Next Article in Journal
Virtual Reality as a Promising Tool Supporting Oncological Treatment in Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
The Pandemic beyond the Pandemic: A Scoping Review on the Social Relationships between COVID-19 and Antimicrobial Resistance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Radioactivity Level in the Terrestrial and Marine Organisms in Yangjiang and Its Adjacent Areas (China)

1
South China Sea Environment Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration (SOA), Guangzhou 510300, China
2
South China Sea Testing and Appraisal Center, State Oceanic Administration (SOA), Guangzhou 510300, China
3
Nansha Islands Coral Reef Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Guangzhou 510300, China
4
Key Laboratory of Marine Enironmental Survey Technology and Application, Ministry of Natural Resources of People’s Republic of China (MNR), Guangzhou 510300, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(16), 8767; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168767
Submission received: 29 June 2021 / Revised: 6 August 2021 / Accepted: 9 August 2021 / Published: 19 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Public Health Statistics and Risk Assessment)

Abstract

:
In order to assess the radioactive level in the terrestrial and marine organisms in Yangjiang and the adjacent areas, 90Sr, gross beta and gamma-emitting radionuclides (238U, 226Ra, 228Th, 226Ra, 40K, 137Cs, 51Cr, 55Fe, 54Mn, 58Co, 60Co and 65Zn) were analyzed from 2011 to 2012. The annual effective doses were estimated in the high natural radioactive background areas in Yangjiang (HBRAYJ). The specific activities of 238U, 228Th, 226Ra, 40K and 137Cs in all organisms were <0.05–5.20, 0.30–14.50, 0.11–3.58, 11.1–148.0 and <0.003–0.088 Bq/kg, whilst 51Cr, 55Fe, 54Mn, 58Co, 60Co, 65Zn and 110mAg were below the minimum detectable activity. 90Sr and gross beta specific activities were 20.0–143.0 and 0.021–0.316 Bq/kg. Results show that 228Th was significantly higher than 238U and 226Ra of natural U series in organisms due to the rich-Th soils in the HBRAYJ; 228Th, 226Ra, 40K, 137Cs and 90Sr were greatly lower than the limited concentrations in Chinese foods. The internal dose mainly contributes to natural 40K, 226Ra and 228Th. It is useful to provide some basic data and assess the radiological risk from the HBRAYJ and Yangjiang nuclear power plants in future.

1. Introduction

Yangjiang is one of the famous areas with high natural radioactive background areas (HBRAYJ) in China, where the radiation level is about three times more than that in its adjacent normal background radiation areas (CA). Two HBRA regions with ~540 km2 are Dong-anling region (including three villages of Yong’an, Huan’an and Liang’an) and Tongyou region [1,2,3,4]. Yangjiang nuclear power plants (i.e., YJNPP) base is situated at the eastern coast in Dongping in Yangjiang, where six nuclear power units (6 × 1080 MW) have been built at present. The YJNPP site is more than 30 km away from the HBRAYJ, so that the natural radioactivity in the YJNPP base is generally at the normal background level [5]. The No.1 nuclear power unit began to be built on 26 September 2007 and came into operation on 26 March 2014. At present, six nuclear power units had been put into commercial operation until 24 July 2019. The low-level anthropogenic radioactive liquid and gas from the YJNPP normal operation maybe influence directly and/or indirectly the surrounding terrestrial and marine environment. Some radionuclides (e.g., 3H in water and gamma-emitting radionuclides in marine sediments) and radiation effect have been studied near YJNPP [5,6,7].
It is known that nuclear power is a clean and high-quality energy that can improve China’s energy supply structure, ensure energy and economic security and protect the environment. The development of Yangjiang city was always restricted by power and infrastructure at past. The YJNPP is a nuclear power plant built within/near the HBRAYJ. Such examples of building nuclear power plants in high-level areas are rare in the world. The effects of low dose radiation on human in the HBRAYJ has been still an unsolved but very important issue. In addition, the effects of low dose radiation on non-human species has become a concern since the beginning of this century. Therefore, it is a necessary task to investigate systematically the current radioactive levels and assess scientifically the potential risk.
It is important to determine the radionuclides in the environment because they constitute a source of exposure of flora, fauna and humans. Assessments of such radiological consequences to the environment generally include consideration of the dose from ingestion of contaminated foodstuffs [8]. Here, some organisms were collected in Yangjiang and the adjacent areas during August 2011–April 2012, according to the local production and diet habits. This radioactive investigation in various species organisms is conducted firstly and systematically. Some items of 238U, 228Th, 226Ra, 40K, 90Sr, 137Cs, 134Cs, 51Cr, 55Fe, 54Mn, 58Co, 60Co, 65Zn, 110mAg and gross beta were analyzed to estimate annual effective dose near the HBRAYJ and YJNPP. Just sampling time is after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plants Accident (FNA) in March 2011, and before the YJNPP commercial operation. Therefore, our results are expected to provide some basic background data. The dose calculations should help the public quantitatively assessing the risk associated with consumption of these popular organisms. It is useful to the routine and emergency radioactive monitoring around the YJNNP. This study is also expected and help to assess the radiological risk from the HBRAYJ and Yangjiang nuclear power plants in future.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Preparation

Samples were collected from the local field-cultivated areas or markets in Yangjiang and the adjacent areas (viz, Dongping, Dagou, Huangjiangwei, Zhapo, Xiachuan island) from 5 August 2011 to 3 December 2012 (Figure 1). These organisms included twitch grass, bok-choy, sweet potato, unhulled rice, turnip, sugarcane, chicken, freshwater/sea fish, sea shrimp and mollusks (eg. oysters, mussels), etc. All organisms are divided into six sorts based on the local diet, viz, Crops, Potatoes, Vegetables/fruits, Fodder, Meat/fish/shrimp. The measurement and date possess were performed in the Radioactivity Monitoring Laboratory of South China Sea Environment Monitoring Center, State Oceanic Administration (SOA), China.

2.2. Analytical Methods

For plant samples, 5.0~10 kg of samples were purchased from the peasant, transported to the laboratory under the 4 °C conditions. Twitch grass, bok-choy, sweet potato, turnip and sugarcane were washed, minced, aired and then weighted. The unhulled rice was aired and then weighted. Subsequently, these wet samples were dried at 105 ± 5 °C. Finally, the dried samples were put into a muffler furnace for carbonization at ≤250 °C for ~48 h, followed by ashing to white or greyish white at ≤450 °C. The ignition must avoid open flame or some radionuclides will escape [9]. The ash was milled, sifted using an 80 mesh, weighed, wrapped using PE bags to counting. For zoological samples, 10~20 kg of samples were collected or purchased from the peasant/fisherman, transported to the laboratory under the −20 °C conditions. Chicken (without head and internal organs), fish (with head, scales and internal organs), shrimp (with head, shell and meat) and mollusks without the hard shells (with head, gonads and internal organs) were washed, aired and then weighted. As described above, the samples were dried, ignited to ash, milled, sifted, weighed and then wrapped subsequently.

2.2.1. Gamma-Emitting Radionuclides

The measurement was performed using a HPGe γ-spectrometer with Model 747 Lead Shield and Model BE5030 detector with its crystal diameter of 80.5 mm and thickness 31.0 mm (from Canberra Industries, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN, USA). Resolution (FWHM) at 5.9 keV (55Fe), 122 keV (57Co) and 1332 keV (60Co), are 0.500, 0.750 and 2.200 keV, respectively [10,11,12]. The multi-channel analyzer is Accuspec interface board coupling with microcomputer and conversion gain and memory are 8192. Genie-2000 software was used to analyze spectrum data.
Ash sample was packed tightly into plastic cylindrical containers (50/75 mm in diameter/height), weighed, measured for height, calculated for density and wrapped in PE bags. Before counting, the sample in air-tight plastic bag was kept for a period of 20 days to assure 226Ra in the samples to reach secular equilibrium with its daughter 222Rn [10,11,13]. The efficiency calibration of gamma-ray peaks was achieved by using S/N13000566 point source (the instrument equipped itself, Canberra Industries, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN, USA). The geometry of all counting samples was as the same as that of the standard samples. The counting time for all the samples was 24 h. The background counts (72 h) due to naturally occurring radionuclides in the environment around the detector were subtracted from that of each sample.

2.2.2. 90Sr

90Sr (-90Y) was measured by a di- (2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (HDEHP) extraction- β counting method according to the Technical Specification for Marine Radioactivity Monitoring [14]. The sample was counted using the gas-flow proportional alpha/beta counting system (LB4200, from Canberra Industries, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN, USA). The counting efficiency was measured by using the 90Sr-90Y standard reagent (National Institute of Metrology China, Beijing, China).

2.2.3. Gross Beta

Gross beta determination is not an absolute but relative radioactivity-determination, which is also known as the beta index [15,16] because anthropogenic radionuclides are mostly beta-emitting. In the early warning and monitoring of nuclear weapon tests and nuclear accidents, it is used as one of the signal and degree index of radioactive pollution, and also the first screening item for the radiological hygiene inspection process. Gross beta was counted on a thin layer of fine ash on a planchette by using gas-flow proportional alpha/beta counting system (LB4200, from Canberra Industries, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN, USA). The counting efficiency was measured by using KCl (high purity reagent) (National Institute of Metrology China, Beijing, China) [12,17].

3. Results

Results are shown in Table 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4. The specific activities of 238U, 228Th, 226Ra, 40K and gross beta in the organisms were 1.01 ± 0.16 (<0.05–5.20), 2.46 ± 0.13 (0.30–14.50), 1.15 ± 0.06(0.11–3.58), 57.9 ± 2.53 (11.1–148.0) Bq/kg, respectively. Except twitch grass, 228Th and 226Ra were significantly below their limited concentrations in foods [18]. For anthropogenic radionuclides, the specific activities of 137Cs and 90Sr were (<0.003–0.088) and (0.021–0.316) mBq/kg, respectively. Other anthropogenic radionuclides of 51Cr, 55Fe, 54Mn, 58Co, 60Co, 65Zn and 110mAg were below the minimum detectable activity, i.e., MDA. 137Cs and 90Sr were greatly lower than their limited concentrations in foods [18] and general action level [19] in the consumption food in China.

3.1. Terrestrial Organisms

3.1.1. Unhulled Rice from Dongping and Dagou (Crops, n = 2)

In the unhulled rice from Dongping, 238U, 226Ra, 228Th, 40K and gross beta were higher than those from Dagou. Gross beta came mainly from the natural 40K contribution and was at the same order of magnitude as that in Daya bay in 1980s [20]. In the unhulled rice, both 40K and gross beta were higher than those in the rice (i.e., husked rice) in Daya bay (before and after Daya bay Nuclear power plants, i.e., GNPP) [21,22]. In the unhulled rice from Dagou, 137Cs and 90Sr were higher than those from Dongping. 137Cs was slightly higher than that in the rice (i.e., husked rice) investigated before the GNPP, but lower than that in the rice before the GNPP [21,22]. 90Sr was slightly higher than that in the rice (i.e., husked rice) in the past investigations [20,21,22].

3.1.2. Sweet Potatoes from Dongping, Dagou and Huangjiangwei (Potatoes, n = 3)

The orders of the specific activities are as follows: 238U and 226Ra, Dongping > Dagou ≥ Huangjiangwei; 228Th, 40K and gross beta, Huangjiangwei > Dongping > Dagou; 137Cs, Dongping ≥ Dagou ≥ Huangjiangwei; 90Sr, Huangjiangwei > Dagou = Dongping. 228Th was the highest in Huangjiangwei because Huangjiangwei belongs to the HBRAYJB with a high-level thorium. Both 40K and gross beta were much similar to 228Th in three areas. 40K in Huangjiangwei was at the same level as that in Daya bay (1988–1990, Before the GNPP) [21], but was much lower than that in Dongping and Dagou. Both 137Cs and 90Sr were at the same order of magnitude as those in Day bay before the GNPP [21], but were lower than those in Sichuan province in 1985 [20].

3.1.3. Turnip and Bok-choy and Sugarcane (Vegetables/Fruits)

Turnip (n = 3)from Dongping, Dagou and Huangjiangwei—The orders of the specific activities are as follows: 238U, Huangjiangwei > Dagou and Dongping (below the MDA); 226Ra and 228Th, Huangjiangwei > Dongping > Dagou; 40K and gross beta, Dongping > Dagou > Huangjiangwei; 137Cs and 90Sr, Dagou > Dongping > Huangjiangwei. 40K was much higher than that in Daya bay (1988–1990, before GNPP) [21]. Gross beta was slightly higher than that in Daya bay before and after the GNPP [22]. 137Cs was at the same level as that before and after the GNPP [22,23]. 90Sr was slightly higher than that in Daya bay before the GNPP [22], but lower than those in Qinghai, Liaoning and Jiangsu provinces in China in 1985 [20].
Bok-choy (n = 1) from Dongping—Both 40K and gross beta were at the same level as those from Daya bay before and after the GNPP [21,22]. 137Cs was slightly higher than that in Daya bay before the GNPP, but at the same order of magnitude as those after the GNPP [22], and in Haiyang (2010–2012, before Haiyang NPP) (i.e., Haiyang NPP background (2011–2012) [24]. 90Sr was at the same level as that in Daya bay before GNPP [21,22], but was significantly lower than those in Ningxia, Shangdong and Sichan provinces in 1985 [20], in Daya bay after the GNPP [22] and in Haiyang (2010–2012, before Haiyang NPP) [24].
Sugarcane (n = 1) from Dagou—Gross beta was at the same order of magnitude as that in Daya bay in 1980s (7.4–89.1 Bq/kg, the mean value of 29.5 ± 0.6 Bq/kg) [20].

3.1.4. Twitch Grass from Dagou, Dongping and Huangjiangwei (Fodder, n = 3)

The orders of the specific activities are as follows: 238U, 40K, gross beta and 137Cs, Dagou > Dongping ≥ Huangjiangwei; 226Ra, Dongping > Dagou > Huangjiangwei; 228Th, Dagou > Huangjiangwei > Dongping; 90Sr, Huangjiangwei ≥ Dongping > Dagou. Gross beta in this study was lower than that in Daya bay before GNPP (1985, 1987) [20]. 137Cs was at the same level as that in Daya bay after GNPP (1999–2003) [23], and lower than that in Haiyang (2011–2012, before NPP) [24]. 90Sr was significantly lower than that in Haiyang (2011–2012, before NPP) [24].

3.1.5. Chicken and Freshwater Fish (Meat/Fish)

Chicken (n = 1)inDongping—Gross beta was significantly higher than that in Daya bay before and after GNPP [22]. 137Cs in chicken from Dongping was higher than that from Daya bay before and after GNPP (1988 to 2003) [22,23]. 90Sr was at the same level as those in Daya bay before GNPP (1988–1990) [21] and after GNPP (1994–2001) [22]. However, 90Sr was significantly lower than that before GNPP [22], but higher than those (1990–2003) [23] in Daya bay.
Freshwater fish (Tilapia) (n = 1)inDongping—Gross beta was at the same level as that in Daya bay before and after GNPP [22]. 137Cs in Dongping was lower than that in Daya bay after GNPP [22,23]. 90Sr was at the same level as that in Daya bay before and after GNPP (1990–2004) [21,22], but higher than the results (1990–2003) [23]. Meanwhile, 90Sr was significantly lower than that in bighead carp (0.095 Bq/kg) in Shangdong privence (1985) [25].

3.2. Marine Organisms

3.2.1. Sea Fish (n = 4) from Dongping, Zhapo and Xiachuan

The orders of the specific activities as follows: 238U, Dongping > Zhapo >> Xiachuan (below the MDA); 226Ra and 228Th, 40K, gross beta and 137Cs, Dongping > Xiachuan > Zhapo. For two sorts of fishes (sea and freshwater), 238U, 228Th, 226Ra in sea fish were much lower than those in freshwater fish. 40K and gross beta were slightly less than those in freshwater fish. 228Th and 226Ra in this study were significantly higher than those in west Daya bay (1993–2001) [26], and slightly lower than those in Daya bay (1997–1998) [27]. Furthermore, 228Th and 226Ra were at the same level as those in Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea (1970–1981) [28] and in Huludao, Lianyungang, Hangzhou bay [27]. 238U, 40K and gross beta in seafish were at the same level as those in the past investigations (1970–1981, 1993–2001 and 1997–1998) [26,27,28].
137Cs in sea fish was significantly higher than that freshwater fish (below the MDA). 90Sr was only analyzed in sea fish from Dongping in April 2012, 0.138 ± 0.008 Bq/kg. 137Cs was at the same level as that in Huludao, Lianyungang, Hangzhou bay and Daya bay (1997–1998) [27], but significantly lower than that in Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea (1970–1981) [28], in Daya bay before and after GNPP [23,26,29,30], and in Haiyang (2011–2012, before Haiyang NPP) [24]. In this study, 90Sr was higher than those in west Daya bay (1993–2001, after GNPP) [26] and in Haiyang (2011–2012, before Haiyang NPP) [24], but lower than those in Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea (1970–1981) [28] and in Daya bay before and after GNPP [29,30].

3.2.2. Sea Shrimp from Dongping, Zhapo and Xiachuan (n = 5)

The orders of the specific activities are as follows: 238U, Dongping > Xiachuan > Zhapo; 226Ra and 228Th, Dongping >> Zhapo > Xiachuan; 40K and gross beta, Dongping ≥ Zhapo > Xiachuan. In this study, 228Th was significantly higher than those in Huludao, Lianyungang, Qingdao and Hangzhou bay (1997–1998) [27], in west Daya bay (1993–2001) [26], because 228Th in Dongping was an order of magnitude higher than others. Gross beta was significantly lower than those in Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea (1970–1981) [28], in west Daya bay (1993–2001) [26]. 238U, 226Ra and 40K were at the same level as those in the past investigations (1970–1981, 1993–2001 and 1997–1998) [26,27,28,31].
For sea shrimp samples, 137Cs in Zhapo was the highest, followed by in Xiachuan and in Dongping. 90Sr was only analyzed in sea fish from Dongping in April 2012 (0.243 ± 0.011 Bq/kg). 137Cs (n = 5) was at the same level as those in the past investigations [23,24,26,27,28,29,31]. 90Sr (n = 1) was significantly lower than those in Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea (1970–1981) and Fujian province (1982) [28,31], and at the same level as that in Haiyang (2011–2012, before Haiyang NPP) [24], while higher than that in west Daya bay (1993–2001) [26].

3.2.3. Mollusks (e.g., Oysters, Mussels) from Dongping, Zhapo and Xiachuan (n = 5)

For the mollusics samples (n = 5, including oysters, mussels), the specific activities of 238U, 228Th and 226Ra, 40K and gross beta (n = 5) were 0.53 ± 0.06 (<0.12–0.93), 0.69 ± 0.03 (0.30–1.62), 0.66 ± 0.04 (0.11–2.37), 17.3 ± 0.7 (11.1–20.5) and 22.5 ± 2.0 (20.0–24.7) Bq/kg, respectively. For the oysters samples (n = 4), the specific activities of 238U, 228Th and 226Ra, 40K and gross beta were 0.40 ± 0.05 (<0.12–0.65), 0.69 ± 0.03 (0.30–0.64), 0.71 ± 0.04 (0.11–2.37), 18.0 ± 0.8 (13.7–20.5) and 22.4 ± 2.0 (20.0–24.7) Bq/kg, respectively. The orders of the specific activities are as follows: 238U, Xiachuan ≥ Zhapo > Dongping; 226Ra and 228Th, Dongping>> Xiachuan ≥ Zhapo; 40K and gross beta, Zhapo ≥ Dongping ≥ Xiachuan. In the study, 238U and 228Th in the mussels’ sample (n = 1) were higher than those in the oysters (n = 4), while 40K and gross beta were lower than those in the oysters. 228Th was significantly higher than that in Pearl hell in west Daya bay (1993–2001) [26], and significantly lower than those in shellfish in Huludao, Qingdao and Daya bay (1997–1998) [27]. 238U, 226Ra, 40K and gross beta were at the same level as those in the past investigations (1970–1981, 1993–2001 and 1997–1998) [26,27,28,31].
137Cs was only detected (0.020 ± 0.010 and 0.007 ± 0.002 Bq/kg) in the oysters from Dongping and Zhaopo. 90Sr was only analyzed in the oysters sample in Dongping (0.118 ± 0.005 Bq/kg). For the oysters samples (n = 4) and the mollusic samples (n = 5), 137Cs was slightly lower than those in the past investigations [24,27,28,29,31]; 90Sr (n = 1) was significantly higher than those in the past investigations [24,27,28,29,30,31].

4. Discussion

4.1. Differences and Comparisons of the Organismal Species

There were some differences between each radionuclide in various species organisms because of their habitats and environment. For natural U and Th series, 228Th belonging Th-series was generally higher than 238U and 226Ra in the same terrestrial specie organisms. The previous results suggested that there were two granite-hill areas with high background radiation (total area of ~540 km2), viz, Tongyou and Dong-anling (three villages of Yong’an, Huan’an and Liang’an). The high background radiation ought to originate from the weathered granite made up of fine monazite, which are washed continually and deposited into the surrounding basin region [1]. Radioactive thorium was constantly released from the fine granite rock under various geological process (tectonic process, water-rock processes and wind erosion), which will inevitably result in the kind of thorium-rich soil in Hongjiangwei. Many results also indicated that the HBRAYJ was mainly caused by the high concentration of 228Th in the hilly soils (the mean value of 206 ± 92 Bqkg−1) [2,32,33,34,35]. In soil in HBRAYJ, 238U, 228Th and 226Ra were three times as high as those in CA [36], while 232Th, 228Th and 230Th were generally 8.7, 7.7 and 9.2 times as high as those in CA, respectively [37,38,39]. In addition, 222Rn and 220Rn daughters were three times higher than those in CA and the mean concentration in China [40].
In Huangjiangwei, 228Th and 90Sr in sweet potato were significantly higher than those from Dagou and Dongping due to those sweet potato’s habits and environments. Sweet potato is a dicotyledonous plant, whose roots are vegetable. Sweet potato root can directly contact the soil and absorbs nutrients to accelerate the enrichment of thorium and calcium-like strontium. Furthermore, 40K in sweet potatoes also was higher than other terrestrial plants. The mean value of 40K spatial activities in sweet potato was 1.5 times as that in unhulled rice (n = 2), and about two times than those in turnip (n = 3), twitch grass (n = 3) and bok-choy (n = 1). Gross beta in the terrestrial organisms was greatly similar as 40K, because gross beta mainly contributes to natural 40K. Similarly, turnip is also root-vegetable so that 228Th was also the highest in turnip in Huangjiangwei.
238U, 228Th, 226Ra in Tilapia collected from Dagou were much higher than those in sea fish collected three areas (Dongping, Zhapo and Xiachuan). This may depend on Tilapia’s biological habits. Since Tilapia usually lives in freshwater as well as in salt water, i.e., river, lake, marsh and sea. Tilapia is a highly suitable fish for farming since it is fast growing and very tolerant in regards to water conditions (with less dissolved oxygen). Most Tilapia are omnivorous and feed on plants and debris in the water. Furthermore, 40K and gross beta were slightly less than those in freshwater fish. The mean value of 90Sr in seafish was 0.138 ± 0.008 Bq/kg, which was about one-second of that in freshwater fish.
228Th in the sea shrimp was greatly higher than that in sea fish and mollusic samples. Since sea shrimp belongs to bentonic organism in the sea bed, and can directly intake the plankton or benthic organisms in the seawater-sediment interface to accelerate the thorium enrichment. In sea shrimp in three areas (Dongping, Zhapo and Xiachuan), natural radionuclides-238U (0.63 ± 0.08 Bq/kg), 228Th (14.35 ± 0.36 Bq/kg), 226Ra (2.33 ± 0.08 Bq/kg) from Dongping were much higher than those from other two areas (Zhapo and Xiachuan). This may be closely related to river input into sea, including Moyang River and Shouchang river. Similarly, the aforementioned mechanism of HBRAYJ were also occurred. Those rich-thorium soil are washed by rain into rivers and eventually into the sea area near Doping. Thus, the uranium concentration (0.14–0.36μg/L, the mean value of 0.19 μg/L) in the water of Moyang River was much higher than that of other rivers in Guangdong Province [41]. That may be one reason that 228Th in the sea shrimp in our study was significantly higher than those in past investigations [26,27].
Natural radionuclides of 238U, 228Th, 226Ra and 40K in the organisms were originated from the surrounding soils. 228Th was significantly higher than 238U and 226Ra of natural U series in organisms due to the rich-Th soils in the HBRAYJ. For anthropogenic radionuclides, the YJNNP is not yet operational and could not have released anthropogenic pollutants. 137Cs and 90Sr should originated from global fallout. Even though our survey was conducted after in Marth 2011, we think that the effect from the FNA on the organisms in our study also very limited and negligible.

4.2. Radiological Risk Assessment

In the plants, the radionuclides are mainly derived from soil, water and some absorption through the leaves. Similarly, the radionuclides in the terrestrial and/or marine animals should originate from their ingested food/water and some absorption through the skin or respiratory systems [42,43]. The radioactive contamination in organisms depends on three main factors: (1) the duration of contact with the contaminated media, e.g., food and water, soil/bottom mud, atmosphere, (2) the organisms concentration ability and (3) the organisms’ maturity. We could not evaluate the influences of the first two factors because of the mobility and inter-individual differences of the organisms, and because of the lack of some data. Thus, it is difficult to determine the mechanisms underlying the contamination levels in various species. The internal doses from ingesting the organisms were easily assessed. Assuming that the entire consumption each year was solely of the species in this study, the committed effective internal doses from the ingestion is estimated by the following equation:
I n - D o s e = ( i n D c i A i ) · C a · Y
where the In-Dose is the internal doses from ingesting the organisms, Sievert (Sv); i is the radionuclide, e.g., 238U, 226Ra and so on; Dc is the radionuclide–specific committed effective dose coefficients for adult human ingestion, it converts the energy emitted from the ingested radioactivity into a radionuclide-specific, committed effective dose to adult humans, with units of Sv [44,45]; Ca is the annual per capita consumption rate, kg; Y is the percentage of the edible portion of the organism, %. As shown in Table 2, the assumed annual per capita consumption rates and the In-Dose for all types of species ranged from 1.81 to 136.49 μSv/a. For all organisms, the In-Dose from unhulled rice is the highest, yet the In-Dose from sugarcane is the lowest, less than one-fiftieth of that from unhulled rice. For the food chain between grass-cow-milk, we may assume that 250-kg cow can eat ~25 kg/day of twitch grass and then produce ~17.5 kg/day of milk in this study. If the conversion rate for each radionuclide is 100%, and the Ca for milk to humans is ~15 kg/a, the In-Dose is very low, only ~0.12 ± 0.01 nSv/a (0.15–0.22 nSv/a).
Figure 5 shows results of the assessed dose contributions of each radionuclide. The percentage of natural 40K-internal doses ranged from 16.8% to 67.5% (the mean value of 43.8%). In addition, 226Ra (from 16.9 to 59.1%, the mean values of 36.1%), 228Th (from 3.5% to 49.3%, the mean values of 15.5%) were another two main contributors. The internal doses from natural 40K were ~40 to ~1500 times as high as those from anthropogenic radionuclides (137Cs+90Sr).
The health risks resulting from a radiation dose are known for humans, but there are some large uncertainties to infer risks to health from such low dose at present [46]. Statistically significant elevations in cancer risk are observed at doses >100 mSv, and epidemiological studies cannot identify significant elevations in risk well below these levels [47]. For adult humans, the detriment-unadjusted nominal risk coefficient for fatal cancer is 4.1–4.8% per Sv of radiation dose [48]. Here, we consider additional cancer risk to humans due to the consumption. Even if humans consumed only the species in this study instead of other food for an entire year, the greatest increase in the probability of fatal cancer from anthropogenic radionuclides would be 0.000432% (0.000009–0.000653%). The effects of low levels of ionizing radiation on humans remain uncertainties, but our result shows clearly that these internal doses are very low. For the most exposed segments of human populations, this resulting cancer risks are far below levels that should cause concern.

5. Conclusions

Nuclear power is an effective way to achieve the goal of carbon dioxide emission reduction and realize the coordinated development of energy, economy and environment (3E system). At present, the YJNPP operation ensures energy needs and promotes sustainable economic development in Yangjiang and the adjacent areas. However, the YJNPP built in high-level areas is one of the few examples in the world. On the premise of ensuring the nuclear power and economic development, it is important to understand the radioactive level and the potential radiation risk systematically and scientifically. Our results suggested that the radioactive levels were too low to affect human health. There are differences in the concentrations of radionuclides in different species of organisms, even in the same species from various habitats. The distribution of natural radionuclides in the organisms were associated with the living environments. The anthropogenic radionuclides still originated from global fallout. Our results are useful for understanding the effects of low dose radiation on human in the HBRAYJ at present. It is useful to provide some basic data and assess the radiological risk from the HBRAYJ and YJNNP in future. In particular, it is also essential for understanding the effects of low dose radiation on non-human species in future.

Author Contributions

D.L.: Analysis, Data processing, Diagram and Writing. Z.J.: Diagram, Writing and Editing. L.Z. and F.Z.: Sample pretreatment and Analysis. P.Z.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Fund Projects of China (41776091), by Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean of China (201505005-6), and by Research Fund Program of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Emergency Test for Dangerous Chemicals (KF2018004).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of South China Sea Environment Monitoring Center, SOA, China (EAE2011-001, Date: 10 March 2011; EAE2012-001, Date: 15 February 2012).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in insert article here.

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by National Natural Science Fund Projects of China (41776091), by Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean of China (201505005-6), and by Research Fund Program of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Emergency Test for Dangerous Chemicals (KF2018004). The authors thank Qianlin Liang, Jiazhen Zha and Hongbiao Zhang for their help in the samples’ pretreatment and the anonymous reviewers are also appreciated for their valuable comments that have greatly improved the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Background Radiation Research Group, P.R. China (BRRG). Health Survey in High Background Radiation Areas in China. Science 1920, 209, 877–880. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yuan, Y.; Shen, H.; Zhou, Z. Determination of environmental radiation and accumulated exposure in high background areas. Chin. J. Radiol. Med. Prot. 1982, 2, 16–20. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Yuan, Y. Radiation Doses to propulation arising from inhalation of 222Rn, 220Rn and their Dacay products. In High Background Radiation Research in Yangjiang China; Atomic Energy Press: Beijing, China, 1996; pp. 111–119. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Wei, L.; Sugahara, T. Recent advances of ‘Epidemiological study in high background radiation area in Yangjiang, China’. Int. Congr. Ser. 2002, 1236, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, M.G.; Zhou, P.; Zhao, F.; Li, D.M.; Zhao, L.; Zheng, Y.L.; Cai, W.X.; Fang, H.D.; Lou, Q.S. The concentration of γ radionuclides in surface marine sediments from Yangjiang nuclear power plant and its adjacent sea area, South China Sea. Mar. Environ. Sci. 2018, 37, 43–47. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang, X.; Shangguan, Z.; Zhao, F. Assessment of radiological impact on the marine organisms near Yanjiang nuclear power plant. J. Trop. Oceanogr. 2009, 28, 35–40. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng, F.; Lin, Q.; Zhou, R.; Qin, L.; Wang, J.; Li, Q. Investigation of 3H activity concentrations in environmental waster surrounding Taishan and Yangjiang NPPs. Radiat. Prot. Lett. 2015, 35, 6–11. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Harb, S.; Michel, R. Uptake-of U-and Th-series radionuclides by cereal crops in Upper Egypt. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 2009, 20, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  9. State Oceanic Administration of People’s Rupbulic of China (SOA of P.R. China). HY/T 003·8-1991. Specifications of Oceanographic Survey-Determination of Radionuclide, P.R. China; China Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, D.; Zhou, P.; Chen, J.; Fang, H.; Huang, C.; Zhang., Y. Sedimentary process effects on multi-radionuclide depth profiles in Daya Bay sediments. Mar. Sci. Bull. 2013, 23 (Suppl. 1), 108–114. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhao, F.; Wu, M.; Zhou, P.; Li, D.; Zhao, L.; Zheng, Y.; Cai, W.; Fang, H.; Huang, C. Radionuclides in surface sediments from the Huangmaohai Estuary, Guanghai Bay and its adjacent sea area of the South China Sea. J. Trop. Oceanogr. 2015, 34, 77–82. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou, P.; Li, D.; Li, H.; Fang, H.; Huang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, L.; Zhou, J.; Wang, H.; et al. Distribution of radionuclides in a marine sediment core off the water spout of the nuclear power plants in Daya Bay, north eastern South China Sea. J. Environ. Radioact. 2015, 145, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, G.; Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Chen, M. Sedimentary process study of Qingdao nearshore traced using multi-radionuclide approach. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007, 7, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Environmental Protection Division (EPD), State Oceanic Administration of People’s Rupbulic of China (SOA of P.R. China). The Technical Specification for Marine Radioactivity Monitoring Issued by the EPD, SOA of P.R. China; EPD, SOA of P.R. China: Beijing, China, 2011.
  15. Rice, E.W.; Baird, R.B.; Eaton, R.A.; Clesceri, L.S. 7110 Gross alpha and gross beta radioactivity (Total, suspended, and dissolved). In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhao, L.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, H.B.; Li, D.M.; Huang, C.G.; Fang, H.D.; Cai, W.X.; Chen, J.H. The radioactivity level of gross beta in sea water near Daya Bay Nuclear Power Stations from 2005 to 2010. J. Trop. Oceanogr. 2013, 32, 107–112. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, P.; Li, D.; Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Zhao, F.; Zheng, Y.; Fang, H.; Lou, Q.; Cai, W. Radioactive status of seawater and its assessment in the northeast South China Sea and the Luzon Strait and its adjacent areas from 2011 to 2014. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 131, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. The Department of Health of P.R. China. GB 14882-1994. Limited Concentrations of Radioactive Materials in Foods; China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  19. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China. GB 18871-2002. Basic Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources; China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shang, Z.; Liang, G.; Hou, L.; Li, X. Radioactive background investigation of the surrounding agricultural environment before Daya nuclear power plant operation. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Radiation Protection in China, Shenzhen, China, 1 November 1998; pp. 1–8. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin, B.; Zhou, Z. Investigation of 90Sr activity level of Daya bay coastal areas in Guangdong. Radiat. Prot. 1995, 15, 129–137. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, Z.; Deng, F.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q. Environment Radioactivity Level around Daya Bay NPP. Radiat. Prot. Bull. 2003, 23, 25–30. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Ji, C.; Zhang, D. Results and analysis of environmental radiation monitoring at GNPS (1994–2003). Radiat. Prot. 2004, 24, 173–191. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, X. Investigation on Biological Strontium-90 and Cesium-137 in Environmental Radiation Background of Shandong Haiyang Nuclear Power Plant, and the Impact of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident; Suzhou University: Suzhou, China, 2015. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, J.; Zhu, H.; Han, P. Chinese Food Radioactivity and Its Induced Internal Dose; China Environment Press: Beijing, China, 1989; p. 61. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Y.; Lin, Q.; Chen, Z.; Deng, F. Biological radioactivity levels in the sea area of west Daya bay, Chinese Nuclear Society. In Proceedings of the national symposium on radioactive effluents and environmental monitoring and evaluation in China, Hangzhou, China, 24 November 2003; pp. 455–458. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  27. Tang, S.; Shang, Z. Radiation Investigation in near Coast Marine Environment in China. Nucl. Saf. 2005, 2, 21–30. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, S.; Wu, F.; Zhu, H.; Sun, F.; Liu, Q.; Yang, W. Health assessment of radioactivity level in the coastal area of Bohai and Yellow sea. In Radiation Levels in the Coastal Areas in P.R. China Beijing; Li, S., Wu, F., Zhu, H., Eds.; China Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 1987; pp. 1–14. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, G.; Zhou, C. 137Cs contents in the marine organisms, seawater and sediment in Dayawan before and after the nuclear power plant operation. Mar. Environ. Sci. 1998, 17, 7–10. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, G.; Zhou, C. Contents and behavior characteristics of 137Cs and 90Sr in vrarious mediums of Daya Bay. J. Oceanogr. Taiwain Strait 2000, 19, 261–268. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, X.; Weng, D.; Zhang, J. Radiation levels in the coastal areas of Fujian province. In Radiation Levels in the Coastal Areas in P.R. China Beijing; Li, S., Wu, F., Zhu, H., Eds.; China Ocean Press: Beijing, China, 1987; pp. 113–124. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  32. Guo, Q.; Sun, J.; Zhuo, W. Potential of High Thoron Exposure in China. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2000, 37, 716–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yuan, Y.; Morishima, H.; Shen, H.; Kotama, K.; Wei, L.; Sugahara, T. Measurment of 222Rn, 220Rn and their products in high background radiation area in Yangjing. Chin. J. Radiol. Heath 2000, 9, 1–3. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Yuan, Y.; Morishima, H.; Shen, H.; Kotama, K.; Wei, L.; Sugahara, T. Estimation of doses to the residents arising from in halation of Rn-22, Tn-220 and their products in high background radiation area of Yangjing. Chin. J. Radiol. Heath 2002, 11, 65–68, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  35. Yuan, Y.; Morishima, H.; Shen, H.; Kotama, K.; Wei, L.; Sugahara, T. The estimation of doses to the inhalation from natural radiation source in high background radiation area of Yangjing, China. Chin. J. Radiol. Heath 2004, 13, 1–7. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  36. Xu, N.; Hu, W.; Zhao, J. Determination of uranium, thorium, radium-226, potassium-40 in soil of high background area. Chin. J. Radiol. Med. Prot. 1982, 2, 40–44. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  37. Wei, Z.; Hou, Q.; Lv, H.; Dong, Z. The contents and their depth distribution of thorium nuclides in the soil Guangdong high background area and the control area. Chin. J. Radiol. Med. Prot. 1985, 5, 93–95. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  38. Luo, D. The measurement of radionuclides’ concentration and exposure rate in the soil in Guangdong high background area using the field exposure spectrometry. Chin. J. Radiol. Med. Prot. 1985, 5, 90–93. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  39. Luo, D.; Li, J.; Huang, G.; Lai, X.; Guan, Z.; Weng, S. The contents and their depth distribution of radionuclides in the soil Guangdong high background area and the control area. Chin. J. Radiol. Med. Prot. 1985, 5, 95–97. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen, B.; Guo, Q.; Sun, Q.; Zou, J. A survey on indoor 222Rn progeny in high background radiation area of Yangjiang, China. Radiat. Prot. 2006, 26, 50–56. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  41. Zeng, Q.; Zheng, W. Investigation of natural radioactivity level of the waters in Guanodong province. Radiat. Prot. 1995, 15, 218–221, 234, (In Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
  42. Men, W.; Deng, F.; He, J.; Yu, W.; Wang, F.; Li, Y.; Lin, F.; Lin, J.; Lin, L.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Radioactive impacts on nekton species in the Northwest Pacific and humans more than one year after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 144, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Buesseler, K.; Aoyama, M.; Fukasawa, M. Impacts of the Fukushima nuclear power plants on marine radioactivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 245, 9931–9935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. ICRP (International Commission on Radiation Protection). Age-dependent dose to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 5 compilation of ingestion and inhalation dose coefficients. Ann. ICRP 1996, 41, 2807. [Google Scholar]
  45. ICRP (International Commission on Radiation Protection). Compendium of Dose Coefficients Based on ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 2012, 41 (Suppl. 1), 1–130. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fisher, N.S.; Beaugelin-Seiller, K.; Hinton, T.G.; Baumann, Z.; Madigan, D.J.; Garnier-Laplace, J. Evaluation of radiation doses and associated risk from the Fukushima nuclear accident to marine biota and human consumers of seafood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10670–10675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. UNSCEAR. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation 2010. In the Fifty-Seventh Session, Includes Scientific Report: Summary of Low-Dose Radiation Effects on Health; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  48. ICRP (International Commission on Radiation Protection). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann. ICRP 2007, 37, 2–4. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Sampling stations in Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
Figure 1. Sampling stations in Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
Ijerph 18 08767 g001
Figure 2. 238U, 228Th and 226Ra in the organisms collected from Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
Figure 2. 238U, 228Th and 226Ra in the organisms collected from Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
Ijerph 18 08767 g002
Figure 3. 40K and gross beta in the organisms collected from Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
Figure 3. 40K and gross beta in the organisms collected from Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
Ijerph 18 08767 g003
Figure 4. 137Cs and 90Sr in the organisms collected from Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
Figure 4. 137Cs and 90Sr in the organisms collected from Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
Ijerph 18 08767 g004
Figure 5. Dose contributions of each radionuclide.
Figure 5. Dose contributions of each radionuclide.
Ijerph 18 08767 g005
Table 1. 238U, 228Th, 226Ra, 40K, gross beta, 137Cs, 90Sr in the organisms from Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
Table 1. 238U, 228Th, 226Ra, 40K, gross beta, 137Cs, 90Sr in the organisms from Yangjiang and the adjacent areas.
SpeciesSortsDateNatural RadionuclidesGross BetaAnthropogenic Radionuclides
M/D/Y238U228Th226Ra40K 137Cs90Sr
Terrestrial organisms from Dongping, Yangjiang city
Unhulled riceCrops12/3/20122.34 ± 0.683.70 ± 0.323.58 ± 0.1966.3 ± 2.875.8 ± 2.30.023 ± 0.0170.096 ± 0.009
Sweet potatoPotatoes12/3/20120.87 ± 0.140.87 ± 0.061.26 ± 0.0785.6 ± 3.892.2 ± 3.10.043 ± 0.0090.058 ± 0.005
Bok-choyVegetables/fruits12/3/20120.40 ± 0.050.32 ± 0.020.71 ± 0.0266.9 ± 2.872.1 ± 0.60.013 ± 0.0050.041 ± 0.004
Turnip12/3/2012<0.090.50 ± 0.030.60 ± 0.0379.5 ± 3.583.3 ± 3.20.026 ± 0.0060.058 ± 0.004
Twitch grassFodder12/3/20122.17 ± 0.601.37 ± 0.172.98 ± 0.17122 ± 5.6113.2 ± 6.70.053 ± 0.0220.192 ± 0.014
ChickenMeat/fish/shrimp12/3/20120.77 ± 0.090.92 ± 0.040.69 ± 0.0255.3 ± 2.375.1 ± 4.70.020 ± 0.0020.021 ± 0.018
Marine organisms from Dongping, Yangjiang city
Sea fishMeat/fish /shrimp8/5/2011<0.380.72 ± 0.040.12 ± 0.0167.9 ± 2.881.5 ± 8.20.054 ± 0.008-
4/23/20120.52 ± 0.131.40 ± 0.050.68 ± 0.2853.1 ± 2.254.8 ± 2.70.018 ± 0.0030.138 ± 0.008
Sea shrimp8/5/20110.45 ± 0.1214.5 ± 0.62.16 ± 0.0547.9 ± 2.051.8 ± 5.20.015 ± 0.005-
8/23/20120.81 ± 0.0314.2 ± 0.112.50 ± 0.1016.4 ± 0.723.9 ± 1.2<0.0050.243 ± 0.011
Oysters8/5/20110.55 ± 0.050.52 ± 0.020.20 ± 0.0117.7 ± 0.724.2 ± 2.5<0.004-
4/23/2012<0.120.64 ± 0.042.37 ± 0.1320.5 ± 0.920.0 ± 1.00.020 ± 0.0100.118 ± 0.005
Terrestrial organisms sampled from Dagou, Yangjiang city
Unhulled riceCrops12/3/2012<0.200.64 ± 0.080.98 ± 0.0740.0 ± 1.858.1 ± 1.90.035 ± 0.0130.119 ± 0.009
Sweet potatoPotatoes12/3/20120.41 ± 0.120.76 ± 0.060.81 ± 0.05123.2 ± 5.5127 ± 5.40.040 ± 0.0090.107 ± 0.010
TurnipVegetables/fruits12/3/2012<0.050.44 ± 0.040.21 ± 0.0166.4 ± 3.071.8 ± 2.10.033 ± 0.0030.045 ± 0.003
Twitch grassFodder12/3/20125.20 ± 0.404.80 ± 0.392.79 ± 0.17148 ± 6.7143.0 ± 7.20.088 ± 0.0300.158 ± 0.016
TilapiaMeat/fish/shrimp12/3/20121.18 ± 0.143.44 ± 0.141.78 ± 0.0661.6 ± 2.660.1 ± 3.1<0.0330.316 ± 0.025
Organisms sampled from Huangjiangwei, Yangjiang city
Sweet potatoPotatoes12/3/20120.39 ± 0.041.02 ± 0.050.76 ± 0.0549.3 ± 2.245.4 ± 2.30.037 ± 0.0070.058 ± 0.005
TurnipVegetables/fruits12/3/20120.51 ± 0.071.22 ± 0.070.81 ± 0.0461.5 ± 2.770.1 ± 2.0<0.0030.028 ± 0.003
Sugarcane12/3/20120.33 ± 0.110.66 ± 0.060.49 ± 0.0339.1 ± 1.839.2 ± 1.50.048 ± 0.0110.030 ± 0.002
Twitch grassFodder12/3/20121.56 ± 0.213.72 ± 0.292.39 ± 0.14120 ± 5.4112.4 ± 5.6<0.0130.198 ± 0.15
Marine organisms sampled from Zhapo, Yangjiang city
Sea fishMeat/fish/shrimp8/5/20110.29 ± 0.070.45 ± 0.030.15 ± 0.0140.8 ± 1.745.6 ± 4.60.015 ± 0.005-
Sea shrimp8/5/2011<0.204.01 ± 0.160.62 ± 0.0225.7 ± 1.132.5 ± 3.30.008 ± 0.002-
8/24/20120.29 ± 0.072.34 ± 0.100.51 ± 0.0236.4 ± 1.536.9 ± 3.70.019 ± 0.003-
Oysters8/5/20110.62 ± 0.050.30 ± 0.020.11 ± 0.0120.0 ± 0.824.7 ± 2.50.007 ± 0.002-
Marine organisms sampled from Xiachuan, Jiangmen city
Sea fishMeat/fish/shrimp8/5/2011<0.0.350.73 ± 0.50.26 ± 0.0256.0 ± 2.459.8 ± 6.00.016 ± 0.009-
Sea shrimp8/5/20110.43 ± 0.092.08 ± 0.090.44 ± 0.0220.7 ± 0.923.4 ± 2.40.011 ± 0.003-
Oysters8/5/20110.65 ± 0.050.38 ± 0.020.14 ± 0.0113.7 ± 0.620.7 ± 2.0<0.007-
Mussels4/24/20120.93 ± 0.091.62 ± 0.070.48 ± 0.0211.1 ± 0.521.2 ± 2.1<0.014-
Note: “-” represents the sample was not analyzed. 238U, 228Th, 226Ra, 40K, 137Cs, 90Sr and gross β activity are in the unit of Bq/kg.
Table 2. Committed effective doses from ingesting food to humans.
Table 2. Committed effective doses from ingesting food to humans.
Food Sorts238U (Bq/kg)228Th (Bq/kg)226Ra (Bq/kg)40K (Bq/kg)137Cs (Bq/kg)90Sr (Bq/kg)Ca b (kg/a)Y (%)In-Dose d
(μSv/a)
DC (nSv/Bq) a45.072.02806.213.028.0
Unhulled rice
(n = 3)
<9.00–105.30
53.78 ± 30.6
46.08–266.40
156.24 ± 14.40
274.40–1002.40
638.4 ± 36.4
248.0–411.1
329.5 ± 14.3
0.299–0.455
00.377 ± 0.195
2.688–3.332
3.010 ± 0.252
112.26843.77–136.49
90.13 ± 7.33
Sweet Potatoes
(n = 3)
17.55–39.15
25.05 ± 4.50
54.72–73.44
63.60 ± 4.08
212.80–352.80
264.13 ± 15.87
305.7–763.8
533.4 ± 23.8
0.481–0.559
0.520 ± 0.108
1.624–2.996
2.081 ± 0.187
47.610028.22–58.68
42.31 ± 2.31
Turnip (n = 3)<2.25–22.95
8.18 ± 3.15
31.68–87.84
51.84 ± 3.36
58.80–226.80
151.20 ± 7.47
381.3–492.9
428.6 ± 19.0
<0.039–0.429
0.260 ± 0.059
0.784–1.624
1.223 ± 0.093
38.710018.32–32.22
24.82 ± 1.28
Bok-choy (n = 1)18.00 ± 2.2523.04 ± 1.44198.80 ± 5.60414.78 ± 17.360.17 ± 0.071.15 ± 0.1138.710025.38 ± 1.04
Chicken (n = 1)34.65 ± 4.0566.24 ± 2.88193.20 ± 5.60342.86 ± 14.260.26 ± 0.030.59 ± 0.5010603.83 ± 0.16
Freshwater Fish (n = 1) Tilapia53.10 ± 6.30247.68 ± 10.08498.40 ± 16.80381.92 ± 16.12<0.4298.85 ± 0.70366025.70 ± 1.08
Sea Fish
(n = 4)
13.05–23.40
14.12 ± 4.50
32.40–100.80
59.40 ± 11.16
33.60–190.40
84.70 ± 22.40
253.0–421.0
337.6 ± 14.1
0.195–0.702
0.335 ± 0.081
3.864 ± 0.22436607.26–15.99
10.80 ± 1.13
Sea/freshwater
Fish (n = 5)
13.05–53.10
14.87 ± 5.10
32.40–247.68
97.06 ± 10.94
33.60–498.40
167.44 ± 21.28
253.0–421.0
346.5 ± 14.5
<0.429–0.702
0.289 ± 0.081
3.864–8.848
6.356 ± 0.462
36607.26–26.56
13.66 ± 1.13
Seashrimp
(n = 5)
9.00–36.45
18.27 ± 3.49
149.76–1044.0
534.67 ± 15.26
123.20–700.00
348.88 ± 11.76
101.7–297.0
182.4 ± 7.7
0.104–0.247
0.141 ± 0.042
6.804 ± 0.30818604.22–22.44
11.71 ± 0.41
Oysters
(n = 4)
24.75–29.25
20.81 ± 2.25
21.60–46.08
33.12 ± 1.80
30.80–663.60
197.40 ± 11.20
109.7–127.1
111.4 ± 4.7
0.091–0.260
0.106 ± 0.078
3.304 ± 0.140181001.79–9.36
3.95 ± 0.22
Mussels (n = 1)41.85 ± 4.05116.64 ± 5.04134.40 ± 5.6068.82 ± 3.10<0.05/ c181003.91 ± 0.19
Mollusic(Oysters/mussels) (n = 5)24.75–41.85
25.02 ± 2.70
21.60–116.64
49.82 ± 2.45
30.80–663.60
184.80 ± 10.08
68.8–127.1
102.9 ± 4.3
0.091–0.260
0.945 ± 0.07
3.304 ± 0.140181001.61–10.29
3.96 ± 0.21
Sugarcane(n = 1)14.85 ± 4.9547.52 ± 4.32137.20 ± 8.40242.42 ± 11.160.62 ± 0.140.84 ± 0.065.1801.81 ± 0.12
Twitchgrass
(n = 3)
70.20–234.00
133.95 ± 18.15
98.64–345.60
237.36 ± 20.40
669.20–834.40
761.60 ± 44.80
744.0–917.6
806.0 ± 36.6
0.689–1.144
0.917 ± 0.338
4.424–5.544
5.115 ± 0.420
- e- e0.00015–0.00022
0.00018 ± 0.00001
Note: a Dcradionuclide–specific committed effective dose coefficients for adult human ingestion [45]. b the annual per capita consumption rate (i.e., Ca) are for all types of species combined, whereas the dose calculations conservatively assumed the entire consumption consisted solely of each species. Assumed exposure time is 50a for adults. c Lack of data. d In-Dose, the internal doses from ingesting the food to humans from the personal annual consumption assessed. e the method estimated see Section 4.2.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, D.; Jiang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Zhao, F.; Zhou, P. Assessment of Radioactivity Level in the Terrestrial and Marine Organisms in Yangjiang and Its Adjacent Areas (China). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168767

AMA Style

Li D, Jiang Z, Zhao L, Zhao F, Zhou P. Assessment of Radioactivity Level in the Terrestrial and Marine Organisms in Yangjiang and Its Adjacent Areas (China). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(16):8767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Dongmei, Zhongchen Jiang, Li Zhao, Feng Zhao, and Peng Zhou. 2021. "Assessment of Radioactivity Level in the Terrestrial and Marine Organisms in Yangjiang and Its Adjacent Areas (China)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 16: 8767. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168767

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop