Next Article in Journal
Recognition of Consumers’ Characteristics of Purchasing Farm Produce with Safety Certificates and Their Influencing Factors
Previous Article in Journal
An Integrative, Systematic Review Exploring the Research, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Office Workers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 15
Issue 12
10.3390/ijerph15122877
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trajectories of Hospitalization Cost Among Patients of End-Stage Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study in China

by
Zhong Li
1,
Shan Jiang
2,
Ruibo He
1,
Yihan Dong
1,
Zijin Pan
1,
Chengzhong Xu
3,
Fangfang Lu
3,
Pei Zhang
3 and
Liang Zhang
1,*
1
School of Medicine and Health Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
2
School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China
3
Yichang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yichang 443000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(12), 2877; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122877
Submission received: 22 October 2018 / Revised: 24 November 2018 / Accepted: 10 December 2018 / Published: 15 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Health Economics)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study was conducted to investigate the trajectory of hospitalization costs, and to assess the determinants related to the membership of the identified trajectories, with the view of recommending future research directions. A retrospective study was performed in urban Yichang, China, where a total of 134 end-stage lung cancer patients were selected. The latent class analysis (LCA) model was used to investigate the heterogeneity in the trajectory of hospitalization cost amongst the different groups that were identified. A multi-nominal logit model was applied to explore the attributes of different classes. Three classes were defined as follows: Class 1 represented the trajectory with minimal cost, which had increased over the last two months. Classes 2 and 3 consisted of patients that incurred high costs, which had declined with the impending death of the patient. Patients in class 3 had a higher average cost than those in Class 2. The level of education, hospitalization, and place of death, were the attributes of membership to the different classes. LCA was useful in quantifying heterogeneity amongst the patients. The results showed the attributes were embedded in hospitalization cost trajectories. These findings are applicable to early identification and intervention in palliative care. Future studies should focus on the validation of the proposed model in clinical settings, as well as to identify the determinants of early discharge or aggressive care.

1. Introduction

The end-of-life (EOL) costs for cancer patients are of global concern [1,2,3]. Approximately 10% of the overall lifetime healthcare consumption occurs within the final 12 months of a patient’s life [4], during which time decedents with cancer undergo intensive medical treatment before death [5]. Complicated symptoms force end-stage cancer patients to seek care from the emergency department during their last years of life [6]. However, many people cannot afford the potentially life-saving or life-prolonging treatments that are available from hospitals, and this phenomenon is even worse in developing countries [7]. Aggressive care is the main driver of EOL costs, and it places substantial pressure on the consumption of scarce healthcare resources [8]. It was revealed that patients with intensive healthcare utilization underwent resource abuse during their final days of life [9]. In addition, whilst most palliative care services are provided in developed countries, nearly 80% of the global need is situated in developing countries; thus, the lack of access to palliative care is a global concern [10,11]. The World Bank income group, and the availability of national palliative care funding are also heavily correlated [12]. WHO has recommended that national palliative care systems be provided with adequate resources [13], and the World Health Assembly (WHA) 67.19 in 2014 pointed out that palliative care should be integrated as a part of the healthcare framework throughout a patient’s life [14]. In the USA, a hospice programme provides services for patients with a maximum expected survival period of six months [15]. EOL care in Canada includes inpatient hospitalization, chronic care facilities, or at-home care [16]. A study using health administrative data revealed that in the USA and Ontario, the mean monthly cost of a lung cancer patient increased with the patient’s impending death, mainly driven by inpatient hospitalization [17]. In Europe, many patients with end-stage diseases preferred a home death, but most of the patients died in hospitals [18,19]. Cancer specialists did not practice early palliative care as expected [20], and given the benefits of palliative care for the society, especially for the poor [21,22,23] and in developing countries, timely intervention in patients with incurable diseases has thus been widely proposed [24,25].
As the leading type of cancer, lung cancer accounts for 11.6% of the total cancer incidence, and 18.4% of the global mortality [26]. China recorded the highest incidence of death due to lung cancer, accounting for nearly 40% of global cancer-related deaths [12]. The Chinese government and medical institutions have widely promoted palliative medicine and hospice care [27]. However, with scarce resources, oncologists in tertiary hospitals struggle to meet the needs of cancer patients. Occasionally, the oncologists must persuade their patients to receive supportive care in local healthcare facilities or at home. Consequently, the practitioners at the primary care facilities were unable to meet the patients’ needs, including the palliation of symptoms and the management of pain [28]. Some patients and families must wait to be admitted to tertiary hospitals, or they face death [29,30]. However, the timing and the means of providing palliative care for patients with incurable and terminal illnesses in China are unclear and difficult to explore. Therefore, cross-national comparisons of EOL care based on different metrics are necessary [9].

2. Methods

2.1. Data Source and Study Population

Based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision, specifically, the WHO version for 2016 [31], 894 decedents diagnosed with cancer between July 2015 and June 2017 in urban Yichang, China, were enrolled into the study. The demographics of the cancer decedents, including place of death, type of cancer, and date of death, were collected from the National Population Death Registration and Management System. The Yichang Health Management Centre, which is affiliated with the Yichang Centre for Diseases Control and Prevention, has integrated hospital information systems, a health insurance database, and a population information database with patients’ identification card numbers. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (IORG No: 2018S291). All of the data were de-identified.

2.2. Study Design

Previous studies have faced groups of patients with different unobservable preferences and needs. These studies did not identify the actual differences based on the treatment pathways [32], but rather, the studies focused solely on the description of the differences in frequencies, thereby lowering the effects of timely intervention [33]. In 1968, Lazarsfeld and Henry introduced the latent class analysis (LCA) model to identify latent categorical attitude variables [34]. This method was widely used in marketing studies to classify consumers into specific segments to maximize within-segment homogeneity and between-segment heterogeneity, based on the response patterns [35]. In the field of health service science, LCA was applied to examine unobserved classes in healthcare utilization and cost [36,37]. Louviere argued for the frequent use of the LCA model, owing to its convenience in estimation and interpretation when used in health technology assessments [38]. However, diagnosis-based trajectory groups may not reflect the actual trajectory shapes within specific diagnostic groups, due to functional decline or healthcare utilization [39]. Several studies have shown that identifying the cost trajectory could help in implementing timely palliative care [5,40,41]. Fassbender et al. [40] attempted to unify death trajectories with cost data. Lunney et al. [42,43] evaluated the patterns of EOL healthcare expenditures using diagnosis-based trajectory groups. Several methods were applied to investigate the death trajectories and healthcare utilization costs of specific diseases, especially the EOL cost, based on the different kinds of databases [44,45], thereby indicating the importance of such trajectories in palliative care [46]. In this study, a total of 310 decedents diagnosed with lung cancer were initially included, and then 134 decedents who had survived for at least six months were the final participants included in the study. LCA, an alternative method to identify heterogeneity amongst patients, was performed on the enrolled patients to: (1) group the decedents with lung cancer based on the EOL hospitalization cost; (2) explore the attributes of the identified classes; and (3) make recommendations for future directions.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

First, descriptive analysis was used to enable a detailed description of the characteristics of the enrolled decedents. Second, LCA is a widely used data analysis approach to identify unobserved heterogeneity in a specific population [47,48]. Monte Carlo simulation has proven that the Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) is the best amongst the information criteria for homogeneous class enumeration [49]. Moreover, model selection should include the theoretical meanings (i.e., parsimony and interpretability) [31,50]. In this study, zero hospitalization cost was frequent, and cost frequency reduced the increase in cost. Thus, the censored normal model with the traj procedure was applied for data modelling [51]. Third, the Shapiro–Wilks test of normality was performed, as well as the Chi-squared test (Fisher exact test, if necessary), Analysis of Variance, and the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by the least significance difference and Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc method, which were used to compare the differences between the different classes. Finally, the multi-nominal logit model was used to identify the determinants of different cost categories [52]. The independent variables were as follows: (1) age, (2) gender, (3) level of education, (4) marital status, (5) type of medical insurance, (6) number of emergency department visits, (7) number of ICU admissions, (8) number of inpatients, (9) number of outpatients, and (10) period of survival. All the above-mentioned procedures were calculated using Stata 14.0. The statistical significance level was p < 0.05. The level of statistical marginal significance was set at 0.05 < p < 0.10, as described in [53].

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics

As shown in Table 1, amongst the 134 decedents, 74.6% (100) were male. The median age was 70 years old (p25–75, 63–78), and 85.8% (115) lived with their spouse. Approximately 71.6% (96) were enrolled in the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance scheme (UEBMI), and 73.1% (98) had a diploma or had only achieved a junior school level of education. The median survival period was 350 days (p25–75, 242–490), and 33.6% of the patients died at home (Table 1).

3.2. Latent Class Membership

Table 2 shows the results of model fitting, including the number of classes, the polynomial order of coefficients, the BIC, Akaike Information Criterion, and the log Bayes factor. The three-class model was the model that was best-suited to describe the heterogeneity of hospitalization cost trajectories, based on the comparison of fit indices with smaller BIC values than those of other models. Hence, the 134 decedents were grouped into three classes, namely, persistently low and increasing (Class 1), persistently high and decreasing (Class 2), and moderate and decreasing (Class 3), as shown in Figure 1.
As shown in Table 1, Class 1 (25.4%) consisted of decedents who were discharged from the hospital early prior to their death, and who were gradually readmitted to the hospital in their last two months of life, with an extremely low hospitalization cost. Class 2 (50.0%) contained decedents with a moderate cost of hospitalization that showed a decreasing trend in cost. In Class 3 (24.6%), the patients had an extremely high cost with a decreasing trend and a high intensity of care, where nearly all of the patients (97%) died in the hospital.
The demographic and economic characteristics of each class were examined. No significant differences in age (p = 0.444), gender (p = 0.095), survival period (p = 0.724), and outpatient services (p = 0.185) were observed amongst the three classes. Regarding marital status, the decedents in Class 1 exhibited a lower marriage rate (71%) than those in Classes 2 (91%, Chi-squared = 7.08, p = 0.008) and 3 (91%, Chi-squared = 4.42, p = 0.035). Class 3 had a higher rate of UEBMI enrolment (91%), compared to Classes 1 (91%, Chi-squared = 9.58, p = 0.008) and 2 (91%, Chi-squared = 8.15, p = 0.017). Class 3 had a higher level of education (i.e., reached at least senior school level) than Class 2 (81%, Chi-squared = 7.82, p = 0.005). For POD, Class 3 had a higher rate (97%) of death in medical institutions than Classes 1 (91%, Chi-squared = 22.34, p < 0.001) and 2 (91%, Chi-squared = 13.51, p < 0.001). Regarding hospitalization frequency and EOL hospitalization cost, Class 3 had the highest hospitalization frequency, followed by Classes 2 and 1. Class 3 also had a higher median occurrence of emergency department visits than class 1 (Chi-squared = 6.43, p = 0.011).

3.3. Class Membership Determinants

In this study, the R2 generated from the multi-nominal logistic regression model was 39.69%, indicating an adequate model fitness as described in Reference [54]. The different classes had three attributes. As shown in Table 3, although some p-values were marginally significant, individuals who had received at least a senior school diploma had a 4.71-fold (RR = 4.71, p = 0.093) and 3.48-fold (RR = 3.48, p = 0.039) probability of being classified in Class 3 than in Classes 1 and 2, respectively. For individuals who died at home, the probability of being classified in Classes 2 and 3 decreased by 78.2% (RR = 0.258, p = 0. 064) and 98.4% (RR = 0.0160, p = 0.002), respectively, compared to Class 1. The possibility of being classified in Class 3 decreased by 99.4% (RR = 0.062, p = 0.017) compared to Class 2. When the occurrence of hospitalization increased by one unit, individuals had a 3.87-fold (RR = 3.87, p < 0.001) and 5.69-fold (RR = 5.69, p < 0.001) probability of being classified in Classes 2 and 3, respectively, compared to Class 1. Individuals had a 1.47-fold probability (RR = 1.47, p < 0.001) of being classified in Class 3 than in class 2.

4. Discussion

LCA is widely applied in cancer-related studies of clinical epidemiology and health economics [5,39,55,56,57]. Real-world data is ideal when investigating the EOL care cost in a large population [58]. To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first to apply LCA to the quantification of hospitalization cost trajectories amongst decedents with end-stage lung cancer in China. This study made a substantial contribution to the current research on cancer cost trajectory, especially its determinants. These results have potential use in the timely intervention of palliative care.
Three classes were identified throughout the evolution of hospitalization cost, based on the BIC and the interpretability of the model. This result was consistent with a study conducted in 2015 using a representative sample of Swiss decedents [5]. However, one class (i.e., 1% of patients aged 66 years old and 4% of young individuals) in the Swiss decedents study showed a steep increase in the average monthly healthcare expenditure in their last month of life [5], indicating the use of intensive medical treatment prior to death. The overall survival period from first-diagnosis to death amongst the decedents enrolled was 350 days. Approximately 85.8% of the patients lived with a spouse. The POD was a valid indicator of where care was provided in the final days or hours of life [59]. The overall rate of home death was 33.6%, thereby ranking at a medium level when compared to the home death rates in 14 countries during 2008 [12]. The above results indicated the existence of a certain level of EOL care intensity. A sizable proportion of decedents still utilized healthcare resources [60], thereby hampering the promotion of home-based palliative care and home death.
The trajectories of Class 2 and 3 showed a considerable decline over the last six months of life when compared to Class 1. The Class 1 curve remained stable, and increased with impending death. This result may be due to the disregard of aggressive care by some patients when death was expected, resulting from the patient’s acceptance and wish for a good death [61]. However, the patients in Classes 2 and 3 and their caregivers did not seem to have fully discussed their approaching death at an early stage, resulting in a high rate of inpatient hospitalization and hospital death. This result was also consistent with the results of a comparative study between the USA and Ontario, Canada [62]. Moreover, the availability of hospice care or willingness to receive palliative care may also explain such differences [8]. Several studies have shown that most patients with advanced cancer faced an increase in symptom burden during the EOL period, thereby forcing them to seek care in hospitals [8]. Management of anxiety, confusion, or delirium in a home setting can be very difficult. Thus, an emergency department visit or hospitalization may be precipitated by the patients’ families, due to distress [63,64]. For the patients in Classes 2 and 3, especially the Class 3 patients with a high hospitalization cost, the high cost may have been because the patients were not informed of the approaching death [65]. The services that these patients received were to prolong their lives instead of the palliation of their symptoms [66]. In addition, the Class 3 patients accounted for 24.6% of the enrolled patients. However, the overall survival period of these patients was not higher than that of Class 1 and 2 patients. This finding was similar to the evidence found in the USA, where high-intensity care was not related to improved outcomes [67].
As described previously, the traditional regression-based method for exploring the determinants of EOL cost neglected the heterogeneity that was formed by the treatment intensity amongst the patients [39,59]. The predictors, namely, level of education, POD, and inpatient hospitalization, for the three classes, were identified by using the multi-nominal logit regression model. Amongst the three classes, the highest rates of being married, of death in hospitals (97%), and the highest amount of hospitalization services were found in Class 3 patients. Patients with a low education level possessed an increased risk of poor healthcare utilization, which may have been influenced by multichannel factors, such as resource availability and financial capability of their families [68]. Hence, enhancement of consultation services should be urgently established to improve EOL palliative care [61]. In this study, home death decreased the probability of high-cost trajectories (i.e., Classes 2 and 3). The higher the frequency of inpatient hospitalization of the individual, the higher the probability of being grouped in Class 2 and 3. Hospital death and inpatient hospitalization could increase the EOL healthcare cost [9,12,14,17]. Shepperd et al. pointed out that early assisted discharge could reduce the hospitalization cost [69]. Furthermore, home hospice care was a cost-saving alternative to inpatient hospice care in many countries [58].
In general, our findings described capacity-building opportunities for a quality palliative care system. Failure to identify the need for palliative care, and intervention of early discharge for the decedents caused the above phenomenon. Based on these results, we can cautiously speculate on the presence of a huge potential for cost-saving that is associated with the improvement of the cancer healthcare delivery system. Hence, treatment variation and heterogeneity should be actively addressed. As family physicians play an important role in hospice care in many countries [12,17], substantial challenges exist for the Chinese primary care system that should also be addressed [70]. Providing timely intervention in targeted palliative care should also be addressed together with the families [12].
Similar to other research, this study had limitations, which included the sample size and the presence of few marginally significant p-values. Large-scale studies using real-world data should be conducted. Moreover, preference-related, family, and community-level variables should also be collected. Future works should focus on: (1) The validation of the model based on additional risk or protective factors and the usefulness of the model for clinical decision-making, and (2) The identification of potential determinants of early discharge and aggressive care in end-stage patients.

5. Conclusions

This study was the first to explore the trajectory of hospitalization costs amongst patients with end-stage lung cancer. Different classes of patients had different preferences in healthcare utilization and cost. The results of this study will help to improve the palliative care system, including targeted information and early discharge from hospitals when possible. Such results will also help physicians, policymakers, patients, and their families in making shared decisions.

Author Contributions

For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “conceptualization, Z.L. and L.Z, P.Z.; methodology, Z.L. and S.J; software, Z.L.; validation, S.J., Z.P. and Y.D.; formal analysis, Z.L.; investigation, S.J.; resources, P.Z.; data curation, C.X. and F.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.L.; writing—review and editing, L.Z. and S.J.; visualization, Z.L.; supervision, L.Z.; project administration, L.Z., C.X. and F.L.; funding acquisition, L.Z.

Funding

This project was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71734003).

Acknowledgments

We thank all the staff involved in the establishment of the Yichang Health Management Data Analysis Center, including experts from the Yichang Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data sharing statement

All research data is available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Dikshit, R.; Eser, S.; Mathers, C.; Rebelo, M.; Parkin, D.M.; Forman, D.; Bray, F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer Manag. 2015, 136, E359–E386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Round, J.; Jones, L.; Morris, S. Estimating the cost of caring for people with cancer at the end of life: A modelling study. Palliat. Med. 2015, 29, 899–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kain, D.; Eisenhauer, E. Early integration of palliative care into standard oncology care: Evidence and overcoming barriers to implementation. Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stooker, T.; van Acht, J.W.; van Barneveld, E.M.; van Vliet, R.C.; van Hout, B.A.; Hessing, D.J.; Busschbach, J.J. Costs in the last year of life in The Netherlands. Inquiry 2001, 38, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Von Wyl, V.; Telser, H.; Weber, A.; Fischer, B.; Beck, K. Cost trajectories from the final life year reveal intensity of end-of-life care and can help to guide palliative care interventions. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care 2018, 8, 325–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cotogni, P.; Saini, A.; De Luca, A. In-Hospital Palliative Care: Should We Need to Reconsider What Role Hospitals Should Have in Patients with End-Stage Disease or Advanced Cancer? J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Røe, O.D. The high cost of new cancer therapies—A challenge of inequality for all countries. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 1169–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goossens, L.M.; Utens, C.M.; Smeenk, F.W.; Donkers, B.; van Schayck, O.C.; Rutten-van Mölken, M.P. Should I stay or should I go home? A latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment on hospital-at-home. Value Health 2014, 17, 588–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bekelman, J.E.; Halpern, S.D.; Blankart, C.R.; Bynum, J.P.; Cohen, J.; Fowler, R.; Kaasa, S.; Kwietniewski, L.; Melberg, H.O.; Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. Comparison of Site of Death, Health Care Utilization, and Hospital Expenditures for Patients Dying with Cancer in 7 Developed Countries. JAMA 2016, 315, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lynch, T.; Connor, S.; Clark, D. Mapping levels of palliative care development: A global update. J. Pain Symp. Manag. 2013, 45, 1094–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cohen, J.; Pivodic, L.; Miccinesi, G.; Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.; Naylor, W.; Wilson, D.; Loucka, M.; Csikos, A.; Pardon, K.; Van den Block, L. International study of the place of death of people with cancer: A population-level comparison of 14 countries across 4 continents using death certificate data. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 113, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sharkey, L.; Loring, B.; Cowan, M.; Riley, L.; Krakauer, E.L. National palliative care capacities around the world: Results from the World Health Organization Noncommunicable Disease Country Capacity Survey. Palliat. Med. 2017, 32, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Breitbart, W. Palliative care as a human right. J. Pain Symp. Manag. 2009, 38, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. WHO. WHA67.19—Strengthening of Palliative Care as a Component of Comprehensive Care throughout the Life Course. 2014. Available online: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js21454ar/ (accessed on 10 November 2018).
  15. Roscoe, L.A.; Schonwetter, R.S. Improving access to hospice and palliative care for patients near the end of life: Present status and future direction. J. Palliat. Care. 2006, 22, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Wilson, D.M.; Birch, S.; Sheps, S.; Thomas, R.; Justice, C.; MacLeod, R. Researching a best-practice end-of-life care model for Canada. Can. J. Aging 2008, 27, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bremner, K.E.; Krahn, M.D.; Warren, J.L.; Hoch, J.S.; Barrett, M.J.; Liu, N.; Barbera, L.; Yabroff, K.R. An international comparison of costs of end-of-life care for advanced lung cancer patients using health administrative data. Palliat. Med. 2015, 29, 918–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Higginson, I.J.; Sengupta, G.J. Place of care in advanced cancer: A qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences. J. Palliat. Med. 2000, 3, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Townsend, J.; Frank, A.; Fermont, D.; Dyer, S.; Karran, O.; Walgrove, A.; Piper, M. Terminal cancer care and patients’ preference for place of death: A prospective study. BMJ 1990, 301, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Charalambous, H.; Pallis, A.; Hasan, B.; O’Brien, M. Attitudes and referral patterns of lung cancer specialists in Europe to Specialized Palliative Care (SPC) and the practice of Early Palliative Care (EPC). BMC Palliat. Care 2014, 13, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, B.; Wright, A.A.; Huskamp, H.A.; Nilsson, M.E.; Maciejewski, M.L.; Earle, C.C.; Block, S.D.; Maciejewski, P.K.; Prigerson, H.G. Health care costs in the last week of life: Associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Smith, S.; Brick, A.; O’Hara, S.; Normand, C. Evidence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of palliative care: A literature review. Palliat. Med. 2014, 28, 130–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Starks, H.; Wang, S.; Farber, S.; Owens, D.A.; Curtis, J.R. Cost savings vary by length of stay for inpatients receiving palliative care consultation services. J. Palliat. Med. 2013, 16, 1215–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nakano, K.; Furutama, J.; Sunada, S. Quality of end-of-life care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in general wards and palliative care units in Japan. Support. Care Cancer 2012, 20, 883–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wright, A.A.; Zhang, B.; Keating, N.L.; Weeks, J.C.; Prigerson, H.G. Associations between palliative chemotherapy and adult cancer patients’ end of life care and place of death: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2014, 348, g1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on the Implementation of Basic Standard and Management of Hospice Care Centre (Trial Version). Available online: http://www.moh.gov.cn/yzygj/s3593/201702/2f50fdc62fa84cdd9d9a09d5162a661f.shtml (accessed on 13 December 2018). (In Chinese)
  28. Wright, A.A.; Keating, N.L.; Ayanian, J.Z.; Chrischilles, E.A.; Kahn, K.L.; Ritchie, C.S.; Weeks, J.C.; Earle, C.C.; Landrum, M.B. Family perspectives on aggressive cancer care near the end of life. JAMA 2016, 315, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Shi, J.; Shi, C.; Yue, X.; Huang, H.; Wang, L.; Lou, P.; Mao, A.; Dai, M. Economic burden of cancer in China during 1996–2014: A systematic review. Chin. J. Oncol. 2016, 38, 929–941. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, W.; Sun, K.; Zhen, R.; Zhang, S.; Zeng, H.; Zou, X.; Hao, J. Report of Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Different Areas of China, 2014. China Cancer 2018, 27, 1–14. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. WHO. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10). Available online: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/ICD10Volume2_en_2010.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2018).
  32. Sørensen, S.S.; Jensen, M.B.; Pedersen, K.M.; Ehlers, L. Examining the Heterogeneity and Cost Effectiveness of a Complex Intervention by Segmentation of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Value Health 2018, 21, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Newcomer, R.; Maravilla, V.; Faculjak, P.; Graves, M.T. Outcomes of preventive case management among high-risk elderly in three medical groups: A randomized clinical trial. Eval. Health Prof. 2004, 27, 323–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lazarsfeld, P.; Henry, N. Latent Structure Analysis; Houghton Mifflin: New York, NY, USA, 1968; ISBN 0395047684. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wedel, M.; Kamakura, W.A. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2012; Volume 8. [Google Scholar]
  36. Deb, P.; Holmes, A.M. Estimates of use and costs of behavioural health care: A comparison of standard and finite mixture models. Health Econ. 2000, 9, 475–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shi, Q.; Mendoza, T.R.; Gunn, G.B.; Wang, X.S.; Rosenthal, D.I.; Cleeland, C.S. Using group-based trajectory modeling to examine heterogeneity of symptom burden in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing aggressive non-surgical therapy. Qual. Life Res. 2013, 22, 2331–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Louviere, J.J. What you don’t know might hurt you: Some unresolved issues in the design and analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2006, 34, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gill, T.M.; Gahbauer, E.A.; Han, L.; Allore, H.G. Trajectories of disability in the last year of life. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 1173–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Fassbender, K.; Fainsinger, R.L.; Carson, M.; Finegan, B.A. Cost trajectories at the end of life: The Canadian experience. J. Pain Symp. Manag. 2009, 38, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Copeland, T.P.; Hillman, J.M.; Franc, B.L. Contextualizing Oncologic Imaging Utilization through End-of-Life Spending Patterns. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2017, 14, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lunney, J.R.; Lynn, J.; Hogan, C. Profiles of older medicare decedents. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002, 50, 1108–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lunney, J.R.; Lynn, J.; Foley, D.J.; Lipson, S.; Guralnik, J.M. Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. JAMA 2003, 289, 2387–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kane, P.M.; Daveson, B.A.; Ryan, K.; McQuillan, R.; Higginson, I.J.; Murtagh, F.E. The need for palliative care in Ireland: A population-based estimate of palliative care using routine mortality data, inclusive of nonmalignant conditions. J. Pain Symp. Manag. 2015, 49, 726–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rosenwax, L.; McNamara, B.; Blackmore, A.; Holman, C. Estimating the size of a potential palliative care population. Palliat. Med. 2005, 19, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McNamara, B.; Rosenwax, L.K.; Holman, C.A.J. A method for defining and estimating the palliative care population. J. Pain Symp. Manag. 2006, 32, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Jedidi, K.; Jagpal, H.S.; DeSarbo, W.S. Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Market. Sci. 1997, 16, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ye, T.; Zhang, P.; Ouyang, Z.; Yang, J.; Xu, C.; Pan, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Li, B. Multi-trajectory modeling of home blood pressure telemonitoring utilization among hypertensive patients in China: A latent class growth analysis. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2018, 119, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nylund, K.L.; Asparouhov, T.; Muthén, B.O. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct. Equ. Model. 2007, 14, 535–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Collins, L.M.; Lanza, S.T. Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 718. [Google Scholar]
  51. Jones, B.L.; Nagin, D.S. A Note on a Stata Plugin for Estimating Group-based Trajectory Models. Sociol. Methods Res. 2013, 42, 608–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mcfadden, D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. Front. Econom. 1974, 105–142. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wasserstein, R.L.; Lazar, N.A. The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. Am. Stat. 2016, 70, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fagerland, M.W.; Hosmer, D.W.; Bofin, A.M. Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models. Stat. Med. 2010, 27, 4238–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lubitz, J.D.; Riley, G.F. Trends in Medicare Payments in the Last Year of Life. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 45, 565–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hui, D.; Kim, S.H.; Roquemore, J.; Dev, R.; Chisholm, G.; Bruera, E. Impact of timing and setting of palliative care referral on quality of end-of-life care in cancer patients. Cancer 2014, 120, 1743–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ness, D.L.; Johnson, B.H. Dying in America: A constructive step forward and an opportunity to deepen partnerships with patients and families. Ann. Intern. Med. 2015, 162, 226–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Langton, J.M.; Blanch, B.; Drew, A.K.; Haas, M.; Ingham, J.M.; Pearson, S.A. Retrospective studies of end-of-life resource utilization and costs in cancer care using health administrative data: A systematic review. Palliat. Med. 2014, 28, 1167–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Earle, C.C.; Park, E.R.; Lai, B.; Weeks, J.C.; Ayanian, J.Z.; Block, S. Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 1133–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Teno, J.M.; Gozalo, P.L.; Bynum, J.P.; Leland, N.E.; Miller, S.C.; Morden, N.E.; Scupp, T.; Goodman, D.C.; Mor, V. Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: Site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009. JAMA 2013, 309, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Haishan, H.; Hongjuan, L.; Tieying, Z.; Xuemei, P. Preference of Chinese general public and healthcare providers for a good death. Nurs. Ethics 2015, 22, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ho, T.H.; Barbera, L.; Saskin, R.; Lu, H.; Neville, B.A.; Earle, C.C. Trends in the Aggressiveness of End-of-Life Cancer Care in the Universal Health Care System of Ontario, Canada. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 1587–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Barbera, L.; Taylor, C.; Dudgeon, D. Why do patients with cancer visit the emergency department near the end of life? Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2010, 182, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Smith, A.K.; Fisher, J.; Schonberg, M.A.; Pallin, D.J.; Block, S.D.; Forrow, L.; Phillips, R.S.; McCarthy, E.P. Am I doing the right thing? Provider perspectives on improving palliative care in the emergency department. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2009, 54, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hoff, L.; Tidefelt, U.; Thaning, L.; Hermerén, G. In the shadow of bad news—views of patients with acute leukaemia, myeloma or lung cancer about information, from diagnosis to cure or death. BMC Palliat. Care 2007, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Au, D.H.; Udris, E.M.; Fihn, S.D.; McDonell, M.B.; Curtis, J.R. Differences in health care utilization at the end of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and patients with lung cancer. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006, 166, 326–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wright, A.A.; Zhang, B.; Ray, A.; Mack, J.W.; Trice, E.; Balboni, T.; Mitchell, S.L.; Jackson, V.A.; Block, S.D.; Maciejewski, P.K. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 2008, 300, 1665–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Montez, J.K.; Friedman, E.M.; Montez, J.K.; Friedman, E.M. Educational attainment and adult health: Under what conditions is the association causal? Soc. Sci. Med. 2015, 127, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Shepperd, S.; Iliffe, S.; Doll, H.A.; Clarke, M.J.; Kalra, L.; Wilson, A.D.; Gonçalves-Bradley, D.C. Admission avoidance hospital at home. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Li, Z.; Yang, J.; Wu, Y.; Pan, Z.; He, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, L. Challenges for the surgical capacity building of township hospitals among the Central China: A retrospective study. Int. J. Equity Health 2018, 17, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 15 02877 g001 550
Figure 1. Results of the latent class analysis model.
Figure 1. Results of the latent class analysis model.
Ijerph 15 02877 g001
Table
Table 1. Comparison of demographic characteristic, EOL care utilization, and hospitalization cost.
Table 1. Comparison of demographic characteristic, EOL care utilization, and hospitalization cost.
Characteristic OverallClass 1
(n = 34)		Class 2
(n = 67)		Class 3
(n = 33)		 χ 2 / F P-Value
Age (n = 134), p50 (p25–75)70 (63–78)76 (62–80)69 (63–78)70 (67–75)1.6260.444
Gender
Male100 (74.6%)23(68%)48 (72%)29 (88%)4.7080.095
Female34 (25.4%)11(32%)19 (28%)4 (12%)
Marital status
Married 115 (85.8%)24 (71%)61 (91%)30 (91%)7.6970.021
Others19 (14.2%)10 (29%)6 (9%)3 (9%)
Insurance type
UEBMI96 (71.6%)21 (62%)45 (67%)30 (91%)14.0640.007
URBMI19 (14.2%)6 (18%)10 (15%)3 (9%)
NRCMS19 (14.2%)7 (20%)12 (18%)0
Education
<= Junior school (n = 98)98 (73.1%)25(74%)54 (81%)19 (58%)10.6080.031
>= Senior school (n = 36)36 (26.9%)9 (26%)13 (19%)14 (42%)
Place of death
Medical institution89 (66.4%)15 (44%)42 (63%)32 (97%)26.899<0.001
Home45 (33.6%)19 (56%)25 (37%)1 (3%)
Survival (Days)350 (242–490)347 (225–521)329 (248–443)363 (231–528)0.6450.724
OP4 (1–12)3 (1–10)7 (2–14)3 (1–12)3.3810.185
EDV3 (1–5)1 (1–2)3 (2–5)5 (3–6)51.988<0.001
IHS #1 (0–3)1 (0–2)1 (0–3)2 (1–4)6.0920.048
ICU0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1.5260.466
Hospitalization cost in the last six months *30996 (11504–85896)445 (0–7108)31141 (18582–56415)128165 (98924–163944)102.389<0.001
Note: EOL, End-of-life; UEBMI, Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance; URBMI, Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance; NRCMS, New Rural Cooperative Medical System; OP, outpatient services; IHS, inpatient hospitalization services; EDV, emergency department visit; ICU, intensive care unit. # 3 > 2 (Chi-squared = 7.67, p = 0.006), 2 > 1 (Chi-squared = 35.97, p < 0.001), 3 > 1 (Chi-squared = 41.46, p < 0.001); * 3 > 2 (Chi-squared = 60.90, p < 0.001), 2>1 (Chi-squared = 51.79, p < 0.001), 3 > 1 (Chi-squared = 50.32, p < 0.001).
Table
Table 2. Results of model fitness.
Table 2. Results of model fitness.
Number of ClassPolynomial Order of CoefficientsBIC (N = 134)AIC (N = 134)Log Bayes Factors
11−4999.24−4994.894991.89
222−4923.09−4911.54903.5
3211−4916.23−4901.744891.74
41113−4925.77−4905.484891.48
Note: BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion; AIC, Akaike Information Criterion.
Table
Table 3. Determinants of the membership in the different classes.
Table 3. Determinants of the membership in the different classes.
VariablesGroups Class 2 (vs Class 1)Class 3 (vs Class 1)Class 3 (vs Class 2)
BetaP95% CIBetaP95% CIbetaP95% CI
GenderFemale (vs Male)−0.0020.998(−1.421–1.417)−0.8450.397(−2.800–1.109)−0.8420.261(−2.313–0.628)
Age65–80 (vs<65)0.2220.78(−1.338–1.782)0.4730.639(−1.501–2.447)0.2510.73(−1.173–1.676)
>80 (vs<65)0.3290.765(−1.827–2.484)0.3180.821(−2.430–3.065)−0.010.992(−2.011–1.99)
Health InsuranceURBMI (vs UEBMI)−0.20.863(−2.452–2.054)15.2780.995(−4682–4713)15.4780.995(−4682–4713)
NRCMS (vs UEBMI)−0.910.36(−2.848–1.034)14.5670.995(−4683–4712)15.4740.995(−4682–4713)
Marital statusOthers (vs Married)0.9890.26(−0.731–2.709)1.2880.309(−1.191–3.768)0.2990.76(−1.615–2.214)
Education≥SS (vs≤ JS)0.3030.701(−1.245–1.852)1.550.093(−0.26–3.361)1.2470.039(0.063–2.431)
PODHome (vs Hospital)−1.350.064(−2.784–0.079)−4.1370.002(−6.79–1.484)−2.7840.017(−5.073–0.496)
Survival −0.0020.244(−0.007–0.002)−0.0030.172(−0.009–0.002)−0.0010.53(−0.005–0.003)
OP 0.0210.543(−0.046–0.088)0.0160.704(−0.067–0.101)−0.0040.873(−0.061–0.052)
EDV −0.060.588(−0.263–0.149)−0.0370.729(−0.252–0.176)0.0190.72(−0.085–0.124)
IHS 1.354<0.001(0.749–1.959)1.739<0.001(1.0864–2.392)0.3850.005(0.118–0.652)
ICU 0.940.42(−1.344–3.223)1.7440.199(−0.918–4.408)0.8050.323(−0.791–2.401)
Note: In this model, number of observation = 131, LR chi2(26) = 107.83, p < 0.001, Pseudo R-squared = 0.3969. UEBMI, the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance; URBMI, Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance; NRCMS, New Rural Cooperative Medical System; POD, place of death; JS, Junior School; SS, Senior School; OP, outpatient services; IHS, inpatient hospitalization services; EDV, emergency department visits; ICU, intensive care unit.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Jiang, S.; He, R.; Dong, Y.; Pan, Z.; Xu, C.; Lu, F.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, L. Trajectories of Hospitalization Cost Among Patients of End-Stage Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2877. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122877

AMA Style

Li Z, Jiang S, He R, Dong Y, Pan Z, Xu C, Lu F, Zhang P, Zhang L. Trajectories of Hospitalization Cost Among Patients of End-Stage Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(12):2877. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122877

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zhong, Shan Jiang, Ruibo He, Yihan Dong, Zijin Pan, Chengzhong Xu, Fangfang Lu, Pei Zhang, and Liang Zhang. 2018. "Trajectories of Hospitalization Cost Among Patients of End-Stage Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study in China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 12: 2877. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122877

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop