Next Article in Journal
Is Pedometer-Determined Physical Activity Decreasing in Czech Adults? Findings from 2008 to 2013
Next Article in Special Issue
A Case Study of Upper-Room UVGI in Densely-Occupied Elementary Classrooms by Real-Time Fluorescent Bioaerosol Measurements
Previous Article in Journal
Tobacco Control Progress in Low and Middle Income Countries in Comparison to High Income Countries
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beneficial Effects of UV-Radiation: Vitamin D and beyond
Open AccessReview

UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate?

Institute for Environmental Health, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria
Institute for Meteorology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna 1180, Austria
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Paul B. Tchounwou
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(10), 1041;
Received: 31 August 2016 / Revised: 14 October 2016 / Accepted: 18 October 2016 / Published: 24 October 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue UV-Radiation: From Physics to Impacts)
Ultra-Violet (UV) radiation covers the spectrum of wavelengths from 100 to 400 nm. The potency and biological activity for a variety of endpoints differ by wavelength. For monitoring and communication purposes, different UV action spectra have been developed. These spectra use different weighting functions. The action spectrum for erythemal dose is the most widely used one. This erythemal dose per time or dose-rate has been further simplified into a “UV index”. Following this example, in our review we use the term “index” or (plural) “indices” in a more general description for all simplified single-value measures for any biologically effective UV dose, e.g., for human non-melanoma skin cancer and for previtamin D production rate. Ongoing discussion about the existence of an increased melanoma risk due to UV-A exposure underscores the uncertainties inherent in current weighting functions. Thus, we performed an online literature search to review the data basis for these indices, to understand their relevance for an individual, and to assess the applicability of the indices for a range of exposure scenarios. Even for natural (solar) UV, the spectral composition varies spatially and temporally. Artificial UV sources and personal protection introduce further variation to the spectral composition. Many biological effects are proposed for UV radiation. Only few endpoints have been studied sufficiently to estimate a reliable index. Weighting functions for chronic effects and most importantly for cancer endpoints have been developed in animal models, and often for proxy endpoints only. Epidemiological studies on biological effects of UV radiation should not only depend on single-value weighted UV dose estimates (indexes) but should strive for a more detailed description of the individual exposure. A better understanding of the adverse and beneficial effects of UV radiation by wavelength would also improve medical counseling and health communication regarding individual health-supportive behavior. View Full-Text
Keywords: UV indices; weighting function; frequency range; health endpoints UV indices; weighting function; frequency range; health endpoints
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Moshammer, H.; Simic, S.; Haluza, D. UV “Indices”—What Do They Indicate? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1041.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

Back to TopTop