Next Article in Journal
Emergency Medical Services Calls Analysis for Trend Prediction during Epidemic Outbreaks: Interrupted Time Series Analysis on 2020–2021 COVID-19 Epidemic in Lazio, Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of Microcurrent Therapy for Treating Pressure Ulcers in Older People: A Double-Blind, Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Journal
A Path Model of the Relationship between Mood, Exercise Behavior, Coping, and Mental Health among Malaysians during the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transition from Nurses to Medicalized Elderly Caregivers: Comparison on Willingness between Traditional and Modern Regions in China

1
Department of Pharmacoeconomics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China
2
Center for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China
3
Department of Hospital Group Office, Shenzhen Luohu Hospital Group, Shenzhen 518005, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(10), 5950; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105950
Submission received: 7 April 2022 / Revised: 9 May 2022 / Accepted: 11 May 2022 / Published: 13 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Geriatric and Gerontological Nursing)

Abstract

:
As China is transitioning to an aging society, the Chinese government has proposed an eldercare pattern, called medicalized elderly care, to help solve the rapid aging and health care problems together. However, the shortage of elderly caregivers is a critical issue, with deficiency both in quantity and quality. This study aims to survey nurses’ willingness to transition into medicalized elderly caregivers and compare it between modern and traditional regions. Nurses working in Guangdong (modern region) and Jilin (traditional region) were investigated using a self-administered questionnaire in October 2021. We analyzed the influencing factors through χ²-test, t-test a and binary logistic regression model and further explored the influence of region using propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1227 nurses were included, with 726 (59.2%) of them showing willingness to transition. Nurses from traditional regions showed a significantly higher willingness to transition after PSM (p = 0.027). Other factors influencing nurses’ willingness were age, education, lived with older adults, participated in voluntary activities related to older adults, visited eldercare institutions, attitudes toward older adults, knowledge about older adults, hospice care attitudes and death attitudes. The willingness of nurses to transition was not high enough. To have more willing and skillful human resources for eldercare, we need a more “intimate society for older adults” in the first place.

1. Introduction

The Seventh National Population Census Bulletin (No. 5), released by the National Bureau of Statistics of China, showed that 260 million Chinese people were aged 60 years or older in 2020, accounting for 18.70% of the total population [1]. The constant growth of the older adult population poses a challenge for eldercare resources in China [2]. Therefore, the Chinese government proposed an eldercare pattern that organically integrated pension and medical resources and closely linked up their service functions, called “medicalized elderly care (MEC)”, and actively provided a series of policy orientations. In 2021, the State Council of China issued “Opinions on Strengthening the Work on Aging in the New Era”, which noted that China should further advance the MEC and strengthen personnel team building [3]. There have been rapid developments in MEC in China. By the end of 2020, China had 5857 institutions (1.585 million beds) that can provide MEC services [4]. More than 90% of these eldercare institutions can provide various medical care services for registered older adults. However, many problems remain to be addressed. The quality of caregivers for the elderly in China was at a low level, as most of them were without sufficient knowledge and training on elderly care [5]. The shortage of workforce in terms of both quality and quantity is a prominent problem associated with MEC [6].
In response to strengthening personnel team building in eldercare, nursing personnel training systems in several developed countries have been gradually completed and could be used as references for China. Japan enacted a “Certified Social Worker and Certified Care Worker Act” in 1987, in which “certified care worker” was proposed as an occupation. Furthermore, Japan increased nursing skills operational training and clinical placements while incorporating home care, geriatric care and integrated care practices into nursing practice learning [7]. The multi-disciplinary training system has made Japanese care workers increasingly diverse, laid a solid foundation for elderly caregivers talent training and promoted the improvement of talent quality [8,9]. As for Denmark, schools involved nursing, natural sciences, health sciences, social sciences and human sciences in terms of discipline and professional settings. Students are able to acquire not only a broad theoretical foundation of physical therapy, but also nursing, management, religious and humanistic knowledge, to become compound nursing care talents [10]. Caregivers in Germany are called “care assistants”, and are required to learn psychological, legal, medical professional knowledge and elderly living room design. At the same time, many powerful elderly care enterprises have set up their own training schools, which not only train their own employees but also accept social members to join in. The diversified training methods have sought out potential nursing personnel and strengthened the eldercare staff [11]. Therefore, medicalized elderly caregivers (MEC givers) should be proficient in both professional nursing theory and skills. Moreover, they need learn comprehensive knowledge about older people and respect them. They must also safeguard older adults’ disease treatment and quality of life based on comprehensive services and professionalism, adopt a humanized nursing philosophy and provide hospice care to severely ill older adults [12]. In existing eldercare personnel teams in China, nurses from hospitals are the population best matched to the above-mentioned characteristics and the curricula they took; the work experience they had basically aligns with MEC requirements. They are expected to transition into caregivers and no additional education or training required, in order to strengthen the personnel team building in MEC as quickly as possible.
As of 2019, fewer than 100,000 geriatric nursing staff in China had obtained relevant qualification certificates [13]. Due to the expansion of the older population, the number of disabled people is continuously increasing. It was estimated that 40 million older people had difficulties in basic abilities of daily life in 2015 and this is expected to exceed 100 million by 2050 [14]. According to the internationally recognized standard (one member of nursing staff for every three older adults with disabilities), China still requires more than 13 million eldercare staff [15], which leaves a serious supply and demand imbalance. Therefore, the transition of nurses into MEC givers in China has become a necessary measure to solve the problem of an aging population. It is significant to explore the willingness of nurses to transition into MEC givers and find out the influencing factors to further improve their willingness.
Previously, Dai et al. [16] explored the willingness of 384 senior nurses from 15 hospitals to engage in long-term care for older adults in Henan Province, China, and analyzed their attitudes toward older adults and knowledge of them as influencing factors. In addition, Jang et al. [17] investigated 437 undergraduate nursing students’ willingness to care for older adults in South Korea and the United States, and analyzed influencing factors, such as the frequency of contacting with, sympathy for, and attitudes toward older adults. Furthermore, Che et al. [18] surveyed a total of 1462 nursing students from eleven nursing education institutions in Malaysia, and analyzed the relationship between their intention to work with older adults and their geriatric knowledge. However, most of the above-mentioned studies were conducted with nursing students; few studies have investigated whether nurses already working in hospitals were willing to transition into MEC givers. In addition, when exploring associated influencing factors, previous studies only considered attitudes toward or knowledge about older adults. There is a paucity of studies that comprehensively analyzed multiple factors, such as attitudes toward hospice care, experience of visiting eldercare institutions, participating in older adult-related voluntary activities and understanding of the pattern of MEC. Moreover, a multi-country study evaluated the willingness of nursing students from nine countries (or regions) to care for older adults and concluded that location was a more influential factor [19]. Due to the vast territory and economic disequilibrium in China, the east-to-west and north-to-south variations in the older population are obvious [20]. However, few studies have compared the willingness of nurses in different regions of China to transition into MEC givers. Therefore, our study aims to compare nurses’ willingness to transition into MEC givers in two provinces in China (Guangdong and Jilin) and analyzed influencing factors based on multiple perspectives. The results of the study will be helpful in strengthening personnel team building for MEC.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

In October 2021, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in two provinces (Guangdong and Jilin) in China. In total, 1400 nurses from three hospitals (two in Guangdong: Shenzhen Luohu People’s Hospital, Shenzhen Luohu Medical and Nursing Integrated Geriatrics Hospital; one in Jilin: Jilin Province People’s Hospital) were surveyed using self-designed questionnaires on their willingness of transitioning into MEC givers, attitude toward older adults, knowledge about older adults, hospice care attitude and death attitude.

2.2. Participants

2.2.1. Sample Setting

In the first stage, from the perspective of location, we randomly selected Guangdong Province and Jilin Province to represent southern and northern regions. In the second stage, from the perspective of aging level, Shenzhen city in Guangdong and Changchun city in Jilin were selected to represent “modern” and “traditional” regions. Residents in Shenzhen aged 60 years or older in 2020 accounted for 5.36% of the total population which was much lower than the national level (18.7%), while that in Changchun accounted for 20.85% of the total population which was significantly higher than Shenzhen. In the third stage, considering the proportion of the number of third-class hospitals (22 in Shenzhen and 23 in Changchun), we randomly selected one hospital group in two cities (Shenzhen Luohu Medical and Nursing Integrated Geriatrics Hospital is actually a subsidiary hospital of Shenzhen Luohu People’s Hospital).

2.2.2. Objectives

Participants were recruited using a convenient sampling and snowball sampling method. First, a sample of nurses from three hospitals were randomly selected as respondents and then they recommended other nurses for who the survey objectives were relevant to achieve a snowball effect. The inclusion criteria were nurses that: (1) were currently (at time of study) or previously engaged in geriatric nursing-related work; (2) gave informed consent and voluntarily participated in this questionnaire study; and (3) clearly expressed their own viewpoints and had good orientation to time, place and person. Participants that had a history of mental illness or disturbance of consciousness were excluded. A quality control question, a digital questionnaire platform and the time taken to answer the questionnaire were used to exclude those that were not answered seriously. Finally, 1400 nurses’ information was collected. Questionnaire Star software 2.0.91 (Survey Star Corp, Changsha, China) was used to import data from the collected electronic versions of the questionnaires into Excel format.

2.3. Instruments

The self-designed questionnaire used in this study comprised six parts. (1) General information, containing 13 items reflecting demographic characteristics (region, gender, age, religion, education, household registration, single child or not), whether they lived with older people, whether they had close contact with older adult relatives, and their knowledge of and attitudes toward MEC. (2) Willingness of transitioning from nurses to MEC givers. (3) Attitude toward older adults, assessed using Kogan’s Attitude toward Older People Scale (KAOPS). Developed by Kogan [21], the KAOPS contains 34 items and responses are on a 6-point Likert scale, with a total score of 34–204 points. A higher score indicates more positive attitudes toward older adults. (4) Knowledge about older adults, evaluated using the Facts on Aging Quiz (FAQ). Developed by Palmore [22], this FAQ scale contains 25 items and uses multiple options (“yes”, “no” and “do not know”) to determine participants’ knowledge, with a total score of 0–25 points. A higher score indicates better knowledge about older adults. (5) Hospice care attitude, assessed using the Frommelt Attitudes Toward Care of the Dying Scale Form B (FATCOD-B), which was developed by Frommelt [23]. The FATCOD-B contains 29 items, with responses on a 5-point Likert scale and a total scale score of 29–145. A higher score indicates more positive attitudes toward care of the dying. (6) Death attitude, evaluated using Death Attitude Profile Revised (DAP-R), compiled by Wong et al. [24]. This scale contains 32 items in five dimensions: fear of death (DF), death avoidance (DA), natural acceptance (NA), approach acceptance (AA) and escape acceptance (EA). Responses are on a 5-point Likert scale; a higher score for a dimension indicates the participant’s attitude is closer to that dimension. All the scales were translated into Chinese and were found to have excellent reliability and validity [25,26,27,28,29,30].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

2.4.1. Descriptive Analysis

General data underwent descriptive statistical analysis, with count data expressed as n (%) and differences between two groups determined by χ²-test. Measurement data were expressed as means (M) ± standard deviation (SD), and between-group differences were evaluated using t-test.

2.4.2. Regression Analysis

Using nurses’ willingness to transition into caregivers as the dependent variable, and general characteristics, the total KAOPS, FAQ, and FATCOD-B scores, and the scores for the five DAP-R dimensions as the independent variables, variables were entered into the regression model at α = 0.05 and excluded from the regression model at α = 0.10.
The basic form of the logistic regression model is given by Equation (1):
P i = F ( y ) = e α + i = 1 n β i x i 1 + e α + i = 1 n β i x i
Logistic transformation of Equation (1) gives a linear regression model between the probability function and independent variables, as shown in Equation (2):
ln P i 1 P i = α + i = 1 n β i x i
P i represents the probability of nurses transitioning into MEC givers; y is the dependent variable, indicating whether nurses were willing to transition into MEC givers (willing = 1 and unwilling = 0); x i is the independent variable (the i -th influencing factor); and β i is the regression coefficient of the independent variable. All results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical analyses.

2.4.3. Region Differences Comparisons

To compare the influence of traditional and modern regions on nurses’ willingness, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) to control for confounding factors. Using nearest-neighbor matching, participants were grouped by workplace and matched for all other factors, with a matching tolerance of 0.02.

3. Results

3.1. Basic Characteristics and Willingness to Transition

Table 1 shows the basic characteristics of 1227 included respondents. The overall rate of willingness to transition was 59.2% (n = 726). Factors with significant differences in nurses’ willingness to transition into MEC givers were age (p = 0.001), living with older people (p < 0.001), having close contact with older adult relatives (p < 0.001), participating in older-adult-related voluntary activities (p < 0.001), visiting eldercare institutions, such as nursing homes (p < 0.001), knowing the eldercare pattern of MEC (p < 0.001) and agreeing to implement the MEC in China (p = 0.031).

3.2. Comparison of Scale Scores by Willingness to Transition into Caregivers

Table 2 shows mean scores and standard deviations for two different groups of nurses who were willing/unwilling to transition into MEC givers for each of the scales. We found that higher scores of KAOPS, FAQ and FATCOD-B (all ps < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher willingness.

3.3. Factors Influencing Nurses’ Transition Willingness

Table 3 shows factors that influenced nurses’ willingness for transitioning into MEC givers. We found that nurses from Jilin were more willing than those from Guangdong. Nurses between the ages of 31 and 39 had less willingness than ≥40. Nurses with the highest education in technical secondary schools or below were more willing than those who had masters’ degrees. Nurses who lived with older people, had close contact with older adult relatives, participated in voluntary activities related to older adults and visited eldercare institutions, such as nursing homes, had more willingness than those who had not experienced these. The higher scores of KAOPS, FAQ, FATCOD-B and DAP-R indicated that those nurses were more willing to transition into MEC givers.

3.4. Influence of Regional Factors on Nurses’ Willingness to Transition into Caregivers

To further explore the influence of nurses’ region, we balanced confounding factors using PSM and then examined differences in nurses’ willingness to transition into caregivers between Guangdong and Jilin, and the results are shown in Table 4.
Finally, 335 pairs (770 participants) were matched successfully among 1227 participants. Before matching, there were significant differences in gender, age, education, household registration, etc. (all ps < 0.05). After matching, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in any analyzed factor (all ps > 0.05), with the exceptions of age and education. After matching, nurses in Jilin (n = 218, 65.1%) still showed a higher willingness to transition compared to those in Guangdong (n = 190, 56.7%), indicating that region had a prominent influence on nurses’ willingness to transition into MEC givers.

4. Discussion

The results of this study provided insights into how hospital nurses were willing to transition into MEC givers in China. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, less than 60% of the nurses surveyed were willing to transition into MEC givers. Second, nurses’ willingness is highly associated with their attitude towards death and experiences with older people. Personal contact with older people allows nurses to gain deeper understanding of older adults, which may reverse incorrect stereotypes regarding the job of an elderly caregiver. Further, attitudes toward hospice care and death and knowledge of older people are essential factors that influence nurses’ decisions about working as professional caregivers. The above finding is consistent with many other studies [31,32,33,34,35] and can be explained by the “knowledge–attitude–behavior” theory [36]. The profound influence of traditional culture and Confucianism mean that Chinese people attach importance to the interdependence between generations. Nurses who were mainly cared for by older people when they were young had more positive attitudes toward older adults than nurses who were not cared for by older people [37]. Several studies indicated that knowledge about aging plays a major role in professionals’ positive attitudes [38,39,40,41]. Developing correct knowledge of aging is conducive for caregivers to cultivate optimistic attitudes toward older adults and hospice care, and these positive attitudes help improve people’s beliefs and behaviors.
Interestingly, our finding indicates that nurses from the traditional region (Jilin) had higher willingness to transition into MEC givers than nurses from a relatively modern region (Guangdong). The two regions in this study, which were selected from the northeastern and southern parts of China, have marked differences in their geographic location, customs, culture and economic development level. Guangdong on the southern coast is a province with a developed economy, large population and high urbanization level. The migrant population accounts for 17% of the total population in Guangdong, meaning it is regarded as a modern “stranger society”. Jilin, in the northeastern region, has a relatively low level of economic development, with most of the population being concentrated in rural areas, and it is considered a traditional “acquaintance society”. In the present study, we found a significant difference in nurses’ willingness to transition into caregivers between Guangdong and Jilin before PSM (p = 0.006). To verify the influence of region on nurses’ willingness, we used PSM to control for independent variables, such as demographic characteristics and associated life experiences, thereby reducing the interference of confounding factors on the regional difference in nurses’ willingness. Among the participants after PSM at 1:1, we observed a significantly higher proportion of nurses willing to transition into caregivers in Jilin than in Guangdong (65.1% vs. 56.7%; p = 0.027). Therefore, there was a considerable difference in nurses’ willingness to transition into caregivers in the northeastern and southern provinces of China based on regional characteristics.
While Mohammad et al. [42] found that most nurse participants have at least one misconception (88.6%) and hold at least one negative attitude (89.8%), which reveals that even in a country with high religious observance and close family ties, ageism exists in healthcare settings because of nurses’ poor knowledge and attitudes toward older adults. Dai et al. [16] surveyed willingness to engage in long-term care for older adults and influencing factors among 384 senior nurses. They found that more than 60% of nurse participants were unwilling to engage in long-term care for older adults, with this unwillingness mainly related to self-rated health, being busy taking care of family and salary. There were some differences between our results and those of previous studies. It can be inferred that the environmental change and salary adjustment faced by occupational transition may be more sensitive topics among young people. Therefore, we suggest that hospitals or communities may conduct lectures for MEC givers, and provide relevant publicity posters, so that nurses can learn about the caregiver occupation outside of work. Nurses who had participated in older-adult-related activities held more positive attitudes toward transitioning into the caregiver occupation. These close correlations suggested that effective human resource management of caregivers should comprehensively cover relevant knowledge, attitudes and behaviors. The differing transition willingness of nurses between Guangdong and Jilin indicates that the central and local governments of China should conduct comprehensive planning in the context of vast national territory and also adjust measures to local conditions based on localized characteristics when designing and planning personnel team building of caregivers to integrate medical care and eldercare services. However, there are many other influencing factors that may underlie the regional difference (e.g., regional economic development level, traditional customs, and nurses’ salary), which need to be explored in further research.
To our knowledge, few studies have used PSM as a statistical method to explore the relationship between geographical region and nurses’ willingness to transition into MEC givers. The present study compared the differences in nurses with transition willingness between traditional and modern regions innovatively, and balanced confounding factors. This study also combined a multi-dimensional self-designed questionnaire with the KAOPS, FAQ, FATCOD-B and DAP-R scales to investigate the influencing factors, as well as the possible measurements to help improve willingness based on large sample data. However, this study also had some limitations. First, this is a cross-sectional design, which is a one-time data collection study that failed to determine the causality relationship between variables, so further research should use a longitudinal study, at various time points, to understand the dynamics in willingness to transition. Second, the use of convenience sampling and random sampling may also affect the likelihood of selection bias. The respective samples for each city were only chosen in one or two hospitals, which cannot represent the entire population of nurses from hospitals in that region. Third, the self-designed scale did not fully survey all possible factors influencing nurses’ willingness, such as salary level and job department.

5. Conclusions

This study explored Chinese nurses’ willingness to transition into MEC givers and analyzed factors influencing willingness to transition based on multiple perspectives. The outcomes of the study may assist personnel identification to support the pattern of MEC in China during aging transformation. That is, the main force of MEC going forward will be nurses that have experience of intimate contact with older people, sufficient knowledge of and positive attitudes toward older adults, aging, hospice care, and death, and that live in an “acquaintance society”, characterized by “human culture”. As the age of nurses increases, their willingness to transition into caregivers also increases. Therefore, we suggest that nurses should actively participate in older-adult-related practical activities and cultivate a positive service awareness during close contact with older people. In addition, hospitals and communities should implement publicity activities, such as posters or lectures related to MEC givers. Furthermore, subsequent research should consider evaluating the adequacy of older-adult-related practical activities in providing older-adult-care knowledge and skills and their implementation plans to identify training gaps.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.T.; Data curation, W.G., S.L. and Z.C.; Formal analysis, W.G. and S.L.; Funding acquisition, W.T.; Investigation, F.G. and W.T.; Methodology, W.G. and S.L.; Resources, F.G.; Software, W.G. and S.L.; Supervision, W.T.; Validation, W.G., S.L. and Z.C.; Visualization, W.G.; Writing—original draft, W.G. and S.L.; Writing—review and editing, W.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72174207).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Luohu Hospital in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Audrey Holmes for editing the English text of a draft.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. National Bureau of Statistics. The Seventh National Population Census Bulletin (No.5). Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/ztjc/zdtjgz/zgrkpc/dqcrkpc/ggl/202105/t20210519_1817698.html (accessed on 4 December 2021).
  2. Yang, W.; Wu, B.; Tan, S.Y.; Li, B.; Lou, V.W.Q.; Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; Fletcher, J.R.; Carrino, L.; Hu, B.; et al. Understanding Health and Social Challenges for Aging and Long-Term Care in China. Res. Aging 2020, 43, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chinese Communist Party Central Committee, State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Opinions on Strengthening the Work on Ageing in the New Era. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-11/24/content_5653181.htm (accessed on 18 December 2021).
  4. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. The Development of the Cause of the Elderly and the Planning of the Service System for the Aged in the “14th Five-Year Plan”. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2022-02/21/content_5674844.htm (accessed on 22 September 2021).
  5. Zeng, Y.; Hu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhen, X.; Gu, Y.; Sun, X.; Dong, H. The quality of caregivers for the elderly in long-term care institutions in Zhejiang Province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Feng, Z.; Glinskaya, E.; Chen, H.; Gong, S.; Qiu, Y.; Xu, J.; Yip, W. Long-term care system for older adults in China: Policy landscape, challenges, and future prospects. Lancet 2020, 396, 1362–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. Report of the Study Group on Basic Nursing Education. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/newpage_07297.html (accessed on 2 May 2022).
  8. Nakanishi, M.; Niimura, J.; Endo, K.; Nishida, A. Regional Supply of Nursing Home and Hospital Beds Determine Discharge Destination of Nursing Home Residents in Japan. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2016, 17, 671–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gospel, H. Varieties of qualifications, training, and skills in long-term care: A German, Japanese, and UK Comparison. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2015, 54, 833–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schmidt, M.; Schmidt, S.; Adelborg, K.; Sundbøll, J.; Laugesen, K.; Ehrenstein, V.; Sørensen, H.T. The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: From health care contacts to database records. Clin. Epidemiol. 2019, 11, 563–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dauth, C.; Lang, J. Can the unemployed be trained to care for the elderly? The effects of subsidized training in elderly care. Health Econ. 2019, 28, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. National Occupational Standards for Old-Age Caregivers. Available online: http://www.mca.gov.cn/article/xw/tzgg/201910/20191000020446.shtml (accessed on 4 March 2022).
  13. Wang, L.X.; Huang, X.L. Community pension service countermeasures from the perspective of medical and nursing care integration. Acad. Exch. 2020, 11, 143–152. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dang, J.W. Blue Book of Aging: Survey Report on the Living Conditions of China’s Urban and Rural Older Persons; Social Sciences Academic Press: Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xinhua Net. Report on the Development of Healthy Endowment Industry in China: Talent Chapter. 2016. Available online: http://www.xinhuanet.com/gongyi/yanglao/2017-01/24/c_129457792.htm (accessed on 23 September 2021).
  16. Dai, F.M.; Zhang, X.; Wan, Q.L.; Cao, J.L.; Chen, Y.R. The willingness and influencing factors of senior nurses to engage in long-term care services for the elderly. Chin. Gen. Prac. 2014, 1724, 2880–2884. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jang, I.; Oh, D.; Kim, Y.S. Factors associated with nursing students’ willingness to care for older adults in Korea and the United States. Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 2019, 6, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Che, C.C.; Chong, M.C.; Hairi, N.N. What influences student nurses’ intention to work with older people? A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2018, 85, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cheng, H.L.; Lam, S.C.; Cruz, J.P.; Almazan, J.U.; Machuca-Contreras, F.A.; Cecily, H.S.J.; Rady, H.E.A.E.A.; Papathanasiou, I.V.; Ghrayeb, F.; Qtait, M.; et al. Willingness to care for older people and associated factors in pre-registered student nurses: A multi-country survey study. Nurse Educ. Today 2022, 110, 105279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Han, Y.; He, Y.; Lyu, J.; Yu, C.; Bian, M.; Lee, L. Aging in China: Perspectives on public health. Glob. Health J. 2020, 4, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kogan, N. Attitudes toward old people: The development of a scale and an examination of correlates. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 1961, 62, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Palmore, E. Facts on aging. A short quiz. Gerontologist 1977, 17, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Frommelt, K.H. The effects of death education on nurses’ attitudes toward caring for terminally ill persons and their families. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care 1991, 8, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wong, P.T.; Reker, G.T.; Gesser, G. Death Attitude Profile-Revised: A multidi-mensional measure of attitudes toward death. Death Anxiety Handb. Res. Instrum. Appl. 1994, 121, 121–148. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhao, S.Y.; Zhang, H.J.; Liu, T.; Liu, L.; Li, C.J. A study of the reliability validity of Kogan’s scale of attitudes toward older adults. Chin. J. Nurs. 2012, 47, 831–833. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, C.C.; Liao, W.C.; Kuo, P.C.; Yuan, S.C.; Chuang, H.L.; Lo, H.C.; Liao, H.Y.; Elaine, M.; Lee, M.C.; Yen, C.H. The Chinese version of the Facts on Aging Quiz scale: Reliability and validity assessment. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2010, 47, 742–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.E.; Ma, Y.L.; Yang, W.L.; Alison, W.; Chen, J. Introduction and validation of Palmore geriatric knowledge scale. J. Nurs. 2015, 22, 40–42. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, L.P.; Li, Y.J.; Yan, W.Z.; Li, G.M. Development and Psychometric Testing Chinese Version of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale, Form B in Nurses and Nursing Students. J. Cancer Educ. 2016, 31, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhu, H.L.; Shi, B.X. Chinese edition of the Study of the Reliability Validity of the Revised Scale of Death Attitude Depictions. Chin. J. Prac. Nurs. 2011, 8, 51–53. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tang, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.X.; Zhou, L.J.; Cui, J.; Meng, X.L.; Zhao, J.J. Chinese edition of the Death Attitude Depiction Scale for reliability analysis of nurse populations. J. Nurs. Sci. 2014, 29, 64–66. [Google Scholar]
  31. López-Hernández, L.; Martínez-Arnau, F.M.; Castellano-Rioja, E.; Botella-Navas, M.; Pérez-Ros, P. Factors Affecting Attitudes towards Older People in Undergraduate Nursing Students. Healthcare 2021, 9, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Salin, S.; Hautsalo, K.; Vänni, K.; Seitsamo, S.; Yli-Koivisto, L. Finnish nurse students’ attitudes towards older adults and the teaching of gerontological nursing–A survey study. Nurse Educ. Today 2020, 88, 104379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Muhsin, A.A.; Munyogwa, M.J.; Kibusi, S.M.; Seif, S.A. Poor level of knowledge on elderly care despite positive attitude among nursing students in Zanzibar Island: Findings from a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs. 2020, 19, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bowden, A.; Chang, H.C.R.; Wilson, V.; Traynor, V. The impact of ageing simulation education on healthcare professionals to promote person-centred care towards older people: A literature review. Nurse Educ. Pract. 2021, 53, 103077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Galzignato, S.; Veronese, N.; Sartori, R. Study of the attitudes and future intentions of nursing students towards working with older people: An observational study. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2021, 33, 3117–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, H.; Sun, H. Knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy of elderly caregivers in Chinese nursing homes: A cross-sectional study in Liaoning Province. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e29869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.H.; Zhang, H.F.; Meng, L.N.; Liu, P.X. Determinants of undergraduate nursing students’ care willingness towards the elderly in China: Attitudes, gratitude and knowledge. Nurse Educ. Today 2016, 43, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Deschodt, M.; de Casterlé, B.D.; Milisen, K. Gerontological care in nursing education programmes. J. Adv. Nurs. 2010, 66, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Roethler, C.; Adelman, T.; Parsons, V. Assessing emergency nurses’ geriatric knowledge and perceptions of their geriatric care. J. Emerg. Nurs. 2011, 37, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ferreira, V.M.; Ruiz, T. Community health workers’ attitudes and beliefs toward the elderly. Rev. Saude Publica 2012, 46, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Liu, Y.E.; Norman, I.J.; While, A.E. Nurses’ attitudes towards older people and working with older patients: An explanatory model. J. Nurs. Manag. 2015, 23, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rababa, M.; Hammouri, A.M.; Hweidi, I.M.; Ellis, J.L. Association of nurses’ level of knowledge and attitudes to ageism toward older adults: Cross-sectional study. Nurs. Health Sci. 2020, 22, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Participants’ general information and willingness to transition into MEC givers.
Table 1. Participants’ general information and willingness to transition into MEC givers.
VariablesCases (%)Willingness (%)χ²p
Region 0.0150.903
Guangdong Province693 (56.5)409 (59.0)
Jilin Province534 (43.5)317 (59.4)
Gender 0.1000.752
Male56 (4.6)32 (57.1)
Female1171 (95.4)694 (59.3)
Age 13.1270.001
≤30388 (31.6)228 (58.8)
31~39514 (41.9)280 (54.5)
≥40325 (26.5)218 (67.1)
Education 3.1870.364
Technical secondary school or below37 (3.0)27 (73.0)
Junior college286 (23.3)170 (59.4)
Bachelor’s degree877 (71.5)514 (58.6)
Master’s degree or above27 (2.2)15 (55.6)
Household registration 0.0980.755
Urban areas591 (48.2)347 (58.7)
Rural areas636 (51.8)379 (59.6)
Religious belief 0.0230.879
Yes117 (9.5)70 (59.8)
No1110 (90.5)656 (59.1)
Only child or not 0.0310.859
Yes320 (26.1)188 (58.8)
No907 (73.9)538 (59.3)
Whether they lived with older people17.525<0.001
Yes955 (77.8)595 (62.3)
No272 (22.2)131 (48.2)
Whether they had close contact with older adult relatives42.861<0.001
Yes959 (78.2)614 (64.0)
No268 (21.8)112 (41.8)
Whether they participated in older adult-related voluntary activities75.246<0.001
Yes498 (40.6)368 (73.9)
No729 (59.4)358 (49.1)
Whether they visited eldercare institutions such as nursing homes53.745<0.001
Yes 578 (47.1)405 (70.1)
No649 (52.9)321 (49.5)
Whether they knew the eldercare pattern of MEC15.904<0.001
Yes902 (73.5)564 (62.5)
No325 (26.5)162 (49.8)
Whether they agreed to implement the MEC in China4.6700.031
Yes998 (81.3)605 (60.6)
No229 (18.7)121 (52.8)
Table 2. Comparison of attitude scale scores by willingness/unwillingness to transition into MEC givers.
Table 2. Comparison of attitude scale scores by willingness/unwillingness to transition into MEC givers.
VariablesWillingness (n = 726)Unwillingness (n = 501)tp
KAOPS score133.97 ± 18.34123.36 ± 17.1910.218<0.001
FAQ score11.69 ± 3.1010.58 ± 3.375.918<0.001
FATCOD-B score97.90 ± 10.1892.43 ± 7.3410.321<0.001
DAP-R scale
Death fear DF20.10 ± 5.1320.67 ± 4.91−1.9630.05
Death avoidance DA15.42 ± 3.8915.56 ± 3.84−0.6570.512
Natural acceptance NA18.18 ± 3.4717.98 ± 3.450.9840.325
Approach acceptance AA29.89 ± 7.0229.44 ± 6.751.1380.255
Escape acceptance EA14.24 ± 4.0814.65 ± 3.95−1.7460.081
Table 3. Binary logistic regression analysis of nurses’ willingness to transition.
Table 3. Binary logistic regression analysis of nurses’ willingness to transition.
VariablesBSEWald χ²p
Region (Guangdong)
Jilin 0.4440.3320.6370.006
Age (≥40)
≤30−0.3720.1973.5490.060
31~39−0.4090.1765.3950.020
Education (Master’s degree or above)
Technical secondary school or below1.6170.6346.5140.011
Junior college0.8920.5033.1470.076
Bachelor’s degree0.7560.4872.4060.121
Whether they lived with older people (No)
Yes0.4760.1707.8330.005
Whether they had close contact with older adult relatives (No)
Yes0.4340.1676.7970.009
Whether they participated in voluntary activities related to older adults (No)
Yes0.7370.15522.672<0.001
Whether they visited eldercare institutions such as nursing homes (No)
Yes0.4080.1487.6020.006
KAOPS score0.0300.00446.420<0.001
FAQ score0.0590.0227.4300.006
FATCOD-B score0.0640.01045.197<0.001
DAP-R scale
Natural acceptance NA0.0810.02411.0150.001
Approach acceptance AA0.0370.0165.3430.021
Table 4. Comparison of willingness to transition in Guangdong and Jilin before and after matching.
Table 4. Comparison of willingness to transition in Guangdong and Jilin before and after matching.
VariablesBefore PSMpAfter PSMp
Guangdong (n = 693)Jilin (n = 534)Guangdong (n = 335)Jilin (n = 335)
Whether they had willingness to transition into caregivers
Yes4093170.0061902180.027
Gender <0.001 0.247
Male4511 1711
Female648523 318324
Age <0.001 0.004
≤3030088 8771
31~39239275 131174
≥40154171 11790
Education <0.001 0.008
Technical secondary school or below298 124
Junior college182104 6473
Bachelor’s degree460417 245255
Master’s degree or above225 143
Household registration <0.001 0.487
Urban areas250341 164173
Rural areas443193 171162
Only child or not <0.001 1.000
Yes89231 8282
No604303 253253
Whether they lived with older people<0.001 0.644
Yes577378 262257
No116156 7378
Whether they participated in voluntary activities related to older adults<0.001 0.752
Yes314184 135131
No379350 200204
Whether they visited eldercare institutions such as nursing homes<0.001 0.877
Yes366212 159157
No327322 176178
Whether they knew the eldercare pattern of MEC<0.001 0.605
Yes539363 239245
No154171 9690
KAOPS scale131.32 ± 17.70127.45 ± 19.55<0.001128.80 ± 17.05128.32 ± 20.560.744
FATCOD-B scale96.66 ± 9.5694.38 ± 9.31<0.00195.34 ± 9.3795.52 ± 9.780.812
DAP-R scale
Escape acceptance EA14.16 ± 3.9214.72 ± 4.150.01714.66 ± 3.9614.66 ± 4.310.985
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, W.; Li, S.; Chi, Z.; Gong, F.; Tang, W. Transition from Nurses to Medicalized Elderly Caregivers: Comparison on Willingness between Traditional and Modern Regions in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105950

AMA Style

Gao W, Li S, Chi Z, Gong F, Tang W. Transition from Nurses to Medicalized Elderly Caregivers: Comparison on Willingness between Traditional and Modern Regions in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(10):5950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105950

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Wenqing, Shuailong Li, Zhuoyuan Chi, Fangfang Gong, and Wenxi Tang. 2022. "Transition from Nurses to Medicalized Elderly Caregivers: Comparison on Willingness between Traditional and Modern Regions in China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 10: 5950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105950

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop