Next Article in Journal
ARDEP, a Rapid Degenerate Primer Design Pipeline Based on k-mers for Amplicon Microbiome Studies
Previous Article in Journal
What Is the Amount of China’s Building Floor Space from 1996 to 2014?
 
 
Review

A Scoping Review of Respirator Literature and a Survey among Dental Professionals

1
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
2
Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
3
Department of Dentistry, Rho Hospital Stomatological Unit, Rho, 20100 Milano, Italy
4
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 80001, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(16), 5968; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165968
Received: 28 June 2020 / Revised: 11 August 2020 / Accepted: 13 August 2020 / Published: 17 August 2020
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus was discovered in China in late 2019 and subsequently triggered a global pandemic. Dentists, like many other health professionals, are at an increased risk of contracting the virus as they work in close proximity to patients, especially when performing aerosol-generating procedures. Thus, in order for dentists to protect themselves and their patients, it is recommended that practitioners wear filtering facepiece 2 (FFP2) respirators. The prolonged use of these FFP2 respirators has been linked to several side effects. The aim of this paper is to assess the perceived experience associated with N95/FFP2 respirators based on the available literature and data collected through an online survey completed by Italian dental professionals. Articles were included up to May 2020 and literature searches were conducted through The National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases. The search terms included COVID-19, respirators, masks, and discomfort. An online survey was administered to 256 Italian dentists. The results from this survey were in agreement with the available literature. The findings concurred that the prolonged use of respirators was associated with headaches (47.5%), severe exertion and discomfort (50.8%), moderate concentration problems (54.3%), moderate breathing difficulties (63.5%), and consequently, an impaired work ability (85.5%). These findings were not influenced by the number of hours spent wearing the respirator. Despite several side effects, FFP2 respirators are fundamental in protecting dentists and their importance was acknowledged. View Full-Text
Keywords: PPE; FFP2; dental professionals; headache; discomfort PPE; FFP2; dental professionals; headache; discomfort
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Farronato, M.; Boccalari, E.; Del Rosso, E.; Lanteri, V.; Mulder, R.; Maspero, C. A Scoping Review of Respirator Literature and a Survey among Dental Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165968

AMA Style

Farronato M, Boccalari E, Del Rosso E, Lanteri V, Mulder R, Maspero C. A Scoping Review of Respirator Literature and a Survey among Dental Professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(16):5968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165968

Chicago/Turabian Style

Farronato, Marco, Elisa Boccalari, Ettore Del Rosso, Valentina Lanteri, Riaan Mulder, and Cinzia Maspero. 2020. "A Scoping Review of Respirator Literature and a Survey among Dental Professionals" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 16: 5968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165968

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop