Validation of a Self-Perceived Adaptive Behaviors Scale in Older Chilean Women and Percentiles for Evaluation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
2.1. Type of Study and Sample
2.2. Procedures
2.3. Validity and Reliability of the Scale
2.4. Statistics
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Oakland, T.; Algina, J. Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-II Parent/Primary Caregiver Form: Ages 0–5: Its Factor Structure and Other Implications for Practice. J. Appl. Sch. Psychol. 2011, 27, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossman, H. Manual on Terminology and Classification in Mental Retardation; American Association on Mental Deficiency: Washington, DC, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; p. 5. [Google Scholar]
- Kort, Y.A.W.S.-D.; Midden, C.J.H.; Aarts, H.H.; Van Wagenberg, F. Determinants of Adaptive Behavior among Older Persons: Self-Efficacy, Importance, and Personal Dispositions as Directive Mechanisms. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 2001, 53, 253–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ditterline, J.; Banner, D.; Oakland, T.; Becton, D. Adaptive Behavior Profiles of Students with Disabilities. J. Appl. Sch. Psychol. 2008, 24, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, J.A.; Morris, Z.A.; Costello, S. The Application of Adaptive Behaviour Models: A Systematic Review. Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schalock, R.L.; Borthwick-Duffy, S.A.; Bradley, V.J.; Buntinx, W.H.E.; Coulter, D.L.; Craig, E.M.; Gomez, S.; Lachapelle, Y.; Luckasson, R.; Reeve, A.; et al. Intellectual Disability: Diagnosis, Classification, and Systems of Supports, 11th ed.; American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Takata, Y.; Ansai, T.; Soh, I.; Awano, S.; Nakamichi, I.; Akifusa, S.; Goto, K.; Yoshida, A.; Fujii, H.; Fujisawa, R.; et al. High-level activities of daily living and disease-specific mortality during a 12-year follow-up of an octogenarian population. Clin. Interv. Aging 2013, 8, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Msall, M.E.; Tremont, M.R. Measuring functional outcomes after prematurity: Developmental impact of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight status on childhood disability. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2002, 8, 258–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ottenbacher, K.J.; Msall, M.E.; Lyon, N.; Duffy, L.C.; Ziviani, J.; Granger, C.V.; Braun, S. Functional Assessment and Care of Children with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000, 79, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.C.; Heinemann, A.W.; Bode, R.K.; Granger, C.V.; Mallinson, T. Impact of Pediatric Rehabilitation Services on Children’s Functional Outcomes. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2004, 58, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Widaman, K.F.; Stacy, A.W.; Borthwick-Duffy, S.A. Construct validity of dimensions of adaptive behavior: A multitrait-multimethod evaluation. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 1993, 98, 219–234. [Google Scholar]
- Brigidi, B.D.; Achenbach, T.M.; Dumenci, L.; Newhouse, P.A. Broad spectrum assessment of psychopathology and adaptive functioning with the Older Adult Behavior Checklist: A validation and diagnostic discrimination study. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2010, 25, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poon, L.W.; Martin, P.; Bishop, A.; Cho, J.; Da Rosa, G.; Deshpande, N.; Hensley, R.; Macdonald, M.; Margrett, J.; Randall, G.K.; et al. Understanding Centenarians’ Psychosocial Dynamics and Their Contributions to Health and Quality of Life. Curr. Gerontol. Geriatr. Res. 2010, 2010, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wheeler, H.E.; Kim, S.K. Genetics and genomics of human ageing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 366, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Freund, A.M. Successful Aging as Management of Resources: The Role of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation. Res. Hum. Dev. 2008, 5, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kahana, E.; Kahana, B.; Lee, J.E. Proactive Approaches to Successful Aging: One Clear Path through the Forest. Gerontology 2014, 60, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Carpentieri, J.D.; Elliott, J.; Brett, C.E.; Deary, I.J. Adapting to Aging: Older People Talk About Their Use of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation to Maximize Well-being in the Context of Physical Decline. J. Gerontol. Ser. B 2017, 72, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Alvarez, J.-A.; Aburto, J.M.; Canudas-Romo, V. Latin American convergence and divergence towards the mortality profiles of developed countries. Popul. Stud. 2019, 74, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dintrans, P.V. Envejecimiento y cuidados a largo plazo en Chile: Desafíos en el contexto de la OCDE. Rev. Panam. Salud Pública 2017, 41, 86. [Google Scholar]
- Bunout, D.; Osorio, P.; Barrera, G.; Torrejón, M.J.; Meersohn, C.; Anigstein, M.S.; Miranda, J.P.; Espinoza, I.; Hirsch, S.; Maza, M.P. Quality of life of older Chilean people living in metropolitan Santiago, Chile: Influence of socioeconomic status. Ageing Res. 2011, 3, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). Growing Older: Adding Life to Years. Annual Report on the State of Public Health in Canada. 2010. Available online: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cphorsphc-respcacsp/2010/fr-rc/index-eng.php (accessed on 8 August 2017).
- Preacher, K.J.; Maccallum, R.C. Repairing Tom Swift’s Electric Factor Analysis Machine. Underst. Stat. 2003, 2, 13–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cossio-Bolaños, M.; Vasquez, P.; Luarte-Rocha, C.; Sulla-Torres, J.; Gómez Campos, R. Evaluación de la autopercepción de la aptitud física y propuesta de normativas en adolescentes escolares chilenos: Estudio EAPAF. Arch. Argent. Pediatría 2016, 114, 319–328. [Google Scholar]
- Gómez-Campos, R.; Benavides, G.B.; Luarte-Rocha, C.; Figueroa, E.N.T.; Albornoz, C.U.; Sulla-Torres, J.; Cossiobolanos, M.A. Validación y propuesta normativa para la valoración de la preocupación por la alimentación de adolescentes chilenos: Estudio EPACH. Nutr. Hosp. 2016, 33, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). International Standards for Anthropometic Assessment; ISAK: Underdale, SA, Australia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Wiersema, L.D. Conceptualization and development of the sources of enjoyment in youth sport questionnaire. Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci. 2001, 5, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merino, C.; Livia, J. Intervalos de confianza asimétricos para el índice de validez de contenido: Un programa Visual Basic para la V de Aiken. An. Psicol. 2009, 25, 169–171. [Google Scholar]
- Escurra, M. Cuantificación de la validez de contenido por criterio de jueces. Rev. Psicol. 1989, 6, 103–111. [Google Scholar]
- Bulger, S.M.; Hourner, L.D. Modified elphi investigation of exercise science in physical education teacher education. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2007, 26, 57–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bollen, K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables, 1st ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Guttman, L. Fundamentos del análisis del escalograma. In Wainerman CH (Comp), Escalas de Medición en Ciencias Sociales; Nueva Visión: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1976; pp. 291–330. [Google Scholar]
- Penfield, R.D.; Giacobbi, P.R., Jr. Applying a score confidence interval to Aiken’s item contentrelevance index. Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci. 2004, 8, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, T.J.; Bellizzi, M.C.; Flegal, K.M.; Dietz, W.H. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ 2000, 320, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Siembida, E.J.; Moss, K.; Kadan-Lottick, N.S.; Bellizzi, K.M. The Patient—Provider Relationship in Adolescent Oncology: AnExploratory Factor Analysis of a Thirteen-Item Self-Report Measure. J. Adolesc. Health 2018, 63, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.; Anderson, R.; Tatham, R.; Black, W. Multivariate Data Analysis; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- García, M.A.; García, M. Estimación de la validez de contenido en una escala de valoración de grado de violencia de género soportado en adolescentes. Acción Psicológica 2013, 10, 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bolivar-Paredes, E.; Villanueva-Ruska, A. Validación y confiabilidad del Cuestionario AQ- 27 de actitudes estigmatizadoras hacia pacientes con esquizofrenia en un Hospital General—2015. Rev. Neuro Psiquiatr. 2017, 80, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin-Romera, A.; Molina Ruiz, E. Valor del conocimiento pedagógico para la docencia en Educación Secundaria: Diseño y validación de un cuestionario. Estud. Pedagógicos 2017, 43, 195–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kane, M.T. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. In The Concept of Validity; Lissitz, E.R.W., Ed.; Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2009; pp. 39–64. [Google Scholar]
- Freiberg, H.A.; Stover, J.B.; de la Iglesia, G.; Fernández, L.M. Polychoric and Tetrachoric Correlations in Exploratory and Confirmatory Factorial Studies. Prensa Médica Latinoam. Cienc. Psicológicas 2013, 7, 151–164. [Google Scholar]
- Dumitrescu, L.; Tichindelean, M.; Vinerean, S. Using Factor Analysis in Relationship Marketing. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2013, 6, 466–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cova, F.; Bustos, C.; Rincón, P.; Grandón, P.; Saldivia, S.; Inostroza, C. Inventario de Conductas Infantiles en preescolares: Propiedades psicométricas del Inventario de Conductas Infantiles (CBCL/1.5-5) y del Informe del Cuidador/Educador (C-TRF) en Preescolares Chilenos. Ter. Psicológica 2016, 34, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Castro, L.; Vallejos, V.; Casas, J.-A.; Ecerda, G.; Sánchez, S.; Zúñiga, D. Adaptación de la Escala Integral de Calidad de Vida en personas con discapacidad intelectual y del desarrollo en población chilena. Ter. Psicológica 2017, 35, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Díaz, E.M.; Dinamarca, D.; Mendoza-Llanos, R.; Palomo-Vélez, G. Escala de Felicidad para Adultos (EFPA). Ter. Psicológica 2018, 36, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conde, W.L.; Monteiro, C.A. Body mass index cutoff points for evaluation of nutritional status in Brazilian children and adolescents. J. Pediatr. 2006, 82, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reschly, D.J. Assessing mild mental retardation: The influence of adaptive behavior, sociocultural status, and prospects for nonbiased assessment. In The Handbook of School Psychology; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1982; pp. 209–242. [Google Scholar]
- Garmendia, M.L. Análisis factorial: Una aplicación en el cuestionario de salud general de Goldberg, versión de 12 preguntas. Rev. Chil. Salud Pública 2010, 11, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Mean | SD | Mínimum | Maximum |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 70.8 | 5.9 | 60.2 | 88.8 |
Anthropometry | ||||
Weight (kg) | 67.9 | 10.6 | 40.0 | 98.4 |
Height (cm) | 152.3 | 5.5 | 135.0 | 170.0 |
Adiposity Indicators | ||||
C. Neck (cm) | 35.5 | 3.9 | 27.8 | 74.0 |
C. Waist (cm) | 91.9 | 10.7 | 59.0 | 120.0 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 29.1 | 4.4 | 14.9 | 43.7 |
ABSOW-I (EACAM-I) | Median | Range | Mínimum | Maximum |
D. Communication | 14.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 15.0 |
D. Resource use | 15.0 | 11.0 | 8.0 | 19.0 |
D. Home life | 15.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 15.0 |
D. Health | 14.0 | 11.0 | 8.0 | 19.0 |
D. Safety | 16.0 | 35.0 | 10.0 | 45.0 |
D. Self-care | 16.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 | 18.0 |
D. Functional Skills | 17.0 | 12.0 | 9.0 | 21.0 |
D. Leisure | 14.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 18.0 |
D. Self-direction | 19.0 | 12.0 | 9.0 | 21.0 |
D. Socialization | 17.0 | 9.0 | 10.0 | 19.0 |
D. Functional Capactiy | 15.0 | 8.0 | 10.0 | 18.0 |
Total ABSOW-I (EACAM-I) | 169.0 | 76.0 | 134.0 | 210.0 |
° | RP | RE | DI | CL | SI | CO | T | N° | RP | RE | DI | CL | SI | CO | T | N° | RP | RE | DI | CL | SI | CO | T |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comunication | Safety | Leisure | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 22 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 41 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
2 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 23 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 42 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.85 |
3 | 0.79 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 24 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 43 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.89 |
4 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.75 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 25 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 44 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.79 |
5 | 0.93 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 26 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 45 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.90 |
T | 0.90 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.87 | T | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 46 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.89 |
T | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.86 | ||||||||||||||||
Use of recreational spaces | Self-care | Self-direction | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 27 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 47 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.81 |
7 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 28 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 48 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.87 |
8 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 29 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.92 | 49 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
9 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 30 | 0.86 | 0.82 | .86 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 50 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.89 |
10 | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 31 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 51 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 |
11 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 32 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 52 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 |
T | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 33 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.88 | T | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 |
T | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.87 | ||||||||||||||||
Home life | Functional skills | Socialization | |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 34 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 53 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0,87 |
13 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 0.90 | 35 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 54 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
14 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 36 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 55 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.93 | 0.88 |
15 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0,86 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 37 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 56 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.82 | 0.88 |
16 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 38 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 57 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.86 |
T | 0.91 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 39 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 0.86 | T | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.87 |
40 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.90 | ||||||||||||||||
T | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.87 | ||||||||||||||||
Health | Functional capacity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 58 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0,85 | ||||||||
18 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 59 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0,87 | ||||||||
19 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 60 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0,86 | ||||||||
20 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 61 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 0,89 | ||||||||
21 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 62 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0,89 | ||||||||
T | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.85 | T | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
Dimensions/Factor | S | C | R | Dimensions/Factor | S | C | R | Dimensions/Factor | S | C | R | Dimensions/Factor | S | C | R |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comunication | Health | Functional skills | Socialization | ||||||||||||
1 | 0.66 | 0.511 | 0.829 | 17 | 0.68 | 0.383 | 0.828 | 34 | 0.68 | 0.398 | 0.83 | 53 | 0.68 | 0.524 | 0.83 |
2 | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.829 | 18 | 0.76 | 0.472 | 0.832 | 35 | 0.63 | 0.419 | 0.827 | 54 | 0.68 | 0.512 | 0.828 |
3 | 0.71 | 0.572 | 0.829 | 19 | 0.85 | 0.405 | 0.831 | 36 | 0.74 | 0.587 | 0.824 | 55 | 0.73 | 0.543 | 0.828 |
4 | 0.62 | 0.495 | 0.828 | 20 | 0.71 | 0.389 | 0.829 | 37 | 0.72 | 0.557 | 0.828 | 56 | 0.66 | 0.398 | 0.829 |
5 | 0.68 | 0.457 | 0.826 | 21 | 0.81 | 0.459 | 0.831 | 38 | 0.73 | 0.542 | 0.825 | 57 | 0.66 | 0.412 | 0.828 |
PV | 6.8 | PV | 2.26 | 39 | 0.73 | 0.494 | 0.822 | PV | 1.62 | ||||||
%V | 10.98 | %V | 3.64 | 40 | 0.71 | 0.52 | 0.828 | %V | 2.51 | ||||||
% cumulative | 10.98 | % cumulative | 24.66 | PV | 1.9 | % cumulative | 43.57 | ||||||||
Reliability total | 0.710 | Reliability total | 0.724 | %V | 3.5 | Reliability total | 0.717 | ||||||||
% cumulative | 35.56 | ||||||||||||||
Reliability total | 0.744 | ||||||||||||||
Use of recreational spaces | Safety | Leisure | Functional capacity | ||||||||||||
6 | 0.73 | 0.597 | 0.829 | 22 | 0.72 | 0.52 | 0.83 | 41 | 0.75 | 0.424 | 0.828 | 58 | 0.75 | 0.52 | 0.825 |
7 | 0.69 | 0.51 | 0.827 | 23 | 0.6 | 0.419 | 0.827 | 42 | 0.72 | 0.417 | 0.825 | 59 | 0.77 | 0.47 | 0.827 |
8 | 0.69 | 0.498 | 0.826 | 24 | 0.74 | 0.47 | 0.833 | 43 | 0.73 | 0.377 | 0.825 | 60 | 0.72 | 0.434 | 0.827 |
9 | 0.79 | 0.578 | 0.827 | 25 | 0.71 | 0.343 | 0.831 | 44 | 0.7 | 0.389 | 0.825 | 61 | 0.76 | 0.387 | 0.83 |
10 | 0.74 | 0.472 | 0.829 | 26 | 0.72 | 0.356 | 0.855 | 45 | 0.69 | 0.459 | 0.829 | 62 | 0.75 | 0.472 | 0.831 |
11 | 0.77 | 0.424 | 0.829 | PV | 2.23 | 46 | 0.66 | 0.389 | 0.828 | PV | 1.56 | ||||
PV | 3.67 | %V | 3.6 | PV | 1.82 | %V | 2.70 | ||||||||
%V | 5.93 | % cumulative | 28.26 | %V | 2.9 | % cumulative | 46.27 | ||||||||
% cumulative | 16.91 | Reliability total | 0.712 | % cumulative | 38.46 | Reliability total | 0.717 | ||||||||
Reliability total | 0.763 | Reliability total | 0.806 | ||||||||||||
Home life | Self-care | Self-direction | |||||||||||||
12 | 0.75 | 0.53 | 0.829 | 27 | 0.74 | 0.48 | 0.832 | 47 | 0.74 | 0.419 | 0.828 | ||||
13 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 0.829 | 28 | 0.7 | 0.382 | 0.829 | 48 | 0.79 | 0.459 | 0.83 | ||||
14 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 0.83 | 29 | 0.65 | 0.48 | 0.824 | 49 | 0.72 | 0.567 | 0.829 | ||||
15 | 0.79 | 0.41 | 0.829 | 30 | 0.73 | 0.383 | 0.829 | 50 | 0.73 | 0.498 | 0.827 | ||||
16 | 0.82 | 0.59 | 0.829 | 31 | 0.77 | 0.47 | 0.83 | 51 | 0.69 | 0.356 | 0.827 | ||||
PV | 2,55 | 32 | 0.69 | 0.529 | 0.826 | 52 | 0.72 | 0.512 | 0.828 | ||||||
%V | 4,11 | 33 | 0.73 | 0.602 | 0.829 | PV | 1.79 | ||||||||
% cumulative | 21.02 | PV | 2.05 | %V | 2.60 | ||||||||||
Reliability total | 0.726 | %V | 3.8 | % cumulative | 41.06 | ||||||||||
% cumulative | 32.06 | Reliability total | 0.742 | ||||||||||||
Reliability total | 0.736 |
Indicators | L | M | S | P3 | P5 | P10 | P15 | P25 | P50 | P75 | P85 | P90 | P95 | P97 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | ||||||||||||||
60.0 to 64.9 | −2.83 | 160.20 | 0.07 | 144 | 146 | 149 | 151 | 154 | 160 | 168 | 173 | 176 | 182 | 186 |
65.0 to 69.9 | −0.40 | 159.02 | 0.06 | 142 | 144 | 147 | 149 | 152 | 159 | 166 | 170 | 173 | 177 | 180 |
70.0 to 74.9 | 1.30 | 158.81 | 0.06 | 140 | 142 | 146 | 148 | 152 | 159 | 166 | 169 | 171 | 175 | 177 |
75.0 to 79.9 | 3.15 | 153.94 | 0.06 | 133 | 136 | 141 | 143 | 147 | 154 | 160 | 163 | 165 | 168 | 170 |
>80.0 | 4.21 | 136.68 | 0.06 | 117 | 120 | 125 | 127 | 131 | 137 | 142 | 145 | 146 | 149 | 150 |
BMI (kg/m2) | ||||||||||||||
<26.4 | 2.77 | 161.32 | 0.07 | 137 | 141 | 146 | 149 | 154 | 161 | 169 | 172 | 175 | 178 | 180 |
26.5 to 32.2 | 1.97 | 155.88 | 0.08 | 132 | 135 | 140 | 143 | 148 | 156 | 164 | 168 | 170 | 174 | 177 |
32.3 to 38.0 | 2.98 | 155.12 | 0.07 | 131 | 135 | 140 | 143 | 147 | 155 | 162 | 166 | 168 | 171 | 173 |
>38.1 | 6.87 | 153.47 | 0.06 | 127 | 133 | 139 | 143 | 147 | 154 | 159 | 161 | 163 | 165 | 166 |
C. Neck | ||||||||||||||
<31.4 | 1.81 | 164.79 | 0.07 | 142 | 145 | 149 | 152 | 157 | 165 | 172 | 176 | 179 | 183 | 186 |
31.5 to 35.8 | 2.22 | 157.72 | 0.07 | 134 | 137 | 142 | 145 | 150 | 158 | 165 | 169 | 172 | 176 | 178 |
35.9 to 39.8 | 3.34 | 155.50 | 0.07 | 131 | 135 | 140 | 143 | 148 | 156 | 162 | 166 | 168 | 171 | 173 |
>39.9 | 5.36 | 152.60 | 0.06 | 126 | 131 | 137 | 141 | 145 | 153 | 159 | 162 | 163 | 166 | 167 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gomez-Campos, R.; Vidal-Espinoza, R.; Castelli Correia de Campos, L.F.; Lee-Andruske, C.; Sulla-Torres, J.; Cornejo-Valderrama, C.; Lepe-Martinez, N.; Lagos-Luciano, J.; Monne de la Peña, R.; Urra-Albornoz, C.; et al. Validation of a Self-Perceived Adaptive Behaviors Scale in Older Chilean Women and Percentiles for Evaluation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020731
Gomez-Campos R, Vidal-Espinoza R, Castelli Correia de Campos LF, Lee-Andruske C, Sulla-Torres J, Cornejo-Valderrama C, Lepe-Martinez N, Lagos-Luciano J, Monne de la Peña R, Urra-Albornoz C, et al. Validation of a Self-Perceived Adaptive Behaviors Scale in Older Chilean Women and Percentiles for Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(2):731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020731
Chicago/Turabian StyleGomez-Campos, Rossana, Ruben Vidal-Espinoza, Luis Felipe Castelli Correia de Campos, Cynthia Lee-Andruske, Jose Sulla-Torres, Carolina Cornejo-Valderrama, Nancy Lepe-Martinez, Juan Lagos-Luciano, Rodrigo Monne de la Peña, Camilo Urra-Albornoz, and et al. 2021. "Validation of a Self-Perceived Adaptive Behaviors Scale in Older Chilean Women and Percentiles for Evaluation" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 2: 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020731
APA StyleGomez-Campos, R., Vidal-Espinoza, R., Castelli Correia de Campos, L. F., Lee-Andruske, C., Sulla-Torres, J., Cornejo-Valderrama, C., Lepe-Martinez, N., Lagos-Luciano, J., Monne de la Peña, R., Urra-Albornoz, C., Pezoa-Fuentes, P., & Cossio-Bolaños, M. (2021). Validation of a Self-Perceived Adaptive Behaviors Scale in Older Chilean Women and Percentiles for Evaluation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020731