Next Article in Journal
The Relationship of Policymaking and Networking Characteristics among Leaders of Large Urban Health Departments
Next Article in Special Issue
Risk Factors for Salmonella, Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli and Campylobacter Occurrence in Primary Production of Leafy Greens and Strawberries
Previous Article in Journal
Brand Cigarillos: Low Price but High Particulate Matter Levels—Is Their Favorable Taxation in the European Union Justified?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Combined Disinfection Methods for Reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7 Population on Fresh-Cut Vegetables
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/ijerph120809154
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between the Hygiene Index Values of Live Fresh Aquatic Products and Food-Borne Diarrhea in the Population of the Ningbo Area in China

by
Lijun Zhang
1,2,
Lu Lu
2,
Liye Shu
2,
Jianjun Chen
2,
Baobo Zou
1,
Qi Zhou
1,
Yuanliang Gu
1,
Jinshun Zhao
1,* and
Xialu Lin
1,3,*
1
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathological and Physiological Technology, Medical School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
2
Jiangdong Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo 315040, China
3
Key Laboratory of Trace Elements and Endemic Diseases of Ministry of Health, Health Science Center, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(8), 9154-9168; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809154
Submission received: 16 May 2015 / Accepted: 29 July 2015 / Published: 6 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Safety)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To investigate the association of the hygiene index values of live fresh aquatic products and food-borne diarrhea in the population of the Ningbo area in China. Volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), histamine (HIS), indole, tetrodotoxin (TTX), and paralytic, neurotoxic, amnesic and diarrhetic shellfish poisons (PSP, NSP, ASP, and DSP, respectively) in the samples of live fresh aquatic products and food-borne diarrhea cases in six studied districts were analyzed. Results indicate that the incidence rate of food-borne diarrhea is related to the hygiene index values. Aside from VBN, the main risk factors related to food-borne diarrhea in edible aquatic products include DSP (in marine fish, shrimp, and other shellfishes), NSP, and ASP (in marine shrimp and crab). Hygiene index values among different species were significantly different. No significant difference in the monitoring index values was found among the six different studied districts. The reported cases of food-borne diarrhea were positively associated with VBN and DSP in aquatic products in Haishu, Jiangbei, Zhenhai, and Beilun, as well as VBN and NSP in aquatic products in Jiangdong and Yinzhou. In conclusion, VBN, DSP, NSP, and ASP are important risk factors for the occurring of food-borne diarrhea in the population of the Ningbo area in China.

1. Introduction

Aquatic product poisoning is a significant public health problem in China and around the world [1,2,3,4,5]. Its consumption is an important cause of the food-borne diarrhea. Dai et al. reported that, according to the active surveillance of spot hospitals in Jiangsu province in 2008, 14.3% of food-borne illness cases were caused by aquatic product consumption [6]. Li et al. reported that seafood ranked the third potential risk food to cause food-borne illness in Guangdong province in 2012 [7]. 18.6% outbreaks of the food-borne diseases could be assigned to the fish category in the United States during 1998–2008 [5]. Epidemiological evidence suggests that the major factors contributing to food-borne diarrhea in aquatic products may depend on their quality, such as freshness, allergen content or biological toxin content [8]. The factors of food-borne diarrhea caused by the aquatic products consumption can be classified into four types: bacterial, parasitic, viral, and chemical causes [9]. The common chemical causes of food-borne diarrhea in aquatic products including histamine (HIS), tetrodotoxin (TTX), paralytic, neurotoxic, amnesic, and diarrhetic shellfish poisons (PSP, NSP, ASP, and DSP, respectively) etc. were all established indices and routinely monitored in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in China [10,11]. PSP could accumulate in the body of Chlamys farreri [12], Mytilus edulis, oysters [13], Argopecten irradians, and Chlamys Mimachlamys nobilis [14]. DSP could accumulate in the body of edible shellfish such as scallops, mussels, oysters, and clams [15]. Chen et al. reported that, in a food-borne disease outbreak attributed to the consumption of mussels contaminated by DSP, suspension of mussel sales was highly effective in controlling this outbreak [16]. Meanwhile, volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), histamine (HIS), and indole are used as the freshness indicators for the live fresh aquatic products [17]. The US CDC reported that HIS fish poisoning constituted nearly 40% of all seafood-related food-borne illnesses [5].
Ningbo, a city on the eastern sea coast of China, produces a wide variety of aquatic products [18]. Residents in this area are used to eating aquatic products, especially seafood. As a result, seasonal intestinal diseases often break out because of aquatic product consumption [19]. According to the Annual Report (2006) of Ningbo CDC, intestinal diseases related to eating aquatic products accounted for 20.48% of the total number of Notifiable Infectious Diseases. To better monitor the quality of the aquatic products in Ningbo market, live fresh aquatic products were sampled and the amount of VBN, HIS, indole, TTX, PSP, NSP, ASP, and DSP was analyzed. Moreover, an ecological study was performed to investigate the association between the hygiene indices of live fresh aquatic products and the food-borne diarrhea in the Ningbo population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling

Six out of eleven districts in the Ningbo area were randomly selected in this study, which covered 51.8% of the total household population (481.2 million out of 927.7 million) in 2013. In these six districts, 33 main farm markets and supermarkets were selling live fresh aquatic products, 28 of these were randomly chosen for sample monitoring for this study. Random sampling was conducted on the species having the largest monthly sales. Sampling time was always from the 1st to the 15th of each month. Every month, 100–120 monitoring samples were collected with a total of 1362 samples in a year. Eight categories including 34 species of aquatic products were sampled. They are: freshwater fish category-Carassius auratus, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, and Cyprinus carpio; marine fish category-Larimichthys polyactis, Metynnis hypsauchen, Trichiurus lepturus, Pneumatophorus japonicus, Scomberomorus niphonius, Pneumatophorus japonicus, and Cynoglossus gracilis; river crab category-Eriocheir sinensis, and Eriocheir sinensis; river prawn category-Macrobranchium nipponense; sea crab category-Portunus trituberculatus, Lithodes formosae, and Portunus pelagicus; shellfish category-Ruditapes philippinarum, Sinonovacula constrzcta, Mactra veneriformis, Moerella iridescens, Chlamys farreri, Neptunea cumingi Crosse, Thais clavigera Kuster, Babylonia areolata, and Corbicula aurea Heude; shrimp category-Penaeus vannamei Boone, Exopalaemon carinicauda, Trachypenaeus curvirostris, Parapenaeopsis hardwickii, and Solenocera melantho; and sleeve-fish category-Loligo chinensis, Sepia officinalis, and Octopus vulgaris.
The data reporting the number of food-borne diarrhea cases was obtained from the China National Epidemic Reporting Network, which was affirmed by the CDC in the six studied districts. To better analyze the correlation between food-borne diarrhea and hygiene indexes, in our study, the food-borne diarrhea cases only included those infectious diarrhea cases caused by aquatic products consumption with epidemiological investigation confirmation. According to Diagnostic Criteria for Infectious Diarrhea WS 271-2007 in China, cholera, dysentery, and typhoid were excluded in this study. In addition, hepatitis A, a communicable disease, was also excluded [20].

2.2. Monitoring Indices and Methods

The hygiene indices for quality monitoring of live fresh aquatic products were selected according to the most harmful chemicals that potentially cause food-borne diarrhea in the Ningbo area [21], including VBN, HIS, indole, TTX, PSP, NSP, ASP, and DSP. A questionnaire on aquatic products species with the largest monthly sales was completed by the sales managers in the markets in the studied districts [22]. The main contents of the questionnaire included names of the markets, type of sales, species of aquatic products, daily sales, methods of preserving freshness, etc. [23]. In addition, the aquatic products were purchased by random sampling with a daily amount (average 1 kg) for a normal three people family, and were packaged in plastic bags and then taken back to the laboratory for immediate analyzing. It is worthy of note that in this field study, no specific permissions were required for these locations/activities because Jiangdong CDC is authorized for the official monitoring the hygiene index values of live fresh aquatic products for the whole Ningbo area. To assure quality control, all samples were pretreated before analyzing which included removing the skin (or shell), eviscerating, gutting, and rinsing with redistilled water (SN/T 1773-2006 and GB/T 5009.212-2008) [24,25]. Then, the edible parts of the samples were selected, chopped, and mixed thoroughly.
VBN was measured by a Semi Micro Kjeldahl Method [26]. A total of 10 g sample was placed in a 250 mL glass conical flask and 100 mL of double-distilled water was added. The mixture was subsequently stirred on a shaker for 30 min, and then filtered with a 0.22 μm filter membrane and 5 mL of the filtrate was added to a Semi Micro Kjeldahl apparatus. After a 5 min steam-distillation, 10 mL of 2% boric acid absorption liquid was added, and then the mixed solution was titrated with hydrogen chloride standard solution. The coefficient of variation (CV) of this method for this sample set was 3.2%.
For the HIS measurement, a 10 g sample was placed in a 50 mL beaker and 30 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid was added. The mixture was shaken for 3 h, and then filtered with a 0.22 μm filter membrane. The filtrate was extracted with hexane and an azo reagent was added for coloration. The quantity of HIS was detected by colorimetry at a wavelength of 480 nm. The minimum detection level of this method was 5 mg HIS/100 g sample, and the recovery ratio was 97.5% to 102.3%. The two given methods were both in accordance with the CANS L0467 (China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment) and accreditation method GB/T5009.45.
For the indole measurement, a 10 g sample was placed in a 50 mL centrifuge tube and 50 mL methanol and 1 mL 2-methylindole (6.25 μg/mL, an internal standard) were added. The mixture was then homogenized with a high-speed mixing apparatus for 3 min, and then centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 r/min. The supernatant was filtered with a 0.22 μm filter membrane, and 20 μL samples were used for the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) measurement. The mobile phase was methanol:water (60:40); flow rate was 0.8 mL/min; chromatographic column was 30 cm × 4 mm; C18; fluorescence detector excitation wavelength was 280 nm; and the fluorescence wavelength was 330 nm [27]. The indole standard calibration solutions were 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 μg/L, and the amount of indole was quantified in samples by measuring the height of the indole/2-methylindole peak. The minimum detectable limit of this method was 1 μg indole/100 g sample, CV was 1.5% to 2.8%, and recovery rate was 99.8% to 101.5%, in accordance with AOAC 18.080-51.006.
Indices of toxins were measured with a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit purchased from Abraxis, the enzyme-labeled meter was MK-3, and results were calculated using a logistic four-parameter model. The minimum detectable limit of TTX was 3.2 ng TTX/100 g samples, CV was 5.2%, and recovery rate was 89.9% to 112.4%. The minimum detectable limit of DSP was 5.6 ng DSP/100 g samples, CV was 4.8%, and recovery rate was 91.39% to 108.20%. The minimum detectable limit of PSP was 1.4 ng PSP/100 g samples, CV was 3.1%, and recovery rate was 77.9% to 115.4%. The minimum detectable limit of ASP was 0.6 ng ASP/100 g sample, CV was 8.9%, and recovery rate was 82.4% to 109.7%. The minimum detectable limit of NSP was 3.3 µg NSP/100 g samples, CV was 4.9%, and recovery rate was 85.4% to 112.3%. The above mentioned quality control for measuring the amount of toxins in each sample was all in the technical parameter range of the kit.

2.3. Quality Control

For quality control, five parallel samples were used to measure the VBN in each time sample. A standard recovery was used to determine the accuracy of the results of HIS and indole measurements. An ELISA kit was used to measure the toxins [28]. For the quality control of toxins, five random samples in the same district and month were also analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS). The coincidence rates of the LCMS and ELISA results were as follows: TTX 90.0% (54/60), PSP 91.7% (55/60), DSP 96.7% (58/60), ASP 86.7% (52/60), NSP 85.0% (51/60).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All measured results were established in an Excel database and analyzed with SPSS 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences of hygiene index values in live fresh aquatic products among different months, districts, or different kinds of aquatic products. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the number of food-borne diarrhea cases and the hygiene index of live fresh aquatic products. The p value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered to have statistical significance. All results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

3. Results

3.1. The Time Statistical Distribution Analysis

Table 1 shows the time statistical distribution of different hygiene index values among live fresh aquatic products from January to December. The F-values show that, except for indole, all other hygiene index values are significantly different (p < 0.05) among different months (January through December). The relatively higher values of VBN were found in July and August, HIS in November, December and January, Indole in March, TTX in January, November and February, PSP in January and February, NSP in June, ASP in January and June, and DSP in August and October, respectively. In addition, although no significant difference of indole values were found among different months, a relative higher amount of indole was detected in some mollusk aquatic products such as squid and octopus.

3.2. Location Distribution Analysis

Table 2 shows the location distribution of the different hygiene index values of live fresh aquatic products among six districts. No significant difference in the monitoring index values was found among the six different districts (p < 0.05).

3.3. Category Distribution Analysis

Table 3 shows the category distribution of the different hygiene index values among different live fresh aquatic products. The hygiene index values were all significantly different among different categories (p < 0.05). The mean amount of VBN in shrimp, river prawn, sea crab, and sleeve-fish, indole in shrimp and river prawn, HIS in freshwater and marine fishes, exceeded the related standard limits (see Table 1). Shellfish toxins (PSP, NSP, ASP, and DSP) in the shellfish samples were not found to exceed the related standard limits (see Table 1).
Table
Table 1. Time statistical distribution of the different hygiene index values of live fresh aquatic products.
Table 1. Time statistical distribution of the different hygiene index values of live fresh aquatic products.
TimeNumber of SamplesVBN (mg/100 g) mean ± SDHIS (mg/100 g) mean ± SDIndole (mg/100 g) mean ± SDTTX (μg/kg) mean ± SDPSP (μg/kg) mean ± SDNSP (μg/kg) mean ± SDASP (ng/kg) mean ± SDDSP (μg/kg) mean ± SD
January11220.58 ± 0.52193.20 ± 25.871.72 ± 0.2817.32 ± 3.223.16 ± 0.390.002 ± 0.00049.77 ± 1.450.43 ± 0.029
February10920.64 ± 1.1446.81 ± 21.781.02 ± 0.1616.03 ± 2.903.36 ± 0.420.001 ± 0.00035.66 ± 0.480.40 ± 0.030
March10118.73 ± 0.9422.55 ± 4.3611.02 ± 10.028.86 ± 1.821.21 ± 0.190.001 ± 0.00037.12 ± 0.390.40 ± 0.025
April11721.28 ± 0.9626.19 ± 3.231.49 ± 0.242.71 ± 0.971.08 ± 0.240.009 ± 0.00173.72 ± 0.140.39 ± 0.027
May12013.97 ± 0.9161.21 ± 4.961.06 ± 0.181.85 ± 0.740.59 ± 0.070.061 ± 0.00558.43 ± 1.510.50 ± 0.027
June12013.57 ± 1.0263.99 ± 5.082.48 ± 0.421.15 ± 0.530.51 ± 0.060.082 ± 0.00808.75 ± 2.040.37 ± 0.039
July12143.45 ± 4.6787.51 ± 11.534.49 ± 1.933.04 ± 0.971.27 ± 0.220.048 ± 0.00717.21 ± 0.360.51 ± 0.026
August11050.15 ± 6.5865.69 ± 11.901.71 ± 0.297.59 ± 2.210.98 ± 0.180.030 ± 0.00206.04 ± 0.320.81 ± 0.085
September10917.31 ± 0.76160.19 ± 18.920.77 ± 0.103.18 ± 1.540.54 ± 0.090.003 ± 0.00068.49 ± 1.460.66 ± 0.037
October12121.28 ± 1.05113.71 ± 21.301.17 ± 0.248.23 ± 3.040.61 ± 0.170.002 ± 0.00055.54 ± 0.650.79 ± 0.099
November10919.94 ± 0.98309.66 ± 49.790.40 ± 0.1116.33 ± 3.831.40 ± 0.470.004 ± 0.00144.73 ± 0.200.49 ± 0.032
December10720.72 ± 1.18253.94 ± 43.781.23 ± 0.2113.26 ± 2.852.49 ± 0.380.006 ± 0.00144.80 ± 0.260.50 ± 0.022
F a—22.03211.5371.0727.90712.94860.8393.2757.766
p-value b—<0.001<0.0010.380<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
Threshold limit 30, 25, 20, 15, 10 c100, 30 d0.05 e50 f800 g800 h2 × 107i600, N.D.j
Notes: a ANOVA (n = 12, α = 0.05). b p < 0.05 was statistically significant. c VBN: Hygienic Standard for Fresh and Frozen Marine Products of Animal Origin in China GB 2733-2005, the standard threshold limit of VBN is 30 mg/100 g in marine fish, shrimp and cephalopod, 25 mg/100 g in sea crab, 20 mg/100 g in freshwater fish and shrimp, 15 mg/100 g in marine shellfish, and 10 mg/100 g in Gymnocypris przewalskii and oyster [29]. d HIS: Hygienic Standard for Fresh and Frozen Marine Products of Animal Origin in China GB 2733-2005, the standard threshold limit of HIS is 100 mg/100 g in Pneumatophorus japonicus, and 30 mg/100 g in other fishes [30]. e Indole: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the content of indole is used to estimate the freshness of shrimp. For level one freshness, the content of indole should be less than 250 μg/kg; for level three freshness it should be no more than 500 μg/kg (= 0.05 mg/100 g) [31]. f TTX: The threshold limit of TTX in aquatic product (50 μg/kg) [32]. g PSP: Safety Qualification for Agricultral Product-Safety Requirements for Non-environmental Pollution Aquatic Products GB 18406.4-2001, the standard threshold limit of PSP (800 μg/kg) [33]. h NSP: U.S. FDA, the standard threshold limit of NSP in clam, mussel, and oyster (800 μg/kg) [34]. i ASP: Live and Raw Bivalve Molluscs CODEX STAN 292-2008, the standard threshold limit of ASP in shellfish (2 × 107 ng/kg) [35]. j DSP: Safety Qualification for Agricultral Product-Safety Requirements for Non-environmental Pollution Aquatic Products GB 18406.4-2001, the standard threshold limit of DSP (600 μg/kg); Non-environmental Pollution Food- the Limitation of Harmful Substances in Aquatic Products NY5073-2006, the standard threshold limit of DSP was “not detectable” (N.D.) in mouse bioassay system, which mean less than 220 μg/kg [36].
Table
Table 2. Location distribution of the different hygiene index values of live fresh aquatic products among six districts.
Table 2. Location distribution of the different hygiene index values of live fresh aquatic products among six districts.
DistrictNumber of SamplesVBN (mg/100 g) mean ± SDHIS (mg/100 g) mean ± SDIndole (mg/100 g) mean ± SDTTX (μg/kg) mean ± SDPSP (μg/kg) mean ± SDNSP (μg/kg) mean ± SDASP (ng/kg) mean ± SDDSP (μg/kg) mean ± SD
Haishu22320.83 ± 1.09111.92 ± 16.746.39 ± 4.568.34 ± 1.821.40 ± 0.190.023 ± 0.00366.39 ± 0.580.47 ± 0.024
Jiangdong22127.05 ± 2.77128.38 ± 16.771.64 ± 0.229.35 ± 1.691.85 ± 0.240.026 ± 0.00387.20 ± 0.870.56 ± 0.034
Jiangbei24523.79 ± 2.07109.94 ± 17.252.19 ± 0.969.70 ± 1.871.38 ± 0.190.021 ± 0.00337.51 ± 1.050.53 ± 0.048
Yinzhou25725.09 ± 1.76117.15 ± 18.771.22 ± 0.138.60 ± 1.571.35 ± 0.210.016 ± 0.00235.83 ± 0.380.49 ± 0.020
Zhenhai19723.02 ± 1.97111.56 ± 17.951.22 ± 0.165.84 ± 1.221.25 ± 0.190.022 ± 0.00317.11 ± 0.730.56 ± 0.045
Beilun21320.81 ± 1.19114.22 ± 14.321.29 ± 0.156.27 ± 1.451.23 ± 0.170.021 ± 0.00346.18 ± 0.530.52 ± 0.029
F a—1.9170.1810.6530.5470.9351.0431.0091.360
p-value b—0.1050.9480.6210.7020.4420.3840.4010.246
a ANOVA (n = 6, α = 0.05); b p < 0.05 was statistically significant.
Table
Table 3. Category distribution of the different hygiene index values among the different live fresh aquatic products.
Table 3. Category distribution of the different hygiene index values among the different live fresh aquatic products.
CategoryNumber of SamplesVBN (mg/100 g) mean ± SDHIS (mg/100 g) mean ± SDIndole (mg/100 g) mean ± SDTTX (μg/kg) mean ± SDPSP (μg/kg) mean ± SDNSP (μg/kg) mean ± SDASP (ng/kg) mean ± SDDSP (μg/kg) mean ± SD
Shellfish24211.21 ± 4.5843.32 ± 5.980.23 ± 0.08825.04 ± 2.703.43 ± 0.2530.012 ± 0.00138.18 ± 0.5540.49 ± 0.044
Freshwater fish25814.45 ± 0.59117.33 ± 9.090.42 ± 0.1060.14 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.0090.014 ± 0.00193.59 ± 0.7840.26 ± 0.016
Marine fish37626.00 ± 1.15191.13 ± 23.512.43 ± 0.1864.78 ± 0.640.88 ± 0.1520.019 ± 0.00206.00 ± 0.5730.53 ± 0.018
Shrimp14434.65 ± 4.5885.60 ± 14.571.37 ± 0.2094.33 ± 1.461.52 ± 0.2210.035 ± 0.00476.66 ± 0.3570.63 ± 0.042
River prawn2722.34 ± 1.0857.42 ± 4.681.14 ± 0.2280.00 ± 0.000.20 ± 0.0790.010 ± 0.00522.00 ± 0.3250.27 ± 0.044
River crab2215.88 ± 1.3774.56 ± 12.200.35 ± 0.1320.00 ± 0.000.05 ± 0.0480.000 ± 0.00001.98 ± 0.2610.50 ± 0.069
Sea crab16534.63 ± 2.73113.54 ± 13.750.93 ± 0.11412.71 ± 2.001.93 ± 0.1960.040 ± 0.007412.09 ± 0.3580.67 ± 0.055
Sleeve-fish12232.71 ± 2.7379.72 ± 11.0513.82 ± 6.783.19 ± 2.071.68 ± 0.2880.027 ± 0.00346.99 ± 0.1940.83 ± 0.041
F a—8.4759.9372.29828.61636.1134.83811.04311.659
p-value b—<0.001<0.0010.033<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001<0.001
a ANOVA (n = 8, α = 0.05); b p < 0.05 was statistically significant.

3.4. Correlation Analysis

Table 4 shows the reported number of food-borne diarrhea cases during the same time period as the monitoring index values of live fresh aquatic products in the six districts. The food-borne diarrhea cases occurred in July, August, and September accounted for 44.3% (2466/5567) of the total cases for the year. The low-incidence months were April, January, February, and March, respectively.
Table 5 shows the correlation analysis between the reported food-borne diarrhea cases and the monitoring index values of live fresh aquatic products. Food-borne diarrhea case number has a significant correlation (p < 0.05) with the amount of VBN or DSP in live fresh aquatic products.
Table 6 shows the correlation between the number of food-borne diarrhea cases and the monitoring index values of live fresh aquatic products among different districts. There was a significant correlation between the number of food-borne diarrhea cases and the amount of VBN (p < 0.05) in all six studied districts. A significant correlation between the number of food-borne diarrhea cases and the amount of DSP was also found in most districts (p < 0.05). In Yinzhou District, the amount of TTX, PSP or NSP were significantly correlated with the number of food-borne diarrhea cases (p < 0.05). In Jiangdong district, the amount of NSP shows a significant correlation with the number of food-borne diarrhea cases (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Reported case number of the food-borne diarrhea in six districts.
Table 4. Reported case number of the food-borne diarrhea in six districts.
TimeDistrictTotal Case Number
HaishuJiangdongJiangbeiYinzhouZhenhaiBeilun
January762767331121235
February802762251915228
March70245731916207
April651828391620186
May10425521312390425
June11855731863790559
July1856314823249121798
August2305915220977244971
September173421441954598697
October1083475783491420
November742981973496411
December11840100982054430
Total1401443103913543749565567
Table
Table 5. The correlation of food-borne diarrhea and the monitoring index of live fresh aquatic products over 12 months.
Table 5. The correlation of food-borne diarrhea and the monitoring index of live fresh aquatic products over 12 months.
CorrelationVBNHISIndoleTTXPSPNSPASPDSP
Coeff. a0.6860.050−0.166−0.393−0.4280.4170.1530.642
p-value b0.0070.4390.3030.1030.0820.0890.3180.012
a Pearson coefficient (n = 12, α = 0.10); b p < 0.05 was statistically significant.
Table
Table 6. The correlation of food-borne diarrhea and the monitoring index of live fresh aquatic products in different districts.
Table 6. The correlation of food-borne diarrhea and the monitoring index of live fresh aquatic products in different districts.
DistrictVBNHISIndoleTTXPSPNSPASPDSP
HaishuCoeff. a0.743−0.078−0.114−0.390−0.3500.3300.1650.673
p-value b0.0030.4050.3620.1050.1320.1480.3050.008
JiangdongCoeff. a0.644−0.013−0.020−0.346−0.2770.5320.2190.394
p-value b0.0120.4850.4750.1350.1910.0380.3470.103
JiangbeiCoeff. a0.6860.218−0.084−0.137−0.1740.1010.1520.611
p-value b0.0070.2480.3970.3350.2940.3770.3180.017
YinzhouCoeff. a0.501−0.003−0.140−0.585−0.5530.6280.2880.434
p-value b0.0490.4960.3330.0230.0310.0140.1820.079
ZhenhaiCoeff. a0.730−0.010−0.239−0.325−0.4490.3340.0010.714
p-value b0.0030.4790.2270.1510.0720.1450.4990.005
BeilunCoeff. a0.7080.017−0.220−0.300−0.4800.3820.0190.739
p-value b0.0050.4790.2470.1710.0570.1090.4760.003
a Pearson coefficient (n = 12,α = 0.10); b p < 0.05 was statistically significant.

4. Discussion

From January through December in 2013, we sampled the live fresh aquatic products from 28 main markets and supermarkets in six districts in the Ningbo area. The samples selected included 34 species of live fresh aquatic products, which are in high demand and commonly consumed by the Ningbo population. During the same time, food-borne diarrhea cases in these six districts were collected from the epidemiological databases. Thereafter, association between the hygiene index values of live fresh aquatic products and food-borne diarrhea in the population of the Ningbo area was analyzed. Based on the statistical analysis of the dynamic trend of the related hygiene index values, except for that of indole, all other index values were significant different in different seasons. In the first season (January to March), TTX, PSP, and ASP values started from high in January to getting lower until March. The highest value of indole was found in squid in March. Therefore, it is worth noting the influence of high values of shellfish toxins and indole on the occurrence of food-borne diarrhea. VBN remained at a relatively low level during January to March, which might be related with a low temperature (2–14 degrees centigrade) at this time in Ningbo area. From April to June, NSP and ASP tended to range from low to high (NSP: 0.009 μg/kg to 0.082 μg/kg, ASP: 3.72 μg/kg to 8.75 μg/kg), but the other indices remained at a low level during this season (see Table 1). However, during this season, the temperature (12–28 degrees centigrade) is suitable for the growth of aquatic algae and other organisms, especially during water eutrophication, algal toxins such as domoic acid can be produced easily in nitrogen-abundant water [37,38]. These conditions can cause fish, shrimp, crab, or other shellfish to accumulate toxins, and people consuming these products may be exposed to these related toxins. July to September normally represents a hot and humid summer (21–33 degree centigrade, 80%–87% relative humidity) in Ningbo area, as well as the off-season for fishing in China. During this time, most marine products in the markets are freshly preserved by placing them in ice, except for some aquaculture products. Therefore, visceral and nearby tissues might deteriorate, which was proven by the increase of VBN and DSP in this study. The average amount of VBN was 43.45 and 50.15 mg/100 g (75% percentile 34.20 and 37.11 mg/100 g) in July and August, respectively. This analysis suggested that most aquatic products in the markets during these two months belonged to the level 3 in freshness [39]. Residents consuming these aquatic products have an increased risk of food-borne diarrhea, especially for those having a habit of eating uncooked or only short-time steamed food. The main hygienic problems of raw aquatic products included bacterial, virus and parasite infections, and toxins [40]. The epidemiologic study of Zhou suggested that eating medium raw and raw seafood were important risk factors of infectious diarrhea [41]. From October to December, at the end of the off-season fishing, live fresh aquatic products begin to be sold in large quantities in the markets again. During this period, the temperature was low (4–23 degrees centigrade) in the Ningbo area and the amount of VBN in aquatic products also decreased. However, the remarkable variety of deep-sea products coming into the market during this season, such as mackerel, crust deep-sea shrimp, natural reproductive portunid, stone crab, sea crab, snail, and striped snail, which are rare in other seasons, increased, as did the quantity of allergen and shellfish toxins contained in these aquatic products. As the monitoring indices HIS, TTX and PSP started to increase, the number of food-born diarrhea cases in this season was also increased, indicating that unhealthy aquatic products and these biotoxins may play an important role in food-borne diarrhea, especially for those having the neurological and anaphylactic symptoms [16].
In 2009 year, Yuan et al. suggested that high VBN values might be positively associated with an increase in food-borne diarrhea cases [42]. Our results indicate that, aside from VBN, DSP (in marine fish, shrimp, crab, river crab, cephalopods, and other shellfish), and NSP and ASP (in marine shrimp and marine crab) are also risk factors for food-borne diarrhea in aquatic products. The number of reported food-borne diarrhea cases was positively associated with VBN and DSP in aquatic products in Haishu, Jiangbei, Zhenhai and Beilun, and also with VBN and NSP in aquatic products in Jiangdong and Yinzhou. According to Zhao et al., the norm of DSP varied from not-detectable to 2000 μg/kg in different standard around the world [36]. The most common method of DSP detection is mouse bioassay, the detection limit of which is 0.05 MU/g (equal to 220 μg/Kg) [43]. The sensitivity of HPLC, LC-MS, and ELISA methods is higher. According to the review of Huang et al., in HPLC method, the detection rate of DSP in shellfish was low (0%–48%) in China [44]. Liu et al. reported that the detectable DSP (HPLC) ranged from 0.03 to 7.12 μg/g (30–7120 μg/kg) in 45.3% samples of sea shellfish China coast, 2001 [45]. Xu reported only 2.5% sea shellfish samples exceeded the detection limit of DSP (10 μg/kg, ELISA), and the highest DSP was 95.9 μg/kg in Ningbo area, 2012 [46]. It is in accord with our study; from January to December, the average amount of DSP range from 0.37 to 0.81 μg/kg in Ningbo area, which is also at a very low level. The reported minimal toxic dose of DSP in human was 12 MU (48 μg, 1 MU equal to 4 μg Okadaic acid) [36]. However, the causes of food-borne diarrhea are comprehensive and co-exposure, and combined effects probably exist. The reported DSP is only one of these. The association between DSP and food-borne diarrhea cases in aquatic products need to be further studied.
Indole is generated by the protein tryptophan, metabolized by the bacterial decarboxylase. As sleeve-fish exhibits higher contents of tryptophan, its content of indole can also be used as an index for evaluating the level of freshness. The annual mean content of indole in squid was very high compared with that in the other categories, with the highest value being 1023 mg/100 g in the sample of Haishu district in March. These results remind us that the squid sold in the Ningbo area was not fresh enough. Some reports indicated that the value of indole was positively associated with the degree of deterioration of shrimp [47]. But our results show that the value of indole is not positively associated with VBN in shrimp.
Ningbo is located in the eastern coastal region of China and has a wide variety of aquatic products. Residents in the Ningbo area have a habit of eating aquatic products, especially marine products. It is worth noticing that, in the Ningbo area, most of the time the aquatic products were not cooked or cooked or steamed only for a short time. During the Chinese New Year season, from January to March, residents usually consume more aquatic products. From April to June, before the off-season for fishing, there is a greater supply of aquatic products, and the consumption by residents also remains at a high level due to the relatively low prices. From July to September, although the aquatic products in the markets were not as fresh as other seasons, the prices were low for keeping consumption at a higher level. From October to December, after the fishing off-season, the price increased because of good quality. Therefore, the consumption of aquatic products by residents in Ningbo remained at a high level from January to September, which is in agreement with the occurrence of food-borne diarrhea in the same time period. In summary, we conclude that VBN, DSP, NSP, and ASP in aquatic products are the most important risk factors causing food-borne diarrhea in the Ningbo area from January to September.
As mentioned in the introduction, bacterial, parasitic, and viral factors in the aquatic products may also play important roles during the occurring of the food-borne diarrhea. Therefore, more related risk factors should be taken into consideration for analyzing the association with food-borne diarrhea incidence rates in further studies. Currently, there is no rigorous monitoring program for aquatic products in China [48]. In addition, it is well known that sustained heating couldn’t decrease the toxicity of DSP [15]. Therefore, optimal methods for effectively preventing the occurrence of food-borne diarrhea caused by unsanitary aquatic products are still lacking. Under this situation, public awareness and education might be an alternative method to help prevent and control the food-borne diarrhea in China. Dynamic monitoring of hygienic indices and publishing the results for public may also be helpful in reducing the risk of food-borne diarrhea occurring.

5. Conclusions

In present study, we found that VBN, HIS, indole in some categories of live fresh aquatic products in Ningbo markets exceeded the related standard limits, and the hygiene indices varied with the seasons, and VBN, DSP, NSP, and ASP were probable important risk factors for the occurrence of food-borne diarrhea in the population of the Ningbo area in China. And due to the comprehensive causes of food-borne diarrhea, more related risk factors should be taken into consideration and epidemiologic studies with stronger efficacy are needed in further analysis. Public health authorities should raise the awareness of the aquatic product safety.

Acknowledgments

The excellent assistance of Linda Bowman in the preparation of this article is greatly appreciated. This work was partly supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No.81273111), the Nature Science Foundation of Ningbo city (Grant No.2012A610185), the Ningbo Scientific Project (Grant No.2012C5019), the Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2015C33148 and 2014C37117) and the Scientific Innovation Team Project of Ningbo (No. 2011B82014). In addition, the author gratefully acknowledges the support of K.C. Wong Education Foundation, Hong Kong.

Author Contributions

Lijun Zhang, Jinshun Zhao and Xialu Lin conceived and designed the study; Lu Lu, Liye Shu, Jianjun Chen, Baobo Zou, Xialu Lin, Qi Zhou, and Yuanliang Gu conducted the study, collected the data and performed analysis of data. Lijun Zhang prepared the first draft of the manuscript; Xialu Lin and Jinshun Zhao provided strategic advice and assisted with editing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Z.H.; Nie, X.P.; Jiang, S.J.; Zhao, J.G.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Y.J.; Wang, D.Z. Source and profile of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in shellfish in Daya Bay, South China Sea. Mar. Environ. Res. 2011, 72, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhou, M.; Li, J.; Luckas, B.; Yu, R.; Yan, T.; Hummert, C.; Kastrup, S. A recent shellfish toxin investigation in China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1999, 39, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chan, T.Y. Ciguatera Fish Poisoning in East Asia and Southeast Asia. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 3466–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chan, T.Y. Epidemiology and clinical features of ciguatera fish poisoning in Hong Kong. Toxins 2014, 6, 2989–2997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gould, L.H.; Walsh, K.A.; Vieira, A.R.; Herman, K.; Williams, I.T.; Hall, A.J.; Cole, D. Surveillance for Foodborne Disease Outbreaks-United States, 1998–2008. MMWR Surveill Summ 2013, 62, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Dai, Y.; Yuan, B. Analysis on the food-borne disease active monitoring results in Jiangsu Province spot hospitals. China J. Pract. Med. 2010, 5, 266–267. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, J.; Liang, J.; Ke, B.; Lu, L.; He, D.; Deng, X.; Ke, C.; Huang, W.; Huang, X.; Li, S.; et al. Surveillance of foodborne dsease in Guangdong, 2012. South China J. Prev. Med. 2013, 39, 10–16. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Hwang, D.F.; Cheng, C.A.; Tsai, H.T.; Shih, D.Y.; Ko, H.C.; Yang, R.Z.; Jeng, S.S. Identification of tetrodotoxin and paralytic shellfish toxins in marine gastropods implicated in food poisoning. Shuichan Kexue 1995, 61, 675–679. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Jung, A.V.; le Cann, P.; Roig, B.; Thomas, O.; Baures, E.; Thomas, M.F. Microbial contamination detection in water resources: Interest of current optical methods, trends and needs in the context of climate change. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 4292–4310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Qiao, Q. Research progress in special food-born hazards and controls in fishery products. Xiandai Yuye Xinxi 2009, 24, 9–15. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, W.; Zhang, Z. Establishment of the shellfish toxins indices of aquatic products in the national standard of food safety. Zhongguo Weisheng Biaozhun Guanli 2011, 2, 37–41. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, C.Y.; Chou, H.N. Accumulation and depuration of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins by purple clam Hiatula rostrata Lighttoot. Toxicon 2001, 39, 1029–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yan, T.; Fu, M.; Li, J.; Yu, R.; Zhou, M. Accumulation, transformation and elimination of PSP in Mytilus edulis. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 2000, 32, 420–427. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Yang, L.; Yang, W.D.; Liu, J.S.; Jiang, T. Analysis of paralytic shellfish poisoning and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning of bivalves in seafood market of Guangzhou. J. Hyg. Res. 2006, 35, 435–438. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Nie, L.H.; Jiang, T.J.; Yang, W.D.; Liu, J.S. Analysis of paralytic shellfish poison of bivalves in seafood market in Guangzhou. J. Hyg. Res. 2005, 34, 92–94. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, T.; Xu, X.; Wei, J.; Chen, J.; Miu, R.; Huang, L.; Zhou, X.; Fu, Y.; Yan, R.; Wang, Z. Food-borne disease outbreak of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning due to toxic mussel consumption: The first recorded outbreak in China. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, J.; Li, T.; Li, X. Advances in methods for evaluating freshness of aquatic products. J. Beijing Technol. Bus. Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2010, 28, 1–8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Cai, Y.T. Study on ecological environment and health quality of aquatic products in Sansha Bay. Fujian Shuichan 2004, 1, 49–55. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, W.P.; Pan, J.M.; Liu, X.Y.; Huang, Y.X.; Zheng, M.H. Study of the content of heavy metals in the mollusks from the near-shore of Zhejiang Province. J. Mar. Sci. 2010, 28, 45–51. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Feng, H.; Qu, M.; Geng, R.; Qin, M. Distribution and drug resistance of enteric pathogenic bacteria in Fengtai, Beijing, 2010–2012. Dis. Surveill. 2013, 28, 96–100. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  21. Ruan, J.S.; Zhong, S.L.; Lin, H.X.; Yang, M.F.; Zheng, S.H.; Qian, X.M. Quality security assessment of shellfish-culture Lianjiang southeast sea area, Fujian. Fujian Shuichan 2011, 33, 12–19. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, J.Q.; Yu, X.M.; Hao, Y.B.; Zhang, P.L.; Yang, T.; Liu, H.J. Determination of clearance rate in four filtering mussel species. Shuichan Kexue 2006, 25, 4–8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin, Y.S.; Cao, W.Q.; Luo, W.X.; Guo, D.H.; Zheng, A.R.; Huang, C.J. Studies on filtration rate in four species of suspension feeding bivalves. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 2002, 21, 147–155. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shen, Q. LC-MS/MS Detecting Methods of Diarrhetic Shellfish Toxin and Paralytic Shellfish Toxin. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, S.; Li, Q.; Jin, J.; Ha, Y. Advances in conventional methods of assay of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins. J. Food Saf. Qual. 2014, 5, 763–769. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Ismail, M.; Mariod, A.; Pin, S.S. Effects of preparation methods on protein and amino acid contents of various eggs available in Malaysian local markets. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2013, 12, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Yeh, Y.H.; Hwang, D.F. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination for bile components in fish, chicken and duck. J. Chromatogr. Biomed. Appl. 2001, 751, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Si, Y.; Li, P.; Wu, J.S. Research on the quality control of both measles neutralization test and ELISA assay. Zhongguo Yimiao He Mianyi 2007, 13, 123–125. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  29. Gu, J.; Lin, Q.; Jiang, L.; Wang, F.; Zhu, Y.; Fang, X. The trend of total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN) for aquatic products. Guangzhou Chem. Ind. 2013, 41, 133–157. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, J.; Ren, J.; Sun, K. Safety of biogenic amines in foods. Food Sci. 2013, 34, 322–326. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Hou, J.; Xie, W.; Zeng, G.; Shi, Y. HPLC determination of indole in shrimp meat and its products. Phys. Test. Chem. Anal. 2015, 51, 46–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  32. Lin, Z.; Fang, G.; Lv, W.; Huang, P.; Tong, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Lin, B. The limit value of tetrodotoxin in nassariidae. China J. Food Hyg. 2012, 24, 145–148. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  33. Xu, Y.; Jiang, T.; Leng, K. The sanitray quality of farmed oyster from Shenzhen seaboard (II)-assessment on pesticide, microbe and paralytic shellfish poison. Eco. Sci. 2004, 23, 215–218. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Qiao, Q. Progress in research on aquatic products unique foodborne hazards and its control. Xiandai Yuye Xinxi 2009, 24, 9–15. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  35. FAO/WHO. Standard for live and raw bivalve moullusks. In CODEX STAN 292-2008; Standard for Live and Raw Bivalve Moullusks: Rome, Italy, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhao, X.; Ji, R. Comparative study on the management and control of diarrhetic shellfish poisons. China Trop. Med. 2006, 6, 350–354. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin, H.; Zhou, D.Q.; Yi, M.H. Aquatic Product Safety; China Light Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2010; pp. 71–95. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  38. Mulvenna, V.; Dale, K.; Priestly, B.; Mueller, U.; Humpage, A.; Shaw, G.; Allinson, G.; Falconer, I. Health risk assessment for cyanobacterial toxins in seafood. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhou, D.Q.; Ma, J.J.; Xu, J.J. Aquatic product freshness evaluation method research progress. J. Laiyang Agric. Coll. 2004, 21, 312–315. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  40. Qin, P.Z. The hygiene problem of raw aquatic products (review). China J. Food Hyg. 2000, 12, 40–43. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhou, H.F.; Sun, H.Y.; Chen, Y.H.; Ling, J. The risk factor research of infectious diarrhea. Dis. Surveill. 2002, 17, 92–95. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  42. Yuan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Shu, L.; Chen, J. A study on the correlation between chemical compound and biological toxins of cephalopod marine products and food-borne diarrhea. Zhejiang Prev. Med. 2014, 26, 377–380, 394. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, R.; Lan, W.S.; Ou, X.L.; He, X.Y.; Zhu, J.Z.; Liu, H.; Shi, X.J. Advances in diarrhetic shellfish poisoning research. In Proceedings of the 2013 Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences Academic Annual Conference, Beijing, China, 1 August 2013; Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences Academic: Kunming, China, 2013; pp. 6606–6614. (In Chinese)[Google Scholar]
  44. Huang, Y.L.; Li, X.Z.; Wu, X.Q.; Pang, Y.F.; Wei, X.X.; Huang, G.Q.; Tong, G.X. The investigation of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning contaminated shellfish. Shuichan Keji Qingbao 2010, 37, 21–24. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, R.Y.; Fu, Y.N.; Guan, D.M. Determination of diarrhetie shellfish poisoning and amnesic shellfish poisoning of sea shellfish by HPLC in China Coast. Mar. Environ. Sci. 2004, 23, 70–72. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  46. Xu, F.F.; Wu, B.L.; Huang, Y.Q.; Wang, Y.Y.; Cai, Y. Analysis of diarrhetic shellfish poisons in seafood market of Ningbo. China J. Health Lab. Technol. 2013, 23, 3394–3395. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  47. Mendes, R.; Huidobro, A.; Caballero, E. Indole levels in deepwater pink shrimp (Parapenaeus longirostris) from the Portuguese coast. Effects of temperature abuse. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2002, 214, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chung, P.; Chuang, S.; Tsang, T. Consumption of viscera as the most important risk factor in the largest outbreak of shellfish poisoning in Hong Kong, 2005. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2006, 37, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Lu, L.; Shu, L.; Chen, J.; Zou, B.; Zhou, Q.; Gu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Lin, X. Association between the Hygiene Index Values of Live Fresh Aquatic Products and Food-Borne Diarrhea in the Population of the Ningbo Area in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 9154-9168. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809154

AMA Style

Zhang L, Lu L, Shu L, Chen J, Zou B, Zhou Q, Gu Y, Zhao J, Lin X. Association between the Hygiene Index Values of Live Fresh Aquatic Products and Food-Borne Diarrhea in the Population of the Ningbo Area in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2015; 12(8):9154-9168. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Lijun, Lu Lu, Liye Shu, Jianjun Chen, Baobo Zou, Qi Zhou, Yuanliang Gu, Jinshun Zhao, and Xialu Lin. 2015. "Association between the Hygiene Index Values of Live Fresh Aquatic Products and Food-Borne Diarrhea in the Population of the Ningbo Area in China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12, no. 8: 9154-9168. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809154

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop