Next Article in Journal
PM2.5 Pollution Strongly Predicted COVID-19 Incidence in Four High-Polluted Urbanized Italian Cities during the Pre-Lockdown and Lockdown Periods
Previous Article in Journal
Patients’ Behavior Regarding Dietary or Herbal Supplements before and during COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 18
Issue 10
10.3390/ijerph18105079
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physical Activity Counseling among Adults in Primary Health Care Centers in Brazil

by
Letícia Pechnicki dos Santos
1,
Alice Tatiane da Silva
1,2,
Cassiano Ricardo Rech
3 and
Rogério César Fermino
1,2,*
1
Research Group in Environment, Physical Activity and Health, Federal University of Technology—Parana, Curitiba 81310-900, Brazil
2
Postgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba 81531-980, Brazil
3
Physical Education Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(10), 5079; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105079
Submission received: 11 March 2021 / Revised: 22 April 2021 / Accepted: 3 May 2021 / Published: 11 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Exercise and Health)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Physical activity (PA) counseling by health professionals has promising results in behavior change. However, few studies have evaluated its prevalence in Primary Health Care in Latin American countries. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and analyze the associated factors of PA counseling in adults in Primary Health Care in Brazil. This is a cross-sectional study with a representative sample of 779 adults (70% women). Counseling was identified among those who reported having received PA counseling during a health professional consultation in the last 12 months. Sociodemographic factors, health conditions, and leisure-time PA were analyzed with Poisson regression. The prevalence of counseling was 43% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 39.5–46.4%), higher in people aged ≥40 years (Prevalence Ratio [PR]: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.19–1.75], who are married (PR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.07–1.59), obese (PR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.23–1.90), take prescription medication (PR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.47–2.27), and walk for leisure (PR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.06–1.54). People with more education were less likely to receive PA counseling (PR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68–0.99). In conclusion, 4 out of 10 users reported receiving PA counseling and this was associated with sociodemographic factors, health conditions, and walking for leisure. These results can guide PA promotion in Primary Health Care.

1. Introduction

In most countries, the current health scenario is a consequence of an increase in chronic diseases due to the adoption of unhealthy lifestyles, emphasizing physical inactivity [1]. Despite the benefits of regular physical activity (PA), about 28% of the world adult population does not follow the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [2,3]. Physical inactivity prevalence is high among Latin American countries (39%), especially in Brazil (47%) [2]. Besides being a risk factor for developing chronic diseases, physical inactivity negatively affects mental and physical health and quality of life [1,3].
Thus, integrated programs of PA promotion at the population level have been implemented in many countries globally, which presuppose the interrelationship between different community sectors, such as school, active commuting, built environment, and health professionals [4,5,6]. In this context, the Brazilian Primary Care Policy was approved in 2011 [7] and aims to promote health through actions described as Basic Health Units (BHUs—Unidades Básicas de Saúde, UBS in Portuguese), as these are the gateway for the population to the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde, SUS in Portuguese) [7,8,9]. It becomes relevant to incorporate these health counseling actions, raising awareness about the adoption of healthy behaviors [5,10,11,12]. Conceptually, counseling is an educational practice by health professionals to empower individuals to become active as part of their overall health maintenance [10,13,14,15,16,17]. This practice respects people’s autonomy and values their potential, thus promoting behavioral changes and improving their quality of life [10,11,12].
In this context, all health professionals should counsel or guide their patients about PA [10,11], and consultations represent an essential opportunity for this educational practice, due to the high confidence in these professionals, especially in physicians [18]. In Brazil, 76% of adults (≈160 million) consulted with a physician in the past 12 months [8]. Moreover, 70% of the population regularly uses public health services, with BHUs being the most reported (47%). Brazil has 42,488 BHUs, and the purpose of these health centers is to deal with up to 80% of the population’s health problems without hospitals. Women, middle-aged adults and the elderly, people of low-economic status, people of color, and married are the most frequent users of BHUs [8].
PA counseling by health professionals has had promising results in behavior change and is recommended as part of integrated community interventions [5,11,12,16,17]. The WHO, the American College of Sports Medicine, and the International Society for Physical Activity and Health have recommended that health professionals promote PA through counseling [3,4,19,20]. Besides being low-cost, easy to apply, and easily used by health professionals [13,14,15], evidence shows a positive effect of counseling on PA levels [11,12,16,17].
Patient PA counseling is underutilized [20], and few studies have evaluated this action in Primary Health Care in Latin American countries [21]. The prevalence is low (37%) and even lower in high-income countries (34%) when compared to others (43%) [21]. In Brazil, the research has investigated the PA counseling received by adults [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] and the elderly [22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30]. While some studies explored a representative population-based sample [23,24,30] and residents of the coverage area of BHUs [22], others were explicitly conducted in BHUs [22,25,26,27,28,29]. In these studies, the prevalence of PA counseling received by BHUs users was 42%, and many sociodemographic factors (sex, age, marital status, skin color, education, economic level) and health conditions (overweight, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia) were analyzed and show inconsistency and contradictory results. For example, while some studies show an absence of association between sex and counseling [25,26,28], others found a positive association with the female sex [22,26], while others found an inverse association [27]. Only one study in BHUs analyzed the association between counseling and leisure-time PA (LTPA) [25]. Nevertheless, some studies show high-risk bias [21] (e.g., PA counseling evaluated in combination with counseling for healthy eating habits [27], sample not representative, participants intentionally selected from few BHUs [27,28,29]), which may not represent the populational sociodemographic and the contextual reality of specific places and cities.
It is essential to expand this knowledge, based on robust studies with a representative sample from BHUs in order to identify the individuals who are more exposed to PA counseling. This approach and its results are essential so that health professionals can implement and direct specific actions to promote PA towards disadvantaged population groups and those facing barriers to starting PA, whether due to psychosocial issues or lack of information, based on each city’s context or region. Thus, this study aimed to describe the prevalence and to analyze the associated factors of PA counseling in adults in Primary Health Care centers in Brazil.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Characteristics and Ethical Aspects

This study was reported according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. In 2019, a quantitative, observational, and cross-sectional study was conducted in a representative sample of adults in the BHUs of an urban area of São José dos Pinhais (Parana state, Southern Brazil). The general project aimed to evaluate PA or sedentary behavior counseling, LTPA, and some of their determinants [31].
BHUs are public clinics strategically distributed within a city, with free access for Primary Health Care provided by physicians, nurses, pharmacists, physiotherapists, nutritionists, psychologists, and community health agents [9]. In some Brazilian cities, some BHUs also include physical education professionals [32,33].
São José dos Pinhais is a developed city in the metropolitan area of Curitiba (state capital), a distance of 18 km from downtown to downtown. It has an area of 946 km2 (21% urban), there is an estimated population of 329,058 inhabitants (medium size), a population density of 280 inhabitants km2, and a high Human Development Index (0.758). Some indicators among São José dos Pinhais, Curitiba, and Brazil are similar (Table 1) [34].
The city has 413 health establishments, among which are 27 BHUs (56% in the urban area). Only BHUs in the urban area (n = 15) were intentionally selected, as these are accessible to 90% of the city’s population. The study was approved by the National Commission for Ethics in Research (CONEP) of the National Health Council, with the Certificate of Presentation of Ethical Appreciation (CAAE) under protocol number 95985118.0.0000.0020, and by the Research Ethics Committee of the Pontifical Catholic University of Parana under the number 2.882.260. Participants were consulted, informed about voluntariness, and agreed to participate in the research by signing an informed consent form, according to the recommendations of CONEP.

2.2. Sample Size, Number of Participants, and Sample Power

The number of participants was estimated based on the average number of visits made in each BHU between January and February 2019 (N = 34,275). For sample representation, we considered the prevalence of PA counseling received in BHU (30%—based on a literature review available during the project planning and pilot study) and a 95% confidence level. A sampling error of four percentage points and a design effect of 1.5 were also regarded [35]. As a result, the minimum number of participants was estimated at 745 people. However, with a 10% increase for losses and refusals, we estimated a minimum of 820 adults. Nevertheless, it was decided to approach a surplus of 100 people (n = 920) to reduce the estimation errors for multivariate analyses in future studies. The sample size was proportionally calculated by the number of visits to each BHU and varied between 31 to 92 users.
A total of 779 participants were interviewed (544 women and 235 men). A posteriori statistical analyses showed that, based on the predictor variables, our sample had an average power of 90% (β: 20%) and a confidence level of 95% (α: 5%) to detect prevalence ratio (PR), identified as significant in our study. This analysis was conducted using software G*Power (University of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany).

2.3. Selection of Participants

The participants were systematically selected based on their position in the waiting room at the BHU, counting between the first and fifth, from left to right of the entrance door [25]. The third user was selected, approached, and invited to participate in the study. In case of refusal, if the participant did not meet the inclusion criteria, the first person on the left was then selected. However, in some BHUs, this procedure was unfeasible due to the small number of people present and differences in the waiting rooms’ layout. In these cases, the first users to the left were approached.
Only adults (≥18 years) were eligible and invited. Among them, we excluded people who lived outside the urban area, and were using the BHU for the first time, had some physical limitation for PA practice (e.g., wheelchair and crutch users), or had some cognitive or phonation limitation that prevented comprehension of the questionnaire (e.g., hearing impairment, mental disorders) (n = 9).

2.4. Data Collection

Ten trained interviewers conducted face-to-face interviews before or after consultation by health professionals in an individual, reserved room to ensure no external influence on the responses. The average time of application of the questionnaire was 18 min (±5 min, 9–55 min). The data was collected between April and October 2019.

2.5. Variables

2.5.1. Outcome Variable: Physical Activity Counseling

PA counseling was evaluated based on dichotomous response to the question: “During the last year (12 months), any time you were at the BHU, did you receive PA counseling during the consultation by a health professional (advice, tips, or guidance on PA to change/improve your health)?” (no, yes). This measure has been used in similar studies and adapted to the local context [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

2.5.2. Predictor Variables

Based on the literature review, predictive variables included sociodemographic factors (sex, age group, marital status, skin color, education, and economic level), health conditions (Body Mass Index—BMI, smoking, chronic disease diagnosis, medications consumption), and LTPA [16,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,36]. These variables are described below.

Sociodemographic Characteristics

The sex was observed (male, female), and the participants grouped into three age groups (young adults: 18–39 years, middle-aged adults: 40–59 years, and elderly: ≥60 years old). The marital status was evaluated into three categories (single, married or stable relationship, divorced or widowed) and grouped into two (single, divorced, widowed or married, stable relationship). Skin color was self-reported into five categories (white, black, yellow, brown, and indigenous) and categorized as white and non-white (other categories). Education was evaluated into five levels (illiterate or incomplete elementary I, complete elementary I or incomplete elementary II, complete elementary II or incomplete high school, complete high school or incomplete university and complete university), and then regrouped into three categories: elementary school or less, junior high school, high school or more. All variables were measured according to the method proposed by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics and adopted by the Brazilian Health Surveillance System [37].
Socioeconomic status (SES) was evaluated by a standardized questionnaire [38] which considers ownership of domestic appliances, education level of the family head, having a housekeeper, and public services (water and paved street), and participants were classified into seven levels (A1–higher, A2, B1, B2, C, D, E). However, these categories were grouped into low economic level (SES C + D + E) and high (SES A + B) for analysis purposes.

Health Conditions

The BMI was calculated using self-reported weight and height data and classified into three categories (low or normal weight: ≤24.9 kg/m2, overweight: 25–29.9 kg/m2, obese: ≥30.0 kg/m2) [39]. Smoking habit was evaluated by a dichotomous response (yes, no), while chronic diseases were identified by a self-reported medical diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, or coronary artery disease. In this regard, interviewees were classified into three groups due to the number of chronic diseases (0, 1, ≥2). Finally, respondents reported the continuous use of medication for chronic diseases. In this sense, they were classified into three categories according to the number of medications (0, 1–3, ≥4). These measures are valid and based on the Brazilian Health Surveillance System [37].

Leisure-Time Physical Activity (LTPA)

The PA in a usual week was measured with the leisure module of the long version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [40,41,42]. Participants self-reported the weekly frequency and mean daily volume of walking, moderate, and vigorous PA. The score in each activity/intensity was obtained in minutes per week (min/week) by multiplying the weekly frequency by mean daily volume. Total LTPA was obtained summing min/week of walking + min/week of moderate PA + (min/week of vigorous PA × 2) [41]. Thereby, walking and total LTPA were classified according to WHO guidelines (≥150 min/week) [3].

2.6. Data Quality Control

Quality control of data was assured through six steps. First, all interviewers (members of the research group and undergraduates and students from the Postgraduate Program in Physical Education) received a 20 h theoretical and practical training on technical procedures for interviewing (approaching participants, recording losses and refusals, application of questionnaires, and coding forms) based on an instruction manual prepared by the core project team. The interviewers strictly followed all these procedures; they were blinded to the investigation’s objectives and hypotheses and supervised by a field coordinator. Second, a pilot study was conducted on a random sample of 81 participants from three BHUs to test the data collection procedures and the comprehension of the questions translated from other studies and adapted to the local context. Third, all pilot study participants were re-interviewed at an interval of 7 to 10 days to analyze the temporal stability of the main variables of the study. Temporal stability (reproducibility) of PA counseling was analyzed with percentage agreement and Cohen’s kappa test, which showed 88% agreement and good Kappa value (0.77; p < 0.001). Fourth, data entry was conducted by the field coordinator using the EpiData software (EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark). Fifth, data was cleaned using exploratory analysis, with SPSS software (v. 26.0, IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA), to identify possible typing errors in data entry for each variable, to detect outliers, and to verify all variables’ distributions. Finally, each variable outlier was personally checked in the questionnaire and manually corrected in the database.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analyses were performed using frequency and percentage distributions. The prevalence of PA counseling was described among predictor variables and their associations analyzed by Poisson regression (Prevalence Ratio [PR] and 95% of confidence interval [95% CI]). Initially, variance inflation factor (VIF) tests were performed and rejected the hypothesis of multicollinearity (1/VIF ≥ 0.71). After bivariate analysis, all variables at the same or higher level, which presented a p-value < 0.20, were selected for adjustment by multivariate model. Thus, the final model was conducted following a multiple model analysis, which was elaborated from a hierarchical structure with the following levels and variables: level 1: sociodemographic characteristics; level 2: health conditions; and level 3: LTPA [43]. All analyses were performed using the STATA software (v. 16, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) and at a 5% significance level. The correction for design effect was performed using the command svy to account the estimates of outcome variability.

3. Results

We approached 935 users, the refusal rate was 14% (n = 134), and losses 2% (n = 22), which resulted in 779 participants interviewed. Most participants were women (69.8%), aged between 18–39 years (45.2%), married (64.0%), identified as having white skin color (73.0%), with education level of high school or higher (50.4%), and low economic level (71.2%) (Table 2).
Regarding health conditions, 67.3% of participants were overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), 14.9% smokers, 35.9% hypertensive, 15.7% diabetics, 15.9% dyslipidemic, and 6.5% had received a medical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Just over half of the participants reported zero chronic diseases (54.8%) and consumed one or more prescribed medications (51.3%) (Table 2). Walking and total LTPA ≥150 min/week were reported by 13.4% and 24.8% of participants, respectively. The prevalence of PA counseling was 43.0% (95% CI: 39.5–46.4%) (Table 2).
In the bivariate analysis (Table 3), the sociodemographic characteristics age group (40–59 years, PR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.26–1.84|≥60 years, PR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.29–1.99), marital status (married, PR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.08–1.55), and education (junior high school, PR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57–0.93|complete high school or more, PR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60–0.85) were associated with PA counseling. Regarding health conditions, except for smoking (PR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.59–1.01), all the others showed a positive association with counseling (p < 0.05). Walking (PR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.20–1.73) and total LTPA (PR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.02–1.44) showed a positive association with a higher prevalence of PA counseling.
After adjusting for possible confounding parameters (Table 3), the highest prevalence of counseling was observed among those aged 40–59 years (PR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.19–1.75) and ≥60 years (PR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.14–1.83) and for those married (PR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.07–1.59). However, the education level complete high school or more showed an inverse association with the outcome (PR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68–0.99). Regarding health conditions, people with BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2 (PR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.23–1.90) and those who take continuous use medication (1–3 medications, PR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.47–2.27|≥4 medications, PR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.21–2.28) were more likely to receive PA counseling. Finally, leisure walking was positively associated with PA counseling received by health professionals (PR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.06–1.54).

4. Discussion

Our study aimed to explore the possible factors associated with PA counseling received by adults in BHUs of Primary Health Care in a medium-sized city in southern Brazil. With low risk of bias, the method used allowed us to represent the adult users of BHUs in an urban area, besides exploring the main individual predictors of counseling, analyzing the association’s strength and direction. Also, the variables were measured by standardized procedures and instruments, and these are our study’s strengths. Counseling was higher among middle-aged adults and the elderly, those with less education, married, obese, those who consume medications for chronic diseases, and those who walk in leisure-time. Studies have shown a positive effect of counseling received and PA levels [12,16,17]. Thus, our findings can support specific actions to improve Primary Health Care counseling in Brazil, specifically in BHUs [44,45]. However, PA counseling could be directed towards disadvantaged and less physically active population groups, such as women, the elderly, married, those with less education, those at a low economic level, obese, and users with chronic disease.
Our results showed that the participants had worse health conditions when compared to adults in the capital Curitiba, a city next to São José dos Pinhais (e.g., overweight: 54%, smoking: 11%, hypertension: 21%, diabetes: 7%) [37]. In part, this profile can be explained by characteristics inherent to this population subgroup and by the purpose of seeking medical consultation in BHUs due to current health conditions [8].
About 4 out of 10 users reported receiving PA counseling (43%). A systematic review synthesized Primary Health Care results in several countries and showed an average prevalence of 37% (±14%) [21]. However, in Brazil, population-based studies show average general counseling of 48% (±16%) [23,24,30]. In studies conducted exclusively with BHU users, the prevalence is 42% (±11%) [22,25,26,27,28,29]. The low prevalence found in BHUs can be explained by possible forgetfulness among respondents regarding the received counseling, the structural characteristics of Primary Health Care in the studies, perception of barriers between users of counseling services and health professionals, and lack of protocols for conducting counseling, which could result in different perceptions by users about what was advised [21]. For example, users may not understand health professionals’ guidance in BHUs as an orientation, but merely as an informal recommendation without a technical basis [46].
In our study, middle-aged and elderly adults received more counseling compared to young adults. Many studies have explored these variables, showing consistent results of higher prevalence of PA counseling according to age [22,23,24,25,27,46,47,48]. A higher occurrence of chronic diseases and low PA level can partially explain the greater amount of counseling with advancing age, which could cause health professionals to advise these users to be physically active [24,26,46]. These results are positive, adequate, and expected, since physical inactivity is positively associated with age [2]. However, two studies showed an inverse association between age and counseling [26,49]. The authors justify the possible inconsistency of the association as due to the possible lower confidence that health professionals have in encouraging changed behavior in older people, related PA [26]. In this context, the difference in results between studies suggests that more research is needed to expand knowledge about the relationship between counseling and age [26].
The married status was positively associated with receiving counseling. A few studies have explored this variable and found contradictory associations [22,24,25]. Our results are similar to those found in two studies [22,24], but the authors do not explain the possible causal relationship among these variables. In only one study, the authors justified this association because married individuals are generally older, have chronic diseases, and attend more medical consultations, which might have increased the likelihood of receiving counseling compared to single people [24]. However, regardless of the possible “causal relationship”, since Brazilian married individuals are less physically active in leisure-time [50], the greater amount of counseling among this population subgroup is important and could stimulate PA behavior change.
Regarding education, people who completed high school or more were less likely to receive counseling. These results are not well understood in the literature, as studies have shown that higher education levels were positively associated with counseling [26,36,47]. According to the authors, people with higher education could be more likely to follow counseling properly [47], while individuals with less education would have more difficulty understanding and putting advice into practice [26]. Moreover, some studies have shown an inverse association between counseling and education. Schooling is an essential sociodemographic factor in reducing health care disparities related to PA counseling in Primary Health Care among BHUs users.
The consumption of a high number of medications showed a positive association with counseling. This result is similar to other studies found in the literature [22]. In some of these, the authors report that people who consume more medication often have more health problems, needing more counseling to start or increase PA [22,51]. The authors have suggested that patients consuming lots of medication need more attention and health care and, as a result, receive more counseling from health professionals [51]. We also found that obesity was positively associated with receiving counseling. This is consistent and similar to other studies [24,46,48]. This association can, in part, be explained by the fact that obesity is one of the main risk factors for chronic diseases and because obese people have a negative perception of health, causing health professionals at BHUs to counsel more often [52]. Such a link should alert health professionals to advise people whose needs are not easily visible, whereas this practice is essential for everyone [46].
The positive association between counseling and walking can be explained by the recurrent counseling offered in Primary Health Care [53], especially in Brazil [23,33,54]. Health professionals usually advise their patients to walk for leisure [23,51,53]. Some authors have suggested that leisure is PA domain that can be substantially altered by counseling interventions when compared, for example, to the occupational domain [44]. These results can also be partially explained by the lack of knowledge of health professionals in BHUs on recommendations in other PA domains [13]. This is likely due to professionals’ low confidence in advising other PA types for their patients (exercises for muscle strengthening, running, cycling). This characteristic highlights the importance of having a physical education professional in Primary Health Care units as part of the health team [14,32,33]. Thereby, people whom other health professionals had instructed to start or increase PA could seek a specialist during their consultations at BHUs, thus receiving detailed information on other possible activities to be performed (e.g., domains and types of PA, frequency, intensity, daily or weekly volume, progression) [20]. Alternatively, this could reduce time spent in sedentary behavior at home, work, and daily commuting [24,32]. Analyzing the association between counseling and PA is relevant since many people Brazilian populations do not have enough financial resources to cover tuition for personalized guidance services and private establishments, such as clubs and gyms, for PA [25,55]. Thus, adequate physician guidance could, for example, encourage BHU users to practice PA in public open spaces in the neighborhood (e.g., walking or bike paths, fitness zones in urban parks) [4,5].
Contrary to what was expected, some predictors (e.g., sex, economic level, chronic diseases) had no association with counseling received. However, other studies have pointed to a positive association between some of these factors and counseling [24,49]. Such results can be positively interpreted because, although individuals with disease need differentiated care, users receive counseling equally regardless of diseases [51]. According to Primary Health Care principles in Brazil, one should not seek only curative actions, but also preventive health promotion actions with universality, integrality, equity, etc. [7,9].
Our results must be interpreted considering some limitations. The sample was restricted to adult BHU users from an urban area of a medium-sized city in southern Brazil. This city has a broad rural area (79% of the territory), comprising 12 BHUs. Thus, our findings cannot be extrapolated to other contexts (e.g., rural areas, larger cities, other states or regions of Brazil, and other countries). There were no physical education professionals in the health teams or PA programs of the selected BHUs. These may, in part, have altered the prevalence of counseling received, as well as associations between counseling and PA [33,54]. Finally, the cross-sectional design limits establishment of causality among the predictors and analyzed outcome.

5. Conclusions

The prevalence of PA counseling was 43%, and the populational groups more exposed to counseling were middle-aged and elderly adults, married, those with less education, obese, those who consume medications and walk in leisure-time.
Primary Health Care actions in Brazilian BHUs should be expanded, with health professionals’ training towards promoting PA, emphasizing epidemiology, public health, and PA in addition to developing counseling methods in routine service, with valid and useful protocols to evaluate actions’ effectiveness [19]. Health professionals should also know about public open spaces and structures for PA near the BHUs to recommend patients practice PA in these places [4,5]. Future studies should evaluate the effectiveness of different counseling actions regarding PA levels for different population groups due to differences in lifestyle between urban and rural areas, large and small cities, different regions in Brazil, and other countries. It is just as essential to develop PA counseling routines and protocols that different health professionals can use.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.P.S., A.T.S., C.R.R., R.C.F.; methodology, L.P.S., C.R.R., R.C.F.; pilot study, L.P.S., R.C.F.; formal analysis, L.P.S., R.C.F.; resources, R.C.F.; writing—original drafting preparation, L.P.S.; writing—review, L.P.S., A.T.S., C.R.R., R.C.F.; writing—review and editing, R.C.F.; supervision, R.C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki’s guidelines and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Pontifical Catholic University of Parana (protocol code 2.882.260 and date of approval 10 September 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Research Group members in Environment, Physical Activity, and Health (GPAAFS) for help in data collection and the Municipality of São José dos Pinhais for their collaboration on the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ding, D.; Lawson, K.D.; Kolbe-Alexander, T.L.; Finkelstein, E.A.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Van Mechelen, W.; Pratt, M. The economic burden of physical inactivity: A global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet 2016, 388, 1311–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Guthold, R.; Stevens, G.A.; Riley, L.M.; Bull, F.C. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, 1077–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. WHO. World Health Organization. Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/337001 (accessed on 3 January 2021).
  4. ISPAH. International Society for Physical Activity and Health. ISPAH’s Eigth Investments That Work for Physical Activity. Available online: https://www.ispah.org/resources/key-resources/8-investments/ (accessed on 12 December 2020).
  5. Ding, D.; Varela, A.R.; Bauman, A.E.; Ekelund, U.; Lee, I.-M.; Heath, G.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Reis, R.; Pratt, M. Towards better evidence-informed global action: Lessons learnt from the Lancet Series and recent developments in physical activity and public health. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Heath, C.H.; Parra, D.C.; Sarmiento, O.L.; Andersen, L.B.; Owen, N.; Goenka, S.; Montes, F.; Brownson, R.C. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: Lessons from around the world. Lancet 2012, 380, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Giovanella, L.; Franco, C.M.; Almeida, P.F. National primary health care policy: Where are we headed to? Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 2020, 25, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. IBGE. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. National Health Survey 2019. Primary Health Care and Anthropometric Information. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101748.pdf (accessed on 12 December 2020).
  9. Paim, J.; Travassos, C.; Almeida, C.; Bahia, L.; MacInko, J. The Brazilian Health System: History, advances, and challenges. Lancet 2011, 377, 1778–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jin, J. Counseling on healthy diet and physical activity to prevent cardiovascular disease. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020, 324, 2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Krist, A.H.; Davidson, K.W.; Mangione, C.M.; Barry, M.J.; Cabana, M.; Caughey, A.B.; Donahue, K.; Doubeni, C.A.; Epling, J.W., Jr.; Kubik, M.; et al. Behavioral counseling interventions to promote a healthy diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020, 324, 2069–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. O’Connor, E.A.; Evans, C.V.; Rushkin, M.C.; Redmond, N.; Lin, J.S. Behavioral counseling to promote a healthy diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020, 324, 2076–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Florindo, A.A.; Mielke, G.I.; Gomes, G.A.O.; Ramos, L.R.; Bracco, M.M.; Parra, D.C.; Simões, E.J.; Lobelo, F.; Hallal, P.C. Physical activity counseling in primary health care in Brazil: A national study on prevalence and associated factors. BMC Public Health 2013, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Florindo, A.A.; Costa, E.F.; Sa, T.H.; Santos, T.I.; Velardi, M.; Andrade, D.R. Physical activity promotion in primary health care in Brazil: A counseling model applied to community health workers. J. Phys. Act. Health 2014, 11, 1531–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Florindo, A.A.; Andrade, D.R.; Guerra, P.H.; Mota, J.; Crone, D.; Mafra, A.C.C.N.; Bracco, M.M. Physical activity promotion by health practitioners: A distance-learning training component to improve knowledge and counseling. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 2018, 19, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gagliardi, A.R.; Faulkner, G.; Ciliska, D.; Hicks, A. Factors contributing to the effectiveness of physical activity counselling in primary care: A realist systematic review. Patient Educ. Couns. 2015, 98, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Orrow, G.; Kinmonth, A.L.; Sanderson, S.; Sutton, S. Effectiveness of physical activity promotion based in primary care: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 2012, 344, e1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Pinto, B.M.; Goldstein, M.G.; Marcus, B.H. Activity counseling by primary care physicians. Prev. Med. 1998, 27, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Heath, G.W.; Kolade, V.O.; Haynes, J.W. Exercise is MedicineTM: A pilot study linking primary care with community physical activity support. Prev. Med. Rep. 2015, 2, 492–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Crump, C.; Sundquist, K.; Sundquist, J.; Winkleby, M.A. Exercise is Medicine: Primary care counseling on aerobic fitness and muscle strengthening. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2019, 32, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Moraes, S.Q.; Souza, J.H.; Araújo, P.A.B.; Rech, C.R. Prevalence of physical activity counseling in primary health care: A systematic review. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Física Saúde 2019, 24, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Siqueira, F.V.; Nahas, M.V.; Facchini, L.A.; Silveira, D.S.; Piccini, R.X.; Tomasi, E.; Thumé, E.; Hallal, P.C. Counseling for physical activity as a health education strategy. Cad. Saúde Pública 2009, 25, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Hallal, P.C.; Machado, P.T.; Del Duca, G.F.; Silva, I.G.; Amorim, T.C.; Borges, T.T.; Rombaldi, A.J.; Azevedo, M.R.; Knuth, A.G. Physical activity advice: Short report from a population-based study in Brazil. J. Phys. Act. Health 2010, 7, 352–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Duro, S.M.; Tomasi, E.; Siqueira, F.V.; Silveira, D.S.; Thumé, E.; Facchini, L.A. Adult physical activity counseling by health professionals in Brazil: A national urban population survey. J. Phys. Act. Health 2015, 12, 1177–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Häfele, V.; Siqueira, F.V. Physical activity counseling and change of behavior in Basic Health Units. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Física Saúde 2016, 21, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Barbosa, J.M.V.; Souza, W.V.; Ferreira, R.W.M.; Carvalho, E.M.F.; Cesse, E.A.P.; Fontbonne, A. Correlates of physical activity counseling by health providers to patients with diabetes and hypertension attended by the Family Health Strategy in the State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Prim. Care Diabetes 2017, 11, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lopes, A.C.S.; Toledo, M.T.T.; Câmara, A.M.C.S.; Menzel, H.-J.K.; Santos, L.C. Health conditions and counseling on diet and physical activity in Primary Care in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2014, 23, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Santos, R.P.; Horta, P.M.; Souza, C.S.; Santos, C.A.; Oliveira, H.B.S.; Almeida, L.M.R.; Santos, L.C. Counseling on food and physical activity: Practice and adherence of primary care users. Rev. Gaúcha Enferm. 2012, 33, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Toledo, M.T.T.; De Deus, R.; Mendonça, M.N.; Abreu Lopes, A.C.S. Counseling on healthy ways of life in primary health care. Mundo Saude 2017, 41, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Flores, T.R.; Gomes, A.P.; Soares, A.L.G.; Nunes, B.P.; Assunção, M.C.F.; Gonçalves, H.; Bertoldi, A.D. Counseling by health professionals and healthy behaviors among the elderly: Population-based study in Pelotas, South of Brazil, 2014. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde 2018, 27, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Silva, A.T.; Santos, L.P.; Rodriguez-Añez, C.R.; Fermino, R.C. Logic model of Cidade Ativa, Cidade Saudável Program in São José dos Pinhais, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Física Saúde 2021, 26, e0193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carvalho, F.F.B.; Nogueira, J.A.D. Physical activity and corporal practices from the perspective of Health Promotion in Primary Care. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva 2016, 21, 1829–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Gomes, G.O.; Kokubun, E.; Mielke, G.I.; Ramos, L.R.; Pratt, M.; Parra, D.C.; Simões, E.; Florindo, A.A.; Bracco, M.; Cruz, D.; et al. Characteristics of physical activity programs in the Brazilian primary health care system. Cad. Saúde Pública 2014, 30, 2155–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. IBGE. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Statistics of Cities and States. Available online: https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados (accessed on 18 January 2021).
  35. Luiz, R.R.; Magnanini, M.M.F. The logic of sample size determination in epidemiological research. Cad. Saúde Coletiva 2000, 8, 9–28. [Google Scholar]
  36. Glasgow, R.E.; Eakin, E.G.; Fisher, E.B.; Bacak, S.J.; Brownson, R.C. Physician advice and support for physical activity: Results from a national survey. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2001, 21, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brasil. Ministry of Health, Secretariat of Health Surveillance. Department of Health Analysis and Surveillance of Noncommunicable Diseases. VIGITEL Brasil 2019: Surveillance System for Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey. Brasilia-DF. 2020. Available online: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2019_vigilancia_fatores_risco.pdf (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  38. ABEP. Brazilian Association of Research Companies. Brazil Economic Classification Criteria 2019. Available online: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil (accessed on 2 May 2020).
  39. WHO. World Health Organization Expert Committee on Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Available online: https://www.who.int/childgrowth/publications/physical_status/en/ (accessed on 17 April 2021).
  40. Matsudo, S.; Araujo, T.; Matsudo, V.; Andrade, D.; Andrade, E.; Oliveira, L.C.; Braggion, C. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): Study of validity and reliability in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Física Saúde 2001, 6, 5–18. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hallal, P.C.; Gomez, L.F.; Parra, D.C.; Lobelo, F.; Mosquera, J.; Florindo, A.A.; Reis, R.S.; Pratt, M.; Sarmiento, O.L. Lessons learned after 10 years of IPAQ use in Brazil and Colombia. J. Phys. Act. Health 2010, 7, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Craig, C.L.; Marshall, A.L.; Sjöström, M.; Bauman, A.E.; Booth, M.L.; Ainsworth, B.E.; Pratt, M.; Ekelund, U.; Yngve, A.; Sallis, J.F.; et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 5, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Victora, C.G.; Huttly, S.R.; Fuchs, S.C.; Olinto, M.T. The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: A hierarchical approach. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 26, 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ribeiro, E.H.C.; Garcia, L.M.T.; Salvador, E.P.; Costa, E.; Andrade, D.R.; Latorre, M.R.D.O.; Florindo, A.A. Assessment of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in the Brazilian Unified Health System. Rev. Saúde Pública 2017, 51, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Polo, M.C.E.; Tavares, G.H.; Kanitz, A.C.; Sebastião, E.; Papini, C.B. Effectiveness of exercise and health education interventions in Brazilian primary health care. Motriz. Rev. Educ. Fis. 2020, 26, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kreuter, M.W.; Scharff, D.P.; Brennan, L.K.; Lukwago, S.N. Physician recommendations for diet and physical activity: Which patients get advised to change? Prev. Med. 1997, 26, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ahmed, N.U.; Delgado, M.; Saxena, A. Trends and disparities in the prevalence of physicians’ counseling on exercise among the U.S. adult population, 2000–2010. Prev. Med. 2017, 99, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Barnes, P.M.; Schoenborn, C.A. Trends in adults receiving a recommendation for exercise or other physical activity from a physician or other health professional. NCHS Data Brief. 2012, 86, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  49. Croteau, K.; Schofield, G.; McLean, G. Physical activity advice in the primary care setting: Results of a population study in New Zealand. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2006, 30, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Andrade, A.M.C.S.; Peixoto, S.V.; Friche, A.A.; Goston, J.L.; César, C.C.; Xavier, C.C.; Proietti, F.A.; Roux, A.V.D.; Caiaffa, W.T. Social context of neighborhood and socioeconomic status on leisure-time physical activity in a Brazilian urban center: The BH Health Study. Cad. Saúde Pública 2015, 31, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Häfele, V.; Siqueira, F.V. Interventions with health professionals of primary care about physical activity counseling: Systematic review. J. Phys. Educ. 2019, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Honda, K. Factors underlying variation in receipt of physician advice on diet and exercise: Applications of the behavioral model of health care utilization. Am. J. Health Promot. 2004, 18, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Martínez-Gómez, D.; León-Muñoz, L.M.; Guallar-Castillón, P.; López-García, E.; Aguilera, M.T.; Banegas, J.R.; Rodríguez-Artalejo, F. Reach and equity of primary care-based counseling to promote walking among the adult population of Spain. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2013, 16, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ramos, L.R.; Malta, D.C.; Gomes, G.A.O.; Bracco, M.M.; Florindo, A.A.; Mielke, G.I.; Parra, D.C.; Lobelo, F.; Simões, E.J.; Hallal, P.C. Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil. Rev. Saúde Pública 2014, 48, 837–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Rech, C.R.; Camargo, E.M.; Araujo, P.A.B.; Loch, M.R.; Reis, R.S. Perceived barriers to leisure-time physical activity in the Brazilian population. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte 2018, 24, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Socioeconomic, health-related, and demographic indicators of São José dos Pinhais, Curitiba, and Brazil.
Table 1. Socioeconomic, health-related, and demographic indicators of São José dos Pinhais, Curitiba, and Brazil.
VariablesSão José dos PinhaisCuritibaBrazil
Estimated population in 2020329,0581,948,626211,755,692
Women51%52%51%
Child mortality10.6%11.9%16.7%
Illiteracy (≥15 years)3.4%2.1%9.6%
Schooling (6–14 years)97.4%97.6%99.3%
Human Development Index0.7580.8230.727
Per capita income (BRL)846.91581.0767.0
Gini index per capita0.45990.56520.6086
Table
Table 2. Descriptive characteristics of adults in Primary Health Care units. São José dos Pinhais, Parana, Southern Brazil, 2019 (n = 779).
Table 2. Descriptive characteristics of adults in Primary Health Care units. São José dos Pinhais, Parana, Southern Brazil, 2019 (n = 779).
VariableCategoryn%
Sociodemographic characteristics
SexFemale54469.8
Male23530.2
Age group (years)18–3934645.2
40–5928336.9
≥6013717.9
Marital statusSingle28036.0
Married49764.0
Skin colorWhite56673.0
Non-white20927.0
Education levelElementary education or less24731.7
Junior high school13917.8
High school or more 39350.4
Economic levelLow55571.2
High22428.8
Health conditions
Body mass index (kg/m2)<24.924832.2
25–29.929137.4
≥30.023029.9
SmokingNo66085.1
Yes11614.9
HypertensionNo49964.1
Yes28035.9
DiabetesNo65784.3
Yes12215.7
DyslipidemiaNo65584.1
Yes12415.9
Coronary artery disease No72893.5
Yes516.5
Number of chronic diseases042754.8
120426.2
≥214819.0
Number of prescribed medications 038749.7
1–327735.6
≥411514.8
Leisure-time physical activity (LTPA)
Walking (min/week)<15067586.6
≥15010413.4
Total LTPA (min/week)<15058675.2
≥15019324.8
PA counseling received by a health professionalNo44457.0
Yes33543.0
PA: physical activity.
Table
Table 3. Associated factors with physical activity counseling among adults in Primary Health Care units. São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Southern Brazil, 2019 (n = 779).
Table 3. Associated factors with physical activity counseling among adults in Primary Health Care units. São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Southern Brazil, 2019 (n = 779).
VariablesCategoryPrevalence of PA Counseling (%)Bivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
PR (95% CI)pPR (95% CI)p
Level 1—Sociodemographic characteristics
SexFemale43.61
Male41.70.95 (0.80–1.14)0.632--
Age group (years)18–3933.21 1 a
40–5950.91.53 (1.26–1.84)<0.0011.44 (1.19–1.75)<0.001
≥6053.31.60 (1.29–1.99)<0.0011.44 (1.14–1.83)0.002
Marital statusSingle36.11 1 b
Married46.71.29 (1.08–1.55)0.0061.27 (1.07–1.59)0.007
Skin colorWhite41.91
Non-white46.41.11 (0.93–1.32)0.249--
Education levelElementary education or less53.01 1 c
Junior high school38.80.73 (0.57–0.93)0.0110.82 (0.64–1.04)0.109
High school or more 38.20.72 (0.60–0.85)<0.0010.82 (0.68–0.99)0.039
Economic levelLow44.01 --
High40.60.92 (0.76–1.11)0.400--
Level 2—Health conditions
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)<24.932.71 1 d
25–29.939.21.20 (0.95–1.50)0.1201.09 (0.87–1.37)0.456
≥30.059.11.81 (1.47–2.23)<0.0011.53 (1.23–1.90)<0.001
SmokingNo44.51 1 e
Yes34.50.78 (0.59–1.01)0.0590.85 (0.66–1.09)0.205
HypertensionNo36.71 1 f
Yes54.31.48 (1.26–1.73)<0.0010.94 (0.77–1.15)0.549
DiabetesNo40.31 1 g
Yes57.41.42 (1.18–1.70)<0.0010.91 (0.74–1.13)0.384
DyslipidemiaNo39.71 1 h
Yes60.51.52 (1.28–1.80)<0.0011.15 (0.94–1.40)0.179
Coronary artery diseaseNo42.01 1 i
Yes56.91.35 (1.05–1.74)0.0201.01 (0.78–1.30)0.938
Number of chronic diseases033.31 1 j
151.51.55 (1.28–1.87)<0.0011.18 (0.94–1.47)0.154
≥259.51.79 (1.48–1.87)<0.0011.11 (0.83–1.47)0.483
Number of medications028.71 1 k
1–357.42.00 (1.66–2.41)<0.0011.83 (1.47–2.27)<0.001
≥456.51.97 (1.57–2.46)<0.0011.66 (1.21–2.28)0.002
Level 3—Leisure-time physical activity (LTPA)
Walking (min/week)<15040.61 1 l
≥15058.71.45 (1.20–1.73)<0.0011.28 (1.06–1.54)0.010
Total LTPA (min/week)<15040.81 1 l
≥15049.71.22 (1.02–1.44)0.0241.16 (0.98–1.37)0.094
a adjusted by marital status and education level. b adjusted by age group and education level. c adjusted by age group and marital status. d adjusted by age group, marital status, education level, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and number of medications. e adjusted by age group, marital status, education level, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and number of medications. f adjusted by age group, marital status, education level, BMI, smoking, diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and number of medications. g adjusted by age group, marital status, education level, BMI, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and number of medications. h adjusted by age group, marital status, education level, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and number of medications. I adjusted by age group, marital status, education level, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and number of medications. j adjusted by age group, marital status, education level, BMI, smoking, and number of medications. k adjusted by age group, marital status, education level, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease. l adjusted by age group, marital status, education level, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and number of medications.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, L.P.d.; Silva, A.T.d.; Rech, C.R.; Fermino, R.C. Physical Activity Counseling among Adults in Primary Health Care Centers in Brazil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5079. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105079

AMA Style

Santos LPd, Silva ATd, Rech CR, Fermino RC. Physical Activity Counseling among Adults in Primary Health Care Centers in Brazil. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(10):5079. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, Letícia Pechnicki dos, Alice Tatiane da Silva, Cassiano Ricardo Rech, and Rogério César Fermino. 2021. "Physical Activity Counseling among Adults in Primary Health Care Centers in Brazil" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 10: 5079. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105079

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop