Next Article in Journal
Assessing Differences in the Implementation of Smoke-Free Contracts—A Cross-Sectional Analysis from the School Randomized Controlled Trial X:IT
Previous Article in Journal
Serum Free Amino Acid Profiling in Differential Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors—A Comparative Study with Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Challenges of Spa Tourism in Andalusia: Experts’ Proposed Solutions
Open AccessArticle

Investigation of Radiation Safety Pictogram Recognition in Daily Life

by 1 and 2,*
1
Radiological Science/Research Institute of Health Statistics, Jeonju University, Jeonju-si 55069, Korea
2
Department of Fashion Business, Jeonju University, Jeonju-si 55069, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Sunghyup Sean Hyun
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 2166; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042166
Received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 1 February 2021 / Accepted: 19 February 2021 / Published: 23 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Tourism/Hospitality and Well-being)
After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident of 2011, interest regarding radiation safety in everyday life has increased considerably. This study investigates the general public’s current level of awareness of six warning pictograms in regard to medical and natural radiation safety utilized under ISO 7010, as per Korea industrial regulations. Namely, it tests whether survey respondents can recognize pictograms related to radiation safety according to their purpose, as their inability to do so poses a serious safety problem. The empirical analysis results regarding the awareness levels for radiation safety pictograms are as follows. First, 63.3% of the respondents were unable to correctly identify the pictograms; that is, their level of understandings of the six pictograms related to everyday radiation were low. Second, the mean score for the correct responses to the question of what the six pictograms indicated in relation to everyday radiation safety was also relatively low, with a mean score of 2.79 and a standard deviation of 1.447. The primary reasons for the low awareness and understanding levels were identified to be insufficient education related to radiation safety in schools. Additionally, it is necessary to revise and rectify current warning pictograms established by the Korea Industrial Standards and ISO 7010. This study is thus significant in that it identifies the level of understanding of the pictograms and suggests the need for improvement as a diversified effort toward improving everyday radiation safety. View Full-Text
Keywords: radiation safety; pictograms; natural radiation; medical radiation; mean comparison radiation safety; pictograms; natural radiation; medical radiation; mean comparison
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, K.; Choi, J. Investigation of Radiation Safety Pictogram Recognition in Daily Life. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042166

AMA Style

Choi K, Choi J. Investigation of Radiation Safety Pictogram Recognition in Daily Life. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(4):2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042166

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Kyoungho; Choi, Jinhee. 2021. "Investigation of Radiation Safety Pictogram Recognition in Daily Life" Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, no. 4: 2166. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042166

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop