Next Article in Journal
Use of a Survey to Assess the Environmental Exposure and Family Perception to Lead in Children (<6 Years) in Four Valley Cities, Northwestern China
Next Article in Special Issue
Common Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour among Office Workers
Previous Article in Journal
Eye on the Ball: Table Tennis as a Pro-Health Form of Leisure-Time Physical Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sedentary Behaviour and Hair Cortisol Amongst Women Living in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Neighbourhoods: A Cross-Sectional Study
Open AccessArticle

Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population

1
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117549, Singapore
2
PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
3
Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Centre Berlin, Berlin 10098, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(4), 739; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040739
Received: 30 January 2018 / Revised: 8 April 2018 / Accepted: 9 April 2018 / Published: 12 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sedentary Behaviour and Health)
This study examined the validity and reliability of a domain-specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) single-item sitting question using self- and interviewer-administered modes of administration against the triaxial ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer. The ASBQ and the GPAQ were administered twice, seven days apart. Participants were asked to put on the waist-worn accelerometer for seven days. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman’s rho, mean absolute error (MAE), and Bland-Altman analysis (n = 78). Reliability was assessed using the Spearman’s rho and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (n = 84). Participants were adults aged 20–65 years and identifying as Chinese, Malay, or Indian. Only the self-administered GPAQ was significantly correlated with accelerometry-based measures (rho: 0.46), but not the interviewer-administered version (rho: 0.12). MAE for GPAQ was 207.5–218.3 min/day in relation to the accelerometer and for ASBQ was 154.7–174.6 min/day. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated large limits of agreement between questionnaire and accelerometry-based measures. While the self-administered GPAQ demonstrated a moderate correlation with accelerometry, the mean bias and the limits of agreement were large. The GPAQ (rho: 0.68–0.79; ICC: 0.68–0.78) and the ASBQ (rho: 0.53–0.64; ICC: 0.66–0.74) showed moderate-to-good reliability for total sedentary time using either self- or interviewer-administration. Future research should incorporate accelerometers to generate useful sedentary behaviour measures. View Full-Text
Keywords: accelerometers; measurement; psychometrics; questionnaires; validation accelerometers; measurement; psychometrics; questionnaires; validation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Chu, A.H.Y.; Ng, S.H.X.; Koh, D.; Müller-Riemenschneider, F. Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040739

AMA Style

Chu AHY, Ng SHX, Koh D, Müller-Riemenschneider F. Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(4):739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chu, Anne H.Y.; Ng, Sheryl H.X.; Koh, David; Müller-Riemenschneider, Falk. 2018. "Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population" Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, no. 4: 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040739

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop