Next Article in Journal
Older Adults’ Choice of Patterns of Outdoor Physical Activity Duration: A Mixed Multinomial Logit Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Depression Symptoms among Family Members of Nyaope Users in the City of Tshwane, South Africa
Previous Article in Journal
The Humanoid Robot Sil-Bot in a Cognitive Training Program for Community-Dwelling Elderly People with Mild Cognitive Impairment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Variation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms and Treatments: A Side Effect of COVID-19
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Onset of Depression in Middle-Aged Presumed Healthy Slovenian Family Practice Attendees and Its Associations with Genetic Risk Assessment, Quality of Life and Health Status: A Contribution for Family Medicine Practitioners’ Early Detection

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(15), 8197; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158197
by Nina Jerala and Polona Selič-Zupančič *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(15), 8197; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158197
Submission received: 26 May 2021 / Revised: 29 July 2021 / Accepted: 30 July 2021 / Published: 3 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Major Depressive Disorder Research)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

You prepared an interesting and important article about a new tool for use in the primary care settings. I have some minor comments and questions.

  1. Line 276 - I miss the reference
  2. Line 290 - I miss the reference
  3. Line 320-334 - could you please add some explanation why and how have you find a connection between your research and the IPV (it is not mentioned in the methodology that you have had researched that topic)
  4. Line 361 - I can't agree that the results could be generalized for Slovenian population. You have included the participants from 30-65 years, so you could generalise the results only for the middle aged group like you already mentioned it at the title of the article. 20,7% of the Slovenian population is older then 65 years.

With kindly regards, reviver 2

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer #1,

Thank you for your thorough review and valuable comments.

We have amended the article as follows:

Point 1: Line 276 - I miss the reference

Response 1: On further review, we noticed this sentence was a misunderstanding of a claim in the reference cited. We have revised the sentence and provided a new reference.

Please see lines 277-280.

 

Point 2: Line 290 - I miss the reference

Response 2: The reference was checked, it is #51. Afterwards we concluded that the R#1 was not satisfied with our presentation of the content, i.e. ''an inconsistent parental response or lack of atonement for a child’s needs in early life'' and make the wording in our summarisation more clear:

We further theorize that highly symptomatic disease, such as cancer, experienced by a child’s primary caregiver, contribute to the parent not being able to provide continuous care, and could be considered as a stressful or traumatic childhood event, also predisposing an individual to develop depression later in life [51].

Please see lines 294-296.

 

Point 3: Line 320-334 - could you please add some explanation why and how have you find a connection between your research and the IPV (it is not mentioned in the methodology that you have had researched that topic)

Response 3: The research group these authors belong to has previously studied the association between IPV and depression. Given the high co-occurrence of the two in Slovenia, we felt it necessary to elaborate on IPV in the discussion section and referenced this previous finding.

Please see lines 335-336.

 

Point 4: Line 361 - I can't agree that the results could be generalized for Slovenian population. You have included the participants from 30-65 years, so you could generalise the results only for the middle aged group like you already mentioned it at the title of the article. 20,7% of the Slovenian population is older than 65 years.

Response 4: We have modified the wording as suggested, generalising the results only for the middle aged group.

Please see line 376.

(Also added in attachment)

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I found one error in line 227 »healthy related quality of life«- please correct the typo; there should be “health related quality of life«

Further on I have some minor suggestions:

- please change multivariable logistic regression modelling to multivariable    binary logistic regression modelling
- please change expression multivariate to multivariable
- please in case of R2, digit should always be superscript
- please add description of bivariate tests to data analysis section

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer #2,

 

We are grateful for your suggestions and modified the text as follows:

 

Point 1: I found one error in line 227 »healthy related quality of life«- please correct the typo; there should be “health related quality of life«

Response 1: We have corrected the typo.

Please see line 221.

 

Point 2: Please change multivariable logistic regression modelling to multivariable binary logistic regression modelling

Response 2: We changed the wording.

Please see line 168

 

Point 3: Please change expression multivariate to multivariable

Response 3: We changed the wording.

Please see throughout the text and also the Abstract (line 17, 81, 168, 215, 373)

 

Point 4: Please in case of R2, digit should always be superscript

Response 4: We have corrected the digit.

Please see lines 173, 176, 177.

 

Point 5: Please add description of bivariate tests to data analysis section

Response 5: We believe that it is sufficient to add that the data analysis for the whole research project has already been described elsewhere [32]. If the Reviewer #2 finds it essential for the clarity of this text, we will provide an additional description.

Please see lines 153-154.

(Also added in attachment)

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop