Mother’s Own Milk Feeding in Preterm Newborns Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit or Special-Care Nursery: Obstacles, Interventions, Risk Calculation
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology & Pediatric Intensive Care, Saxonian Center for Feto/Neonatal Health, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(8), 4140; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084140
Submission received: 22 March 2021
/
Revised: 7 April 2021
/
Accepted: 8 April 2021
/
Published: 14 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimizing Nutrition and Dietary Pattern in Premature Infants)
Abstract
:Early nutrition of newborns significantly influences their long-term health. Mother’s own milk (MOM) feeding lowers the incidence of complications in preterm infants and improves long-term health. Unfortunately, prematurity raises barriers for the initiation of MOM feeding and its continuation. Mother and child are separated in most institutions, sucking and swallowing is immature, and respiratory support hinders breastfeeding. As part of a quality-improvement project, we review the published evidence on risk factors of sustained MOM feeding in preterm neonates. Modifiable factors such as timing of skin-to-skin contact, strategies of milk expression, and infant feeding or mode of delivery have been described. Other factors such as gestational age or neonatal complications are unmodifiable, but their recognition allows targeted interventions to improve MOM feeding. All preterm newborns below 34 weeks gestational age discharged over a two-year period from our large German level III neonatal center were reviewed to compare institutional data with the published evidence regarding MOM feeding at discharge from hospital. Based on local data, a risk score for non-MOM feeding can be calculated that helps to identify mother–baby dyads at risk of non-MOM feeding.
1. Introduction
Breast-milk feeding has significant advantages for infants. Premature infants receiving their mother’s own milk (MOM) have a lower incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis [1], sepsis [2], and retinopathy of prematurity than formula-fed preterm infants [3]. In the long term, MOM reduces the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia [4] and metabolic syndrome [5]. Despite suboptimal weight gain during their hospital stay, breastfed preterm infants had advantages in neurodevelopmental assessment at two and five years of age [6]. Breastfeeding is also advantageous for mothers: It reduces the risk of breast and ovarian cancer [7] and postpartum bleeding, and promotes uterine involution [8]. The costs for institutions to supply breast milk during hospitalization are relatively low in comparison to other healthcare-related costs [9].
Thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months [10].
Prematurity with hospitalization after birth, however, raises barriers for an adequate breast-milk utilization: Mother and child are separated to allow necessary medical treatment of the infant. Due to immaturity, sucking is poor, and expression of breast milk is necessary for several weeks before the infant can be breastfed. Several other risk factors decreasing the likelihood of MOM feeding at discharge from hospital have been described previously and will be reviewed subsequently. While some risk factors are modifiable by unit policies, many are not, since they are of a demographical nature. Nevertheless, both modifiable and unmodifiable risk factors are important to consider when targeted interventions are implemented for those mother–baby dyads, which are at the highest risk for NMOM (non-mother’s own milk; i.e., formula or donor milk) feeding at discharge.
During the last decades, the rate of breast-milk feeding has substantially increased in preterm infants. For example in France, breast-milk-feeding rates increased from 19% in 1997 [6] to 47% in 2011 [11], but the variability between units and countries is enormous, and suggests room for systematic improvements [12].
In-depth analyses of discharge feedings in German neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have rarely been published. As part of a quality-improvement project, we summarized published evidence and compared our local data regarding MOM feeding in preterm infants at discharge with the literature, and will present the results accordingly. MOM feeding is defined as exclusive breast-milk feeding during the last 48 h prior to discharge from hospital, either by breastfeeding or as extracted breast milk (EBM) by bottle. The odds ratios of influencing factors of MOM feeds were calculated. Additional information on statistics can be found in Appendix A.
In our institution, 368 preterm newborns below 34 weeks gestational age were discharged between 1 April, 2013 and 31 March, 2015 from the NICU or special-care nursery (SCN) of our level III neonatal center. Of those, 94% were inborn and 6% were admitted from a community hospital within 48 h after birth. Most newborns were admitted to the NICU initially (97.6%). Patients were born at 306/7 (283/7; 323/7) weeks and discharged at 360/7 (350/7; 370/7) weeks corrected gestational age.
It is hospital policy to encourage mothers to use electrical milk pumps, which are available in the hospital and are prescribed for use at home after the mother is discharged. Extracted breast milk is stored in a central hospital facility and thawed for each use. Hospital policies on preterm enteral feeding and breast-milk expression remained unchanged throughout the study period.
Extracted breast milk requires fortification to meet the nutritional needs of preterm infants. In our institution, fortification is initiated once the volume of enteral feeds reaches 120 mL/kg/day and is continued until discharge from hospital or due date.
A total of 60.1% of the patients were discharged on exclusive MOM feeds. This rate was higher than in the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study, which reported 25% of exclusive and 47% of some MOM feeds at discharge in infants below 32 weeks [11].
2. Modifiable Risk Factors for NMOM Feeding at Discharge
2.1. Skin-to-Skin Contact in the Delivery Room and the NICU
Skin-to-skin contact (SSC), or kangaroo care, describes placing the undressed newborn on the bare chest of one of the parents. SSC is an important component of family-centered care and is advised by the WHO, the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative, and other organizations. Positive effects of SSC have been described on the infant’s cardiovascular and respiratory stability, self-regulation, weight gain, etc. Confidence and bonding with the baby are benefits for the parents. Delayed or absent SSC has been described as a risk factor of NMOM feeding [11,13,14,15]. Notably in one study, longer daily hours of SSC were associated with earlier exclusive breastfeeding in preterm infants born at 28 to 34 weeks who spent a median daily duration of 7.5 h in SSC [13].
In our institution, SSC in the delivery room was not associated with MOM feeds at discharge, but SSC during the first week of life, outside of the delivery room, was (Table 1).
First, SSC in the NICU was initiated later in the NMOM group at 7 (4; 12) days of life than in the MOM group, where it was initiated at 5 (3; 10) days of life (p = 0.02).
2.2. Strategies of Infant Feeding and Milk Expression
Policies to support the initiation and maintenance of breast-milk feeding can increase the rates of MOM feeding at discharge [11]. Those policies might include information on breast-milk feeding given to moms admitted to the hospital for threatened preterm labor (nonsignificant effect) and the proposal of breast-milk expression within 6 h after birth (significant effect). Furthermore, policies for MOM-feeding maintenance include unit policies for human-milk or breast-milk feeding (significant effect) and a special room for mothers to pump their milk (nonsignificant effect) [11]. A delay of the first breast-milk expression for more than 48 h postpartum is an important risk factor for NMOM feeding [16].
The employment of professionals trained in human lactation (either according to the International Board Certified Lactation Consultant or French master training in human lactation) did not increase MOM feeding rates at discharge in the French EPIPAGE-2 study [11], although it increased breast-milk initiation [17]. In other studies, training of healthcare workers in hospitals did increase MOM feeding, even after discharge [18].
The use of nipple shields for breastfeeding is associated with less MOM feeding at discharge in preterm infants, and should therefore be critically appraised [16,19]. The motives for nipple-shield use in the extremely preterm infant were more often related to the infant than to the mother. The use for infants who fell asleep at the breast was especially associated with NMOM feeding at discharge. Only nipple shields for too-engorged breasts increased MOM feeding [19]. Minimizing the use of pacifiers lowered the odds of NMOM feeding as well [16].
In our institution, 74.7% of infants were breastfed at least once during their hospital stay. In infants <28 weeks gestational age, breastfeeding was initiated significantly later, at a corrected gestational age of 342/7 (323/7; 362/7) weeks, than in infants at or above 28 weeks, where it was initiated at 334/7 (325/7; 341/7) weeks (p = 0.047).
The rate of MOM feeds at discharge was significantly higher in infants who were breastfed at least once during their hospital stay (Table 2). In infants <28 weeks, 30/41 (73.2%) were on MOM at discharge if they were breastfed once, while only 6/36 (16.7%) of those never being breastfed received MOM, OR 13.64 (95% CI 4.47–41.63). Nipple shields are not routinely utilized in our unit, and their use is not recorded.
2.3. Mode of Delivery
The initiation of breastfeeding is hampered by a caesarean section in term newborns [20,21,22]. Planned C-sections are especially associated with breastfeeding cessation before 12 weeks postpartum [23]. Unfortunately, data from the preterm population is scarce.
In our institution, most preterm newborns are born via C-section. Vaginal delivery showed a trend toward more MOM feeding at discharge, but did not reach statistical significance (Table 3).
3. Unmodifiable Risk Factors for NMOM Feeding at Discharge
3.1. Demographical Risk Factors of the Infant
Prematurity itself and low birth weight are risk factors for NMOM feeding: Newborns <28 weeks are at an 2.9-times increased risk of exclusive breastfeeding failure at discharge [16]. In an Italian study, no human milk was fed to 45% of infants <1500 g birth weight, while only 23% of infants >2500 g received no human milk at discharge [20]. Data on multiple births is controversial, since some studies demonstrate an association with exclusive breastfeeding [21], while others show an association with NMOM feeds [16,22] or discontinuation of breastfeeding before six months of life [23].
In our institution, MOM feeds were significantly more common in infants of 28 weeks and above than in those below 28 weeks (Table 4): The rate of exclusive formula feeding decreased with higher gestational age at birth (Figure 1). Multiples were not at higher risk of NMOM feeds than singletons in our cohort. Birth weight was not associated with the likelihood of NMOM feeds.
3.2. Demographical Risk Factors of the Mother
Young maternal age is a risk factor for NMOM feeding at discharge. In preterm infants <34 weeks, each year of maternal age was associated with a 1.24-times increase of direct breastfeeding at hospital discharge [24]. Mothers <25 years of age ceased breastfeeding more often before discharge and before six months of age than mothers older than 25 years [23,25].
In studies in the U.S., marital status is often assessed. In term newborns, married women initiated and maintained breastfeeding longer than single mothers [26]. Conflicting results exist for preterm newborns <30 to 32 weeks. While in one study, unmarried women initiated breast-milk feeds more often, and more unmarried mothers provided breast milk until discharge [21], in another study infants from married mothers were often on MOM at discharge [27]. European studies rarely mention marital status, thus no data on European newborns is available.
Maternal socioeconomic status influences breast-milk feeding in term and preterm newborns: More mothers of lower educational level or on social welfare cease breastfeeding before discharge [22] or before six months of age [28] in European countries. Large regional differences in breastfeeding rates of preterm infants at discharge and at six months of age are common among European countries [23,25].
Breastfeeding experience in a previous offspring has protective effects on breastfeeding in the NICU: Mothers who did not breastfeed previous infants have 5.6-times higher odds to discontinue exclusive breastfeeding before discharge than those with at least four months of breastfeeding experience [16]. The support of the mother’s partner in supplying breast milk is promoting MOM feeding [27].
In our institution, maternal age, an academic degree, or parity was not associated with different rates of MOM feeding at discharge (Table 5).
3.3. Health and Disease-Related Risk Factors of the Infant
Infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) have significantly lower odds of being breastfed at discharge [25] and at six months of age [23]. The influence of other neonatal comorbidities has rarely been studied, although an effect of abdominal surgeries and other complications on MOM feeding seems possible. Severe morbidity, defined as culture-proven sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, or focal intestinal perforation, was not associated with NMOM feeds at discharge in newborns <1500 g, but length of stay on the NICU clearly was [29]. Severe morbidity, defined as retinopathy of prematurity, intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, and necrotizing enterocolitis, did not affect breastfeeding continuation in newborns below 32 weeks at six months of age [23].
In our institution, intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 2 or higher) and posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation did not affect MOM feeding at discharge. Infants with any kind of abdominal surgery were less likely to be discharged on MOM (Table 6).
3.4. Health and Disease-Related Risk Factors of the Mother
Mothers with nicotine abuse during pregnancy rarely give MOM feeds to their preterm infants at discharge (odds ratio of 0.43 (0.25–0.76) in a Danish study) [16,22,24]. Among women who stopped smoking for the pregnancy, those who relapsed to daily smoking postpartum were most likely to discontinue breastfeeding [30]. Recreational drug use has similar effects on direct breastfeeding of preterm infants [24].
Gestational diabetes decreases the odds for exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge in a study of mostly term newborns [31]. The underlying mechanisms were unclear, but delayed lactogenesis and the interference of early supplemental feeds with breastfeeding were discussed. Obesity can delay lactogenesis as well, and is associated with a shorter breastfeeding period. Lack of confidence and body comfort also shortened the duration of breastfeeding [32].
In our institution, the use of nicotine or recreational drugs was significantly associated with less likely MOM feeding at discharge. Gestational diabetes also was associated with fewer MOM feeds (Table 7).
3.5. Maternal Experiences with Milk Expression
The large majority of mothers of preterm children describe human-milk feeding as beneficial and important for their children, and they perceive supportive attitudes of hospital staff. Nevertheless, experiencing problems and barriers when pumping breast milk postpartum is a regular phenomenon for mothers of preterm children [33]. Infants of mothers who described difficulties in pumping breast milk or providing an adequate amount of breast milk for their child had a higher likelihood of receiving formula exclusively at discharge (OR 4.6, CI 1.5–13.9; and OR 3.6, CI 1.1–11.5, respectively) [33]. Achieving a volume of 500 mL per day of pumped breast milk by day 14 postpartum is a strong indicator of MOM feeding at discharge in newborns <1500 g (OR 9.7, CI 3.9–24.4) [34].
4. Identifying Mother–Baby Dyads at Risk of NMOM Feeding at Discharge
We aimed to identify parameters that allow an early prediction of the risk to be on NMOM at discharge. The risk score can be calculated at the end of the first week of life and includes three parameters: (I) gestational age below 28 weeks at birth, (II) no skin-to-skin care until the end of the first week of life, and (III) maternal use of alcohol or recreational drugs. One point is given for each parameter.
The percentage of MOM feeds at discharge in our cohort was 69.1% (0 points), 61.3% (1 point), 41.9% (2 points), and 12.5% (3 points) (Table 8). We suggest implementation of special measures to support families in continued MOM feeding if the risk score is 2 or higher, which applied to 82/368 newborns of our population (22.2%).
The risk score is easy to calculate, and all information required is available at the end of the first week of life. It is based on our local data set, and should be evaluated in another cohort of preterm newborns in the future. A mother–baby dyad with a low risk score might still benefit from breastfeeding support, but limited resources can be allocated to mothers at higher risk. Even in the lowest risk group, 30.9% of the preterm newborns were on NMOM at discharge.
5. Checklist for Quality-Improvement Projects to Increase MOM Feeding at Discharge
MOM feeding rates can be increased by regular quality assessment and implementation of policies. The following checklist might support divisional assessments:
- Is MOM feeding at discharge seen as an important outcome parameter?
- Is skin-to-skin care in the delivery room facilitated?
- Is skin-to-skin care in the NICU possible during the first days of life, especially in the first week of life?
- Is breast-milk expression started within 6 h after delivery?
- Do parents receive information on breastfeeding/breast-milk expression antenatally?
- Is the amount of pumped breast milk discussed at daily rounds?
- Are targeted interventions available for infants at risk, such as after abdominal surgery or below 28 weeks gestational age?
- Are targeted interventions available for mothers at risk, such as with nicotine use or gestational diabetes?
- Are targeted interventions available for mothers not achieving 500 mL per day of pumped breast milk at day 14 postpartum?
6. Conclusions
Mom’s own milk feeding is beneficial for preterm infants, but several modifiable and unmodifiable factors influence feeding at discharge from the NICU. Appraising unmodifiable risk factors allows care providers to initiate interventions to promote sustained MOM feeding on an individual basis. Modifiable risk factors can be targeted by institutional policies and should be reviewed accordingly.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization and methodology, L.M. and M.R.; investigation, L.M. and N.H.; resources, M.R.; data curation, L.M. and N.H.; writing—L.M.; writing—review and editing, L.M., M.R., V.H., and N.H.; visualization, L.M.; supervision, M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Dresden (EK 138032015).
Informed Consent Statement
Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective analysis of routine clinical data.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy reasons.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A. Statistics
The primary outcome was the nutrition during the last 48 h prior to discharge: Infants in the MOM group received their own mother’s breast milk exclusively. Neonates that received formula at least once in that timeframe were included in the non-MOM group (NMOM). We did not discriminate between breastfeeding and feeding extracted breast milk by bottle.
Data from a two-year period was collected from the electronic health records using Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, DC, USA), and statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 27.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad PRISM 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Categorical data is presented as absolute and relative frequency. Since data was not normally distributed, metrical data is presented as median (25th percentile; 75th percentile). Associations between parameters and the primary outcome were analyzed using logistic regression analysis, with 95% confidence intervals given.
References
- Schanler, R.J.; Shulman, R.J.; Lau, C. Feeding strategies for premature infants: Beneficial outcomes of feeding fortified human milk versus preterm formula. Pediatrics 1999, 103, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Furman, L.; Taylor, G.; Minich, N.; Hack, M. The effect of maternal milk on neonatal morbidity of very low-birth-weight infants. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2003, 157, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Manzoni, P.; Stolfi, I.; Pedicino, R.; Vagnarelli, F.; Mosca, F.; Pugni, L.; Bollani, L.; Pozzi, M.; Gomez, K.; Tzialla, C.; et al. Human milk feeding prevents retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm VLBW neonates. Early Hum. Dev. 2013, 89, S64–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spiegler, J.; Preuß, M.; Gebauer, C.; Bendiks, M.; Herting, E.; Göpel, W.; Berghäuser, M.A.; Böckenholt, K.; Bohnhorst, B.; Böttger, R.; et al. Does Breastmilk Influence the Development of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia? J. Pediatr. 2016, 169, 76–80.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schanler, R.J. Outcomes of Human Milk-Fed Premature Infants. Semin. Perinatol. 2011, 35, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rozé, J.C.; Darmaun, D.; Boquien, C.Y.; Flamant, C.; Picaud, J.C.; Savagner, C.; Claris, O.; Lapillonne, A.; Mitanchez, D.; Branger, B.; et al. The apparent breastfeeding paradox in very preterm infants: Relationship between breast feeding, early weight gain and neurodevelopment based on results from two cohorts, EPIPAGE and LIFT. BMJ Open 2012, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, R.; Sinha, B.; Sankar, M.J.; Taneja, S.; Bhandari, N.; Rollins, N.; Bahl, R.; Martines, J. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. Int. J. Paediatr. 2015, 104, 96–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chua, S.; Arulkumaran, S.; Lim, I.; Selamat, N.; Ratnam, S.S. Influence of breastfeeding and nipple stimulation on postpartum uterine activity. BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1994, 101, 804–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, T.J.; Patel, A.L.; Bigger, H.R.; Engstrom, J.L.; Meier, P.P. Economic Benefits and Costs of Human Milk Feedings: A Strategy to Reduce the Risk of Prematurity-Related Morbidities in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants. Adv. Nutr. 2014, 5, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eidelman, A.I.; Schanler, R.J. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2012, 129, e827–e841. [Google Scholar]
- Mitha, A.; Piedvache, A.; Glorieux, I.; Zeitlin, J.; Roué, J.M.; Blondel, B.; Durox, M.; Burguet, A.; Kaminski, M.; Ancel, P.Y.; et al. Unit policies and breast milk feeding at discharge of very preterm infants: The EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2019, 33, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, E.; Edstedt Bonamy, A.-K.; Bonet, M.; Toome, L.; Rodrigues, C.; Howell, E.A.; Cuttini, M.; Zeitlin, J. Room for improvement in breast milk feeding after very preterm birth in Europe: Results from the EPICE cohort. Matern. Child Nutr. 2018, 14, e12485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oras, P.; Thernström Blomqvist, Y.; Hedberg Nyqvist, K.; Gradin, M.; Rubertsson, C.; Hellström-Westas, L.; Funkquist, E.L. Skin-to-skin contact is associated with earlier breastfeeding attainment in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. Int. J. Paediatr. 2016, 105, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tully, K.P.; Holditch-Davis, D.; White-Traut, R.C.; David, R.; O’Shea, T.M.; Geraldo, V. A Test of Kangaroo Care on Preterm Infant Breastfeeding. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. JOGNN 2016, 45, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mekonnen, A.G.; Yehualashet, S.S.; Bayleyegn, A.D. The effects of kangaroo mother care on the time to breastfeeding initiation among preterm and LBW infants: A meta-analysis of published studies. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2019, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maastrup, R.; Hansen, B.M.; Kronborg, H.; Bojesen, S.N.; Hallum, K.; Frandsen, A.; Kyhnaeb, A.; Svarer, I.; Hallström, I. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding of preterm infants. Results from a prospective national cohort study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pierrat, V.; Coquelin, A.; Cuttini, M.; Khoshnood, B.; Glorieux, I.; Claris, O.; Durox, M.; Kaminski, M.; Ancel, P.-Y.; Arnaud, C. Translating Neurodevelopmental Care Policies into Practice. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 17, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kramer, M.S.; Chalmers, B.; Hodnett, E.D.; Sevkovskaya, Z.; Dzikovich, I.; Shapiro, S.; Collet, J.P.; Vanilovich, I.; Mezen, I.; Ducruet, T.; et al. Promotion of breastfeeding intervation trial (PROBIT): A randomized trial in the Republic of Belarus. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2001, 285, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maastrup, R.; Walloee, S.; Kronborg, H. Nipple shield use in preterm infants: Prevalence, motives for use and association with exclusive breastfeeding—Results from a national cohort study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Davanzo, R.; Monasta, L.; Ronfani, L.; Brovedani, P.; Demarini, S. Breastfeeding at NICU Discharge. J. Hum. Lact. 2013, 29, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pineda, R.G. Predictors of Breastfeeding and Breastmilk Feeding Among Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Breastfeed. Med. 2011, 6, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zachariassen, G.; Faerk, J.; Grytter, C.; Esberg, B.; Juvonen, P.; Halken, S. Factors associated with successful establishment of breastfeeding in very preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2010, 99, 1000–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bonnet, C.; Blondel, B.; Piedvache, A.; Wilson, E.; Bonamy, A.K.E.; Gortner, L.; Rodrigues, C.; van Heijst, A.; Draper, E.S.; Cuttini, M.; et al. Low breastfeeding continuation to 6 months for very preterm infants: A European multiregional cohort study. Matern. Child Nutr. 2019, 15, e12657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casey, L.; Fucile, S.; Dow, K.E. Determinants of Successful Direct Breastfeeding at Hospital Discharge in High-Risk Premature Infants. Breastfeed. Med. 2018, 13, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bonet, M.; Blondel, B.; Agostino, R.; Combier, E.; Maier, R.F.; Cuttini, M.; Khoshnood, B.; Zeitlin, J. Variations in breastfeeding rates for very preterm infants between regions and neonatal units in Europe: Results from the MOSAIC cohort. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011, 96, F450–F452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Darfour-Oduro, S.A.; Kim, J. WIC Mothers’ Social Environment and Postpartum Health on Breastfeeding Initiation and Duration. Breastfeed. Med. 2014, 9, 524–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lussier, M.M.; Tosi, L.; Brownell, E.A. Predictors of Mother’s Own Milk Feeding at Discharge in Preterm Infants. Adv. Neonatal Care 2019, 19, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flacking, R.; Nyqvist, K.H.; Ewald, U. Effects of socioeconomic status on breastfeeding duration in mothers of preterm and term infants. Eur. J. Public Health 2007, 17, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirchner, L.; Jeitler, V.; Waldhör, T.; Pollak, A.; Wald, M. Long hospitalization is the most important risk factor for early weaning from breast milk in premature babies. Acta Paediatr. 2009, 98, 981–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratner, P.A.; Johnson, J.L.; Bottorff, J.L. Smoking Relapse and Early Weaning Among Postpartum Women: Is There an Association? Birth 1999, 26, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haile, Z.T.; Oza-Frank, R.; Azulay Chertok, I.R.; Passen, N. Association between History of Gestational Diabetes and Exclusive Breastfeeding at Hospital Discharge. J. Hum. Lact. 2016, 32, NP36–NP43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hauff, L.E.; Demerath, E.W. Body image concerns and reduced breastfeeding duration in primiparous overweight and obese women. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2012, 24, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gianni, M.L.; Bezze, E.N.; Sannino, P.; Baro, M.; Roggero, P.; Muscolo, S.; Plevani, L.; Mosca, F. Maternal views on facilitators of and barriers to breastfeeding preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2018, 18, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoban, R.; Bigger, H.; Schoeny, M.; Engstrom, J.; Meier, P.; Patel, A.L. Milk Volume at 2 Weeks Predicts Mother’s Own Milk Feeding at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge for Very Low Birthweight Infants. Breastfeed. Med. 2018, 13, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Feeding at discharge. Significantly more infants of 28 weeks gestational age and above are fed MOM at discharge than below 28 weeks.
Figure 1.
Feeding at discharge. Significantly more infants of 28 weeks gestational age and above are fed MOM at discharge than below 28 weeks.
Table 1.
SSC (Skin-to-skin contact) and MOM (Mother’s own milk) feeding at discharge.
| Modifying Factor | MOM Feeding at Discharge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | N (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
| SSC in the delivery room | |||
| No | 267 | 160 (60.0) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Yes | 54 | 38 (70.4) | 1.59 (0.84–2.99) |
| SSC in the first week of life | |||
| No | 169 | 90 (53.3) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Yes | 199 | 133 (65.8) | 1.69 (1.11–2.58) |
Table 2.
Breastfeeding and MOM feeding at discharge.
| Modifying Factor | MOM Feeding at Discharge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | N (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Breastfeeding at least once during hospital stay | |||
| No | 92 | 26 (28.3) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Yes | 275 | 195 (70.9) | 6.19 (3.67–10.44) |
Table 3.
Mode of delivery and MOM feeding at discharge.
| Modifying Factor | MOM Feeding at Discharge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | N (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Mode of delivery | |||
| Vaginal delivery | 56 | 40 (71.4) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| C-section | 312 | 181 (58.0) | 0.55 (0.30–1.03) |
Table 4.
Infant characteristics and MOM feeding at discharge.
| Modifying Factor | MOM Feeding at Discharge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | N (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Gestational age at birth | |||
| ≥28 weeks | 290 | 185 (63.8) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| <28 weeks | 78 | 36 (46.2) | 0.49 (0.29–0.81) |
| Multiples | |||
| No | 253 | 150 (59.3) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Yes | 115 | 71 (61.7) | 1.11 (0.71–1.74) |
Table 5.
Maternal demographics and MOM feeding at discharge.
| Modifying Factor | MOM Feeding at Discharge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | N (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Maternal age | |||
| ≥25 years | 333 | 205 (61.6) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| <25 years | 35 | 16 (45.7) | 0.53 (0.26–1.06) |
| Professional education | |||
| No academic degree | 263 | 159 (60.5) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Academic degree | 51 | 36 (70.6) | 1.57 (0.82–3.01) |
| Parity | |||
| Primipara | 222 | 135 (60.8) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Multipara | 146 | 86 (58.9) | 0.92 (0.60–1.41) |
Table 6.
Infant morbidities and MOM feeding at discharge.
| Modifying Factor | MOM Feeding at Discharge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | N (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage, grade 2 or higher | |||
| No | 345 | 211 (61.2) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Yes | 22 | 9 (40.9) | 0.44 (0.18–1.06) |
| Posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation | |||
| No | 354 | 214 (60.5) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Yes | 14 | 7 (50.0%) | 0.65 (0.22–1.91) |
| Abdominal surgery | |||
| No | 349 | 214 (61.3) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Yes | 19 | 7 (36.8%) | 0.37 (0.14–0.96) |
Table 7.
Maternal morbidities and MOM feeding at discharge.
| Modifying Factor | MOM Feeding at Discharge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | N (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Nicotine or recreational drug use | |||
| No | 332 | 214 (64.4) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Yes | 36 | 7 (19.4) | 0.13 (0.06–0.31) |
| Gestational diabetes | |||
| No | 331 | 205 (61.9) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Yes | 37 | 16 (43.2) | 0.47 (0.24–0.93) |
Table 8.
Risk score and MOM feeding at discharge.
| MOM Feeding at Discharge | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | N (%) | OR (95% CI) | |
| MOM feeding risk score | |||
| 0 | 175 | 121 (69.1) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| 1 | 111 | 68 (61.3) | 0.71 (0.43–1.16) |
| 2 | 74 | 31 (41.9) | 0.32 (0.18–0.57) |
| 3 | 8 | 1 (12.5) | 0.06 (0.01–0.53) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Heller, N.; Rüdiger, M.; Hoffmeister, V.; Mense, L. Mother’s Own Milk Feeding in Preterm Newborns Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit or Special-Care Nursery: Obstacles, Interventions, Risk Calculation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084140
AMA Style
Heller N, Rüdiger M, Hoffmeister V, Mense L. Mother’s Own Milk Feeding in Preterm Newborns Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit or Special-Care Nursery: Obstacles, Interventions, Risk Calculation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(8):4140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084140
Chicago/Turabian StyleHeller, Nadja, Mario Rüdiger, Vanessa Hoffmeister, and Lars Mense. 2021. "Mother’s Own Milk Feeding in Preterm Newborns Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit or Special-Care Nursery: Obstacles, Interventions, Risk Calculation" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 8: 4140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084140
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
