Next Article in Journal
Neuroprotective and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Undaria pinnatifida Fucoidan In Vivo—A Proteomic Investigation
Previous Article in Journal
Bioassay-Guided Procedure Coupled with HR-ESIMS Dereplication for Isolation of Antiproliferative Bromo-Tyramine Derivative from Aplysina cauliformis
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro and In Silico Studies on the Anti-H1N1 Activity of Bioactive Compounds from Marine-Derived Streptomyces ardesiacus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Polyketides with a 6/6/6/6 Oxaphenalene Pyranone Skeleton from Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. HDN150000

1
Key Laboratory of Marine Drugs, Chinese Ministry of Education, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
2
Laboratory for Marine Drugs and Bioproducts, Qingdao Marine Science and Technology Center, Qingdao 266237, China
3
Sanya Oceanographic Institute, Ocean University of China, Sanya 572025, China
4
Marine Biomedical Research Institute of Qingdao, Qingdao 266101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2025, 23(5), 188; https://doi.org/10.3390/md23050188
Submission received: 27 March 2025 / Revised: 23 April 2025 / Accepted: 24 April 2025 / Published: 27 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Streptomyces-Derived Natural Products 2024)

Abstract

:
Three new structures named naphpyrone I–K (13) that contain a 6/6/6/6 oxaphenalene pyranone skeleton were isolated and purified from a marine-derived Streptomyces sp. HDN155000. Their chemical structures, including configurations, were elucidated by extensive NMR, MS, single-crystal X-ray diffraction, theoretical NMR calculations, DP4+ probability analysis, and ECD analyses. Naphpyrone K (3) showed cytotoxic activities against L-02, K562, NCI-H446/EP, MDA-MB-231, and NCI-H446 cancer cells with IC50 values of 5.13, 3.34, 2.50, 2.61, and 2.20 μM, respectively. These findings highlight the potential for screening and developing therapeutic drugs from aromatic polyketides derived from marine actinobacteria.

1. Introduction

Marine actinobacteria, a branch of actinobacteria, is widely distributed in various ecosystems in the marine environment, including seafloor sediments, rock surfaces, and seawater [1]. Compared to terrestrial actinobacteria, marine actinobacteria are more tolerant of hypoxia, oligonutrition, high salt, high pressure, low temperature, and other unusual living circumstances, which is closely related to their long-term survival in special environments [2]. This group of microorganisms exhibits a complex and elaborate cycle of morphological differentiation. Under suitable environmental and nutrient conditions, the mycelium of marine actinobacteria exhibits multinucleate, branched, slender, and non-septate characteristics [3]. Morphological differentiation in marine actinobacteria is frequently accompanied by complex physiological changes and the generation of a large number of metabolites [4,5]. In recent years, a variety of structurally diverse secondary metabolites with unique bioactivities originating from marine actinomycetes have been exploited [6,7]. Subramani summarized 167 new bioactive compounds produced by marine actinobacteria with antimicrobial, antitumor, anthelmintic, and antimalarial activities, of which the genus Microcystis is the richest source of chemical diversity and unique bioactivities [8]. Chen summarized 536 compounds isolated from marine actinomycetes, of which alkaloids (37%), polyketides (33%), and peptides (15%) accounted for the largest proportion, and Streptomyces (68%), Aeromonas (6%), and Nocardia (3%) were the major producers of secondary metabolites [9]. Some researchers have even begun to focus on the effect of marine Streptomyces secondary metabolites on drug-resistant bacteria. Cho extracted a new chromomycin from the marine-derived Streptomyces sp. MBTI36 with potent antimicrobial activity against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [10]. In addition, a study has isolated a novel tirandamycin with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis inhibitory activity from the marine Streptomyces sp. 307-9 [11]. These findings have the potential to alleviate the antibiotic resistance crisis and demonstrate marine actinomycetes as a promising resource for lead compound discovery and development.
In the ongoing process of our group’s research for natural products with excellent bioactivity from marine-derived microorganisms, a strain of Streptomyces sp. HDN150000 isolated from a marine sediment sample caught our attention. The OSMAC strategy (one strain–many compounds) was employed to cultivate Streptomyces sp. HDN150000, resulting in compounds with significantly different UV absorption profiles in M1 liquid media compared to other conditions. Under the guidance of HPLC-UV and LC-MS, six compounds with a 6/6/6/6 oxaphenalene pyranone skeleton, including three novels named naphpyrone I–K (13), were isolated and purified (Figure 1). Among them, compound 3 showed cytotoxic activities against cells L-02, K562, NCI-H446/EP, MDA-MB-231, and NCI-H446 with IC50 values of 5.13, 3.34, 2.50, 2.61, and 2.20 μM, respectively. Details of the isolation, structure elucidation, and bioactivities of these compounds are reported herein.

2. Results

Streptomyces sp. HDN15000 was isolated from a sediment sample collected from the South China Sea (125°28.550′ E, 29°1.618′ N). A comprehensive study of the metabolites produced by this Streptomyces species was carried out on various culture conditions. When culturing Streptomyces HDN150000 in M1 liquid medium, more differential peaks appeared (Figure 2).
To specifically identify the structures, we processed a larger-scale fermentation of this strain, and ethyl acetate extraction of the fermentation broth yielded 18.3 g crude extract. Subsequently, following HPLC results, the crude extracts were then separated stepwise using repeated silica gel column chromatography, Sephadex LH-20, and semipreparative HPLC to yield compounds 16 (Figure 1).
Compound 1 was isolated as a white powder. The chemical formula was determined to be C17H14O4, supported by the cationic molecular ion peak at m/z 283.0962 [M + H]+ in the high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HRESIMS) (Figure S9), which signifies eleven degrees of unsaturation. The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 displayed two methyls (δH 2.13 and δH 1.62), one methylene (δH 3.05 and 2.68), five aromatic methines (δH 8.96, d, J = 8.8 Hz; δH 7.48, m; δH 6.88, d, J = 7.2 Hz; δH 6.22, s; δH 6.41, s) (Table 1). The 13C NMR spectrum combined with the HSQC spectrum reveals the existence of two methyls, one methylene, five protonated sp2 carbons, and nine non-protonated carbons (Table 1). The planar structure of 1 was established through a detailed analysis of its 2D NMR data. Firstly, the 1H-1H COSY correlations from H-5 (δH 8.98, d, J = 8.8 Hz) through H-6 (δH 7.48 m) to H-7 (δH 6.88, d, J = 7.2 Hz) suggest the existence of the 1,2,3-trisubstituted benzene ring (ring D). Further analysis of the key HMBC correlations from H-5 to C-7b/C-4a, from H-6 to C-7a/C-4b, and from H-7 to C-8/C-7b/C-5 identified the ring D and extended to the rings C and B. The HMBC correlations from H-12 to C-8/C-9, from H-8 to C-9/C-7a/C-7b, and from H-11 to C-7b/C-10a/C-4a/C-11a delineated rings C and B. Finally, the HMBC correlations from H-13 to C-2/C-3, from H-3 to C-4a/C-4/C-2, and from 2-OH (δH 7.12) to C-13/C-2 identified the ring A and its propagation to the ring B. Thus, the planar structure of compound 1 possessing 6/6/6/6 oxaphenalene pyranone was determined (Figure 3).
The absolute configuration of compound 1 was confirmed as 2S supported by the X-ray diffraction (Figure 4).
Compound 2 was obtained as a white solid powder. The molecular formula C16H12O5 deduced by HR-ESIMS, suggests 11 degrees of unsaturation. 1H and 13C spectra reveal that compound 2 contains one methyl, two methylenes, one sp3 methine, three sp2 methine, and nine non-protonated carbons (including two carbonyl and seven aromatic quaternary carbons). Detailed 2D NMR analysis showed that compound 2 has a similar 6/6/6/6 system with compound 1 except that the dehydration of C-2 and C-3 of the ring A to form a double bond, which can be determined by the HMBC correlations from H-12 (δH 2.34) to C-2 (δC 165.3) and C-3 (δC 111.3). The C-5 (δC 36.7), C-6 (δC 63.2), and C-7 (δC 36.7) of the ring D changed from sp2 to sp3 carbon signals determined from the 1H-1H COSY correlations of H-5/H-6/H-7. Further consideration of the C-6 as the methenyl carbon signal suggests the presence of hydroxyl substitution [12]. Another difference lies in the low-field chemical shift of C-9 (δC 159.1) in combination with the HR-ESIMS data at m/z 285.0755 [M + H]+, identifying C-9 as a carbonyl carbon [13,14]. Thus, the planar structure of 2 was determined (Figure 3). To determine the absolute configuration of 2, ECD calculations of the possible configurations (6S*)-2 and (6R*)-2 were performed. Finally, the good agreement between the experimental and calculated ECD curves evidenced that the absolute configuration of 2 is 6R (Figure 5A).
Compound 3 was separated as a white amorphous solid powder. The molecular formula of C19H16O5 is established by the HRESIMS data (m/z 325.1073 [M + H]+, calcd. 325.1071). The 1H NMR spectrum of 3 showed two methyls (δH 1.13 and δH 2.53), two sp3 methines (δH 4.00 and δH 3.91), six sp2 aromatic methines (δH 6.22; δH 9.48; δH 7.60; δH 7.16; δH 6.43; δH 6.88) (Table 1). The 13C NMR spectrum reveals the existence of two methyls, eight methines, and nine non-protonated carbons (including a carbonyl and eight non-protonated sp2 carbons) (Table 1). 2D NMR showed that compound 3 has a 6/6/6/6/6 ring system structure similar to compound 1, except that C-2 (δC 163.4) and C-3 (δC 112.2) are dehydrated to form a double bond, in addition the substitution at C-9 (δC 156.3) with a propylene glycol side chain can be further determined by the HMBC correlations from H-14 (δH 1.13) to C-13 (δC 67.4) and C 12 (δC 74.1), from H-13 (δH 3.91) to C-9, and from H-12 (δH 4.00) to C-8 (δC 104.2), C-9, and C-13. At this point, the planar structure of compound 3 was determined.
Compound 3 has four possible configurations (12S*,13R*)-3, (12S*,13S*)-3, (12R*,13R*)-3, and (12R*,13S*)-3. To determine the relative structure of 3, the theoretical NMR calculations at PCM(DMSO)-mPW1PW91/6-311+G(d,p)//B3LYP/6-31G(d)-GD3BJ level and DP4+ probability analyses were employed on two possible configurations (12S*,13R*)-3 and (12S*,13S*)-3, and the calculations messages suggested that (12S*,13R*)-3 was the correct relative structure (Table S1). Subsequent ECD calculations were performed and compared to the experimental ECD curves to determine the absolute conformation of 3 as 12S,13R (Figure 5B).
Based on the comparison of NMR and MS data with those reported in the literature, the known compounds isolated in this study were identified as naphpyrone D (4), naphpyrone B (5), and naphpyrone C (6) [15].
All new compounds were evaluated for cytotoxicity against L-02, MDA-MB-231, K562, ASPC-1, NCI-H446, and NCI-H446/EP cell lines in vitro. Adriamycin was used as the positive control. As a result, compound 3 showed cytotoxic activity against cells L-02, K562, NCI-H446/EP, MDA-MB-231, and NCI-H446 with IC50 values of 5.13, 3.34, 2.50, 2.61, and 2.20 μM, respectively (Table S2–S6).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

Streptomyces sp. HDN150000 genomes were acquired using methods previously described in the literature [16].
An Agilent DD2-500 spectrometer was used to obtain NMR spectra, with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal standard. UV-vis spectra were recorded on the UFLC system (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). HRESIMS spectra were measured on a Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). Specific rotations were obtained on a JASCO P-1020 digital polarimeter. The ECD spectra were obtained using a JASCO J-715 spectropolarimeter (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). Column chromatography (CC) was performed using silica gel (300–400 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Ltd., Qingdao, China), SiliaSphere C18 (Octadecylsilyl, ODS) monomeric (SiliCycle Inc., Québec City, Canada, 50 μm, 120 A), and Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). MPLC was performed on a Waters 1526. HPLC spectra were collected with an ODS column (YMC-Pack ODS-A, 10 × 250 mm, 5 μm, 3 mL min−1, YMC Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan).

3.2. Materials and Culture Conditions

Streptomyces sp. HDN155000 was isolated from a marine sediment sample collected from the South China Sea at coordinates 125°28.550′ E and 29°1.618′ N. The strain was identified through genome sequencing and submitted to GenBank (No. OP001709) [17]. Wild type and their mutant strains were cultivated for 8 days at 28 °C on MS plates containing 2% soya bean flour, 2% mannitol, and 1.8% agar. For genome extraction, the strain was inoculated into 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 50 mL of BF1 liquid medium (1% glucose, 1% tryptone, 2% starch, 0.5% yeast extract, and 0.5% CaCO3) for 2 days.

3.3. Fermentation and LC/LC-MS Analysis

For small-scale analysis, all actinobacteria were cultured for 8 days at 28 °C in M1 medium (4 g/L yeast extract, 2 g/L peptone, 10 g/L starch), TSB medium (1.7% tryptone, 0.3% peptone, 0.25% glucose, 0.25% KH2PO4, and 0.3% NaCl) and BF1 medium after which the culture products were collected and extracted by ethyl acetate at least three times. The organic phase from the three extractions was evaporated, and the residue was redissolved in 200 μL MeOH. Then, 50 μL of dissolved extract was injected for high-performance liquid chromatography–photodiode array detection–mass spectrometry (HPLC-DAD-MS) analysis (C18 column, Shimadzu, 4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm, 1 mL/min); the samples were separated on a linear gradient of 5–100% acetonitrile (MeOH) in water (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) for 50 min at a flow rate of 1 mL/min, and HPLC analysis revealed a significant change in metabolite production in the mutant strain.
For compound separation, the selected strain was incubated in M1 medium at 28 °C for 2 days as a seed solution. Then, cultured seed solutions were transferred to 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of M1 medium at 2% inoculum (total 18 L) for further fermentation. The broth was extracted three times with ethyl acetate to provide a total of 55 L of extract solution. The organic phase was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford a crude residue (18.3 g).

3.4. Extraction, Isolation, and Purification

To identify secondary metabolites, under the guidance of HPLC analysis, the crude extracts were separated with a step gradient elution of MeOH-H2O, providing eight subfractions (Fr.1–Fr.8, 30% to 100%). The compounds are mainly concentrated in Fr.3–Fr.5. Fr.3 was purified by semi-preparative HPLC (41:59 MeOH-H2O, 3 mL/min) to generate compound 1 (5.4 mg, tR = 21.3 min). Fr.3 was purified by a semi-preparative C18 HPLC column (55:45 MeOH-H2O), producing compound 3 (3.8 mg, tR = 14.7 min) and Fr.4.1. This subfraction was separated with preparative C18 HPLC column (50:50 MeOH-H2O) to yield compounds 2 (4.3 mg, tR = 14.7 min) and 5 (3.4 mg, tR = 18.5 min). Fr.5 was applied to a Sephadex LH-20 column and eluted with methanol, obtaining compound 4 (8.2 mg). Fr.5 was purified through semipreparative HPLC (66:34 MeOH-H2O, 3 mL/min) to produce compound 6 (9.0 mg, tR = 13.3 min).
Naphpyrone I (1): white powder, [ α ] D 25 –32.6 (c 0.03, CH3OH); UV (DAD) λmax 210 nm, 226 nm, 242 nm, 254 nm, 277 nm, 242 nm, and 399 nm; CD (MeOH); λmax (∆ε) 210 (–12.46), 218 (+3.21), 226 (–1.78), 232 (–0.36), 240 (–2.09), and 263 (+2.35); 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 283.0962 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C17H15O4+, 283.0965).
Naphpyrone J (2): white solid powder, [ α ] D 25 19.5 (c 0.03, CH3OH); UV (DAD) λmax 210 nm, 225 nm, 258 nm, 263 nm, 269 nm, 274 nm, 279 nm, and 329 nm; CD (MeOH); λmax (∆ε) 225 (–5.08), 266 (+1.81), 315 (–0.17), and 353 (+1.66); 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 285.0755 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C16H13O5+, 285.0757).
Naphpyrone K (3): white amorphous solid powder, [ α ] D 25 –20.3 (c 0.03, CH3OH); UV (DAD) λmax 238 nm, 242 nm, 258 nm, 270 nm, 274 nm, and 274 nm; CD (MeOH); λmax (∆ε) 224 (+2.16), 244 (+8.21), 251 (+1.66), 356 (+3.36), and 369 (–2.82); 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; positive ion HRESIMS m/z 325.1073 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C19H17O7+, 325.1071).

3.5. X-Ray Crystallographic Analysis of Naphpyrone I

Naphpyrone I (1) was analyzed by X-ray diffraction on Cu Kα radiation. Compound 1 was concentrated in vacuo and redissolved in 1.5 mL CH3OH that was transferred in a 2 mL clear screw autosampler vial. The lid with holes was then closely screwed on the vial, and white needle-like crystals were obtained after seven nights at room temperature.
Crystal Data: C17H14O4 (M =282.28 g/mol): trigonal, space group R-3 (no. 148), a = 36.3042(8) Å, c = 5.5043(2) Å, V = 6282.7(4) Å3, Z = 18, T = 120.00(10) K, μ (Cu Kα) = 0.789 mm−1, Dcalc = 1.343 g/cm3, 7569 reflections measured (4.868° ≤ 2Θ ≤ 145.992°), 2693 unique (Rint = 0.0599, Rsigma = 0.0589) which were used in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0530 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 was 0.1540 (all data).
The crystallographic data have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as CCDC 2434219.

3.6. NMR and ECD Calculations

Conformational searches were conducted using Spartan′14, based on the MMFF force fields [18]. Compounds 1, 2, and 3 were further optimized with DFT calculations at the B3LYP/6-31G(d)-GD3BJ level, utilizing the Gaussian 16 program package [19]. Gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) calculations of 13C NMR of conformers were accomplished by DFT at the mPW1PW91/6-311+G(d,p) level with the PCM model in DMSO. The calculated NMR data of these conformers were averaged according to the Boltzmann distribution theory and their relative Gibbs free energy. The 13C NMR chemical shifts for TMS were also calculated by the same procedures and used as the reference. After calculation, the experimental and calculated data were evaluated by the improved probability DP4+ method [20]. The ECD was calculated using time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) at a B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level in methanol with the IEFPCM model [21]. The calculated ECD curves were all generated using the SpecDis 1.71 program package, and the calculated ECD data of all conformers were Boltzmann averaged using Gibbs free energy [22].

3.7. Cytotoxicity Assay

The cytotoxic assay involved six human cancer cell lines: K562 (using the MTT method), L-02, MDA-MB-231, ASPC-1, NCI-H446, and NCI-H446/EP (using the SRB method). Adriamycin (ADM) was used as a positive control. The detailed procedures for biological testing were conducted as previously stated [23]. The cancer cell lines were purchased from the National Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures of China (Shanghai).

4. Conclusions

Marine actinobacteria can produce structurally diverse secondary metabolites with unique biological activities, making them a new resource for the discovery of antibiotics. Six compounds containing a 6/6/6/6 oxaphenalene pyranone skeleton were isolated and determined from Streptomyces sp. HDN150000, which was isolated from a marine sediment sample collected from the South China Sea. Among them, compound 3 showed cytotoxic activity against cells L-02, K562, NCI-H446/EP, MDA-MB-231, and NCI-H446, providing an alternative lead compound for medical study. Our study highlights the potential of mining secondary metabolites from marine actinobacteria for screening and utilization of therapeutic molecules.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md23050188/s1, Figure S1: Separation process of Streptomyces. sp. HDN150000 mutant strain extract in M1; Figure S2: UV absorption of compounds 1-6. Figure S3: Two relative configurations 3a and 3b; Figure S4: Calculated and experimental ECD spectra of 3; Figures S5–S10: NMR and HRESIMS spectra of compound 1; Figures S11–S16: NMR and HRESIMS spectra of compound 2; Figures S17–S22: NMR and HRESIMS spectra of compound 3; Table S1: DP4+ analysis results of 3a (Isomer 1) and 3b (Isomer 2); Tables S2–S6: Cytotoxicity assay of novel compound 3.

Author Contributions

The contributions of the respective authors are as follows: X.Z. drafted the work and performed isolation and structural elucidation of the extract. X.Z. and F.Z. performed the NMR and ECD calculations of the compounds. Biological evaluations were performed by W.W., X.R., T.Z., and Q.C., and D.L. checked the procedures of this work. G.Z. designed the project and contributed to the critical reading of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32370061), the Qingdao Marine Science and Technology Center (2022QNLM030003-1, 2022QNLM030003-2), the Taishan Scholar Youth Expert Program in Shandong Province (tsqn 202103153), the Major Basic Research Programs of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2023ZD29), and the Hainan Provincial Joint Project of Sanya Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City (2021CXLH0012).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data given in this research are available in this article and the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank Weishan Wang (Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for providing the point mutation rpsL (K88E) and rpoB (S433L) gene vectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jose, P.A.; Jebakumar, S.R. Non-streptomycete actinomycetes nourish the current microbial antibiotic drug discovery. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ngamcharungchit, C.; Chaimusik, N.; Panbangred, W.; Euanorasetr, J.; Intra, B. Bioactive metabolites from terrestrial and marine actinomycetes. Molecules 2023, 28, 5915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xue, Z.; Wang, S.; Sun, J.; Wang, F.; Zhou, J. Research progress on morphological differentiation and secondary metabolite biosynthesis of Streptomyces. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2021, 61, 3870–3886. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, Y.; Tan, H. Biosynthesis and molecular regulation of secondary metabolites in microorganisms. Sci. China Life Sci. 2017, 60, 935–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Z.; Sun, W.; Hu, Z.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H. Marine Streptomyces-Derived Novel Alkaloids Discovered in the Past Decade. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Konig, G.M.; Kehraus, S.; Seibert, S.F.; Abdel-Lateff, A.; Muller, D. Natural products from marine organisms and their associated microbes. Chembiochem 2006, 7, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hu, Y.; Chen, S.; Yang, F.; Dong, S. Marine indole alkaloids—Isolation, structure and bioactivities. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Subramani, R.; Sipkema, D. Marine Rare Actinomycetes: A Promising Source of Structurally Diverse and Unique Novel Natural Products. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, J.; Xu, L.; Zhou, Y.; Han, B. Natural Products from Actinomycetes Associated with Marine Organisms. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cho, E.; Kwon, O.S.; Chung, B.; Lee, J.; Sun, J.; Shin, J.; Oh, K.B. Antibacterial Activity of Chromomycins from a Marine-Derived Streptomyces microflavus. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, X.; Li, Z.; Du, L.; Chlipala, G.E.; Lopez, P.C.; Zhang, W.; Sherman, D.H.; Li, S. Identification of an unexpected shunt pathway product provides new insights into tirandamycin biosynthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 5919–5923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, X.; Zhang, F.; Li, C.; Li, J.; Xu, X.; Zhu, T.; Che, Q.; Li, D.; Zhang, G. Heterologous Expression of Type II PKS Gene Cluster Leads to Diversified Angucyclines in Streptomyces albus J1074. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, T.S.; Khosla, C.; Tang, Y. Engineered biosynthesis of aklanonic acid analogues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12254–12262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kharel, M.K.; Pahari, P.; Lian, H.; Rohr, J. Enzymatic total synthesis of rabelomycin, an angucycline group antibiotic. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2814–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, X.; Xu, X.; Zhou, L.; Ma, C.; Wang, W.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, D.; Che, Q.; et al. Naphpyrones A-H, Antibacterial Aromatic Polyketides Isolated from the Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2)/spi1 ΔspiH3. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. McDaniel, R.; Ebert-Khosla, S.; Hopwood, D.A.; Khosla, C. Engineered biosynthesis of novel polyketides. Science 1993, 262, 1546–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, X.; Chang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, F.; Ma, C.; Che, Q.; Zhu, T.; Pfeifer, B.A.; Zhang, G.; et al. Biosynthesis of Atypical Angucyclines Unveils New Ring Rearrangement Reactions Catalyzed by Flavoprotein Monooxygenases. Org. Lett. 2024, 26, 7489–7494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, F.; Wang, W.; Wang, F.; Zhou, L.; Luo, G.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, T.; Che, Q.; Li, D. Polyketide Derivatives from the Mangrove-Derived Fungus Penicillium sp. HDN15-312. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision B.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. Marcarino, M.O.; Cicetti, S.; Zanardi, M.M.; Sarotti, A.M. A critical review on the use of DP4+ in the structural elucidation of natural products: The good, the bad and the ugly. A practical guide. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2022, 39, 58–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, F.; Ma, C.; Che, Q.; Zhu, T.; Zhang, G.; Li, D. Extending the Structural Diversity of Labdane Diterpenoids from Marine-Derived Fungus Talaromyces sp. HDN151403 Using Heterologous Expression. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bruhn, T.; Schaumlöffel, A.; Hemberger, Y.; Bringmann, G. SpecDis: Quantifying the comparison of calculated and experimental electronic circular dichroism spectra. Chirality 2013, 25, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, X.; Zhang, F.; Zhou, L.; Chang, Y.; Che, Q.; Zhu, T.; Li, D.; Zhang, G. Overexpression of Global Regulator SCrp Leads to the Discovery of New Angucyclines in Streptomyces sp. XS-16. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of isolated compounds 16.
Figure 1. Structures of isolated compounds 16.
Marinedrugs 23 00188 g001
Figure 2. HPLC analysis of crude extracts of Streptomyces sp. HDN15000 in M1, TSB, and BF1 media.
Figure 2. HPLC analysis of crude extracts of Streptomyces sp. HDN15000 in M1, TSB, and BF1 media.
Marinedrugs 23 00188 g002
Figure 3. 1H-1H COSY and key HMBC correlations of 13.
Figure 3. 1H-1H COSY and key HMBC correlations of 13.
Marinedrugs 23 00188 g003
Figure 4. ORTEP drawing for crystal structure of 1.
Figure 4. ORTEP drawing for crystal structure of 1.
Marinedrugs 23 00188 g004
Figure 5. (A) Calculated and experimental ECD spectra of 2. (B) Calculated and experimental ECD spectra of 3.
Figure 5. (A) Calculated and experimental ECD spectra of 2. (B) Calculated and experimental ECD spectra of 3.
Marinedrugs 23 00188 g005
Table 1. 1H (500 MHZ) and 13C (125 MHZ) spectroscopic data for 13 in DMSO-d6.
Table 1. 1H (500 MHZ) and 13C (125 MHZ) spectroscopic data for 13 in DMSO-d6.
No123
δC TypeδH (J in Hz)δC TypeδH (J in Hz)δC typeδH (J in Hz)
2101.5 qC 165.3 qC 163.4 qC
349.3 CH23.05 day (15.9)111.3 CH6.17 s112.2 CH6.22 day (1.0)
2.68 day (15.9)
4190.6 qC 178.6 qC 177.7 qC
4a106.4 qC 117.7 qC 110.5 qC
4b132.6 qC 140.2 qC 131.6 qC
5121.2 CH8.96 day (8.8)36.7 CH23.69 m122.7 CH9.48 day (8.8, 1.0)
3.64 m
6131.8 CH7.48 m63.2 CH4.15 m131.3 CH7.60 m
7115.5 CH6.88 day (7.2)36.7 CH2.97 m118.0 CH7.16 day (7.3, 1.0)
2.80 m
7a129.4 qC 153.7 qC 129.2 qC
7b117.2 qC 114.2 qC 119.7 qC
8104.4 CH6.22 s111.9 CH6.32 s104.2 CH6.43 brs
9152.3 qC 159.1 qC 156.3 qC
10a158.6 qC 155.2 qC 156.9 qC
1198.8 CH6.41 s103.1 CH7.41 s97.4 CH6.88 s
11a162.9 qC 158.8 qC 159.4 qC
1218.7 CH32.13 s19.5 CH32.34 s74.1 CH4.00 day (4.7)
1327.3 CH31.62 s 67.4 CH3.91 m
14 19.3 CH31.13 day (6.4)
15 19.2 CH32.35 s
2-OH 7.12 s
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Zhang, F.; Wang, W.; Ren, X.; Zhu, T.; Che, Q.; Li, D.; Zhang, G. Polyketides with a 6/6/6/6 Oxaphenalene Pyranone Skeleton from Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. HDN150000. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23050188

AMA Style

Zhang X, Zhang F, Wang W, Ren X, Zhu T, Che Q, Li D, Zhang G. Polyketides with a 6/6/6/6 Oxaphenalene Pyranone Skeleton from Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. HDN150000. Marine Drugs. 2025; 23(5):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23050188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaoting, Falei Zhang, Wenxue Wang, Xingtao Ren, Tianjiao Zhu, Qian Che, Dehai Li, and Guojian Zhang. 2025. "Polyketides with a 6/6/6/6 Oxaphenalene Pyranone Skeleton from Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. HDN150000" Marine Drugs 23, no. 5: 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23050188

APA Style

Zhang, X., Zhang, F., Wang, W., Ren, X., Zhu, T., Che, Q., Li, D., & Zhang, G. (2025). Polyketides with a 6/6/6/6 Oxaphenalene Pyranone Skeleton from Marine-Derived Streptomyces sp. HDN150000. Marine Drugs, 23(5), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23050188

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop