Next Article in Journal
Dynamics of Implementation and Maintenance of Organizational Health Interventions
Next Article in Special Issue
Air Pollution and Dispensed Medications for Asthma, and Possible Effect Modifiers Related to Mental Health and Socio-Economy: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Swedish Children and Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
Pricing of Staple Foods at Supermarkets versus Small Food Stores
 
 
Article

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Green Space Quality and Accessibility—Evidence from a Southern European City

1
EPIUnit–Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal
2
Departamento de Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(8), 916; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080916
Received: 9 July 2017 / Revised: 9 August 2017 / Accepted: 11 August 2017 / Published: 15 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Achieving Environmental Health Equity: Great Expectations)
Background: The provision of green spaces is an important health promotion strategy to encourage physical activity and to improve population health. Green space provision has to be based on the principle of equity. This study investigated the presence of socioeconomic inequalities in geographic accessibility and quality of green spaces across Porto neighbourhoods (Portugal). Methods: Accessibility was evaluated using a Geographic Information System and all the green spaces were audited using the Public Open Space Tool. Kendall’s tau-b correlation coefficients and ordinal regression were used to test whether socioeconomic differences in green space quality and accessibility were statistically significant. Results: Although the majority of the neighbourhoods had an accessible green space, mean distance to green space increased with neighbourhood deprivation. Additionally, green spaces in the more deprived neighbourhoods presented significantly more safety concerns, signs of damage, lack of equipment to engage in active leisure activities, and had significantly less amenities such as seating, toilets, cafés, etc. Conclusions: Residents from low socioeconomic positions seem to suffer from a double jeopardy; they lack both individual and community resources. Our results have important planning implications and might contribute to understanding why deprived communities have lower physical activity levels and poorer health. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban health; green areas; built environment; physical activity; environmental justice urban health; green areas; built environment; physical activity; environmental justice
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoffimann, E.; Barros, H.; Ribeiro, A.I. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Green Space Quality and Accessibility—Evidence from a Southern European City. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080916

AMA Style

Hoffimann E, Barros H, Ribeiro AI. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Green Space Quality and Accessibility—Evidence from a Southern European City. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(8):916. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080916

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoffimann, Elaine, Henrique Barros, and Ana Isabel Ribeiro. 2017. "Socioeconomic Inequalities in Green Space Quality and Accessibility—Evidence from a Southern European City" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14, no. 8: 916. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080916

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop