Next Article in Journal
Natural Sweeteners: The Relevance of Food Naturalness for Consumers, Food Security Aspects, Sustainability and Health Impacts
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Home Working Population during COVID-19 Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 17
10.3390/ijerph17176278
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Characteristic of Virulence, Biofilm and Antibiotic Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae

by
Guoying Wang
†,
Guo Zhao
†,
Xiaoyu Chao
,
Longxiang Xie
* and
Hongju Wang
*
Institute of Biomedical Informatics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(17), 6278; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176278
Submission received: 24 July 2020 / Revised: 18 August 2020 / Accepted: 26 August 2020 / Published: 28 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Disease Epidemiology)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important gram-negative opportunistic pathogen that causes a variety of infectious diseases, including urinary tract infections, bacteremia, pneumonia, and liver abscesses. With the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKP) strains, the rapid spread of these clinical strains in geography is particularly worrying. However, the detailed mechanisms of virulence and antibiotic resistance in K. pneumoniae are still not very clear. Therefore, studying and elucidating the pathogenic mechanisms and drug resistance mechanism of K. pneumoniae infection are important parts of current medical research. In this paper, we systematically summarized the virulence, biofilm, and antibiotic tolerance mechanisms of K. pneumoniae, and explored the application of whole genome sequencing and global proteomics, which will provide new clues for clinical treatment of K. pneumoniae.

1. Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a class of gram-negative bacterium that is ubiquitously found on the surface of mucosa in animals, or in the environment (such as water, soil, etc.). In humans, K. pneumoniae is concentrated in the gastrointestinal tract, and a few in the nasopharynx, through which the bacteria can enter the blood circulation or other tissues, and then cause infection. In the era of pre-antibiotics, K. pneumoniae was a vital pathogen of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), especially in diabetics and alcoholics. In the era of antibiotics that followed, it became a major cause of medical-related infections in hospitals [1], and a risk factor of severe community-acquired infections [2]. In Singapore, mortality rates of K. pneumoniae bacteremia ranged from 20–26% [3]. In China, K. pneumoniae accounted for 11.9% of isolated pathogens from ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia [4]. In addition, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) caused by K. pneumoniae have been reported to account for 73.9% of 664 clinical samples in a multi-center clinical study that covered 25 “AAA” hospitals in 14 provinces of China [5]. There is no doubt that such a high prevalence and mortality rate of K. pneumoniae infection caused a great burden on the country’s health system.
K. pneumoniae has many accessory genomes of plasmids and chromosome gene loci. According to the accessory genome, K. pneumoniae strains are divided into three types: opportunistic, hypervirulent, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) [6]. Recently, most infections of K. pneumoniae were caused by the classic K. pneumoniae (cKp) strains which remained living in the hospitals, and then caused infection in weak patients. The cKp strain appears to be different from the hvKp. Genetic factors of high virulence phenotype of hvKp are present on a large virulent plasmid, and there may be integrative conjugal elements. hvKp infection often occurs in multiple sites and subsequently spreads, which makes it more difficult to treat and control. The variant strain hvKp, firstly discovered in the Pacific Circle, can lead to community-acquired, aggressive, and metastatic infections in diabetes or normal immune function with liver abscesses, endophthalmitis, meningitis, and septic arthritis in young people in [7,8,9]. Meanwhile, the emergence and spread of MDR strains is an urgent problem to be solved in the field of K. pneumoniae. The characteristic of MDR K. pneumoniae is closely related to the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) encoded by plasmid. Benefitting from plasmids and transferable genetic elements, K. pneumoniae continues to accumulate ARGs in the context of improper antibiotic use, resulting in the emergence of an extremely drug-resistant (XDR) strain with “super resistome” [10]. Therefore, further exploration of mechanisms of virulence and drug resistance in K. pneumoniae are urgently needed.

2. Virulence

In order to accomplish infection, K. pneumoniae must conquer mechanical and chemical barriers first, and evade recognition by the humoral immunity and cellular immunity of the host. Upon entry into the host, the invasive microorganisms are recognized by the immune cells via pattern recognition receptors (PRR), and stimulate the body to produce various immune mediators [11]. The mononuclear phagocyte system plays a critical role in the innate immune response, which has the function of phagocytosis and coordinates the immune response through the affection of cytokines and chemokines. Neutrophils are the effector cells firstly presenting to the infection sites. IL-8 and IL-23 are important mediators involved in this process, which induce IL-17 production to promote granulocytopoiesis [12,13]. IL-12 can also increase the level of IL-17 via the increase of gamma interferon. Besides this, other factors involved in the immune response are the production of IL-1β and other pro-inflammatory factors, including IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [14].
Currently, there are four virulent factors identified: pili, capsule, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and iron carriers [15]. K. pneumoniae is assembled by adhesins, type 1 and type 3 pili, and it promotes bacterial adhesion to epithelial, immune cells, and abiotic surfaces (Figure 1). RmpA is a plasmid-located virulence factor of K. pneumoniae, regulating the synthesis of capsular polysaccharides. RmpA-carrying strains were significantly associated with high-mucus phenotype of hvKP, and with purulent tissue infection such as liver abscess [16]. Although the capsule plays a vital role in protecting K. pneumoniae from immune responses of the host, its virulence may be caused by other factors. In fact, LPS in the major K. pneumoniae strains may be modified in part, and this leads to K. pneumoniae not being recognized by the host cell, while other strains may use the capsule to camouflage LPS to avoid the detection of being toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) [17,18]. The inflammatory response is inhibited, and the clearance to bacteria is reduced by these modifications. At the same time, the ability to obtain iron is critical to the growth and replication of bacteria. There are four iron-absorbing molecules (iron carriers) in K. pneumoniae: enterobactin, yersiniabactin, salmochelin, and aerobactin, respectively. Existing in both typical and highly virulent strains, enteromycin has the highest affinity for iron, and it is considered to be the main iron absorption system. Unlike enteromycin, gastrin and yersinide are more prevalent in hvKp than in cKp [12,13]. Salmochelin is associated with invasive diseases, and is common in highly virulent K. pneumoniae strains that cause severe community-related infections, such as liver abscess and pneumonia [19]. A recent study indicated that hvKp strains are capable of producing larger and more activated iron-absorbing molecules, compared with non-virulent strains, which may lead to their virulence and pathogenicity [20].
In addition, some special virulence factors of K. pneumoniae strains have been considered in recent years. Pks gene clusters can be detected in bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by pks positive (pks+) strains. Colibactin is a toxic substance encoded by pks gene clusters, which participates in the process of host DNA damage and strains virulence enhancement [21]. By monitoring the prevalence of K. pneumoniae-infected bacterial meningitis, Xu et al. found that the high prevalence and mortality of hvKP producing kpc-2 gene meningitis should be paid attention [22]. Some “high risk” sequence types of K. pneumoniae, such as STs11, 15, and 383 clones, showed a combination of drug resistance and virulence factor. In these strains, many elements are carried on a large virulent plasmid (such as ST147 with blaNDM-1), which usually encodes iron vector genes (such as aerobactin, salmochelin, and enterochelin), heavy metal resistance genes (encoding resistance for tellurite, silver, copper, and lead), and capsule up-regulation genes, rmpA and rmpA2. The emergence of this combination of resistance and virulence is worrying [23]. It is necessary to conduct in-depth study and epidemic monitoring of some highly virulent strains. Although the clinical features of infection by hvKp strains have been fully elucidated, there are only a few reliable biological indicators to distinguish these strains from other K. pneumoniae strains. Aerobactin plays an important role in iron carrying, growth, and virulence of K. pneumoniae, so it is considered to be the key virulence factor of hvKP. The high expression level of aerobactin in strain is a significant feature of the hvKP strain. Li et al. revealed that string test combined with aerobactin and rmpA index is helpful to improve the detection rate of hvKP [16]. We systematically summarized the virulence, biofilm and antibotic resistance related genes, and their functions of K. pneumoniae are systematically summarize in Table 1.

3. Biofilm

K. pneumoniae can form biofilm, and it accumulates in such cells embedded in the self-generated matrix of the extracellular polymeric substance (Figure 1). Extracellular polymeric substances are complex structures containing polysaccharides, proteins, and DNA. Most clinically apparent K. pneumoniae biofilm is formed on the catheter and the inner surface of internal devices [57]. K. pneumoniae biofilm can lead to colonization in the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary tracts, as well as the development of invasive infections (especially in immune-deficient patients). The development of K. pneumoniae biofilm on the surface of hard objects undergoes the adhesion of cells, the formation of small colonies, maturation, and the propagation as ultimately free-living cells.
The most important surface structures of K. pneumoniae involved in the formation process are type 3 pili and capsular polysaccharides (CPs) [58]. Pili mediate steady adhesion, while CPs ultimately affect biofilm structure and intercellular communication. Given the dynamics of biofilm formation and the variability of environmental stimuli, embedded bacterium must have the ability to rapidly and extensively change gene expression. Transcriptional regulation is regulated by quorum sensing, a system coordinating the signals and responses that control gene expression in a microbial population. The putative quorum-sensing-related regulators and autoinducers in K. pneumoniae have been identified, but the relevant available data is still incomplete [58]. K. pneumoniae with biofilm is protected from the host immune response, in part. This matrix inhibits the proximity of antibodies and antimicrobial peptides, and reduces the effects of complement and phagocytosis [59]. Mutations in some specific genes of K. pneumoniae can also affect the function of biofilm. Mostafavi et al. found that fabZ and lpxC mutations lead to lpxC inhibitor-dependent growth of K. pneumoniae, which leads to the loss of biofilm homeostasis [24]. In recent years, the research on the outer membrane protein of K. pneumoniae has attracted the attention of researchers. Hsieh et al. reported that YfgL (BamB) lipoprotein is involved in the biofilm formation of K. pneumoniae and the transcriptional expression of type 1 pili, which is critical for the anti-phagocytosis of K. pneumoniae in vivo [25]. Besides this, K. pneumoniae’s outer membrane protein A (KpOmpA) is reported to be involved in cell adhesion and cell–cell recognition, as well as immune response of host. Meanwhile, the L3 site on the KpOmpA surface may be related to pathogenicity of K. pneumoniae [26]. Oxidative stress may oxidize and destroy the biofilm of K. pneumoniae, resulting in the loss of major membrane proteins and activity of K. pneumoniae [60]. The above related studies have revealed that K. pneumoniae’s biofilm is one of the crucial conditions for maintaining its activity.

4. Antibiotic Resistance

4.1. Aminoglycoside Resistance Gene

Aminoglycosides, which can inhibit bacteria protein synthesis, were used in antibacterial chemotherapy extensively from 1940 to 1980, until they were replaced by following carbapenems, cephalosporins, and fluoroquinolone drugs [61]. During this time, K. pneumoniae acquired antibiotic resistance mechanisms, including drug-modifying enzymes with diverse activities (adenylation, acetylation or phosphorylation). Within ten years, all types of plasmid-mediated resistance genes of aac, aph, and ant gene families in K. pneumoniae were found. The reduced use of aminoglycoside slowed the evolution of the novel resistant genes until the 16SrRNA methylase occurred, which was belonged to the armA gene family, encoding an enzyme that blocks the binding of aminoglycoside antibiotics to the 16SrRNA [27]. These resistant genes are encoded by plasmids in K. pneumoniae, whereas drug-modifying enzymes have narrow-spectrum activity, and 16 rRNA methylase confers resistance to almost all aminoglycosides, including plazomicin and recently developed aminoglycosides [62]. However, an epidemic surveillance, conducted by Cirit et al. in Turkey and Syria in 2019, found that the aminoglycoside resistance of clinically isolated K. pneumoniae was mainly mediated by aac (3)-II, rather than 16SrRNA methylase [63]. The chromosomal location of armA gene family in K. pneumoniae has merely been reported once before [64]. Other known plasmids that mediate the activity of 16S rRNA methylases, including the NpmA and Rmt gene family, have also been identified in K. pneumoniae [61], but there is still no evidence of chromosomal localization.
The mechanism of K. pneumoniae’s chromosomal tolerance to aminoglycosides includes modification of cell permeability (because of changes in the KpnEF efflux pump systems and AcrAB-TolC, assuming loss of porins KpnO) and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) genes. Deletion of AcrAB-TolC increased the sensitivity of tobramycin and gentamicin [28], whereas the kpnEF mutant showed significant resistance to tobramycin and spectinomycin [29], but only slightly tolerated gentamicin and streptomycin. It indicated that the osmotic device has a different affinity for different aminoglycosides. Studies have reported that in vitro KpnO pore proteins are directly involved in aminoglycoside resistance, and they can lead to the tolerance of tobramycin, streptomycin, and spectinomycin [30]. No mutations conferring resistance by target modification, such as rpsL or rrs, have been identified in the K. pneumoniae clinical strains. The causes may be high fitness costs and reduced virulence associated with rpsL mutations, so they are relatively rare [31]. Among gentamicin- or amikacin-resistant K. pneumoniae strains, acc (6′)-Ib was considered to be the most widespread, followed by acc (3′)-II, aph (3′)-IV, and ant (3′)-I [65]. In addition, aminoglycoside resistance was also found in strains producing β-lactamases, which was realized by multiple drug resistance coding genes in plasmids, and K. pneumoniae strains coexisting with rmtC and blaNDM-1 gene were isolated from Turkish clinical samples [66]. Hence, we should not only pay attention to the emergence of aminoglycoside resistance genes, but also pay attention to multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae.

4.2. Quinolone Resistance Gene

Quinolone antibiotics target bacteria topoisomerases in order to inhibit DNA replication. These antibiotics have been applied clinically since the 1960s, but they are more widely used after the use of the first class of fluoroquinolones in the 1980s, which leads to the evolution of bacterial fluoroquinolone resistance [67]. The mechanism of K. pneumoniae resistance to fluoroquinolone mainly includes mutation of target gene, MDR efflux pump production, and modification of enzymes and target protection proteins [68].
K. pneumoniae treated with the first-generation quinolone drug nalidixic acid and the first-generation fluoroquinolone drug ofloxacin was also accompanied by chromosomal resistance of nalidixic acid and ofloxacin. The primary resistance mechanism is the mutation of DNA gyrase (gyrA-gyrB subunit) binding to the quinolone on the chromosome and topoisomerase IV (parC-parE subunit). Mutations in parC and gyrA in K. pneumoniae were found earlier, and more commonly than those in gyrB and parE [32,69].
Studies have reported that changes in cell permeability in K. pneumoniae are also involved in quinolone resistance, mainly including OmpK36 deficiency [33], overexpression of the multidrug efflux pump gene acrAB [34], and non-alteration of kdeA [35]. Induction of these multidrug efflux pump genes into sensitive E. coli in vitro will increase their drug resistance. Another important efflux pump from OqxAB in K. pneumoniae, which was originally thought to derive from the chromosome, has now been shown to be involved in plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR), and is widespread in other bacteria [36]. The efflux pump regulator was also revealed to be participated in the quinolone resistance of K. pneumoniae [70].
Another class of quinolone resistance genes includes the PMQR determinant, which is present not only in K. pneumoniae, but also in other Enterobacteriaceae species. PMQR determinant is considered to be one of the key factors mediating fluoroquinolone resistance in K. pneumoniae [71,72]. These genes contain the qnr gene, which encodes a protein family that protects DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV from the inhibition of quinolone. The first qnr gene was found on the K. pneumoniae plasmid isolated in USA in 1994. QnrS1, qnrD, qnrB, and oqxAB pump genes could be detected in K. pneumoniae multidrug-resistant strains [73]. Although these proteins are chromosomally encoded in other gram-negative bacteria (including Shewanella algae, Citrobacter spp, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Serratia marcescens) [37], there is still no evidence that the qnr gene is on the chromosome of K. pneumoniae. This suggests that the qnr gene may be one of the genes encoding K. pneumoniae quinolone-resistant plasmids.
Another PMQR gene, aa(6′)-Ib-cr, is considered as the only gene in K. pneumoniae, which is responsible for quinolone modification [37]. It can inactivate narrow-spectrum quinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, which carry the substrate of this enzyme, the unsubstituted piperazine group. Originally it was found to be encoded by the plasmid of K. pneumoniae, but recently was also found on chromosomes as well. Aminoglycoside resistance is usually accompanied by β-lactam and quinolone resistance; aa(6′)-Ib-cr confers aminoglycosides (kanamycin, tobramycin, and amikacin) and quinolones (norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin) resistance [74].

4.3. β-lactam Resistance Gene

β-lactam antibiotics have been used clinically since the 1940s, and are a major class of human medicine-specified antimicrobials. Since then, hundreds of various β-lactamases in intestinal pathogens have evolved, and the number is quite alarming (>2000) and diverse [75].
The penicillin resistance of K. pneumoniae was first found in 1960s, which also led to the discovery of the first class of β-lactamase genes (blaSHV-1 and blaTEM-1). Twenty years later, the first broad-spectrum β-lactamase gene blaSHV-2 was identified in K. pneumoniae obtained from ICU patients in Germany. This gene exhibits a broad spectrum of β-lactam tolerance activities (cephalosporins and monochosamines included) and is defined as the first discovered ESBL gene. Soon, another plasmid-mediated ESBL variant, blaTEM-3, was found in K. pneumoniae in France [38]. Since the emergence of ESBLs in K. pneumoniae during the period 1990–2000s, it has become the main ESBL-borne pathogen in the outbreak of nosocomial infection. Of the clinical strains of K. pneumoniae in all Iraq and Spain hospitals, 40% of the strains are ESBL [76]. During this period, the K. pneumoniae strain, which contains major blaTEM and blaSHV β-lactamases, has a high incidence, and is prevalent in many countries [77]. In 2000, due to the availability of plasmids and transposons encoding blaCTX-M type ESBLs, the types of ESBLs in K. pneumoniae caused by iatrogenic outbreaks was altered [39]. Some studies have found that β-lactam resistance can be activated by ramA, and the excessive production of ramA in K. pneumoniae plays an important role in improving acquired β-lactamase-mediated β-lactam resistance. Proteomic analyses show that this enhancement is mainly achieved by activating efflux pump production [40].
Another type of ESBL gene is transferred to K. pneumoniae through horizontal gene transfer (HGT), blaOXA type ESBLs included [41] and scarce genes blaGES and blaSFO [42], or blaPER, blaTLA, and blaVEB [43] and blaKLUC-5 [44]. In addition, β-lactamase genes that are tolerant to inhibitors have emerged, and they encode enzymes that are partially inhibited by tazobactam and clavulanic acid [75]. In the 30 years since their appearance, the K. pneumonia that produced ESBL have increased worldwide. Based on the reports of World Health Organization (WHO), K. pneumoniae with ESBL has reached the rate of 50% prevalence in numerous parts of the world, and a resistance rate of 30% in the community, indicating its ubiquity of resistance.

4.4. Polymyxin Resistance Gene

Polymyxin disrupts membrane integrity by displacement of extracellular ions (Ca2+/Mg2+) with binding to negatively-charged lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and causing cell lysis [78]. The history of K. pneumoniae polymyxin resistance is shorter compared with other antibiotics, due to the limiting use of medicine in the 1980s and 2000s. Clinically, the first colistin-resistant Klebsiella aerogenes (now categorized as Streptococcus pneumoniae) was isolated when firstly used [79]. In the early 2000s, as more and more carbapenemase XDR K. pneumonia (CPKP) strains appeared, polymyxin became the last class of drugs used [80]. The first nosocomial infection of polymyxin non-sensitive MDR K. pneumoniae was found in Greece in 2004 [80]. Since then, there are more and more clinical reports on the emergence of polymyxin-resistant strains.
The main mechanism of K. pneumoniae polymyxin resistance is target modification by chromosomal mechanism, also known as “LPS modification system”. Strains with this complex system can change the structure of LPS and cause negative ion reduction by affecting on polymyxin binding [10]. These changes in LPS are due to mutations in core genes responsible for the maturation of lipid A (lpxM and its regulator ramA) [45,46] and lipid A neutralization, amino arabinose (pbgP, pmrE), an additional combination of phosphoethanolamine (pmrC), or palmitate (pagP) [47,48]. Multiple LPS modified gene regulators, such as phoPQ, pmrA, and pmrD, are also involved in polymyxin resistance. Mutations in one of the two other regulatory genes (resulting in overexpression of prmB or inactivation of mgrB) are also sufficient to cause polymyxin resistance [49,50]. In 2015, Wright et al. reported that another underlying pathway for LPS modification is TupA-like/glycosyltransferase and CrrAB regulatory systems [81]. Another mechanism of K. pneumoniae colistin resistance is capsular polysaccharide (which may camouflage charged molecules on the outer membrane) [29], as well as high expression of efflux pumps AcrAB-TolC and KpnEF (due to positive regulation by RarA) [46]. Pal et al. found that the deletion of glycosyltransferase WcaJ in K. pneumoniae made the mutant strain show non-mucus phenotype, which increased polymyxin resistance [51]. Plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance has merely been reported recently, and the mcr-1 gene has been identified in China. This gene encodes a family of phosphoethanolamine transferases that share the same activity as PmrC and can bind to phosphoethanolamine [52]. Previous studies have shown that polymyxin resistance occurs in patients, rather than being caused by infection, so limiting the use of polymyxin can reduce mcr-1-mediated polymyxin resistance [82]. Phenotypic screening of acquired polymyxin resistance mediated by the mcr-1 gene includes Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA) and dipicolinic acid (DPA) test [83] and MALDIxin test [84].

4.5. Tigecycline Resistance Gene

Tigecycline is the first generation of glycylcycline [85], which has been used since 2005 and is used to treat K. pneumoniae infection. Tigecycline is a promising drug with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, and is effective even for ESBL-derived strains [86]. Shortly after the first usage, a K. pneumoniae MDR strain (reduced tigecycline sensitivity, MIC = 4 μg/mL) was isolated in a hospital [87]. The known tigecycline tolerance mechanisms are chromosomally encoded, including modifications of the 30S and 16S ribosomal unit targets, as well as changes in cell permeability. Studies have shown that overexpression of efflux pumps AcrAB-TolC and OqxAB and changes in the expression levels of their regulators (RamA, RamR, RarA, and AcrR) can also lead to tigecycline resistance [53]. The mutation of RamR gene can increase the expression of RamA [88]. In addition, Lon and rpsJ genes were also associated with tigecycline resistance in K. pneumoniae [54]. Decreased transcript levels of porin ompK35K can also lead to enhanced resistance of K. pneumoniae strains [55]. The first mutation in the ribosome protein that causes a decrease in sensitivity occurs on the rpsJ-encoded protein S10 [89]. The tetracycline-resistant efflux pumps encoded by the tetA gene were found in non-sensitive K. pneumoniae isolates, but their mechanism of resistance to tigecycline remains unclear [56].

5. Application of Whole Genome Sequencing

Whole genome sequencing enables in-depth identification of bacteria and will provide an effective tool to study and compare in-hospital infections and outbreaks [90] and epidemiological surveillance [91]. To better understand the virulence and prevalence of the K. pneumoniae strain, Brisse et al. developed a free BIGSdb-Kp database [92], which can help scientists to quickly obtain medical and epidemiological information from the K. pneumoniae genome sequence. In addition, several studies have used high-throughput sequencing to obtain and compare the genomes of endemic high- virulent (CG23) and almost avirulent MDR strains (CG258). Bialek-Davenet et al. had shown that CG258 strain is almost virulence-free but exists various drug resistance-associated genes, such as mutated gyrA and parC genes in the quinolone resistance-determining region. Meanwhile, most of the genes of MDR and high virulent strains do not overlap [92]. Struve et al. have shown that the CG23 clinical strain is a highly efficient colonizer of the human intestinal tract [93]. They detected large virulence plasmids encoding two iron vectors (bacteriocin and salmochelin) in all hvKP strains, and found that these strains also have other iron carriers, such as ICE-related Yersin, colibactin, and microbacteria E492. At present, the application of whole genome sequencing in the field of K. pneumoniae also includes exploring the virulence, biofilm formation, and drug resistance mechanism of K. pneumoniae at the genome level. Rimoldi et al. found that the existence of blaKPC gene is related to carbapenem resistance and the relationship between the type 3 pili of K. pneumoniae and iron carrier genes by virulome profile [94]. Meletis et al. revealed that the NDM-1-encoding K. pneumoniae capsular serotype is determined by the nucleotide sequence of the wzc gene. The carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae genome includes 16 drug resistance genes; 12 located in plasmids and 4 in the chromosome [95]. Founou et al. sequenced the whole genome of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae by Illumina MiSeq platform, and found that ESBL-K. pneumoniae contains a variety of β-lactamase genes, including blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1b, blaSHV-1, blaCTX-M-15, and other drug resistance genes. The replicon plasmid types of ESBL-K. pneumoniae were also detected [96]. Generally, whole genome sequencing has been used in various fields of K. pneumoniae study, and we believe that it will become a major tool for K. pneumoniae study in the future.

6. Application of Global Proteomics

Proteomics has been widely used in major aspects of the bacteria field, such as the identification of bacteria [97] and the development of vaccines [98]. This technique can help us to better analyze the molecular mechanisms of bacterial infection and bacteria-host interaction [99]. Kamaladevi et al. showed that K. pneumoniae mainly affected the metabolic pathway of the host during infection, and further experiments showed that K. pneumoniae destroyed the host’s defense system by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway [100]. Proteomics has been applied to investigate the mechanism of drug resistance in K. pneumoniae. Sharma et al. used proteomics (LC-MS/MS) and bioinformatics methods to analyze the possible relationship between K. pneumoniae and carbapenem resistance, and found that 52 related overexpressed proteins and their interactive proteins may have contributed to the survival of K. pneumoniae under meropenem stress and the emergence of meropenem resistance through diverse mechanisms or multiple pathways [101]. The application of proteomics can also be used as an effective treatment for K. pneumoniae. Anand et al. used SDS-PAGE and NLC-MS/MS to find that phage therapy of K. pneumoniae through the nasal approach is an effective measure [102]. Therefore, we can believe that more breakthroughs in the field of K. pneumoniae will be brought by the application of proteomics.

7. Clinical Study of K. pneumoniae

To avoid the large-scale dissemination of K. pneumoniae, it is necessary to conduct epidemiological surveillance for K. pneumoniae, especially extensively antibiotic-resistant strains [103]. Zhang et al. reported a retrospective case-control study of 138 clinical samples with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) bloodstream infections (BSI). They concluded that hematological malignancies (odds ratio (OR) = 4.712, (95% CI = 2.181–10.180), p < 0.001) and the use of cephalosporin (OR = 3.427, (95% CI = 1.513–7.766), p = 0.003) were related with the occurrence of CRKP BSI, while septic shock (OR = 6.418, (95% CI = 1.342–30.686), p = 0.020), mechanical ventilation (OR = 9.502, (95% CI = 2.098–43.033), p = 0.003) and CRKP infection (OR = 9.171, (95% CI = 1.546–54.416), p = 0.015) were independent mortality predictors of K. pneumoniae BSI [104]. Consistent with this finding, Demir et al. found that the strongest independent predictors of ESBL-K. pneumoniae colonization were mechanical ventilation (OR = 4.28, p = 0.000) and hospitalization for longer than 14 days (OR = 6.97, p = 0.000) through the research in the pediatric wards [105]. Gastrointestinal colonization is considered the risk factor of K. pneumoniae infection in ICU patients [106]. Gorrie et al. conducted a 1-year prospective cohort study based on 498 ICU patients. They revealed that K. pneumoniae colonization is an important risk factor for ICU infection (OR = 6.9, p < 0.001). About 50% of K. pneumoniae infection comes from the patient’s own microbiota [107].

8. Conclusions

K. pneumoniae has recently become a notorious virulent factor, due to the increase in the number of seriously infected patients. Considering the evolutionary diversity of clinical strains, it is believed that many infection models, including pneumonia, liver abscess, and GI intestinal colonization, as well as different strains, may be better known for these pathogens. Fortunately, increasing studies have been reported to use high-throughput methods to identify virulent factors as a relatively straightforward way to explore innate immune responses and virulent factors. Despite this, we still do not know how K. pneumoniae interacts with the different components of the innate immune responses, how its virulent factors overcome host responses and allow K. pneumoniae to replicate and construct niches, and how to accelerate the transform of antibiotic resistance mechanism research and clinic treatment strategy. We believe that further study of the biology, physiology, and interactions with host of K. pneumoniae will provide important clues to fight K. pneumoniae infection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.X. and H.W.; formal analysis, G.W. and G.Z.; investigation, G.W., G.Z. and X.C.; writing—original draft preparation, G.W., G.Z., L.X. and H.W.; writing—review and editing, L.X. and H.W.; project administration, L.X.; funding acquisition, L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Program for Innovative Talents of Science and Technology in Henan Province] grant number [No. 18HASTIT048], Projects for College Students in Henan University [No. 2020101901], Program for Science and Technology Development in Henan Province [No. 202102310205].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Podschun, R.; Ullmann, U. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: Epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 589–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Holt, K.E.; Wertheim, H.; Zadoks, R.N.; Baker, S.; Whitehouse, C.A.; Dance, D.; Jenney, A.; Connor, T.R.; Hsu, L.Y.; Severin, J.; et al. Genomic analysis of diversity, population structure, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae, an urgent threat to public health. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E3574–E3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Chew, K.L.; Lin, R.T.P.; Teo, J.W.P. Klebsiella pneumoniae in Singapore: Hypervirulent Infections and the Carbapenemase Threat. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Yao, Z.; Zhan, S.; Yang, Z.; Wei, D.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Kyaw, M.H. Disease burden of intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 29, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Yin, Y.; Chen, H.; Jin, L.; Gu, B.; Xie, L.; Yang, C.; Ma, X.; Li, H.; et al. Epidemiology of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: Report from the China CRE Network. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Martin, R.M.; Bachman, M.A. Colonization, Infection, and the Accessory Genome of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cubero, M.; Grau, I.; Tubau, F.; Pallares, R.; Dominguez, M.A.; Linares, J.; Ardanuy, C. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae clones causing bacteraemia in adults in a teaching hospital in Barcelona, Spain (2007–2013). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2016, 22, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kishibe, S.; Okubo, Y.; Morino, S.; Hirotaki, S.; Tame, T.; Aoki, K.; Ishii, Y.; Ota, N.; Shimomura, S.; Sakakibara, H.; et al. Pediatric hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae septic arthritis. Pediatr. Int. 2016, 58, 382–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Russo, T.A.; Marr, C.M. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Navon-Venezia, S.; Kondratyeva, K.; Carattoli, A. Klebsiella pneumoniae: A major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 252–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Piperaki, E.T.; Syrogiannopoulos, G.A.; Tzouvelekis, L.S.; Daikos, G.L. Klebsiella pneumoniae: Virulence, Biofilm and Antimicrobial Resistance. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2017, 36, 1002–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Paczosa, M.K.; Mecsas, J. Klebsiella pneumoniae: Going on the Offense with a Strong Defense. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 80, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Happel, K.I.; Dubin, P.J.; Zheng, M.; Ghilardi, N.; Lockhart, C.; Quinton, L.J.; Odden, A.R.; Shellito, J.E.; Bagby, G.J.; Nelson, S.; et al. Divergent roles of IL-23 and IL-12 in host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 761–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hua, K.F.; Yang, F.L.; Chiu, H.W.; Chou, J.C.; Dong, W.C.; Lin, C.N.; Lin, C.Y.; Wang, J.T.; Li, L.H.; Chiu, H.W.; et al. Capsular Polysaccharide Is Involved in NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation by Klebsiella pneumoniae Serotype K1. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 3396–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Shon, A.S.; Bajwa, R.P.; Russo, T.A. Hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae: A new and dangerous breed. Virulence 2013, 4, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, G.; Sun, S.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Sun, Y. The pathogenicity of rmpA or aerobactin-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae in infected mice. J. Int. Med. Res. 2019, 47, 4344–4352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Merino, S.; Camprubi, S.; Alberti, S.; Benedi, V.J.; Tomas, J.M. Mechanisms of Klebsiella pneumoniae resistance to complement-mediated killing. Infect. Immun. 1992, 60, 2529–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Llobet, E.; Martinez-Moliner, V.; Moranta, D.; Dahlstrom, K.M.; Regueiro, V.; Tomas, A.; Cano, V.; Perez-Gutierrez, C.; Frank, C.G.; Fernandez-Carrasco, H.; et al. Deciphering tissue-induced Klebsiella pneumoniae lipid A structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E6369–E6378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lam, M.M.C.; Wyres, K.L.; Judd, L.M.; Wick, R.R.; Jenney, A.; Brisse, S.; Holt, K.E. Tracking key virulence loci encoding aerobactin and salmochelin siderophore synthesis in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Genome Med. 2018, 10, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Russo, T.A.; Shon, A.S.; Beanan, J.M.; Olson, R.; MacDonald, U.; Pomakov, A.O.; Visitacion, M.P. Hypervirulent K. pneumoniae secretes more and more active iron-acquisition molecules than “classical” K. pneumoniae thereby enhancing its virulence. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lan, Y.; Zhou, M.; Jian, Z.; Yan, Q.; Wang, S.; Liu, W. Prevalence of pks gene cluster and characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced bloodstream infections. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2019, 33, e22838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Xu, M.; Fu, Y.; Fang, Y.; Xu, H.; Kong, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, L. High prevalence of KPC-2-producing hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae causing meningitis in Eastern China. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 641–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Turton, J.; Davies, F.; Turton, J.; Perry, C.; Payne, Z.; Pike, R. Hybrid Resistance and Virulence Plasmids in “High-Risk” Clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Including Those Carrying blaNDM-5. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mostafavi, M.; Wang, L.; Xie, L.; Takeoka, K.T.; Richie, D.L.; Casey, F.; Ruzin, A.; Sawyer, W.S.; Rath, C.M.; Wei, J.R.; et al. Interplay of Klebsiella pneumoniae fabZ and lpxC Mutations Leads to LpxC Inhibitor-Dependent Growth Resulting from Loss of Membrane Homeostasis. mSphere 2018, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hsieh, P.F.; Hsu, C.R.; Chen, C.T.; Lin, T.L.; Wang, J.T. The Klebsiella pneumoniae YfgL (BamB) lipoprotein contributes to outer membrane protein biogenesis, type-1 fimbriae expression, anti-phagocytosis, and in vivo virulence. Virulence 2016, 7, 587–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Saurel, O.; Iordanov, I.; Nars, G.; Demange, P.; Le Marchand, T.; Andreas, L.B.; Pintacuda, G.; Milon, A. Local and Global Dynamics in Klebsiella pneumoniae Outer Membrane Protein a in Lipid Bilayers Probed at Atomic Resolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1590–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Doi, Y.; Wachino, J.I.; Arakawa, Y. Aminoglycoside Resistance: The Emergence of Acquired 16S Ribosomal RNA Methyltransferases. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 30, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peirano, G.; Ahmed-Bentley, J.; Fuller, J.; Rubin, J.E.; Pitout, J.D. Travel-related carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in Alberta, Canada: The first 3 years. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 1575–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Srinivasan, V.B.; Rajamohan, G. KpnEF, a new member of the Klebsiella pneumoniae cell envelope stress response regulon, is an SMR-type efflux pump involved in broad-spectrum antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 4449–4462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Srinivasan, V.B.; Venkataramaiah, M.; Mondal, A.; Vaidyanathan, V.; Govil, T.; Rajamohan, G. Functional characterization of a novel outer membrane porin KpnO, regulated by PhoBR two-component system in Klebsiella pneumoniae NTUH-K2044. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tsai, Y.K.; Liou, C.H.; Lin, J.C.; Ma, L.; Fung, C.P.; Chang, F.Y.; Siu, L.K. A suitable streptomycin-resistant mutant for constructing unmarked in-frame gene deletions using rpsL as a counter-selection marker. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e109258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Nam, Y.S.; Cho, S.Y.; Yang, H.Y.; Park, K.S.; Jang, J.H.; Kim, Y.T.; Jeong, J.W.; Suh, J.T.; Lee, H.J. Investigation of mutation distribution in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV genes in ciprofloxacin-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolated from blood cultures in a tertiary care university hospital in South Korea, 2005–2010. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2013, 41, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Martinez-Martinez, L.; Hernandez-Alles, S.; Alberti, S.; Tomas, J.M.; Benedi, V.J.; Jacoby, G.A. In vivo selection of porin-deficient mutants of Klebsiella pneumoniae with increased resistance to cefoxitin and expanded-spectrum-cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996, 40, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Mazzariol, A.; Zuliani, J.; Cornaglia, G.; Rossolini, G.M.; Fontana, R. AcrAB Efflux System: Expression and Contribution to Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Klebsiella spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 3984–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Ping, Y.; Ogawa, W.; Kuroda, T.; Tsuchiya, T. Gene cloning and characterization of KdeA, a multidrug efflux pump from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 1962–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wong, M.H.; Chan, E.W.; Chen, S. Evolution and dissemination of OqxAB-like efflux pumps, an emerging quinolone resistance determinant among members of Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 3290–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ruiz, E.; Saenz, Y.; Zarazaga, M.; Rocha-Gracia, R.; Martinez-Martinez, L.; Arlet, G.; Torres, C. qnr, aac(6’)-Ib-cr and qepA genes in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp.: Genetic environments and plasmid and chromosomal location. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 886–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sirot, D.; Sirot, J.; Labia, R.; Morand, A.; Courvalin, P.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A.; Perroux, R.; Cluzel, R. Transferable resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae: Identification of CTX-1, a novel beta-lactamase. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1987, 20, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Calbo, E.; Garau, J. The changing epidemiology of hospital outbreaks due to ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: The CTX-M-15 type consolidation. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 1063–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jimenez-Castellanos, J.C.; Wan Nur Ismah, W.A.K.; Takebayashi, Y.; Findlay, J.; Schneiders, T.; Heesom, K.J.; Avison, M.B. Envelope proteome changes driven by RamA overproduction in Klebsiella pneumoniae that enhance acquired beta-lactam resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Evans, B.A.; Amyes, S.G. OXA beta-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 241–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Bradford, P.A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: Characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 933–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Philippon, A.; Slama, P.; Deny, P.; Labia, R. A Structure-Based Classification of Class A beta-Lactamases, a Broadly Diverse Family of Enzymes. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 29, 29–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Li, P.; Shen, K.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, J.; Zhu, T.; Liu, Y.; Xu, L.; Lin, C.; Zhang, K.; Li, P.; et al. Characterization of a Novel blaKLUC Variant with Reduced beta-Lactam Resistance From an IncA/C Group Plasmid in a Clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolate. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Clements, A.; Tull, D.; Jenney, A.W.; Farn, J.L.; Kim, S.H.; Bishop, R.E.; McPhee, J.B.; Hancock, R.E.; Hartland, E.L.; Pearse, M.J.; et al. Secondary acylation of Klebsiella pneumoniae lipopolysaccharide contributes to sensitivity to antibacterial peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 15569–15577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. De Majumdar, S.; Veleba, M.; Finn, S.; Fanning, S.; Schneiders, T. Elucidating the regulon of multidrug resistance regulator RarA in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 1603–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Mitrophanov, A.Y.; Jewett, M.W.; Hadley, T.J.; Groisman, E.A. Evolution and dynamics of regulatory architectures controlling polymyxin B resistance in enteric bacteria. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e1000233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Llobet, E.; Campos, M.A.; Gimenez, P.; Moranta, D.; Bengoechea, J.A. Analysis of the networks controlling the antimicrobial-peptide-dependent induction of Klebsiella pneumoniae virulence factors. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 3718–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Jayol, A.; Poirel, L.; Brink, A.; Villegas, M.V.; Yilmaz, M.; Nordmann, P. Resistance to colistin associated with a single amino acid change in protein PmrB among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates of worldwide origin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4762–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Poirel, L.; Jayol, A.; Bontron, S.; Villegas, M.V.; Ozdamar, M.; Turkoglu, S.; Nordmann, P. The mgrB gene as a key target for acquired resistance to colistin in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pal, S.; Verma, J.; Mallick, S.; Rastogi, S.K.; Kumar, A.; Ghosh, A.S. Absence of the glycosyltransferase WcaJ in Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC13883 affects biofilm formation, increases polymyxin resistance and reduces murine macrophage activation. Microbiology 2019, 165, 891–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.; Walsh, T.R.; Yi, L.X.; Zhang, R.; Spencer, J.; Doi, Y.; Tian, G.; Dong, B.; Huang, X.; et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: A microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Osei Sekyere, J.; Govinden, U.; Bester, L.A.; Essack, S.Y. Colistin and tigecycline resistance in carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria: Emerging resistance mechanisms and detection methods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 121, 601–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fang, L.; Chen, Q.; Shi, K.; Li, X.; Shi, Q.; He, F.; Zhou, J.; Yu, Y.; Hua, X. Step-Wise Increase in Tigecycline Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae Associated with Mutations in ramR, lon and rpsJ. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kallman, O.; Motakefi, A.; Wretlind, B.; Kalin, M.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; Giske, C.G. Cefuroxime non-susceptibility in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae overexpressing ramA and acrA and expressing ompK35 at reduced levels. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 62, 986–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ahn, C.; Yoon, S.S.; Yong, T.S.; Jeong, S.H.; Lee, K. The Resistance Mechanism and Clonal Distribution of Tigecycline-Nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates in Korea. Yonsei Med. J. 2016, 57, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hall-Stoodley, L.; Costerton, J.W.; Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Clegg, S.; Murphy, C.N. Epidemiology and Virulence of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Fux, C.A.; Costerton, J.W.; Stewart, P.S.; Stoodley, P. Survival strategies of infectious biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, S.K.; Yusoff, K.; Ajat, M.; Thomas, W.; Abushelaibi, A.; Akseer, R.; Lim, S.E.; Lai, K.S. Disruption of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae membrane via induction of oxidative stress by cinnamon bark (Cinnamomum verum J. Presl) essential oil. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Krause, K.M.; Serio, A.W.; Kane, T.R.; Connolly, L.E. Aminoglycosides: An Overview. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Poulikakos, P.; Falagas, M.E. Aminoglycoside therapy in infectious diseases. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2013, 14, 1585–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cirit, O.S.; Fernandez-Martinez, M.; Yayla, B.; Martinez-Martinez, L. Aminoglycoside resistance determinants in multiresistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates from Turkish and Syrian patients. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2019, 66, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Yu, F.; Wang, L.; Pan, J.; Yao, D.; Chen, C.; Zhu, T.; Lou, Q.; Hu, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, X.; et al. Prevalence of 16S rRNA methylase genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from a Chinese teaching hospital: Coexistence of rmtB and armA genes in the same isolate. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 64, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. El-Badawy, M.F.; Tawakol, W.M.; El-Far, S.W.; Maghrabi, I.A.; Al-Ghamdi, S.A.; Mansy, M.S.; Ashour, M.S.; Shohayeb, M.M. Molecular Identification of Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzymes and Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance Genes among Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates Recovered from Egyptian Patients. Int. J. Microbiol. 2017, 2017, 8050432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Guven Gokmen, T.; Nagiyev, T.; Meral, M.; Onlen, C.; Heydari, F.; Koksal, F. NDM-1 and rmtC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates in Turkey. Jundishapur. J. Microbiol. 2016, 9, e33990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Naeem, A.; Badshah, S.L.; Muska, M.; Ahmad, N.; Khan, K. The Current Case of Quinolones: Synthetic Approaches and Antibacterial Activity. Molecules 2016, 21, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Redgrave, L.S.; Sutton, S.B.; Webber, M.A.; Piddock, L.J. Fluoroquinolone resistance: Mechanisms, impact on bacteria, and role in evolutionary success. Trends Microbiol. 2014, 22, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Guillard, T.; de Jong, A.; Limelette, A.; Lebreil, A.L.; Madoux, J.; de Champs, C.; ComPath Study, G. Characterization of quinolone resistance mechanisms in Enterobacteriaceae recovered from diseased companion animals in Europe. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 194, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zheng, J.X.; Lin, Z.W.; Sun, X.; Lin, W.H.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Y.; Qi, G.B.; Deng, Q.W.; Qu, D.; Yu, Z.J. Overexpression of OqxAB and MacAB efflux pumps contributes to eravacycline resistance and heteroresistance in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Jacoby, G.A.; Strahilevitz, J.; Hooper, D.C. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Mirzaii, M.; Jamshidi, S.; Zamanzadeh, M.; Marashifard, M.; Malek Hosseini, S.A.A.; Haeili, M.; Jahanbin, F.; Mansouri, F.; Darban-Sarokhalil, D.; Khoramrooz, S.S. Determination of gyrA and parC mutations and prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Iran. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 13, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Surleac, M.; Czobor Barbu, I.; Paraschiv, S.; Popa, L.I.; Gheorghe, I.; Marutescu, L.; Popa, M.; Sarbu, I.; Talapan, D.; Nita, M.; et al. Whole genome sequencing snapshot of multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains from hospitals and receiving wastewater treatment plants in Southern Romania. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Schultsz, C.; Geerlings, S. Plasmid-mediated resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Changing landscape and implications for therapy. Drugs 2012, 72, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bush, K. Bench-to-bedside review: The role of beta-lactamases in antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections. Crit. Care 2010, 14, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Canton, R.; Akova, M.; Carmeli, Y.; Giske, C.G.; Glupczynski, Y.; Gniadkowski, M.; Livermore, D.M.; Miriagou, V.; Naas, T.; Rossolini, G.M.; et al. Rapid evolution and spread of carbapenemases among Enterobacteriaceae in Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 413–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Livermore, D.M. Current epidemiology and growing resistance of gram-negative pathogens. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2012, 27, 128–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Falagas, M.E.; Kasiakou, S.K. Colistin: The revival of polymyxins for the management of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 40, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Davis, B.; Lilly, H.A.; Lowbury, E.J. Gram-negative bacilli in burns. J. Clin. Pathol. 1969, 22, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Antoniadou, A.; Kontopidou, F.; Poulakou, G.; Koratzanis, E.; Galani, I.; Papadomichelakis, E.; Kopterides, P.; Souli, M.; Armaganidis, A.; Giamarellou, H. Colistin-resistant isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae emerging in intensive care unit patients: First report of a multiclonal cluster. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 59, 786–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Wright, M.S.; Suzuki, Y.; Jones, M.B.; Marshall, S.H.; Rudin, S.D.; van Duin, D.; Kaye, K.; Jacobs, M.R.; Bonomo, R.A.; Adams, M.D. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of colistin-resistant clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae reveal multiple pathways of resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Macesic, N.; Nelson, B.; McConville, T.H.; Giddins, M.J.; Green, D.A.; Stump, S.; Gomez-Simmonds, A.; Annavajhala, M.K.; Uhlemann, A.C. Emergence of Polymyxin Resistance in Clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae Through Diverse Genetic Adaptations: A Genomic, Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 2084–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wink, P.L.; Caierao, J.; Nunes, A.G.A.; Collar, G.D.S.; Martins, J.B.; Dalmolin, T.V.; Pilonetto, M.; Barth, A.L. Evaluation of EDTA and Dipicolinic Acid in Broth Microdilution with Polymyxin B as a Phenotypic Test to Detect the mcr-1 Gene. Microb. Drug Resist. 2020, 26, 329–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dortet, L.; Broda, A.; Bernabeu, S.; Glupczynski, Y.; Bogaerts, P.; Bonnin, R.; Naas, T.; Filloux, A.; Larrouy-Maumus, G. Optimization of the MALDIxin test for the rapid identification of colistin resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae using MALDI-TOF MS. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Livermore, D.M. Tigecycline: What is it, and where should it be used? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2005, 56, 611–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Golan, Y. Empiric therapy for hospital-acquired, Gram-negative complicated intra-abdominal infection and complicated urinary tract infections: A systematic literature review of current and emerging treatment options. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Ruzin, A.; Visalli, M.A.; Keeney, D.; Bradford, P.A. Influence of transcriptional activator RamA on expression of multidrug efflux pump AcrAB and tigecycline susceptibility in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Li, R.; Han, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Du, Z.; Wu, H.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y. Tigecycline Susceptibility and Molecular Resistance Mechanisms among Clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains Isolated during Non-Tigecycline Treatment. Microb. Drug Resist. 2017, 23, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Villa, L.; Feudi, C.; Fortini, D.; Garcia-Fernandez, A.; Carattoli, A. Genomics of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 512 clone highlights the role of RamR and ribosomal S10 protein mutations in conferring tigecycline resistance. Antimicrob. Agents chemother. 2014, 58, 1707–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Wang, X.; Xie, Y.; Li, G.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Tian, L.; Sun, J.; Ou, H.Y.; Qu, H. Whole-Genome-Sequencing characterization of bloodstream infection-causing hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae of capsular serotype K2 and ST374. Virulence 2018, 9, 510–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Lepuschitz, S.; Schill, S.; Stoeger, A.; Pekard-Amenitsch, S.; Huhulescu, S.; Inreiter, N.; Hartl, R.; Kerschner, H.; Sorschag, S.; Springer, B.; et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals resemblance between ESBL-producing and carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Austrian rivers and clinical isolates from hospitals. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 662, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Bialek-Davenet, S.; Criscuolo, A.; Ailloud, F.; Passet, V.; Jones, L.; Delannoy-Vieillard, A.S.; Garin, B.; Le Hello, S.; Arlet, G.; Nicolas-Chanoine, M.H.; et al. Genomic definition of hypervirulent and multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clonal groups. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1812–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Struve, C.; Roe, C.C.; Stegger, M.; Stahlhut, S.G.; Hansen, D.S.; Engelthaler, D.M.; Andersen, P.S.; Driebe, E.M.; Keim, P.; Krogfelt, K.A. Mapping the Evolution of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. mBio 2015, 6, e00630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Rimoldi, S.G.; Gentile, B.; Pagani, C.; Di Gregorio, A.; Anselmo, A.; Palozzi, A.M.; Fortunato, A.; Pittiglio, V.; Ridolfo, A.L.; Gismondo, M.R.; et al. Whole genome sequencing for the molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated at the Italian ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco Hospital, 2012-2014. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Meletis, G.; Chatzopoulou, F.; Chatzidimitriou, D.; Tsingerlioti, F.; Botziori, C.; Tzimagiorgis, G.; Skoura, L. Whole Genome Sequencing of NDM-1-Producing ST11 Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated in a Private Laboratory in Greece. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Founou, R.C.; Founou, L.L.; Allam, M.; Ismail, A.; Essack, S.Y. Whole Genome Sequencing of Extended Spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Hospitalized Patients in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 6266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Boulund, F.; Karlsson, R.; Gonzales-Siles, L.; Johnning, A.; Karami, N.; Al-Bayati, O.; Ahren, C.; Moore, E.R.B.; Kristiansson, E. Typing and Characterization of Bacteria Using Bottom-up Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2017, 16, 1052–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Bittaye, M.; Cash, P. Streptococcus pneumoniae proteomics: Determinants of pathogenesis and vaccine development. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2015, 12, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Saleh, S.; Staes, A.; Deborggraeve, S.; Gevaert, K. Targeted Proteomics for Studying Pathogenic Bacteria. Proteomics 2019, 19, e1800435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kamaladevi, A.; Balamurugan, K. Global Proteomics Revealed Klebsiella pneumoniae Induced Autophagy and Oxidative Stress in Caenorhabditis elegans by Inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway during Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Sharma, D.; Garg, A.; Kumar, M.; Khan, A.U. Proteome profiling of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae clinical isolate (NDM-4): Exploring the mechanism of resistance and potential drug targets. J. Proteom. 2019, 200, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Anand, T.; Virmani, N.; Kumar, S.; Mohanty, A.K.; Pavulraj, S.; Bera, B.C.; Vaid, R.K.; Ahlawat, U.; Tripathi, B.N. Phage therapy for treatment of virulent Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in a mouse model. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 21, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Lee, C.R.; Lee, J.H.; Park, K.S.; Jeon, J.H.; Kim, Y.B.; Cha, C.J.; Jeong, B.C.; Lee, S.H. Antimicrobial Resistance of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae: Epidemiology, Hypervirulence-Associated Determinants, and Resistance Mechanisms. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Zhang, Y.; Guo, L.Y.; Song, W.Q.; Wang, Y.; Dong, F.; Liu, G. Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection and predictors of mortality in Chinese paediatric patients. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Demir, S.; Soysal, A.; Bakir, M.; Kaufmann, M.E.; Yagci, A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in paediatric wards: A nested case-control study. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2008, 44, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Oğuz Mızrakçı, S.; Arda, B.; Erdem, H.A.; Uyar, M.; Tünger, A.; Sipahi, O.R.; Ulusoy, S. [Risk factors for gastrointestinal colonization by ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in anaesthesiology and reanimation intensive care unit]. Mikrobiyol. Bul. 2013, 47, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Gorrie, C.L.; Mirceta, M.; Wick, R.R.; Edwards, D.J.; Thomson, N.R.; Strugnell, R.A.; Pratt, N.F.; Garlick, J.S.; Watson, K.M.; Pilcher, D.V.; et al. Gastrointestinal Carriage Is a Major Reservoir of Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in Intensive Care Patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 65, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijerph 17 06278 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of Klebsiella pneumoniae virulence factors, and biofilm homeostasis.
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of Klebsiella pneumoniae virulence factors, and biofilm homeostasis.
Ijerph 17 06278 g001
Table
Table 1. The virulence, biofilm and antibotic resistance related genes in K. pneumoniae.
Table 1. The virulence, biofilm and antibotic resistance related genes in K. pneumoniae.
The Characteristic of K. PneumoniaeGene NameFunctionReferences
VirulencermpASynthesis of capsular polysaccharides; high-mucus phenotype of hvKP[16]
rmpA2Capsule up-regulation[23]
enterobactinIron carriers; growth and replication of bacteria[12,13]
yersiniabactinIron carriers; growth and replication of bacteria[12,13]
salmochelinIron carriers; growth and replication of bacteria; highly virulent K. pneumoniae[12,13,19]
aerobactinIron carriers; growth and replication of bacteria; detection rate of hvKP; highly virulent K. pneumoniae[12,13,16]
pks gene clusterHost DNA damage; strains virulence enhancement[21]
kpc-2High prevalence and mortality of hvKP[22]
blaNDM-1Large virulent plasmid[23]
BiofilmfabZ; lpxCBiofilm homeostasis[24]
YfgL (BamB)biofilm formation; transcriptional expression of type 1 pili[25]
KpOmpACell-cell recognition, adhesion, and immune response; pathogenicity [26]
Aminoglycoside resistance16S rRNA methylaseEncoding an enzyme that blocks the binding of aminoglycoside antibiotics to the 16S rRNA[27]
aac familiesPlasmid-mediated resistance genes[27]
ant familiesPlasmid-mediated resistance genes[27]
aph familiesPlasmid-mediated resistance genes[27]
AcrAB-TolCEfflux pump systems; resistance to tobramycin and gentamicin[28]
kpnEFEfflux pump systems; significant resistance to tobramycin and spectinomycin[29]
KpnODirectly involved in aminoglycoside resistance; resistance of tobramycin, streptomycin and spectinomycin[30]
rrs or rpsLrpsL mutations associated with high fitness costs and reduced virulence [31]
Quinolone resistanceDNA gyrase (gyrA-gyrB subunit) Topoisomerase IV
(parC-parE subunit)		Resistance of nalidixic acid and ofloxacin[32]
OmpK36Cell permeability[33]
acrABCell permeability[34]
kdeACell permeability[35]
OqxABEfflux pump; plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance[36]
qnrEncoding a family of proteins that protect DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV from quinolone inhibitory activity[37]
aa(6′)-Ib-crQuinolone modification[37]
β-lactam resistanceblaSHV-1 and blaTEM-1Penicillin resistance[38]
blaSHV-2Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) gene[38]
blaTEM-3plasmid-mediated ESBL variant[38]
blaCTX-MESBLs in K. pneumoniae caused by iatrogenic outbreaks[39]
ramAActivating efflux pump; increasing acquired β-lactamase-mediated β-lactam resistance[40]
blaOXA, blaGES, blaSFO, blaPER, blaTLA, blaVEB and bla KLUC-5Horizontal gene transfer acquisition[41,42,43,44]
Polymyxin resistancelpxM, ramAMaturation of lipid A and lipid A neutralization[45,46]
pbgP, pmrECombination of amino arabinose[47,48]
pmrCCombination of phosphoethanolamine[47,48]
pagPCombination of palmitate[47,48]
phoPQ, pmrA, pmrD and mgrBLPS modified gene regulators[49,50]
RarAHigh expression of efflux pumps AcrAB-TolC and KpnEF[46]
WcaJNon-mucus phenotype; increasing polymyxin resistance[51]
mcr-1Encoding a family of phosphoethanolamine transferases that can bind to phosphoethanolamine[52]
Tigecycline resistanceAcrAB-TolC, OqxABOverexpression of efflux pumps lead to tigecycline resistance[53]
RarA, RamA, RamR and AcrRRegulators of efflux pumps[53]
Lon and rpsJEncoding ribosome protein S10[54]
ompK35KDecreased transcript level of porin ompK35K can also lead to enhanced resistance[55]
tetAEncoding tetracycline-resistant efflux pumps[56]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, G.; Zhao, G.; Chao, X.; Xie, L.; Wang, H. The Characteristic of Virulence, Biofilm and Antibiotic Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176278

AMA Style

Wang G, Zhao G, Chao X, Xie L, Wang H. The Characteristic of Virulence, Biofilm and Antibiotic Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(17):6278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Guoying, Guo Zhao, Xiaoyu Chao, Longxiang Xie, and Hongju Wang. 2020. "The Characteristic of Virulence, Biofilm and Antibiotic Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 17: 6278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176278

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop