Next Article in Journal
Teaching Approaches to Learn Theoretical Contents in Physical Education: A Study about Contour Lines
Next Article in Special Issue
Health Literacy for Cardiac Rehabilitation: An Examination of Associated Illness Perceptions, Self-Efficacy, Motivation and Physical Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Selecting Indicators to Monitor and Assess Environmental Health in a Portuguese Urban Setting: A Participatory Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Generic Health Literacy Measurements for Adults: A Scoping Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 22
10.3390/ijerph17228598
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health Literacy and Preventive Behaviors Modify the Association between Pre-Existing Health Conditions and Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms: A Multi-Institutional Survey

by
Tan T. Nguyen
1,2,†,
Nga T. Le
3,†,
Minh H. Nguyen
4,
Linh V. Pham
5,6,
Binh N. Do
7,8,
Hoang C. Nguyen
9,10,
Huu C. Nguyen
11,12,
Tung H. Ha
13,
Hung K. Dao
14,
Phuoc B. Nguyen
15,
Manh V. Trinh
16,
Thinh V. Do
17,
Hung Q. Nguyen
18,
Thao T. P. Nguyen
19,20,
Nhan P. T. Nguyen
21,
Cuong Q. Tran
22,23,
Khanh V. Tran
24,
Trang T. Duong
25,
Thu T. M. Pham
26,27 and
Tuyen Van Duong
28,*
1
Department of Orthopedics, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho 941-17, Vietnam
2
Director Office, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Can Tho 941-17, Vietnam
3
Allied Health & Human Performance, Higher Degree Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
4
International Ph.D. Program in Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110-31, Taiwan
5
Department of Pulmonary & Cardiovascular Diseases, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hai Phong 042-12, Vietnam
6
Director Office, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hai Phong 042-12, Vietnam
7
Department of Infectious Diseases, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi 121-08, Vietnam
8
Division of Military Science, Military Hospital 103, Hanoi 121-08, Vietnam
9
Director Office, Thai Nguyen National Hospital, Thai Nguyen City 241-24, Vietnam
10
President Office, Thai Nguyen University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Nguyen City 241-17, Vietnam
11
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, E Hospital, Hanoi 113-08, Vietnam
12
Director Office, E Hospital, Hanoi 113-08, Vietnam
13
Director Office, General Hospital of Agricultural, Hanoi 125-16, Vietnam
14
Director Office, Bac Ninh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Bac Ninh 161-23, Vietnam
15
Director Office, Kien An Hospital, Hai Phong 046-09, Vietnam
16
Director Office, Quang Ninh General Hospital, Quang Ninh 011-08, Vietnam
17
Director Office, Bai Chay Hospital, Quang Ninh 011-21, Vietnam
18
Director Office, Quang Ninh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Quang Ninh 011-24, Vietnam
19
Health Management Training Institute, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thua Thien Hue 491-20, Vietnam
20
Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, 1093 Budapest, Hungary
21
General Planning Department, Da Nang Oncology Hospital, Da Nang 506-06, Vietnam
22
Director Office, Thu Duc District Health Center, Ho Chi Minh City 713-10, Vietnam
23
Faculty of Health, Mekong University, Vinh Long 852-16, Vietnam
24
Director Office, Hospital District 2, Ho Chi Minh City 711-13, Vietnam
25
Nursing Office, Tan Phu District Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City 720-16, Vietnam
26
Faculty of Public Health, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hai Phong 042-12, Vietnam
27
School of Public Health, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110-31, Taiwan
28
School of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110-31, Taiwan
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(22), 8598; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228598
Submission received: 1 November 2020 / Revised: 17 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 November 2020 / Published: 19 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Global Health Literacy)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
People with pre-existing health conditions (PEHC) are vulnerable to viral infection while health literacy (HL) and preventive behaviors (PB) have been shown to benefit people during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to examine the association between PEHC and suspected COVID-19 symptoms (S-COVID-19-S), and to investigate the modification effect of HL and PB. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 8291 participants visiting outpatient departments at 18 hospitals and health centers across Vietnam from 14 February to 31 May 2020. Data were collected regarding participant’s characteristics, HL, PB, PEHC, and S-COVID-19-S. Regression models were used for analyzing the associations. Results showed that people with PEHC had a 3.38 times higher likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S (odds ratio, OR, 3.38; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 3.01, 3.79; p < 0.001). In comparison to participants without PEHC and with the lowest HL score, those with PEHC and one HL score increment had a 7% lower likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92, 0.94; p < 0.001). In comparison to participants without PEHC and not adhering to mask wearing, those with PEHC and adhering to mask wearing had a 77% lower likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.16, 0.32; p < 0.001). Higher HL and adherence to mask wearing can protect people from having S-COVID-19-S, especially in those with PEHC.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic causes devastating healthcare and economic impacts on countries [1,2,3,4]. Pre-existing health conditions (PEHC) such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were pointed out to increase the risk of COVID-19 infection [5,6,7], and worsen the prognosis of COVID-19 infection [8,9]. People with COVID-19 and PEHC are more susceptible to die from COVID-19 [10,11].
Coronavirus has been indicated to be transmitted via the contact with virus-containing secretions expelled through expiratory human activities of infected persons such as breathing, talking, sneezing, coughing, and singing [12,13]. Thus, it is a matter of great concern and necessary to explore preventive factors that help to reduce the occurrence of viral infection.
Health literacy (HL) is defined as individuals’ perceptions, knowledge, and ability to understand, access, appraise, and apply health information into disease prevention and treatment in their life course in order to improve their quality of life [14]. Low HL is associated with worse health decisions and outcomes [15,16,17]. People with low HL have difficulties communicating effectively with health care providers [18]. This requires more efforts from physicians to communicate in colloquial language to promote patients’ involvement in shared decision-making [19]. People with high HL have been shown to be more likely to adopt protective methods and have the preparedness to get protected from the COVID-19 infection [15].
Preventive behaviors such as mask wearing, hand washing, and physical distancing have been recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) [12] and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [20] as effective personal methods to protect people from COVID-19 infection. These preventive behaviors have been indicated to significantly reduce the risk of viral transmission and infection in previous studies [21,22,23]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 172 observational studies across 16 countries and six continents supports the physical distancing and face masking that prove to be beneficial for preventing the infection [24]. In addition, wearing mask and washing hands with soap helps reduce the transmission of viruses [25].
Health literacy and preventive behaviors have shown the protective effects in containing the COVID-19 pandemic. However, their roles on controlling the infection in people with pre-existing health conditions remain to be explored. Therefore, in this study, we examined the association between pre-existing health conditions (PEHC) and suspected COVID-19 symptoms (S-COVID-19-S), and we investigated the effect modification of health literacy (HL) and preventive behaviors (PB) on the association between PEHC and S-COVID-19-S among outpatient department visitors in 18 hospitals and health centers across Vietnam during the pandemic.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design

A cross-sectional study was conducted on adults visiting the outpatient department (OPD) at 18 hospitals and health centers across Vietnam from 14 February to 31 May 2020. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Committee of Hanoi University of Public Health, Vietnam (IRB No. 029/2020/YTCC-HD3 for the first period from 14 February to 31 March 2020, and IRB No. 133/2020/YTCC-HD3 for the second period from 1 April to 31 May 2020).

2.2. Study Sample

Adults who visited the OPD, aged from 18 to 85 years old with Vietnamese listening and reading proficiency, were invited to join our survey. We excluded individuals with any emergency condition (e.g., positive with COVID-19, injuries from traffic accident, appendicitis, etc.), having a psychotic disorder, dementia, or blindness. The data collection procedures were described in a previous publication [26].
A total of 8291 participants from 18 hospitals and health centers across Vietnam, including 1028 from Military Hospital 103, 183 from E hospital, and 300 from General Hospital of Agricultural, in Hanoi; 469 from Thai Nguyen National Hospital, in Thai Nguyen Province; 500 from Bac Ninh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, in Bac Ninh city; 982 from Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, 492 from Kien An Hospital, and 484 from Kien Thuy District Health Center, in Haiphong city; 309 from Quang Ninh General Hospital, 364 from Bai Chay Hospital, and 280 from Quang Ninh Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, in Quang Ninh province; 495 from Trieu Phong District Health Center, Quang Tri province; 421 from Da Nang Oncology Hospital, in Da Nang city; 489 from Thu Duc District Hospital, 497 from Thu Duc District Health Center, 248 from Hospital District 2, and 242 from Tan Phu District Hospital, in Ho Chi Minh city; and 508 from Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, in Can Tho city.

2.3. Instruments and Measurements

2.3.1. Participant Characteristics

Participants were asked for socio-demographic information, including age (18–39, 40–64, 65–80 years old), gender (women, men), education attainment (junior high school or below, senior high school, college/university level or above), occupation (employed, own business, others), ability to pay for medication (very or fairly difficult, very or fairly easy to pay), and social status (low, middle and high). Body height (cm) and weight (kg) of participants was measured. Body mass index was calculated as (weight (kg))/(height (m))2.

2.3.2. Health Literacy

The short version of the health literacy questionnaire (HLS-SF12) consisting of 12 items was used to assess the health literacy of participants in our study. This health literacy questionnaire has been validated and used for the general population (aged ≥ 15 years, both sexes) in Asia [27], including Vietnam [28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Participants responded to each item on 4-point Likert scales from 1 = very difficult to 4 = very easy. The HL index was standardized to a unified metric from 0 to 50, with a higher score that represents better health literacy, using the following Formula (1):
Index = (Mean − 1) × (50/3)
where Index is the calculated HL index, Mean is the mean of all participating items for each individual, 1 is the possible minimum value of the mean (leading to a minimum value of the index equals 0), 3 is the range of the mean, and 50 is the chosen maximum value of the new metric. A higher HL index indicates a better HL level [27,35].

2.3.3. Preventive Behaviors

Participants were asked about their performance of preventive behaviors, including washing hands with soap or sanitizer when touching objects suspected to be contaminated or after going outside [20,36], wearing mask when going outside [20,36], and performing physical distancing (at least 2 m or 6 feet to people around) [37] since the COVID-19 outbreak started from the 23 January 2020 in Vietnam. The frequency of performing each behavior was rated on five levels (never, rarely, occasionally, often, and always/usually). Always/usually performing each preventive behavior during the COVID-19 outbreak was defined as adherence to that behavior [20]. Not always/usually (never, rarely, occasionally, or often) performing a preventive behavior was considered as non-adherence to that behavior.

2.3.4. Pre-Existing Health Condition

Participants self-reported their pre-existing health condition (PEHC). The PEHC were assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index items [38], including myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, peripheral disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes without complications, depression, taking anticoagulants (for cardiovascular disease, thrombosis), hemiplegia, diabetes with complications, moderate or severe renal disease, tumor without metastasis, moderate or severe liver disease, solid metastatic tumor, and HIV/AIDS. Participants with one or more of these conditions when presented at the OPD were classified as having PEHC.

2.3.5. Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms

Participants reported their health problems that are similar symptoms of COVID-19, including fever, cough, dyspnea, myalgia, fatigue, sputum production, confusion, headache, sore throat, rhinorrhea, chest pain, hemoptysis, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting [39]. Individuals having one of those symptoms when visiting the OPD were classified as having suspected COVID-19 symptoms or symptoms like COVID-19 [33]. This did not imply that participants were suspected of having COVID-19.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Firstly, the Chi-square test was used to compare the proportion of S-COVID-19-S by different categorical variables, including participant characteristics (age, gender, marital status, education, occupation, social status, ability to pay medication, BMI), PEHC, and PB (mask wearing, hand washing, physical distancing) in studied participants. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to examine the distribution of continuous variables, including the HL index. Secondly, unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were performed to explore the associations of PEHC, PB, and HL with S-COVID-19-S. The factors significantly associated with having S-COVID-19-S at p < 0.05 via bivariate logistic regression were considered as confounding factors and were adjusted in the multivariate model. To avoid multicollinearity, the correlations between covariates were examined. If the Spearman’s rho ≥ 0.3 exists between covariates, one representative variable was selected into the multivariate model. Finally, the interactions between HL, PB, and PEHC on having S-COVID-19-S were examined using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models. All statistical analysis was performed by SPSS Version 20.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), and a p < 0.05 was set as significance.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Studied Participants

Out of all participants, the proportions of PEHC, adherence to mask wearing, hand washing, and social distancing were 22.6%, 44.2%, 24.3%, and 20.6%, respectively. The proportion of S-COVID-19-S was 37.7% (3129/8291). This proportion was significantly differed by participants’ age, marital status, education, occupation, ability to pay, social status, and preventive behaviors. People with S-COVID-19-S had a lower health literacy score than those without S-COVID-19-S (Table 1).

3.2. Associations between Health Literacy, Preventive Behaviors, and Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms

In the bivariate logistic analysis, participants with PEHC had a higher likelihood of having S-COVID-19 while those who adhered to PB had lower likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S than their counterparts (p < 0.001; Table 2). The association between associated factors and S-COVID-19-S was fully presented in Table S1. Age, education, marital status, occupation, ability to pay for medication, social status, and BMI were found to be significantly associated with the risk of having S-COVID-19-S (p < 0.05). To avoid multicollinearity, Spearman correlations among factors were examined. A moderate correlation between age and education level (Spearman’s rho: −0.41), and between age and marital status (Spearman’s rho: 0.38) were found (Table S2). Hence, education attainment and marital status were excluded, and finally, age, occupation, ability to pay for medication, social status, and BMI were selected into multivariate model.
After adjusting for selected variables, PEHC was significantly associated with a 3.38 times higher likelihood of S-COVID-19-S (odds ratio, OR, 3.38; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 3.01, 3.79; p < 0.001). Participants who adhered to mask wearing (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.31, 0.41; p < 0.001), hand washing (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.32, 0.45; p < 0.001), physical distancing (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.42; p < 0.001), and with 1-score increment of HL (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94, 0.96; p < 0.001) had a lower likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S, respectively (Table 2).

3.3. Effect Modifications of Health Literacy and Preventive Behaviors

In comparison to participants without PEHC and the lowest HL score, those with PEHC and lowest HL score had a 16.53 times higher likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S, while a 1-score increment of HL resulted in a 7% lower likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92, 0.94; p < 0.001). Similarly, in comparison to participants without PEHC and not adhering to mask wearing, those with PEHC and not adhering to mask wearing had a 17.42 times higher likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S, while those with PEHC and adhering to mask wearing resulted in a 77% lower likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.16, 0.32; p < 0.001; Table 3). The modifying effect of adherence to hand washing or social distancing to lower the likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S was not found (p > 0.05; Table 3).

4. Discussion

In this study, we found that participants with pre-existing health conditions (PEHC) had a significantly higher risk of having S-COVID-19-S than ones without PEHC. Participants, who adhered to performing preventive behaviors and who had higher health literacy scores had a lower risk of having S-COVID-19-S compared to their counterparts. Even though we did not study the symptoms of COVID-19, the symptoms like COVID-19 could possibly help to explore the associations and raise the awareness of the public. A meta-analysis of 1558 patients with COVID-19 showed that patients with certain underlying medical conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cerebrovascular disease had a higher risk of having COVID-19 than those without these illnesses [6]. Besides, patients with comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), were prone to develop more severe progression of COVID-19 infection [6,9].
Preventive behaviors such as wearing mask, washing hands with soap, and performing physical distancing were proven to be effective in reducing the COVID-19 transmission and infection. A systematic review collecting 172 observational studies across 16 countries and six continents proved that lengthened physical distancing of at least two meters in public places has more effectively reduced the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and beta coronaviruses (SARS-CoV or MERS-CoV) compared to a closer distance that is less than two meters [24]. Wearing mask and washing hands limit the contact with virus-containing secretion from infected people, thus wearing mask and washing hands with soap have been strongly recommended in the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 [40]. Mask wearing and hand washing have also been shown to be preventive measures to reduce the transmission of viruses during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) [25,41] and novel influenza A (H1N1) pandemic [42].
Regarding health literacy (HL), a study of behavioral reactions to the H1N1 influenza pandemic showed that individuals who had perceptions of the effectiveness of preventive behaviors, such as washing hands with warm water and soap, using a napkin when sneezing, and avoidance responses such as avoiding crowd places and public transportation were more likely have a reduced risk of having the viral infection [43]. The possible explanation was that individuals with a high HL level possibly had more adequate and appropriate information and health knowledge [44,45,46,47], which assisted them to make better health decisions and adopt preventive methods to protect themselves from the disease during the pandemic [48]. Also, HL was indicated to be positively associated with better attitudes and preparedness for the outbreak during the early onset of COVID-19 [15]. In addition, people with higher health literacy had better health-related behaviors that may be a benefit to their health [29].
Importantly, we found that health literacy and preventive behaviors (mask wearing, hand washing, and physical distancing) have modification effects on reducing the risk of having S-COVID-19-S in patients with PEHC. The finding is similar with a previous study that higher health literacy was found to be associated with better adherence to infection prevention and control behaviors, and lower risk of having S-COVID-19-S in health care workers [30]. Health literacy was previously suggested as the driving factor between socioeconomic status and health outcomes [49] and between education level and health status [44]. Noticeably, mask wearing was found to be the most effective modifier to lower the risk of having S-COVID-19-S in patients with underlying medical condition (up to 77% reduction). Even though hand washing and physical distancing were shown to insignificantly modify the risk of having S-COVID-19-S in highly vulnerable people after being adjusted for socio-demographic factors, these preventive behaviors were still shown to have a potentially protective effect to protect people with PEHC from having suspected COVID-19 symptoms.
Our study is the first study to investigate modification effects of preventive factors (such as health literacy, preventive behaviors) on the risk of having S-COVID-19-S in patients with PEHC. However, in our cross-sectional study, it is not possible to explore the causal relationship between underlying medical condition, health literacy, and preventive behaviors and the risk of having S-COVID-19-S in the study. Besides, suspected COVID-19 symptoms and underlying medical condition of participants were self-reported. Although self-reporting is a common approach for collecting data in epidemiological and medical studies, this method may lead to recall bias due to recall error of the past events of participants [50]. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution. Fortunately, a large sample size allows us to examine the associations and interactions that help to raise the phenomenon for the future research. Another limitation was that we cannot identify patients with symptoms of COVID-19 or symptoms like COVID-19 by asking them. Fortunately, there were no new confirmed cases in the studied hospitals and health centers during the data collection period [51].
Despite of remaining limitations, our study helps to explore the modifying effects of preventive factors (health literacy and preventive behaviors) mitigating the negative association between having an underlying medical condition and the risk of having S-COVID-19-S. In the limited scope of one study, we assessed the modifying effect of each preventive behavior separately, but not the combined effects of these behaviors. This approach, however, helps us to figure out the differences of the protective effect of each behavior in people with pre-existing health conditions, and helps to find out the most significantly effective modifier. In further studies, exploring the factors associated with the adherence to preventive behaviors, and the combined effects of preventive behaviors on having suspected COVID-19 symptoms is essential to help researchers and practitioners to have oversight of people’s awareness and knowledge during the viral pandemic.

5. Conclusions

People with pre-existing health conditions had a higher likelihood of having S-COVID-19-S. Fortunately, higher health literacy and better adherence to mask wearing were associated with lower likelihood of having suspected COVID-19 symptoms, especially in those with pre-existing health conditions. Strategic public health approaches are needed to promote health literacy and infection preventive behaviors (e.g., mask wearing, hand washing, and social distancing) that may help to contain the pandemic.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8598/s1, Table S1. Association between socio-demographic characteristics and having S-Covid-19-S in studied participants via logistic regression (N = 8291). Table S2. Spearman correlation among covariates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.T.N., N.T.L., M.H.N., L.V.P., B.N.D., H.C.N. (Hoang C. Nguyen), H.C.N. (Huu C. Nguyen), T.H.H., H.K.D., P.B.N., M.V.T., T.V.D. (Thinh V. Do), H.Q.N., T.T.P.N., N.P.T.N., C.Q.T., K.V.T., T.T.D., T.T.M.P. and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Data curation, T.T.N., L.V.P., B.N.D., H.C.N. (Hoang C. Nguyen), H.C.N. (Huu C. Nguyen), T.H.H., H.K.D., P.B.N., M.V.T., T.V.D. (Thinh V. Do), H.Q.N., N.P.T.N., C.Q.T., K.V.T., T.T.D.; Formal analysis, N.T.L. and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Funding acquisition, T.T.N., L.V.P., B.N.D., H.C.N. (Hoang C. Nguyen) and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Investigation, T.T.N., N.T.L., M.H.N., L.V.P., B.N.D., H.C.N. (Hoang C. Nguyen), H.C.N. (Huu C. Nguyen), T.H.H., H.K.D., P.B.N., M.V.T., T.V.D. (Thinh V. Do), H.Q.N., T.T.P.N., N.P.T.N., C.Q.T., K.V.T., T.T.D., T.T.M.P. and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Methodology, T.T.N., N.T.L., M.H.N., L.V.P., B.N.D., H.C.N. (Hoang C. Nguyen), H.C.N. (Huu C. Nguyen), T.H.H., H.K.D., P.B.N., M.V.T., T.V.D. (Thinh V. Do), H.Q.N., T.T.P.N., N.P.T.N., C.Q.T., K.V.T., T.T.D., T.T.M.P. and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Project administration, M.H.N., T.T.P.N., T.T.M.P.; Resources, T.T.N., L.V.P., H.C.N. (Hoang C. Nguyen) and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Software, N.T.L. and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Supervision, L.V.P. and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Validation, T.T.N., N.T.L., M.H.N., L.V.P., B.N.D., H.C.N. (Hoang C. Nguyen), H.C.N. (Huu C. Nguyen), T.H.H., H.K.D., P.B.N., M.V.T., T.V.D. (Thinh V. Do), H.Q.N., T.T.P.N., N.P.T.N., C.Q.T., K.V.T., T.T.D., T.T.M.P. and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Writing—original draft, T.T.N., N.T.L. and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong); Writing—review & editing, T.T.N., N.T.L., M.H.N., L.V.P., B.N.D., H.C.N. (Hoang C. Nguyen), H.C.N. (Huu C. Nguyen), T.H.H., H.K.D., P.B.N., M.V.T., T.V.D. (Thinh V. Do), H.Q.N., T.T.P.N., N.P.T.N., C.Q.T., K.V.T., T.T.D., T.T.M.P. and T.V.D. (Tuyen Van Duong). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy Hospital, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Nguyen National Hospital, Military Hospital 103, and Taipei Medical University (108-6202-008-112; 108-3805-022-400).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all experts, researchers, research assistants, medical staffs, and students who assisted and supported our study. We also would like to thank OPD visitors participated in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pak, A.; Adegboye, O.A.; Adekunle, A.I.; Rahman, K.M.; McBryde, E.S.; Eisen, D.P. Economic Consequences of the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Need for Epidemic Preparedness. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 241. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ataguba, J.E. COVID-19 Pandemic, a War to be Won: Understanding its Economic Implications for Africa. Appl. Health Econ. Health Policy 2020, 18, 325–328. [Google Scholar]
  3. Miller, I.F.; Becker, A.D.; Grenfell, B.T.; Metcalf, C.J.E. Disease and healthcare burden of COVID-19 in the United States. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar]
  4. Banerjee, A.; Pasea, L.; Harris, S.; Gonzalez-Izquierdo, A.; Torralbo, A.; Shallcross, L.; Noursadeghi, M.; Pillay, D.; Sebire, N.; Holmes, C.; et al. Estimating excess 1-year mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic according to underlying conditions and age: A population-based cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1715–1725. [Google Scholar]
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). People with Certain Medical Conditions. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html (accessed on 26 October 2020).
  6. Wang, B.; Li, R.; Lu, Z.; Huang, Y. Does comorbidity increase the risk of patients with COVID-19: Evidence from meta-analysis. Aging 2020, 12, 6049–6057. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mahumud, R.A.; Kamara, J.K.; Renzaho, A.M.N. The epidemiological burden of and overall distribution of chronic comorbidities in coronavirus disease-2019 among 202,005 infected patients: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection 2020, 48, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, D.; Hu, B.; Hu, C.; Zhu, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Xiang, H.; Cheng, Z.; Xiong, Y.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020, 323, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sanyaolu, A.; Okorie, C.; Marinkovic, A.; Patidar, R.; Younis, K.; Desai, P.; Hosein, Z.; Padda, I.; Mangat, J.; Altaf, M. Comorbidity and its Impact on Patients with COVID-19. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2020, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Grasselli, G.; Greco, M.; Zanella, A.; Albano, G.; Antonelli, M.; Bellani, G.; Bonanomi, E.; Cabrini, L.; Carlesso, E.; Castelli, G.; et al. Risk Factors Associated With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Int. Med. 2020, 180, 1345. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mikami, T.; Miyashita, H.; Yamada, T.; Harrington, M.; Steinberg, D.; Dunn, A.; Siau, E. Risk Factors for Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 in New York City. J. Gen. Int. Med. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. World Health Organization. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Implications for Infection Prevention Precautions. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/transmission-of-sars-cov-2-implications-for-infection-prevention-precautions (accessed on 9 July 2020).
  13. Dhand, R.; Li, J. Coughs and Sneezes: Their Role in Transmission of Respiratory Viral Infections, Including SARS-CoV-2. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 202, 651–659. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sørensen, K.; Van den Broucke, S.; Fullam, J.; Doyle, G.; Pelikan, J.; Slonska, Z.; Brand, H. Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 80. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wolf, M.S.; Serper, M.; Opsasnick, L.; O’Conor, R.M.; Curtis, L.; Benavente, J.Y.; Wismer, G.; Batio, S.; Eifler, M.; Zheng, P.; et al. Awareness, Attitudes, and Actions Related to COVID-19 Among Adults With Chronic Conditions at the Onset of the U.S. Outbreak. Ann. Int. Med. 2020, 173, 100–109. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gaglio, B. Health Literacy—An Important Element in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. J. Health Commun. 2016, 21, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hahn, E.A.; Burns, J.L.; Jacobs, E.A.; Ganschow, P.S.; Garcia, S.F.; Rutsohn, J.P.; Baker, D.W. Health Literacy and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study of Underserved English- and Spanish-Speaking Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. J. Health Commun. 2015, 20, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McCabe, R.; Healey, P.G.T. Miscommunication in Doctor-Patient Communication. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2018, 10, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wang, M.-J.; Hung, L.-C.; Lo, Y.-T. Glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: Role of health literacy and shared decision-making. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2019, 13, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). How to Protect Yourself & Others. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html (accessed on 26 October 2020).
  21. Cheng, V.C.-C.; Wong, S.-C.; Chuang, V.W.-M.; So, S.Y.-C.; Chen, J.H.-K.; Sridhar, S.; To, K.K.-W.; Chan, J.F.-W.; Hung, I.F.-N.; Ho, P.-L.; et al. The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2. J. Infect. 2020, 81, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leung, N.H.; Chu, D.K.; Shiu, E.Y.; Chan, K.-H.; McDevitt, J.J.; Hau, B.J.; Yen, H.-L.; Li, Y.; Ip, D.K.; Peiris, J.M.; et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 676–680. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, X.; Ran, L.; Liu, Q.; Hu, Q.; Du, X.; Tan, X. Hand Hygiene, Mask-Wearing Behaviors and Its Associated Factors during the COVID-19 Epidemic: A Cross-Sectional Study among Primary School Students in Wuhan, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2893. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chu, D.K.; Akl, E.A.; Duda, S.; Solo, K.; Yaacoub, S.; Schünemann, H.J.; Chu, D.K.; Akl, E.A.; El-harakeh, A.; Bognanni, A.; et al. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2020, 395, 1973–1987. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fung, I.C.-H.; Cairncross, S. Effectiveness of handwashing in preventing SARS: A review. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2006, 11, 1749–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pham, K.M.; Pham, L.V.; Phan, D.T.; Tran, T.V.; Nguyen, H.C.; Nguyen, M.H.; Nguyen, H.C.; Ha, T.H.; Dao, H.K.; Nguyen, P.B.; et al. Healthy Dietary Intake Behavior Potentially Modifies the Negative Effect of COVID-19 Lockdown on Depression: A Hospital and Health Center Survey. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Van Duong, T.; Aringazina, A.; Baisunova, G.; Nurjanah, N.; Pham, T.V.; Pham, K.M.; Truong, T.Q.; Nguyen, K.T.; Oo, W.M.; Su, T.T.; et al. Development and validation of a new short-form health literacy instrument (HLS-SF12) for the general public in six Asian countries. Health Lit. Res. Pract. 2019, 3, e91–e102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Van Duong, T.; Nguyen, T.T.P.; Pham, K.M.; Nguyen, K.T.; Giap, M.H.; Tran, T.D.X.; Nguyen, C.X.; Yang, S.-H.; Su, C.-T. Validation of the short-form health literacy questionnaire (HLS-SF12) and its determinants among people living in rural areas in Vietnam. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Do, B.N.; Nguyen, P.-A.; Pham, K.M.; Nguyen, H.C.; Nguyen, M.H.; Tran, C.Q.; Nguyen, T.T.P.; Tran, T.V.; Pham, L.V.; Tran, K.V.; et al. Determinants of Health Literacy and Its Associations With Health-Related Behaviors, Depression Among the Older People With and Without Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms: A Multi-Institutional Study. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 581746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Do, B.N.; Tran, T.V.; Phan, D.T.; Nguyen, H.C.; Nguyen, T.T.P.; Nguyen, H.C.; Ha, T.H.; Dao, H.K.; Trinh, M.V.; Do, T.V.; et al. Health Literacy, eHealth Literacy, Adherence to Infection Prevention and Control Procedures, Lifestyle Changes, and Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms Among Health Care Workers During Lockdown: Online Survey. J. Med. Int. Res. 2020, 22, e22894. [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Duong, T.; Pham, K.M.; Do, B.N.; Kim, G.B.; Dam, H.T.; Le, V.-T.T.; Nguyen, T.T.P.; Nguyen, H.T.; Nguyen, T.T.; Le, T.T.; et al. Digital Healthy Diet Literacy and Self-Perceived Eating Behavior Change during COVID-19 Pandemic among Undergraduate Nursing and Medical Students: A Rapid Online Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ho, H.V.; Hoang, G.T.; Pham, V.T.; Duong, T.V.; Pham, K.M. Factors Associated with Health Literacy among the Elderly People in Vietnam. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Nguyen, H.C.; Nguyen, M.H.; Do, B.N.; Tran, C.Q.; Nguyen, T.T.P.; Minh, K.P.; Pham, L.V.; Tran, K.V.; Duong, T.T.; Tran, T.V.; et al. People with suspected COVID-19 symptoms were more likely depressed and had lower health-related quality of life: The potential benefit of health literacy. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Nguyen, H.T.; Do, B.N.; Pham, K.M.; Giang, K.B.; Dam, H.T.B.; Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, T.T.P.; Nguyen, Y.H.; Sørensen, K.; Pleasant, A.; et al. Fear of COVID-19 Scale—Associations of Its Scores with Health Literacy and Health-Related Behaviors among Medical Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. HLS-EU Consortium. Comparative Report of Health Literacy in Eight EU Member States. The European Health Literacy Project 2009–2012. Available online: https://www.healthliteracyeurope.net/hls-eu (accessed on 22 October 2012).
  36. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Advice for the Public. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public (accessed on 1 October 2020).
  37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Social Distancing. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/social-distancing.html (accessed on 24 October 2020).
  38. Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; MacKenzie, C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Editorial Team. Overview of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Available online: https://bestpractice.bmj.com/topics/en-gb/3000165 (accessed on 10 February 2020).
  40. Ma, Q.-X.; Shan, H.; Zhang, H.-L.; Li, G.-M.; Yang, R.; Chen, J.-M. Potential utilities of mask-wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS-CoV-2. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 1567–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jefferson, T.; Del Mar, C.B.; Dooley, L.; Ferroni, E.; Al-Ansary, L.A.; Bawazeer, G.A.; Van Driel, M.L.; Nair, N.S.; Jones, M.A.; Thorning, S.; et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, 2011, CD006207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Tracht, S.M.; Del Valle, S.Y.; Hyman, J.M. Mathematical Modeling of the Effectiveness of Facemasks in Reducing the Spread of Novel Influenza A (H1N1). PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gaygısız, Ü.; Gaygısız, E.; Özkan, T.; Lajunen, T. Individual differences in behavioral reactions to H1N1 during a later stage of the epidemic. J. Infect. Public Health 2012, 5, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Van Der Heide, I.; Wang, J.; Droomers, M.; Spreeuwenberg, P.; Rademakers, J.; Uiters, E. The Relationship Between Health, Education, and Health Literacy: Results From the Dutch Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey. J. Health Commun. 2013, 18 (Suppl. 1), 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Van Duong, T.; Sørensen, K.; Pelikan, J.; Van den Broucke, S.; Lin, I.-F.; Lin, Y.-C.; Huang, H.-L.; Chang, P.W. Health-related behaviors moderate the association between age and self-reported health literacy among Taiwanese women. Women Health 2017, 58, 632–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sørensen, K.; Pelikan, J.M.; Röthlin, F.; Ganahl, K.; Slonska, Z.; Doyle, G.; Fullam, J.; Kondilis, B.; Agrafiotis, D.; Uiters, E.; et al. Health literacy in Europe: Comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur. J. Public Health 2015, 25, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Jayasinghe, U.W.; Harris, M.F.; Parker, S.M.; Litt, J.; van Driel, M.; Mazza, D.; Del Mar, C.; Lloyd, J.; Smith, J.; Zwar, N.; et al. Preventive Evidence into Practice Partnership, G., The impact of health literacy and life style risk factors on health-related quality of life of Australian patients. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2016, 14, 68. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rademakers, J.; Heijmans, M. Beyond Reading and Understanding: Health Literacy as the Capacity to Act. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Stormacq, C.; Van den Broucke, S.; Wosinski, J. Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review. Health Promot. Int. 2018, 34, e1–e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Althubaiti, A. Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2016, 9, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ministry of Health. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak in Vietnam. Available online: https://ncov.moh.gov.vn/ (accessed on 4 May 2020).
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of studied participants (N = 8291).
Table 1. Characteristics of studied participants (N = 8291).
VariablesTotal
(N = 8291)		Without S-COVID-19-S †
(N = 5162)		With S-COVID-19-S †
(N = 3129)		p *
N (%)N (%)N (%)
Age, year <0.001
18–393955 (47.7)2830 (54.8)1125 (36)
40–592473 (29.8)1487 (28.8)986 (31.5)
60–851863 (22.5)845 (16.4)1018 (32.5)
Gender 0.837
Women4890 (59)3049 (59.1)1841 (58.8)
Men3401 (41)2113 (40.9)1288 (41.2)
Marital status <0.001
Never married1635 (19.8)1223 (23.8)412 (13.2)
Ever married6628 (80.2)3924 (76.2)2704 (86.8)
Education attainment 0.017
Junior high school or below2223 (26.9)1361 (26.4)862 (27.6)
Senior high school2277 (27.5)1474 (28.6)803 (25.7)
College/university or higher3776 (45.6)2319 (45)1457 (46.7)
Occupation 0.006
Employed2390 (28.9)1455 (28.2)935 (29.9)
Own business3044 (36.8)1863 (36.1)1181 (37.8)
Others2843 (34.3)1837 (35.6)1006 (32.2)
Ability to pay for medication <0.001
Very or fairly difficult4475 (54)2460 (47.7)2015 (64.5)
Very or fairly easy3805 (46)2698 (52.3)1107 (35.5)
Social status <0.001
Low1403 (16.9)811 (15.7)592 (19)
Middle or high6879 (83.1)4349 (84.3)2530 (81)
BMI, kg/m2 0.063
Underweight (BMI < 18.5)783 (9.5)494 (9.6)289 (9.3)
Normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25.0)6518 (78.8)4020 (78)2498 (80)
Overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25.0)974 (11.8)638 (12.4)336 (10.8)
Pre-existing health conditions <0.001
Non-PEHC6415 (77.4)4494 (87.1)1921 (61.4)
PEHC1876 (22.6)668 (12.9)1208 (38.6)
Preventive behaviors
Mask wearing <0.001
Not adhering2427 (55.8)1174 (45.2)1253 (71.5)
Adhering1921 (44.2)1421 (54.8)500 (28.5)
Hand washing <0.001
Not adhering3291 (75.7)1779 (68.6)1512 (86.3)
Adhering1057 (24.3)816 (31.4)241 (13.7)
Physical distancing <0.001
Not adhering3453 (79.4)1893 (72.9)1560 (89)
Adhering895 (20.6)702 (27.1)193 (11.0)
HL index, mean ± SD28.1 ± 9.430.1 ± 9.224.9 ± 8.9<0.001
Abbreviations: S-COVID-19-S, suspected coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms; BMI, body mass index; PEHC, pre-existing health condition; HL, health literacy. * Results of Chi-square test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, appropriately. † Suspected COVID-19 symptoms included fever, cough, dyspnea, myalgia, fatigue, sputum production, confusion, headache, sore throat, rhinorrhea, chest pain, hemoptysis, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting.
Table
Table 2. Associations of pre-existing health conditions, preventive behaviors, and health literacy with having S-COVID-19-S (N = 8291).
Table 2. Associations of pre-existing health conditions, preventive behaviors, and health literacy with having S-COVID-19-S (N = 8291).
VariablesS-COVID-19-S *
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)pAdjusted OR (95% CI) †p
Pre-existing health condition
Non-PEHC1.00 1.00
PEHC4.23 (3.80, 4.72)<0.0013.38 (3.01, 3.79)<0.001
Preventive behaviors
Mask wearing
Not adhering1.00 1.00
Adhering0.33 (0.29, 0.38)<0.0010.36 (0.31, 0.41)<0.001
Hand washing
Not adhering1.00 1.00
Adhering0.35 (0.30, 0.41)<0.0010.38 (0.32, 0.45)<0.001
Physical distancing
Not adhering1.00 1.00
Adhering0.33 (0.28, 0.40)<0.0010.35 (0.29, 0.42)<0.001
HL index, 1-score increment0.94 (0.93, 0.94)<0.0010.95 (0.94, 0.96)<0.001
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; S-COVID-19-S, suspected coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms; PEHC, pre-existing health condition; HL, health literacy. * Suspected COVID-19 symptoms including fever, cough, dyspnea, myalgia, fatigue, sputum production, confusion, headache, sore throat, rhinorrhea, chest pain, hemoptysis, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting. † Adjusted for age, occupation, ability to pay for medication, social status, and body mass index.
Table
Table 3. Interactions of health literacy and preventive behaviors with pre-existing health conditions on suspected COVID-19 symptoms (N = 8291).
Table 3. Interactions of health literacy and preventive behaviors with pre-existing health conditions on suspected COVID-19 symptoms (N = 8291).
InteractionS-COVID-19-S †
Model 1Model 2
OR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)p
PEHC and HL
Non-PEHC × Lowest HL1.00 1.00
PEHC × Lowest HL14.16 (9.85, 20.35)<0.00116.53 (11.41, 23.96)<0.001
Non-PEHC × HL with 1-score increment0.97 (0.96, 0.97)<0.0010.98 (0.97, 0.98)<0.001
PEHC × HL with 1-score increment0.94 (0.93, 0.96)<0.0010.93 (0.92, 0.94)<0.001
PEHC and mask wearing
Non-PEHC × Not adhering1.00 1.00
PEHC × Not adhering19.57 (15.54, 24.64)<0.00117.24 (13.58, 21.88)<0.001
Non-PEHC × Adhering0.67 (0.57, 0.79)<0.0010.65 (0.55, 0.77)<0.001
PEHC × Adhering0.20 (0.14, 0.29)<0.0010.23 (0.16, 0.32)<0.001
PEHC and hand washing
Non-PEHC × Not adhering1.00 1.00
PEHC × Not adhering11.67 (9.76, 13.97)<0.00110.31 (8.53, 12.46)<0.001
Non-PEHC × Adhering0.51 (0.42, 0.63)<0.0010.50 (0.40, 0.61)<0.001
PEHC × Adhering0.64 (0.43, 0.97)0.0350.78 (0.51, 1.19)0.250
PEHC and physical distancing
Non-PEHC × Not adhering1.00 1.00
PEHC × Not adhering11.99 (10.03, 14.34)<0.00110.54 (8.73, 12.73)<0.001
Non-PEHC × Adhering0.43 (0.34, 0.54)<0.0010.41 (0.32, 0.51)<0.001
PEHC × Adhering0.67 (0.44, 1.02)0.0630.82 (0.53, 1.27)0.376
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; S-COVID-19-S, suspected coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms; PEHC, pre-existing health conditions; HL, health literacy. Model 1: Interaction between PEHC and health literacy, preventive behaviors. Model 2: Adjusted for age, occupation, ability to pay for medication, social status, and body mass index. † Suspected COVID-19 symptoms including fever, cough, dyspnea, myalgia, fatigue, sputum production, confusion, headache, sore throat, rhinorrhea, chest pain, hemoptysis, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, T.T.; Le, N.T.; Nguyen, M.H.; Pham, L.V.; Do, B.N.; Nguyen, H.C.; Nguyen, H.C.; Ha, T.H.; Dao, H.K.; Nguyen, P.B.; et al. Health Literacy and Preventive Behaviors Modify the Association between Pre-Existing Health Conditions and Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms: A Multi-Institutional Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228598

AMA Style

Nguyen TT, Le NT, Nguyen MH, Pham LV, Do BN, Nguyen HC, Nguyen HC, Ha TH, Dao HK, Nguyen PB, et al. Health Literacy and Preventive Behaviors Modify the Association between Pre-Existing Health Conditions and Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms: A Multi-Institutional Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(22):8598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228598

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Tan T., Nga T. Le, Minh H. Nguyen, Linh V. Pham, Binh N. Do, Hoang C. Nguyen, Huu C. Nguyen, Tung H. Ha, Hung K. Dao, Phuoc B. Nguyen, and et al. 2020. "Health Literacy and Preventive Behaviors Modify the Association between Pre-Existing Health Conditions and Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms: A Multi-Institutional Survey" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 22: 8598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228598

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop