Next Article in Journal
Particulate Matter Exposure in a Police Station Located near a Highway
Previous Article in Journal
Association of Exposure to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Radiation (RF-EMFR) Generated by Mobile Phone Base Stations with Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Open AccessArticle

Greywater Disposal Practices in Northern Botswana—The Silent Spring?

Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
Center for African Resources: Animals, Communities and Land Use, Kasane, Botswana, South Africa
Occoquan Watershed Monitoring Laboratory, Virginia Tech, Manassas, WV 20110, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Miklas Scholz
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(11), 14529-14540;
Received: 14 September 2015 / Accepted: 6 October 2015 / Published: 13 November 2015
Disposal of greywater is a neglected challenge facing rapidly growing human populations. Here, we define greywater as wastewater that originates from household activities (e.g., washing dishes, bathing, and laundry) but excludes inputs from the toilet. Pollutants in greywater can include both chemical and biological contaminates that can significantly impact human, animal, and environmental health under certain conditions. We evaluate greywater disposal practices in nonsewered, low-income residential areas in Kasane (264 dwellings/ha), Kazungula (100 du/ha), and Lesoma (99 du/ha) villages in Northern Botswana through household surveys (n = 30 per village). Traditional pit latrines were the dominant form of sanitation (69%, n = 90, 95% CI, 59%–79%) while 14% of households did not have access to onsite sanitation (95% CI 0%–22%). While greywater disposal practices varied across villages, respondents in all sites reported dumping greywater into the pit latrine. Frequency varied significantly across villages with the highest level reported in Kasane, where residential density was greatest (p < 0.014, χ2 = 9.13, 61% (n = 23, 95% CI 41%–81%), Kazungula 41% (n = 22, 95% CI 20%–62%), Lesoma 13% (95% CI 0%–29%). Disposal of greywater in this manner was reported to limit contamination of the household compound and reduce odors, as well as pit latrine fecal levels. Some respondents reported being directed by local health authorities to dispose of greywater in this manner. Environmentally hazardous chemicals were also dumped directly into the pit latrine to reduce odors. With high household to pit latrine ratios particularly in rental properties (4.2 households, SD = 3.32, range = 15 units, average household size 5.3, SD = 4.4), these greywater and pit latrine management approaches can significantly alter hydraulic loading and leaching of chemicals, microorganisms, and parasites. This can dramatically expand the environmental footprint of pit latrines and greywater, increasing pollution of soil, ground, and surface water resources. Challenges in greywater disposal and pit latrines must be addressed with urgency as health behaviors directed at minimizing negative aspects may amplify the environmental impacts of both greywater and pit latrine excreta. View Full-Text
Keywords: sanitation; public health; greywater; pit latrine; ground water contamination; Botswana; pollution; health behavior sanitation; public health; greywater; pit latrine; ground water contamination; Botswana; pollution; health behavior
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Alexander, K.A.; Godrej, A. Greywater Disposal Practices in Northern Botswana—The Silent Spring? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 14529-14540.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop