Next Article in Journal
Arsenic Oxidation and Removal from Water via Core–Shell MnO2@La(OH)3 Nanocomposite Adsorption
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Public Health Economic Loss from PM2.5 Pollution in ‘2 + 26’ Cities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 17
10.3390/ijerph191710645
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Culture Method for the Detection of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Water Samples from Heater–Cooler Units and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Machines

by
Savina Ditommaso
1,*,
Monica Giacomuzzi
1,
Gabriele Memoli
1,
Jacopo Garlasco
1,
Antonio Curtoni
2,
Marco Iannaccone
2 and
Carla M. Zotti
1
1
Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
2
Microbiology and Virology Unit, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(17), 10645; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710645
Submission received: 26 July 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 22 August 2022 / Published: 26 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from cultures is particularly laborious due to the potential overgrowth of coexisting non-acid fast bacilli. To reduce the overgrowth of these non-mycobacterial organisms, a decontamination step with NaOH or cetylpyridinium chloride is highly recommended before plating the samples on the culture medium. However, due to their toxicity, decontamination solutions tend to decrease NTM recovery from clinical and environmental samples. Here, we tested an alternative method for NTM recovery based on the use of NTM Elite agar, a selective medium that does not require a decontamination step. Using NTM Elite agar, we were able to detect non-tuberculous mycobacteria in 27.7% (30/108) of water samples analyzed. The average time to NTM detection was 18 days, but some strains required longer to grow, perhaps due to the stressful environmental conditions (periodical disinfection of devices). NTM Elite agar’s effectiveness in inhibiting background flora was proven by the isolation of NTM from samples with and without background flora, showing no statistically significant differences in detection rates for different total viable counts of background flora (p = 0.4989). In conclusion, our findings indicate that effective NTM recovery from HCU- and ECMO-derived water samples can be achieved via filtration and direct culture of the filters on NTM Elite agar. This simple procedure can speed up laboratory work and provide an improved method, successfully resulting in low contamination and high detection rate, in addition to being less time-consuming. Its sensitivity and lack of a decontamination step make this protocol particularly useful for monitoring the effectiveness of device disinfection in hospital settings, even in the presence of low NTM loads. Reading timeframes should probably be extended to 7 weeks (i.e., well beyond the standard 4 weeks advised by the manufacturer), in order to isolate even the slow-growing mycobacteria. However, an extended incubation period is not necessary for exclusion of M. chimaera contamination of the devices, as M. chimaera isolation times do not generally exceed 3 weeks.

1. Introduction

Evidence to date indicates that heater–cooler units (HCUs) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) machines used during cardiac surgery can generate infectious aerosols due to the presence of water-borne pathogens such as Mycobacterium chimaera [1,2,3,4]. This unwanted effect makes environmental microbiological surveillance of HCU and ECMO water systems an essential step to reduce the risk of healthcare-acquired infections associated with use of HCU and ECMO devices. Ideally, this microbial monitoring should be performed through analytical protocols able to detect even low densities of bacteria.
As reported by several researchers, the isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from cultures is particularly laborious due to the potential overgrowth of coexisting non-acid fast bacilli (non-AFB) [5,6,7]. Thus, in order to reduce the overgrowth of these non-mycobacterial organisms, a decontamination step with NaOH or cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) is highly recommended before plating the samples on the culture medium. However, due to their toxicity, decontamination solutions tend to decrease NTM recovery from clinical and environmental samples on both liquid and solid media. Other factors affecting the recovery of mycobacteria include the type of culture medium and the temperature at which the incubation is performed [8].
For microbiological surveillance of HCU and ECMO water systems, the technical document issued by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) recommends concentrating water samples by filtration or centrifugation, decontaminating them with NALC-NaOH or CPC and plating on selective media, such as Middlebrook 7H11 or 7H10 agar, or egg-based media, such as Löwenstein–Jensen agar. In addition, culture in liquid medium can be performed using the mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) 960 system [9]. However, automated cultivation using these special media can become prohibitively expensive when a lab is dealing with a large volume of samples. Another drawback of using these types of media is that, in some cases, they have been shown to limit the growth of environmental bacteria, mainly psychrophilic or thermophilic species [8,10,11].
Even though a number of different publications providing useful guidance do exist [7,9,12,13,14,15,16], a standard method for NTM detection has not yet been established. In this regard, variable growth rates, specific growth requirements and different sources of water samples (e.g., treated water systems, natural/surface water, or different devices, e.g., samples from endoscopes or HCUs) are variables that can influence the choice of the most suitable analytical protocol. Furthermore, as mentioned above, pre-treatment steps are often required to limit bacterial and fungal overgrowth, which would otherwise make it difficult to detect precisely the presence of slow-growing mycobacteria species. However, due to their inherent toxicity, pre-treatment procedures may also prevent the detection of certain mycobacteria or reduce the positivity rate and the number of colonies in water samples [5,17,18].
Recent evidence has shown that protocols based on rapidly growing mycobacterium (RGM) media can be highly effective in recovering NTM from potable and non-potable water samples [19]. More specifically, RGM medium alone, without pre-treatment, has been shown to afford higher sensitivity (~91%) and lower overgrowth of contaminating water-borne microorganisms compared to standard media.
Our microbiological laboratory operates as a regional reference service for microbiological surveillance of all HCUs and ECMOs located in cardiac surgery facilities across the Piedmont region (north-west Italy). Specifically, our lab plays a central role in diagnosing, detecting, identifying, and typing environmental infectious bacterial agents (environmental risks), monitoring the response to epidemics, providing scientific evidence for disease prevention and control, and assisting in the development of regional guidelines on control and risk containment of NTM infection [20,21,22]. Fittingly, we have previously shown that the commercial RGM medium, NTM Elite agar (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), constitutes an effective alternative method for NTM recovery, as it efficiently inhibits non-AFB without requiring a decontamination step [23]. In this previous study, we used artificially contaminated samples with M. chimaera and Mycobacterium chelonae to compare recovery efficiency of the membrane filter washing procedure [9] against direct plating of membrane filters on culture media.
Moreover, we compared the efficacy of NTM Elite agar in inhibiting the growth of aquatic bacteria with that of cetylpyridinium chloride and N-acetyl-L-cysteine sodium hydroxide decontamination treatments. We demonstrated that: (i) the washing procedure yielded a low release of both mycobacterium strains from the membrane filters (≈7%), while direct plating of membrane filters led to a 100% cell recovery; (ii) water sample pretreatment with N-acetyl-L-cysteine sodium hydroxide, despite achieving complete suppression of non-acid fast bacilli, caused a reduction in mycobacteria growth, while decontamination with cetylpyridinium chloride was found to be ineffective against some non-acid fast organisms.
Here, we sought to evaluate NTM Elite agar’s performance in recovering NTM from water samples collected from HCU and ECMO devices. Furthermore, we analyzed NTM Elite agar’s selectivity in consideration of interfering bacteria, i.e., total viable counts (TVCs) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in collected samples, by evaluating the relationship between TVC concentration and probability of NTM isolation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microbiological Surveillance in Cardiac Surgery Settings

In this study, we analyzed water samples collected between January 2021 and November 2021 during a microbiological surveillance carried out on 33 devices—26 HCUs manufactured by LivaNova or Maquet Getinge and 7 ECMOs by Maquet Getinge—from nine cardiac surgery facilities and from one sink used by healthcare facility staff to fill water tanks of the hospital’s devices.

2.2. Sample Collection

A total of 108 water samples were collected in sterile 1 L plastic bottles, containing 20 mg of sodium thiosulphate. Samples were immediately sent to the laboratory or, if not possible, stored at a controlled temperature (5 ± 3 °C for 12–15 h). All analyses were performed within 24 h of collection.

2.3. Microbiology Workflow

Water samples were tested for NTM, P. aeruginosa, and total viable counts (TVCs). TVCs and P. aeruginosa are general indicators of water cleanliness and are used as surrogate indicators of decontamination effectiveness. Enumeration of background bacteria in HCU-derived water samples was performed according to the UNI EN ISO 6222 protocol [24]. Briefly, 1 mL of undiluted samples and 1 mL of samples diluted 1:10 in Page’s saline solution were analyzed using the pour-plate method on yeast extract agar. Results were reported as CFU/mL. Samples diluted 1:10 with counts greater than 300 CFU/mL per plate were reported as >3 × 103/mL. When we could not determine the presence of NTM due to fungal growth covering the filter or presence of non-AFB at a concentration >3 × 102 CFU/mL, samples were defined as “unreadable plates”.
P. aeruginosa was detected and quantified by culture according to the ISO 16266 method [25], which consists in filtering 250 mL of the water sample using 0.45 μm mixed cellulose esters filters (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Results were recorded as CFU/250 mL.
NTM isolation was performed using the following procedure: 100 mL of each water sample was filtered through mixed cellulose esters filter, and the filter was directly added to a Petri dish containing NTM Elite agar (0.47% Middlebrook 7H9 base, 0.5% glycerol, 1.3% agar, 0.4% yeast extract, 0.2% glucose, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 0.0056% oleic acid, and 0.0494% of a mix of selective antibiotics and antifungals) (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Subsequently, the NTM Elite agar plates were incubated at 30 °C in a sealed plastic bag to prevent dehydration. Starting from the seventh day, cultures were examined weekly for seven weeks. After realizing that mycobacteria from environmental samples needed a longer time to grow, we opted to extend the incubation time from 4 weeks—as advised by the manufacturer—to 8 weeks.
All colonies growing on NTM Elite agar were confirmed as AFB by Kinyoun stain and then subcultured on Middlebrook 7H11 medium and identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF). NTM were processed according to the MycoEx preparation protocol following the manufacturer’s instructions. Spectra were acquired by Bruker Microflex LT (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) MALDI-TOF MS and analyzed by MBT Mycobacteria RUO Library v.4.0 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).
The results from NTM Elite agar analyses were reported as CFU/100 mL.

2.4. Quality Control

As satisfactory performance control for this new protocol, we analyzed 6 samples of proficiency test (PT) for NTM recovery in water samples (Mycobacterium spp. Water Scheme) distributed by the Food and Environmental Proficiency Testing Unit (FEPTU) of UK Health Security Agency (UK HSA). This microbiology scheme provides samples to laboratories that examine HCU waters for Mycobacterium spp. The FEPTU report provides the expected results (i.e., the Mycobacterium spp. colony counts in each distributed samples) to participating laboratories [26].

2.5. Data Analysis

Data were collected and organized using Microsoft Access and Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Hypothesis tests on categorical variables were performed using Fisher’s exact test. Correlation between bacterial contamination (total viable counts), and proportion of detected NTM-positive samples was inspected through LOESS regression. All analytical computation and plotting were carried out using the statistical software R version 4.0.5 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [27].

3. Results

A total of 102 water samples from 26 HCUs—12 Stockert 3T (LivaNova, Sorin Group, Munich, Germany), 14 HCU40 (Maquet, Getinge Group, Rastatt, Germany)—and from 7 ECMOs (HU35, Maquet, Getinge), were collected and cultured on NTM Elite agar. These 33 devices are regularly disinfected according to the manufacturer’s instructions: 58 of the 102 samples (57%) were collected after disinfection, while 44 (43%) before disinfection. Moreover, 6 water samples were taken from one sink faucet equipped with a point-of-use (POU) filter (this sink was associated with tank-filling of 4 devices—2 HCUs and 2 ECMOs—that turned out to be NTM-positive), bringing the total number of samples to 108.
As shown in Table 1, we successfully isolated NTM from 27.7% (30/108) of all specimens combined.
Overall, NTM, TVCs, and P. aeruginosa results were available from 100 out of 108 samples. The results of this microbiological surveillance are summarized in Table 2.
In order to analyze NTM ELITE agar’s selectivity, we disaggregated the data by TVCs, P. aeruginosa, and NTM results. As shown in Table 2, NTM were isolated in 28 samples: 16/58 (27.6%) of samples with background flora vs. 12/42 (28.6%) of those without background flora. Of note, we were able to detect an NTM-positive sample even among specimens with a high bioburden (>3 × 103 CFU/mL). The difference between these proportions was not significant, as Fisher’s exact test analysis indicated that we would not have reached a higher NTM recovery rate in samples without non-AFB (p = 0.4989) or P. aeruginosa (p = 1), indicating that, under our experimental conditions, non-AFB species do not inhibit or mask the growth of NTM colonies on NTM Elite agar.
Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression failed to show any particular correlation between the proportion of NTM-positive samples and the presence of different TVCs of contaminating bacteria (Figure 1). Notably, NTM-containing sample proportions exceeded 30% even in samples with TVCs > 1000.
When considering the comparison between TVCs—1 mL of sample analyzed—and the presence of non-AFB on NTM Elite agar—100 mL of sample analyzed—we noticed that 1% of samples yielded non-AFB on NTM Elite agar (unreadable plates) in the absence of overgrowth (Table 3).
Among samples collected from Stockert 3T HCUs, nine samples did not provide reliable results on NTM Elite agar due to the presence of a large number of non-AFB, eight of them having been collected prior to disinfection and one after HCU disinfection. The results are listed in Table 4.
NTM prevalence among the devices was 69.2% (18/26) for HCUs—mycobacteria were isolated on more than one sample from some devices—and 28.6% (2/7) for ECMO machines.
A total of 43 isolates belonged to 7 mycobacterial species (M. chimaera, Mycobacterium gordonae, Mycobacterium paragordonae, M. chelonae, Mycobacterium lentiflavum, Mycobacterium mucogenicum, Mycobacterium frederiksbergense). M. chimaera was isolated only from Stockert 3T HCUs. Specifically, we detected M. chimaera in 58.3% (7/12) of Stockert 3T HCUs, including two devices labeled with an M. chimaera-free certificate (claimed by the manufacturer), while all Maquet devices—both HCU 40 and ECMO—were negative. Two LivaNova devices were colonized by two different mycobacterium species in the same samples (M. chimaera, M. paragordonae); one Maquet device was colonized by three different mycobacterium species (M. lentiflavum, M. mucogenicum, M. frederiksbergense).
The time to detection for each NTM species was 12–15 days for M. chelonae, 13–18 days for M. chimaera, 10–43 days for M. gordonae, 17 days for M. lentiflavum, 13–18 days for M. paragordonae, 10 days for M. mucogenicum and 7 days for M. frederiksbergense.
All six PT samples obtained from UK HAS FEPTU were correctly classified as NTM-positive. Representative images of our culture results are shown in Figure 2. Table 5 details the expected results declared by the FEPTU report.

4. Discussion

The detection of NTM species in HCU waterlines can be conducted through either molecular approaches [20,21] or culture-based methods, the latter mainly relying on three types of medium: Löwenstein–Jensen, Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960, and Middlebrook 7H11 [7,13]. Even though culture-based protocols are widely used in clinical microbiology, they generally require long incubation times—six to eight weeks—due to the slow growth rate of mycobacteria. In addition, they are ineffective in detecting viable but non-culturable bacteria under stressful conditions. Moreover, because of their low-analytic sensitivity and high sample contamination rates, these protocols tend to generate low-quality quantitative culture results [28], often biased by the bactericidal activity of the decontamination agents being used [17,18]. Thus, more sensitive detection protocols are urgently needed to perform environmental microbiological surveillance of medical devices.
In the present study, we assessed NTM Elite agar in recovering NTM from HCU- and ECMO-derived water samples. To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing environmental NTM using a protocol based on direct plating of membrane filters on culture medium after filtration. Following this protocol, we were able to detect NTM in 27.7% of water samples analyzed. Specifically, our results show that M. chimaera was only isolated from Stockert 3T HCUs, even from devices for which an M. chimera-free certificate had been issued by the manufacturer after microbiological analysis of a sample obtained after a deep-disinfection of the device. This is in line with previous findings indicating that M. chimaera contamination occurs predominantly in water samples obtained from Stockert 3T LivaNova devices [21]. Therefore, extra infection control precautions should be taken when using these devices, e.g., placing HCUs outside of the operating rooms or venting the exhaust directly to room exhaust [29,30].
The average time to NTM detection was 18 days, but some strains required longer to grow, perhaps due to the stressful environmental conditions (periodical disinfection of devices): for instance, three out of eight M. gordonae strains required well beyond the standard 4 weeks to be observed and isolated on the filter.
Overall, NTM were isolated from 27.6% of non-AFB-free samples vs. 28.6% of non-AFB-containing samples (Table 2 and Table 3). This is consistent with the fact that NTM Elite agar contains a combination of selective agents highly effective in inhibiting the vast majority of non-glucose-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas species [31], thereby allowing a more efficient NTM recovery. Consistently, our LOESS curve analysis showed no relationship between TVCs concentration and probability of isolation of NTM.
NTM Elite agar’s effectiveness in inhibiting non-AFB contamination is in keeping with a report by Alexander et al. [19], showing that RGM medium generates much fewer samples with non-AFB growth (0.4%) than any other medium tested. In our study, however, we observed overgrowth in 9% of samples, which is somewhat higher than that reported by Alexander and co-workers. This difference could be due to the different processing methods of the samples: direct plating of concentrated samples vs. direct plating of the membrane filter on the NTM Elite agar. In the latter case, the cellulose ester membrane could have interfered on the action of the most important selective agent [32]. However, in NTM Elite agar, 9-chloro-9-[4-(diethylamino) phenyl]-9,10-dihydro-10-phenylacridine hydrochloride [31] prevents the growth of a wide range of bacteria and fungi. Indeed in our previous study [23], we demonstrated that direct plating of filters on agar plate ensures optimal recovery of NTM and a strong inhibition of all tested aquatic bacteria except for Burkholderia multivorans. Therefore, the discrepancy with the results of Alexander et al. may be ascribable to the different amounts of sample analyzed in the two studies. While we cultured 100 mL of filtered samples by direct plating of membrane filter, in the study by Alexander et al., only one hundredth of the sample was plated (100 mL of sample were concentrated ten times by filtration, resuspended in 10 mL of sterile distilled water, vortexed, and then 100 μL of the eluate were plated directly onto RGM medium).
A significant shortcoming of our study might be the lack of a direct comparison of the described culture method for NTM to a standard culture method such as concentration by centrifugation [14] or filtration [9] and decontamination followed by culture on 7H11 agar. Indeed, unpublished data, preliminarily obtained on 40 samples analyzed both with direct plating of filters on NTM Elite agar and with the established method [20], have shown a mild concordance between the two methods (Agreement = 75.0%, κ = 0.245), the frequency of NTM isolation being 25.5% with NTM Elite agar (11/40) and 12.5% with the standard protocol (5/40). Furthermore, the previous study [23], conducted on artificial samples, showed that this standard method is actually not very sensitive, due to poor bacteria recovery from the filter and toxicity of reagents used for decontamination.
The results obtained from participation in the PT “Mycobacterium spp. Scheme” confirmed the validity of our protocol: we isolated M. chelonae from three PT distributions (Figure 2), while 75% of participating laboratories, using MGIT medium, failed to detect M. chelonae at levels of approximately 2.2 × 102 and 5.0 × 102 CFUs (distribution number MY006B and MY008A), and all laboratories failed to detect M. chelonae at levels 5.8 × 101 CFUs (distribution number MY009A). The root cause for this may lie in the incubation temperature of MGIT: M. chelonae grows better at lower temperatures (~30 °C) compared to other mycobacterial species [33,34]. Therefore, samples with low M. chelonae loads (e.g., MY009A) can yield a false negative if incubated at temperatures above 30° C. Moreover, according to Kim et al. [35], isolation of M. gordonae and M. paragordonae strains can be extremely challenging when medium seeding is performed at a temperature above 30 °C. Indeed, M. gordonae and M. paragordonae, two phylogenetically close species, grow optimally at a temperature of 30 °C—M. paragordonae can grow in macrophages at 30 °C, but not at 37 °C [36]. Thus, according to these results, using MGIT medium only for NTM recovery from environmental water samples does not ensure more accurate results simply because specific strains can be missed.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings indicate that effective NTM recovery from HCU- and ECMO-derived water samples can be achieved via filtration and direct culture of the filters on NTM Elite agar at 30° C. This simple procedure can speed up laboratory work and provide an improved method, successfully resulting in low contamination and high detection rate, in addition to being less time-consuming. Its sensitivity (all mycobacteria present in the sample remain trapped on the filter surface) and lack of a decontamination step make this protocol particularly useful for monitoring the effectiveness of device disinfection in hospital settings, even in the presence of low NTM loads. As some samples collected from devices prior to disinfection showed overgrowth, we advise that a lower amount of sample should be filtered and plated, in case higher levels of contamination from other water-borne microorganisms are expected. Moreover, according to our results, we recommend that the reading timeframes should be extended to 7 weeks (i.e., well beyond the standard 4 weeks), in order to isolate even slow-growing mycobacteria. However, an extended incubation period is not necessary for exclusion of M. chimaera contamination of the devices, as M. chimaera isolation times do not generally exceed 3 weeks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.D. and M.G.; methodology, S.D. and M.G.; data curation, M.G. and J.G.; funding acquisition, S.D.; formal analysis, S.D., M.G., G.M., A.C. and M.I.; supervision, S.D. and C.M.Z.; writing—original draft, S.D., M.G. and J.G.; writing—review and editing, S.D., M.G., J.G. and C.M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant of University of Turin (DITS_RILO_21_01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable since humans were not involved in this research study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable since humans were not involved in this research study.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset presented in the current study is not publicly available since data contains information that is being further used for other publication; however, it can be available to the editor upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gilbert, J.A. Nosocomial Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Infections Associated with Heater-Cooler Devices. Lancet Respir. Med. 2017, 5, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stammers, A.H.; Riley, J.B. The Heater Cooler as a Source of Infection from Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. J. Extra Corpor. Technol. 2016, 48, 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  3. Trudzinski, F.C.; Schlotthauer, U.; Kamp, A.; Hennemann, K.; Muellenbach, R.M.; Reischl, U.; Gärtner, B.; Wilkens, H.; Bals, R.; Herrmann, M.; et al. Clinical Implications of Mycobacterium chimaera Detection in Thermoregulatory Devices Used for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), Germany, 2015 to 2016. Euro Surveill 2016, 21, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. van Ingen, J.; Blaak, H.; de Beer, J.; de Roda Husman, A.M.; van Soolingen, D. Rapidly Growing Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Cultured from Home Tap and Shower Water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 6017–6019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fernandes, H.M.Z.; Conceição, E.C.; Gomes, K.M.; da Silva, M.G.; Dias, R.C.S.; Duarte, R.S. Recovery of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria from Water Is Influenced by Phenotypic Characteristics and Decontamination Methods. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Williams, M.D.; Falkinham, J.O. Effect of Cetylpyridinium Chloride (CPC) on Colony Formation of Common Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. Pathogens 2018, 7, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Thomson, R.; Carter, R.; Gilpin, C.; Coulter, C.; Hargreaves, M. Comparison of Methods for Processing Drinking Water Samples for the Isolation of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 3094–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rotcheewaphan, S.; Odusanya, O.E.; Henderson, C.M.; Stephenson, D.; Olivier, K.N.; Perry, J.D.; Zelazny, A.M. Performance of RGM Medium for Isolation of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria from Respiratory Specimens from Non-Cystic Fibrosis Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e01519-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. EU Protocol for Testing of Mycobacterium Chimaera Infections Potentially Associated with Heater-Cooler Units; ECDC technical document; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Stockholm, Sweden, 2015.
  10. Peña, J.A.; Ferraro, M.J.; Hoffman, C.G.; Branda, J.A. Growth Detection Failures by the Nonradiometric Bactec MGIT 960 Mycobacterial Culture System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 2092–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Piersimoni, C.; Nista, D.; Bornigia, S.; Gherardi, G. Unreliable Detection of Mycobacterium xenopi by the Nonradiometric Bactec MGIT 960 Culture System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 804–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. National Health Service Management and Decontamination of Flexible Endoscopes (HTM 01-06). Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/management-and-decontamination-of-flexible-endoscopes (accessed on 26 September 2018).
  13. Parashar, D.; Chauhan, D.S.; Sharma, V.D.; Chauhan, A.; Chauhan, S.V.S.; Katoch, V.M. Optimization of Procedures for Isolation of Mycobacteria from Soil and Water Samples Obtained in Northern India. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 3751–3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. PHE. Protocol for Environmental Sampling, Processing and Culturing of Water and Air Samples for the Isolation of Slow-Growing Mycobacteria Standard Operating Procedure; PHE: London, UK, 2016.
  15. Radomski, N.; Cambau, E.; Moulin, L.; Haenn, S.; Moilleron, R.; Lucas, F.S. Comparison of Culture Methods for Isolation of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria from Surface Waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3514–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ulmann, V.; Modrá, H.; Babak, V.; Weston, R.T.; Pavlik, I. Recovery of Mycobacteria from Heavily Contaminated Environmental Matrices. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Asmar, S.; Drancourt, M. Chlorhexidine Decontamination of Sputum for Culturing Mycobacterium tuberculosis. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sattar, A.; Zakaria, Z.; Abu, J.; Aziz, S.A.; Gabriel, R.-P. Evaluation of Six Decontamination Procedures for Isolation of Mycobacterium avium complex from Avian Feces. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Alexander, K.J.; Furlong, J.L.; Baron, J.L.; Rihs, J.D.; Stephenson, D.; Perry, J.D.; Stout, J.E. Evaluation of a New Culture Medium for Isolation of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria from Environmental Water Samples. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ditommaso, S.; Giacomuzzi, M.; Memoli, G.; Cavallo, R.; Curtoni, A.; Avolio, M.; Silvestre, C.; Zotti, C.M. Reduction of Turnaround Time for Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria Detection in Heater-Cooler Units by Propidium Monoazide-Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 104, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ditommaso, S.; Giacomuzzi, M.; Memoli, G.; Zotti, C.M. Real-Time PCR, the Best Approaches for Rapid Testing for Mycobacterium chimaera Detection in Heater Cooler Units and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Perfusion 2021, 36, 626–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ditommaso, S.; Giacomuzzi, M.; Memoli, G.; Zotti, C.M. Failure to Eradicate Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria upon Disinfection of Heater-Cooler Units: Results of a Microbiological Investigation in Northwestern Italy. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 106, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ditommaso, S.; Giacomuzzi, M.; Memoli, G.; Garlasco, J.; Curtoni, A.; Iannaccone, M.; Zotti, C.M. Chemical Susceptibility Testing of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterium Strains and Other Aquatic Bacteria: Results of a Study for the Development of a More Sensitive and Simple Method for the Detection of NTM in Environmental Samples. J. Microbiol. Methods 2022, 193, 106405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. ISO 6222; Water Quality—Enumeration of Culturable Micro-Organisms—Colony Count by Inoculation in a Nutrient Agar Culture Medium. International Standards Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
  25. ISO 16266:2006; Water Quality—Detection and Enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa—Method by Membrane Filtration. International Standards Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  26. Proficiency Testing for Food, Water and Environmental Microbiology: Mycobacterium spp. in Water Scheme. 2016. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mycobacterium-spp-in-water-scheme-sample-schedule (accessed on 20 August 2022).
  27. R Development Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Development Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Svensson, E.; Jensen, E.T.; Rasmussen, E.M.; Folkvardsen, D.B.; Norman, A.; Lillebaek, T. Mycobacterium chimaera in Heater-Cooler Units in Denmark Related to Isolates from the United States and United Kingdom. Emerging Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 507–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Schreiber, P.W.; Sax, H. Mycobacterium chimaera Infections Associated with Heater-Cooler Units in Cardiac Surgery. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 30, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Marra, A.R.; Diekema, D.J.; Edmond, M.B. Successful Termination of an Outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera Infections Associated with Contaminated Heater-Cooler Devices. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2021, 42, 471–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Preece, C.L.; Wichelhaus, T.A.; Perry, A.; Jones, A.L.; Cummings, S.P.; Perry, J.D.; Hogardt, M. Evaluation of Various Culture Media for Detection of Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 1797–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Havelaar, A.H.; During, M.; Delfgou-Van Asch, E.H. Comparative Study of Membrane Filtration and Enrichment Media for the Isolation and Enumeration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Sewage, Surface Water, and Swimming Pools. Can. J. Microbiol. 1985, 31, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Torvinen, E.; Suomalainen, S.; Paulin, L.; Kusnetsov, J. Mycobacteria in Finnish Cooling Tower Waters. Apmis 2014, 122, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, B.-J.; Kim, G.-N.; Kim, B.-R.; Jeon, C.O.; Jeong, J.; Lee, S.H.; Lim, J.-H.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, C.K.; Kook, Y.-H.; et al. Description of Mycobacterium chelonae subsp. bovis subsp. nov., Isolated from Cattle (Bos Taurus Coreanae), Emended Description of Mycobacterium chelonae and Creation of Mycobacterium chelonae subsp. chelonae subsp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 3882–3887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, B.-J.; Hong, S.-H.; Kook, Y.-H.; Kim, B.-J. Mycobacterium paragordonae sp. nov., a Slowly Growing, Scotochromogenic Species Closely Related to Mycobacterium gordonae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, B.-J.; Kim, B.-R.; Kook, Y.-H.; Kim, B.-J. A Temperature Sensitive Mycobacterium paragordonae Induces Enhanced Protective Immune Responses against Mycobacterial Infections in the Mouse Model. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 19 10645 g001 550
Figure 1. Proportions of samples with detected NTM according to counts of contaminating bacteria. The x-axis is represented by total viable counts (TVCs) (i.e., contaminating bacteria) and expressed on a logarithmic scale. The red line represents the trend identified by LOESS regression, while the shaded area depicts its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).
Figure 1. Proportions of samples with detected NTM according to counts of contaminating bacteria. The x-axis is represented by total viable counts (TVCs) (i.e., contaminating bacteria) and expressed on a logarithmic scale. The red line represents the trend identified by LOESS regression, while the shaded area depicts its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).
Ijerph 19 10645 g001
Ijerph 19 10645 g002 550
Figure 2. Results of six proficiency samples plated on NTM Elite agar.
Figure 2. Results of six proficiency samples plated on NTM Elite agar.
Ijerph 19 10645 g002
Table
Table 1. NTM isolation by sampling source.
Table 1. NTM isolation by sampling source.
Sampling SourceNTM Positive (%)NTM Negative (%)Total
Stockert 3T HCU14 (31.1)31 (68.9)45
Maquet HCU4012 (27.3)32 (72.7)44
Maquet ECMO2 (15.4)11(84.6)13
Sink2 * (33.3)4 (66.7)6
Total3078108
* Analyses allowed highlighting damage of the POU filters, which was responsible for contamination of 4 devices in the hospital.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of results relative to the three microbiological parameters examined (NTM, TVCs, and P. aeruginosa).
Table 2. Comparison of results relative to the three microbiological parameters examined (NTM, TVCs, and P. aeruginosa).
TVCs P. aeruginosa
<1 CFU/Ml a
(%)		1 ≤ CFU/mL ≤ 100 b
(%)		101 ≤ CFU/mL ≤ 1000 b
(%)		1001 b ≤ CFU/mL ≤3000 b
(%)		>3000 a CFU/mL
(%)		Positive
(%)		Negative
(%)
NTM positive samples16 (27.6)8 (44.4)1 (16.7)2 (40.0)1 (7.7)1 (11.1)27 (29.7)
NTM negative samples41 (70.7)10 (55.6)5 (83.3)3 (60.0)4 (30.8)3 (33.3)60 (65.9)
Unreadable plates1 (1.7)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)8 (61.5)5 (55.6)4 (4.4)
Total58186513991
TVC: total viable count. a Both TVCs (22 °C and 36 °C). b At least one of the two TVCs (22 °C and 36 °C) or both within the limit assigned. (Fisher test for NTM-positive vs. NTM-negative by TVCs: p = 0.4989). (Fisher test for NTM-positive vs. NTM-negative by presence of P. aeruginosa: p = 1).
Table
Table 3. Distribution of microbial flora results observed on NTM Elite agar (non-AFB) and TVCs counted on yeast extract agar.
Table 3. Distribution of microbial flora results observed on NTM Elite agar (non-AFB) and TVCs counted on yeast extract agar.
TVCs Total
<1 CFU/mL a
(%)		1 ≤ CFU/mL ≤ 100 b
(%)		101 ≤ CFU/mL ≤ 1000 b
(%)		1001 b ≤ CFU/mL ≤3000 b
(%)		>3000 a CFU/mL
(%)
Elite NTM negative
< 1 CFU/100 mL		41 (70.7)8 (44.4)4 (66.7)2 (40.0)2 (15.4)57
Elite NTM negative
1–100 CFU/100 mL		0 (0.0)2 (11.1)1 (16.7)1 (20.0)2 (15.4)6
Elite NTM positive
< 1 CFU/100 mL		16 (27.6)7 (38.9)1 (16.7)1 (20.0)1 (7.7)26
Elite NTM positive
1–50 CFU/100 mL		0 (0.0)1 (5.6)0 (0.0)1 (20.0)0 (0.0)2
Unreadable plates1 (1.7)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)8 (61.5)9
Total58186513100
TVC: total viable count. a Both TVCs (22 °C and 36 °C). b At least one of the two TVCs (22 °C and 36 °C) or both within the limit assigned.
Table
Table 4. Comparison of NTM Elite agar unreadable plates and TVCs/P. aeruginosa.
Table 4. Comparison of NTM Elite agar unreadable plates and TVCs/P. aeruginosa.
BrandType of Samples
Collection		NTM ELITE
Results		TVCs 22 °C CFU/mLTVCs 36 °C CFU/mLP. aeruginosa
CFU/250 mL
1Stockert 3T HCUspre-disinfectionnon-AFB>3 × 103>3 × 103<1
2Stockert 3T HCUspre-disinfectionnon-AFB>3 × 103>3 × 103>150
3Stockert 3T HCUspost-disinfectionmoulds<1<1<1
4Stockert 3T HCUspre-disinfectionnon-AFB>3 × 103>3 × 103>150
5Stockert 3T HCUspre-disinfectionnon-AFB>3 × 103>3 × 103>150
6Stockert 3T HCUspre-disinfectionnon-AFB>3 × 103>3 × 103>150
7Stockert 3T HCUspre-disinfectionmoulds>3 × 103>3 × 103<1
8Stockert 3T HCUspre-disinfectionnon-AFB>3 × 103>3 × 103<1
9Stockert 3T HCUspre-disinfectionnon-AFB>3 × 103>3 × 10315
non-AFB: non-acid fast bacilli; TVC: total viable count; <1: not detected.
Table
Table 5. Proficiency testing results (source: FEPTU report provided to laboratories that examine heater cooler unit (HCU) waters for Mycobacterium spp.)
Table 5. Proficiency testing results (source: FEPTU report provided to laboratories that examine heater cooler unit (HCU) waters for Mycobacterium spp.)
Number of DistributionMicroorganism Strains by Each DistributionCFU/100 mL
MY006 AM. chimaera14
(P. aeruginosa)(1.1 × 102)
MY006 BM. chelonae2.2 × 102
(B. multivorans)(1.5 × 102)
MY008 AM. chelonae5.0 × 102
(Microbacterium spp)(20)
(Staphylococcus xylosus)(42)
MY008 BM. chimaera8.0 × 102
MY009 AM. chelonae5.8 × 10
(E. coli)(90)
MY009 BM. fortuitum30
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ditommaso, S.; Giacomuzzi, M.; Memoli, G.; Garlasco, J.; Curtoni, A.; Iannaccone, M.; Zotti, C.M. A New Culture Method for the Detection of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Water Samples from Heater–Cooler Units and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Machines. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710645

AMA Style

Ditommaso S, Giacomuzzi M, Memoli G, Garlasco J, Curtoni A, Iannaccone M, Zotti CM. A New Culture Method for the Detection of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Water Samples from Heater–Cooler Units and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Machines. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(17):10645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ditommaso, Savina, Monica Giacomuzzi, Gabriele Memoli, Jacopo Garlasco, Antonio Curtoni, Marco Iannaccone, and Carla M. Zotti. 2022. "A New Culture Method for the Detection of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Water Samples from Heater–Cooler Units and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Machines" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 17: 10645. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710645

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop