Next Article in Journal
Reference Intervals for Urinary Cotinine Levels and the Influence of Sampling Time and Other Predictors on Its Excretion Among Italian Schoolchildren
Previous Article in Journal
How Urban Parks Offer Opportunities for Physical Activity in Dublin, Ireland
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(4), 816; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040816

Design of Urban Public Spaces: Intent vs. Reality

1
Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Southern University of Denmark, Campusvej 55, Odense M, 5230, Denmark
2
Architecture Department, University of California-Berkeley, 230Wurster Hall #1820, Berkeley, CA 94720–1820, USA
3
Human Potential Centre, Auckland University of Technology, AUT Millennium, Room SA225, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 23 February 2018 / Revised: 5 April 2018 / Accepted: 19 April 2018 / Published: 21 April 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [3023 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

This study investigated how two public spaces for sport and recreation were utilized by different user groups, and how this aligned with the initial design objectives for these spaces. Two newly built urban spaces situated in Copenhagen, Denmark, provided the context for this investigation. The System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) was used to examine the physical activity of users in these two urban spaces. The architects responsible for designing each space were interviewed to ascertain the intended target group of each space and to unravel the reasons behind the design decisions. The SOPARC observations revealed that males were more vigorously active than females when using the recreation facilities, and the observed users did not align with the intended target groups. The interviews suggested that design decisions were based on minimal interdisciplinary knowledge, and that expert knowledge was chosen randomly. These findings point to a systematic lack of evidence-based practice when designing sport and recreational facilities. This article has implications for landscape architects and urban planners; a new method must be developed to embed interdisciplinary knowledge in the planning process of future sport and recreation projects. This must be done in a systematic way to make the design process transparent. View Full-Text
Keywords: activating architecture; physical activity; transparent design; evidence based design; interdisciplinary collaboration; SOPARC activating architecture; physical activity; transparent design; evidence based design; interdisciplinary collaboration; SOPARC
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hjort, M.; Martin, W.M.; Stewart, T.; Troelsen, J. Design of Urban Public Spaces: Intent vs. Reality. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 816.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top