Next Article in Journal
Fish and Meat Intake, Serum Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid Levels, and Mortality in Community-Dwelling Japanese Older Persons
Previous Article in Journal
Food Insecurity and Hunger in Rich Countries—It Is Time for Action against Inequality
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 16
Issue 10
10.3390/ijerph16101805
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of Pavement Types on Soil Bacterial Communities across Different Depths

by
Weiwei Yu
1,2,†,
Yinhong Hu
1,2,†,
Bowen Cui
1,2,
Yuanyuan Chen
3 and
Xiaoke Wang
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
2
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Co-first author.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(10), 1805; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101805
Submission received: 1 May 2019 / Revised: 16 May 2019 / Accepted: 19 May 2019 / Published: 21 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Science and Engineering)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pavements have remarkable effects on topsoil micro-organisms, but it remains unclear how subsoil microbial communities respond to pavements. In this study, ash trees (Fraxinus Chinensis) were planted on pervious pavement (PP), impervious pavement (IPP), and non-pavement (NP) plots. After five years, we determined the soil bacterial community composition and diversity by high-throughput sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The results of our field experiment reveal that the presence of pavement changed soil bacterial community composition and decreased the Shannon index, but had no impact on the Chao 1 at the 0–20 cm layer. However, we achieved the opposite result at a depth of 20–80 cm. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in bacterial community composition using the Shannon index and the Chao 1 at the 80–100 cm layer. Soil total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), available phosphorus (AP), NO3−-N, and available potassium (AK) were the main factors that influenced soil bacterial composition and diversity across different pavements. Soil bacterial composition and diversity had no notable difference between PP and IPPs at different soil layers. Our results strongly indicate that pavements have a greater impact on topsoil bacterial communities than do subsoils, and PPs did not provide a better habitat for micro-organisms when compared to IPPs in the short term.

1. Introduction

Impervious pavement (IPP) covered with artificial materials, such as concrete, asphalt, and bricks, is essential to shelter, transportation, and commerce in urban areas [1]. However, they have adverse effects on urban soils, such as compacting the soil [2], depleting carbon and nitrogen storage, and blocking soil-air gas exchange [3]. In addition, previous studies have shown that pavement altered bacterial community composition and decreased bacterial diversity at the topsoil layer [4,5]. However, the effects of pavement on bacterial communities with soil depth remain largely unknown.
Soil micro-organisms are critical for plant growth [6,7] and biogeochemical cycles [8], and there are significant changes in microbial communities with soil depth [9,10]. Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities decreased with depth in soil covered by vegetation [11] but increased along the depth gradient under IPP [5]. Moreover, the microbial community structure also shifts with depth, and microbial communities in deep soils were found to be relatively similar in several ecosystems [12,13]. Additionally, street trees in the urban landscape provide significant benefits, such as reducing stormwater runoff, improving air quality, and ameliorating the heat-island effect in urban areas [14,15]. Their roots, in general, are sealed by impervious surfaces that affect access to water, air, and nutrients, thus leading them to uptake water and nutrients from deep soil layers. Deep soils may contain microbial communities that are specialized for their environment, are fundamentally distinct from the surface communities [16,17], and form mutualistic relationships with plants [18]. Understanding the effects of pavements on soil microbial communities across different depths can provide a reference for plant growth in urban areas.
It is well-known that using pervious pavements (PPs) as an alternative to IPPs offers one solution to mitigate urban runoff and water pollution [19,20]. Permeable pavements are beneficial to microbial biomass and function diversity compared to impervious surfaces. Some research has suggested that the degree of soil sealing does not significantly affect soil microbial biomass and activity [21], and that PPs do not improve the root zone of mature trees [22]. Thus, it remains unclear whether PPs can provide a better habitat to microbial communities, as well as plants, compared to IPPs.
The objective of this study was to measure the effects of pavements on bacterial communities and to determine whether PPs have fewer negative effects on bacterial communities. We planted ash trees (Fraxinus Chinensis), which is a popular urban tree species, on paved (IPP and PP) and non-pavement plots and quantified soil bacterial relative abundance, diversity, and community composition by high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene five years later. This experiment addresses the following questions. First, how do bacterial communities respond to pavements across different depths (as deep as 100 cm below the soil surface)? Second, can PPs improve soil microbial habitats?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site Description and Design

The study site was in the Zhangtou village, Changping District, Beijing, China (40°12′N, 116°08′E). The mean annual temperature is 12.1 °C, average annual rainfall is 542 mm, and most of the precipitation occurs from June to September. The study land was cultivated for wheat and maize production for many years before the experiment. The soil texture at the test site was sandy loam.
We used a factorial split-plot experimental design to divide the study area into three equal zones for three pavement types: (1) impervious bricks pavement (i.e., IPP), (2) pervious bricks pavement (i.e., PP), and (3) non-pavement (i.e., the control and NP). In each zone, we used three blocks as replicates for planting ash trees (Fraxinus Chinensis) with a density of 2.0 m × 2.0 m. The land zones for treatments of PP and IPPs were paved on bricks with a size of 20 cm × 10 cm × 6 cm (length × width × height). The Beijing Yataiyuhong Technology Development Co., Ltd. produced the bricks from a mixture of clay, sand, and coal ash. The pervious capability of pervious bricks is more than 0.4 mm s−1. One-year-old ash tree (Fraxinus Chinensis) seedlings, which have a similar height (118.5 ± 2.4 cm) and diameter (14.8 ± 1.0 mm), were randomly planted in April 2012.

2.2. Soil Sampling

Soil samples were collected in October 2017 to determine the effects of pavement on soil microbial diversity and community composition. At each block, three replicate plots were selected. Five soil cores that were 1 meter apart from the ash tree were collected from each subplot (from a total of nine subplots) from five depth increments: 0–20, 20–40, 40–60, 60–80, and 80–100 cm. The five samples from the same subplot were combined to form a composite sample for each depth. Each sample was placed in a sterile plastic bag, sealed, and transported to the laboratory on ice. After removing the litter layer, roots, and stones, all samples (45 samples) were passed through a 2 mm sieve and then separated into two parts. One subsample was air-dried for analysis of physicochemical properties, and one was stored at −80 °C for DNA extraction.

2.3. Determination of Soil Properties

Soil pH was measured using a pH meter (FE20-FiveEasyTM pH, Mettler Toledo, Weilheim, Germany) with a 1:5 (wt/vol) ratio of soil to water following shaking for 30 min. Soil total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) were determined using the Dumas method by an Element Analyzer (Vario EL III, Elementar, Hanau, Germany). Soil organic carbon (SOC) content was determined by the dry combustion method with an Element Analyzer (Vario EL III, Elementar, Hanau, Germany), using soil pretreated with HCl, and the soil organic matter content was 1.724 × SOC. Nitrate and ammonium were extracted with 2 mol l−1 KCl and quantified using a Continuous Flow Analyzer (SAN++, Skalar, and Holand) [23]. Available phosphorus (AP) was extracted with 0.025 mol l−1 HCl + 0.03 mol l−1 NH4F and measured by a visible spectrophotometer [24]. Available potassium (AK) was extracted with NH4OAc and determined using ICP-OES [23].

2.4. DNA Extraction and High-Throughput Sequencing

Soil DNA was extracted using a commercial kit (FastDNA® SPIN kit for soil, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and samples were shipped to Personalbio (Shanghai Personal Biotechnology, Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for high-throughput sequencing using the Illlumina MiSeq platform. The V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was PCR-amplified using the forward primer 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3′) and the reverse primer 806R (5′- GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). PCR amplicons were purified using a PCR cleanup kit (Axygen) and quantified using a PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen). Amplicons were then were pooled in an equimolar concentration and sequenced on separate runs for MiSeq using a 2 × 300 bp paired-end protocol. Sequence data are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession number from SRR8992492 to SRR8992536.

2.5. Sequence Analysis

Raw data were quality-filtered using the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME v1.8.0) [25]. Sequences <150 bp and reads containing ambiguous bases or any unresolved nucleotides were removed. Chimeras were identified and removed using USEARCH [26]. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were assigned using UCLUST method at similarities of 97%. Any OTU representing less than 0.001% of the total filtered sequences was removed [27]. Indices of community diversity (Chao 1 and the Shannon index) were calculated in MOTHUR (http://www.mothur.org/).

2.6. Data Analysis

One-way ANOVAs and two-way ANOVAs were used to analyze depth and pavements effects on soil physio-chemical and microbial properties (LSD; P = 0.05). Linear models were conducted to verify relationships between bacterial diversity and soil properties. We determined bacterial community similarity among pavements and soil depth using ANOSIM; non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) was used to visualize clusters. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was performed to show a visual relationship between environmental factors and bacterial distributions. The resulting clustering trees were paired with a heatmap of abundance data, created with ‘heatmap.2’ from the ‘gplots’ package. The above statistical analyses were performed using the vegan package of R v.3.1.1 [28] and SPSS software v.18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Bacterial Community Composition

A total of 634,738 quality sequences were obtained across 45 soil samples, and were clustered into 11,597 OTUs after trimming and filtration. The RDP Classifier assigned the sequences to 42 phyla, 193 orders, 329 families, and 536 genera.
The bacterial composition was dominated (5%) by Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Nitrospirae, and Gemmatimonadetes; together this accounted for 85% to 95% of the total sequence data (Figure 1). The pavement altered the relative abundance of dominant phyla (ANOVA, p < 0.05), except for Acidobacteria at a depth of 0–20 cm. In contrast, there were no significant differences in the relative abundance of the five dominant phyla in the 20–40 cm layer. Only Acidobacteria (ANOVA, p = 0.018) and Proteobacteria (ANOVA, p = 0.002) showed significant changes in the 40–60 cm and 60–80 cm layer, respectively. There were significant differences in Chloroflexi (ANOVA, p = 0.005), Proteobacteria (ANOVA, p = 0.013), and Gemmatimonadetes (ANOVA, p = 0.02) at a depth of 80–100 cm.
Differences in the bacterial composition were analyzed using NMDS, based on the Braye–Curtis distance at the OTU level. Microbial communities from IPP were distinctively different from those in PP and NP soils in the 0–20 cm and 80–100 cm layer, as shown in the NMDS plot (Figure 2). The ANOSIM analysis further revealed that only the 0–20 cm layer (R = 0.778, p = 0.001) and 80–100 cm (R = 0.407, p = 0.009) layer underwent a significant shift in bacterial composition across different pavement types. Soil bacterial composition did not show any significant differences at a depth of 20–40 cm (R = 0.036, p = 0.332), 40–60 cm (R = 0.037, p = 0.294), and 60–80 cm (R = 0.021, p = 0.393). Moreover, no significant differences were found between IPP and PP at each depth in terms of bacterial composition. The ANOSIM analysis also showed that bacterial composition changed with soil depth under IPP (R = 0.6267, p = 0.001), PP (R = 0.4370, p = 0.012), and NP (R = 0.3452, p = 0.032).
A heatmap (with hierarchal clustering), based on the relative abundances of the top 50 genera, was generated to visualize the bacterial community composition better at the genus level (Figure 3). The distinctions were among different pavements, including very high relative abundances of Pseudomonas in the IPP and NP sites, and high relative abundance of Nitrospira and Thermoflexus in the IPP and NP sites. Also worthy of note is the high relative abundance of Gaiella, Solirubrobacter, and Bacillus in the three pavement samples.

3.2. Effects of Land Pavement on Soil Bacterial Alpha Diversity

The Chao 1 and the Shannon index were used to compare the levels of bacterial diversity. The Chao 1 and the Shannon index were the highest in the NP plots, and the lowest in the IPP plots at each soil layer. The bacterial richness is represented by the Chao 1 index (Table 1). The bacterial richness did not differ significantly among pavements at the 0–20 cm layer, whereas it was significantly lower in the IPP plots when compared to the NP plots at the other soil layers. When expressed as the Shannon index, diversity was significantly different between IPP sites and NP sites at the 0–20 cm and 80–100 cm layers, but there were no marked differences at the other soil layers. There were also no significant differences in the Chao 1 and the Shannon index except between IPP and PP at an 80–100 cm depth. Stepwise regression demonstrated that bacterial richness correlated with NO3−-N, AK, and AP. AP, SOC, and AK influenced soil bacterial diversity (Table 2).

3.3. Variables Correlated with Bacterial Abundance and Composition

The CCA analysis and Mantel test demonstrated the correlations between the soil bacterial community and the soil properties (Figure 4, Table 3). There was a significant difference in soil properties across different pavements (Table S1). In the surface soils, distinctions in the bacterial community structure correlated with TC and TN, whereas the observed soil properties were not associated with bacterial composition at the 20–40 cm layer. Soil bacterial structure was affected by NH4+-N and AP at the 40–60 cm layer and influenced by NO3--N and AP at the 60–80 cm layer. At the 80–100 cm soil layer, bacterial community structure had a close relationship with NH4+-N and NO3−N.
The Pearson correlation coefficient evaluated the relationship between edaphic properties and relative phyla abundance (Table S2). The results showed that the variation of the relative abundances of bacterial phyla had close correlations with soil properties. The phylum Actinobacteria, which was one of the most abundant phyla, was positively and significantly correlated with NH4+-N, TC, and AP concentrations (p < 0.05). The phylum Chloroflexi had a significant positive relationship with NO3−-N (p < 0.01), and a negative relationship with pH and NH4+-N (p < 0.05). The phylum Proteobacteria was influenced by pH, AP, NO3−-N, and TC (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

Our study provides experimental evidence that pavement is a driver of change in topsoil microbial communities, which is coincident with previous observational studies, suggesting that impervious surfaces affect soil microbial community composition, diversity, and biomass [29,30]. However, our study provides the evidence that the effects of pavement on subsoil microbial community are minor in the short-term experiment (i.e., five years of experimentally imposed pavement).
Corroborating the findings of a previous study [4], we showed that pavement disturbance changed the topsoil bacterial community composition. However, the pavement did not affect the soil bacterial community composition at the 20–80 cm layer, which may be because bricks had contact with topsoil directly, and thus had a greater impact on topsoil than subsoil in the short term. Moreover, plants affect the soil microbial community through belowground carbon allocation and nutrient movements [31,32]. Except for NO3−-N, there was no marked difference in soil properties between pavement and non-pavement at a depth of 20–80 cm in the present study. Correspondingly, plant roots may have a positive influence on microbial community composition by rhizosphere effects at the 20–80 cm layer [33]. It is interesting to note that soil bacterial community composition differed significantly between pavement and non-pavement at the 80–100 cm layer. Owing to the 80–100 cm layer was far from bricks, we could not be sure whether pavement induced these differences, and more experiments are necessary to explore the effects of pavement on deep soils.
Soil microbial diversity plays a critical role in maintaining ecosystem services, including nutrient cycling and litter decomposition [34,35]. Plant roots exert a large impact on soil micro-organisms and their habitat, and microflora had positive feedback plant growth [36,37]. Although previous research shows that both topsoil bacterial diversity and microbial functional diversity decreased beneath impervious surfaces without plants [4,30], we expected pavement near trees to have fewer negative effects on bacterial diversity. Pavement resulted in decreases in topsoil bacteria on the Shannon index rather than the Chao 1 in the present study. In contrast, the pavement had no influence on soil bacteria using the Shannon index, but reduced the bacterial Chao 1 at the 20–80 cm layer. This result demonstrates that bacterial species’ richness and diversity indices respond to pavements in different ways.
The bacterial community structure and diversity changed with artificial disturbance and was affected by abiotic factors [38,39]. Soil carbon and nitrogen were depleted under impervious surfaces [3], which had marked impacts on bacterial communities. Furthermore, microbial activities changed with soil carbon and nitrogen [35,40]. Although the content of carbon and nitrogen under pavement did not reduce sharply during the experimental period, TC and TN were the main factors that changed bacterial community composition at the 0–20 cm layer in the present study. Additionally, TC had a close relationship with the relative abundance of six dominant phyla, including Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Nitrospirae, GAL15, Firmicutes, and Planctomycetes, and TN affected the relative abundance of two dominant phyla. Moreover, ecosystem phosphorus and potassium supply strongly influence soil microbial community structures and nutrient cycling processes [41,42]. Soil bacterial diversity had a close relationship with AP and AK across different pavements in the present study.
PP, used instead of IPP, could benefit urban trees because the permeability to air and water directly affects the soil environment [22]. The effects of PPs on plants, soils, and micro-organisms differ depending on pavement porosity, profile design, and duration of pavements. Hu et al. [4] suggested that permeable pavements (bricks with a hole in the middle) are beneficial to the overall diversity of bacterial communities compared to IPP (concrete) after 10 years. However, Piotrowska-Długosz et al. [21] concluded that microbial biomass experienced no significant difference between impervious and PPs. Furthermore, Viswanathan et al. [22] found that pavements increase soil CO2 concentrations and reduce root production, but pervious concrete did not convey any measurable root growth benefits over impervious concrete. PPs changed bacterial richness (Chao 1) rather than bacterial community composition and diversity (Shannon index) in our study. These results demonstrated that PPs had no remarkable effects on bacterial communities when compared to IPPs in the short term.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our field experiment found that pavements changed topsoil bacterial community compositions and reduced the Shannon index at depths of 0–20 cm and 80–100 cm, but had no significant effects on them at the 20–80 cm layer. In contrast, pavements had reverse effects on the Chao 1 through the soil profile. Furthermore, PP did not alleviate the negative effects of pavements on bacterial communities. Soil nutrients, including TC, TN, SOC, NO3−-N, AP, and AK, were the key factors that influenced bacterial communities. This study examined soil bacterial communities under ash trees planted for a short term (five years), but plant species and age also are key factors that affect microbial community activity. Future studies should investigate how microbial communities respond to pavements over a longer period. These findings will be highly valuable in guiding the management of soils and plants in urban areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/10/1805/s1, Table S1: The two-way analysis variance of soil physical and chemical properties across land pavement. Data are expressed as mean ± SE, n = 3. SMC: soil moisture content; TC: total carbon; SOC: soil organic carbon; TN: total nitrogen; DOC: dissolved organic carbon; AP: available phosphorus; AK: available potassium. PP: pervious pavement; IPP: impervious pavement; NP: non-pavement, Table S2: Pearson’s correlation between soil characteristics and the relative abundance of abundant phyla.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W. and W.Y.; Methodology, W.Y., Y.C., and B.C.; Visualization, Y.H.; Writing—original draft and formal analysis, Y.H.; Writing—review and editing, Y.H., W.Y., and X.W.; funding acquisition, X.W.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571053, 71533005) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0503004).

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Xuming Wang for his help in the field experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Elvidge, C.D.; Tuttle, B.T.; Sutton, P.C.; Baugh, K.E.; Howard, A.T.; Milesi, C.; Bhaduri, B.; Nemani, R. Global Distribution and Density of Constructed Impervious Surfaces. Sensors 2007, 7, 1962–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Scalenghe, R.; Marsan, F.A. The anthropogenic sealing of soils in urban areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 90, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Raciti, S.M.; Hutyra, L.R.; Finzi, A.C. Depleted soil carbon and nitrogen pools beneath impervious surfaces. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 164, 248–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hu, Y.; Dou, X.; Li, J.; Li, F. Impervious Surfaces Alter Soil Bacterial Communities in Urban Areas: A Case Study in Beijing, China. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, D.; Li, F.; Wang, R. The effects of different urban land use patterns on soil microbial biomass nitrogen and enzyme activities in urban area of Beijing, China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2012, 32, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wolińska, A.; Stępniewska, Z.; Pytlak, A. The effect of environmental factors on total soil DNA content and dehydrogenase activity. Arch. Biol. Sci. 2015, 67, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agnelli, A.; Ascher, J.; Corti, G.; Ceccherini, M.T.; Nannipieri, P.; Pietramellara, G. Distribution of microbial communities in a forest soil profile investigated by microbial biomass, soil respiration and DGGE of total and extracellular DNA. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2004, 36, 859–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schlatter, D.C.; Bakker, M.G.; Bradeen, J.M.; Kinkel, L.L. Plant community richness and microbial interactions structure bacterial communities in soil. Ecology 2015, 96, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Bardgett, R.D.; Freeman, C.; Ostle, N.J. Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks. ISME J. 2008, 2, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Taylor, J.P.; Wilson, B.; Mills, M.S.; Burns, R.G. Comparison of microbial numbers and enzymatic activities in surface soils and subsoils using various techniques. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34, 387–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Will, C.; Thürmer, A.; Wollherr, A.; Nacke, H.; Herold, N.; Schrumpf, M.; Gutknecht, J.; Wubet, T.; Buscot, F.; Daniel, R. Horizon-Specific Bacterial Community Composition of German Grassland Soils, as Revealed by Pyrosequencing-Based Analysis of 16S rRNA Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 6751–6759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Van Leeuwen, J.P.; Djukic, I.; Bloem, J.; Lehtinen, T.; Hemerik, L.; de Ruiter, P.C.; Lair, G.J. Effects of land use on soil microbial biomass, activity and community structure at different soil depths in the Danube floodplain. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2017, 79, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stone, M.M.; Kan, J.; Plante, A.F. Parent material and vegetation influence bacterial community structure and nitrogen functional genes along deep tropical soil profiles at the Luquillo Critical Zone Observatory. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 80, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mullaney, J.; Lucke, T.; Trueman, S.J. A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2015, 134, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Szota, C.; Coutts, A.M.; Thom, J.K.; Virahsawmy, H.K.; Fletcher, T.D.; Livesley, S.J. Street tree stormwater control measures can reduce runoff but may not benefit established trees. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2019, 182, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Blume, E.; Bischoff, M.; Reichert, J.M.; Moorman, T.; Konopka, A.; Turco, R.F. Surface and subsurface microbial biomass, community structure and metabolic activity as a function of soil depth and season. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2002, 20, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fierer, N.; Schimel, J.P.; Holden, P.A. Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van Der Heijden, M.G.A.; Bardgett, R.D.; Van Straalen, N.M. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology 2008, 11, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liu, W.; Chen, W.; Peng, C. Influences of setting sizes and combination of green infrastructures on community’s stormwater runoff reduction. Ecol. Modell. 2015, 318, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sansalone, J.; Kuang, X.; Ying, G.; Ranieri, V. Filtration and clogging of permeable pavement loaded by urban drainage. Water Res. 2012, 46, 6763–6774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Piotrowska-Długosz, A.; Charzyński, P. The impact of the soil sealing degree on microbial biomass, enzymatic activity, and physicochemical properties in the Ekranic Technosols of Toruń (Poland). J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Viswanathan, B.; Volder, A.; Watson, W.T.; Aitkenhead-Peterson, J.A. Impervious and pervious pavements increase soil CO2 concentrations and reduce root production of American sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Urban For. Urban Green. 2011, 10, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bao, S.D. Soil Agricultural Chemical Elements Analysis; Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bray, R.H.; Kurtz, L.T.J.S.S. Determination of Total, Organic, and Available Forms of Phosphorus in Soils. Soil Sci. 1945, 59, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Peña, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Edgar, R.C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2460–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bokulich, N.A.; Subramanian, S.; Faith, J.J.; Gevers, D.; Gordon, J.I.; Knight, R.; Mills, D.A.; Caporaso, J.G. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods 2012, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhao, D.; Li, F.; Wang, R.; Yang, Q.; Ni, H.J.J.o.S. Effect of soil sealing on the microbial biomass, N transformation and related enzyme activities at various depths of soils in urban area of Beijing, China. J. Soils Sediments 2012, 12, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, Z.; Wu, S.; Zhou, S.; Lin, C. Installation of impervious surface in urban areas affects microbial biomass, activity (potential C mineralisation), and functional diversity of the fine earth. Soil Res. 2013, 51, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Steinauer, K.; Chatzinotas, A.; Eisenhauer, N. Root exudate cocktails: the link between plant diversity and soil microorganisms? Ecol. Evol. 2016, 6, 7387–7396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Miller, A.J.; Hirsch, P.R.; Dennis, P.G. Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 72, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Koranda, M.; Schnecker, J.; Kaiser, C.; Fuchslueger, L.; Kitzler, B.; Stange, C.F.; Sessitsch, A.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.; Richter, A. Microbial processes and community composition in the rhizosphere of European beech—The influence of plant C exudates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Maestre, F.T.; Reich, P.B.; Jeffries, T.C.; Gaitan, J.J.; Encinar, D.; Berdugo, M.; Campbell, C.D.; Singh, B.K. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wolińska, A.; Kuźniar, A.; Zielenkiewicz, U.; Banach, A.; Izak, D.; Stępniewska, Z.; Błaszczyk, M. Metagenomic analysis of some potential nitrogen-fixing bacteria in arable soils at different formation process. Microb. Ecol. 2017, 73, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schweitzer, J.A.; Bailey, J.K.; Fischer, D.G.; LeRoy, C.J.; Lonsdorf, E.V.; Whitham, T.G.; Hart, S.C. Plant–soil–microorganism interactions: Heritable relationship between plant genotype and associated soil microorganisms. Ecology 2008, 89, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gyaneshwar, P.; Naresh Kumar, G.; Parekh, L.J.; Poole, P.S. Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant Soil 2002, 245, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, M.; Heo, E.; Kang, H.; Adams, J.J.M.E. Changes in Soil Bacterial Community Structure with Increasing Disturbance Frequency. Microb. Ecol. 2013, 66, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. De Vries, F.T.; Manning, P.; Tallowin, J.R.B.; Mortimer, S.R.; Pilgrim, E.S.; Harrison, K.A.; Hobbs, P.J.; Quirk, H.; Shipley, B.; Cornelissen, J.H.C.; et al. Abiotic drivers and plant traits explain landscape-scale patterns in soil microbial communities. Ecology 2012, 15, 1230–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Spohn, M.; Klaus, K.; Wanek, W.; Richter, A. Microbial carbon use efficiency and biomass turnover times depending on soil depth—Implications for carbon cycling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 96, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bergkemper, F.; Schöler, A.; Engel, M.; Lang, F.; Krüger, J.; Schloter, M.; Schulz, S. Phosphorus depletion in forest soils shapes bacterial communities towards phosphorus recycling systems. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1988–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Masood, S.; Bano, A. Mechanism of Potassium Solubilization in the Agricultural Soils by the Help of Soil Microorganisms. In Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture; Meena, V.S., Maurya, B.R., Verma, J.P., Meena, R.S., Eds.; Springer India: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 16 01805 g001 550
Figure 1. Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial community at the phylum level in samples separated by pavement type category. Relative abundances were found to depend on the average relative number of the bacterial sequences of nine samples from a pavement type. Here, “others” is given with respect to the taxa with a maximum abundance of <0.5% in any sample.
Figure 1. Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial community at the phylum level in samples separated by pavement type category. Relative abundances were found to depend on the average relative number of the bacterial sequences of nine samples from a pavement type. Here, “others” is given with respect to the taxa with a maximum abundance of <0.5% in any sample.
Ijerph 16 01805 g001
Ijerph 16 01805 g002 550
Figure 2. The non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) of the bacterial communities comparing all 45 samples from the three pavement types. Sites have been color-coded according to pavement type. (A) 0–20 cm; (B) 20–40 cm; (C) 40–60 cm; (D) 60–80 cm; (E) 80–100 cm.
Figure 2. The non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) of the bacterial communities comparing all 45 samples from the three pavement types. Sites have been color-coded according to pavement type. (A) 0–20 cm; (B) 20–40 cm; (C) 40–60 cm; (D) 60–80 cm; (E) 80–100 cm.
Ijerph 16 01805 g002
Ijerph 16 01805 g003 550
Figure 3. Heatmap of dominant genera of soil bacteria and cluster analysis of bacterial community composition across pavement types. The heatmap and clustering were computed from Operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The blue denotes low relative abundance across a bacterial taxon, and the red denotes high relative abundance.
Figure 3. Heatmap of dominant genera of soil bacteria and cluster analysis of bacterial community composition across pavement types. The heatmap and clustering were computed from Operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The blue denotes low relative abundance across a bacterial taxon, and the red denotes high relative abundance.
Ijerph 16 01805 g003
Ijerph 16 01805 g004 550
Figure 4. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of the bacterial communities with symbols coded by pavement type under different soil depths. (A) 0–20 cm; (B) 20–40 cm; (C) 40–60 cm; (D) 60–80 cm; (E) 80–100 cm.
Figure 4. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of the bacterial communities with symbols coded by pavement type under different soil depths. (A) 0–20 cm; (B) 20–40 cm; (C) 40–60 cm; (D) 60–80 cm; (E) 80–100 cm.
Ijerph 16 01805 g004
Table
Table 1. The alpha diversity of bacterial communities in different land pavement. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE), n = 3. Different letters (a, b and c) indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 across different pavements. PP: pervious pavement; IPP: impervious pavement; NP: non-pavement.
Table 1. The alpha diversity of bacterial communities in different land pavement. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE), n = 3. Different letters (a, b and c) indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05 across different pavements. PP: pervious pavement; IPP: impervious pavement; NP: non-pavement.
DepthPavementChao 1 IndexShannon Index
0–20IPP2156.66 ± 321.27 a10.00 ± 0.07 b
PP2109.81 ± 499.54 a10.14 ± 0.02 b
NP2619.07 ± 68.48 a10.31 ± 0.06 a
20–40IPP2225.85 ± 344.99 b9.53 ± 0.66 a
PP2859.2 ± 491.24 a,b10.03 ± 0.26 a
NP3260.76 ± 131.40 a10.43 ± 0.04 a
40–60IPP2300.37 ± 172.86 b9.55 ± 0.39 a
PP2248.56 ± 323.33 b9.67 ± 0.36 a
NP3109.04 ± 74.06 a10.24 ± 0.08 a
60–80IPP1792.47 ± 51.24 b9.15 ± 0.61 a
PP2229.60 ± 308.81 ab9.75 ± 0.21 a
NP2234.90 ± 484.20 a9.80 ± 0.45 a
80–100IPP1668.99 ± 119.23 c8.87 ± 0.10 b
PP2309.48 ± 137.56 b9.86 ± 0.18 a
NP2505.97 ± 310.05 a10.06 ± 0.15 a
Table
Table 2. Results of stepwise regression for the effects of soil properties on the alpha diversity of bacterial communities. AP, available phosphorus; SOC, soil organic carbon; AK, available potassium.
Table 2. Results of stepwise regression for the effects of soil properties on the alpha diversity of bacterial communities. AP, available phosphorus; SOC, soil organic carbon; AK, available potassium.
IndexRegression ModelR2Fp
Shannony = 10.595 + 0.018 (AP) − 0.101 (SOC) − 0.006 (AK)0.41111.2520.000
Chao 1y = 3131.595 − 9.262 (NO3−-N) – 8.432(AK) + 6.863 (AP)0.2736.5090.001
Table
Table 3. Mantel test results for the correlation between community composition and environmental variables for bacteria across pavements. TC, total carbon; TN, total nitrogen. Bold numbers mean p < 0.05.
Table 3. Mantel test results for the correlation between community composition and environmental variables for bacteria across pavements. TC, total carbon; TN, total nitrogen. Bold numbers mean p < 0.05.
Depth (cm)0–2020–4040–6060–8080–100
RpRpRpRpRp
pH0.2010.0950.1650.137−0.0840.630.1850.207−0.1770.721
TC0.4070.024−0.1110.7590.0570.359−0.0490.546−0.0290.551
TN0.320.0340.0290.410.2830.0940.5890.051−0.0430.493
SOC0.1720.126−0.0460.5310.2280.1340.4580.0530.2630.123
NH4+−N0.0490.3930.0730.2980.3970.0300.6430.0180.5780.006
NO3−−N−0.0640.5980.0160.4210.2080.1670.6430.0280.4330.020
AP0.20760.1190.1480.1610.5020.0030.7810.002−0.2630.823
AK0.0050.4430.1030.276−0.0840.6610.1840.209−0.1770.750

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, W.; Hu, Y.; Cui, B.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X. The Effects of Pavement Types on Soil Bacterial Communities across Different Depths. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101805

AMA Style

Yu W, Hu Y, Cui B, Chen Y, Wang X. The Effects of Pavement Types on Soil Bacterial Communities across Different Depths. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(10):1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Weiwei, Yinhong Hu, Bowen Cui, Yuanyuan Chen, and Xiaoke Wang. 2019. "The Effects of Pavement Types on Soil Bacterial Communities across Different Depths" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 10: 1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101805

APA Style

Yu, W., Hu, Y., Cui, B., Chen, Y., & Wang, X. (2019). The Effects of Pavement Types on Soil Bacterial Communities across Different Depths. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101805

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop