Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Introduction could be improved. At the end of this paragraph you should clearly state the aim of your paper.

Methods should be improved and detailed the search strategy according to international standard of reviews. I suggest to include this citation about the relationship between decent work and occupational health: Chirico F. May the gross domestic product growth be a valid indicator of decent work? Ann Ig. 2017;29(4):332-335.

Author Response

please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review the article.

The work deals with a very important topic, especially in the face of the current situation, which we can observe all over the world.

However, the article needs to be improved before publication.

 

Please find some comments and suggestions in the attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you to the Authors for improving the article.

 In scientific work everything must be precisely specified, please mention in the methodology section those important and "key documents" that were used to prepare the thesis.

Author Response

We thank again for comments and valuable recommendation for the improvement of the article.

We have complemented the article according to your recommendations as the following:

a) Added a number of references providing more information on background, ILO evaluations and methodology

b) Added Annex 2 on ILO and UN reports which were analysed for this review

c) Added Annex 3 on ILO Decent Work external evaluations in 2006-2018