European Rural Development Policy Approaching Health Issues: An Exploration of Programming Schemes
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. European Agricultural and Rural Policy Evolution
1.2. The Link between Agriculture, Food, Nutrition, and Health in the Literature
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Programming Issues within Single Nexus Dimension
3.1.1. Health
3.1.2. Nutrition
3.1.3. Food
3.2. Countries’ Focus and Priority Evolution Over Time
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Macro-Categories | Categories | Words |
---|---|---|
DISEASE | ||
DISABILITY | disable*, disabil* | |
DISEASE | diseas*, illness* | |
SINGLE DISEASES | Malaria*, HIV, diabetes, cardiovascular, cancer*, NCDs, chronic, deficiency | |
MORTALITY | mortal*, death*, deadly | |
HEALTH | ||
HEALTH | healthy, healthier, healthful, health | |
UNHEALTH | Unhealthy* | |
MEDICAL | ||
HEALTHCARE | medical*, healthcare* | |
PHARMACEUTIC | pharmaceutic*, medicin*, drug* | |
SAFETY | ||
BACTERIA | Bacteri* | |
EPIDEMIOLOGY | epidemiological*, epidemic* | |
HYGIENE | hygiene* | |
INFECTION | Infectious, infection, infecti* | |
PATHOGENS | Pathogen* | |
PREVENTION | prevention* | |
RISK | risk* | |
SAFETY | safet* | |
TOXIC | tox* |
Macro-Categories | Categories | Words |
---|---|---|
DIETARY | ||
DIET | Diets, dietetic, dietary, diet | |
EAT | eat* | |
INDIVIDUAL_METABOLIC | Metabolic, intake, digestion | |
NUTRIENTS | ||
FAT | fat*, lipid* | |
FIBER | fiber* | |
IRON | iron* | |
MICRO_MACRONUTRIENT | micronutrient*, macronutrient* | |
NUTRIENT | nutrient* | |
PROTEIN | protein* | |
AMINO | amino* | |
CALCIUM | calcium* | |
CARBOHYDRATE | carbohydrat* | |
OMEGA | omega* | |
SODIUM | sodium* | |
VITAMIN | vitamin* | |
NUTRITION | ||
MALNUTRITION | malnutrit*, malnourish* | |
NUTRITION | Nutritious, nutritionists, nutritional nutrit* | |
OBESITY | obes*, overweight*, overnutrit* |
Macro-Categories | Categories | Words |
---|---|---|
FOOD | ||
FOOD | food* | |
ATTRIBUTES | transgenic*, traceability, seasonal, novel, label*, convenience, affordability | |
MEALS | snack*, meal*, breakfast*, lunch* | |
ORGANIC | organic* (see Notes) | |
FOOD CONSUMER | ||
CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR | purchas*, perception*, motivation*, lifestyle*, cognitive*, behavior*, awareness*, attitude* (see Notes) | |
CONSUMPTION | consum* | |
MARKETING | promotion*, advertising, marketing | |
FOOD SECURITY | ||
FOOD SECURITY | “food security” (see Notes) | |
FOOD CHAIN | ||
MARKET CHANNEL | vending*, store*, retail* | |
FOOD CHAIN | chain*, intersectoral* |
Appendix B
Country | 2007–2013 | 2014–2020 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
National | Regional | Total | National | Regional | Total | |
AUSTRIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
BULGARIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
CEZCTH REPUBLIC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
CROATIA | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||
CYPRUS | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
DENMARK | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
ESTONIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
FINLAND | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
FRANCE | 6 | 6 | 3 | 27 | 30 | |
GERMANY | 1 | 14 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 15 |
GREECE | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
HUNGARY | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
IRELAND | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
ITALY | 1 | 21 | 22 | 2 | 20 | 22 |
LATVIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
LITHUANIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
LUXEMBOURG | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
MALTA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
POLAND | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
PORTUGAL | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
ROMANIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
SLOVAKIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
SLOVENIA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
SPAIN | 1 | 17 | 18 | 2 | 17 | 19 |
SWEEDEN | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
THE NETHERLANDS | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
UNITED KINGDOM | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||
Total | 23 | 69 | 92 | 29 | 89 | 118 |
Appendix C
Macroc. | Category | Freq. Categ. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
HEALTH | Health | 9037 | health | animal | environ. | products | plants | agricult. | welfare | areas | services | improv. |
WP | 5.10 | 1.43 | 1.21 | 1.07 | 0.83 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.58 | ||
Unhealthy | 12 | unhealthy | energy | areas | health | product | quality | food | industr. | natural | potentially | |
WP | 4.92 | 2.05 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.23 | ||
SAFETY | Safety | 3489 | safety | product | food | improving | quality | working | animals | environ.lly | health | using |
WP | 5.37 | 2.14 | 2.10 | 1.30 | 1.15 | 1.04 | 1.02 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.84 | ||
Toxic | 479 | toxicity | product | using | plant | protect. | harmful | classif. | pesticides | toxicol. | substances | |
WP | 5.80 | 2.91 | 2.67 | 1.48 | 1.31 | 1.28 | 0.92 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.63 | ||
Risk | 36483 | risk | measuring | implements | controls | manag. | types | operators | areas | agricult. | relativ. | |
WP | 6.21 | 2.81 | 1.36 | 1.11 | 1.07 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.69 | ||
Prevention | 3172 | prevents | forests | fires | disaster | nature | manag. | damage | risk | measuring | areas | |
WP | 5.32 | 2.79 | 2.08 | 1.68 | 1.61 | 1.60 | 1.46 | 1.34 | 1.24 | 0.98 | ||
Pathogens | 287 | pathogens | plants | forest | prevent. | pests | climate | protect. | product | damage | increase | |
WP | 5.37 | 1.40 | 1.35 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.61 | ||
Infection | 132 | infection | disease | animal | infectious | use | control | prevent | products | spread | causes | |
WP | 4.27 | 2.37 | 2.15 | 1.35 | 1.06 | 1.02 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.62 | ||
Hygiene | 1423 | hygiene | animal | improving | welfare | products | safety | standards | environ. | conditions | environ.al | |
WP | 5.09 | 3.00 | 2.47 | 2.20 | 1.76 | 1.24 | 1.20 | 1.17 | 1.12 | 1.10 | ||
Epidemiology | 73 | epidemics | diseases | production | risk | epidem. | health | plants | control | systems | organism | |
WP | 3.69 | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.56 | 1.42 | 1.14 | 1.07 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.78 | ||
Bacteria | 133 | bacteria | waters | plants | diseases | fungi | bacteriological | pollut. | organisms | products | cause | |
WP | 3.28 | 1.09 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.56 | ||
DISEASES | Disease | 3509 | diseases | pests | plants | organizations | scient. | prevent. | disasters | animals | forest | case |
WP | 5.52 | 2.25 | 1.71 | 1.49 | 1.40 | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.13 | 1.09 | 0.92 | ||
Single Diseases | 71 | cancer | diseases | agent | communicable | prevention | pino | oaks | products | agricult. | farms | |
WP | 2.86 | 2.28 | 2.08 | 1.76 | 1.17 | 1.04 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.65 | ||
Disability | 1631 | disabled | persons | rights | people | nations | implementing | convent. | applicat. | funds | policy | |
WP | 6.50 | 2.46 | 1.79 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.30 | 1.28 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.76 | ||
Mortality | 439 | death | mortality | rate | births | animals | plants | years | areas | cause | populations | |
WP | 3.08 | 2.08 | 1.51 | 1.21 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.56 | ||
MEDICAL | Pharmaceutical | 789 | medicinal | plants | products | aromatic | crops | using | fruit | veterinary | vegetables | animal |
WP | 3.80 | 2.81 | 2.43 | 1.37 | 1.21 | 1.03 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.79 | ||
Healthcare | 398 | medical | services | areas | care | rural | healthcare | health | animals | development | region | |
WP | 4.10 | 1.74 | 1.09 | 1.06 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.61 | ||
Macroc. | Category | Freq. Categ. | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
HEALTH | Health | 9037 | protect. | develops | measur. | check | rural | quality | using | manag. | food | farms |
WP | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.42 | ||
Unhealthy | 12 | problems | risk | supply | water | action | activities | agri | annoy | aspects | cereals | |
WP | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | ||
SAFETY | Safety | 3489 | agricult. | requirem. | protect. | conditions | standards | welfare | manag. | investm. | relative | equipment |
WP | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.52 | ||
Toxic | 479 | agricult. | environ. | chemicals | soil | active | relating | also | organisms | levels | treatment | |
WP | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.42 | ||
Risk | 36483 | forests | applicat. | actions | nations | products | assessments | prevents | verifying | mitigation | system | |
WP | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.32 | ||
Prevention | 3172 | events | catastroph. | soils | caused | agricult. | restoration | supports | protective | improving | action | |
WP | 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.69 | ||
Pathogens | 287 | spread | organis. | use | health | insects | risk | species | caused | crops | change | |
WP | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.49 | ||
Infection | 132 | fungal | mechanic | source | measures | reduce | plant | conditions | damage | parasitic | pests | |
WP | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.44 | ||
Hygiene | 1423 | health | investments | quality | food | requires | farms | protection | agricult. | livestock | working | |
WP | 1.09 | 1.04 | 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.55 | ||
Epidemiology | 73 | animal | climate | prevention | water | development | increased | monitoring | studies | agricult. | farms | |
WP | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.50 | ||
Bacteria | 133 | soil | contamination | insects | management | area | bacterium | control | protective | quercus | defoliants | |
WP | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.42 | ||
DISEASES | Disease | 3509 | including | control | nature | harmfulness | events | supported | description | environ.al | evidence | recommendation |
WP | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.69 | ||
Single Diseases | 71 | improve | colorful | health | bark | processionaria | spread | castagno | ceratocystis | cinipide | cochineal | |
WP | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.46 | ||
Disability | 1631 | accession | programs | represents | equality | field | units | areas | accordance | discrimination | decision | |
WP | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.52 | ||
Mortality | 439 | natural | increase | protection | case | growth | agricult. | species | trees | rural | using | |
WP | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.38 | ||
MEDICAL | Pharmaceutical | 789 | agricult. | food | drugs | herbs | areas | industry | protection | cultivation | farms | support |
WP | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.39 | ||
Healthcare | 398 | social | infrastructure | public | community | supply | educational | school | populations | access | production | |
WP | 0.58 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
Macroc. | Category | Freq. Categ. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
NUTRITION | Obesity | 6 | obesity | territory | health | overweight | fact | plan | rdp | region | rural | |
WP | 3.54 | 3.54 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.77 | 1.77 | |||
Malnutrition | 4 | freedom | free | malnutrition | animal | diseases | hunger | |||||
WP | 5.81 | 4.65 | 4.65 | 3.49 | 3.49 | 2.33 | ||||||
Nutrition | 590 | nutritive | products | agricultural | quality | animal | food | health | using | crop | development | |
WP | 4.86 | 2.20 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.57 | ||
DIETARY | Individual_metabolic | 343 | intake | digestion | water | anaerobic | products | organic | use | plants | agricultural | nitrogen |
WP | 3.50 | 1.61 | 1.03 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.65 | ||
Eating | 145 | eats | products | animals | protection | plant | drinking | use | birds | areas | hands | |
WP | 4.05 | 1.56 | 1.03 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.70 | ||
Diet | 244 | diets | products | cow | food | quality | health | dietary | costs | average | agricultural | |
WP | 4.31 | 2.41 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 0.75 | 0.43 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.56 | ||
NUTRIENTS | Micro_macronutr. | 35 | macronutrients | nitrogen | fertilizers | change | gross | soil | load | phosphorus | micronutrients | water |
WP | 3.63 | 2.51 | 2.37 | 2.23 | 2.23 | 1.96 | 1.68 | 1.54 | 1.26 | 1.26 | ||
Nutrient | 3173 | nutrients | waters | soil | reducing | balances | agricultural | areas | fertilizing | management | plants | |
WP | 5.38 | 2.00 | 1.75 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.70 | ||
Iron | 103 | iron | island | rural | wood | activities | nitrate | water | wire | embroidery | lough | |
WP | 4.56 | 0.89 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.43 | ||
Fat | 731 | fat | animal | product | pigs | breeds | cattle | farms | oils | milk | area | |
WP | 3.55 | 1.34 | 1.16 | 1.13 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.50 | ||
Vitamin | 9 | vitamins | substances | minerals | food | high | antioxidants | feed | nutritional | acid | animal | |
WP | 5.39 | 3.59 | 2.99 | 2.40 | 2.40 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.20 | 1.20 | ||
Sodium | 15 | sodium | areas | high | soil | development | nitrate | vertisol | agricultural | alkalizing | calcium | |
WP | 4.88 | 2.44 | 2.44 | 1.83 | 1.52 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.91 | ||
Protein | 538 | proteins | crops | products | cereals | animals | oilseeds | farms | feed | plants | legumes | |
WP | 5.27 | 4.00 | 1.70 | 1.38 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.65 | ||
Omega | 7 | omega | source | products | agriculture | emissions | milk | acids | cheese | dairy | equivalent | |
WP | 5.03 | 3.02 | 2.51 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.51 | ||
Amino | 4 | protein | aminoacids | substitutes | birds | constant | ensure | fish | meal | plant | prunelli | |
WP | 5.16 | 3.23 | 3.23 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.94 | 1.94 | ||
Calcium | 60 | calcium | nitrate | soil | potassium | magnesium | fertilizers | plant | organic | irrigation | carbonates | |
WP | 4.68 | 2.05 | 1.98 | 1.32 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.02 | 0.80 | 0.66 | ||
Fiber | 505 | fibers | optical | infrastructures | network | areas | connectivity | broadband | region | plants | prescription | |
WP | 5.24 | 2.76 | 1.68 | 1.54 | 1.10 | 1.04 | 0.86 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.60 | ||
Carbohydrate | 10 | carbohydrates | plant | reserves | increase | product | sugar | accelerate | altering | balance | center | |
WP | 5.78 | 2.89 | 2.31 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | ||
Macroc. | Category | Freq. Categ. | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
NUTRITION | Obesity | 6 | ||||||||||
WP | ||||||||||||
Malnutrition | 4 | |||||||||||
WP | ||||||||||||
Nutrition | 590 | needs | promotion | areas | fertilizing | improving | soil | increase | values | measures | costs | |
WP | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 48 | ||
DIETARY | Individual_metabolic | 343 | manure | energy | areas | including | soil | fertilizers | year | animal | reduced | management |
WP | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.43 | ||
Eating | 145 | food | quality | requiring | species | development | new | activity | ensure | habits | livestock | |
WP | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.47 | ||
Diet | 244 | animals | breeds | farms’ | market | yield | aid | increase | mediterranean | including | dairy | |
WP | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.37 | ||
NUTRIENTS | Micro_macronutr. | 35 | indicator | use | balance | impact | needs | areas | natural | surface | unit | value |
WP | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.84 | ||
Nutrient | 3173 | improvement | nitrogen | products | quality | crops | organisms | farms | lands | protects | measures | |
WP | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.52 | ||
Iron | 103 | area | development | products | traditional | craft | palma | systems | wine | interventions | level | |
WP | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.30 | ||
Fat | 731 | dairy | vegetal | meat | cows | poultry | agricultural | food | livestock | sectors | processing | |
WP | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.26 | ||
Vitamin | 9 | biological | content | conventional | favorable | harmful | organic | origin | products | quality | quantity | |
WP | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.20 | ||
Sodium | 15 | limit | measures | neutral | properties | acquisition | associated | based | biodiversity | change | chemical | |
WP | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.61 | ||
Protein | 538 | grain | use | agricultural | areas | food | sector | cultivation | vegetables | oil | wheat | |
WP | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.44 | ||
Omega | 7 | forestry | calcium | functional | health | higher | improvements | industries | lactose | oil | value | |
WP | 1.51 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | ||
Amino | 4 | tavignano | aminotriazole | ampa | animal | diet | glyphosate | optimum | quality | use | aims | |
WP | 1.94 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.65 | ||
Calcium | 60 | fertilisers | phosphate | remove | gums | nutrient | preparations | acid | agrotextil | ammonium | mineral | |
WP | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.44 | ||
Fiber | 505 | operators | rural | services | access | technology | industrial | use | development | number | territory | |
WP | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.43 | ||
Carbohydrate | 10 | crops | decreasing | degradation | elements | evergreen | fungus | intake | internal | matter | methane | |
WP | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.16 |
Macroc. | Category | Freq. Categ. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOOD | Food | 31855 | food | agricultures | products | sectors | forestry | quality | developm. | industry | process. | promot. |
WP | 5.05 | 3.95 | 2.96 | 1.32 | 1.20 | 1.08 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.80 | 0.74 | ||
Attributes | 4281 | products | labels | traceability | quality | organized | systems | regulat. | agricultur. | using | seasonal | |
WP | 3.63 | 2.74 | 1.49 | 1.4 | 1.01 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.7 | ||
Meal | 253 | meals | costs | accommodation | expenses | products | breakfast | expenditure | travel | replacement | bed | |
WP | 3.45 | 2.01 | 1.17 | 1.13 | 1 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.71 | ||
Organic | 826 | products | organic | foods | agricultural | farms | regulations | quality | market | developm. | council | |
WP | 6.22 | 6.18 | 5.07 | 2.85 | 1.63 | 1.19 | 1.17 | 0.79 | 0.68 | 0.59 | ||
CONSUMPTION | Consumer behav. | 496 | consumers | products | purchase | awareness | quality | increase | agricultural | equipment | promotion | market |
WP | 5.32 | 3.28 | 3.16 | 1.73 | 1.53 | 1.47 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.73 | ||
Consumption | 10929 | consumption | products | energy | agriculture | waters | quality | increase | markets | foods | using | |
WP | 5.17 | 3.07 | 1.52 | 1.15 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.56 | ||
Marketing | 3889 | agriculture | foods | products | promotions | markets | organizations | chain | processing | quality | managers | |
WP | 6.26 | 4.93 | 4.56 | 3.93 | 3.92 | 2.47 | 2.22 | 2.18 | 1.97 | 1.61 | ||
FOOD SECUR. | Food security | 307 | food | security | products | quality | improving | agriculture | environmental | health | systems | animal |
WP | 6.19 | 5.14 | 2.29 | 1.52 | 1.15 | 1.14 | 0.9 | 0.85 | 0.69 | 0.67 | ||
FOOD CHAIN | Chain | 9899 | chains | products | food | agriculture | supply | markets | promotional | development | local | processing |
WP | 5.34 | 3.67 | 1.99 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.73 | 1.46 | 1.07 | 1.03 | 1.02 | ||
Market channel | 1979 | storing | retail | products | markets | foods | agricultural | services | carbon | using | sales | |
WP | 2.92 | 2.23 | 1.71 | 1.16 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.51 | ||
Macroc. | Category | Freq. Categ. | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
FOOD | Food | 31855 | markets | areas | rural | chains | improving | support | measuring | value | managing | schemes |
WP | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.45 | ||
Attributes | 4281 | protection | market | controls | food | indicators | council | measuring | improvem. | process | develops | |
WP | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.44 | ||
Meal | 253 | farms | food | including | services | lunch | units | relating | used | accordance | dinner | |
WP | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.46 | ||
Organic | 826 | increase | areas | processing | measures | industry | schemes | sector | promotion | indicators | demand | |
WP | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.37 | ||
CONSUMPTION | Consumer behav. | 496 | food | information | costs | activity | materials | use | environmental | energy | improve | change |
WP | 0.70 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.46 | ||
Consumption | 10929 | developments | areas | investments | regional | measuring | sectors | reducing | improve | promotional | systems | |
WP | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.4 | 0.39 | 0.38 | ||
Marketing | 3889 | including | animal | risk | sector | producers | welfare | local | schemes | value | support | |
WP | 1.58 | 1.47 | 1.39 | 1.37 | 1.36 | 1.33 | 1.13 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 0.75 | ||
FOOD SECUR. | Food security | 307 | safety | marketing | investments | disease | environment | promote | developm. | processing | traceability | well |
WP | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.48 | ||
FOOD CHAIN | Chain | 9899 | value | integrators | quality | improving | short | organized | management | projects | sectors | competitiv. |
WP | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.9 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.7 | 0.63 | 0.57 | 0.57 | ||
Market channel | 1979 | areas | processing | trading | developments | systems | management | sector | rural | waters | protection | |
WP | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.4 | 0.39 | 0.38 |
Appendix D
HEALTH_DISEASE\Disability | HEALTH_DISEASE\Disease | HEALTH_DISEASE\Mortality | HEALTH_DISEASE\Single_Diseases | HEALTH_HEALTH\Health | HEALTH_HEALTH\Unhealth | HEALTH_MEDICAL\Medical_Healthcare | HEALTH_MEDICAL\Pharmaceutic | HEALTH_SAFETY\Bacteria | HEALTH_SAFETY\Epidemiological | HEALTH_SAFETY\Hygiene | HEALTH_SAFETY\Infection | HEALTH_SAFETY\Pathogens | HEALTH_SAFETY\Prevention | HEALTH_SAFETY\Risk | HEALTH_SAFETY\Safety | HEALTH_SAFETY\Tox | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEALTH_DISEASE\Disability | 1631 | 16 | 12 | 0 | 68 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 | 4 | 0 |
HEALTH_DISEASE\Disease | 1.0% | 3509 | 40 | 32 | 409 | 0 | 5 | 31 | 27 | 22 | 44 | 65 | 48 | 893 | 619 | 50 | 7 |
HEALTH_DISEASE\Mortality | 0.7% | 1.1% | 439 | 8 | 31 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 21 | 5 | 2 |
HEALTH_DISEASE\Single_Diseases | 0.0% | 0.9% | 1.8% | 71 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
HEALTH_HEALTH\Health | 4.2% | 11.7% | 7.1% | 14.1% | 9037 | 4 | 156 | 55 | 7 | 24 | 331 | 21 | 50 | 292 | 804 | 684 | 55 |
HEALTH_HEALTH\Unhealth | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
HEALTH_MEDICAL\Medical_Healthcare | 0.6% | 0.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 398 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 0 |
HEALTH_MEDICAL\Pharmaceutic | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.5% | 4.2% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 3.5% | 789 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 13 | 25 | 12 | 5 |
HEALTH_SAFETY\Bacteria | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 4.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 133 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 1 |
HEALTH_SAFETY\Epidemiological | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 73 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 25 | 3 | 0 |
HEALTH_SAFETY\Hygiene | 0.0% | 1.3% | 0.5% | 2.8% | 3.7% | 8.3% | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1423 | 4 | 3 | 29 | 36 | 366 | 2 |
HEALTH_SAFETY\Infection | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 5.6% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.7% | 0.3% | 132 | 5 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 |
HEALTH_SAFETY\Pathogens | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 3.8% | 2.7% | 0.2% | 3.8% | 287 | 49 | 54 | 6 | 3 |
HEALTH_SAFETY\Prevention | 0.9% | 25.4% | 1.6% | 22.5% | 3.2% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 6.8% | 9.6% | 2.0% | 9.1% | 17.1% | 8958 | 3172 | 91 | 2 |
HEALTH_SAFETY\Risk | 1.0% | 17.6% | 4.8% | 7.0% | 8.9% | 33.3% | 2.5% | 3.2% | 7.5% | 34.2% | 2.5% | 7.6% | 18.8% | 35.4% | 36483 | 154 | 44 |
HEALTH_SAFETY\Safety | 0.2% | 1.4% | 1.1% | 0.0% | 7.6% | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.3% | 4.1% | 25.7% | 1.5% | 2.1% | 1.0% | 0.4% | 3489 | 5 |
HEALTH_SAFETY\Tox | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 479 |
DIET | EAT | INDIVIDUAL_METABOLIC | AMINO | CALCIUM | CARBOHYDRATE | FAT | FIBER | IRON | MICRO_MACRONUTRIENT | NUTRIENT | OMEGA | PROTEIN | SODIUM | VITAMIN | MALNUTRITION | NUTRITION | OBESITY | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIET | 244 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 |
EAT | 0.8% | 145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
INDIVIDUAL_METABOLIC | 1.2% | 0.0% | 343 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
AMINO | 0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CALCIUM | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
CARBOHYDRATE | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FAT | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.0% | 731 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
FIBER | 2.9% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 505 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
IRON | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 103 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MICRO_MACRONUTRIENT | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 35 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
NUTRIENT | 0.4% | 1.4% | 4.4% | 0.0% | 18.3% | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 1.0% | 11.4% | 3173 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 0 |
OMEGA | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.3% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PROTEIN | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 10.0% | 3.3% | 1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 538 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
SODIUM | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
VITAMIN | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 14.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
MALNUTRITION | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 |
NUTRITION | 2.9% | 4.8% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 1.7% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 2.9% | 1.8% | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 590 | 1 |
OBESITY | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 6 |
ATTRIBUTES | CHAIN | CHANNEL | CONSUMER | CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR | FOOD | FOOD MARKETING | FOOD SECURITY | MEALS | ORGANIC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATTRIBUTES | 4281 | 243 | 43 | 308 | 25 | 663 | 70 | 40 | 6 | 79 |
CHAIN | 5.7% | 9899 | 174 | 710 | 35 | 4374 | 1922 | 22 | 6 | 50 |
CHANNEL | 1.0% | 1.8% | 1979 | 135 | 16 | 326 | 38 | 2 | 3 | 21 |
CONSUMER | 7.2% | 7.2% | 6.8% | 10,929 | 517 | 2105 | 170 | 40 | 17 | 112 |
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 4.7% | 496 | 137 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
FOOD | 15.5% | 44.2% | 16.5% | 19.3% | 27.6% | 31,855 | 4161 | 314 | 40 | 864 |
FOOD MARKETING | 1.6% | 19.4% | 1.9% | 1.6% | 4.0% | 13.1% | 3889 | 31 | 2 | 61 |
FOOD SECURITY | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.8% | 307 | 0 | 2 |
MEALS | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 253 | 0 |
ORGANIC | 1.8% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 1.6% | 2.7% | 1.6% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 826 |
References
- World Health Organization. WHO—Regional Office for Europe European Food and Nutrition Action Plan 2015–2020; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; p. 31. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/294474/European-Food-Nutrition-Action-Plan-20152020-en.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2017).
- IFPRI. International Food Policy Research Institute 2017 Global Food Policy Report; IFPRI: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; p. 148. Available online: https://doi.org.10.2499/9780896292529 (accessed on 3 August 2019).
- Townsend, R.F.; Jaffee, S.; Hoberg, Y.T.; Htenas, A. Future of Food—Shaping the Global Food System to Deliver Improved Nutrition and Health; World Bank Group: Washington, DC USA, 2016; p. 36. [Google Scholar]
- Uccello, E.; Kauffmann, D.; Calo, M.; Streissel, M. Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture and Food Systems in Practice. Options for Intervention; FAO: Roma, Italy, 2017; ISBN 978-92-109696-3. [Google Scholar]
- FAO; WHO. Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Secretariat on the Conference. Second International Conference on Nutrition; FAO: Roma, Italy; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (accessed on 12 May 2016).
- Eme, P.E.; Douwes, J.; Kim, N.; Foliaki, S.; Burlingame, B. Review of Methodologies for Assessing Sustainable Diets and Potential for Development of Harmonised Indicators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Parliament Financing of the CAP. Fact Sheets on the European Union, 2018. Available online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/106/financing-of-the-cap (accessed on 15 April 2019).
- European Commission CAP post-2013: Graphs and figures, 2017. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/graphs-figures/cap_en (accessed on 17 May 2017).
- Bailey, A.P.; Lang, T.; Schoen, V. Does the CAP still fit? Food Res. Collab. Policy Br. 2016, 1–23. Available online: http://www.foodresearch.org.uk (accessed on 18 July 2018).
- Walls, H.L.; Cornelsen, L.; Lock, K.; Smith, R.D. How much priority is given to nutrition and health in the EU Common Agricultural Policy? Food Policy 2016, 59, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mazzocchi, M.; Cagnone, S.; Bech-Larsen, T.; Niedźwiedzka, B.; Saba, A.; Shankar, B.; Verbeke, W.; Traill, W.B. What is the public appetite for healthy eating policies? Evidence from a cross-European survey. Health. Econ. Policy Law 2015, 10, 267–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- European Parliament Second Pillar of the CAP: Rural Development Policy. Fact Sheets on the European Union. 2018. Available online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/110/second-pillar-of-the-cap-rural-development-policy (accessed on 15 April 2019).
- Cooper, T.; Hart, K.; Baldock, D. Provision of Public Goods through Agriculture in the European Union; Intitute for European Environmental Policy: London, UK, 2009; p. 351. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/external-studies/2009/public-goods/report_en.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2017).
- Oliver, M.A.; Gregory, P.J. Soil, food security and human health: A review. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2015, 66, 257–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Recanati, F.; Maughan, C.; Pedrotti, M.; Dembska, K.; Antonelli, M. Assessing the role of CAP for more sustainable and healthier food systems in Europe: A literature review. Scitotenv 2019, 653, 908–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Birt, C.A. Food and agriculture policy in Europe. AIMS Public Health 2016, 3, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Sa, J.; Lock, K. Will European agricultural policy for school fruit and vegetables improve public health? A review of school fruit and vegetable programmes. Eur. J. Public Health 2008, 18, 558–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- European Commission. Overview of CAP Reform 2014–2020. Agricultural Policy Perspectives Brief; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2013; Volume 5, Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/policy-perspectives/policy-briefs/05 (accessed on 15 February 2015).
- European Commission. The History of the CAP. 2016. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cap-history/index_en.htm (accessed on 2 April 2017).
- European Commission. The Common Agricultural Policy. A Story to Be Continued; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2012; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- European Parliament. CAP Instruments and Reforms Made to Them. European Union Fact Sheets; European Parliament: Brussels, Belgium, 2017; pp. 1–5. Available online: https://www.recap-h2020.eu/cap-instruments-factsheet/ (accessed on 17 May 2017).
- European Union. Treaty of Rome, Original version 1957. Available online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/it/in-the-past/the-parliament-and-the-treaties/treaty-of-rome (accessed on 15 April 2019).
- Birt, C. A CAP on Health? The Impact of the EU Common Agricultural Policy on Public Health; Faculty of Public Health Report 2007; Faculty of Public Health: London, UK, 2007; pp. 1–29. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_overview/health_forum/docs/ev_20070601_rd05_en.pdf (accessed on 9 May 2010).
- European Commission. Eu Rural Development Policy 2007–2013. Fact Sheet, European Communities; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2008; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. The Future of Food and Farming. 2017. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/future-of-cap/future_of_food_and_farming_communication_en.pdf (accessed on 29 July 2019).
- European Union. Cork 2.0 Declaration—A Better Life in Rural Areas. 2016. Available online: https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/cork-declaration_en.pdf ISBN 978-92-79-63526-7 doi:10.2762/618522 (accessed on 30 July 2019).
- Gillespie, S.; van den Bold, M. Agriculture, Food Systems, and Nutrition: Meeting the Challenge. Glob. Chall. 2017, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition Double Pyramid 2016. Available online: http://www.barillacfn.com (accessed on 25 November 2017).
- Lancet Commission. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 2019, 393, 447–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phulkerd, S.; Lawrence, M.; Vandevijvere, S.; Sacks, G.; Worsley, A.; Tangcharoensathien, V. A review of methods and tools to assess the implementation of government policies to create healthy food environments for preventing obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases. Implement. Sci. 2016, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Vliet, N.; Staatsen, B.; Kruize, H.; Morris, G.; Costongs, C.; Bell, R.; Marques, S.; Taylor, T.; Quiroga, S.; Martinez Juarez, P.; et al. The INHERIT Model: A Tool to Jointly Improve Health, Environmental Sustainability and Health Equity through Behavior and Lifestyle Change. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swinburn, B.; Vandevijvere, S.; Kraak, V.; Sacks, G.; Snowdon, W.; Hawkes, C.; Barquera, S.; Friel, S.; Kelly, B.; Kumanyika, S.; et al. Monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments: A proposed government healthy food environment policy index. Obes. Rev. 2013, 14, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanter, R.; Walls, H.L.; Tak, M.; Roberts, F.; Waage, J. A conceptual framework for understanding the impacts of agriculture and food system policies on nutrition and health. Food Secur. 2015, 7, 767–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lang, T.; Barling, D. Nutrition and sustainability: An emerging food policy discourse. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2013, 72, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boncinelli, F.; Riccioli, F.; Marone, E. Do forests help to keep my body mass index low? Forpol 2015, 54, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sing, L.; Metzger, M.J.; Paterson, J.S.; Ray, D. A review of the effects of forest management intensity on ecosystem services for northern European temperate forests with a focus on the UK. Forestry 2018, 91, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghimire, R.; Ferreira, S.; Green, G.T.; Poudyal, N.C.; Cordell, H.K.; Thapa, J.R. Green space and adult obesity in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 136, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markevych, I.; Schoierer, J.; Hartig, T.; Chudnovsky, A.; Hystad, P.; Dzhambov, A.M.; de Vriesg, S.; Triguero-Mash, M.; Brauerk, M.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.; et al. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environ. Res. 2017, 158, 301–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPES-Food. Unravelling the Food–Health Nexus: Addressing Practices, Political Economy, and Power Relations to Build Healthier Food Systems. The Global Alliance for the Future of Food and IPES-Food, p. 120. Available online: http://www.ipes-food.org/_img/upload/files/Health_FullReport(1).pdf (accessed on 7 February 2018).
- World Bank. From Agriculture to Nutrition: Pathways, Synergies, and Outcomes; Report No. 40196-GLB; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; p. 106. [Google Scholar]
- Webb, P.; Kennedy, E. Impacts of agriculture on nutrition: Nature of the evidence and research gaps. Food Nutr. Bull. 2014, 35, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, B.; Amoroso, L. FAO’s Approach to Nutrition-Sensitive Agricultural Development. 2011. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-at543e.pdf (accessed on 14 June 2017).
- Hawkes, C.; Friel, S.; Lobstein, T.; Lang, T. Linking agricultural policies with obesity and noncommunicable diseases: A new perspective for a globalising world. Food Policy 2012, 37, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCarthy, M.; Cluzel, E.; Dressel, K.; Newton, R. Food and health research in Europe: Structures, Gaps and Futures. Food Policy 2013, 39, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waltner-Toews, D.; Lang, T. A New Conceptual Base for Food and Agricultural Policy: The Emerging Model of Links between Agriculture, Food, Health, Environment and Society. Glob. Chang. Hum. Health. 2000, 1, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaenicke, H.; Virchow, D. Entry points into a nutrition-sensitive agriculture. Food Secur. 2013, 5, 679–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinstrup-Andersen, P. Nutrition-sensitive food systems: From rhetoric to action. Lancet 2013, 382, 375–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Public Health Alliance. A CAP for Healthy Living. 2016. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/future-of-cap/foc-fb-ha_en.pdf (accessed on 29 July 2019).
- Fresco, L.O.; Poppe, K.J. Towards a Common Agricultural and Food Policy; Wageningen University and Research: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2016; p. 62. Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/390280 (accessed on 31 May 2017).
- Jones, A.D.; Ejeta, G. A new global agenda for nutrition and health: The importance of agriculture and food systems. Bull. World Health. Organ. 2016, 94, 228–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buckwell, A.; Matthews, A.; Baldock, D.; Mathijs, E. CAP: Thinking Out of the Box, 2017. Available online: http://www.risefoundation.eu/projects/cap-thinking-outside-the-box (accessed on 30 July 2019).
- Thilsted, S.H.; Thorne-Lyman, A.; Webb, P.; Bogard, J.R.; Subasinghe, R.; Phillips, M.J.; Allison, E.H. Sustaining healthy diets: The role of capture fisheries and aquaculture for improving nutrition in the post-2015 era. Food Policy 2016, 61, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Love, D.; Pinto da Silva, P.; Fry, J.; Clay, P. Fisheries, Food, and Health in the United States: The Importance of Aligning Fisheries and Health Policies. Agric. Food Secur. 2017, 6, 16. Available online: https://agricultureandfoodsecurity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40066-017-0093-9 (accessed on 14 June 2017). [CrossRef]
- Block, L.G.; Grier, S.A.; Childers, T.L.; Davis, B.; Ebert, J.E.J.; Kumanyika, S.; Laczniak, R.N.; Machin, J.E.; Motley, C.M.; Peracchio, L.; et al. From Nutrients to Nurturance: A Conceptual Introduction to Food Well-Being. J. Public Policy Mark. 2011, 30, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fan, S. Comment on “Agricultural (Dis)Incentives and Food Security: Is there a Link?”. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2017, 99, 872–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wissenschaftlicher Beirat für Agrarpolitik, Ernährung und gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz beim BMEL. Für eine gemeinwohlorientierte Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik der EU nach 2020: Grundsatzfragen und Empfehlungen. Stellungnahme (For a Common Good Agricultural Policy of the EU beyond 2020: Policy issues and recommendations.); Wissenschaftlichen Beirats für Agrarpolitik, Ernährung und gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz (WBAE): Berlin, Germany, 2018; p. 105. Available online: https://buel.bmel.de/index.php/buel/article/view/208/WBAE-gemeinwohlorientierte%20Gemeinsame%20Agrarpolitik (accessed on 10 February 2018).
- Thow, A.M.; Verma, G.; Soni, D. How can health, agriculture and economic policy actors work together to enhance the external food environment for fruit and vegetables? A qualitative policy analysis in India. Food Policy 2018, 77, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Downs, S.M.; Thow, A.M.; Ghosh-Jerath, S.; Leeder, S.R. Identifying the barriers and opportunities for enhanced coherence between agriculture and public health policies: Improving the fat supply in India. Ecol. Food Nutr. 2015, 54, 603–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thow, A.M.; Kadiyala, S.; Khandelwal, S.; Menon, P.; Downs, S.; Reddy, K.S. Towards food policy for the dual burden of malnutrition: An exploratory policy space analysis in India. Food Nutr. Bull. 2016, 37, 261–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walls, H.; Baker, P.; Parkhurst, J. Addressing trade policy as a macro-structural determinant of health: The role of institutions and ideas. Glob. Soc. Policy 2018, 18, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stewart, D.; Kennedy, A.; Pavel, A. Beyond nutrition and agriculture policy: Collaborating for a food policy. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 112, S65–S74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmadfa, I. (Ed.) European Nutrition and Health Report 2009. Forum of Nutrition; Karger: Basel, Switzerland, 2009; Volume 62, pp. 1–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawkes, C. Promoting healthy diets and tackling obesity and diet-related chronic diseases: What are the agricultural policy levers? Food Nutr. Bull. 2007, 28, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lock, K.; Gabrijelcic-Blenkus, M.; Martuzzi, M.; Otorepec, P.; Wallace, P.; Dora, C.; Robertson, A.; Zakotnic, J.M. Health impact assessment of agriculture and food policies: Lessons learnt from the Republic of Slovenia. Bull. World Health Organ. 2003, 81, 391–398. [Google Scholar]
- Lock, K.; Smith, R.D.; Dangour, A.D.; Keogh-Brown, M.; Pigatto, G.; Hawkes, C.; Fisberg, R.M.; Chalabi, Z. Health, agricultural, and economic effects of adoption of healthy diet recommendations. Lancet 2010, 376, 1699–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balz, A.G.; Heil, E.A.; Jordan, I. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture: New term or new concept? Agric. Food Secur. 2015, 4, 1–16. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40066-015-0026-4 (accessed on 12 March 2018). [CrossRef]
- IPES-Food. Towards a Common Food Policy for the European Union. The Policy Reform and Realignment That Is Required to Build Sustainable Food Systems in Europe, 2019. Available online: http://www.ipes-food.org/_img/upload/files/CFP_FullReport.pdf (accessed on 30 July 2019).
- European Associations (various). Letter to European Commission of 16/07/2019. Available online: https://www.env-health.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Open-Letter-to-the-EC-President-English.pdf (accessed on 29 July 2019).
- Shankar, B. The Influence of Agricultural, Trade and Food Policies on Diets. FAO Trade Policy Technical Notes, Trade and Food Security, No. 18 November 2017. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i8190e.pdf (accessed on 29 July 2019).
- Grimmer, J.; Stewart, B.M. Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Anal. 2013, 21, 267–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, R. Basic Content Analysis, 2nd ed.; Sage: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Storcksdieck, S.; Kardakis, T.; Wollgast, J.; Nelson, M.; Caldeira, S. Mapping of National School Food Policies across the EU28; JRC Science and Policy Reports; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2014; p. 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aiken, M.; Balan, S. An Analysis of Google Translate Accuracy. Transl. J. 2011, 16, 2. Available online: http://translationjournal.net/journal/56google.htm (accessed on 7 December 2018).
- AbuSa’aleek, A.O. The Adequacy and Acceptability of Machine Translation in Translating the Islamic Texts. Int. J. Engl. Linguist 2016, 6, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Acosta, S.; Barry, A.E. Evaluating the Accuracy of Google Translate for Diabetes Education Material. JMIR Diabetes 2016, 1, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chand, S. Empirical survey of machine translation tools. In Proceedings of the 2016 Second International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN), Kolkata, India, 23–25 September 2016; pp. 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, M.; Yamamoto, H.; Sumita, E.; Nakamura, S. On the Importance of Pivot Language Selection for Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Boulder, CO, USA, 31 May–5 June 2009; pp. 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, M.; Finch, A.; Sumita, E. How to Choose the Best Pivot Language for Automatic Translation of Low-Resource Languages. ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process. 2013, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucas, C.; Nielsen, R.A.; Roberts, M.E.; Stewart, B.M.; Storer, A.; Tingley, D. Computer-assisted text analysis for comparative politics. Polit. Anal. 2015, 23, 254–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khoong, E.C.; Steinbrook, E.; Brown, C.; Fernandez, A. Assessing the Use of Google Translate for Spanish and Chinese Translations of Emergency Department Discharge Instructions. JAMA Int. Med. 2019, 179, 580–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsieh, H.; Shannon, S. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 2005, 15, 1277–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rapport, F. Summative analysis: A qualitative method for social science and health research. Int. J. Qual. Methods 2010, 9, 270–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Samoggia, A.; Bertazzoli, A.; Ruggeri, A. European Rural Development Policy Approaching Health Issues: An Exploration of Programming Schemes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162973
Samoggia A, Bertazzoli A, Ruggeri A. European Rural Development Policy Approaching Health Issues: An Exploration of Programming Schemes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(16):2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162973
Chicago/Turabian StyleSamoggia, Antonella, Aldo Bertazzoli, and Arianna Ruggeri. 2019. "European Rural Development Policy Approaching Health Issues: An Exploration of Programming Schemes" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 16: 2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162973