The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Older Adults’ Decision-Making Related to Health, and Health and Social Care Services in Daily Life—A Scoping Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Identifying the Research Question
- What types of ICT are used for decision-making in relation to health, and health and social care services from the perspective of older adults?
- In what ways is ICT used for decision-making in relation to health, and health and social care services from the perspective of older adults?
- Which factors can influence ICT use for decision-making in relation to health, and health and social care services from the perspective of older adults?
2.2. Identifying Relevant Studies
2.3. Selecting Studies
2.4. Charting the Data
2.5. Analysing the Data
- All included articles were read several times to identify relevant content;
- Relevant content was grouped into three broad categories corresponding to the research questions and refined into eight subcategories.
2.6. Ethical Considerations
Authors (Year) Country | Study Aim | Design and Methods | Participants (Sample Size), Age | ICT Characteristics | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Algilani, Langius-Eklöf, Kihlgren, Blomberg (2016), Sweden [50]. | To develop and test feasibility and acceptability of an interactive ICT platform integrated in a tablet for collecting and managing patient-reported concerns of older adults in home care. | Mixed-method design Interviews Logged quantitative data | Older adults (n = 8), 67–90 years old Nurses (n = 3) | ICT platform for assessment of health and wellbeing, healthcare advice and links to websites for information, risk assessment model for alerts, connection to a monitoring web interface, graphs to view reported health concerns. | Via the platform, self-care advice was regarded by the participants as a good asset when they needed information on health issues and what they could do themselves. It enabled communication between them and the nurses, and could facilitate participation. The platform had relevant content and was perceived to be easy to use although technical challenges were identified (e.g., issues related to font size and logging in). |
Demiris, Thompson, Boquet, Shomir, Chaudhuri, Chung (2013), USA [51]. | To evaluate the perceived usability and effectiveness of a telehealth wellness kiosk in an independent retirement community as well as privacy considerations. | Qualitative design Focus groups | Older adults (n = 12), 65 years or older | A telehealth kiosk for assessment of physiological parameters, online questionnaires, a library of educational videos, and a brain fitness web-based software solution. | The participants appreciated the cognitive assessments and to frequently capture physiological parameters. Printouts of the data made it possible to share data with family and clinicians. The older adults valued health-related decision-making and saw the telehealth kiosk as a tool to improve independence and control over their health status. Technical challenges were identified (e.g., problems to handle computer mouse). |
Demiris, Thompson, Reeder, Wilamowska, Zaslavsky (2013), USA [52]. | To demonstrate how informatics applications can support the assessment and visualization of older adults’ wellness. | Mixed method design Measurements Questionnaires Focus groups | Older adults (n = 27), 78–94 years old | A platform that integrates three components; a software application capturing functional parameters, a telehealth kiosk, a software application assessing cognitive parameters. | The participants had positive experiences of the ability to capture vital signs and transmit via Bluetooth, and the possibilities with a personal journal for sharing information with family and caregivers. Engagement in cognitive performance activities was appreciated, and the opportunity to socialize and interact with others in the community. Technical support from staff and diverse tools for user preferences were needed. |
Dupuy, Consel, Sauzeon (2016), France [53]. | To promote self determination-based theory into the design of gerontechnologies. | Quantitative design Platform development and evaluation Questionnaires | Older adults (n = 34), 82 years old on average | An assisted living platform for applications that utilize a range of devices (e.g., motion detectors, contact sensors, smart switches) and software components (e.g., calendar, photo album, address book). | The use of the platform improved self-determination performance; autonomy, self-regulation, empowerment, and self-realization of the participants. The platform could enable the user to make decisions about assistance needed to live autonomously and conduct meaningful activities. Easy to use technology. |
Göransson, Wengström, Ziegert, Langius-Eklöf, Blomberg (2020), Sweden [54]. | To describe and evaluate the experiences of self-care support and sense of security among older persons using an interactive app to report health concerns. | Mixed method design Measurements Questionnaires Interviews | Older adults (n = 17), 70–101 years old | An interactive ICT-platform for application in smartphones or tablets, and used in the assessment of health concerns and self-care support among older persons with home care. Included access to self-care advice, graphs and risk assessment sending alerts to nurses. | The platform was used for self-care advice in different ways by the participants, and was perceived to provide accurate information. The self-care advice could be a trigger to search for more health-related knowledge. It was beneficial to access advice directly without the need to contact healthcare staff. The platform was perceived as a way to interact and communicate with the healthcare staff. |
Göransson, Eriksson, Ziegert, Wengström, Langius-Eklöf, Brovall, Kihlgren, Blomberg (2018), Sweden [55]. | To explore the experiences of using an app among older people with home-based health care and their nurses. | Qualitative design Interviews Focus groups | Older adults (n = 17), 70–101 years old. Nurses (n = 12) | An interactive ICT-platform for application in smartphones or tablets, and used in the assessment of health concerns and self-care support among older persons with home care. Included access to self-care advice, graphs and risk assessment sending alerts to nurses. | Via the platform, the participants were stimulated to learn about their health concerns. Self-care advice increased their ability to care for themselves and supported self-confidence. Also, it enhanced communication and enabled participants to report health concerns more precisely. Their self-confidence increased as they were able to use the technology. Technical challenges were identified (e.g., issues related to font size on buttons and logging in). |
Harrefors, Axelsson, Sävenstedt (2010), Sweden [56]. | To describe healthy older couples’ perceptions of using assistive technology services when needing assistance with care. | Qualitative design Interviews | Older adults (n = 23), 70–83 years old. | Technology services from technical aids for daily living to IT-based services for security, communication and remote consultation | Regular health monitoring made the participants feeling more secure at home. Technology could assist and support older persons in frail health, and was a way to communicate with nursing staff and friends. Also, it was perceived to provide an opportunity to live at home for a longer time. |
Irizarry, Shoemake, Lee Nilsen, Czaja, Beach, DeVito Dabbs (2017), USA [57]. | To explore attitudes toward portal adoption and its perceived usefulness as a tool for health care engagement among older adults with varying levels of health literacy and degrees of prior patient portal use. | Mixed method design Phone survey Focus groups | Older adults (n = 100), 65–97 years old. | Patient portals in general for access to personal health information and patient-provider communication. Examples of common portal features are health information, medication management, health results, and communication and appointment setting. | Overall, the participants reported that it was valuable to have all their personal medical information and clinician contact information in one place. As for health information in the portal, the experiences of the participants varied (e.g., some lacked individualized information). Outdated or incorrect medical data in the portal led to frustration among older adults. There was a need for training and support to manage technology. |
Dickman Portz, Bayliss, Bull, Boxer, Bekelman, Gleason, Czaja (2019), USA [58]. | To use the technology acceptance model as a framework for qualitatively describing the user interphase and experience, intent to use, and use behaviors among older patients with multiple chronic conditions. | Qualitative design Focus groups | Older adults (n = 24), 65 years and older | A patient portal providing personal health information related to patient diagnosis, prescriptions, laboratory results, vaccination records. Health management features that are designed to foster healthy eating and exercise habits incorporate personalized assessments and self-management health tools. | The participants thought that the portal was useful for get access to health information and addressing health concerns without a clinic visit, especially for those living in rural areas. The portal was seen as useful for communicating with healthcare providers. Participants felt confident when they managed to use the portal. Although the portal was perceived as easy to use, technical challenges were also identifed (e.g., issues related to font size or logging in). |
Robben, Perry, Huisjes, van Nieuwenhuijzen, Schers, van Weel, Olde Rikkert, van Achterberg, Heinen, Melis (2012), The Netherlands [59]. | To establish the outcomes of the implementation process of the Health and Welfare Information Portal, which implementation strategies and barriers and facilitators contributed to these outcomes, and how its future implementation could be improved. | Mixed method design Survey Interviews | Older adults (n = 290), 70 years and older Professionals (GPS:s, nurses, gerontological social workers, other) (n = 169) | A personal, Internet-based conference table for multidisciplinary communication and information exchange for frail older people, their informal caregivers, and professionals. The table is considered to be both a shared electronic health record and personal health record. | Via the portal, the participants could keep control over their own care. The older adults’ messages were quickly answered by their own general practitioner. It enhanced participation of informal caregivers and general practitioners and facilitated the involvement of older adults. Although the portal was perceived as user-friendly, barriers for the older adults were found such as not being comfortable with using computers or not being familiar with the portal. |
Schmidt, Behrens, Lautenschlaeger Gaertner, Luderer (2019), Germany [60]. | To gain a better understanding of how care and case management (CCM) in general is perceived by older people (65+) living alone and what they think about the CCM monitoring process used during video conferences. | Mixed method design Interviews Measurements | Older adults (n = 40), 64–92 years old (inclusion criteria was 65 years or older) | Video conferences via tablet PCs enabling information and advice from nurses and social workers, and communication between older adults. Possibility to download further information material. | Video conferencing was perceived by the participants as valuable for social contact and communication. People with reduced mobility found it useful to have access to case managers and other healthcare professionals for support and advice (e.g., carers, physiotherapists, social workers, dentists). It compensated for isolation and enabled independent participation. The main problem with technology was poor internet connection in rural areas. Also, need for touch function training was identified. |
Willard, Cremers, Man, van Rossum, Spreeuwenberg, de Witte (2018), The Netherlands [61]. | To support frail older adults in their independence and functioning, by stimulating self-care and providing reliable information, products and services. | Mixed method design Observations Interviews Measurements | Older adults (n = 33) 65 years and older | Online community care platform containing 11 functions; emergency call, services, contacts, clock, calendar, medication reminder, news, sending and receiving messages, information about the community, information from municipalities, and games. | The participants mainly used the platform functions of contacts, services and messaging. The platform was regarded to contribute to the social participation, the self-management competencies, and with their social cohesion in the community. However, only a minority thought that the platform had added value to them. Although the participants perceived the platform easy to use there were some technical challenges (e.g., issues related to logging in, and function arrangement). |
3. Results
3.1. Study Characteristics
3.2. Summary of Key Findings
3.2.1. Form and Function of ICT for Decision-Making
Online Platforms
Web-Based Portals
Other ICT-Based Services
3.2.2. Perceived Value and Effect of ICT for Decision-Making
Accessing and Sharing Information
Communicating and Interacting with Others
Being More Independent and Secure
3.2.3. Factors Influencing ICT Use for Decision-Making
Relevant Content Based on User Needs
Training, Support and Technical Issues
4. Discussion
Methodological Strengths and Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bitar, H.; Alismail, S. The role of eHealth, telehealth, and telemedicine for chronic disease patients during COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid systematic review. Digit. Health 2021, 7, 20552076211009396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zuppo, C.M. Defining ICT in a boundaryless world: The development of a working hierarchy. Int. J. Manag. Inf. Technol. 2012, 4, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardol, M.; de Jong, B.A.; van den Bos, G.A.; Beelen, A.; de Groot, I.J.; de Haan, R.J. Beyond disability: Perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin. Rehabil. 2002, 16, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO. Towards a common language for functioning, disability, and health. In ICF The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.Y.W. The severity and associated factors of participation restriction among community-dwelling frail older people: An application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO-ICF). BMC Geriatr. 2017, 17, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Seplaki, C.L.; Agree, E.M.; Weiss, C.O.; Szanton, S.L.; Bandeen-Roche, K.; Fried, L.P. Assistive devices in context: Cross-sectional association between challenges in the home environment and use of assistive devices for mobility. Gerontologist 2014, 54, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fjordside, S.; Morville, A. Factors influencing older people’s experiences of participation in autonomous decisions concerning their daily care in their own homes: A review of the literature. Int. J. Older People Nurs. 2016, 11, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Leeuwen, K.M.; Van Loon, M.S.; Van Nes, F.A.; Bosmans, J.E.; De Vet, H.C.; Ket, J.C.; Widdershoven, G.A.; Ostelo, R.W. What does quality of life mean to older adults? A thematic synthesis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Robinson, S.A.; Lachman, M.E. Perceived control and aging: A mini-review and directions for future research. Gerontology 2017, 63, 435–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Breitholtz, A.; Snellman, I.; Fagerberg, I. Living with uncertainty: Older persons’ lived experience of making independent decisions over time. Nurs. Res. Pract. 2013, 2013, 403717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McCormack, B.; McCance, T.V. Development of a framework for person-centred nursing. J. Adv. Nurs. 2006, 56, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- WHO. WHO Global Strategy on People-Centred and Integrated Health Services: Interim Report; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Davey, J. “Ageing in place”: The views of older homeowners on maintenance, renovation and adaptation. Soc. Policy J. N. Z. 2006, 27, 128. [Google Scholar]
- Genet, N.; Boerma, W.G.; Kringos, D.S.; Bouman, A.; Francke, A.L.; Fagerström, C.; Melchiorre, M.G.; Greco, C.; Devillé, W. Home care in Europe: A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2011, 11, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Egerton, T.; Brauer, S.G. Temporal characteristics of habitual physical activity periods among older adults. J. Phys. Act. Health 2009, 6, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djernes, J.K. Prevalence and predictors of depression in populations of elderly: A review. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2006, 113, 372–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spasova, S.; Baeten, R.; Vanhercke, B. Challenges in long-term care in Europe. Eurohealth 2018, 24, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
- Abdi, S.; Spann, A.; Borilovic, J.; de Witte, L.; Hawley, M. Understanding the care and support needs of older people: A scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF). BMC Geriatr. 2019, 19, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Broome, S.; Dellot, B.; Lindley, E.; Norris, E.; Rowson, J.; Soopramanien, D.; Truch, E. Improving decision-making in the care of older people: Exploring the decision ecology. Joseph Rowntree Found. 2012. Available online: https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/decision-making-care-support-full.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2021).
- Lindquist, L.A.; Muhammad, R.; Miller-Winder, A.P.; Opsasnick, L.; Kim, K.-Y.; Benavente, J.Y.; Wolf, M.; Ramirez-Zohfeld, V. Rationale and study design for decision making & implementation of aging-in-place/long term care plans among older adults. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 2021, 22, 100756. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Roy, N.; Dubé, R.; Després, C.; Freitas, A.; Légaré, F. Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0189266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lindquist, L.A.; Ramirez-Zohfeld, V.; Sunkara, P.; Forcucci, C.; Campbell, D.; Mitzen, P.; Cameron, K.A. Advanced life events (ALEs) that impede aging-in-place among seniors. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2016, 64, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elliott, J.; McNeil, H.; Ashbourne, J.; Huson, K.; Boscart, V.; Stolee, P. Engaging older adults in health care decision-making: A realist synthesis. Patient-Patient-Cent. Outcomes Res. 2016, 9, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Légaré, F.; Stacey, D.; Brière, N.; Robitaille, H.; Lord, M.-C.; Desroches, S.; Drolet, R. An interprofessional approach to shared decision making: An exploratory case study with family caregivers of one IP home care team. BMC Geriatr. 2014, 14, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dunér, A. and M. Nordström, The roles and functions of the informal support networks of older people who receive formal support: A Swedish qualitative study. Ageing Soc. 2007, 27, 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Turnpenny, A.; Beadle-Brown, J. Use of quality information in decision-making about health and social care services—A systematic review. Health Soc. Care Community 2015, 23, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Weert, J.C.; Van Munster, B.C.; Sanders, R.; Spijker, R.; Hooft, L.; Jansen, J. Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2016, 16, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Christophorou, C.; Kleanthous, S.; Georgiadis, D.; Cereghetti, D.M.; Andreou, P.; Wings, C.; Christodoulou, E.; Samaras, G. ICT services for active ageing and independent living: Identification and assessment. Healthc. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Santos, L.; Christophorou, C.; Christodoulou, E.; Samaras, G.; Dias, J. Development strategy of an architecture for e-health personalised service robots. IADIS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 2014, 9, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, A.K.; Stellefson, M.; Bernhardt, J.M. Healthy Aging 2.0: The potential of new media and technology. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2012, 9, 110241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blok, M.; van Ingen, E.; de Boer, A.H.; Slootman, M. The use of information and communication technologies by older people with cognitive impairments: From barriers to benefits. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 104, 106173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Wei, C.; Yao, N.; Yuan, A.; Shan, Y.; Yuan, C. Smartphone interventions for long-term health management of chronic diseases: An integrative review. Telemed. E-Health 2014, 20, 570–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez-Pérez, B.; de la Torre-Díez, I.; Candelas-Plasencia, S.; López-Coronado, M. Development and evaluation of tools for measuring the quality of experience (QoE) in mHealth applications. J. Med. Syst. 2013, 37, 9976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, N.; Hess, E.; Guo, G.; Sharp, A.; Huang, B.; Breslin, M.; Melnick, E. Tablet-based patient-centered decision support for minor head injury in the emergency department: Pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017, 5, e144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Llorente-Barroso, C.; Kolotouchkina, O.; Mañas-Viniegra, L. The Enabling Role of ICT to Mitigate the Negative Effects of Emotional and Social Loneliness of the Elderly during COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goodman-Casanova, J.M.; Dura-Perez, E.; Guzman-Parra, J.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.; Mayoral-Cleries, F. Telehealth home support during COVID-19 confinement for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia: Survey study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e19434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czaja, S.J. Can technology empower older adults to manage their health? Generations 2015, 39, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
- Powell, J.; Gunn, L.; Lowe, P.; Sheehan, B.; Griffiths, F.; Clarke, A. New networked technologies and carers of people with dementia: An interview study. Ageing Soc. 2010, 30, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karlsen, C.; Ludvigsen, M.S.; Moe, C.E.; Haraldstad, K.; Thygesen, E. Experiences of community-dwelling older adults with the use of telecare in home care services: A qualitative systematic review. JBI Evid. Synth. 2017, 15, 2913–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rampioni, M.; Moșoi, A.A.; Rossi, L.; Moraru, S.-A.; Rosenberg, D.; Stara, V. A Qualitative Study toward Technologies for Active and Healthy Aging: A Thematic Analysis of Perspectives among Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary End Users. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, K.; Chan, A.H. A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology 2011, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peek, S.T.; Luijkx, K.G.; Rijnaard, M.D.; Nieboer, M.E.; van der Voort, C.S.; Aarts, S.; van Hoof, J.; Vrijhoef, H.J.; Wouters, E.J. Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology 2016, 62, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hänninen, R.; Taipale, S.; Luostari, R. Exploring heterogeneous ICT use among older adults: The warm experts’ perspective. New Media Soc. 2021, 23, 1584–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levy, H.; Janke, A.T.; Langa, K.M. Health literacy and the digital divide among older Americans. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2015, 30, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Keränen, N.S.; Kangas, M.; Immonen, M.; Similä, H.; Enwald, H.; Korpelainen, R.; Jämsä, T. Use of information and communication technologies among older people with and without frailty: A population-based survey. J. Med Internet Res. 2017, 19, e5507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arksey, H.; O’Malley, L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2005, 8, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Levac, D.; Colquhoun, H.; O’Brien, K.K. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement. Sci. 2010, 5, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peters, M.D.; Marnie, C.; Tricco, A.C.; Pollock, D.; Munn, Z.; Alexander, L.; McInerney, P.; Godfrey, C.M.; Khalil, H. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020, 18, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Algilani, S.; Langius-Eklöf, A.; Kihlgren, A.; Blomberg, K. An interactive ICT platform for early assessment and management of patient-reported concerns among older adults living in ordinary housing—Development and feasibility. J. Clin. Nurs. 2017, 26, 1575–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Demiris, G.; Thompson, H.; Boquet, J.; Le, T.; Chaudhuri, S.; Chung, J. Older adults’ acceptance of a community-based telehealth wellness system. Inform. Health Soc. Care 2013, 38, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Demiris, G.; Thompson, H.J.; Reeder, B.; Wilamowska, K.; Zaslavsky, O. Using informatics to capture older adults’ wellness. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2013, 82, E232–E241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dupuy, L.; Consel, C.; Sauzéon, H. Self-determination-based design to achieve acceptance of assisted living technologies for older adults. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 65, 508–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Göransson, C.; Wengström, Y.; Ziegert, K.; Langius-Eklöf, A.; Blomberg, K. Self-care ability and sense of security among older persons when using an app as a tool for support. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2020, 34, 772–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Göransson, C.; Eriksson, I.; Ziegert, K.; Wengström, Y.; Langius-Eklöf, A.; Brovall, M.; Kihlgren, A.; Blomberg, K. Testing an app for reporting health concerns—Experiences from older people and home care nurses. Int. J. Older People Nurs. 2018, 13, e12181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrefors, C.; Axelsson, K.; Sävenstedt, S. Using assistive technology services at differing levels of care: Healthy older couples’ perceptions. J. Adv. Nurs. 2010, 66, 1523–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Irizarry, T.; Shoemake, J.; Nilsen, M.L.; Czaja, S.; Beach, S.; Dabbs, A.D. Patient portals as a tool for health care engagement: A mixed-method study of older adults with varying levels of health literacy and prior patient portal use. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017, 19, e99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Portz, J.D.; Bayliss, E.A.; Bull, S.; Boxer, R.S.; Bekelman, D.B.; Gleason, K.; Czaja, S. Using the technology acceptance model to explore user experience, intent to use, and use behavior of a patient portal among older adults with multiple chronic conditions: Descriptive qualitative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robben, S.H.; Perry, M.; Huisjes, M.; van Nieuwenhuijzen, L.; Schers, H.J.; van Weel, C.; Rikkert, M.G.O.; van Achterberg, T.; Heinen, M.M.; Melis, R.J. Implementation of an innovative web-based conference table for community-dwelling frail older people, their informal caregivers and professionals: A process evaluation. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2012, 12, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schmidt, S.; Behrens, J.; Lautenschlaeger, C.; Gaertner, B.; Luderer, C. Experiences with combined personal-online case management and the self-reliance of older people with multimorbidity living alone in private households: Results of an interpretative-hermeneutical analysis. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2019, 33, 931–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Willard, S.; Cremers, G.; Man, Y.P.; van Rossum, E.; Spreeuwenberg, M.; de Witte, L. Development and testing of an online community care platform for frail older adults in the Netherlands: A user-centred design. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Willard, S.; van Rossum, E.; Spreeuwenberg, M.; de Witte, L. A typology of online care platforms for community-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands: A scoping review. Gerontechnology 2019, 18, 122–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anderson, M.; Perrin, A. Technology use among seniors. In Tech Adoption Climbs among Older Adults; Pew Research Center: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Baxter, K.; Glendinning, C.; Clarke, S. Making informed choices in social care: The importance of accessible information. Health Soc. Care Community 2008, 16, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baxter, K.; Glendinning, C. Making choices about support services: Disabled adults’ and older people’s use of information. Health Soc. Care Community 2011, 19, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Czaja, S.J. Usability of technology for older adults: Where are we and where do we need to be. J. Usability Stud. 2019, 14, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
- Hunsaker, A.; Nguyen, M.H.; Fuchs, J.; Djukaric, T.; Hugentobler, L.; Hargittai, E. “He explained it to me and I also did it myself”: How older adults get support with their technology uses. Socius 2019, 5, 2378023119887866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leino-Kilpi, H.; Välimäki, M.; Dassen, T.; Gasull, M.; Lemonidou, C.; Schopp, A.; Scott, P.A.; Arndt, M.; Kaljonen, A. Perceptions of autonomy, privacy and informed consent in the care of elderly people in five European countries: General overview. Nurs. Ethics 2003, 10, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lyttle, D.J.; Ryan, A. Factors influencing older patients’ participation in care: A review of the literature. Int. J. Older People Nurs. 2010, 5, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suhonen, R.; Stolt, M.; Launis, V.; Leino-Kilpi, H. Research on ethics in nursing care for older people: A literature review. Nurs. Ethics 2010, 17, 337–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wildevuur, S.E.; Simonse, L.W. Information and communication technology–enabled person-centered care for the “big five” chronic conditions: Scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2015, 17, e3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vacek, P.; Rybenská, K. The most frequent difficulties encountered by senior citizens while using information and communication technology. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 217, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gil, A.; Moniz, A.; São, J.S. Technologies in Care for Older People—EPTA Report 2019; European Parliamentary Technology Assessment: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Baudin, K.; Gustafsson, C.; Frennert, S. Views of Swedish elder care personnel on ongoing digital transformation: Cross-sectional study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e15450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sturge, J.; Meijering, L.; Jones, C.A.; Garvelink, M.; Caron, D.; Nordin, S.; Elf, M.; Légaré, F. Technology to Improve Autonomy and Inform Housing Decisions for Older Adults With Memory Problems Who Live at Home in Canada, Sweden, and the Netherlands: Protocol for a Multipronged Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2021, 10, e19244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Neal, I.; du Toit, S.H.; Lovarini, M. The use of technology to promote meaningful engagement for adults with dementia in residential aged care: A scoping review. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2020, 32, 913–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Search Terms Group A | Search Terms Group B | Search Terms Group C |
---|---|---|
Information and communication technology | older people | decision making |
ICT | older adult | decision-making |
platform | older person | user participation |
internet | senior | user involvement |
online | elder * | user preference |
PCC Framework | Inclusion Criteria | Exclusion Criteria |
---|---|---|
Population | Older adults aged 65 or older | Focus on other perspectives than those of older adults themselves |
Concept | ICT for decision-making related to health, and health and social care services | Technical devices, such as sensors and alarms or robot technology |
Context | Home environment | Focus on institutional care, such as residential care facilities |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nordin, S.; Sturge, J.; Ayoub, M.; Jones, A.; McKee, K.; Dahlberg, L.; Meijering, L.; Elf, M. The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Older Adults’ Decision-Making Related to Health, and Health and Social Care Services in Daily Life—A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010151
Nordin S, Sturge J, Ayoub M, Jones A, McKee K, Dahlberg L, Meijering L, Elf M. The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Older Adults’ Decision-Making Related to Health, and Health and Social Care Services in Daily Life—A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(1):151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010151
Chicago/Turabian StyleNordin, Susanna, Jodi Sturge, Maria Ayoub, Allyson Jones, Kevin McKee, Lena Dahlberg, Louise Meijering, and Marie Elf. 2022. "The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Older Adults’ Decision-Making Related to Health, and Health and Social Care Services in Daily Life—A Scoping Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 1: 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010151
APA StyleNordin, S., Sturge, J., Ayoub, M., Jones, A., McKee, K., Dahlberg, L., Meijering, L., & Elf, M. (2022). The Role of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Older Adults’ Decision-Making Related to Health, and Health and Social Care Services in Daily Life—A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010151