Next Article in Journal
Association of Serum Free Fatty Acids with Hypertension and Insulin Resistance among Rural Uyghur Adults in Far Western China
Next Article in Special Issue
Health-Related Quality of Life of the Roma in Greece: The Role of Socio-Economic Characteristics and Housing Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Ecosystem Functions Connecting Contributions from Ecosystem Services to Human Wellbeing in a Mangrove System in Northern Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Health Status and Risk Factors among Adolescent Survivors One Month after the 2014 Ludian Earthquake
Article

The Impact of Different Degrees of Feedback on Physical Activity Levels: A 4-Week Intervention Study

Department of Kinesiology, Physical Activity, Sports & Health Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven 3001, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Academic Editor: Tetsuji Yamada
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(6), 6561-6581; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606561
Received: 18 March 2015 / Revised: 26 May 2015 / Accepted: 3 June 2015 / Published: 9 June 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Behaviors and Public Health)
Assessing levels of physical activity (PA) and providing feedback about these levels might have an effect on participant’s PA behavior. This study discusses the effect of different levels of feedback—from minimal to use of a feedback display and coach—on PA over a 4-week intervention period. PA was measured at baseline, during and immediately after the intervention. Participants (n = 227) were randomly assigned to a Minimal Intervention Group (MIG-no feedback), Pedometer Group (PG-feedback on steps taken), Display Group (DG-feedback on steps, minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity and energy expenditure) or Coaching Group (CoachG-same as DG with need-supportive coaching). Two-way ANCOVA showed no significant Group × Time interaction effect for the different PA variables between the MIG and PG. Also no differences emerged between PG and DG. As hypothesized, CoachG had higher PA values throughout the intervention compared with DG. Self-monitoring using a pedometer resulted in more steps compared with a no-feedback condition at the start of the intervention. However, adding individualized coaching seems necessary to increase the PA level until the end of the intervention. View Full-Text
Keywords: physical activity assessment; motion sensors; exercise psychology; health promotion physical activity assessment; motion sensors; exercise psychology; health promotion
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Van Hoye, K.; Boen, F.; Lefevre, J. The Impact of Different Degrees of Feedback on Physical Activity Levels: A 4-Week Intervention Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 6561-6581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606561

AMA Style

Van Hoye K, Boen F, Lefevre J. The Impact of Different Degrees of Feedback on Physical Activity Levels: A 4-Week Intervention Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2015; 12(6):6561-6581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606561

Chicago/Turabian Style

Van Hoye, Karen; Boen, Filip; Lefevre, Johan. 2015. "The Impact of Different Degrees of Feedback on Physical Activity Levels: A 4-Week Intervention Study" Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12, no. 6: 6561-6581. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606561

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop