Next Article in Journal
A Cost Benefit Analysis of an Active Travel Intervention with Health and Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits
Next Article in Special Issue
Early-Life Air Pollution Exposure, Neighborhood Poverty, and Childhood Asthma in the United States, 1990–2014
Previous Article in Journal
Inflamed Phylloides Tumour in a Girl: A Challenging Diagnosis in Paediatric Breast Lesions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Retooling CalEnviroScreen: Cumulative Pollution Burden and Race-Based Environmental Health Vulnerabilities in California
Open AccessArticle

Advice and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Citizen-Science Environmental Health Assessments

1
National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
2
Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
3
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
4
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(5), 960; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050960
Received: 29 March 2018 / Revised: 2 May 2018 / Accepted: 9 May 2018 / Published: 11 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Collection Achieving Environmental Health Equity: Great Expectations)
Citizen science provides quantitative results to support environmental health assessments (EHAs), but standardized approaches do not currently exist to translate findings into actionable solutions. The emergence of low-cost portable sensor technologies and proliferation of publicly available datasets provides unparalleled access to supporting evidence; yet data collection, analysis, interpretation, visualization, and communication are subjective approaches that must be tailored to a decision-making audience capable of improving environmental health. A decade of collaborative efforts and two citizen science projects contributed to three lessons learned and a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) that address the complexities of environmental health and interpersonal relations often encountered in citizen science EHAs. Each project followed a structured step-by-step process in order to compare and contrast methods and approaches. These lessons and FAQs provide advice to translate citizen science research into actionable solutions in the context of a diverse range of environmental health issues and local stakeholders. View Full-Text
Keywords: citizen science; environmental health assessment; decision analysis; local stakeholders; cumulative impacts; environmental justice citizen science; environmental health assessment; decision analysis; local stakeholders; cumulative impacts; environmental justice
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Barzyk, T.M.; Huang, H.; Williams, R.; Kaufman, A.; Essoka, J. Advice and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Citizen-Science Environmental Health Assessments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 960.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop