Next Article in Journal
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Work-Related Stress among Rescue Workers in Traumatic Mass-Casualty Disasters
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Risk of Respiratory-Related Healthcare Visits Associated with Wildfire Smoke Exposure in Children 0–18 Years Old: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding the Impact of Perfluorinated Compounds on Cardiovascular Diseases and Their Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 16
10.3390/ijerph18168347
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Geography as a Determinant of Health: Health Services Utilization of Pediatric Respiratory Illness in a Canadian Province

by
Shehzad Kassam
1,
Jesus Serrano-Lomelin
2,
Anne Hicks
3,
Susan Crawford
4,
Jeffrey A. Bakal
5 and
Maria B. Ospina
2,*
1
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
2
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
3
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
4
Alberta Perinatal Health Program, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
5
Provincial Research Data Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T6G 2C8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(16), 8347; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168347
Submission received: 20 July 2021 / Revised: 29 July 2021 / Accepted: 3 August 2021 / Published: 6 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental, Occupational, and Smoke-Related Exposure: Impact on Respiratory Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Respiratory diseases contribute to high healthcare utilization rates among children. Although social inequalities play a major role in these conditions, little is known about the impact of geography as a determinant of health, particularly with regard to the difference between rural and urban centers. A regional geographic analysis was conducted using health repository data on singleton births between 2005 and 2010 in Alberta, Canada. Data were aggregated according to regional health sub-zones in the province and standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) were determined for eight respiratory diseases (asthma, influenza, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, croup, pneumonia, and other upper and other lower respiratory tract infections). The results indicate that there are higher rates of healthcare utilization in northern compared to southern regions and in rural and remote regions compared to urban ones, after accounting for both material and social deprivation. Geography plays a role in discrepancies of healthcare utilization for pediatric respiratory diseases, and this can be used to inform the provision of health services and resource allocation across various regions.

1. Introduction

Respiratory illnesses are one of the leading causes of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations among children under the age of five in Canada [1]. This results in a significant burden to individuals and families, as well as the healthcare system. These illnesses include infectious diseases, such as pneumonia, influenza, and bronchiolitis, as well as inflammatory diseases, such as asthma.
The etiology and risk factors associated with pediatric respiratory illnesses are multifaceted, and while the biomedical model is well-established in terms of understanding these conditions, exploration of the social determinants of health (SDOHs) is more recent. SDOHs are the social, economic, and cultural factors that impact health at the individual and population levels [2]. Several studies have highlighted that low socio-economic status (SES) and low education attainment are strongly associated with asthma and other respiratory diseases [3,4,5]. In addition, housing conditions are a considerable determinant for these diseases because of overcrowding, the need for major repairs, and compromised indoor air quality [6,7,8,9,10,11].
The place where people live, as a determinant of health, has not been thoroughly researched in terms of pediatric respiratory illnesses in Canada. Health geographic analyses explore the spatial heterogeneity of diseases and provide information not only about disease distribution, but about also the factors and mechanisms associated with the risk of infection or development of a disease [12,13,14]. Given the extensive land area of Canada, evaluating geographic variability and its association with health can offer insight into unique challenges that affect communities most impacted by this determinant, specifically those living in rural and remote regions [12].
Rural communities face significant barriers in terms of lack of access to health services; patients often require substantial transportation to receive appropriate care. As a result, many individuals may delay seeking support until their condition deteriorates and, ultimately, require hospitalization [15,16]. With regard to respiratory diseases specifically, children in rural communities are exposed to more environmental factors that can precipitate or worsen conditions, creating disparities across the urban–rural gradient [17]. These include higher rates of smoking in rural households and occupational exposures to pesticides, dust, livestock, diesel fumes, and solvents in farming communities [5,18,19,20]. Some regions, particularly in the province of Alberta, also experience higher rates of industrial emissions from coal-fired power plant and petrochemical industry processes [21].
Recent studies have explored the intersections of geographic inequalities and pediatric respiratory illnesses in urban centers, noting discrepancies between various neighborhoods; however, little research has evaluated these factors across larger geographic regions, accounting for rural and remote communities [22]. The objective of this study was to explore the geographic inequalities in respiratory healthcare utilization during early childhood and potential links with economically or socially deprived populations in Alberta.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

This was a cross-sectional, secondary analysis using data from a retrospective birth cohort study of all single live births (≥22 weeks of gestation) that occurred in Alberta between 2005 and 2010, with follow-up until five years of age. Alberta is a province located in Western Canada, with a population of ~4 million people and a publicly funded, single-payer healthcare system [23]. The University of Alberta’s Health Research Ethics Board (Pro00088569) granted ethics approval for this research. The study is reported following recommendations by the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement [24].

2.2. Study Population and Data Sources

The original birth cohort included 206,994 singleton live births occurring in Alberta between 1 April 2005 and 31 March 2010 identified from the Alberta Perinatal Health Program, a clinical registry of all Alberta births attended at hospitals or by registered midwives at homes.
The original study flow diagram, data sources, and demographic characteristics of the cohort have been described elsewhere [22,25,26]. Briefly, we obtained de-identified, individual-level data from administrative health databases (i.e., Discharge Abstracts Database and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System) on all respiratory hospitalizations and ED visits occurring from birth until 5 years of age for every member of the cohort. These administrative health databases capture sociodemographic information and data on diagnosis and clinical procedures for every episode of acute care using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, enhanced Canadian version (ICD-10-CA), diagnostic codes [27].

2.3. Definition of Geographic Areas

Individual data on respiratory hospitalizations and ED visits occurring between ages 0 to 5 were aggregated into 35 large geographic areas (health subzones) consisting of populations >40,000 each using the postal code of residence at birth. Health subzones were created by Alberta healthcare authorities for the reporting of demographic, socio-economic, and population health statistics (e.g., health status, services utilization, care complexity rates) (Figure A1a) [28]. These 35 subzones belong to five geographic regions in which health services delivery is organized across the province: South, Calgary, Central, Edmonton, and North (see Table A1 and Figure A1c). The 35 subzones were chosen to aggregate data from low-populated rural areas dispersed across Alberta. Provincial demographic data for 2006–2016 indicates that about 65% of the population live in the metropolitan areas of Calgary and Edmonton, which represent only 2.2% of the total territory [29,30]. The remaining 35% of the population is scattered across the province in areas separated by large extensions of natural landscape (i.e., boreal forest in the north, the Rocky Mountains in the west, and grasslands in the south) [31].
For each member of the birth cohort, we linked the six-character postal code of the maternal place of residence at delivery to the corresponding dissemination areas (DAs), which are the smallest geographic areas for which census data is reported [32]. Dissemination area boundaries were defined using the 2006 census geography framework and the DMTI Spatial Postal Code Suite (Figure A1b) [33,34]. Second, a vector overlay union function in QGIS software was used to associate the DA boundaries with the 35 geographic subzones [35]. One DA including 1478 births was not geographically located within any subzone. Therefore, a total of 205,516 births (99.3% of the original study cohort) providing linkable individual data with the health subzones were selected for further analysis. The shapefiles of subzones’ geographic boundaries were provided by the Alberta Health Services (AHS) and are publicly available at http://www.ahw.gov.ab.ca/IHDA_Retrieval/ihdaGeographic.do (accessed on 28 July 2020).

2.4. Aggregation of Episodes of Acute Respiratory Healthcare Utilization to Health Subzones

All episodes of acute respiratory healthcare utilization were geographically located within 4384 DAs, from which 492 (9.2%) overlapped between two or more subzones. The total numbers of births and respiratory events in the DA across overlapping subzones were divided and weighted proportionally by the population size of each health subzone.

2.5. Study Outcomes: Respiratory Events

For each infant in the birth cohort, we obtained data on all events of acute healthcare utilization between birth and five years of age with an ICD-10-CA primary diagnostic code indicative of any of the following respiratory conditions: acute bronchitis (J20), asthma (J45), bronchiolitis (J21), croup (J05), influenza (J09–J11), pneumonia (J12–J18), other acute lower respiratory tract infections (J22), and other acute upper respiratory tract infections (J00–J06, except J05). We merged recurrent wheezing (R06.2) events with asthma or bronchiolitis based on the most prevalent respiratory condition after the first wheezing event. The follow-up period for respiratory acute healthcare services ran from 2005 to 2015, with data censoring at death or the end of the follow-up period (i.e., five years of age).

2.6. Socioeconomic Status

Material and social deprivation indices derived from 2006 census data were used as area-level proxy measures of SES [36,37]. These indices are composite measures that integrate DA census data for the population in the province aged 15 and over, excluding First Nations groups. DA-level data on income, education, and employment compose the material deprivation index, whereas marital status, one-person household, and single-parent family information compose the social deprivation index. They are reported in quintiles (Q1 = least deprived to Q5 = most deprived). Census data for 2006 was preferred over 2011 census data for index calculations as the latter resulted in a high global nonresponse rate [38].
Subzone-level indicators of material and social deprivation were calculated as the proportion of Q4 and Q5 DAs (the two most deprived quintiles). These indices were used in the statistical analysis to correlate with acute respiratory healthcare utilization by subzone.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated for the number of births and the total number and rates of respiratory healthcare services aggregated by the five larger regions and the 35 subzones.
Geographic inequalities of respiratory healthcare utilization events were evaluated through the comparison of standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) for single and aggregated (total) respiratory outcomes across the various subzones [39]. For each subzone, the SPR was calculated by dividing the total number of respiratory healthcare utilization events by the “expected” number of respiratory healthcare utilization events. The latter was calculated by multiplying the provincial rate of respiratory healthcare utilization events by the number of births. For the provincial rate, we used the total number of respiratory health services during the study period as the numerator and the total number of births as the denominator. An SPR greater than one indicates that more respiratory healthcare utilization events were observed than expected. The means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of SPRs, combining all respiratory outcomes by subzone, are graphically reported. The SPRs for all respiratory healthcare utilization events and for each respiratory illness for all 35 health subzones were mapped using choropleth (descriptive) maps. We used the Jens natural breaks classification as a clustering method to determine the best arrangement of values into different classes while minimizing the squared deviations of the class means and maximizing between-class differences [40]. Choropleth maps were also used to display the geographic distribution of both material and social deprivation indices by subzones.
Finally, correlations between the SPRs (all respiratory healthcare utilization events and for each respiratory illness by all 35 health subzones) and the material/social deprivation indices of subzones were described using the Spearman correlation index. We used this non-spatial correlation approach instead of alternative spatial methods because the estimation of spatial autocorrelation among contiguous areas surrounded by large extensions of unpopulated natural landscape (as previously explained) can be unrealistic. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA, release 15 [41]. Choropleth maps were created using QGIS [35].

3. Results

A total of 297,306 healthcare utilization events from 205,516 singleton live births (99.3% of the original study cohort), which provided linkable individual data with the health subzones (Figure 1), were included in the analysis. Data on the total number of births, total number of respiratory healthcare utilization events, and crude rates of events for each individual respiratory illness for all 35 health subzones are shown in Table A2. Choropleth maps of live births and the SPR of total events (aggregation of ED visits and hospitalizations for all respiratory illnesses) are shown in Figure 2. The choropleth map of live births (Figure 2A) indicates that the greatest number of singleton live births occurred in the large urban centers of Edmonton and Calgary, and the fewest occurred in southern and other rural subzones. The SPRs of healthcare utilization for the pediatric respiratory illnesses (Figure 2B) indicated that the greatest proportion of total healthcare utilization events occurred in the northern subzones (2.06–3.11), with the fewest occurring in the urban centers (0.46–0.73).

3.1. Respiratory Healthcare Utilization

3.1.1. Regional (Zone)

Table 1 indicates the singleton live births and total healthcare utilization events for each zone, and the percentage of those as compared to the entire province, as well as the rate of events per birth. The lowest proportion of births was found for the South (4.79%), North (10.38%), and Central (10.59%) zones, while the greatest proportion occurred in the Calgary (41.25%) and Edmonton (32.98%) zones. The greatest proportion of healthcare utilization events occurred in the Calgary (31.73%), North (24.96%), and Edmonton (22.62%) zones, while the smallest proportion occurred in the South (5.81%) and Central (14.89%) zones. The provincial rate of events per birth was 1.45. The Edmonton (0.99) and Calgary (1.11) zones had lower rates than the entire province. The North (3.48), Central (2.03), and South (1.75) zones had greater rates than the entire province.

3.1.2. Respiratory Illness

Respiratory conditions with the highest healthcare utilization included other acute upper respiratory tract infections (oURTI) (52.00%; n = 154,606), croup (11.57%; n = 34,389), asthma (9.67%; n = 28,757), pneumonia (9.26%; n = 27,533), and bronchiolitis (8.37%; n = 24,895). The conditions with the lowest healthcare utilization included other acute lower respiratory tract infections (oLRTI) (1.72%; n = 5119), influenza (2.49%; n = 7424), and bronchitis (4.87%; n = 14,488).

3.1.3. Standardized Prevalence Ratio

The rate of respiratory healthcare events in Alberta was 1.45 per singleton live birth. The range of SPR values for all subzones and respiratory illnesses was 0.14 (bronchitis, Z2.1 and Z2.2) to 4.80 (bronchitis, Z5.3). Table 2 indicates the SPRs by subzone for healthcare utilization events for all respiratory illnesses combined and for each individual respiratory illness. Figure 3 shows the mean SPRs with 95% CIs by subzone for all healthcare utilization events for respiratory illnesses. In both Table 2 and Figure 3, the reference SPR for the entire province was 1.0. As indicated in the table and figure, there were subzones in the Central zone where the SPR was roughly two times greater and subzones in the North zone where the SPR was roughly three times greater than the provincial SPR. In addition, subzones in both the Calgary and Edmonton zones fell in line with or were less than the provincial SPR. Overall, greater rates of ED visits and hospitalizations for children aged 0–5 were noted in northern communities compared to southern ones, as well as in rural regions compared to urban ones. The choropleth maps of the SPRs by subzone for healthcare utilization events for individual respiratory illnesses are shown in Figure A2.

3.2. Material and Social Deprivation

Correlations between the SPRs (for healthcare utilization events for all respiratory illnesses combined and for each individual respiratory illness) and the material and social deprivation indices (utilizing quintiles Q4 and Q5, the most deprived levels for all subzones) are shown in Table 3. There was a moderate positive correlation (0.48) between the total number of healthcare utilization events and material deprivation, with a range from 0.36 to 0.51. There was also a weak negative correlation (−0.29) between these events and social deprivation, with a range from −0.05 to −0.36. [42]. Choropleth maps of the material and social deprivation indices by subzone are shown in Figure A3.

4. Discussion

This study analyzed the regional distribution of respiratory healthcare utilization in early childhood in Alberta and the correlation with indicators of material and social deprivation. Geographic inequalities are evident in the distribution of healthcare utilization for pediatric respiratory illness across the province, with greater rates occurring in northern communities, as well as rural and remote regions. While there is some association with material and social deprivation for all respiratory illnesses with respect to the healthcare utilization, other factors play a role in the discrepancies between subzones.
Three overarching themes, supported by current literature, may explain the trends of higher rates in northern and rural regions. These themes are community demographics, environmental risk factors, and access to preventive and primary healthcare services.
Material deprivation, which was found to have a moderate positive correlation with these conditions, may have a significant impact in these communities. An Alberta Population Health Profile from 2010 indicates that lower education levels, as well as lower median and average income, were present in northern communities compared to the rest of Alberta [43]. In addition, Indigenous communities are disproportionately affected by pediatric respiratory illnesses and a greater percentage of the population in northern communities identified as Indigenous (15.7%) compared to Alberta as a whole (5.8%) [43,44,45,46,47].
A multitude of environmental risk factors may contribute to the development and/or exacerbation of pediatric respiratory illnesses. Household and parental smoking are associated with increased rates and severity of disease for both upper and lower respiratory tract infections, including pneumonia, bronchiolitis, croup, and influenza [48,49]. The prevalence of smoking is higher in rural and northern regions in Alberta and across Canada. This may be due to fewer smoking restrictions in these communities, greater proportions of individuals working in manual labour occupations, and lower SES [48,50]. These factors result in greater secondary smoke exposure in children that live in these communities and may play a role in their respiratory conditions. Beyond household smoking, specific regions in Alberta are known to have greater industrial air pollutants [51]. Oil sands, several of which are situated in northern Alberta, emit higher concentrations of sulfur, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter. These substances are known respiratory irritants, which may be contributors to both development and exacerbation of pediatric conditions [52,53,54].
Given the extensive range of latitudes in Alberta, climate differences exist across the province. While several regions have a humid continental climate in southern parts of Alberta, the vast majority of northern Alberta has subarctic or boreal climates [55]. A study in the province of Ontario highlighted that regions with colder climates have increased rates of respiratory illnesses, which may explain higher rates of these conditions in northern Alberta as well [56,57].
Health inequalities are common in rural and northern regions of Alberta, particularly in terms of adequate access to preventive and primary healthcare [50,58]. Rural communities with greater distances to large urban centers often have lower vaccination rates than their metropolitan counterparts [59,60]. In 2018–2019, the North zone had the lowest percentage of children vaccinated for influenza under the age of six (20%) and had the greatest rate of laboratory-confirmed influenza cases (295 per 100,000) in Alberta [61,62]. Given that both influenza and several upper and lower respiratory tract infections in children are preventable through vaccinations, this may result in higher rates in ED visits and hospitalizations in these regions. Several studies have also shown that rural and northern communities face barriers to accessing primary care [58,63,64]. They often require ED visits as their only means of obtaining healthcare services or may require these services due to the progressive severity of their conditions [65]. In 2017, AHS conducted surveillance of healthcare service visit rates across the province and showed that three distinct regions (Remote North, Rural North, and Remote West) had the highest rates of ED visits and hospital admissions in the province. These sites were also three of the four lowest regions for family doctor visits per year. In contrast, the largest urban centers in the province (Greater Edmonton and Greater Calgary areas) had the fewest ED visits and hospital admissions and the most family doctor visits per year [66]. Although this study focuses on pediatric respiratory diseases, there is a clear rural–urban gradient for healthcare utilization [67].
Several limitations exist within this study related to diagnostic codes, geographic boundaries, determinants of health, and inclusion of Indigenous communities. First, the use of ICD-10-CA codes may be limited by the clinician’s ability to label each presentation with the appropriate respiratory disease based on individual clinical acumen and/or access to diagnostic testing. The inclusion of more general codes for conditions such as “oURTI” or “oLRTI” can account for any diagnostic uncertainty; however, this may also pose as barrier for further community-level targeted interventions based on each condition’s specific risk factors. Second, large geographic regions (subzones) limit the ability to identify key high-rate regions as data are distributed over a greater population. Although some inaccuracies in the geographic analysis may have arisen, as 9.2% of dissemination areas overlapped between two or more subzones, this proportion is small when considering the entire range of data and unlikely to influence the study results. Third, although material and social deprivation indices were essential in our analysis, the provincial health databases utilized for this study were limited with respect to the broad range of determinants of health that are associated with pediatric respiratory illnesses, including ecological and cultural factors. Finally, given that the material and social deprivation indices were derived from national census data, the incomplete enumeration of many First Nations reserves and Metis settlements resulted in their lack of inclusion in these composite measures [68]. With Indigenous communities being heavily impacted by pediatric respiratory illnesses, as well as facing many barriers to overcome material and social inequities, these indices may underestimate the association with these pediatric respiratory health conditions in this study.
This study highlights geography as a determinant of health that is often underemphasized in research involving pediatric respiratory illnesses and healthcare utilization, with a particular focus on rural and remote communities. Given the extensive land area of Alberta, the use of geographic information systems, in association with regional health authority boundaries, allowed for unique means of understanding a geographic dimension of respiratory health inequalities affecting children across the province. The implications of evaluating distinct regions in terms of their risk factors of pediatric respiratory illnesses can be used to coordinate and apply future interventions in each respective zone. In addition, recognition of inequalities in healthcare utilization can guide resource allocation within the realms of preventive, primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare. Strategies that can be employed to address these issues must occur at a population health level. Limited access to healthcare should be met with provisions to increase primary care providers in these communities, as well as utilization of telehealth services. In addition, health promotion campaigns would highlight the importance of preventive measures, such as immunizations, for individuals and families. Lastly, advocacy and policy development at the provincial level can support the reduction of environmental hazard emissions that heavily impact pediatric respiratory health. These approaches would not only address gaps across large geographic areas but also support underserviced populations who are disproportionately affected by these conditions (e.g., those with higher material deprivation, Indigenous and northern communities, etc.).

5. Conclusions

The purpose of this study was to explore geographic inequalities in healthcare utilization for pediatric respiratory illness in Alberta, Canada. Rural communities in Alberta, particularly in northern regions, face geographic inequalities related to these diseases as determined by ED and hospital-based healthcare utilization. Although material and social deprivation play a role, a multitude of factors, such as limited access to preventive and primary healthcare, greater rates of exposure to smoking and industrial air pollutants, colder climates, and specific barriers affecting Indigenous communities, exist as well. This study is a steppingstone for population-level translational research targeted at pediatric respiratory illnesses in rural and remote communities. Addressing issues of limited access to care, as well as mitigating risks associated with environmental health hazards from pollutants and climate, may reduce the burden of disease in these regions, particularly those of underserved communities. Future studies are warranted for further expansion of these findings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.O., J.S.-L., A.H., J.A.B., S.C., and S.K.; methodology, M.B.O., J.S.-L., and S.K.; formal analysis, J.S.-L.; investigation, S.K., M.B.O., J.S.-L., A.H., J.A.B., and S.C.; resources, S.C., and J.A.B.; data curation, S.C., J.A.B., and J.S.-L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K. and J.S.-L.; writing—review and editing, M.B.O., A.H., J.A.B., and S.C.; visualization, J.S.-L.; supervision, M.B.O.; project administration, M.B.O.; funding acquisition, M.B.O., A.H., J.A.B., and S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received funding from the Alberta Health Services Respiratory Health Strategic Clinical Network Research and Innovation Seed Grant [2019], the Alberta Women’s Health Foundation through the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute, and the Lung Association Alberta & NWT through the 2017–2018 National Grant Review program (https://www.ab.lung.ca/what-we-do/research/grant-opportunities/national-grant-review, accessed on 28 July 2020). Ospina is supported by the Canadian Institute of Health Research as a Canada Research Chair in Life Course, Social Environments and Health (Grant number: 950-232833) through the Government of Canada. The funding agencies did not take part in the study design; the analysis and interpretation of data; the writing of the paper; or the decision to submit it for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The University of Alberta’s Health Research Ethics Board (Pro00088569) granted ethics approval for this research.

Informed Consent Statement

De-identified individual data was provided through respective healthcare databases.

Data Availability Statement

Data cannot be shared publicly because it is held securely in coded form at Alberta Health Services. Alberta Health Services is the legal custodian of the original data. Alberta Health Services’ policies and acts (e.g., Health Information Act of Alberta) guarantee the security, privacy and confidentiality of the patient data. Data agreement with Alberta Health Services prohibits researchers from making the dataset publicly available. Access to data may be granted to those who meet pre-specified criteria for confidential access. Data are available from Alberta Health Services Provincial Research Data Services for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from Alberta Health Services’ (AHS) Health System Access (HSA): https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/research/page8579.aspx (accessed on 28 July 2020). More information at: [email protected].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Appendix A includes supplemental methodological steps, graphs, and tables to understand the research. It includes four sections: (1) Standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) and smoothed SPRs in Figure A1 and Table A1; (2) Moran scatter plots in Table A2; (3) Eigenvectors related to the smoothed SPRs in Figure A2; and (4) Sensitivity analysis: comparison of predicted rates using queen vs. rook connectivity polygons in Figure A3.
Ijerph 18 08347 g0a1 550
Figure A1. (a) Subzones (n = 35) in Alberta consisting of populations >40,000 for the reporting of demographic, socio-economic, and population health statistics. (b) Areas of dissemination (n = 5357) are the smallest (population of ~400 to 700 people) and spatially and temporally stable standard geographic areas used by Statistics Canada to disseminate census data. (c) Health zones in Alberta (n = 5) [26].
Figure A1. (a) Subzones (n = 35) in Alberta consisting of populations >40,000 for the reporting of demographic, socio-economic, and population health statistics. (b) Areas of dissemination (n = 5357) are the smallest (population of ~400 to 700 people) and spatially and temporally stable standard geographic areas used by Statistics Canada to disseminate census data. (c) Health zones in Alberta (n = 5) [26].
Ijerph 18 08347 g0a1
Table
Table A1. Regional subzones of Alberta.
Table A1. Regional subzones of Alberta.
Subzone CodeSubzone NameZone
Z1.1SOUTH ZONE—WESTSOUTH
Z1.2SOUTH ZONE—CENTRALSOUTH
Z1.3SOUTH ZONE—EASTSOUTH
Z1.4SOUTH ZONE—MEDICINE HATSOUTH
Z1.5SOUTH ZONE—LETHBRIDGESOUTH
Z2.1CALGARY—NWCALGARY
Z2.2CALGARY—NECALGARY
Z2.3CALGARY—SECALGARY
Z2.4CALGARY—SWCALGARY
Z2.5FOOTHILLS-VULCAN CORRIDORCALGARY
Z2.6HIGHLAND/ROCKVIEW/WHEATLAND CORRIDORCALGARY
Z2.7BOW CORRIDORCALGARY
Z3.1ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOUSE/DRAYTON VALLEYCENTRAL
Z3.2CENTRAL ZONE—CENTRAL/SOUTHCENTRAL
Z3.3CENTRAL ZONE—SECENTRAL
Z3.4WETASKIWIN/PONOKA/LACOMBECENTRAL
Z3.5CENTRAL ZONE—EASTCENTRAL
Z3.6CENTRAL ZONE—NECENTRAL
Z3.7CITY OF RED DEERCENTRAL
Z4.1EDMONTON—WESTEDMONTON
Z4.2EDMONTON—NEEDMONTON
Z4.3EDMONTON—SEEDMONTON
Z4.4EDMONTON—SWEDMONTON
Z4.5STURGEON COUNTY AND FORT SASKATCHEWANEDMONTON
Z4.6STRATHCONA COUNTY INCLUDING SHERWOOD PARKEDMONTON
Z4.7LEDUC COUNTYEDMONTON
Z4.8WESTVIEWEDMONTON
Z4.9ST. ALBERTEDMONTON
Z5.1NORTH ZONE—SWNORTH
Z5.2NORTH ZONE—SENORTH
Z5.3NORTH ZONE—CENTRAL WESTNORTH
Z5.4NORTH ZONE—NWNORTH
Z5.5NORTH ZONE—NENORTH
Z5.6FORT MCMURRAYNORTH
Z5.7CITY OF GRANDE PRAIRIENORTH
Table
Table A2. Rates (per 1000 singleton live births) of healthcare utilization events for pediatric respiratory illnesses.
Table A2. Rates (per 1000 singleton live births) of healthcare utilization events for pediatric respiratory illnesses.
Total (Aggregated)AsthmaBronchitisBronchiolitisCroupInfluenzaoLRTIoURTIPneumonia
#DAsBirthsEventsRateEventsRateEventsRateEventsRateEventsRateEventsRateEventsRateEventsRateEventsRate
Z1.125128328512222.14244190.189473.27173134.84266207.338465.472922.617491363.21209162.9
Z1.272230932741417.93232100.4813859.77308133.39446193.169340.283816.461708739.71298129.06
Z1.371215662472897.5364168.83482223.56362167.9652302.4119188.598438.9637521740.26344159.55
Z1.494211526191238.3232109.6910449.17229108.27362171.168640.666430.261314621.28231109.22
Z1.5118197822721148.63273138.027135.89240121.33301152.175829.322010.11979494.94338170.88
Z2.14952401220535855.23283136.722309.58187177.923649151.9758924.5326611.088739363.94190379.25
Z2.22271210910796891.571815149.891169.5896079.281222100.9234928.8216213.385054417.38113093.32
Z2.3193964399611032.981464151.8218919.685588.671516157.2128429.4513614.14525469.25972100.8
Z2.460024142247491025.143362139.2648520.09202783.963886160.9670929.3731713.1311465474.92514104.13
Z2.582413298532384.56867209.8335485.67572138.431080261.3721652.2721251.3157581393.51788190.71
Z2.61157662137301791.961301169.862381.31906118.251866243.5431741.3726234.197253946.621199156.49
Z2.794307647161533.16549178.4812941.94410133.29533173.2810333.498828.612280741.22618200.91
Z3.147244872632966.91482196.9417170.34441180.15564230.3913454.748936.3645821871.73543221.81
Z3.288428062021449.07499116.5937587.62429100.23805188.0816839.2510925.473432801.8737988.55
Z3.350185252102813.17360194.38579312.63270145.79514277.549953.465328.6229501592.87388209.5
Z3.482381795122492.01640167.67543142.26751196.75776203.324864.97433113.4447931255.71331348.7
Z3.598220957142586.69323146.22409185.15404182.89519234.958839.8410246.1735251595.74347157.08
Z3.692158246672950.06233147.28311196.59328207.33304192.168654.3610566.3729471862.83340214.92
Z3.7118557056901021.54729130.8831055.6650690.84776139.3216329.267012.572693483.4844780.25
Z4.13171142710986961.411345117.731027.131166102.041527133.6325322.1413211.555058442.641186103.79
Z4.239417759190611073.312264127.4853730.242269127.772485139.9345725.7324113.578676488.542148120.95
Z4.3327116629095779.881305111.919917.06105590.461431122.7118315.6911710.033915335.7188675.97
Z4.415272804817661.6862185.38912.2348766.9824113.198311.4567.692218304.6742658.52
Z4.573292840531384.22337115.126991.87462157.79538183.747224.59268.881961669.74374127.73
Z4.6133550255061000.7353497.0617631.9951192.88789143.47213.09549.813018548.5335063.61
Z4.773408356501383.79527129.0740699.4436990.37759185.899022.04147362766677.44577141.32
Z4.892429955771297.2839190.9523253.97557129.57811188.6510825.1212328.612532588.97824191.67
Z4.98528462491875.26314110.334616.16293102.95497174.635920.73238.08934328.18323113.49
Z5.11195000149302986796159.21582316.41026205.21313262.629358.621342.688221764.4887177.4
Z5.2974947202884101.071101222.561601323.6312122451079218.11589119.06571115.421222924721898383.67
Z5.33175027143618.67111148254338.67239318.6719225663844357.3316582210.67150200
Z5.4775724257934506.111147200.381830319.712482433.611176205.45666116.35651113.73153802686.932460429.77
Z5.5142715472018.4537136.5351188.1938140.2247173.432073.8311.073121151.2940147.6
Z5.660422990982151.34617145.9893211.16588139.04803189.8833579.216715.8451781224.4615145.42
Z5.7714348391933.1858133.6454124.4299228.1181186.641636.871329.954511039.1770161.29
oLRTI = Other acute lower respiratory tract infections. oURTI = Other acute upper respiratory tract infections.
Ijerph 18 08347 g0a2 550
Figure A2. Geographic distribution of SPRs by respiratory illness.
Figure A2. Geographic distribution of SPRs by respiratory illness.
Ijerph 18 08347 g0a2
Ijerph 18 08347 g0a3 550
Figure A3. Geographic distribution of material and social deprivation.
Figure A3. Geographic distribution of material and social deprivation.
Ijerph 18 08347 g0a3

References

  1. Public Health Agency of Canada. Leading Causes of Hospitalizations, Canada, 2009/10, Males and Females Combined, Counts (Age-Specific Hospitalization Rate per 100,000). 2016. Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/leading-causes-death-hospitalization-canada/2009-10-males-females-combined-counts-specific-hospitalization-rate.html (accessed on 28 July 2020).
  2. Dixon, J.; Welch, N. Researching the rural-metropolitan health differential using the “social determinants of health”. Aust. J. Rural Health 2000, 8, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Eagan, T.M.L.; Gulsvik, A.; Eide, G.E.; Bakke, P.S. The effect of educational level on the incidence of asthma and respiratory symptoms. Respir. Med. 2004, 98, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hedlund, U.; Eriksson, K.; Rönmark, E. Socio-economic status is related to incidence of asthma and respiratory symptoms in adults. Eur. Respir. J. 2006, 28, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Karunanayake, C.P.; Hagel, L.; Rennie, D.C.; Lawson, J.A.; Dosman, J.A.; Pahwa, P.; Gordon, J.; Chen, Y.; Dyck, R.; Janzen, B.; et al. Prevalence and risk factors of respiratory symptoms in rural population. J. Agromed. 2015, 20, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Carrière, G.M.; Garner, R.; Sanmartin, C. Housing conditions and respiratory hospitalizations among first nations people in Canada. Health Rep. 2017, 28, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Larcombe, L.; Nickerson, P.; Singer, M.; Robson, R.; Dantouze, J.; McKay, L.; Orr, P. Housing conditions in 2 Canadian first nations communities. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 2011, 70, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Moore, H.C.; De Klerk, N.; Richmond, P.; Lehmann, D. A retrospective population-based cohort study identifying target areas for prevention of acute lower respiratory infections in children. BMC Public Health 2010, 10, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Dales, R.E.; Zwanenburg, H.; Burnett, R.; Franklin, C.A. Respiratory health effects of home dampness and molds among Canadian children. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1991, 134, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Berghout, J.; Miller, J.D.; Mazerolle, R.; O’Neill, L.; Wakelin, C.; Mackinnon, B.; Maybee, K.; Augustine, D.; Levi, C.A.; Levi, C.; et al. Indoor environmental quality in homes of asthmatic children on the Elsipogtog Reserve (NB), Canada. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 2005, 64, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Banerji, A.; Greenberg, D.; White, L.F.; MacDonald, W.A.; Saxton, A.; Thomas, E.; Sage, D.; Mamdani, M.; Lanctôt, K.L.; Mahony, J.B.; et al. Risk factors and viruses associated with hospitalization due to lower respiratory tract infections in canadian inuit children: A case-control study. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2009, 28, 697–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morris, R.D.; Munasinghe, R.L. Geographic variability in hospital admission rates for respiratory disease among the elderly in the United States. Chest 1994, 106, 1172–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Siegel, C.; Davidson, A.; Kafadar, K.; Norris, J.M.; Todd, J.; Steiner, J. Geographic analysis of pertussis infection in an urban area: A tool for health services planning. Am. J. Public Health 1997, 87, 2022–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Crighton, E.J.; Elliott, S.J.; Moineddin, R.; Kanaroglou, P.; Upshur, R.E.G. An exploratory spatial analysis of pneumonia and influenza hospitalizations in Ontario by age and gender. Epidemiol. Infect. 2007, 135, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Haggerty, J.L.; Roberge, D.; Lévesque, J.-F.; Gauthier, J.; Loignon, C. An exploration of rural–urban differences in healthcare-seeking trajectories- Implications for measures of accessibility. Health Place 2014, 28, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Govind, S.K.; Doumouras, A.G.; Nenshi, R.; Hong, D. Geographic variation in appendiceal perforation rates in Canada: A population-based cohort study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2020, 24, 2620–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lawson, J.A.; Rennie, D.C.; Cockcroft, D.W.; Dyck, R.; Afanasieva, A.; Oluwole, O.; Afsana, J. Childhood asthma, asthma severity indicators, and related conditions along an urban-rural gradient: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm. Med. 2017, 17, 15–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Langley, R.L. Consequences of respiratory exposures in the farm environment. N. C. Med. J. 2011, 72, 477–480. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoppin, J.A.; Umbach, D.M.; London, S.J.; Alavanja, M.C.R.; Sandler, D.P. Chemical predictors of wheeze among farmer pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 165, 683–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gomez, M.I.; Hwang, S.A.; Lin, S.; Stark, A.D.; May, J.J.; Hallman, E.M. Prevalence and predictors of respiratory symptoms among New York farmers and farm residents. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2004, 46, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Villeneuve, P.J.; Chen, L.; Rowe, B.H.; Coates, F. Outdoor air pollution and emergency department visits for asthma among children and adults: A case-crossover study in northern Alberta, Canada. Environ. Health 2007, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Serrano-Lomelin, J.; Nielsen, C.C.; Hicks, A.; Crawford, S.; Bakal, J.A.; Ospina, M.B. Geographic inequalities of respiratory health services utilization during childhood in Edmonton and Calgary, Canada: A tale of two cities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Statistics Canada. Census Profile, 2016 Census—Alberta [Province] and Canada [Country]. 2017. Available online: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=PR&Code1=48&Geo2=&Code2=&SearchText=Alberta&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=All&GeoLevel=PR&GeoCode=48&type=0 (accessed on 18 April 2021).
  24. Von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbrouckef, J.P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull. World Health Organ. 2007, 85, 867–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Belon, A.P.; Serrano-Lomelin, J.; Nykiforuk, C.I.J.; Hicks, A.; Crawford, S.; Bakal, J.; Ospina, M.B. Health gradients in emergency visits and hospitalisations for paediatric respiratory diseases: A population-based retrospective cohort study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2020, 34, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Serrano-Lomelin, J.; Hicks, A.; Kumar, M.; Johnson, D.W.; Chari, R.; Osornio-Vargas, A.; Crawford, S.; Bakal, J.; Ospina, M.B. Patterns of respiratory health services utilization from birth to 5 years of children who experienced adverse birth outcomes. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Canadian Institute for Health Information. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Canada. 2015. Available online: http://assets.ibc.ca/Documents/Auto%20Insurance/ICD-10-CA%202015.pdf (accessed on 28 July 2020).
  28. Alberta Health Services and Alberta Health. Official Standard Geographic Areas. 2018. Available online: https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/a14b50c9-94b2-4024-8ee5-c13fb70abb4a/resource/70fd0f2c-5a7c-45a3-bdaa-e1b4f4c5d9a4/download/Official-Standard-Geographic-Area-Document.pdf (accessed on 28 July 2020).
  29. Alberta Government. Alberta Population Estimates—Data Tables. Sub-Provincial Areas Population Estimates: Census Metropolitan Areas, 2001–2018. 2019. Available online: https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/alberta-population-estimates-data-tables (accessed on 4 May 2021).
  30. Statistics Canada. Population and Dwelling Count Highlight Tables, 2011 Census. 2011. Available online: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/hlt-fst/pd-pl/Table-Tableau.cfm?LANG=Eng&T=205&S=3&RPP=50 (accessed on 5 May 2021).
  31. Natural Regions Committee. Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta. 2006. Available online: http://albertaparks.ca/albertaparksca/management-land-use/current-parks-system.aspx (accessed on 8 May 2021).
  32. Statistics Canada. Dissemination Area: Detailed Definition. 2018. Available online: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/92-195-x/2011001/geo/da-ad/def-eng.htm (accessed on 19 June 2021).
  33. Statistics Canada. GeoSuite, 2006. Census Geographic Data Products; Statistics Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  34. DMTI Spatial Inc. Platinum Postal Suite: CanMap Multiple Enhanced Postal Code Geography 2001–2013; DMTI Spatial Inc.: Markham, ON, Canada, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  35. QGIS Version 3.4.14. QGIS Org: A Free and Open Source Geographic Information System. 2019. Available online: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/ (accessed on 19 June 2021).
  36. Pampalon, R.; Hamel, D.; Gamache, P.; Philibert, M.D.; Raymond, G.; Simpson, A. Un indice régional de défavorisation matérielle et sociale pour la santé publique au Québec et au Canada. Can. J. Public Health 2012, 103, S17–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pampalon, R.; Hamel, D.; Gamache, P.; Raymond, G. A deprivation index for health planning in Canada. Chronic Dis. Can. 2009, 29, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Material and Social Deprivation Index: A Summary. Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Bureau D’information et D’études en Santé des Populations—INSPQWebsite. 2019. Available online: www.inspq.qc.ca/en/publications/2639 (accessed on 18 April 2021).
  39. Hosseinpoor, A.R.; Schlotheuber, A.; Nambiar, D.; Ross, Z. Health equity assessment toolkit plus (HEAT Plus): Software for exploring and comparing health inequalities using uploaded datasets. Glob. Health Action 2018, 11, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. ESRI. What Is the Jenks Optimization Method? 2016. Available online: https://support.esri.com/en/technical-article/000006743 (accessed on 28 April 2021).
  41. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software, Version 15.1; College Station: Texas, TX, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  42. Schober, P.; Schwarte, L.A. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth. Analg. 2018, 126, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Predy, G.; Lightfoot, P.; Edwards, J.; Sevcik, M.; Fraser-Lee, N.; Zhang, J.; Dominey, J.; Si, J.; Meyer, C.; Pennicott, D.; et al. How Healthy Are We? 2010 Report of the Senior Medical Officer of Health; Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2011; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  44. McLeod, C.; Adunuri, N.; Booth, R. Risk factors and mitigation of influenza among Indigenous children in Australia, Canada, United States, and New Zealand: A scoping review. Perspect Public Health 2019, 139, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Basnayake, T.L.; Morgan, L.C.; Chang, A.B. The global burden of respiratory infections in indigenous children and adults: A review. Respirology 2017, 22, 1518–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Guèvremont, A.; Carrière, G.; Bougie, E.; Kohen, D. Acute care hospitalization of Aboriginal children and youth standard table symbols. Health Rep. 2017, 11–17. Available online: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-003-x/2017007/article/14844-eng.pdf (accessed on 28 April 2021).
  47. Latycheva, O.; Chera, R.; Hampson, C.; Masuda, J.R.; Stewart, M.; Elliott, S.J.; Fenton, N.E. Engaging first nation and inuit communities in asthma management and control: Assessing cultural appropriateness of educational resources. Rural. Remote. Health 2013, 13, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  48. Li, F.X.; Robson, P.J.; Ashbury, F.D.; Hatcher, J.; Bryant, H.E. Smoking frequency, prevalence and trends, and their socio-demographic associations in Alberta, Canada. Can. J. Public Health 2009, 100, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vanker, A.; Gie, R.P.; Zar, H.J. The association between environmental tobacco smoke exposure and childhood respiratory disease: A review. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2017, 11, 661–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. A Rural-Urban Comparison of Health Indicators. 2003. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.627.4498&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 18 April 2021).
  51. A Costly Diagnosis: Subsidizing Coal Power with Albertans’ Health. 2013. Available online: https://www.pembina.org/reports/pi-costly-diagnosis-26032013.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2021).
  52. La Grutta, S.; Indinnimeo, L.; di Coste, A.; Ferrante, G.; Landi, M.; Pelosi, U.; Rusconi, F. Environmental risk factors and lung diseases in children: From guidelines to health effects. Early Hum. Dev. 2013, 89, S59–S62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Passos, S.D.; Gazeta, R.E.; Felgueiras, A.P.; Beneli, P.C.; Coelho, M.D.S.Z.S. Do pollution and climate influence respiratory tract infections in children? Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. 2014, 60, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Wang, K.Y.; Chau, T.T. An association between air pollution and daily outpatient visits for respiratory disease in a heavy industry area. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Government of Alberta. Alberta Climate Information Service (ACIS) Data Products & Tools. 2020. Available online: http://agriculture.alberta.ca/acis/ (accessed on 18 April 2021).
  56. Radhakrishnan, D.; Ouedraogo, A.; Shariff, S.Z.; McNally, J.D.; Benchimol, E.I.; Clemens, K.K. The association between climate, geography and respiratory syncitial virus hospitalizations among children in Ontario, Canada: A population-based study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Mäkinen, T.M.; Juvonen, R.; Jokelainen, J.; Harju, T.H.; Peitso, A.; Bloigu, A.; Silvennoinen-Kassinen, S.; Leinonen, M.; Hassi, J. Cold temperature and low humidity are associated with increased occurrence of respiratory tract infections. Respir. Med. 2009, 103, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Liu, X.; Shahid, R.; Patel, A.B.; McDonald, T.; Bertazzon, S.; Waters, N.; Seidel, J.E.; Marshall, D.A. Geospatial patterns of comorbidity prevalence among people with osteoarthritis in Alberta Canada. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sibley, L.M.; Weiner, J.P. An evaluation of access to health care services along the rural-urban continuum in Canada. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2011, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lind, C.; Russell, M.L.; Collins, R.; MacDonald, J.; Frank, C.J.; Davis, A.E. How rural and urban parents describe convenience in the context of school-based influenza vaccination: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015, 15, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Government of Alberta. Seasonal Influenza in Alberta—2019–2020 Season. 2020. Available online: https://open.alberta.ca/publications/2561-3154 (accessed on 14 July 2021).
  62. Health Quality Council of Alberta. Influenza Vaccination Rates for Selected High Risk Groups. 2021. Available online: https://focus.hqca.ca/primaryhealthcare/influenzavaccine-rates/ (accessed on 14 July 2021).
  63. Estrada, R.D.; Ownby, D.R. Rural asthma: Current understanding of prevalence, patterns, and interventions for children and adolescents. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017, 17, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shah, T.I.; Clark, A.F.; Seabrook, J.A.; Sibbald, S.; Gilliland, J.A. Geographic accessibility to primary care providers: Comparing rural and urban areas in Southwestern Ontario. Can. Geogr 2020, 64, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Amsalu, E.T.; Akalu, T.Y.; Gelaye, K.A.; Anderson, K.; Weis, T.; Thibault, B.; Khan, F.; Nanni, B.; Farber, N.; Atkinson, P.R.T.; et al. Asthma presentations by children to emergency departments in a Canadian province: A population-based study. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2017, 45, 9–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Alberta Health Services. Service Visit Rates. 2017. Available online: https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/about/page13379.aspx (accessed on 18 April 2021).
  67. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Geographic Distribution of Physicians in Canada—Beyond How Many and Where. 2005. Available online: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Geographic_Distribution_of_Physicians_FINAL_e.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2021).
  68. Statistics Canada. Guide to the Census of Population, 2016. 2017. Available online: https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/ref/98-304/98-304-x2016001-eng.pdf (accessed on 19 June 2021).
Ijerph 18 08347 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study population of singleton live births in Alberta.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of study population of singleton live births in Alberta.
Ijerph 18 08347 g001
Ijerph 18 08347 g002 550
Figure 2. Choropleth maps of numbers of singleton live births organized into quintiles (A) and the SPRs of total healthcare utilization events for all respiratory illnesses combined and organized into quintiles using Jenks breaks (B) in Alberta.
Figure 2. Choropleth maps of numbers of singleton live births organized into quintiles (A) and the SPRs of total healthcare utilization events for all respiratory illnesses combined and organized into quintiles using Jenks breaks (B) in Alberta.
Ijerph 18 08347 g002
Ijerph 18 08347 g003 550
Figure 3. Means and 95% CIs of SPRs of all healthcare utilization events for pediatric respiratory illnesses by subzones in Alberta.
Figure 3. Means and 95% CIs of SPRs of all healthcare utilization events for pediatric respiratory illnesses by subzones in Alberta.
Ijerph 18 08347 g003
Table
Table 1. Singleton live births, total healthcare utilization events for all pediatric respiratory illnesses, and events per birth in Alberta and in each zone.
Table 1. Singleton live births, total healthcare utilization events for all pediatric respiratory illnesses, and events per birth in Alberta and in each zone.
AlbertaSouth
Z1.1–1.5		Calgary Z2.1–2.7Central Z3.1–3.7Edmonton Z4.1–4.9North
Z5.1–5.7
Births, n
(%)		205,516 (100%)9841 (4.79%)84,776 (41.25%)21,758 (10.59%)67,786 (32.98%)21,335 (10.38%)
Events, n
(%)		297,306 (100%)17,263 (5.81%)94,340 (31.73%)44,258 (14.89%)67,236 (22.62%)74,209 (24.96%)
Events per birth1.451.751.112.030.993.48
Table
Table 2. Heat map of standardized prevalence ratios of healthcare utilization events for pediatric respiratory illnesses by subzones in Alberta (heat map) 1.
Table 2. Heat map of standardized prevalence ratios of healthcare utilization events for pediatric respiratory illnesses by subzones in Alberta (heat map) 1.
ZoneSubzoneTotalAsthmaBronchitisBronchiolitisCroupInfluenzaoLRTIoURTIPneumonia
SouthZ1.11.541.361.041.111.241.810.911.811.22
Z1.20.980.720.851.101.151.110.660.980.96
Z1.32.001.213.171.391.812.451.562.311.19
Z1.40.860.780.700.891.021.131.210.830.82
Z1.50.790.990.511.000.910.810.410.661.28
CalgaryZ2.10.590.980.140.640.910.680.440.480.59
Z2.20.621.070.140.650.600.800.540.550.70
Z2.30.711.090.280.730.940.820.570.620.75
Z2.40.711.000.280.690.960.810.530.630.78
Z2.51.651.501.221.141.561.452.061.851.42
Z2.61.241.211.150.981.461.151.371.261.17
Z2.71.061.280.591.101.040.931.150.991.50
CentralZ3.12.051.412.421.491.381.521.462.491.66
Z3.21.000.831.240.831.121.091.021.070.66
Z3.31.941.394.431.201.661.481.152.121.56
Z3.41.721.202.021.621.211.804.551.672.60
Z3.51.791.042.631.511.401.101.852.121.17
Z3.62.041.052.791.711.151.502.662.481.60
Z3.70.710.940.790.750.830.810.500.640.60
EdmontonZ4.10.660.840.380.840.800.610.460.590.77
Z4.20.740.910.431.050.840.710.540.650.90
Z4.30.540.800.240.750.730.430.400.450.57
Z4.40.460.610.170.550.680.320.310.400.44
Z4.50.960.821.301.301.100.680.360.890.95
Z4.60.690.690.450.770.860.360.390.730.47
Z4.70.960.921.410.751.110.611.450.901.05
Z4.80.900.650.771.071.130.701.150.781.43
Z4.90.610.790.230.851.040.570.320.440.85
NorthZ5.12.061.144.491.691.571.621.712.351.32
Z5.22.831.594.592.021.303.304.633.292.86
Z5.32.501.064.802.631.532.332.302.941.49
Z5.43.111.434.543.581.233.224.573.573.21
Z5.51.400.982.671.161.042.040.441.531.10
Z5.61.491.043.001.151.132.190.641.631.09
Z5.71.340.961.761.881.121.021.201.381.20
1 Heat map gradient goes from lower (green) to higher (red) SPR. oLRTI = Other acute lower respiratory tract infections. oURTI = Other acute upper respiratory tract infections.
Table
Table 3. Spearman correlation index between the SPRs of healthcare utilization events for respiratory illnesses and the material and social deprivation levels of all subzones.
Table 3. Spearman correlation index between the SPRs of healthcare utilization events for respiratory illnesses and the material and social deprivation levels of all subzones.
Material DeprivationSocial Deprivation
SPR total 0.48 *−0.29
SPR asthma0.44 *−0.05
SPR bronchitis0.36 *−0.33
SPR bronchiolitis0.36 *−0.23
SPR croup0.40 *−0.36 *
SPR influenza0.47 *−0.16
SPR oLRTI0.51 *−0.16
SPR oURTI0.46 *−0.31
SPR pneumonia0.40 *−0.22
* Indicates correlation coefficients significant at the 0.05 level or lower.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kassam, S.; Serrano-Lomelin, J.; Hicks, A.; Crawford, S.; Bakal, J.A.; Ospina, M.B. Geography as a Determinant of Health: Health Services Utilization of Pediatric Respiratory Illness in a Canadian Province. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8347. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168347

AMA Style

Kassam S, Serrano-Lomelin J, Hicks A, Crawford S, Bakal JA, Ospina MB. Geography as a Determinant of Health: Health Services Utilization of Pediatric Respiratory Illness in a Canadian Province. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(16):8347. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168347

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kassam, Shehzad, Jesus Serrano-Lomelin, Anne Hicks, Susan Crawford, Jeffrey A. Bakal, and Maria B. Ospina. 2021. "Geography as a Determinant of Health: Health Services Utilization of Pediatric Respiratory Illness in a Canadian Province" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 16: 8347. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168347

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop