Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Oral and Maxillofacial Disorders in Patients with Systemic Scleroderma—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Do Uncontrolled Hypertension, Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and Obesity Mediate the Relationship Between Health Literacy and Chronic Kidney Disease Complications?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 10
10.3390/ijerph18105237
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Survival and Characteristics of Bladder Cancer: Analysis of the Malaysian National Cancer Registry

by
Mohd Nasrullah Nik Ab Kadir
1,
Suhaily Mohd Hairon
1,*,
Najib Majdi Yaacob
2,
Azizah Ab Manan
3,4 and
Nabihah Ali
4
1
Department of Community Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia
2
Unit of Biostatistics and Research Methodology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia
3
Timur Laut District Health Office, Penang State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Georgetown 11600, Malaysia
4
Malaysian National Cancer Registry Department, National Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya 62250, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(10), 5237; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105237
Received: 4 March 2021 / Revised: 2 May 2021 / Accepted: 6 May 2021 / Published: 14 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Health Behavior, Chronic Disease and Health Promotion)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Bladder cancer ranked ninth of principal male cancer in Malaysia. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and survival of bladder cancer patients in Malaysia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by obtaining records in the Malaysian National Cancer Registry. Patients aged 15 years old and above with diagnosis date between 2007 and 2011 were included. Death was updated until 31 December 2016. Five-year observed survival and median survival time were determined by the life table method and Kaplan–Meier estimate method. Results: Among 1828 cases, the mean (SD) age of diagnosis was 64.9 (12.5) years. The patients were predominantly men (78.7%), Malay ethnicity (49.4%) and transitional cell carcinoma (78.2%). Only 14.8% of patients were at stage I. The overall five-year observed survival and median survival time was 36.9% (95% CI: 34.6, 39.1) and 27.3 months (95% CI: 23.6, 31.0). The highest five-year observed survival recorded at stage I (67.6%, 95% CI: 62.0, 73.3) and markedly worsen at stage II (34.3%, 95% CI: 27.9, 40.8), III (25.7%, 95% CI: 18.7, 32.6) and IV (12.2%, 95% CI: 8.1, 16.3). Conclusions: Survival of bladder cancer patients in Malaysia was lower with advancing stage. The cancer control programme should be enhanced to improve survival.

1. Introduction

Bladder cancer ranks as the tenth most frequently diagnosed cancer globally in 2018. It is the ninth most common cancer among men in Malaysia. The incidence of bladder cancer dramatically increases after 65 years old [1]. It is expected to rise with the ageing population [2,3]. Malaysia is projected to have 14.5% of the population aged 65 years old and above in 2040. A marked upsurge from 5% in 2010 [4]. Bladder cancer refers to a malignant tumour, which occurs when cells in the urinary bladder divide uncontrollably, capable of invading surrounding tissues and spreading to other parts of the human body. Nearly all cases of bladder cancer are transitional cell histology, also known as urothelial carcinoma. Other uncommon tissue morphologies are adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and sarcoma [5,6,7]. A previous study in Malaysia’s academic centre described that most bladder cancer patients were male, Chinese and morphologically transitional cell carcinoma [8].
Five-year observed survival and median survival time are primarily used to express cancer survival outcomes. Bladder cancer survival studies conducted worldwide produced heterogeneous results. Population-based cancer registries reported five-year observed overall survival between 51% and 59% [9,10]. Meanwhile, cancer registries that exclude non-invasive cases recorded lower survival rates between 33% and 44% [11,12,13]. Within Asian countries, other hospital-based studies found five-year observed survival between 28% and 58% depending on the patients’ criteria [14,15,16]. Median survival time in Scotland and Belgium were 32 and 47 months, respectively [11,12]. When treatments were considered, patients with muscle-invasive cancer receiving radical cystectomy had the best median survival time between 36 and 52 months [17,18,19,20]. Worst median survival times of fewer than four months were found among stage IV patient who did not receive chemotherapy [21,22,23].
Cancer survival is one of the key indicators to represent healthcare performance and monitoring cancer care progress. A hospital-based study in Malaysia mentioned 33 months as the mean survival time among muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients [8]. Since bladder cancer was not included in the Malaysian Study on Cancer Survival (MySCAN) and CONCORD-3 project of Global Surveillance of Trends in Cancer Survival 2000-14 [24,25], our study aimed to describe the characteristics and determine the survival of bladder cancer patient in Malaysia diagnosed between 2007 and 2011 using population-based data.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Malaysia is located in Southeast Asia and divided into two main regions; Peninsular Malaysia on mainland Asia and East Malaysia on the northern island of Borneo. Malaysia consisted of 13 states and three federal territories, with over 30 million population [4,25].

2.2. Study Design

This is a retrospective study conducted from January to March 2019. Data were obtained from the Malaysian National Cancer Registry, a population-based nationwide coverage cancer registry that received cancer notifications. The registry was established in 2002 and coordinates 15 sub-national cancer registries. The registries received data from multiple sources, including cancer-related pathological, hospital discharge and death records from public and private healthcare facilities to ensure inclusion of all cancer cases [25]. Our study was restricted to Malaysian citizen aged 15-year-old and above with malignant bladder cancer patient (International Classification of Disease for Oncology, 3 edition [ICD-O-3], topographical codes C67) diagnosed between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2011. In situ and benign tumours were excluded. Vital status was updated until 31 December 2016 with the national death registry based on the unique national identity card number. The registrars extracted demographic (age, sex, and ethnicity) and clinical variables at diagnosis (morphology, stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy status) of bladder cancer records. The data were prepared in a Microsoft Excel file. Duplicate records and cases with an invalid date of diagnosis were excluded. Invalid date of diagnosis refers to incidence date documented after the date of death and incidence date of less than two-week duration from death date for patients recorded to have received radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy with histological confirmation [25].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data obtained in Microsoft Excel format were imported in SPSS Software version 24 for analysis. Data were explored for missing entry and distribution of numerical data. Five-year observed survival was estimated using the life table method. The five-year observed survival refers to the proportion of alive patients after five years of diagnosis. The Kaplan–Meier survival estimates method was applied to determine median survival time, which is the first observed time when half of the patients died. The outcome of interest in our analysis was time-to-event. The event referred to death regardless of the cause of death. Patients who did not experience the event was considered censored at the end of the study period or the last available follow-up date. Survival time (in months) was calculated from the date of diagnosis to death or censored. Analyses according to the stage were presented as well for a fairer comparison with other studies.

2.4. Ethical Approval

The study was conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Research and Ethics Committee, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM/JEPeM/18100500) and the Medical Review and Ethical Committee, Ministry of Health Malaysia (NMRR-18-2965-44397 (IIR)).

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics

After excluding duplicate records (n = 54) and cases with an invalid date of diagnosis (n = 29), we analysed 1,828 bladder cancer patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2011. The mean (SD) age of diagnosis was 64.9 (12.5) years old. The patients were predominantly male (n = 1438, 78.7%) and Malay. The most common cancer morphology was transitional cell carcinoma, with 1430 (78.2%) cases. Almost half of the patient received surgical treatment at diagnosis. Meanwhile, more than half of the data regarding the stage at diagnosis, receipt of chemotherapy and radiotherapy at diagnosis were unrecorded. Detailed characteristics can be found in Table 1.

3.2. Five-Year Observed Survival

After five years of diagnosis, it is estimated that 36.9% (95% CI: 34.6, 39.1) of bladder cancer patients survived. Table 2 shows the results of five-year observed survival according to the stage. Patients with stage I disease had the highest five-year survival (67.6%, 95% CI: 62.0, 73.3). Survivals markedly deteriorated for stage II (34.3%, 95% CI: 27.9, 40.8), stage III (25.7%, 95% CI: 18.7, 32.6) and stage IV (12.2%, 95% CI: 8.1, 16.3).

3.3. Median Survival Time

The median survival times for bladder cancer patients in Malaysia (n = 1828) was 27.3 months (95% CI: 23.6, 31.0). Median survival times according to cancer stage are presented in Table 2. No median survival time could be estimated for stage I bladder cancer patients because less than half of the patient died at the end of the study period. The Kaplan–Meier curves for overall and according to the stage at diagnosis are presented in Figure 1.

4. Discussion

In this study, we described the characteristics and estimated the survivals of bladder cancer patients in Malaysia. Our study found that the mean age of diagnosis resembled the previous study in Malaysia [8], other Asian countries [15,16], and European countries [6,26,27]. However, the mean age of diagnosis was younger than documented in the United States, which was more than 70 years old [18,22,23]. Male to female distribution in our study reflected the global distribution and other literature [10,26,28,29]. A disproportionately high prevalence of tobacco smoking and particular carcinogenic occupational exposure among men could explain the striking difference [28,30]. The differences in the biological and hormonal mechanism between sex had also been suggested [31].
The largest ethnic group among Malaysian citizen were Malay, followed by Chinese and Indian [4]. Therefore, our study revealed similar trends. However, a study in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, stated that the Chinese make up the largest patient group [8]. The findings might be resulted from limited patients’ enrolment and was conducted in an urban area with a high Chinese population. The percentage of urothelial carcinoma in our study sample was lower than in other studies (range: 86–96%). The result possibly due to a relatively high proportion of nonspecific morphology in our sample could be the urothelial carcinoma histology [6,10,18,32].
The proportion of unrecorded bladder cancer stage was higher than the top three cancer in Malaysia. Female breast, colorectal and lung cancer had 32.7%, 42.4% and 41.2% of unrecorded stage, respectively [25]. Stage data were also substantially missing in other studies [16,21]. Population-based cancer registries in Europe faced similar challenges, with only four cancer registries providing a quality cancer stage for further analysis [33]. Among those with a recorded stage at diagnosis, the proportion of stage I was 30.4%, stage II (24.3%), III (17.2%) and IV (28.1%). A similar distribution was found in Indonesia’s national referral centre. In the study, the percentage of stage I, II, III and IV were 27.6%, 24.0%, 19.3% and 19.3%, respectively [15].
In contrast, more than four out of five patients in Norway and the United States presented at the early localised stage [1,2,34]. Stage IV distribution in our sample was two times higher than that of the Netherlands Cancer Registry and Yazd hospitals, Iran [6,16]. Stage IV patients have a grave prognosis, and their higher percentage among study populations decreased overall five-year survival and median survival time.
The overall five-year observed survival for bladder cancer patients in Malaysia was better than a hospital-based study in Jakarta, Indonesia, which reported five-year survival of 27.6% [15]. Yet, in contrast, survival was markedly low compared to the developed countries. The neighbouring country, Singapore, recorded a five-year survival of 58.5% and 53.6% for men and women, respectively [9]. A study in Kanagawa, Japan, among patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2010 found higher five-year survival of 54% and 51% among males and females, respectively [10]. The study includes approximately 10% of urothelial carcinoma in situ, and 95.1% of the patients were transitional cell carcinoma, compared to none and 78.2% in our study. The substantial difference might contribute to lower survival in our study as in situ lesion and urothelial carcinoma associated with better prognosis. Similarly, the five-year survival was 54.5% and 47.8% for male and female bladder cancer patients in New South Wales, Australia [35]. The patient population had a higher proportion of localised disease (49.4%) and transitional cell histology (89.9%). However, our findings were incongruent with other population-based cancer registries which exclude benign lesion in Scotland, Denmark, and Belgium. These registries reported five-year survival between 33.3% and 44.0% [11,12,13].
Regarding the overall median survival time of bladder cancer, our study’s finding was much lower than the findings in Iran of 51 months [16]. However, the study restricted to bladder cancer patients referred to tertiary centres and received radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Patients without treatment at diagnosis fare worse in term of survival and expectedly lowering the overall median survival time [18]. Population-based cancer registries in Scotland (46.8 months) and Belgium (male: 45, female: 32 months) recorded a more favourable median survival time nevertheless [11,12].
Comparing overall five-year survival using population-based cancer registries’ database should be made cautiously, particularly in bladder cancer. Cancer registries in the United States, Europe and the developed countries had included in situ and non-invasive bladder cancer in their database due to the malignant potential and inability to differentiate between in situ and invasive lesion reliably. Registries which omit non-invasive bladder tumour found to have the lowest five-year survival in the European Cancer Registry Based Study on Survival and Care of Cancer Patients, EUROCARE-5 [1,7,36]. Since our bladder cancer patients presented with more adverse disease characteristic such as a higher percentage of advanced stage at diagnosis, exclusion of non-invasive tumour and lower proportion of urothelial carcinoma, it is not surprising that the overall five-year survival was lesser than other studies. Therefore, discussing our survival findings according to the stage at the initial presentation would provide better insight.
For stage I, our five-year survival was better than what was found in Jakarta of 53.8% [15], similar to a study in Yazd, Iran of 66% [16], and lower than 71% recorded in Erlangen, Germany [27]. Median survival time for stage I could not be estimated as more than half of the patient still alive until the closure of the study. Stage II and III in bladder cancer are more or less equivalent to non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer disease. Several studies, which enrolled these patients who underwent cystectomy surgery, reported overall five-year survival and median survival time of more than 45% and 36 months [14,20,23]. Patients managed by curative intent surgery were known to have an excellent prognosis, thereby explaining higher survival. Our result is comparable to a study in Jakarta [15] and a study that includes all patients regardless of treatment type [19]. Meanwhile, for stage IV, the five-year survival determined by this study was consistent with other studies suggesting inevitable severe prognosis in this subgroup of patients [15,32]. Similarly, our stage IV patient’s median survival time was within the range of the multiple studies conducted worldwide between three and 16 months [21,22,23,26,32].
The limitation of our study primarily resulted from the limitations of using secondary data. A high proportion of unrecorded data in the morphology, stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy variable restricted us to explore the factors contributing to the lower survival result. The strength of our study was using population-based nationwide data. The finding could be generalised to the Malaysian population. Completeness of death status follow-up in our study is another key strength. The registry updated the vital status as provided by the mortality registry using the Malaysian citizens’ identification number.

5. Conclusions

Bladder cancer survival among Malaysian was lower with increasing stage of cancer. Among the recorded stages at diagnosis, the overwhelming majority of patients presented at a later stage, which carries a poor survival rate. Data on treatment options were scarce to evaluate current treatment modalities offered. These findings highlight the importance of cancer prevention and early detection. Community and primary care practitioners should be empowered to live healthily and recognise the early signs and symptoms for expedite referral and comprehensive management care. Cancer registration should be strengthened and linked with the healthcare information system for robust cancer care surveillance.

Author Contributions

M.N.N.A.K.: conception and design, acquisition and preparation of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript, final approval of the version to be submitted; S.M.H.: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript, final approval of the version to be submitted; N.M.Y.: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript, final approval of the version to be submitted; A.A.M.: conception and design, acquisition and preparation of data, critical revision of the manuscript, final approval of the version to be submitted; N.A.: acquisition and preparation of data, critical revision of the manuscript, final approval of the version to be submitted. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. However, we would like to acknowledge the School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, for financing publication fees.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Medical Review and Ethical Committee of Ministry of Health Malaysia (protocol code: NMRR-18-2965-44397 (IIR) and date of approval: 20 December 2018), and the Human Research and Ethics Committee, Universiti Sains Malaysia (protocol code: USM/JEPeM/18100500 and date of approval: 13 December 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

We obtained permission from the data custodian, the Directors of the National Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health, Putrajaya. Patient consent was waived due to the data obtained did not have identifiable patient data.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings are available from the National Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health Malaysia, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data. These data were used under agreement for the current study and are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors but only with the explicit permission of the Director-General, Ministry of Health Malaysia.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support and approval for publications from the Director-General of Health, Ministry of Health, Malaysia and from the Directors of the National Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health, Putrajaya.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Noone, A.; Howlader, N.; Krapcho, M.; Miller, D.; Brest, A.; Yu, M. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2015; Based on November 2017 SEER Data Submission, Posted to the SEER Web Site, April 2018; National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2018.
  2. Nielsen, M.E.; Smith, A.B.; Meyer, A.-M.; Kuo, T.-M.; Tyree, S.; Kim, W.Y.; Milowsky, M.I.; Pruthi, R.S.; Millikan, R.C. Trends in stage-specific incidence rates for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States: 1988 to 2006. Cancer 2014, 120, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  3. Joung, J.Y.; Lim, J.; Oh, C.-M.; Jung, K.-W.; Cho, H.; Kim, S.H.; Seo, H.K.; Park, W.S.; Chung, J.; Lee, K.H.; et al. Current Trends in the Incidence and Survival Rate of Urological Cancers in Korea. Cancer Res. Treat. 2017, 49, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  4. Department of Statistics Malaysia. Press Release Population Projection (Revised), Malaysia, 2010–2040; Department of Statistics: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2016. Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=118&bul_id=Y3kwU2tSNVFDOWp1YmtZYnhUeVBEdz09&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09 (accessed on 15 March 2019).
  5. Antoni, S.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Znaor, A.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Bladder Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Global Overview and Recent Trends. Eur. Urol. 2017, 71, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ploeg, M.; Aben, K.K.; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, C.A.; Schoenberg, M.P.; Witjes, J.A.; Kiemeney, L.A. Clinical Epidemiology of Nonurothelial Bladder Cancer: Analysis of The Netherlands Cancer Registry. J. Urol. 2010, 183, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Royce, T.J.; Lin, C.C.; Gray, P.J.; Shipley, W.U.; Jemal, A.; Efstathiou, J.A. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of nonurothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder: Results from the National Cancer Data Base. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2018, 36, 78.e1–78.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kong, C.H.C.; Singam, P.; Hong, G.E.; Cheok, L.B.; Azrif, M.; Tamil, A.M.; Zainuddin, Z.M. Clinicopathological features of bladder tumours in a single institution in Malaysia. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2010, 11, 149–152. [Google Scholar]
  9. Singapore Cancer Registry. Singapore Cancer Registry Cancer Survival in Singapore 1973–2012; National Registry of Diseases Office, Ministry of Health: Singapore, 2015. Available online: https://www.nrdo.gov.sg/publications/cancer (accessed on 7 October 2018).
  10. Zaitsu, M.; Toyokawa, S.; Tonooka, A.; Nakamura, F.; Takeuchi, T.; Homma, Y.; Kobayashi, Y. Sex differences in bladder cancer pathology and survival: Analysis of a population-based cancer registry. Cancer Med. 2015, 4, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Belgian Cancer Registry. Cancer Survival in Belgium; Belgian Cancer Registry: Brussel, Belgium, 2012; Available online: http://www.kankerregister.org/media/docs/publications/CancerSurvivalinBelgium.PDF (accessed on 24 September 2018).
  12. ISD Scotland. Cancer Survival in Scotland 1987–2011; Information Services Division (ISD), NHS Scotland: Scotland, UK, 2015; Available online: https://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Cancer/Publications/2015-03-03/2015-03-03-CancerSurvival-Report.pdf? (accessed on 7 October 2018).
  13. Lund, L.; Erichsen, R.; Nørgaard, M.; Larsen, E.; Borre, M.; Jacobsen, J. Survival of invasive bladder cancer patients, 1998-2009; a central and northern Denmark population-based cohort study. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011, 3, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  14. Mokhtar, A.; Al Alawi, M.M.; Al Taweel, W.M.; Al Othman, K.; Kattan, S.A.; Al Otaibi, M.F. Is survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Saudi patients different from that of Western patients? Ann. Saudi Med. 2017, 37, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  15. Supit, W.; Mochtar, C.A.; Santoso, R.B.; Umbas, R. Outcomes of radical cystectomy and bladder preservation treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Asian J. Surg. 2014, 37, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  16. Vahedian-Ardakani, H.-A.; Moghimi, M.; Shayestehpour, M.; Doosti, M.; Alimohammadi, F. Survival Rate of Patients with Bladder Cancer in Yazd, Central Province of Iran. 2018. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85048710356&doi=10.5812%2Fijcm.61436&partnerID=40&md5=f6daf89cf694d7e6ebafcebc489857c5 (accessed on 7 October 2018).
  17. Haque, W.; Verma, V.; Butler, E.B.; Teh, B.S. Radical Cystectomy Versus Chemoradiation for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Impact of Treatment Facility and Sociodemographics. Anticancer Res. 2017, 37, 5603–5608. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kozak, K.R.; Hamidi, M.; Manning, M.; Moody, J.S. Bladder preservation for localised muscle-invasive bladder cancer: The survival impact of local utilisation rates of definitive radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012, 83, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Smith, A.B.; Deal, A.M.; Woods, M.E.; Wallen, E.M.; Pruthi, R.S.; Chen, R.C.; Milowsky, M.I.; Nielsen, M.E. Muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Evaluating treatment and survival in the National Cancer Data Base. BJU Int. 2014, 114, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zakaria, A.S.; Santos, F.; Kassouf, W.; Tanguay, S.; Aprikian, A. Survival after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in Relation to Prior Non-Muscle Invasive Disease in Quebec. Urol. Int. 2016, 97, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fisher, M.D.; Shenolikar, R.; Miller, P.J.; Fenton, M.; Walker, M.S. Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Stage IV Bladder Cancer in a Community Oncology Setting: 2008–2015. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2018, 16, e1171–e1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  22. Flannery, K.; Cao, X.; He, J.; Zhong, Y.; Shah, A.Y.; Kamat, A.M. Survival Rates and Health Care Costs for Patients With Advanced Bladder Cancer Treated and Untreated With Chemotherapy. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2018, 16, e909–e917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  23. Haque, W.; Verma, V.; Butler, E.B.; Teh, B.S. National Practice Patterns and Outcomes for T4b Urothelial Cancer of the Bladder. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2018, 16, 42–49.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Allemani, C.; Matsuda, T.; Di Carlo, V.; Harewood, R.; Matz, M.; Nikšić, M.; Bonaventure, A.; Valkov, M.; Johnson, C.J.; Estève, J.; et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–2014 (CONCORD-3): Analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet 2018, 391, 1023–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  25. National Cancer Institute Ministry of Health Malaysia. Malaysian Study on Cancer Survival (MySCan); National Cancer Institute Ministry of Health Malaysia: Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2018. Available online: http://nci.moh.gov.my/index.php/ms/main-menu-2/laporan (accessed on 7 October 2018).
  26. Roubaud, G.; Brouste, V.; Beuzeboc, P.; Fléchon, A.; Tosi, D.; Lavau-Denes, S.; Chevreau, C.; Culine, S.; Oudard, S.; Quivy, A.; et al. Early objective response may not be a prognostic factor of survival for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: From a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 113 patients. J. Negat. Results Biomed. 2015, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krause, F.S.; Walter, B.; Ott, O.J.; Häberle, L.; Weiss, C.; Rödel, C.; Wullich, B.; Sauer, R. 15-Year Survival Rates After Transurethral Resection and Radiochemotherapy or Radiation in Bladder Cancer Treatment. Anticancer Res. 2011, 31, 985–990. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  29. Keck, B.; Ott, O.J.; Häberle, L.; Kunath, F.; Weiss, C.; Rödel, C.; Sauer, R.; Fietkau, R.; Wullich, B.; Krause, F.S. Female sex is an independent risk factor for reduced overall survival in bladder cancer patients treated by transurethral resection and radio- or radiochemotherapy. World J. Urol. 2013, 31, 1023–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cumberbatch, M.G.K.; Noon, A.P. Epidemiology, aetiology and screening of bladder cancer. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2019, 8, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Dobruch, J.; Daneshmand, S.; Fisch, M.; Lotan, Y.; Noon, A.P.; Resnick, M.J.; Shariat, S.F.; Zlotta, A.R.; Boorjian, S.A. Gender and Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Review of Etiology, Biology, and Outcomes. Eur. Urol. 2016, 69, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rose, T.L.; Deal, A.M.; Nielsen, M.E.; Smith, A.B.; Milowsky, M.I. Sex disparities in use of chemotherapy and survival in patients with advanced bladder cancer. Cancer 2016, 122, 2012–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  33. Minicozzi, P.; Innos, K.; Sánchez, M.J.; Trama, A.; Walsh, P.M.; Marcos-Gragera, R.; Dimitrova, N.; Botta, L.; Visser, O.; Rossi, S.; et al. Quality analysis of population-based information on cancer stage at diagnosis across Europe, with presentation of stage-specific cancer survival estimates: A EUROCARE-5 study. Eur. J. Cancer 2017, 84, 335–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Andreassen, B.K.; Aagnes, B.; Gislefoss, R.; Andreassen, M.; Wahlqvist, R. Incidence and Survival of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder in Norway 1981–2014. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  35. Patel, M.I.; Bang, A.; Gillett, D.; Cheluvappa, R.; Smith, D.P. Poor survival of females with bladder cancer is limited to those aged 70 years or over: A population-wide linkage study, New South Wales, Australia. Cancer Med. 2015, 4, 1145–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Marcos-Gragera, R.; Mallone, S.; Kiemeney, L.A.; Vilardell, L.; Malats, N.; Allory, Y.; Sant, M.; Hackl, M.; Zielonke, N.; Oberaigner, W.; et al. Urinary tract cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007: Results of the population-based study EUROCARE-5. Eur. J. Cancer 2015, 51, 2217–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 18 05237 g001 550
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier Curve for survival estimate according among bladder cancer patients in Malaysia, i.e., for: (a) Overall patients; (b) Patients according to the stage at diagnosis.
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier Curve for survival estimate according among bladder cancer patients in Malaysia, i.e., for: (a) Overall patients; (b) Patients according to the stage at diagnosis.
Ijerph 18 05237 g001
Table
Table 1. Bladder cancer patients’ characteristics (n = 1828).
Table 1. Bladder cancer patients’ characteristics (n = 1828).
Characteristicsn (%)
Age (mean, SD)64.9 (12.5)
Sex
   Male1438 (78.7)
   Female390 (21.3)
Ethnicity
   Malay903 (49.4)
   Chinese684 (37.4)
   Indian107 (5.9)
   Iban36 (2.0)
   Kadazan17 (0.9)
   Others81 (4.4)
Morphology
   Urothelial carcinoma1430 (78.2)
   Squamous cell carcinoma57 (3.1)
   Adenocarcinoma150 (8.2)
   Sarcoma10 (0.6)
   Others7 (0.4)
   Nonspecific174 (9.5)
Stage
   I270 (14.8)
   II216 (11.8)
   III153 (8.4)
   IV250 (13.7)
   Unrecorded939 (51.4)
Surgery
   Yes902 (49.3)
   No297 (16.3)
   Unrecorded629 (34.4)
Radiotherapy
   Yes221 (12.1)
   No573 (31.3)
   Unrecorded1034 (56.6)
Chemotherapy
   Yes191 (10.5)
   No587 (32.1)
   Unrecorded1050 (57.4)
Table
Table 2. Five-year observed survival and median survival time for bladder cancer patients in Malaysia.
Table 2. Five-year observed survival and median survival time for bladder cancer patients in Malaysia.
StageFive-Year Survival
% (95% CI)		Median Survival Time
Months (95% CI)
I67.6 (62.0, 73.3)-
II34.3 (27.9, 40.8)27.6 (18.1, 37.0)
III25.7 (18.7, 32.6)17.0 (13.3, 20.7)
IV12.2 (8.1, 16.3)8.8 (7.0, 10.7)
Unrecorded36.9 (33.7, 40.1)29.3 (23.5, 31.0)
All36.9% (95% CI: 34.6, 39.1)27.3 (23.6, 31.0)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nik Ab Kadir, M.N.; Mohd Hairon, S.; Yaacob, N.M.; Ab Manan, A.; Ali, N. Survival and Characteristics of Bladder Cancer: Analysis of the Malaysian National Cancer Registry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105237

AMA Style

Nik Ab Kadir MN, Mohd Hairon S, Yaacob NM, Ab Manan A, Ali N. Survival and Characteristics of Bladder Cancer: Analysis of the Malaysian National Cancer Registry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(10):5237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nik Ab Kadir, Mohd Nasrullah, Suhaily Mohd Hairon, Najib Majdi Yaacob, Azizah Ab Manan, and Nabihah Ali. 2021. "Survival and Characteristics of Bladder Cancer: Analysis of the Malaysian National Cancer Registry" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 10: 5237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop