0.001), and heterosexual sexual orientation (p < 0.001) were lower in depressed participants, and the differences did not change over time (pfor trend = 0.926 of average age at first sexual intercourse, pfor trend = 0.823 of normal frequency of sexual activity, pfor trend = 0.926 of heterosexual sexual orientation). Moreover, these differences were associated with marital status (pfor interaction < 0.001 by average age at first sexual intercourse), employment status (pfor interaction < 0.001 by average age at first sexual intercourse), education status (pfor interaction = 0.023 by heterosexual sexual orientation) and family income status (pfor interaction = 0.013 by average age at first sexual intercourse and pfor interaction = 0.017 by normal frequency of sexual activity). In conclusion, the study found that the age at first sexual intercourse decreased and the frequency of sexual intercourse increased in all the participants, and differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed participants were present; however, these differences had no further increase or decrease during the 12-year period. These differences were associated with marital status, employment status, education status, and family income status. These findings show differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed patients but are somewhat different from previous studies; the results may provide directions for future research and social work.

1. Introduction

Sexual health is a state of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to sexuality [1]. Many previous studies have verified that sexuality is vital to proper and healthy human development [2]. Sexuality has been proven to be related to unwanted pregnancies, physical health [1,3], risk of fatal coronary events [4], cancers [5], sexually transmitted diseases (STDS) [6,7,8,9], mental health, and quality of life [10]. Sexual minorities (homoerotism, bisexual) carry a greater risk of suffering from chronic disease, suicide attempts, and all-cause mortality than heterosexuals [11,12,13]. Similarly, a younger age at first sexual intercourse can also cause more unintended pregnancies and HPV transmission and higher prevalence ratios for precancerous lesions among women [14,15,16].
Sexuality is influenced by the interaction of biological, psychological, social, economic, political, cultural, legal, historical, religious, and spiritual factors. Many studies have proven that depression is associated with sexual activity, sexual orientation, and age at first sexual intercourse [17,18,19]. A high rate of depressive disorder and depressive symptoms was demonstrated in minority youth and adolescents with experience of sexual intercourse [19,20]. Depression could cause severe sexual dysfunction, and sexuality was also believed to be a key factor for depression [21,22,23]. Given the strong association between sexuality and depression, as well as the increasing prevalence of depression in recent years, describing the temporal trends of sexuality between depressed and non-depressed individuals becomes particularly important for public health. However, there are still no studies showing the trends and differences in the related indicators of sexual frequency, sexual orientation, and time of first sexual intercourse between depressed and non-depressed people. We aimed to explore these differences by using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and to assess whether these differences are related to age, race/ethnicity, marital status, employment status, education status, and family income status.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Study Population

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used for this research. The NHANES collects participant-reported data from a nationally representative sample of US residents. The complete protocols and methods have been previously reported. In this analysis, data from people aged between 18 and 59 were extracted from the three 4-year NHANES cycles conducted between 2005 and 2016. The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) scale was used to define depression in our study. The respondents were asked 9 questions about specific symptoms, assigning values of 0 to 3 points (0—not at all, 1—several days, 2—more than half of the days, 3—nearly every day), with a higher score on each item representing more frequently being affected by the symptom [24]. PHQ-9 has been demonstrated to be a reliable predictor of depression and a score ≥ 5 indicates the presence of depression [24]. Any missing answers to the 9 questions were considered incomplete data and were excluded in our study. All the participants with a PHQ-9 score greater than 5 were defined as depressed, while others were defined as non-depressed.

2.2. Definition of Sexuality and Other Variables

We assessed sexuality in terms of age at first sexual intercourse, frequency of sexual activity, and sexual orientation. Age at first sexual intercourse was assessed by asking the participants how old they were when they first had sex. Frequency of sexual activity was assessed by asking how many times they had sex per year. Having sex between 52 and 365 times a year was defined as normal, while having sex less than 52 times or more than 365 times a year was defined as abnormal. Sexual orientation was assessed by asking how participants would describe their sexual orientation. In any of these questions, participates who refused to answer the question or answered “don’t know” were considered as missing data.
Information on age, race/ethnicity (including Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Others), and marital status (including married, living with partner, never married, widowed, divorced or separated) was collected. Married or living with a partner were defined as living together, while being never married, widowed, divorced, or separated was defined as living alone). Employment status (including employed and unemployed) and education status (including below high school, high school graduate or general educational development, and some college or above) were extracted from the NHANES database. The Poverty Impact Ratio (PIR) was used to estimate family income status (<1.3 was considered comfortable, while ≥3.5 was considered poor) [25].

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Means were estimated for risk factors measured on a continuous scale, and the proportion was estimated for categorical variables.
Differences in sexuality between the depressed and non-depressed participants were computed by using a multi-variable logistic regression model. To examine the temporal trends for sexuality, p values for differences between the depressed and non-depressed participants across calendar periods were derived by adding an interaction term between depression and calendar period to the model. For each type of sexuality, respondents with missing data were excluded from the analyses.
Subgroup analyses were conducted by age group (18–38, 39–59 years old), race/ethnicity, marital status, employment status, education status, and family income status. To assess whether sexuality differences between the depressed and non-depressed participants in temporal trends differed from the subgroups above, we added three-way interaction terms (depression, calendar period, and subgroup variables) to the model.
To obtain nationally representative values, all analyses were weighted using the NHANES sample weights, thus taking account of the complex sampling design. Analyses were performed in R version 4.1.2.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of 21,437 (5432 with depression) participants using data from the NHANES 2005–2016. Similar distributions existed in age group, race/ethnicity, marital status, employment status, education status, and family income status between depressed and non-depressed individuals. Compared with the non-depressed group, there were more women (59.94% vs. 47.93%) in the depressed group. The proportion of PIR < 1.30 in the depressed group was higher than that in the non-depressed group (31.61% vs. 18.31%), while the proportion of PIR ≥ 3.50 was lower than that in the non-depressed group (27.98% vs. 44.96%). Results from the 2005–2008, 2009–2012, and 2013–2016 periods are provided in Tables S1–S3 in the Supplementary Materials.

3.2. Trends of Sexuality from 2005–2008 to 2013–2016

From 2005–2008 to 2013–2016, the average age at first sexual intercourse decreased from 16.65 to 16.46 for depressed participants and from 17.59 to 17.43 for non-depressed participants. The proportion of normal frequency of sexual activity increased from 24.13% to 25.47% in depressed participants and 28.09% to 29.74% in non-depressed participants. The proportion of heterosexual sexual orientation in both groups also changed, with an increasing proportion from 62.88% to 68.48% in depressed participants and from 70.89% to 77.49% in non-depressed participants (Figure 1).

3.3. Differences in Sexuality between Depressed and Non-Depressed Participants

Significant differences existed in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed participants. The average age at first sexual intercourse in the depressed group was nearly 1 year lower than that in the non-depressed group (16.50 vs. 17.46, p < 0.001), and the proportions of normal frequency of sexual activity and heterosexual sexual orientation were 5.3% (24.21% vs. 29.44%, p < 0.001) and 9.42% (66.10% vs. 75.51%, p < 0.001) lower than those in the non-depressed group, respectively (Table 2). Although the three indicators of sexuality changed, the differences between depressed and non-depressed participants did not increase or decrease over time (pfor trend = 0.823 of average age at first sexual intercourse, pfor trend = 0.926 of normal frequency of sexual activity, pfor trend = 0.926 of heterosexual sexual orientation; Table 3).

3.4. Subgroup Analysis of Differences in Sexuality

The difference in the average age at first sexual intercourse was found to be associated with marital status (pfor interaction < 0.001), employment status (pfor interaction < 0.001), and family income status (pfor interaction = 0.013). Regardless of marital status, employment status, or family income status, depressed participants had a lower average age at first sexual intercourse than non-depressed participants, and the differences were statistically significant (Table 3, Figure 2A–C).
The difference in the normal frequency of sexual activity was of marginal significance by education status (pfor interaction = 0.062) and was found to be influenced by family income status (pfor interaction = 0.017, Table 3). Among participants who had received a high school or general educational development diploma (p = 0.009) or had moderate to high PIR (p = 0.019 for PIR ≤ 1.3 and p = 0.009 for 1.3 < PIR < 3.5), depressed participants were more likely to have a normal frequency of sexual activity than non-depressed participants, while non-depressed participants were more likely to have a normal frequency of sexual activity among those who had received a college degree (p = 0.033) or had a low PIR (p = 0.036) (Table 3, Figure 2D–E). The proportion of normal frequency of sexual activity was also higher among depressed participants with an education status of below high school; the difference nearly reached a statistically significant level (p = 0.053, Table 3, Figure 2D). Moreover, among participants with a PIR ≥ 3.5, the depressed participants were less likely to have a normal frequency of sexual activity than the non-depressed participants; the difference nearly reached statistical significance (p = 0.036, Table 3, Figure 2E).
The difference in the proportion of heterosexual sexual orientation was also found to be influenced by education status (pfor interaction = 0.023, Table 3). Among participants with a college degree or above, the proportion of heterosexual orientation was lower among those with depression, while the opposite phenomenon was found in those with lower educational levels (Table 3, Figure 2). This means that participants with high levels of education represented a higher proportion of sexual minorities in the depressed than in the non-depressed group, while participants with only low–moderate education levels represented a lower proportion of sexual minorities in the depressed group.

4. Discussion

Our study shows trends and differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed adults aged 18–59 years in the United States from 2005 to 2016. The average age at first sexual intercourse decreased in both groups, while the proportion of normal frequency of sexual activity and the proportion of heterosexual orientation increased. Compared with non-depressed participants, depressed participants were younger at their first sexual intercourse and had a lower proportion of normal frequency of sexual activity and heterosexual orientation. However, differences in sexuality between the two groups did not change over time. In addition, our study found that the differences in sexuality between the two groups were associated with marital status, education status, employment status, and family income status.
Previous researchers have shown that having sex for the first time between the ages of 16 and 24 is associated with better physical and mental health and a lower risk of depression [19,26]. In our study, the average age at first sexual intercourse was 16.5 years in depressed patients and 17.5 years in non-depressed participants, which is consistent with previous studies. The results also suggest that delaying the age at first intercourse may be beneficial to health, similar to the findings of previous studies [27]. According to our results, the average age at first sexual intercourse decreased between 2005 and 2013, which was matched by an increase in the proportion of participants in the depression group and in part reflected the potential association between early sexual intercourse and depression. Engaging in sexual activity at a younger age may indicate the presence of less comprehensive sexual education programs and can increase the incidence of STDs, especially in the United States compared to other western nations [28,29]. In addition, women are more likely to be subjected to coercion, abuse, and even unintended pregnancy and abortion in their early years, and, due to physiological differences, they are more sensitive to emotional stimuli than men, which leads to a greater prevalence of depression [30,31].
Marital status, education status, employment status, and family income status have long been reported to be related to depression [32,33,34], but few studies have focused on the relationship between these factors and age at first sexual intercourse. Previous studies have found that young people in the United States are increasingly delaying their first sexual activity [35]. This seems to be at odds with our findings, but it was consistent that depressed people experienced their first sexual activity at an earlier age. These results may suggest that the effect of depression on sexuality may work in both directions: it is possible to engage in sexual activity too early and become depressed, or to delay sexual activity because of depression. Further prospective studies are needed to explore the exact link.
Inconsistently with previous studies, the frequency of sexual activity increased from 2005 to 2016 [36]. This may be due to differences in the timing of the survey and the frequency at which normal sex was defined. It is not possible to generalize the finding that the frequency of sexual activity increased. Our results only showed a slight increase in the proportion of people having sex more than once per week, and we did not calculate the frequency of sexual activity by age. Our results also show that depressed participants were less likely to report having sex at least once a week than non-depressed participants. Sexual activity can lower the heart rate and blood pressure [4,37] while also reducing stress by promoting oxytocin release [38]; less sex is associated with increased mortality and self-reported poor health [39,40], so maintaining a certain frequency of sexual activity is beneficial to improve mood and promote psychosomatic health. Previous studies showed that the average frequency of sexual activity for American 20-year-olds is 80 times per year, while that for 60-year-olds is 20 times per year [36]. Based on this, it can be inferred that the normal frequency of sexual activity for middle-aged American adults (around 40 years old) is 50 times per year. Therefore, considering that the average age of the participants was around 39, it is reasonable that we defined a normal frequency of sexual activity as at least once a week, and the results are credible. Moreover, a previous study and clinical practice also found that an active sex life is detrimental to health, and frequent sex may indicate potential psychological problems and increase the risk of organ damage, cardiovascular disease, or depression [41]. Therefore, it is possible to classify participants who have sex more than 365 times per year as abnormal. However, the results of this study can only show that there is a difference in sexual frequency between depressed and non-depressed participants, and it cannot be concluded that low sexual frequency causes depression or that depression reduces sexual frequency. It is necessary to use a large sample size and a prospective study to further elucidate the causal relationship between depression and the frequency of sexual activity and to explore the optimal frequency of sexual activity.
Previous studies have shown that those with a lower economic status (including no job, low income, low education level) are more likely to engage in unhealthy sexual behavior and have a lower frequency of sexual activity [42,43], which is not exactly consistent with our findings. Our results also suggested that the proportion of normal sexual activity was lower in the low-education subgroup, whereas only non-depressed participants showed a reduction in the proportion of normal sexual activity in the low-income subgroup analysis, and the opposite was true for depressed participants. This phenomenon reflects the unclear cause-and-effect relationship between depression, sexual activity frequency, and income statues; however, it could also reflect the notion that the effect of depression on sexuality among people with different education levels and PIR is inconsistent.
Sexual orientation, especially sexual minorities, is also strongly associated with depression [17,44]. Considering that there may be various reasons for participants to hide their sexual orientation when completing the survey, we calculated the proportion of participants who reported their orientation as heterosexual, which indirectly reflected the proportion of minorities. Our results also showed that the depressed group included a lower proportion of heterosexual individuals, which means a higher proportion of sexual minorities. Sexual minorities have a higher incidence of STDs, which may increase the risk of depression [45]. In addition, depression caused by poor relationships with the opposite sex may also lead to a change in sexual orientation. An interesting observation of our study was that, among highly educated participants, the proportion of heterosexual sexual orientation was lower in the depressed group than in the non-depressed group. Participants with higher education degrees may have faced more stress and had more open sexual attitudes, which could explain the results. Although the causal relationship between sexual orientation, depression, and education level is also not clear, this conclusion suggests that sexual orientation and depression among students at different levels of school is a social issue worthy of attention.

4.1. Strength

The strengths of this study lie in the comprehensive nature of the analysis. It provides detailed, reliable, and nationally representative temporal findings on the differences in sexuality among depressed and non-depressed individuals in the US. The NHANES surveys are large and subject to rigorous quality control, and, as such, they represent a high-quality data source. Our results demonstrate differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed individuals, helping to identify potential depression-related factors and providing guidance for future research.

4.2. Limitations

This study also has some limitations. First, the NHANES was a cross-sectional study, and some data are not available, such as the order in which depression and sexual activity occurred. In addition, some other symptoms could also influence sexuality, and there might also be an interaction occurring between age, race/ethnicity, marital status, employment status, education status, and family income status that we have not taken into account; therefore, our results cannot accurately show the causal relationship between these factors, sexuality, and depression, but can only reflect some correlation. Secondly, each survey included data from a different sample of participants, so sampling error could affect the comparisons over time. We weighted our results according to recommendations, so as to minimize the sampling error. Thirdly, some data from the NHANES are self-reported, leading to a higher potential for misreporting than in raw clinical data.

5. Conclusions

From 2005–2008 to 2013–2016, the average age at first sexual intercourse decreased while the proportion of normal frequency of sexual activity and heterosexual sexual orientation increased among both depressed and non-depressed participants. Differences in sexuality were present between depressed and non-depressed individuals, but the differences did not change over time. The average age at first sexual intercourse and the proportions of normal frequency of sexual activity and heterosexual sexual orientation were lower in depressed participants, and the differences between depressed and non-depressed participants were associated with marital status, employment status, education status, and family income status. Our study provides detailed and nationally representative findings on the differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed adults in the United States. A prospective study with a large sample size should be conducted to examine the associations between socioeconomic factors, depression, and sexuality in the future, and to further explore the optimal sexuality model.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph192114010/s1. The supporting information including Table S1: Differences between Depressed and Non-depressed in 2005–2008; Table S2: Differences between Depressed and Non-depressed in 2009–2012; Table S3: Differences between Depressed and Non-depressed in 2013–2016.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.L. and Y.W.; data collection, W.L. and Y.W.; methodology and validation, Y.W., M.X., Y.L. and H.Z.; formal analysis, Y.W.; supervision and project administration, H.M. and Q.G.; writing—original draft preparation, W.L. and Y.W.; funding acquisition, H.M. and Q.G.; review and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Guangzhou Science and Technology Basic and Applied Basic Research Project (No.2021020803688), the Hospital Application Foundation to Clinical Transformation Study of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (2017zh05), the National Key R&D Program of China (No.2018YFC2001805), and the High-level Hospital Construction Project of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Nos. DFJH201922, DFJH2020003, and DFJH2020029).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate all the efforts made by the staff of the NCHS at the CDC for making the NHANES database publicly available online, and all the participants in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cao, C.; Yang, L.; Xu, T.; Cavazos-Rehg, P.A.; Liu, Q.; McDermott, D.; Veronese, N.; Waldhoer, T.; Ilie, P.C.; Shariat, S.F.; et al. Trends in Sexual Activity and Associations with All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Among US Adults. J. Sex. Med. 2020, 17, 1903–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stokłosa, I.; Stokłosa, M.; Porwolik, M.; Bugajski, M.; Więckiewicz, G.; Piegza, M.; Męcik-Kronenberg, T.; Gorczyca, P. Analysis of High-Risk Sexual Behavior among Polish University Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miner, M.; Esposito, K.; Guay, A.; Montorsi, P.; Goldstein, I. Cardiometabolic Risk and Female Sexual Health: The Princeton III Summary. J. Sex. Med. 2012, 9, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ebrahim, S.; May, M.; Ben Shlomo, Y.; McCarron, P.; Frankel, S.; Yarnell, J.; Smith, G.D. Sexual intercourse and risk of ischaemic stroke and coronary heart disease: The Caerphilly study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2002, 56, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hayes, R.; Pottern, L.M.; Strickler, H.; Rabkin, C.; Pope, V.; Swanson, G.M.; Greenberg, R.S.; Schoenberg, J.B.; Liff, J.; Schwartz, A.G.; et al. Sexual behaviour, STDs and risks for prostate cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2000, 82, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. De Martel, C.; Plummer, M.; Vignat, J.; Franceschi, S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 141, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Perz, J.F.; Armstrong, G.L.; Farrington, L.A.; Hutin, Y.J.; Bell, B.P. The contributions of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections to cirrhosis and primary liver cancer worldwide. J. Hepatol. 2006, 45, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. The AIDS-defining Cancer Project Working Group for IeDEA; COHERE in EuroCoord. Comparison of Kaposi Sarcoma Risk in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Adults Across 5 Continents: A Multiregional Multicohort Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 65, 1316–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sarma, A.V.; McLaughlin, J.C.; Wallner, L.P.; Dunn, R.L.; Cooney, K.; Schottenfeld, D.; Montie, J.E.; Wei, J.T. Sexual Behavior, Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Prostatitis: The Risk of Prostate Cancer in Black Men. J. Urol. 2006, 176, 1108–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Smith, L.; Yang, L.; Veronese, N.; Soysal, P.; Stubbs, B.; Jackson, S.E. Sexual Activity is Associated with Greater Enjoyment of Life in Older Adults. Sex. Med. 2019, 7, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Patterson, J.G.; Jabson, J.M. Sexual orientation measurement and chronic disease disparities: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009–2014. Ann. Epidemiol. 2018, 28, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Marti-Pastor, M.; Perez, G.; German, D.; Pont, A.; Garin, O.; Alonso, J.; Gotsens, M.; Ferrer, M. Health-related quality of life inequalities by sexual orientation: Results from the Barcelona Health Interview Survey. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. VanKim, N.A.; Erickson, D.J.; Eisenberg, M.E.; Lust, K.; Rosser, B.R.S.; Laska, M.N. Relationship between weight-related behavioral profiles and health outcomes by sexual orientation and gender. Obesity 2016, 24, 1572–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Pires, R.; Araújo-Pedrosa, A.; Pereira, J.; Canavarro, M.C. How Can Unintended Pregnancies Be Prevented among Adolescents Who Engaged in Sexual Intercourse at Earlier Ages? The Role of Female Education and Partner Age Difference. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Remschmidt, C.; Fesenfeld, M.; Kaufmann, A.M.; Deleré, Y. Sexual behavior and factors associated with young age at first intercourse and HPV vaccine uptake among young women in Germany: Implications for HPV vaccination policies. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Xavier-Júnior, J.C.C.; Dufloth, R.M.; Vale, D.B.; de Lima, M.T.; Zeferino, L.C. Early Age at First Sexual Intercourse is Associated with Higher Prevalence of High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (HSIL). Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia 2017, 39, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lucassen, M.F.; Stasiak, K.; Samra, R.; Frampton, C.M.; Merry, S.N. Sexual minority youth and depressive symptoms or depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Aust. N. Zeal. J. Psychiatry 2017, 51, 774–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Denny, S.; Lucassen, M.F.G.; Stuart, J.; Fleming, T.; Bullen, P.; Peiris-John, R.; Rossen, F.V.; Utter, J. The Association Between Supportive High School Environments and Depressive Symptoms and Suicidality Among Sexual Minority Students. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 2016, 45, 248–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vasilenko, S.A.; Kugler, K.C.; Rice, C.E. Timing of First Sexual Intercourse and Young Adult Health Outcomes. J. Adolesc. Health 2016, 59, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kim, H.; Jeong, W.; Jang, S.; Kim, Y.; Park, E. Association between Sexual Behavior and Depression in South Korean Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hyde, Z.; Flicker, L.; Hankey, G.J.; Almeida, O.P.; McCaul, K.A.; Chubb, S.P.; Yeap, B.B. Prevalence of sexual activity and associated factors in men aged 75 to 95 years: A cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2010, 153, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cyranowski, J.M.; Bromberger, J.; Youk, A.; Matthews, K.; Kravitz, H.M.; Powell, L.H. Lifetime Depression History and Sexual Function in Women at Midlife. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2004, 33, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lorenz, T.; van Anders, S. Interactions of sexual activity, gender, and depression with immunity. J. Sex. Med. 2014, 11, 966–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Li, W.; Yin, H.; Liu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Ma, H.; Geng, Q. Associations Among Depression, Hemoglobin A1c Level, and Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Study. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 815196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fang, M.; Wang, D.; Coresh, J.; Selvin, E. Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999–2018. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 2219–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Eisenberg, M.L.; Shindel, A.W.; Smith, J.F.; Lue, T.F.; Walsh, T.J. Who is the 40-Year-Old Virgin and Where Did He/She Come From? Data from the National Survey of Family Growth. J. Sex. Med. 2009, 6, 2154–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kirby, D.B. Emerging Answers 2007: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Power to Decide: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Weaver, H.; Smith, G.; Kippax, S. School-based sex education policies and indicators of sexual health among young people: A comparison of the Netherlands, France, Australia and the United States. Sex Educ. 2005, 5, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Madkour, A.S.; Farhat, T.; Halpern, C.T.; Godeau, E.; Nic Gabhainn, S. Early Adolescent Sexual Initiation and Physical/Psychological Symptoms: A Comparative Analysis of Five Nations. J. Youth Adolesc. 2010, 39, 1211–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2014; Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2015.
  31. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. Gender differences in depression. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2001, 10, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Buckman, J.E.J.; Saunders, R.; Stott, J.; Arundell, L.-L.; O’Driscoll, C.; Davies, M.R.; Eley, T.C.; Hollon, S.D.; Kendrick, T.; Ambler, G.; et al. Role of age, gender and marital status in prognosis for adults with depression: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci. 2021, 30, e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zuelke, A.E.; Luck, T.; Schroeter, M.L.; Witte, A.V.; Hinz, A.; Engel, C.; Enzenbach, C.; Zachariae, S.; Loeffler, M.; Thiery, J.; et al. The association between unemployment and depression–Results from the population-based LIFE-adult-study. J. Affect. Disord. 2018, 235, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ettman, C.K.; Cohen, G.H.; Galea, S. Is wealth associated with depressive symptoms in the United States? Ann. Epidemiol. 2020, 43, 25–31.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Twenge, J.M.; Park, H. The Decline in Adult Activities Among U.S. Adolescents, 1976–2016. Child Dev. 2019, 90, 638–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Twenge, J.M.; Sherman, R.A.; Wells, B.E. Declines in Sexual Frequency among American Adults, 1989–2014. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2017, 46, 2389–2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brody, S. The Relative Health Benefits of Different Sexual Activities. J. Sex. Med. 2010, 7, 1336–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Carmichael, M.S.; Humbert, R.; Dixen, J.; Palmisano, G.; Greenleaf, W.; Davidson, J.M. Plasma Oxytocin Increases in the Human Sexual Response. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987, 64, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Smith, D.G.; Frankel, S.; Yarnell, J. Sex and death: Are they related? findings from the Caerphilly Cohort Study. BMJ 1997, 315, 1641–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lindau, S.T.; Gavrilova, N. Sex, health, and years of sexually active life gained due to good health: Evidence from two US population based cross sectional surveys of ageing. BMJ 2010, 340, c810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, H.; Waite, L.J.; Shen, S.; Wang, D.H. Is Sex Good for Your Health? A National Study on Partnered Sexuality and Cardiovascular Risk among Older Men and Women. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2016, 57, 276–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tanton, C.; McDonagh, L.; Cabecinha, M.; Clifton, S.; Geary, R.; Rait, G.; Saunders, J.; Cassell, J.; Bonell, C.; Mitchell, K.R.; et al. How does the sexual, physical and mental health of young adults not in education, employment or training (NEET) compare to workers and students? BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ueda, P.; Mercer, C.; Ghaznavi, C.; Herbenick, D. Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000–2018. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e203833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rice, C.E.; Vasilenko, S.A.; Fish, J.N.; Lanza, S.T. Sexual minority health disparities: An examination of age-related trends across adulthood in a national cross-sectional sample. Ann. Epidemiol. 2019, 31, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Krueger, E.A.; Meyer, I.H.; Upchurch, D.M. Sexual Orientation Group Differences in Perceived Stress and Depressive Symptoms Among Young Adults in the United States. LGBT Health 2018, 5, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Trends in sexuality of depressed and non-depressed participants from the NHANES surveys over time. (A): Average age at first sexual intercourse (Y); (B): normal frequency of sexual activity (%); (C): heterosexual sexual orientation (%). Dotted line indicates “depressed” and solid line indicates “non-depressed” participants.
Figure 1. Trends in sexuality of depressed and non-depressed participants from the NHANES surveys over time. (A): Average age at first sexual intercourse (Y); (B): normal frequency of sexual activity (%); (C): heterosexual sexual orientation (%). Dotted line indicates “depressed” and solid line indicates “non-depressed” participants.
Ijerph 19 14010 g001
Figure 2. Subgroup analysis of differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed participants from NHANES 2005–2016. (A): Differences in average age at first sexual intercourse by marital status; (B): differences in average age at first sexual intercourse by employment status; (C): differences in average age at first sexual intercourse by family income status; (D): differences in normal frequency of sexual activity by education status; (E): differences in normal frequency of sexual activity by family income status; (F): differences in heterosexual sexual orientation by education status; hollow box indicates “depressed” and solid box indicates “non-depressed” participants; college means “some college or above”; high school means ”high school graduate or general educational development”; ** p ≤ 0.001, * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Subgroup analysis of differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed participants from NHANES 2005–2016. (A): Differences in average age at first sexual intercourse by marital status; (B): differences in average age at first sexual intercourse by employment status; (C): differences in average age at first sexual intercourse by family income status; (D): differences in normal frequency of sexual activity by education status; (E): differences in normal frequency of sexual activity by family income status; (F): differences in heterosexual sexual orientation by education status; hollow box indicates “depressed” and solid box indicates “non-depressed” participants; college means “some college or above”; high school means ”high school graduate or general educational development”; ** p ≤ 0.001, * p < 0.05.
Ijerph 19 14010 g002
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of depressed and non-depressed participants.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of depressed and non-depressed participants.
Depressed (n = 5432)Non-Depressed (n = 16,005)
Age (Y)39.05 (38.60–39.50)38.44 (38.07–38.81)
Female (%)59.9447.94
Age Group (%)
18–38 (Y)46.63 (44.72–48.53)49.73 (48.25–51.21)
39–59 (Y)53.37 (51.47–55.28)50.27 (48.79–51.75)
Race/Ethnicity (%)
Non-Hispanic White63.01 (59.61–66.41)65.18 (62.15–68.21)
Non-Hispanic Black13.36 (11.34–15.38)11.58 (10.00–13.16)
Hispanic16.43 (14.20–18.67)15.75 (13.59–17.91)
Others7.19 (6.17–8.22)7.49 (6.65–8.33)
Marital Status (%)
Living together51.97 (49.99–53.95)63.78 (62.29–65.27)
Living alone44.14 (42.15–46.14)32.52 (31.13–33.91)
Employment Status (%)
Employed60.74 (58.57–62.92)79.21 (78.11–80.32)
Unemployed39.25 (37.07–41.42)20.74 (19.63–21.84)
Education Status (%)
Some college or above52.00 (49.48–54.53)62.51 (60.57–64.45)
High school graduate or GED23.84 (21.97–25.71)19.92 (18.85–21.00)
Below high school 19.68 (18.03–21.33)13.07 (11.80–14.34)
Family Income Status (%)
PIR < 1.3031.61 (29.39–33.83)18.31 (16.80–19.82)
PIR: 1.30–3.5034.58 (32.52–36.64)31.33 (29.94–32.72)
PIR ≥ 3.5027.98 (25.81–30.16)44.96 (42.74–47.18)
GED: general educational development; PIR, Poverty Impact Ratio. Values are means for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables; values in brackets represent the confidence interval of the corresponding variables.
Table 2. Differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed participants.
Table 2. Differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed participants.
DepressedNon-DepressedDepressed vs. Non-Depressedp
Average Age at First Sexual Intercourse (Y)16.50 (16.34–16.66)17.46 (17.34–17.59)−0.96 (−1.14 to −0.79)<0.001
Normal Frequency of Sexual Activity (%)24.21 (22.75–25.67)29.44 (28.31–30.58)−5.3 (−7.06 to −3.41)<0.001
Heterosexual Sexual Orientation (%)66.10 (64.22–67.98)75.51 (74.51–76.52)−9.42 (−11.52 to −7.31)<0.001
Values are means for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables; values in brackets represent the confidence interval of the corresponding variables. Depressed vs. non-depressed: difference in depressed minus non-depressed; values in brackets represent the confidence interval of difference between the depressed and non-depressed participants.
Table 3. Temporal trends and differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed individuals by subgroup.
Table 3. Temporal trends and differences in sexuality between depressed and non-depressed individuals by subgroup.
Average Age at First Sexual
Intercourse (Y)
Normal Frequency of Sexual Activity (%)Heterosexual Sexual
Orientation (%)
pfor trend0.9260.8230.552
By Ageppfor interactionppfor interactionppfor interaction
18–38<0.0010.8180.1360.136<0.0010.647
39–59<0.0010.002 0.003
By Race/Ethnicityppfor interactionppfor interactionppfor interaction
Non-Hispanic White<0.0010.3160.004 0.323<0.0010.404
Non-Hispanic Black0.003 0.229 <0.001
Hispanic0.001 0.001 0.002
Others<0.0010.244 <0.001
By Marital Statusppfor interactionppfor interactionppfor interaction
Living Together<0.001<0.0010.023 0.725<0.0010.846
Living Alone<0.0010.772 <0.001
By Employment Statusppfor interactionppfor interactionppfor interaction
Employed<0.001<0.0010.163 0.389 <0.0010.460
Unemployed<0.0010.003 <0.001
By Education Statusppfor interactionppfor interactionppfor interaction
Some College or Above<0.0010.446 0.0330.062<0.0010.023
High School <0.0010.009<0.001
Below High School0.0030.053 0.001
By Family Income Statusppfor interactionppfor interactionppfor interaction
PIR ≤ 1.3<0.0010.013 0.0190.017<0.0010.271
1.3 < PIR < 3.5<0.0010.009<0.001
PIR ≥ 3.5<0.0010.0360.004
GED: general educational development; PIR, Poverty Impact Ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Xu, M.; Liao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Ma, H.; Geng, Q. Temporal Trends and Differences in Sexuality among Depressed and Non-Depressed Adults in the United States. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114010

AMA Style

Li W, Wang Y, Xu M, Liao Y, Zhou H, Ma H, Geng Q. Temporal Trends and Differences in Sexuality among Depressed and Non-Depressed Adults in the United States. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(21):14010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Weiya, Yu Wang, Mingyu Xu, Yingxue Liao, Haofeng Zhou, Huan Ma, and Qingshan Geng. 2022. "Temporal Trends and Differences in Sexuality among Depressed and Non-Depressed Adults in the United States" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 21: 14010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop