Next Article in Journal
Validation of the Malay Version of Mini-IPIP among Substance Use Disorder Patients Attending Methadone Clinics in Malaysia
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Electronic Cigarettes on Selected Antibacterial Properties of Saliva
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Previous Use of Mammography as a Proxy for General Health Checks in Association with Better Outcomes after Major Surgeries

by
Ying-Hsuan Tai
1,2,
Ta-Liang Chen
2,3,
Yih-Giun Cherng
1,2,
Chun-Chieh Yeh
4,5,
Chuen-Chau Chang
2,6,7,† and
Chien-Chang Liao
2,6,7,8,9,*,†
1
Department of Anesthesiology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan
2
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
3
Department of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
4
Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
5
Department of Surgery, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
6
Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan
7
Anesthesiology and Health Policy Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan
8
Research Center of Big Data and Meta-Analysis, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
9
School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(22), 4432; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224432
Submission received: 26 August 2019 / Revised: 7 November 2019 / Accepted: 7 November 2019 / Published: 12 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Women's Health)

Abstract

:
Although previous studies have shown that health checks may improve several risk factors for chronic diseases, the effect of preoperative health checks on postoperative recovery in surgical patients remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the association between preoperative use of mammography and the risk of perioperative complications. We conducted a matched cohort study of 152,411 patients aged ≥47 years who received mammography screening and later underwent major surgery from 2008 to 2013. Using a propensity score matching procedure adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, medical condition, surgery type, and anesthesia type, 152,411 controls who underwent surgery but were not screened were selected. We collected patients’ characteristics and medical conditions from claims data of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. Logistic regressions were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality associated with mammography screening. Patients receiving mammography prior to major surgery had significantly lower risks of perioperative complications, including pneumonia, septicemia, acute renal failure, stroke, urinary tract infection, deep wound infection, acute myocardial infarction, intensive care unit stay, and 30 day in-hospital mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.38–0.53). The association was consistent across each stratum of age, number of hospitalizations, emergency visits, and comorbidities. In conclusion, preoperative use of mammography was strongly associated with fewer perioperative complications and less in-hospital mortality after major surgeries. The evidence provided by this study justifies the implementation of preoperative health checks in clinical practice.

1. Introduction

Over 300 million surgical procedures were performed worldwide in 2012, and the global volume of surgery continues to increase [1]. Multiple factors influence the postoperative outcome, including patient factors, the clinical experience of surgeons, and the healthcare quality of hospitals [2,3]. Regarding patient factors, patients’ underlying health conditions and knowledge, attitude, and practices about diseases significantly affect treatment effectiveness and clinical outcome [4]. To enhance the postoperative outcome, it is important for clinicians to optimize patients’ health conditions and improve their health awareness before surgery.
In preventive medicine, the aim of health checks is to prevent the development or progression of a disease by conducting comprehensive examinations that identify and manage chronic diseases and their risk factors, most of which are cardiovascular diseases or malignancies [5]. It is postulated that early detection and management of biomedical and lifestyle risk factors are able to avert or delay chronic diseases. Current studies have demonstrated that periodic health evaluations can reduce established risk factors of chronic diseases and improve the delivery of some recommended preventive services [5,6]. Nonetheless, it is currently unknown whether health checks prior to surgery improve patients’ postoperative recovery.
Mammography has been one of the comprehensive examinations in the national health check program under the coverage of national health insurance in Taiwan [7]. Women aged between 45 and 69 years or those aged between 40 and 44 years with a family history of breast cancer are offered free mammograms biennially [8]. To investigate the putative beneficial effect of preoperative health checks on short-term outcomes in patients following major surgeries, mammography was used as a representative of health checks in this nationwide cohort study. We hypothesized that patients receiving preoperative mammography had a lower risk of major complications and in-hospital mortality following major surgery compared to their counterparts.

2. Methods

2.1. Source of Data

The reimbursement claims data of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance was used in this study. The insurance program was established in March 1995 and covers more than 99% of all Taiwanese residents. The research database of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance includes inpatient and outpatient demographic characteristics, physicians’ primary and secondary diagnoses, treatment procedures, prescriptions, and medical expenditures. Research articles based on data from this database have been accepted in outstanding scientific journals [9,10]. For the purpose of protecting personal privacy, the electronic database was decoded, with patient identifications scrambled for further public access for research. This study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. According to official regulations, informed consent is not required because of the use of decoded and scrambled patient identifications. However, this study was evaluated and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University (TMU-JIRB-201905042; TMU-JIRB-201902053).

2.2. Study Design

Among the 3.9 million Taiwan residents who underwent major inpatient surgeries (defined as procedures requiring general, epidural, or spinal anesthesia, as well as hospitalization for >1 day) from 2008 to 2013, we examined medical claims and identified 698,308 female patients aged 47–70 years (Supplementary Materials, Table S1). Of these, 194,206 had received a mammography exam within 24 months before the index surgery. Each patient who underwent surgery and received mammography was randomly matched to a patient without mammography who underwent surgery using a propensity score matched-pair procedure. After propensity score matching (case-control ratio, 1:1), there were 152,411 patients with and 152,411 without preoperative mammography (Figure 1).

2.3. Measures and Definitions

By the regulations of the Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan, people with low-income status were qualified to have the registration fee and medical copayment waived when visiting medical services. Low-income status in this study was defined as having a low income within two years before surgery. The number of hospitalizations and emergency visits of patients who visited medical services for inpatient care or emergency care within 24 months before the index surgery were identified. According to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and physicians’ diagnoses, we defined patients’ medical conditions including hypertension (ICD-9-CM 401–405), diabetes (ICD-9-CM 250), mental disorders (ICD-9-CM 290–319), cancer (ICD-9-CM 140-208, 230–234), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ICD-9- CM 491, 492, 496), ischemic heart disease (ICD-9-CM 410–414), atherosclerosis (ICD-9-CM 440), liver cirrhosis (ICD-9-CM 571.2, 571.5, 571.6), heart failure (ICD-9-CM 428), stroke (ICD-9-CM 430–438), and Parkinson’s disease (ICD-9-CM 332). Renal dialysis was defined by administration codes (D8 and D9). These coexisting medical conditions were identified 24 months before the index surgery. Postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery included postoperative bleeding, deep wound infection, stroke, pneumonia, septicemia, urinary tract infection, pulmonary embolism, and acute renal failure and were also defined according to ICD-9-CM and physician’s diagnosis. In this study, the medical expenditures of surgical patients were calculated by counting all National Health Insurance payments during the index surgical hospitalization. This included payments for surgical procedures, medications, admission stay, and materials. The length of hospital stay was calculated from the first day to the last day of surgical hospitalization.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We used matched analysis with propensity score to determine associations between mammography and postoperative outcomes. A nonparsimonious multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate a propensity score for surgical patients who did or did not receive mammography. Clinical significance guided the initial choice of covariates in this logistic model to include age, sex, low income, hypertension, diabetes, mental disorders, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ischemic heart disease, atherosclerosis, liver cirrhosis, heart failure, stroke, Parkinson’s disease, and renal dialysis. We matched mammography recipients to nonrecipients using a greedy matching algorithm (without replacement) with a caliper width of 0.2 SDs of the log odds of the estimated propensity score. Categorical variables are summarized using frequencies (%) and were compared between mammography recipients and nonrecipients by using chi-square tests. Continuous variables are presented as the means ± standard deviations and were compared using t-tests. Logistic regressions were used to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of postoperative adverse outcomes associated with mammography. We also performed further analyses stratified by age, number of hospitalizations, number of emergency visits, and number of medical conditions to examine the association between mammography and postoperative adverse events within these strata.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of patients with and without mammography who underwent major surgeries. Because we used matched analysis with a propensity score, there were no significant differences between the groups of surgical patients with and without mammography analyzed by age, low income, types of surgery and anesthesia, number of hospitalizations, number of emergency visits, hypertension, diabetes, mental disorders, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ischemic heart disease, atherosclerosis, liver cirrhosis, heart failure, stroke, Parkinson’s disease, and renal dialysis.
Compared with patients without mammography, patients with mammography had lower risks of postoperative stroke (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.53–0.60), acute myocardial infarction (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.48–0.80), acute renal failure (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47–0.62), deep wound infection (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76–0.96), septicemia (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71–0.78), pneumonia (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.59–0.70), urinary tract infection (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90–0.96), and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.38–0.53) after surgery (Table 2). Mammography was also associated with admission to the intensive care unit after surgery (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.66–0.70). The mean amount of medical expenditures ($2392 ± $2627 vs. $2579 ± $3046, p < 0.0001) and length of hospital stay (6.0 ± 6.5 vs. 6.9 ± 8.3 days, p < 0.0001) were significantly lower for patients with mammography than for patients without mammography.
In the stratification analysis (Table 3), associations between mammography and reduced postoperative adverse events were significant in women aged 47–49 years (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.71–0.90), 50–54 years (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.61–0.71), 55–59 years (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.65–0.75), 60–64 years (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60–0.70), and 65–70 years (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.59–0.69). Use of mammography was also associated with reduced postoperative adverse events in women who had 0 (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.58–0.65), 1 (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.66–0.73), 2 (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67–0.79), 3 (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62–0.85), or ≥4 (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.93) medical conditions. The reduced risk of postoperative adverse events was associated with use of mammography in women and the number of emergency visits (0, 1, 2, ≥3) and hospitalizations (0, 1, 2, ≥3). Compared with the control group (Table 4), the adjusted ORs of postoperative adverse events associated with use of mammography within preoperative 30, 60, 90, 120, and 365 days were 0.64 (95% CI 0.57–0.71), 0.65 (95% CI 0.60–0.70), 0.65 (95% CI 0.60–0.69), 0.65 (95% CI 0.61–0.69), and 0.65 (95% CI 0.63–0.68), respectively.

4. Discussion

With large-scale, population-based, and cross-sectional analyses adjusted for patients’ demographics, hospital characteristics, medical comorbidities, and types of surgeries, we found that surgical patients with preoperative use of mammography had significantly lower postoperative complications and mortality. Using mammography preoperatively was associated with a reduced risk of intensive care, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower medical expenditures. The association between preoperative use of mammography and postoperative adverse events was significant in many various subgroups. Our study is the first to investigate the preoperative use of mammography as a representative of health checks that are associated with better postoperative outcomes.
Whether general health checks decrease morbidity and mortality from diseases remains unclear, and the results of previous studies are mixed and inconclusive. Health checks have been reported to improve the detection and control of diseases and their risk factors [5,6,11,12]. However, a meta-analysis including 14 randomized trials demonstrated that general health checks did not reduce morbidity or mortality caused by either cardiovascular disease or cancer [13]. Despite these analyses, there is a lack of evidence about the effect of health checks on surgical patients. Our study demonstrated how mammography is beneficial for postoperative outcomes, which may be explained by the following four reasons.
First, screening mammography was typically combined with other examinations for common chronic diseases in the Taiwanese national health check program, including fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer, pap smear tests for cervical cancer, blood pressure, and fasting blood glucose measurement [7]. Taiwanese health check programs have been suggested to reduce the mortality rates in breast cancer [8], colorectal cancer [14], and hepatocellular carcinoma [15]. In our study, patients receiving mammography had a lower mortality risk, which may be attributed to such health checks identifying and treating previously unrecognized diseases or improving the control of pre-existing medical conditions. Various comorbidities have been reported to adversely affect postoperative recovery. For example, hypertension, poor preoperative glycemic control, and morbid obesity are established risk factors of perioperative cardiovascular events and mortality [16,17,18,19]. Health checks have been shown to enhance the control of blood pressure and body mass index and decrease modeled cardiovascular disease risk [5,11].
Second, those not attending screening programs were more likely to have limited literacy skills and health knowledge [20,21]. One national survey indicated that approximately 30% of Taiwanese adults have low health literacy [22], and low literacy is linked to several adverse health outcomes, including health knowledge, intermediate disease markers, measures of morbidity, general health condition, and utilization of health resources [23]. In addition, patients’ health knowledge and attitude may have a practical effect on self-care behavior and medical compliance in chronic illnesses, such as hypertension and diabetes [4,24]. Educational interventions in health checks may improve health knowledge and medication adherence in patients with low health literacy levels [25]. In Taiwanese health check programs, participants would be given instruction and education to increase their knowledge of common chronic diseases and to influence their perception and attitude towards them [7].
Third, nonparticipants in mammography screening may have lower social support for medical care, smaller social network size, and less outpatient utilization compared with participants, which may impede their access and adherence to health check programs [26]. Patients’ social support may significantly affect postoperative recovery and is predictive of surgical outcome, including the length of hospital stay and mortality [27,28,29]. In addition, patients’ social support and social network members have an important influence on chronic illness self-management, which may further affect postoperative recovery and the risk of complications [30].
Fourth, research has shown that low-income women are less likely to obtain mammograms than their more affluent counterparts regardless of free services [31], and each $10,000 increment in annual household income increased mammography utilization rates by 2.5% [32]. Low socioeconomic status is associated with increased operative and cardiovascular mortality rates among surgical patients [33,34]. Of note, our analysis has accounted for patients’ income to evaluate the independent association between the use of mammography and surgical outcome.
Attention to some limitations of this study is needed. First, our study is an observational study without randomized selection of exposure and nonexposure groups. The effects of unmeasured confounders cannot be fully adjusted, and self-selection bias cannot be avoided. Second, we have no clinical data on detailed surgical and anesthetic techniques, physicians’ personal skills and experiences, and some medical treatment materials that were not covered by health insurance. We also have no information regarding the family history of breast cancer in this study. Third, the analysis cannot distinguish between organized screening and opportunistic screening in which the mammography was performed. Patients undergoing mammography in opportunistic screening may not have additional health evaluations performed in multiple screening programs and, therefore, have a lower chance to detect and treat comorbid diseases. Fourth, information on education level, job, unemployment, and family status (living alone or with families) was not available in Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. This is also a study limitation, because we could not evaluate these factors on the association between mammography use and postoperative outcomes. In addition, information regarding smoking, drinking alcohol, physical activity, and other lifestyle characteristics was not available in the insurance claims. Finally, our study focuses on female surgical populations, which limited the generalizability of the findings.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, previous use of mammography as a proxy of health checks was associated with reduced postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, and consumption of medical resources. The beneficial effect was consistent across each stratum of age, number of hospitalizations, emergency visits, and comorbidities. Our results did not implicate a causal relationship between use of mammography and postoperative outcome. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether the promotion of health behaviors has perioperative outcome benefits.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4432/s1. Table S1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-H.T., T.-L.C., Y.-G.C., C.-C.Y., C.-C.C., and C.-C.L.; formal analysis, C.-C.L.; funding acquisition, T.-L.C.; investigation, Y.-H.T., T.-L.C., Y.-G.C., C.-C.Y., C.-C.C., and C.-C.L.; methodology, Y.-H.T., T.-L.C., Y.-G.C., C.-C.Y., C.-C.C., and C.-C.L.; project administration, T.-L.C., Y.-G.C., and C.-C.L.; resources, T.-L.C.; supervision, T.-L.C., Y.-G.C., and C.-C.L.; validation, Y.-H.T., T.-L.C., Y.-G.C., C.-C.Y., C.-C.C., and C.-C.L.; visualization, Y.-H.T., T.-L.C., Y.-G.C., C.-C.Y., C.-C.C., and C.-C.L.; writing—original draft, Y.-H.T. and C.-C.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.-H.T., T.-L.C., Y.-G.C., C.-C.Y., C.-C.C., and C.-C.L.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST106-2314-B-038-036-MY3).

Acknowledgments

This study is partially based on data obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the Bureau of National Health Insurance of the Taiwan Department of Health and managed by the National Health Research Institutes. The interpretations and conclusions in this paper do not represent those of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, the Taiwan Department of Health, or the National Health Research Institutes.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ICD-9-CMInternational Code of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification
ORodds ratio
CIconfidence interval

References

  1. Weiser, T.G.; Haynes, A.B.; Molina, G.; Lipsitz, S.R.; Esquivel, M.M.; Uribe-Leitz, T.; Fu, R.; Azad, T.; Chao, T.E.; Berry, W.R.; et al. Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. Bull. World Health Organ. 2016, 94, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Choudhry, N.K.; Fletcher, R.H.; Soumerai, S.B. Systematic review: The relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann. Intern. Med. 2005, 142, 260–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Birkmeyer, J.D.; Siewers, A.E.; Finlayson, E.V.; Stukel, T.A.; Lucas, F.L.; Batista, I.; Welch, H.G.; Wennberg, D.E. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 1128–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Qureshi, N.N.; Hatcher, J.; Chaturvedi, N.; Jafar, T.H. Effect of general practitioner education on adherence to antihypertensive drugs: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Br. Med. J. 2007, 335, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Si, S.; Moss, J.R.; Sullivan, T.R.; Newton, S.S.; Stocks, N.P. Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2014, 64, e47–e53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Boulware, L.E.; Marinopoulos, S.; Phillips, K.A.; Hwang, C.W.; Maynor, K.; Merenstein, D.; Wilson, R.F.; Barnes, G.J.; Bass, E.B.; Powe, N.R.; et al. Systematic review: The value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2007, 146, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, T.H.; Chiu, Y.H.; Luh, D.L.; Yen, M.F.; Wu, H.M.; Chen, L.S.; Tung, T.H.; Huang, C.C.; Chan, C.C.; Shiu, M.N.; et al. Community-based multiple screening model: Design, implementation, and analysis of 42,387 participants. Cancer 2004, 100, 1734–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yen, A.M.; Tsau, H.S.; Fann, J.C.; Chen, S.L.; Chiu, S.Y.; Lee, Y.C.; Pan, S.L.; Chiu, H.M.; Kuo, W.H.; Chang, K.J.; et al. Population-based breast cancer screening with risk-based and universal mammography screening compared with clinical breast examination: A propensity score analysis of 1429890 Taiwanese women. JAMA Oncol. 2016, 2, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liao, C.C.; Shen, W.W.; Chang, C.C.; Chang, H.; Chen, T.L. Surgical adverse outcomes in patients with schizophrenia: a population-based study. Ann. Surg. 2013, 257, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yeh, C.C.; Liao, C.C.; Chang, Y.C.; Jeng, L.B.; Yang, H.R.; Shih, C.C.; Chen, T.L. Adverse outcomes after noncardiac surgery in patients with diabetes: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 3216–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Martin, A.; Saunders, C.L.; Harte, E.; Griffin, S.J.; MacLure, C.; Mant, J.; Meads, C.; Walter, F.M.; Usher-Smith, J.A. Delivery and impact of the NHS Health Check in the first 8 years: A systematic review. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2018, 68, e449–e459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Forster, A.S.; Burgess, C.; Dodhia, H.; Fuller, F.; Miller, J.; McDermott, L.; Gulliford, M.C. Do health checks improve risk factor detection in primary care? Matched cohort study using electronic health records. J. Public Health 2016, 38, 552–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Krogsbøll, L.T.; Jørgensen, K.J.; Grønhøj Larsen, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. Med. J. 2012, 345, e7191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chiu, H.M.; Chen, S.L.; Yen, A.M.; Chiu, S.Y.; Fann, J.C.; Lee, Y.C.; Pan, S.L.; Wu, M.S.; Liao, C.S.; Chen, H.H.; et al. Effectiveness of fecal immunochemical testing in reducing colorectal cancer mortality from the One Million Taiwanese Screening Program. Cancer 2015, 121, 3221–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yeh, Y.P.; Hu, T.H.; Cho, P.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Yen, A.M.; Chen, S.L.; Chiu, S.Y.; Fann, J.C.; Su, W.W.; Fang, Y.J.; et al. Evaluation of abdominal ultrasonography mass screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. Hepatology 2014, 59, 1840–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sanders, R.D. How important is peri-operative hypertension? Anaesthesia 2014, 69, 948–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Noordzij, P.G.; Boersma, E.; Schreiner, F.; Kertai, M.D.; Feringa, H.H.; Dunkelgrun, M.; Bax, J.J.; Klein, J.; Poldermans, D. Increased preoperative glucose levels are associated with perioperative mortality in patients undergoing noncardiac, nonvascular surgery. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2007, 156, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gustafsson, U.O.; Thorell, A.; Soop, M.; Ljungqvist, O.; Nygren, J. Haemoglobin A1c as a predictor of postoperative hyperglycaemia and complications after major colorectal surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2009, 96, 1358–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Alizadeh, R.F.; Moghadamyeghaneh, Z.; Whealon, M.D.; Hanna, M.H.; Mills, S.D.; Pigazzi, A.; Stamos, M.J.; Carmichael, J.C. Body mass index significantly impacts outcomes of colorectal surgery. Am. Surg. 2016, 82, 930–935. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Davis, T.C.; Arnold, C.; Berkel, H.J.; Nandy, I.; Jackson, R.H.; Glass, J. Knowledge and attitude on screening mammography among low-literate, low-income women. Cancer 1996, 78, 1912–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miller, D.P.; Brownlee, C.D.; McCoy, T.P.; Pignone, M.P. The effect of health literacy on knowledge and receipt of colorectal cancer screening: A survey study. BMC. Fam. Pract. 2007, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lee, S.Y.; Tsai, T.I.; Tsai, Y.W.; Kuo, K.N. Health literacy, health status, and healthcare utilization of Taiwanese adults: Results from a national survey. BMC. Public Health 2010, 10, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Dewalt, D.A.; Berkman, N.D.; Sheridan, S.; Lohr, K.N.; Pignone, M.P. Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2004, 19, 1228–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ghannadi, S.; Amouzegar, A.; Amiri, P.; Karbalaeifar, R.; Tahmasebinejad, Z.; Kazempour-Ardebili, S. Evaluating the effect of knowledge, attitude, and practice on self-management in Type 2 diabetic patients on dialysis. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 2016, 3730875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Muir, K.W.; Ventura, A.; Stinnett, S.S.; Enfiedjian, A.; Allingham, R.R.; Lee, P.P. The influence of health literacy level on an educational intervention to improve glaucoma medication adherence. Patient Educ. Couns. 2012, 87, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Jensen, L.F.; Pedersen, A.F.; Andersen, B.; Vedsted, P. Social support and non-participation in breast cancer screening: A Danish cohort study. J. Public Health 2016, 38, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Rosenberger, P.H.; Jokl, P.; Ickovics, J. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: An evidence-based literature review. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2006, 14, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Oxman, T.E.; Freeman, D.H.; Manheimer, E.D. Lack of social participation or religious strength and comfort as risk factors for death after cardiac surgery in the elderly. Psychosom. Med. 1995, 57, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Contrada, R.J.; Goyal, T.M.; Cather, C.; Rafalson, L.; Idler, E.L.; Krause, T.J. Psychosocial factors in outcomes of heart surgery: The impact of religious involvement and depressive symptoms. Health Psychol. 2004, 23, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Gallant, M.P. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: A review and directions for research. Health Educ. Behav. 2003, 30, 170–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Peek, M.E.; Han, J.H. Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2004, 19, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Barton, M.B.; Moore, S.; Shtatland, E.; Bright, R. The relation of household income to mammography utilization in a prepaid health care system. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2001, 16, 200–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Birkmeyer, N.J.; Gu, N.; Baser, O.; Morris, A.M.; Birkmeyer, J.D. Socioeconomic status and surgical mortality in the elderly. Med. Care 2008, 46, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ultee, K.H.J.; Tjeertes, E.K.M.; Bastos Gonçalves, F.; Rouwet, E.V.; Hoofwijk, A.G.M.; Stolker, R.J.; Verhagen, H.J.M.; Hoeks, S.E. The relation between household income and surgical outcome in the Dutch setting of equal access to and provision of healthcare. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0191464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The selection process of study subjects.
Figure 1. The selection process of study subjects.
Ijerph 16 04432 g001
Table 1. Characteristics of surgical patients with and without preoperative use of mammography.
Table 1. Characteristics of surgical patients with and without preoperative use of mammography.
CharacteristicsUse of Mammographyp-Value
No (n = 152,411)Yes (n = 152,411)
Age, yearsn(%)n(%)1.0000
47–4917,450(11.5)17,450(11.5)
50–5438,469(25.2)38,469(25.2)
55–5937,676(24.7)37,676(24.7)
60–6432,143(21.1)32,143(21.1)
65–7026,673(17.5)26,673(17.5)
Low income 1.0000
No15,1396(99.3)15,1396(99.3)
Yes1015(0.7)1015(0.7)
Number of hospitalizations 1.0000
012,2469(80.4)12,2469(80.4)
122,834(15.0)22,834(15.0)
24017(2.6)4017(2.6)
≥33091(2.0)3091(2.0)
Number of emergency visits 1.0000
0108,688(71.3)108,688(71.3)
130,014(19.7)30,014(19.7)
28579(5.6)8579(5.6)
≥35130(3.4)5130(3.4)
Types of surgery 1.0000
Musculoskeletal52,827(34.7)52,827(34.7)
Digestive24,466(16.1)24,466(16.1)
Neurosurgery19,619(12.9)19,619(12.9)
Kidney, ureter, bladder9539(6.3)9539(6.3)
Respiratory5462(3.6)5462(3.6)
Cardiovascular2620(1.7)2620(1.7)
Eye1657(1.1)1657(1.1)
Skin1494(1.0)1494(1.0)
Delivery, cesarean section, abortion150(0.1)150(0.1)
Others34,577(22.7)34,577(22.7)
Types of anesthesia 1.0000
General124,417(81.6)124,417(81.6)
Epidural or spinal27,994(18.4)27,994(18.4)
Medical conditions
Hypertension40,639(26.7)40,639(26.7)1.0000
Diabetes19,838(13.0)19,838(13.0)1.0000
Mental disorders25,142(16.5)25,142(16.5)1.0000
Cancer19,580(12.9)19,580(12.9)1.0000
COPD10,318(6.8)10,318(6.8)1.0000
Ischemic heart disease6964(4.6)6964(4.6)1.0000
Atherosclerosis1997(1.3)1997(1.3)1.0000
Liver cirrhosis1936(1.3)1936(1.3)1.0000
Heart failure578(0.4)578(0.4)1.0000
Stroke1059(0.7)1059(0.7)1.0000
Renal dialysis684(0.5)684(0.5)1.0000
Parkinson’s disease326(0.2)326(0.2)1.0000
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Table 2. Outcomes after major surgeries in patients with and without mammography.
Table 2. Outcomes after major surgeries in patients with and without mammography.
Postoperative OutcomesUse of MammographyRisk of Outcomes
No (n = 152,411)Yes (n = 152,411)
Events%Event%OR(95% CI)*
30 day in-hospital mortality4660.32120.10.45(0.38–0.53)
Postoperative complications
Pneumonia13780.98950.60.64(0.59–0.70)
Septicemia38792.629221.90.75(0.71–0.78)
Acute renal failure5340.42910.20.54(0.47–0.62)
Pulmonary embolism1060.1980.10.92(0.70–1.22)
Stroke26601.815421.00.56(0.53–0.60)
Urinary tract infection66544.462334.10.93(0.90–0.96)
Deep wound infection6450.45500.40.85(0.76–0.96)
Acute myocardial infarction1580.1990.10.62(0.48–0.80)
Postoperative bleeding6990.56950.50.99(0.90–1.11)
Intensive care unit stay10,3616.875064.90.68(0.66–0.70)
Medical expenditure, USD†2579 ± 30462392 ± 2627p < 0.0001
Length of hospital stay, days†6.9 ± 8.36.0 ± 6.5p < 0.0001
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; *Adjusted for all covariates listed in Table 1; † Mean ± SD.
Table 3. The stratified analysis for the association between use of mammography and postoperative adverse events.
Table 3. The stratified analysis for the association between use of mammography and postoperative adverse events.
Factors of Stratification Adverse Events*
StratumsMammographynEventsRate, %OR(95% CI)†
Age 47–49 yearsNo17,4506273.61.00(reference)
Yes17,4505042.90.80(0.71–0.90)
Age 50–54 yearsNo38,46916444.31.00(reference)
Yes38,46911092.90.66(0.61–0.71)
Age 55–59 yearsNo37,67618194.81.00(reference)
Yes37,67613043.50.70(0.65–0.75)
Age 60–64 yearsNo32,14318695.81.00(reference)
Yes32,14312503.90.65(0.60–0.70)
Age 65–70 yearsNo26,67318557.01.00(reference)
Yes26,67312334.60.64(0.59–0.69)
0 hospitalizationNo122,46957984.71.00(reference)
Yes122,46938903.20.65(0.63–0.68)
1 hospitalizationNo22,83413025.71.00(reference)
Yes22,8349404.10.71(0.65–0.77)
2 hospitalizationNo40173318.21.00(reference)
Yes40172716.80.80(0.68–0.95)
≥3 hospitalizationsNo309138312.41.00(reference)
Yes30912999.70.75(0.63–0.88)
0 emergency visitsNo108,68850034.61.00(reference)
Yes108,68832923.00.64(0.61–0.67)
1 emergency visitNo30,01416855.61.00(reference)
Yes30,01412374.10.72(0.67–0.77)
2 emergency visitsNo85796117.11.00(reference)
Yes85794675.40.75(0.66–0.85)
≥3 emergency visitsNo513051510.01.00(reference)
Yes51304047.90.76(0.66–0.87)
0 medical conditionNo61,93827234.41.00(reference)
Yes61,93817202.80.62(0.58–0.65)
1 medical conditionNo60,22831845.31.00(reference)
Yes60,22822663.80.69(0.66–0.73)
2 medical conditionsNo23,69214626.21.00(reference)
Yes23,69210874.60.73(0.67–0.79)
3 medical conditionsNo55533686.61.00(reference)
Yes55532755.00.73(0.62–0.85)
≥4 medical conditionsNo1000777.71.00(reference)
Yes1000525.20.64(0.44–0.93)
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; *Adverse events included with 30 day in-hospital mortality, pneumonia, septicemia, acute renal failure, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction; †Adjusted for all covariates listed in Table 1.
Table 4. The stratified analysis for the association between use of mammography and postoperative adverse events.
Table 4. The stratified analysis for the association between use of mammography and postoperative adverse events.
Time Period Before Surgery Adverse Events*
nEventsRate, %OR(95% CI)†
No use of mammography152,41178145.11.00(reference)
Use mammography within 30 days13,1843872.90.64(0.57–0.71)
Use mammography within 60 days22,9037053.10.65(0.60–0.70)
Use mammography within 90 days30,5569613.20.65(0.60–0.69)
Use mammography within 120 days37,49211993.20.65(0.61–0.69)
Use mammography within 365 days87,94429773.40.65(0.63–0.68)
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; *Adverse events included with 30 day in-hospital mortality, pneumonia, septicemia, acute renal failure, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction; †Adjusted for all covariates listed in Table 1.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tai, Y.-H.; Chen, T.-L.; Cherng, Y.-G.; Yeh, C.-C.; Chang, C.-C.; Liao, C.-C. Previous Use of Mammography as a Proxy for General Health Checks in Association with Better Outcomes after Major Surgeries. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224432

AMA Style

Tai Y-H, Chen T-L, Cherng Y-G, Yeh C-C, Chang C-C, Liao C-C. Previous Use of Mammography as a Proxy for General Health Checks in Association with Better Outcomes after Major Surgeries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(22):4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224432

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tai, Ying-Hsuan, Ta-Liang Chen, Yih-Giun Cherng, Chun-Chieh Yeh, Chuen-Chau Chang, and Chien-Chang Liao. 2019. "Previous Use of Mammography as a Proxy for General Health Checks in Association with Better Outcomes after Major Surgeries" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 22: 4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224432

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop