Next Article in Journal
Role of Individual Motivations and Privacy Concerns in the Adoption of German Electronic Patient Record Apps—A Mixed-Methods Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Workability in the Ageing Workforce—A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Laissez-Faire Strategy Marked by Blinkers to Fulfill Established Pandemic Goals—The Case of Sweden
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Job Security on Deviant Behaviors in Diverse Employment Workplaces: From the Social Identity Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characteristics and Circumstances Associated with Work-Related Suicides from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013–2017

1
Injury Prevention Research Center, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
3
Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
4
Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
5
Department of Public Health, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafeyette, IN 47905, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(18), 9538; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189538
Submission received: 10 August 2021 / Revised: 7 September 2021 / Accepted: 8 September 2021 / Published: 10 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aged Society, Occupational Safety and Health, and Work Sustainability)

Abstract

:
Workplaces are critical in suicide prevention because work-related factors can be associated with suicide, and because workplaces can be effective suicide prevention sites. Understanding the circumstances associated with work-related suicides can advance worksite prevention efforts. Data from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Violent Death Reporting System from 2013 to 2017 were used to examine characteristics and circumstances associated with work compared with non-work suicides. Work-related suicides included those indicated as work-related on the death certificate or in which the death investigation mentioned a work problem or work crisis. Of the 84,389 suicides, 12.1% had some relation to the decedent’s work. Males, those aged 21–54, and with at least a college education, were most likely to have work-related suicides. The circumstances most strongly associated with work-related suicide were financial problems (Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.7; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 4.5–5.0), prior depressed mood (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 2.3–2.5), and eviction/loss of home (OR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.4–1.7). Suicides among healthcare practitioners and management occupations had the highest odds of being work-related. Workplace wellness programs can consider incorporating services, such as financial planning and mental health services, as potentially up-stream approaches to prevent work-related suicide.

1. Introduction

In 2015, Trust for America’s Health issued a report called Pain in the Nation, which identified an “epidemic of despair” measured by increased deaths from suicide, substance use, and alcohol [1]. An update to the original report found that more than 156,000 Americans died from these causes in 2019, which was more than twice the number in 1999 [2]. Suicide rates in the United States are increasing at a rate of 2–5% per year, with increases experienced across nearly all sociodemographic groups [1,2,3]. Suicides are also increasing as a cause of occupational fatality. Since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking workplace suicides in 1992, the number of workplace suicides has increased from 205 to 304 in 2018, a 48% increase [4,5], and the proportion of workplace fatalities that were suicides increased from 3% to 6% [6]. The relevance of these trends is highlighted in the media, including articles focused on workplace suicides in The Washington Post (9 January 2020) and Forbes (5 September 2020) [7,8].
The Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, which relies on the death certificate, worker’s compensation records, and newspaper reports, estimates that 1% to 3% of suicides are work-related. Although the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries has been the most comprehensive data to identify occupational fatalities, its sources have limited information on suicide circumstances and thus estimates for suicide are considerably low [9,10,11]. Data from the National Violent Death Reporting System, which includes more in-depth investigation of circumstances associated with suicide and homicide, identified work factors in 13.5% of suicides [12].
A growing evidence base focused on suicidality continues to identify myriad physical health, mental health, socioeconomic, and environmental risk factors associated with suicidal behavior [13,14,15,16,17]. Occupation and factors associated with work are emerging as recognized areas of suicide risk. For example, occupations such as military service, healthcare, mining, farming, and construction have been identified as having high suicide rates [18,19,20,21]. Work stress, job loss, and job-related financial stress have been identified as suicide risk factors [22,23,24]. However, most studies of work-related factors in suicide have either focused on overall prevalence, or have examined only individual risk factors (e.g., work stress) or individual sectors (e.g., military). Few studies have examined multiple work-related circumstances including all occupations.
Curtailing the increasing suicide trend will require an understanding of the circumstances related to suicidal behavior. Such information can help prioritize focused prevention strategies, as well as identify settings for prevention, early detection, and referral to services. The workplace provides an important site for suicide prevention activities because worksites have the structure and employee interaction to identify suicidality and to provide support and referral services. The objective of this analysis is to examine individual characteristics, suicide mechanism, and circumstances associated with work-related suicides. Work factors and other circumstances associated with suicides are from the in-depth investigation information in the National Violent Death Reporting System, which we included from 2013 to 2017.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Data Source

This retrospective study of suicides examines data from the US National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) from 2013 through 2017 (which was the latest year that data were available at the time of this analysis). Data were obtained through the approval process of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC) standard process. The study was approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board.
NVDRS data are collected by states through a contract with CDC/NCIPC and include information from death certificates, autopsy reports, law enforcement investigation reports, and crime scene analyses. Between 2013 and 2017, the NVDRS system included 35 states as well as Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. During these study years, 17 states reported data in all of the study years, and the remaining 18 states reported for at least one year. To assure comparisons were valid, we examined the proportion of suicides that were work-related and not work-related between the 17 states that reported each year to the proportions using all reporting states for each year. This comparison yielded similar results (Table 1). We used reports from all reporting states in the remainder of the analysis. Years prior to 2013 were excluded because the variables describing underlying circumstance were different in prior years.
In order to maximize representation of the sample to the working population, suicides within the age group of 16 (when most states issue work permits) to 65 (the most common age of retirement) were included. From 2013 to 2017, the NVDRS included 84,389 suicides in this age range from all states reporting to the system for at least one year.

2.2. Study Variables

Within the NVDRS, three variables identify if work has any relation to the decedent’s death. The death certificate indicates if the death was an “injury-at-work” with a yes/no response. According to instructions from the CDC [25], an injury at work applies to any occupation, not just the “usual occupation”, and includes deaths that occur during paid work, training, or volunteering in any area of a work premises, including while on a break, and including travel for business. The NVDRS codes a “job problem” if the record includes that the decedent experienced a problem related to work, such as the following: tensions with a co-worker or manager, poor performance review, increased pressure at work, fear of losing the job, or recently laid off from the job. If the record listed occupation as unemployed without any specific job problems identified, the death was not considered to have work factors. A “job crisis” was defined by the NVDRS as a job problem current at the time of death or had occurred within two weeks of the death (CDC 2020). Thus, the “job crisis” variable is a subset of the “job problem” variable for which the job problem was proximal in time and a priority factor identified in the suicide circumstances. The variables “job problem” and “job crisis” are coded by trained abstractors for each NVDRS site. A prior analysis has examined the frequency and overlap of these reporting sources [12].
Using these three NVDRS variables, we created three categories to indicate the extent to which the suicide was related to work. We coded work as a major factor in the suicide if the death certificate indicated the injury was at work or if the job problem was a crisis, a minor factor if the job problem variable was positive, but was not a crisis and the death certificate did not indicate injury at work, and not a factor if no variable identified any work or job ties. This three-category work factor variable was our primary dependent variable.
We examined demographic characteristics of suicide cases including sex, age, marital status, education, occupation, and race. Main independent variables were the mechanism of the suicide and the circumstances coded as being related to the suicide. The circumstances included a history of mental health problems, depressed mood, alcohol use problems, family or other relationship problems, a recent argument, a recent death, a history of suicide attempt, leaving a suicide note, physical health problems, financial problems, and eviction/loss of home. Definitions for circumstances and other NVDRS variables can be found in the NVDRS codebook [25].

2.3. Analysis

Suicides were categorized as a major factor, minor factor, or not a factor. The proportion of all suicides that were identified in each of the three categories were compared by year, sex, age, marriage, education, race, suicide mechanism, and circumstances using the Chi-Squared Test for Independence. Among the 84,389 suicides, 7515 (8.9%) did not have any recorded circumstances. Circumstances can be missing if the records from NVDRS data sources (medical examiner reports or law enforcement reports) were not available for abstraction, had insufficient detail to identify any circumstances, or had none of the abstracted circumstances associated with the death. We included all 84,389 cases to examine yearly trends and demographic characteristics. Only the 76,874 records with known circumstances were included to compare suicide mechanism and circumstances and for multivariable modeling.
To identify which circumstances related to a suicide were associated with work-related factors, we applied a stepwise model selection procedure based on baseline-category logit models. Suicides for which work was not a factor served as the reference. Two logit models were fitted to examine the work factor variable level of a major factor or a minor factor in comparison to the reference of not a factor. For example, let π1, π2, and π3 denote the proportion of a major factor, a minor factor, and not a factor respectively, and the two logit models compared with the reference of not a factor were: log(π1/π3) = X*β1, and log(π2/π3) = X*β2, in which the covariates (X) are the same in both models, but β1 and β2 are different coefficients. A significance level of 0.05 was required to allow a variable into the model and a significance level of 0.0001 was required for a variable to stay in the model. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R version 4.0.4 (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

Of the 84,389 suicides included in this analysis, more than 12.1% included some relatedness with work, of which 8.7% of the death investigations identified that work factors were a minor problem and 3.4% identified work factors as a major problem associated with the suicide (Table 1). The proportion of suicides that involved work factors did not change significantly from the period of 2013 to 2017. Trends were similar in the 17 states that reported data through the entire reporting period compared to the 37 states that reported for at least one of the study years.
Both minor and major work factors were more prevalent in suicides committed by males than females (Table 2). Work factors were the least prevalent among suicides in the age group of 16–20, which likely has the fewest full-time workers. Work factors were most common in suicides among those aged 35–54, with 9.9% involving work as a factor and 3.9% a major factor. Being married or divorced/separated had the highest prevalence of work factors contributing to their suicide, and those with a college education or above had the highest prevalence. Work factors were documented most frequently in suicides committed by those coded as being White, non-Hispanic.
Suicides among six occupations that identified 5% or more as involving work as a major factor included: management (6.8%), legal services (6.5%), protective services (5.6%), architecture and engineering (5.4%), life, physical, and social sciences (5.4%), and healthcare practitioners and technical (5.2%) (Table 2). The lowest were food preparation and service (2.9%), construction and extraction (2.7%), personal care and service (2.7%), healthcare support (2.6%), and community and social service (2.6%). The occupations that identified the highest percentage of work as a minor factor were legal services (16.6%), computer and mathematic services (14.2%), life, physical, and social sciences (13.8%), and business and financial operations (13.7%).
The 76,874 records (91.9% of all records) with known circumstances were included to compare suicide mechanism and circumstances (Table 3). The most common mechanisms of death among suicides that had identified work factors were hanging/asphyxiation (10% as a minor factor and 4.1% as a major factor) and firearms (10.6% as a minor factor and 3.7% as a major factor). The suicide circumstances more commonly associated with work factors were financial problems (33.6% as a minor factor and 7.5% as a major factor) and eviction or loss of home (22.9% as a minor factor and 5.4% as a major factor).
Table 4 presents effect estimates from a logistic model selecting variables that best predicted work factors (minor and major work factors combined). Overall, the model Concordance Index (also known as the c statistic) was 0.75, indicating a good prediction of work factors in suicide. Being male, between the ages of 21 and 54, and being married increased the likelihood of the suicide being work-related. Suicides among those aged 16 to 20 and above the age of 55 were less likely to be work-related. The odds of work-related suicide increased with increasing education levels. Poisoning as a mechanism of suicide was less likely to be work-related, with hanging and firearms being the most prevalent mechanisms among work-related suicides.
Eight occupations were associated with work-related suicide. Suicides among health practitioners had the highest odds of being work-related with an odds ratio of 1.82 (95% CI = 1.62–2.04), followed by management (Odds Ratio (OR)= 1.5; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.38–1.63). The odds of suicides being work-related were significantly elevated for business and financial operations (OR = 1.48; 95% CI = 1.28–1.70), protective services (OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.25–1.64), office and administrative support (OR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.23–1.52), computer and mathematical occupations (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.15–1.52), and sales and related occupations (OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.17–1.40). The odds of suicides among construction and extraction occupations being work-related were lower than other occupations (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = 0.79–0.92).
Among the ten NVDRS circumstances associated with work factors in suicide, the strongest association was with financial problems (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 4.5–5.0), depressed mood (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 2.3–2.5), and eviction/loss of home (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.4–1.7). Other circumstances that were positively associated with work-related suicide were alcohol problems, relationship and family relationship problems, and leaving a suicide note. A history of suicide attempts, recent death of a loved one, and a recent argument were negatively associated with work-related suicide. Mental health problems (excluding depression) and physical health problems were not strongly associated with work-related suicide (not selected in the model).

4. Discussion

We found that suicides have more work-related circumstances than previously identified by a factor of up to ten-fold, with work identified as a major factor in more than 3% of suicides and a minor factor in approximately 9% [12]. Prior to the implementation of the National Violent Death Reporting System, data on specific work circumstances and other contributing factors were not widely available and were not available at a national level. This is the first study to use the NVDRS information from death investigations to identify the prevalence of work factors in suicides and the related circumstances.
Suicide cases that identified financial problems as related to the suicide were 4.7 times more likely, and those experiencing eviction/loss of home were 1.57 times more likely, to be identified as work-related. Prior studies have identified an association between financial strain and suicide/suicide attempts. For example, one prior study examined suicide circumstances among those aged 40 to 64 years old and found that job, financial, and legal problems increased from 32.9% to 37.5% from 2005 to 2010 [26]. Research using a national US sample found that financial strain, including unemployment, was associated with an increased odds of attempting suicide of approximately 1.5 [27]. A US policy evaluation found that a one dollar increase in the real minimum wage was associated with an average 1.9% decrease in the state suicide rate [28]. However, none of these studies examined specific circumstances that are related to work-related suicide.
We also found that depressed mood, alcohol problems, and relationship problems were associated with an increased odds of work-related suicide. These results are consistent with many studies that have found these circumstances associated with overall suicide risk [26,29,30,31,32]. Although a history of suicide attempt, death of a friend or family member, and prior argument have been associated with suicide risk [33,34,35], we found these circumstances to be negatively associated with work-relatedness of a suicide. The reason for these risk factors not being associated with work factors is not clear. Perhaps work-related factors that proceed a suicide are acute in nature, and the factors that make prior suicide history such a strong risk factor for a suicide are not frequently co-occurring with work factors.
Suicides among healthcare, management, business/financial operations, protective services, office/administrative support, computer/mathematical, and sales/related occupations were more likely to be work-related than all other occupations. Many of these occupations have been previously identified as being at high risk of suicide [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. We found that suicides in the construction occupations were less likely to be work-related. Prior research, including estimates based on the NVDRS, have found suicide rates among construction workers to be among the highest of all occupations [20]. However, our findings are not contradictory, because Peterson et al. estimated suicide rates among the population by occupation, and we are estimating the odds that a suicide is work-related [20]. Thus, although suicide rates among construction workers are very high, these suicides are less likely to identify job problems as an underlying circumstance or have the death certificate indicate that the suicide was work-related. Our findings help identify occupations in which work-related factors are frequent among suicides, but do not identify occupations in which suicides are more prevalent. At the workplace level, work factors may be more prevalent in occupations that have inherently stressful work environments, either based on the work duties or work organization factors. Work factors could also be at the individual level, such as issues with work performance.
This study has several limitations. The NVDRS has recently expanded to all states but is not yet a population-based surveillance system. During the study years of 2013–2017, 15 states were not yet providing data and not all states were state-wide: 17 states reported for all 5 study years, and the number of reporting states grew from 17 to 37 over this period. Our sensitivity analysis found that trends in work factors did not vary substantially when using the 17 recurring states or all reporting states. Death investigations focus on the factors that are a priority for each individual case, and despite having clear definitions of work-related variables, not every investigation is going to include work factors, especially if they are not the main circumstances. Since death investigations and certifications are conducted by a large number of teams across each state, and these teams have various areas of expertise, there is considerable variance in how investigation information is collected. Variation likely also exists in state collection of NVDRS data. At the time of this analysis, data only through 2017 were available. With the many sources of data and the high-quality validation process at the federal level, there is a delay in access to data.
Despite these limitations, this study provides new information about the types of occupations and circumstances that are associated with work-related suicides. The workplace is an important site for suicide prevention because workplaces are a promising partner in the development and implementation of suicide prevention activities, and because workplaces have personnel, economic, and work culture impacts from suicide. Currently, workplaces have little information about the prevalence and co-occurrence of the underlying factors because little research has examined this topic.

5. Conclusions

Programs to prevent suicide can support the employee population by providing resources and expertise focused on the underlying circumstances contributing to the suicidal ideation, which include the circumstances identified in this analysis [36]. The evidence base for workplace suicide prevention is growing in some sectors such as law enforcement [37] and healthcare [38], but reviews consistently identify the inability of workplace prevention programs to focus on specific risk factors as a hindrance to program development and implementation [36,39,40]. Conceptually driven evaluations of outcomes are also lacking, in part because the specific short-term outcomes are difficult to define without information about underlying factors that can increase the risk for suicide. This study identified characteristics, occupations, and circumstances that are more likely to be associated with work-related than non-work-related suicides. Such information, which have not been previously reported, can help prioritize occupations and workers and can help focus prevention efforts. For example, these findings suggest that total worker health and wellness programs may consider incorporating financial support, mental health, alcohol reduction, and relationship health services into their programming to address circumstances associated with work-related suicide.

Author Contributions

C.P.-A. obtained and oversaw data acquisition, developed and oversaw analysis, and drafted and edited versions of the manuscript; L.Z. conducted the analysis, drafted portions of the methods section, and contributed to interpretation of the findings; C.H. and J.D. contributed to developing the research question, analytic strategy, interpretation of analyses, and edited the manuscript; L.S.-R. contributed to development of the study design and edited the manuscript. All authors are responsible for the content of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Healthier Workforce Center of the Midwest (Grant Number 5 U19 OH008868 from CDC/NIOSH) and the University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center (CDC/NCIPC R49CE003095-02-00).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved as an expedited study using de-identified data through the University of Iowa Human Subject Office. Data were obtained through a standard agreement with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Access to these data are through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Injury Prevention and Control: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/datasources/nvdrs/index.html.

Acknowledgments

Contributors to this report included participating state Violent Death Reporting Systems, and participating state agencies, including state health departments, vital registrars’ offices, coroners’/medical examiners’ offices, crime laboratories, and local and state law enforcement agencies. NVDRS acknowledges its partner organizations: the Safe States Alliance, American Public Health Association, International Association of Chiefs of Police, National Association of Medical Examiners, National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems, National Violence Prevention Network, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, and Association of State and Territorial Health Officials; federal agencies, including the US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; other stakeholders, researchers, and foundations, including Harvard University Injury Control Research Center and the Joyce Foundation, and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and National Center for Health Statistics, CDC.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. This research uses data from NVDRS, a surveillance system designed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. The findings are based, in part, on the contributions of the funded states and territories that collected violent death data and the contributions of the states’ partners, including personnel from law enforcement, vital records, medical examiners/coroners, and crime laboratories. The analyses, results, and conclusions presented here represent those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the CDC. Persons interested in obtaining data files from NVDRS should contact the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, MS F-64, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, (800) CDC-INFO (232-4636).

References

  1. Trust for America’s Health. Pain in the Nation: The Drug, Alcohol, and Suicide Crises and Need for a National Resilience Strategy; Trust for America’s Health: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; Available online: https://www.tfah.org/report-details/pain-in-the-nation/ (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  2. Trust for America’s Health. Pain in the Nation: Alcohol, Suicide, and Drug Epidemics; Trust for America’s Health: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; Available online: https://www.tfah.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2021_PainInTheNation_Fnl.pdf (accessed on 17 June 2021).
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Suicide Rising across the US: More Than a Mental Health Problem. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/suicide/index.html (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  4. Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries. 2018. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/charts/census-of-fatal-occupational-injuries/fatal-occupational-injuries-by-event-drilldown.htm (accessed on 15 May 2021).
  5. Bureau of Labor Statistics; USA Department of Labor. The Economics Daily: Workplace Suicides Reach Historic High in 2018. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2020/workplace-suicides-reach-historic-high-in-2018.htm (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  6. Harris, R. Suicide in the Workplace. Mon. Labor Rev. 2016. Available online: https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2016/article/suicide-in-the-workplace.htm (accessed on 6 June 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Robinson, B. Grappling with the rise of work-related suicide during the pandemic: How to support yourself and fellow co-workers. Forbes. 2020. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2020/09/05/grappling-with-the-rise-of-work-related-suicide-during-the-pandemic-how-to-support-yourself-and-fellow-coworkers/?sh=14fb327e48d2 (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  8. Wan, W. More Americans are killing themselves at work: Companies grapple with what is appropriate to share and how to support co-workers. Wash. Post. 2020. Available online: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/01/09/more-americans-are-killing-themselves-work/ (accessed on 6 June 2021).
  9. Kraus, J.F.; Peek, C.; Silberman, T.; Anderson, C. The accuracy of death certificates in identifying work-related fatal injuries. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1995, 141, 973–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oliveri, A.N.; Wang, L.; Rosenman, K.D. Assessing the accuracy of the death certificate injury at work box for identifying fatal occupational injuries in Michigan. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2020, 63, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peek-Asa, C.; McArthur, D.L.; Kraus, J.F. Determining injury at work on the California death certificate. Am. J. Public Health 1997, 87, 998–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Peek-Asa, C.; Zhang, L.; Hamann, C.; Davis, J.; Casteel, C. The prevalence of work-related suicides varies by reporting source from the National Violent Death Reporting System. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2021, 64, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brodsky, B.S.; Mann, J.J.; Stanley, B.; Tin, A.; Oquendo, M.; Birmaher, B.; Greenhill, L.; Kolko, D.; Zelazny, J.; Burke, A.K.; et al. Familial transmission of suicidal behavior: Factors mediating the relationship between childhood abuse and offspring suicide attempts. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2008, 69, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kerr, W.C.; Kaplan, M.S.; Huguet, N.; Caetano, R.; Giesbrecht, N.; McFarland, B.H. Economic Recession, Alcohol, and Suicide Rates: Comparative Effects of Poverty, Foreclosure, and Job Loss. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 52, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Reeves, A.; Stuckler, D.; McKee, M.; Gunnell, D.; Chang, S.-S.; Basu, S. Increase in state suicide rates in the USA during economic recession. Lancet 2021, 380, 1813–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stone, D.M.; Simon, T.R.; Fowler, K.A.; Kegler, S.R.; Yuan, K.; Holland, K.M.; Ivey-Stephenson, A.Z.; Crosby, A.E. Vital Signs: Trends in State Suicide Rates—United States, 1999–2016 and Circumstances Contributing to Suicide—27 States, 2015. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Wanner, B.; Vitaro, F.; Tremblay, R.E.; Turecki, G. Childhood trajectories of anxiousness and disruptiveness explain the association between early-life adversity and attempted suicide. Psychol. Med. 2021, 42, 2373–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dutheil, F.; Aubert, C.; Pereira, B.; Dambrun, M.; Moustafa, F.; Mermillod, M.; Baker, J.S.; Trousselard, M.; Lesage, F.-X.; Navel, V. Suicide among physicians and health-care workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0226361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Peterson, C.; Stone, D.M.; Marsh, S.M.; Schumacher, P.K.; Tiesman, H.M.; McIntosh, W.L.; Lokey, C.N.; Trudeau, A.R.T.; Bartholow, B.; Luo, F. Suicide rates by major occupational group—17 states, 2012 and 2015. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2018, 67, 1253–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Peterson, C.; Sussell, A.; Li, J.; Schumacher, P.K.; Yeoman, K.; Stone, D.M. Suicide Rates by Industry and Occupation—National Violent Death Reporting System, 32 States, 2016. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Windsor-Shellard, B.; Gunnell, D. Occupation-specific suicide risk in England: 2011–2015. Br. J. Psychiatry 2019, 1, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Alexopoulos, E.C.; Kavalidou, K.; Messolora, F. Suicide Mortality Patterns in Greek Work Force before and during the Economic Crisis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, S.Y.; Shin, Y.C.; Oh, K.S.; Shin, D.W.; Lim, W.J.; Cho, S.J.; Jeon, S.W. Association between work stress and risk of suicidal ideation: A cohort study among Korean employees examining gender and age differences. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2019, 46, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Steele, I.H.; Thrower, N.; Noroian, P.; Saleh, F.M. Understanding Suicide across the Lifespan: A United States Perspective of Suicide Risk Factors, Assessment & Management. J. Forensic Sci. 2018, 63, 162–171. [Google Scholar]
  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) Coding Manual Revised (Online) 2020 National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Producer). Available online: www.cdc.gov/injury (accessed on 20 July 2020).
  26. Hempstead, K.A.; Phillips, J.A. Rising suicide among adults aged 40–64 years: The roel of job and financial circumstances. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2015, 48, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elbogen, E.B.; Lanier, M.; Montgomery, A.E.; Strickland, S.; Wagner, H.R.; Tsai, J. Financial Strain and Suicide Attempts in a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults. Am. J. Epidemio. 2020, 189, 1266–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gertner, A.K.; Rotter, J.S.; Shafer, P.R. Association between state minimum wages and suicide rates in the US. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2019, 56, 648–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bullman, T.; Schneiderman, A.; Gradus, J.L. Relative Importance of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression in Predicting Risk of Suicide among a Cohort of Vietnam Veterans. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2019, 49, 838–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Duberstein, P.R.; Conwell, Y.; Conner, K.R.; Eberly, S.; Caine, E.D. Suicide at 50 years of age and older: Perceived physical illness, family discord, and financial strain. Psychol. Med. 2004, 34, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Glasheen, C.; Forman-Hoffman, V.L. Residential Transience, Major Depressive Episodes, and the Risk of Suicidal Thoughts, Plans, and Attempts. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2015, 45, 690–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rizk, M.M.; Herzog, S.; Dugad, S.; Stanley, B. Curr Suicide Risk and Addiction: The Impact of Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorders. Addict. Rep. 2021, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  33. Joiner, T.E.; Rudd, M.D. Intensity and duration of suicidal crises vary as a function of previous suicide attempts and negative life events. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2000, 68, 909–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hollingshaus, M.S.; Smith, K.R. Life and death in the family: Early parental death, parental remarriage, and offspring suicide risk in adulthood. Soc. Sci. Med. 2015, 131, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Martinez-Ales, G.; Hernandez-Calle, D.; Khauli, N.; Keyes, K.M. Why Are Suicide Rates Increasing in the United States? Towards a Multilevel Reimagination of Suicide Prevention. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2020, 46, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  36. Mann, J.J.; Michel, C.A.; Auerback, R.P. Improving suicide prevention through evidence-based strategies: A systematic review. Am. J. Psychiatry 2021, 178, 611–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Witt, K.; Milner, A.; Allisey, A.; Davenport, L.; LaMontagne, A.D. Effectiveness of suicide prevention programs for emergency and protective services employees: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2017, 60, 394–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kleinpell, R.; Moss, M.; Good, V.S.; Gozal, D.; Sessler, C.N. The Critical Nature of Addressing Burnout Prevention: Results from the Critical Care Societies Collaborative’s National Summit and Survey on Prevention and Management of Burnout in the ICU. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 48, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Milner, A.; Page, K.; Spencer-Thomas, S.; Lamotagne, A.D. Workplace suicide prevention: A systematic review of published and unpublished activities. Health Promot. Int. 2015, 30, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Takada, M.; Shima, S. Characteristics and effects of suicide prevention programs: Comparison between workplace and other settings. Ind. Health 2010, 48, 416–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1. Proportion of suicides for which work was a minor, major, or no contributing factor, National Violent Death Reporting System, by all reporting states and 17 states reporting each year from 2013 through 2017.
Table 1. Proportion of suicides for which work was a minor, major, or no contributing factor, National Violent Death Reporting System, by all reporting states and 17 states reporting each year from 2013 through 2017.
YearNumber of StatesNot a Factor
N (%)
A Minor Factor
N (%)
A Major Factor
N (%)
Total Number of Suicides (N)
All Reporting States
2013179281 (86.13)1137 (10.55)357 (3.31)10,775
20141810,505 (87.21)1094 (9.08)447 (3.71)12,046
20152714,793 (88.34)1431 (8.55)522 (3.12)16,746
20163218,403 (87.95)1822 (8.71)700 (3.35)20,925
20173721,191 (88.68)1860 (7.78)846 (3.54)23,897
Total3774,173 (87.89)7344 (8.70)2872 (3.40)84,389
States Reporting for All Study Years
2013179281 (86.13)1137 (10.55)357 (3.31)10,775
2014179509 (86.92)996 (9.10)435 (3.98)10,940
20151710,075 (88.40)922 (8.09)400 (3.51)11,397
20161710,142 (87.63)996 (8.61)436 (3.77)11,574
20171710,660 (88.56)898 (7.46)479 (3.98)12,037
Total1749,667 (87.56)4949 (8.72)2107 (3.71)56,723
Table 2. Proportion of suicides for which work was a minor, major, or not a contributing factor, by demographic characteristics, National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013 through 2017.
Table 2. Proportion of suicides for which work was a minor, major, or not a contributing factor, by demographic characteristics, National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013 through 2017.
CharacteristicTotal NumberNot a Factor (%)A Minor Factor (%)A Major Factor (%)Chi-Square Test
Overall Percent 87.898.703.40
Sex 1 <0.0001
Male64,46686.599.603.82
Female19,92292.125.812.07
Age <0.0001
16–20577595.293.311.40
21–3423,88489.207.753.05
35–5436,76386.149.933.93
55–6417,96787.379.193.44
Marriage <0.0001
Married/Civil Union/Widowed26,60685.929.544.54
Never Married/Single35,66589.527.792.69
Divorced/ Married but Separated21,03087.469.353.19
Other/Unknown108891.365.613.03
Education <0.0001
Less Than High School11,29292.845.161.99
High School Diploma/Some College Credit, But No Degree45,09188.818.003.19
College and Above19,06683.5411.784.68
Unknown894086.3110.153.55
Race <0.0001
White, Non-Hispanic68,50287.379.133.49
Black or African American, Non-Hispanic566990.406.702.89
Hispanic556490.316.523.16
Other Race, Non-Hispanic337089.387.423.20
Other/Unknown128490.267.322.41
Occupation <0.0001
Management508980.8012.426.78
Legal52376.8616.636.50
Protective Service185483.1711.275.56
Architecture and Engineering151181.7312.845.43
Life, Physical, and Social Science52280.8413.795.36
Healthcare Practitioners and Technical273682.5712.215.23
Business and Financial Operations166381.3613.714.93
Computer and Mathematical164681.3514.164.50
Sales and Related533484.5311.294.18
Farming, Fishing, and Forestry58590.095.814.10
Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance257388.267.734.00
Educational Instruction and Library130687.988.193.83
Installation, Maintenance, and Repair436786.429.783.80
Transportation and Material Moving629587.249.093.67
Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media173786.3610.073.57
Production542186.949.503.56
Office and Administrative Support389787.129.493.39
Food Preparation and Serving Related314589.637.472.89
Personal Care and Service157390.466.802.73
Construction and Extraction933789.387.982.65
Community and Social Service66388.399.052.56
Healthcare Support113890.077.382.55
1 One suicide was missing sex.
Table 3. Proportion of suicides for which work was a minor, major, or not a contributing factor, by mechanism and circumstances, National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013 through 2017 *.
Table 3. Proportion of suicides for which work was a minor, major, or not a contributing factor, by mechanism and circumstances, National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013 through 2017 *.
CharacteristicTotal NumberNot a Factor (%)A Minor Factor (%)A Major Factor (%)Chi-Square Test
Overall percent 86.859.553.60
Mechanism <0.0001
Fall183889.346.474.19
Hanging/Strangulation/Suffocation24,00485.8610.054.09
Firearms34,84585.6510.613.74
Fire or Burns33090.916.362.73
Drowning73490.466.812.72
Poison12,10690.816.852.35
Transportation126191.995.872.14
Other Weapon156987.898.163.95
Other/Unknown18590.275.953.78
Circumstances
Financial Problem766158.8633.617.53<0.0001
Eviction or Loss of Home314771.7822.855.37<0.0001
Depressed Mood28,05979.0015.965.04<0.0001
Relationship Problems with Others189280.8114.434.76<0.0001
Alcohol Problem15,62182.8413.173.98<0.0001
Suicide Note25,89185.6610.453.90<0.0001
Family Relationship Problem758183.3813.033.59<0.0001
Mental Health Problem38,90286.979.783.25<0.0001
Death Friend or Family, or Other431886.859.553.600.0228
Physical Health Problem11,69585.7511.213.04<0.0001
Argument13,73288.688.602.72<0.0001
Suicide Attempt History16,91588.468.952.59<0.0001
* Note: 7515 subjects with unknown circumstances were excluded from this table and from multivariable models.
Table 4. Characteristics and circumstances predicting work-related suicides (minor and major factors combined), National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013 through 2017 *.
Table 4. Characteristics and circumstances predicting work-related suicides (minor and major factors combined), National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013 through 2017 *.
Characteristic/CircumstanceTotal NumberOdds Ratio95% CI
Lower Limits
95% CI
Upper Limits
Demographic Characteristics
Male58,3461.961.842.09
Age group 16 to 2052090.520.450.59
Age group 55 to 6416,3960.810.760.86
Married or Civil Union, or Widowed24,3071.261.201.32
Education Less Than High School10,1390.740.680.80
Education College and Above17,5331.341.271.41
Mechanism of Poison12,1050.730.670.78
Occupation
Occupation: Healthcare Practitioners25571.821.622.04
Occupation: Management46701.501.381.63
Occupation: Business and Financial Operations15381.481.281.70
Occupation: Protective Service16881.441.251.64
Occupation: Office and Administrative Support36171.361.231.52
Occupation: Computer and Mathematical15221.321.151.52
Occupation: Sales and Related Occupations49161.281.171.40
Occupation: Construction and Extraction84960.850.790.92
Circumstances
Financial Problem76614.704.454.97
Depressed Mood28,0602.392.292.50
Eviction or Loss of Home31471.571.431.72
Alcohol Problem15,6211.321.251.39
Relationship Problem with Others18921.361.191.54
Family Relationship75811.251.171.35
Suicide Note25,8921.121.061.16
Suicide Attempt History16,9150.870.820.92
Death Friend or Family, or Other43180.830.750.91
Argument13,7320.790.740.84
* Note: 7515 subjects with unknown circumstances were excluded.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peek-Asa, C.; Zhang, L.; Hamann, C.; Davis, J.; Schwab-Reese, L. Characteristics and Circumstances Associated with Work-Related Suicides from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013–2017. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189538

AMA Style

Peek-Asa C, Zhang L, Hamann C, Davis J, Schwab-Reese L. Characteristics and Circumstances Associated with Work-Related Suicides from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013–2017. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(18):9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peek-Asa, Corinne, Ling Zhang, Cara Hamann, Jonathan Davis, and Laura Schwab-Reese. 2021. "Characteristics and Circumstances Associated with Work-Related Suicides from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2013–2017" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 18: 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop