Next Article in Journal
QUICK: Quality and Usability Investigation and Control Kit for Mass Spectrometric Data from Detection of Persistent Organic Pollutants
Next Article in Special Issue
How Much Is Too Much? The Influence of Work Hours on Social Development: An Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Authentic Leadership and Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: A Multilevel Investigation in Three Countries
Open AccessArticle

Building a Sustainable Construction Workforce

School of Nursing and Health Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 2005, USA
CPWR–Center for Construction Research and Training, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(21), 4202;
Received: 16 September 2019 / Revised: 24 October 2019 / Accepted: 29 October 2019 / Published: 30 October 2019
The average U.S. construction worker is aged 42.6 years, and will not be eligible for full Social Security retirement benefits until age 67. Delayed retirement is largely driven by economic need, but construction workers face considerable challenges in remaining on the job. This study explores trade-specific age trends within the construction industry, and the experiences of building trade unions with aging membership. A mixed-methods approach used trade-specific age statistics from the Current Population Survey and key informant interviews with labor leaders, in order to identify union experiences and interventions. Mean and median ages for all subgroups in construction increased from 2003 to 2017. Immigrant construction workers were significantly younger than workers who were born in the U.S. (41 vs. 43, p < 0.001). Union workers were older than non-union workers (42 vs. 39 in 2017, p < 0.001); the age differential between self-employed and wage-and-salary workers was wide (49 vs. 40, p < 0.001). Union leaders described barriers, such as age discrimination and the loss of previously available light tasks, as well as current and potential solutions through union contract language requiring the inclusion of older workers, or establishing limits for lifting. Other solutions included career pathways for training and safety, with their attendant limitations; mentoring/pairing opportunities with apprentices; and the potential opportunities and training needs for site management positions. View Full-Text
Keywords: aging workforce; older workers; construction workers; labor unions; union interventions; sustainable workforce; work accommodations; career pathways aging workforce; older workers; construction workers; labor unions; union interventions; sustainable workforce; work accommodations; career pathways
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sokas, R.K.; Dong, X.S.; Cain, C.T. Building a Sustainable Construction Workforce. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4202.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop