Next Article in Journal
A Robust Marine Collagen Peptide–Agarose 3D Culture System for In Vitro Modeling of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Anti-Cancer Therapeutic Development
Previous Article in Journal
A Stable Delivery System for Meretrix meretrix Derived Immunomodulatory Peptide (QLNWD): Fabrication and Characterization of Glycosylated Protein Nanoparticle
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel pH-Responsive PSS-Loaded Chitosan Matrix Nanoparticles Ameliorate Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Progress in the Application of Marine Polysaccharide Drug Delivery Systems in Tumor Immunotherapy: Multiple Mechanisms and Material Forms

1
College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
Technical Innovation Center for Utilization of Marine Biological Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China
3
Marine Biomedical Science and Technology Innovation Platform of Lin-Gang Special Area, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2025, 23(10), 384; https://doi.org/10.3390/md23100384
Submission received: 1 September 2025 / Revised: 22 September 2025 / Accepted: 26 September 2025 / Published: 27 September 2025

Abstract

Tumor immunotherapy, a revolutionary cancer treatment, is hindered by inadequate immune cell activation, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and off-target toxicities of immunotherapeutics. These bottlenecks necessitate innovative strategies to enhance efficacy and reduce side effects. Marine polysaccharides have garnered significant attention due to their potential to enhance immune cell activity and regulate the tumor microenvironment, among other benefits. Due to their excellent biocompatibility, modifiability, and relatively low cost, polysaccharides are increasingly being explored as materials for drug delivery systems. The development of marine polysaccharide-based drug delivery systems represents an opportunity for advancing tumor immunotherapy. This review focuses on the application of marine polysaccharide drug delivery systems in tumor immunotherapy, exploring the mechanisms underlying the bioactivity of marine polysaccharides, the design of drug delivery systems, and the interactions between these systems and tumor immunotherapy, aiming to provide a framework for advancing marine polysaccharide-based therapeutics, accelerating the clinical translation of effective, safe, and targeted tumor immunotherapy strategies.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Tumor immunotherapy has emerged as a groundbreaking advancement in cancer treatment, fundamentally operating by activating or reshaping the immune system to recognize and eliminate tumor cells [1,2]. Nevertheless, considerable challenges persist, such as immunosuppressive mechanisms within the tumor microenvironment (TME) [3], insufficient immune cell activity [4], inefficient targeted delivery of therapeutic agents [5], and systemic side effects. Research highlights that dysregulated T-cell function plays a critical role in immune evasion. For instance, Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor Interacting Protein Like 1 (ITPRIPL1) inhibits T-cell activation by binding to a vital component of cluster of differentiation 3ε (CD3ε) [1], while the Lymphocyte-Activation Gene 3 (LAG3) loses its immune checkpoint function through ligand-induced ubiquitination [2]. Additionally, immunosuppressive cell populations, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), promote immune evasion via metabolism-related receptors like G protein-coupled receptor 84 (GPR84) [3]. These findings have not only enhanced our understanding of tumor immune evasion mechanisms but also provided crucial targets for developing novel therapeutic strategies.
In this regard, nanodelivery systems present innovative solutions to these challenges due to their superior targeting capabilities, drug-loading capacities, and controlled release properties. Nanocarriers can significantly improve the delivery efficiency of immunomodulators. For example, personalized nanovaccines have been developed using T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM3)-silencing nanoadjuvants and desialylated tumor cell membrane antigens [4]. This system effectively activates antigen-presenting cells while simultaneously blocking immunosuppressive signals, thereby enhancing T-cell antitumor activity. Another strategic approach involves the triple amplification of the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) signaling pathway via nanoparticles [6], which significantly boosts dendritic cell activation and antigen presentation. Furthermore, nanodelivery systems demonstrate distinctive advantages in countering immunosuppression within the TME. Specifically designed nanoformulations targeting GPR84 [3] (associated with MDSCs) and GPR34 [7] (linked to innate lymphoid cells (ILC1s)) precisely modulate immune cell metabolic activity and reverse immunosuppression. Moreover, biomimetic nanocarriers that mimic tumor cell membrane components [4,8] enhance drug accumulation at the tumor site while minimizing systemic toxicity. Additionally, nanotechnology holds significant promise in combination therapies. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-guided nanodelivery systems [9] facilitate personalized treatment adjustments, while nanoparticles co-targeting Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) and IL-2Rβγ, in conjunction with radiotherapy, effectively suppress pancreatic cancer growth and metastasis [10]. Notably, TME-responsive nanosystems [8] can amplify reactive oxygen species (ROS) production through multiple pathways, achieving synergistic effects between photodynamic therapy and immunotherapy.
Marine polysaccharides, which are biologically active polymeric carbohydrates derived from marine organisms (e.g., algae, marine animals, etc.), can be classified into marine animal polysaccharides (e.g., chitosan from crustaceans, chondroitin sulfate from fish cartilage) [11], marine plant polysaccharides (e.g., alginate from brown algae, carrageenan from red algae) [12], and marine microbial polysaccharides (e.g., Alteromonas) [13]. They possess complex structures and exhibit unique biological activities, including antitumor [14], antiviral [15], anti-cardiovascular disease [16], antioxidant [17,18], and immunomodulatory [19,20,21] functions (Figure 1). Marine polysaccharides have been extensively studied for application in tumor immunotherapy [22,23,24]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that marine polysaccharides can stimulate immune cells [25,26], regulate immune responses [27], protect drugs from degradation [26,28], and enable precise drug delivery [29]. Nanoparticle systems serve as versatile platforms for the delivery of not only biomacromolecules (e.g., antigens and antibodies) but also low-molecular-weight immunomodulators. Synthetic agents, such as sirolimus and tacrolimus, as well as natural compounds derived from plant extracts, have been successfully encapsulated and delivered using nanocarriers [30]. In a representative study, marine polysaccharide-based nanoparticles engineered for the targeted delivery of apremilast to inflammatory macrophages demonstrated a significant enhancement in drug bioavailability and a concomitant reduction in off-target toxicity towards healthy tissues [31]. Consistent with these findings, the nanoparticles exhibited superior targeting efficacy and robust cellular internalization in in vitro models. Marine polysaccharides can serve as delivery carriers in various forms, including hydrogels, microspheres, and nanoparticles, offering advantages such as excellent biocompatibility, degradability, ease of modification, and functionalization. Furthermore, marine polysaccharide drug delivery systems can be combined with other therapeutic approaches, such as gene therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, to enhance therapeutic efficacy. Although challenges remain, including issues related to quality, stability, and in vivo metabolic processes, marine polysaccharide drug delivery systems present promising new opportunities for advancing tumor immunotherapy [32].
This paper presents a systematic investigation into the application of marine polysaccharide-based drug delivery systems in tumor immunotherapy, with the objective of evaluating their capacity to enhance immune cell activity, modulate the tumor microenvironment, improve drug stability and bioavailability, and facilitate combinatorial therapeutic strategies. These systems are specifically designed around five representative marine polysaccharides (alginate, chitosan, carrageenan, fucoidan and laminarin), with their structural characteristics in Figure 2 [22,33,34,35,36,37]. The selected polysaccharides exhibit distinct advantages for drug delivery applications, attributable to their biocompatible nature, tunable physicochemical characteristics, and intrinsic bioactivities that synergistically enhance immunotherapeutic outcomes.
Here, a comprehensive and systematic literature search was conducted by databases, including Web of Science, Wiley, PubMed, and ScienceDirect, These databases were queried using structured search strings that combined keywords and Boolean operators (AND/OR) pertaining to three thematic categories: polysaccharides (“marine polysaccharide” OR “alginate” OR “chitosan” OR “carrageenan” OR “fucoidan” OR “laminarin”), applications (“polysaccharide structure” OR “drug delivery” OR “nanoparticle” OR “hydrogel” OR “microsphere”), and research field (“cancer immunotherapy” OR “immune cells” OR “tumor microenvironment” OR “immune checkpoint inhibitors” OR “cancer vaccine”). The search covered publications from 2000 to 2025, with emphasis on recent studies (2020–2025) to capture the latest advancements. Inclusion criteria required that studies focus on alginate, chitosan, carrageenan, fucoidan, or laminarin as primary materials in drug delivery systems applied to cancer immunotherapy, and be original articles, reviews, or authoritative book chapters in English. Exclusion criteria removed non-English publications, and conference abstracts. From an initial pool of over 700 records, duplicates were removed, followed by title/abstract screening and full-text assessment for eligibility. Data were then extracted and categorized by polysaccharide type and delivery system form. Through the aforementioned systematic and rigorous process, this review was ultimately completed.

2. Potential Advantages of Marine Polysaccharides for Tumor Immunotherapy

The potential advantages of marine polysaccharides for tumor immunotherapy include enhancing the activity of immune cells, regulating the tumor microenvironment, improving drug stability and bioavailability, and combination therapy, as discussed in detail below (Figure 3).

2.1. Enhances the Activity of Immune Cells

Marine polysaccharide drug delivery systems modulate innate and adaptive immune responses through multiple mechanisms. They stimulate macrophage activation via TLR4-mediated signaling pathways, as demonstrated by fucoidan FPS1M from Laminaria japonica, which induces M1 polarization and tumor-killing capabilities through the PI3K-Akt-mTOR axis [38]. Carbonated chitosan nanoparticles generate ROS to drive macrophage polarization toward the M1 phenotype, enhancing antimicrobial immunity [39]. Laminarin and its derivatives exhibit notable immunomodulatory activities and are specifically recognized by the Dectin-1 receptor, which is highly expressed on tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). This enables targeted reprogramming of TAMs—for instance, promoting a shift from the pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotype to the antitumoral M1 phenotype [40,41]. Laminarin also enhances antitumor immunity by facilitating the maturation of dendritic cells [42]. Certain marine polysaccharides also promote cytokine secretion (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-4) and contribute to immune regulation. For instance, sulfated fucoidan SHPPB2 from Sargassum fusiforme stimulates splenocyte proliferation and induces anti-inflammatory cytokine production (IL-2, IL-4, IL-10) in tumor-bearing rats [43].
Marine polysaccharide drug delivery systems modulate immune cell functions through multiple mechanisms. They enhance natural killer (NK) cell activity by upregulating CD69 expression, as demonstrated by Codium fragile polysaccharides serving as NK cell stimulators in immunotherapy [44,45]. Additionally, marine polysaccharides such as alginate promote lymphocyte proliferation and regulate immune function. Alginate reduces ROS in CD8+ T cells through glutathione (GSH) elevation, thereby enhancing T cell memory [46]. Fucoidan from Ecklonia cava stimulates dendritic cell activation in both bone marrow-derived and splenic populations [47].
Furthermore, marine polysaccharides can modulate immune cell signaling pathways, such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) pathways [48]. Sea cucumber-derived fucoidan induces TLR2/4 conformational changes in RAW264.7 cells, triggering NF-κB activation and subsequent cytokine (TNF-α, IL-6) production [49]. This pathway activation enhances immune response through chemokine secretion and cell behavior regulation.
Chitosan-based systems demonstrate tumor-suppressive potential by inhibiting Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) upregulation via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 (STAT1) suppression [50]. Nanocarriers fabricated from marine polysaccharide systems enable targeted delivery of immunostimulants (cytokines, chemokines) to immune cells, improving intracellular signaling efficiency.

2.2. Regulating the Tumor Microenvironment

TME is a complex ecosystem comprising tumor cells, extracellular matrix, fibroblasts, immune cells, and blood vessels, alongside diverse cytokines and growth factors. While polysaccharides can enhance anti-tumor immunity through immune activation [51,52,53], the TME harbors immunosuppressive elements—including regulatory T cells (Tregs), MDSCs, TAMs, and cytokines like TGF-β and IL-10 [54,55]—that inhibit immune cell activity and compromise immunotherapy efficacy. Notably, laminarin induces tumor cell senescence by upregulating senescence marker protein-30 (SMP-30), thereby altering the proliferation–survival balance within the TME [56]. Its sulfated derivatives, such as laminarin sulfate (LS), potently inhibit heparanase activity, which helps preserve basement membrane and extracellular matrix (ECM) integrity, and reduces tumor invasion and metastasis [57].
Marine polysaccharides counteract these effects through multiple mechanisms: (1) promoting T cell differentiation into Th1 and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) to enhance antitumor activity [58,59], with chitosan-based vaccines modulating Th1/Th2 balance via intranasal immune tolerance and IFN-γ secretion [60]; (2) inhibiting Treg function to reduce immune suppression [61]; and (3) the inhibition of angiogenesis via suppression of pro-angiogenic factor secretion: Fucoidan significantly attenuates tumor-induced angiogenesis by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathways, thereby inhibiting neovascularization and compromising tumor nutrient supply [62]. Separately, VE-cadherin has been identified as a key molecular target for anti-angiogenic therapy [63].
Hypoxia, a critical TME feature [64], disrupts immune cell metabolism by inducing ROS accumulation and energy deficits, ultimately reducing cytotoxicity and immune surveillance. Alginate-based hydrogels alleviate this condition by releasing 4-1BB antibodies and Axitinib, modulating T cell mitochondrial function to reverse T cell exhaustion and inhibit tumor progression [65]. Inadequate immune cell infiltration remains a major barrier to immunotherapy efficacy. Marine polysaccharide systems address this by delivering chemokines (e.g., CCL21) to attract T cells and NK cells to tumor sites, while fucoidan-based magnetic nanomedicines revitalize tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to repair the immunosuppressive TME [66].
These systems further modulate the TME through multifunctional strategies: (1) ROS-responsive hydrogels loaded with cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) enhance combination therapies by leveraging local ROS [67]; (2) siRNA delivery targeting EZH2/CD73 suppresses tumor progression and boosts antitumor immunity [68]; and (3) chitosan-based formulations (solutions, films, gels, microneedles) systematically demonstrate TME remodeling potential [69]. Additionally, loading immunosuppressive agents like anti-CTLA-4/anti-PD-1 antibodies enables targeted inhibition of immunosuppressive cells, enhancing immune cell activity [69]. These strategies collectively address TME immunosuppression through hypoxia alleviation, immune cell recruitment, and targeted modulation of key signaling pathways.

2.3. Improve Drug Stability and Bioavailability

Marine polysaccharides represent a class of natural biomaterials widely recognized for their exceptional biocompatibility, robust chemical stability [70], and effective barrier properties. These polysaccharides confer significant protection to therapeutic agents—including cytokines, antibodies, and nucleic acids such as DNA [71]—against enzymatic degradation and immune clearance, thereby prolonging their in vivo circulation half-life and facilitating targeted delivery [72]. For example, laminarin, a β-glucan polysaccharide, demonstrates resistance to gastric degradation and effectively shields miRNA-223 from ribonuclease (RNase) activity in the gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, it facilitates targeted accumulation at inflammatory intestinal sites through specific recognition by macrophage Dectin-1 receptors [73]. Similarly, MTC-Tollip-based nanoparticle systems enable macrophage-specific drug delivery and contribute to the promotion of mucosal repair [74]. Moreover, these polysaccharide-based platforms allow for controlled release of therapeutic agents, which enhances sustained pharmacological exposure while minimizing systemic toxicity.

2.4. Combination Therapy

Marine polysaccharide-based drug delivery systems demonstrate synergistic potential when combined with immunotherapeutic strategies, including adoptive cellular therapy (ACT), tumor vaccines, and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). In ACT applications, these systems effectively encapsulate and deliver immune effector cells (T cells, NK cells) within biocompatible nanoparticles or hydrogels, enhancing cell survival and tumor-targeting efficiency [75,76]. Structural protection from immune degradation, coupled with site-specific delivery, significantly improves therapeutic outcomes by increasing effector cell persistence at tumor sites.
Marine polysaccharides themselves possess inherent immunomodulatory effects that enhance the immune system’s ability to recognize and attack tumors. When combined with ACT, the marine polysaccharide drug delivery system can further amplify the anti-tumor effects by releasing immunomodulatory molecules or interacting with immune cells. For example, marine polysaccharides can stimulate the maturation and antigen presentation of dendritic cells, promote T cell activation and proliferation [77].
In immune checkpoint inhibition, marine polysaccharide systems address PD-1/PD-L1 pathway evasion by serving as targeted delivery vehicles for checkpoint inhibitors. Marine polysaccharides can modulate cellular signaling pathways by binding to cell surface receptors, activating or inhibiting intracellular enzymes or proteins, or facilitating intercellular communication. Marine polysaccharides can also be used as drug delivery carriers for immune checkpoint inhibitors, directing them to their target cells and regulating the expression and function of immune checkpoint molecules [71,78,79,80,81,82].
Combinatorial approaches with conventional therapies demonstrate additional benefits. When integrated with chemotherapy [83] and radiotherapy [84], marine polysaccharide systems reduce treatment-related side effects while enhancing immunotherapy efficacy through synergistic antitumor mechanisms.

3. Application of Marine Polysaccharide Drug Delivery System in Tumor Immunotherapy

Through a systematic investigation of the literature in this field spanning multiple years in the database, several of the most widely used polysaccharides—such as alginate, chitosan, carrageenan, and fucoidan, and laminarin—have been summarized and highlighted as key materials for the preparation of various drug delivery systems (Table 1). This includes their formulation types, preparation methods, and application aspects. These marine polysaccharides offer versatile and effective solutions for enhancing immunotherapy through targeted delivery, controlled release, and immune modulation (Figure 4).

3.1. Alginate

3.1.1. Alginate Hydrogel Delivery Systems

Alginate, a biocompatible polysaccharide derived from brown algae, forms hydrogels through ionic crosslinking with multivalent cations (e.g., Ca2+), enabling programmable drug release profiles [119,120]. These hydrogels facilitate the delivery of therapeutic agents, including drugs [121], cells, and bioactive factors [122], while exhibiting immunomodulatory properties. The physicochemical properties of alginate hydrogels are highly tunable, achieved by modulating parameters such as polymer concentration, cation type, and crosslinking conditions.
Alginate hydrogels enhance anti-tumor activity of CD8⁺ T cells by increasing the proportion of central memory T cells (TCM) [46]. Additionally, they can deliver therapeutic dendritic cells (DCs), cytokines, or chemotherapeutics to tumor sites, promoting immune cell infiltration and depleting TAMs [123]. Notably, macroporous alginate hydrogels engineered for granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) release demonstrate enhanced recruitment of DCs and T cell activation, while concurrently Treg cell populations in the tumor microenvironment [124].
The stimulus-responsive capabilities of alginate hydrogels further expand their therapeutic applications. Alginate hydrogels support stimulus-responsive drug delivery through pH-, ROS-, or enzyme-sensitive linkages. Acid-responsive WA-cRGD hydrogels, for example, trigger prodrug activation in acidic tumor microenvironments, inducing apoptosis [125]. In sonodynamic therapy (SDT) applications, alginate hydrogels integrated with semiconductor polymer nanoparticles generate singlet oxygen (1O2), which induces immunogenic cell death (ICD) and facilitates the release of programmed death ligand 1 antibody (aPD-L1) [126,127].

3.1.2. Alginate Beads Delivery Systems

Alginate beads are millimeter-scale spherical particles (typically 1–3 mm in diameter) prepared via ionotropic gelation, which forms a three-dimensional hydrogel network suitable for drug delivery. Their favorable biocompatibility, biodegradability, and mild fabrication conditions make them promising carriers for drugs, genes, and cytokines in cancer therapy [128,129].
The gelation process involves cross-linking sodium alginate with calcium ions, leading to a unique “egg-box” structure that provides not only biocompatibility but also pH-responsive behavior. This allows for targeted drug release under specific acidic conditions such as the tumor microenvironment or intestinal tract [128,129]. A common preparation method is the drip-forming technique, in which a drug-loaded alginate solution is dropped into a calcium chloride solution to instantaneously form stable gel beads. To optimize their properties, alginate is often blended with other polysaccharides (e.g., low-methoxyl pectin or gum arabic) or processed via advanced methods such as gas-shearing to improve size uniformity and monodispersity [130,131].
In cancer immunotherapy, alginate beads show considerable promise. They have been used to encapsulate chemotherapeutic agents like 5-fluorouracil [132] and sorafenib [133], not only directly killing tumor cells but also inducing ICD. This process enhances tumor antigen exposure and activates dendritic and T cells, thereby linking chemotherapy to immune activation. Sulfonation of alginate beads can further improve drug loading and antit efficacy [132]. Beyond chemotherapy, these systems can also carry radionuclides (e.g., yttrium-90) for radioimmunotherapy. The resulting β-rays induce tumor cell death while modulating the immunosuppressive microenvironment, synergizing with immunotherapeutic approaches [134]. Key advantages of alginate beads include drug protection, reduced systemic toxicity, controlled localized release, and their utility as a versatile platform for multimodal therapies such as chemo-immuno-radiotherapy [128,133,134].

3.1.3. Alginate Microsphere Delivery Systems

Alginate microspheres, micron-scale spherical particles (1–1000 μm), are extensively utilized in drug delivery systems due to their high surface-area-to-volume ratio, dispersibility, and structural tunability. These microspheres can encapsulate and release drugs through surface adsorption or pore diffusion. In addition, a defining characteristic of alginate microspheres is their pH-responsive behavior, which enables site-specific drug release in physiological environments [135,136]. For example, they have been engineered as radionuclide carriers with immunomodulatory functions, such as encapsulating indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitors for radioimmunotherapy [137]. Their versatility extends to oral delivery of genetic vectors, as demonstrated by alginate microspheres encapsulating VP2 gene vectors to prevent gastrointestinal disorders [138].

3.1.4. Alginate Nanoparticle Delivery Systems

Alginate nanoparticles function as non-toxic cryoprotectants by preventing cell membrane rupture during freeze–thaw cycles [139,140]. The tunable release kinetics of alginate nanoparticles further optimize immunostimulant delivery. Sodium alginate coatings improve nanoparticle stability in simulated intestinal fluids [141], while siRNA-loaded alginate nanoparticles suppress A2AR and CTLA-4 expression in T cells. This downregulation of PKA/SHP2/PP2Aα signaling pathways enhances anti-tumor activity [78]. By modulating peak concentrations, these systems reduce systemic toxicity while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. These properties enable synergistic combination therapies, where nanoparticle-encapsulated immune cells are integrated with chemotherapeutics, radiotherapy, or targeted agents. Multimodal approaches leverage sustained release profiles to optimize therapeutic outcomes while minimizing off-target effects. This strategy highlights the translational potential of alginate nanoparticles in advancing precision tumor immunotherapy.

3.1.5. Others

Beyond hydrogels, microspheres, and nanoparticles, alginate can be engineered into 3D scaffolds and coatings for biomedical applications. Its three-dimensional structuring capability provides a biomimetic microenvironment for cell growth, supporting critical cellular processes such as adhesion, migration, and differentiation [142,143]. Alginate-based 3D cultures closely replicate tumor-like conditions, making them ideal platforms for preclinical evaluation of biotherapeutic agents [143].

3.2. Chitosan

3.2.1. Chitosan Hydrogel Delivery System

Chitosan, a biocompatible and biodegradable polysaccharide derived from crustacean shells, contains hydroxyl (-OH), amino (-NH2), and N-acetylamino groups that enable crosslinking via physical [144,145], chemical [146,147], or ionic [148,149] methods to form hydrogels. The use of different anionic cross-linking agents influences the properties of hydrogels [150]. Chemical modifications further enhance functional properties, such as anti-swelling chitosan hydrogels for glioblastoma treatment [151]. Owing to its structural versatility, chitosan-based hydrogels enable precise drug release through environmentally responsive mechanisms. These responsive systems include pH-sensitive platforms that exploit the acidic tumor microenvironment [152], temperature-responsive carriers [153], and enzyme-triggered degradation pathways. pH-sensitive hydrogels release doxorubicin (DOX) in acidic tumor microenvironments, inducing tumor cell death and immune activation [152]. NIR-controlled hydrogels enhance local drug concentrations at tumor sites [152], while thermosensitive LPR@CHG hydrogels promote macrophage polarization and reduce post-surgical tumor recurrence [154].
Chitosan’s immunostimulatory properties make it a promising adjuvant, bridging innate and adaptive immunity [71]. Chitosan hydrogels activate macrophages, enhancing phagocytosis and cytokine production (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1) [155], and stimulate T/B-cell activation. Its mucosal adhesion properties are advantageous for mucosal vaccines [156,157,158,159]. Dual-function chitosan hydrogels act as both antigen delivery systems and immunostimulators [160]. For example, Ncom gel vaccines enhance DC maturation and macrophage pro-inflammatory responses, inducing T cell-mediated immunity [161]. Phosphorylated chitosan (PCS) hydrogels loaded with ovalbumin (OVA) significantly increased antigen-specific immune responses and memory T cell populations [162]. Furthermore, in postoperative settings, chitosan-based systems combine chemotherapy (e.g., Cyc-Lip) and immunotherapy (e.g., aCD47) to inhibit tumor recurrence [163].

3.2.2. Chitosan Microsphere Delivery Systems

Chitosan microspheres, spherical particles with diameters ranging from micrometers to hundreds of micrometers, are synthesized via emulsification cross-linking [164,165,166], ionic gelation [167,168], or spray-drying [169,170,171,172]. Their high surface area and tunable physicochemical properties enable surface functionalization to alter hydrophilicity, charge, and hydrophobicity, conferring targeted delivery and controlled release capabilities. For example, inhalable microspheres encapsulating nanoparticles degrade via matrix metalloproteinases, releasing anti-tumor agents that reprogram TAMs from pro-tumorigenic to anti-tumorigenic phenotypes [173]. These examples underscore chitosan microspheres as versatile functional materials with optimized performance for biomedical and environmental applications.

3.2.3. Chitosan Nanoparticle Delivery Systems

Chitosan nanoparticle delivery systems have emerged as versatile platforms in tumor immunotherapy [174]. A biocompatible chitosan-based system enabled DMSO-free cryopreservation of NK cells, preserving their cytotoxicity, degranulation, and cytokine production [175]. Encapsulation within chitosan nanoparticles also enhances anti-tumor immune responses, as evidenced by upregulated expression of NKG2D, CD56, FasL, and perforin in Vγ9Vδ2 T cells [176]. Secondly, chitosan nanoparticles facilitate targeted delivery of immunostimulants to tumor sites, thereby amplifying local therapeutic efficacy [177]. For instance, nanoparticles encapsulating Mycobacterium indicus pranii (MIP) demonstrated preferential accumulation in the TME [178]. Thirdly, these systems integrate with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors to achieve synergistic therapeutic outcomes [179]. Finally, the adaptability of chitosan nanoparticle systems allows for personalized treatment strategies, where immunostimulant selection and nanoparticle formulation are tailored to tumor type, disease stage, and patient-specific immune profiles, thereby optimizing therapeutic efficacy.

3.2.4. Others

Beyond conventional formulations, chitosan’s versatility extends to advanced platforms such as chitosan-functionalized graphene oxide (GO-CS), chitosan micelles, and glycosylated chitosan (GC), each enhancing immunotherapy efficacy through distinct mechanisms. First, GO-CS reduces nonspecific protein adsorption while improving biocompatibility. The synergistic immunostimulatory effect of GO and chitosan activates RAW264.7 cells, promoting cytokine release for immune response mediation [180]. Second, mannose-modified stearic acid-grafted chitosan micelles (MChSA) overcome antigen uptake limitations by DCs, enabling targeted delivery to tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN) and inducing robust CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T-cell responses with tumor growth inhibition [181]. Third, glycosylated chitosan (GC), derived from chitosan via saccharification, leverages biocompatibility, water solubility, and APC activation to function as a potent adjuvant. Notably, GC-adjuvant therapy not only enhances the efficacy of PDT vaccines but also reduces the population of immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells [182]. GC also synergizes with photodynamic therapy (PDT) and laser immunotherapy [183], amplifying ICD by releasing tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) [184]. This multimodal approach integrates photothermal/photodynamic effects with immune adjuvants, offering superior efficacy for metastatic tumors compared to monotherapies.

3.3. Carrageenan

Carrageenan, a sulfated polysaccharide derived from red macroalgae, has emerged as a promising candidate for advanced drug delivery systems due to its intrinsic biocompatibility, tunable gelation properties, structural modifiability, and cost-effectiveness [185,186]. Its hierarchical molecular architecture enables rational design of diverse delivery systems, including hydrogels, microspheres, films, emulsions, and nanoparticles, each exhibiting distinct pharmacokinetic profiles.
Hydrogel systems demonstrate therapeutic potential through sustained drug release mechanisms [187,188]. Structural parameters such as carrageenan isoform composition and concentration critically regulate hydrogel properties. Notably, agar-κ-carrageenan (1:1) hydrogels exhibit exceptional swelling capacity (1386%), facilitating enhanced drug loading [189]. pH-responsive formulations further expand application scope, as demonstrated by κ-carrageenan-chitosan magnetic nanocomposites that enable tumor-targeted adriamycin delivery via acidic microenvironment responsiveness [101,190]. Electrostatic interactions between menthol and sulfate groups in κ-carrageenan have been exploited to develop pH-sensitive hydrogel beads for insulin delivery, achieving near-zero-order release kinetics through concentration-dependent structural optimization [191].
The degree of sulfation significantly modulates carrageenan’s physicochemical behavior, particularly in film-based delivery systems. Highly sulfated carrageenan films exhibit rapid dissolution in artificial tears, whereas low-sulfated κ/β-carrageenan derivatives maintain structural integrity for prolonged mucoadhesive drug release in ocular applications [190]. Structural modifications also enable microsphere formation via emulsification cross-linking, spray drying, and ionic gelation techniques. For instance, alginate-carrageenan composite microspheres have been successfully employed for hydrophilic immunoglobulin (IgY) encapsulation through KCl-induced three-dimensional network formation [192].

3.4. Fucoidan

Fucoidan is a class of polysaccharide substances extracted from brown algae. A substantial body of literature has demonstrated that fucoidan is increasingly used to fabricate delivery systems due to its favorable properties, including biocompatibility [193,194], degradability, ease of modification and functionalization, high drug loading capacity, preservation of drug activity, enhancement of osmotic and retention effects, as well as its wide availability and low cost. Fucoidan’s specific spatial structure and intermolecular forces make it effective at loading drugs, genes, cytokines, and other bioactive molecules. For example, distributing fucoidan with anti-inflammatory effects onto nanofibers within scaffolds can induce apoptosis in cancerous epithelial cells, offering potential applications in localized epithelial cancer immunotherapy and drug delivery [195]. Structural advantages of fucoidan have been leveraged to develop multifunctional nanocarriers for combination therapies. For instance, fucoidan-cisplatin nanoparticles (FCNP) exhibited greater cytotoxicity against HCT-8 cells than cisplatin alone [196]. A complex coagulant consisting of fucoidan and polylysine was used to load IL-2, leading to the activation of tumor-reactive T cells at the tumor site through pH-adjusted injection gels [197]. Additionally, fucoidan’s combination with selenosulfur bonds enabled the production of micelles loaded with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), which interfered with the hypoxia pathway, as well as the chemotherapeutic drug carfilzomib (CFZ). This combination induced immunogenic cell death, inhibited hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1α) expression, and alleviated immunosuppression through TAM inhibition [198].
Fucoidan can also demonstrate dual immunotherapy potential through direct anti-tumor activity and immune regulation. QU@FU-TS nanocomplexes induce oxidative stress and apoptosis in tumor cells [199]. Ecklonia cava-derived fucoidan (ECF) enhances antigen-specific immunity by suppressing CT-26 carcinoma and activating DCs, NK cells, and T cells in mediastinal lymph nodes (mLN) [200]. These mechanisms establish fucoidan as a multifunctional platform for cancer immunotherapy.

3.5. Laminarin

Laminarin, a natural β-glucan predominantly derived from brown algae such as Laminaria japonica, has attracted considerable attention due to its multifaceted biological activities, including immunomodulation [201], antitumor effects [202], and antioxidant properties [203,204]. Its excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and modifiable chemical structure further make it an ideal biomaterial for constructing nano-delivery systems.
Rich in hydroxyl groups, laminarin can be chemically functionalized through sulfation or amination to introduce charged or hydrophobic moieties, facilitating self-assembly or composite formation with other materials into stable nanostructures, including nanoparticles, nanomicelles, and hydrogels [205,206]. These nano-systems are capable of efficiently encapsulating hydrophobic chemotherapeutic drugs, nucleic acid therapeutics (e.g., miRNA and siRNA), or antigens, thereby shielding them from degradation and enabling tumor-targeted delivery via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [207]. Among these, nanoparticles represent a prominent form. For example, cationic nanoparticles fabricated from laminarin of Laminaria japonica and modified with polyethylenimine (PEI) have been developed as a novel vaccine adjuvant. This system effectively delivers the model antigen OVA and harnesses the ability of laminarin to activate the Dectin-1 receptor on antigen-presenting cells, synergistically stimulating DC maturation and significantly enhancing antigen-specific immune responses—offering a promising strategy for cancer vaccine development [208]. In the context of nanomicelles, laminarin has been employed as a hydrophilic shell to encapsulate paclitaxel nanoformulations (Genexol-PM), forming pH-sensitive nanomicelles for the treatment of thyroid cancer. This system enables responsive drug release in the acidic tumor microenvironment and co-delivers a miR-620 inhibitor to suppress the IRF2BP2 axis, resulting in dual inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis [118]. Hydrogels, suitable for localized sustained release, have been engineered using photo-cross-linking techniques to yield injectable and self-healing laminarin-based hydrogels. Although their direct application in tumor immunotherapy remains underexplored, their well-established use in controlled drug release underscores considerable potential. For instance, they could be loaded with immunotherapeutic agents and implanted postoperatively into the tumor resection cavity to achieve long-term local release, thereby activating antitumor immunity and preventing recurrence [206].
Furthermore, other composite systems—such as laminarin–platinum nanozyme conjugates originally designed for intracerebral hemorrhage—leverage the ability of laminarin to modulate microglial/macrophage polarization. This provides an innovative synergistic approach for targeting TAMs and reprogramming the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment [209].

4. Discussion

Traditional cancer therapies encounter substantial challenges, including pronounced toxicity, limited specificity, and emerging drug resistance, driving the pursuit of innovative approaches. Marine polysaccharides, valued for their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and multifaceted bioactivities, have emerged as promising biomaterials to address these limitations [22,23,32]. Recent studies have positioned polysaccharides such as chitosan, carrageenan, fucoidan, and laminarin as core components of multifunctional nanocarriers (e.g., nanoparticles, hydrogels, microspheres, and microneedles), harnessing their inherent properties to enable smart remodeling of the TME and precise modulation of systemic immunity.
Recent studies on marine polysaccharides (chitosan, carrageenan, fucoidan, and laminarin) show their potential beyond inherent properties, often achieving synergistic efficacy through combination with other therapeutics [22,48,210]. Notable advances include biomimetic engineering of chitosan nanoparticles. For instance, one study employed electrostatic interactions to conjugate chitosan nanoparticles with a FA-PMAN polymer containing phosphorylcholine, sulfonate, and folate groups, yielding FA-PMAN/CS particles that leverage the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for tumor accumulation and improved pharmacokinetics [211]. Another investigation introduced κ-carrageenan-coated magnetic hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/chitosan nanoparticles (mHPMC-Chito/κ-Car) for pH-responsive delivery of methotrexate (MTX), exhibiting rapid release in acidic TME (pH 5.5) while remaining stable at physiological pH (7.4) [97]. Fucoidan-based microneedle systems, incorporating thioketal (TK) linkages for ROS-triggered drug release, have been applied to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment and show potential for ROS-enriched TMEs [112]. Laminarin serves as a coating for Genexol-PM pH-sensitive micelles, facilitating targeted inhibition of thyroid cancer cells in acidic TMEs [118]. Contemporary oncology is shifting toward multimodal synergies, with nanomedicine-ICI combinations gaining prominence. Marine polysaccharides contribute multidimensional antitumor effects via local immune augmentation and systemic activation. ICIs exhibit low response rates in “cold” tumors (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC) due to insufficient antitumor immune cell infiltration in the TME [212]; carrageenan-based embolic microspheres (MCGs) offer a means to convert “cold” TMEs to “hot” ones [108]. Furthermore, oral fucoidan modulates the gut-immune axis by promoting beneficial microbiota, thereby reshaping the gut microbiome and enhancing anti-PD-1 efficacy [213]. This mechanism indirectly bolsters tumor therapy through a non-tumor-related organ, paving the way for low-toxicity oral adjuvants.
Although marine polysaccharide-based nanomedicines largely remain preclinical, translational promise is evident, as exemplified by the FDA-approved polylactic acid-based Genexol®-PM [110]. Nonetheless, challenges persist: fucoidan’s bioactivity and immunogenicity vary with source, molecular weight, and sulfation degree, complicating batch consistency; multi-responsive systems (e.g., pH-, ROS-, or NIR-II-sensitive) perform well in vitro but face predictability issues in the dynamic, heterogeneous in vivo TME; and therapeutic efficacy demands precise alignment with disease pathology, as seen in laminarin’s differential outcomes in macrophage- versus T-cell-driven models [73]. To overcome these challenges, future research should focus on: (i) developing multi-responsive nanosystems that combine pH-triggered ligand exposure, ROS-activated drug release, and NIR-II photothermal therapy to enhance specificity and therapeutic efficacy [214,215,216]; (ii) advancing oral immunomodulation strategies using metagenomics and metabolomics to identify critical microbial metabolites and their interactions with immune cells (e.g., T and NK cells), paving the way for targeted “probiotic cocktails” or precise immune modulators [110]; and (iii) exploring innovative combinatorial therapies integrating polysaccharide carriers with CAR-T cells, oncolytic viruses, or gene editing, while optimizing biomaterial engineering for enhanced stability, control, and standardized production to address batch inconsistency and scalability [216,217,218].

5. Summary

This review details the potential benefits of marine polysaccharides in tumor immunotherapy and summarizes the drug delivery systems constituted by marine polysaccharides (alginate, chitosan, carrageenan, fucoidan, and laminarin, among others). This paper finds that these delivery systems are primarily based on hydrogels, microspheres, and nanoparticles, though other forms, such as thin films and emulsions, are also utilized. Additionally, exploring the combined use of marine polysaccharide drug delivery systems with other innovative therapeutic methods, such as gene therapy and novel combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors, is expected to provide a more robust solution for the treatment of tumors and other diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation and writing—original draft, M.C. and S.Y.; conceptualization, funding acquisition and writing—review and editing, P.W. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Open Project Fund of Marine Biomedical Science and Technology Innovation Platform of Lin-Gang Special Area (RWS-2024-002) and the Fund of the Technology Innovation Center for Exploitation of Marine Biological Resources, MNR (TICMBR202506).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created in this study. Data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Deng, S.Y.; Zhang, Y.B.; Wang, H.B.; Liang, W.H.; Xie, L.; Li, N.; Fang, Y.; Wang, Y.T.; Liu, J.Y.; Chi, H.; et al. ITPRIPL1 binds CD3 8 to impede T cell activation and enable tumor immune evasion. Cell 2024, 187, 2305–2323.e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, Y.; Dai, A.; Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Cui, J.; Yang, H.; Si, L.; Jiao, T.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Ligand-induced ubiquitination unleashes LAG3 immune checkpoint function by hindering membrane sequestration of signaling motifs. Cell 2025, 188, 2354–2371.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Qin, G.H.; Liu, S.S.; Liu, J.Y.; Hu, H.W.; Yang, L.; Zhao, Q.T.; Li, C.C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y. Overcoming resistance to immunotherapy by targeting GPR84 in myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, K.M.; Li, X.L.; Wu, J.; Wu, H.S.; Wu, M.; Zhou, Y.P.; Lin, Y.; Zou, Y.F.; Jiang, X.Q.; Xu, H.E. A Dual Enhancing Strategy of Novel Nanovaccine Based on TIM3 Silencing Nanoadjuvants and Desialylated Cancer Cell Membrane Antigens for Personalized Vaccination Immunotherapy of Cancer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2404956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mao, L.Z.; Ma, P.Q.; Luo, X.; Cheng, H.W.; Wang, Z.X.; Ye, E.Y.; Loh, X.J.; Wu, Y.L.; Li, Z.B. Stimuli-Responsive Polymeric Nanovaccines Toward Next-Generation Immunotherapy. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 9826–9849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.Y.; Yan, Y.; Guo, X.R.; Lu, A.; Jiang, L.X.; Zhu, Y.J.; Shi, Y.J.; Liu, X.Y.; Wang, J.C. Enhanced Tumor Immunotherapy by Triple Amplification Effects of Nanomedicine on the STING Signaling Pathway in Dendritic Cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2025, 14, 2403143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yan, J.X.; Zhang, C.; Xu, Y.L.; Huang, Z.H.; Ye, Q.Y.; Qian, X.J.; Zhu, L.; Huang, G.M.; Wang, X.Q.; Jiang, W.; et al. GPR34 is a metabolic immune checkpoint for ILC1-mediated antitumor immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2024, 25, 2057–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zou, J.L.; Jiang, C.; Hu, Q.S.; Jia, X.L.; Wang, S.Q.; Wan, S.Y.; Mao, Y.Q.; Zhang, D.P.; Zhang, P.; Dai, B.; et al. Tumor microenvironment-responsive engineered hybrid nanomedicine for photodynamic-immunotherapy via multi-pronged amplification of reactive oxygen species. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, J.C.; Wan, R.; Cai, Y.R.; Cai, S.L.; Wu, L.; Li, B.L.; Duan, J.C.; Cheng, Y.; Li, X.L.; Wang, X.C.; et al. Circulating tumor DNA-based stratification strategy for chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Cell 2024, 42, 1598–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Piper, M.; Hoen, M.; Darragh, L.B.; Knitz, M.W.; Nguyen, D.; Gadwa, J.; Durini, G.; Karakoc, I.; Grier, A.; Neupert, B.; et al. Simultaneous targeting of PD-1 and IL-2Rbg with radiation therapy inhibits pancreatic cancer growth and metastasis. Cancer Cell 2023, 41, 950–969.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guan, X.; Wang, F.; Zhou, B.; Sang, X.; Zhao, Q. The nutritional function of active polysaccharides from marine animals: A review. Food Biosci. 2024, 58, 103693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, H.; Jiang, F.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Li, L.; Yan, J. Modulatory effects of polysaccharides from plants, marine algae and edible mushrooms on gut microbiota and related health benefits: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 204, 169–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gurpilhares, D.d.B.; Cinelli, L.P.; Simas, N.K.; Pessoa Jr, A.; Sette, L.D. Marine prebiotics: Polysaccharides and oligosaccharides obtained by using microbial enzymes. Food Chem. 2019, 280, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, R.L.; Kearney, R. Specific tumor immunity induced with mitomycin C-treated syngeneic tumor cells (MCT). Effects of carrageenan and trypan blue on MCT-induced immunity in mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1980, 64, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
  15. Song, S.; Peng, H.; Wang, Q.; Liu, Z.; Dong, X.; Wen, C.; Ai, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, B. Inhibitory activities of marine sulfated polysaccharides against SARS-CoV-2. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 7415–7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cheong, K.L.; Yu, B.; Chen, J.; Zhong, S. A Comprehensive Review of the Cardioprotective Effect of Marine Algae Polysaccharide on the Gut Microbiota. Foods 2022, 11, 3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hentati, F.; Delattre, C.; Ursu, A.V.; Desbrières, J.; Le Cerf, D.; Gardarin, C.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P.; Pierre, G. Structural characterization and antioxidant activity of water-soluble polysaccharides from the Tunisian brown seaweed Cystoseira compressa. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rajasekar, P.; Palanisamy, S.; Anjali, R.; Vinosha, M.; Elakkiya, M.; Marudhupandi, T.; Tabarsa, M.; You, S.; Prabhu, N.M. Isolation and structural characterization of sulfated polysaccharide from Spirulina platensis and its bioactive potential: In vitro antioxidant, antibacterial activity and Zebrafish growth and reproductive performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 141, 809–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, Y.P.; Pu, Q.Y.; Zhao, Q.L.; Zhou, Y.F.; Jiang, X.X.; Han, T. Effects of Fucoidan Isolated From Laminaria japonica on Immune Response and Gut Microbiota in Cyclophosphamide-Treated Mice. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 916618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hwang, P.A.; Lin, H.T.V.; Lin, H.Y.; Lo, S.K. Dietary Supplementation with Low-Molecular-Weight Fucoidan Enhances Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses and Protects against Mycoplasma pneumoniae Antigen Stimulation. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Y.; Yan, B.; Wang, Z.; Li, M.; Zhao, W. Natural Polysaccharides with Immunomodulatory Activities. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, H.; Hunter, R.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, H.; Wang, J.; Yue, Y.; Geng, L.; Wu, N. The application of marine polysaccharides to antitumor nanocarriers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 342, 122407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ju, H.; Yu, C.; Liu, W.; Li, H.-H.; Fu, Z.; Wu, Y.-C.; Gong, P.-X.; Li, H.-J. Polysaccharides from marine resources exhibit great potential in the treatment of tumor: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2023, 5, 100308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cardoso, M.J.; Costa, R.R.; Mano, J.F. Marine Origin Polysaccharides in Drug Delivery Systems. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deng, Z.Z.; Qishan, S.; Zhang, Q.B.; Wang, J.; Yue, Y.; Geng, L.H.; Wu, N. Low molecular weight fucoidan LF2 improves the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and enhances the anti-pancreatic cancer activity of oxaliplatin. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 173, 116360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, S.Y.; Zhou, T.; Shabbir, I.; Choi, J.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, M.; Aweya, J.J.; Tan, K.; Zhong, S.Y.; Cheong, K.L. Marine algal polysaccharides: Multifunctional bioactive ingredients for cosmetic formulations. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 353, 123276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, X.Y.; Liu, Z.C.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Shi, F.L.; Cheong, K.L.; Teng, B. Immunostimulatory Effects of Polysaccharides from Spirulina platensis In Vivo and Vitro and Their Activation Mechanism on RAW246.7 Macrophages. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, P.; Gu, T.W.; Rao, Y.Y.; Liang, W.M.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, H.G.; Lu, J.D.; She, J.L.; Guo, J.M.; Yang, W.; et al. A novel marine-derived anti-acute kidney injury agent targeting peroxiredoxin 1 and its nanodelivery strategy based on ADME optimization. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2024, 14, 3232–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, Y.; Ma, X.L.; Hu, H. Marine Polysaccharides as a Versatile Biomass for the Construction of Nano Drug Delivery Systems. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bezbaruah, R.; Chavda, V.P.; Nongrang, L.; Alom, S.; Deka, K.; Kalita, T.; Ali, F.; Bhattacharjee, B.; Vora, L. Nanoparticle-Based Delivery Systems for Vaccines. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Shabana, S.; Hamouda, H.I.; Abdalla, M.; Sharaf, M.; Chi, Z.; Liu, C. Multifunctional nanoparticles based on marine polysaccharides for apremilast delivery to inflammatory macrophages: Preparation, targeting ability, and uptake mechanism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 1709–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hsu, C.-Y.; Allela, O.Q.B.; Hussein, A.M.; Mustafa, M.A.; Kaur, M.; Alaraj, M.; Al-Hussainy, A.F.; Radi, U.K.; Ubaid, M.; Idan, A.H.; et al. Recent advances in polysaccharide-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy: A comprehensive review. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2024, 52, 564–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jia, H.; Li, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, F.; Yang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Man, C. Recent advances in fucoidan-based improved delivery systems: Structure, carrier types and biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 352, 123183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jiang, J.-L.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Ni, W.-X.; Shao, J.-W. Insight on structure-property relationships of carrageenan from marine red algal: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 257, 117642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lu, S.; Na, K.; Wei, J.; Zhang, L.; Guo, X. Alginate oligosaccharides: The structure-function relationships and the directional preparation for application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 284, 119225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, B.; Lan, W.; Xie, J. Chemical modifications in the structure of marine polysaccharide as serviceable food processing and preservation assistant: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 223, 1539–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pramanik, S.; Singh, A.; Abualsoud, B.M.; Deepak, A.; Nainwal, P.; Sargsyan, A.S.; Bellucci, S. From algae to advancements: Laminarin in biomedicine. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 3209–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Deng, Z.; Wu, N.; Suo, Q.; Wang, J.; Yue, Y.; Geng, L.; Zhang, Q. Fucoidan, as an immunostimulator promotes M1 macrophage differentiation and enhances the chemotherapeutic sensitivity of capecitabine in colon cancer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 562–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dai, X.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Xu, Q.; Yang, L.; Gao, F. Nitrogen-phosphorous co-doped carbonized chitosan nanoparticles for chemotherapy and ROS-mediated immunotherapy of intracellular Staphylococcus aureus infection. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 315, 121013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Su, Y.; Chen, L.; Yang, F.; Cheung, P.C.K. Beta-d-glucan-based drug delivery system and its potential application in targeting tumor associated macrophages. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 253, 117258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Christensen, M.D.; Allahgholi, L.; Dobruchowska, J.M.; Moenaert, A.; Guðmundsson, H.; Friðjónsson, Ó.; Karlsson, E.N.; Hreggviðsson, G.; Freysdottir, J. Laminarins and their derivatives affect dendritic cell activation and their crosstalk with T cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 306, 141287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Song, K.; Xu, L.; Zhang, W.; Cai, Y.; Jang, B.; Oh, J.; Jin, J.O. Laminarin promotes anti-cancer immunity by the maturation of dendritic cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 38554–38567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Han, M.; Sun, P.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.; Nie, J. Structural characterization of a polysaccharide from Sargassum henslowianum, and its immunomodulatory effect on gastric cancer rat. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 1120–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhao, X.; Jiao, G.; Yang, Y.; Li, M.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Cai, C.; Li, G.; Hao, J.; Yu, G. Structure and immunomodulatory activity of a sulfated agarose with pyruvate and xylose substitutes from Polysiphonia senticulosa Harvey. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 176, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Park, H.B.; Hwang, J.; Zhang, W.; Go, S.; Kim, J.; Choi, I.; You, S.; Jin, J.O. Polysaccharide from Codium fragile Induces Anti-Cancer Immunity by Activating Natural Killer Cells. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fan, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ding, X.; Cui, J.; Wang, G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L. Alginate Enhances Memory Properties of Antitumor CD8(+) T Cells by Promoting Cellular Antioxidation. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 4717–4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Park, H.B.; Hwang, J.; Lim, S.M.; Zhang, W.; Jin, J.O. Dendritic cell-mediated cancer immunotherapy with Ecklonia cava fucoidan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 159, 941–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Geng, H.; Chen, M.; Guo, C.; Wang, W.; Chen, D. Marine polysaccharides: Biological activities and applications in drug delivery systems. Carbohydr. Res. 2024, 538, 109071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jiang, S.; Yin, H.; Li, R.; Shi, W.; Mou, J.; Yang, J. The activation effects of fucoidan from sea cucumber Stichopus chloronotus on RAW264.7 cells via TLR2/4-NF-κB pathway and its structure-activity relationship. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 270, 118353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Chen, J.; Zhou, Z.; Zheng, C.; Liu, Y.; Hao, R.; Ji, X.; Xi, Q.; Shen, J.; Li, Z. Chitosan oligosaccharide regulates AMPK and STAT1 pathways synergistically to mediate PD-L1 expression for cancer chemoimmunotherapy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 277, 118869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, D.-Y.; Park, C.W.; Lee, S.J.; Park, H.-R.; Seo, D.B.; Park, J.Y.; Park, J.; Shin, K.-S. Immunostimulating and Antimetastatic Effects of Polysaccharides Purified from Ginseng Berry. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2019, 47, 823–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zong, S.; Li, J.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Chen, X.; Ye, M. Lachnum polysaccharide suppresses S180 sarcoma by boosting anti-tumor immune responses and skewing tumor-associated macrophages toward M1 phenotype. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 144, 1022–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jiang, S.; Ma, J.; Li, Y.; Lu, B.; Du, J.; Xu, J.; Qin, Z.; Ning, T.; Dong, C. A polysaccharide from native Curcuma kwangsiensis and its mechanism of reversing MDSC-induced suppressive function. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 297, 120020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Muliawan, G.K.; Lee, T.K. The roles of cancer stem cell-derived secretory factors in shaping the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1400112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, C.; Dang, D.; Cong, L.; Sun, H.; Cong, X. Pivotal factors associated with the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and melanoma metastasis. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 4710–4720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tian, L.; Li, C.M.; Li, Y.F.; Huang, T.M.; Chao, N.X.; Luo, G.R.; Mo, F.R. Laminarin from Seaweed (Laminaria japonica) Inhibits Hepatocellular Carcinoma Through Upregulating Senescence Marker Protein-30. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2020, 35, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Miao, H.Q.; Elkin, M.; Aingorn, E.; Ishai-Michaeli, R.; Stein, C.A.; Vlodavsky, I. Inhibition of heparanase activity and tumor metastasis by laminarin sulfate and synthetic phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides. Int. J. Cancer 1999, 83, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Park, J.; Gerber, M.H.; Babensee, J.E. Phenotype and polarization of autologous T cells by biomaterial-treated dendritic cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2015, 103, 170–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, Y.; Wang, N.; Tian, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, J.; Leng, X.; Zhang, H. Synergy of Polydopamine Nanovaccine and Endostar Alginate Hydrogel for Improving Antitumor Immune Responses Against Colon Tumor. Int. J. Nanomed. 2022, 17, 4791–4805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, Z.; Guo, H.; Wu, Y.; Yu, H.; Yang, H.; Li, J. Local nasal immunotherapy: Efficacy of Dermatophagoides farinae-chitosan vaccine in murine asthma. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2009, 150, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sun, J.; Sun, J.; Song, B.; Zhang, L.; Shao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, D.; Zhang, Y.; Qu, X. Fucoidan inhibits CCL22 production through NF-kappaB pathway in M2 macrophages: A potential therapeutic strategy for cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Karuppan Perumal, M.K.; Gandhi, D.; Rajasekaran, M.B.S.; Kudiyarasu, S.; Renuka, R.R.; Julius, A.; Samrot, A.V.; Lakshmi Narayanan, A. Inhibition of angiogenesis using laminarin a natural polysaccharide from brown seaweeds—A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 54, 102947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, Z.; Yao, Y.; Ding, Z.; Chen, X.; Xie, K.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Wu, X.; Xu, J.; et al. Antitumour immunity mediated by mannan-modified adenovirus vectors expressing VE-cadherin. Vaccine 2011, 29, 4218–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Salim, S.A.; Salaheldin, T.A.; Elmazar, M.M.; Abdel-Aziz, A.F.; Kamoun, E.A. Smart biomaterials for enhancing cancer therapy by overcoming tumor hypoxia: A review. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 33835–33851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, D.; Li, Q.; Chen, X.; Nie, X.; Xue, F.; Xu, W.; Luan, Y. An Injectable Hydrogel to Modulate T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy. Small 2022, 18, e2202663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chiang, C.S.; Lin, Y.J.; Lee, R.; Lai, Y.H.; Cheng, H.W.; Hsieh, C.H.; Shyu, W.C.; Chen, S.Y. Combination of fucoidan-based magnetic nanoparticles and immunomodulators enhances tumour-localized immunotherapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chen, C.; Hu, M.; Cao, Y.; Zhu, B.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Shao, J.; Zhou, S.; Shan, P.; Zheng, C.; et al. Combination of a STING Agonist and Photothermal Therapy Using Chitosan Hydrogels for Cancer Immunotherapy. Biomacromolecules 2023, 24, 2790–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Adibfar, S.; Masjedi, A.; Nazer, A.; Rashidi, B.; Karpisheh, V.; Izadi, S.; Hassannia, H.; Gholizadeh Navashenaq, J.; Mohammadi, H.; Hojjat-Farsangi, M.; et al. Combined inhibition of EZH2 and CD73 molecules by folic acid-conjugated SPION-TMC nanocarriers loaded with siRNA molecules prevents TNBC progression and restores anti-tumor responses. Life Sci. 2022, 309, 121008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lima, B.V.; Oliveira, M.J.; Barbosa, M.A.; Goncalves, R.M.; Castro, F. Immunomodulatory potential of chitosan-based materials for cancer therapy: A systematic review of in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 3209–3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Crowe, J.H.; Crowe, L.M.; Wolkers, W.F.; Oliver, A.E.; Ma, X.; Auh, J.H.; Tang, M.; Zhu, S.; Norris, J.; Tablin, F. Stabilization of dry Mammalian cells: Lessons from nature. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2005, 45, 810–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Argenziano, M.; Occhipinti, S.; Scomparin, A.; Angelini, C.; Novelli, F.; Soster, M.; Giovarelli, M.; Cavalli, R. Exploring chitosan-shelled nanobubbles to improve HER2 + immunotherapy via dendritic cell targeting. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2022, 12, 2007–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. He, X.Y.; Liu, B.Y.; Wu, J.L.; Ai, S.L.; Zhuo, R.X.; Cheng, S.X. A Dual Macrophage Targeting Nanovector for Delivery of Oligodeoxynucleotides To Overcome Cancer-Associated Immunosuppression. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 42566–42576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, R.; Xu, K.; Li, H.; Feng, Y.; Xiang, G.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, C. Laminarin-mediated oral delivery of miRNA-223 for targeted macrophage polarization in inflammatory bowel disease. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 311, 143052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, X.; Ren, X.; Zhou, L.; Liu, K.; Deng, L.; Qing, Q.; Li, J.; Zhi, F.; Li, M. Tollip Orchestrates Macrophage Polarization to Alleviate Intestinal Mucosal Inflammation. J. Crohns Colitis 2022, 16, 1151–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dong, S.; Guo, X.; Han, F.; He, Z.; Wang, Y. Emerging role of natural products in cancer immunotherapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2022, 12, 1163–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kim, D.; Jo, S.; Lee, D.; Kim, S.M.; Seok, J.M.; Yeo, S.J.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.J.; Lee, K.; Kim, T.D.; et al. NK cells encapsulated in micro/macropore-forming hydrogels via 3D bioprinting for tumor immunotherapy. Biomater. Res. 2023, 27, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chen, S.; Ding, R.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, R.; Gao, X.D. Immunomodulatory effects of polysaccharide from marine fungus Phoma herbarum YS4108 on T cells and dendritic cells. Mediat. Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 738631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ghasemi-Chaleshtari, M.; Kiaie, S.H.; Irandoust, M.; Karami, H.; Nabi Afjadi, M.; Ghani, S.; Aghaei Vanda, N.; Ghaderi Sede, M.J.; Ahmadi, A.; Masjedi, A.; et al. Concomitant blockade of A2AR and CTLA-4 by siRNA-loaded polyethylene glycol-chitosan-alginate nanoparticles synergistically enhances antitumor T-cell responses. J. Cell Physiol. 2020, 235, 10068–10080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Esmaily, M.; Masjedi, A.; Hallaj, S.; Nabi Afjadi, M.; Malakotikhah, F.; Ghani, S.; Ahmadi, A.; Sojoodi, M.; Hassannia, H.; Atyabi, F.; et al. Blockade of CTLA-4 increases anti-tumor response inducing potential of dendritic cell vaccine. J. Control Release 2020, 326, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fathi, M.; Bahmanpour, S.; Barshidi, A.; Rasouli, H.; Karoon Kiani, F.; Mahmoud Salehi Khesht, A.; Izadi, S.; Rashidi, B.; Kermanpour, S.; Mokhtarian, R.; et al. Simultaneous blockade of TIGIT and HIF-1alpha induces synergistic anti-tumor effect and decreases the growth and development of cancer cells. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 101, 108288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jin, Q.; Zhu, W.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, J.; Shen, J.; Liu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Q. Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery of Inhaled Immunotherapeutics for Treating Lung Metastasis. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2007557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, Y.; Liu, F.; Tan, L.; Li, X.; Dai, Z.; Cheng, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Wang, L.; et al. LncRNA-edited biomimetic nanovaccines combined with anti-TIM-3 for augmented immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. J. Control Release 2023, 361, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chen, Z.; Wen, T.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; Qin, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wang, D.; Liu, A.; et al. Co-delivery of immunochemotherapeutic by classified targeting based on chitosan and cyclodextrin derivatives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 226, 1396–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sun, L.; Shen, F.; Tian, L.; Tao, H.; Xiong, Z.; Xu, J.; Liu, Z. ATP-Responsive Smart Hydrogel Releasing Immune Adjuvant Synchronized with Repeated Chemotherapy or Radiotherapy to Boost Antitumor Immunity. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2007910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Tahmasebi, S.; Farmanbordar, H.; Mohammadi, R. Synthesis of magnetic bio-nanocomposite hydrogel beads based on sodium alginate and β-cyclodextrin: Potential pH-responsive oral delivery anticancer systems for colorectal cancer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 305, 140748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Foroutan, R.; Mohammadzadeh, A.; Javanbakht, S.; Mohammadi, R.; Ghorbani, M. Alginate/magnetic hydroxyapatite bio-nanocomposite hydrogel bead as a pH-responsive oral drug carrier for potential colon cancer therapy. Results Chem. 2025, 15, 102177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tahmasebi, S.; Mohammadi, R. Green synthesis of pH-sensitive magnetic bio-nanocomposite hydrogel based on galactomannan and sodium alginate for targeted colorectal cancer drug delivery. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2025, 10, 100892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tahmasebi, S.; Mohammadi, R. Synthesizing of pH-sensitive bio-nanocomposite hydrogels based on okra polysaccharide and sodium alginate for targeted colorectal cancer drug delivery with antibacterial and antioxidant properties. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2025, 11, 100890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Patel, T.; Himaja, A.; Biswas, S.; Ghosh, B. Dual Stimuli-Responsive Gemcitabine-Conjugated Alginate-Chitosan Nanoparticles for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy: A Smart Approach. Bioconjugate Chem. 2025, 36, 2037–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tripathi, A.; Pandey, V.K.; Rustagi, S.; Lai, W.-F.; Samrot, A.V. Alginate-based NPs for targeted ovarian cancer therapy: Navigating current progress and biomedical applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 319, 145365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, B.Y.; Lin, T.Y.; Lai, Y.J.; Chiu, T.H.; Yeh, Y.C. Engineering Multiresponsive Alginate/PNIPAM/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposite Hydrogels as On-Demand Drug Delivery Platforms. Small 2025, 21, e2407420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Malektaj, H.; Drozdov, A.D.; Gurikov, P.; Schroeter, B.; Fini, E.; deClaville Christiansen, J. Multivalent ion-crosslinked alginate–montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogels for hydrophilic drug release. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2025, 112, 107275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rajwar, T.K.; Sahoo, R.K.; Halder, J.; Mishra, A.; Satapathy, B.; Saha, I.; Sahoo, G.P.; Mahanty, R.; Rai, V.K.; Pradhan, D.; et al. Doxorubicin loaded salicylic acid crosslinked chitosan nanoparticles as postsurgical implants for breast cancer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 320, 145874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kapoor, D.U.; Pareek, A.; Patel, S.; Fareed, M.; Alsaidan, O.A.; Prajapati, B.G. Advances in cancer therapy using fluorinated chitosan: A promising nanoplatform for drug delivery. Med. Oncol. 2025, 42, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Amparo, T.R.; Anunciação, K.d.F.d.; Almeida, T.C.; Sousa, L.R.D.; Xavier, V.F.; Seibert, J.B.; Barboza, A.P.M.; Vieira, P.M.d.A.; dos Santos, O.D.H.; da Silva, G.N.; et al. Chitosan Nanoparticles Enhance the Antiproliferative Effect of Lapachol in Urothelial Carcinoma Cell Lines. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Blebea, N.-M.; Pușcașu, C.; Vlad, R.-A.; Hancu, G. Chitosan-Based Gel Development: Extraction, Gelation Mechanisms, and Biomedical Applications. Gels 2025, 11, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. dos Santos, A.M.; Liszbinski, R.B.; Carvalho, S.G.; Junior, A.G.T.; Chorilli, M.; de Jesus, M.B.; Gremião, M.P.D. 5-Fluorouracil-loaded chitosan nanoparticles conjugated with methotrexate for targeted therapy of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 287, 138342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Alemi, P.S.; Mohamadali, M.; Arabahmadi, S.; Irani, S.; Sharifi, F. Carboxymethyl Chitosan and Chitosan as a Bioactive Delivery System: A Review. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2025, e2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nabipour, H.; Aliakbari, F.; Volkening, K.; Strong, M.J.; Rohani, S. Novel metal-organic framework coated with chitosan-κ-carrageenan as a platform for curcumin delivery to cancer cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 301, 140027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. El-Maadawy, M.W.; Mohamed, R.R.; Hanna, D.H. Preparation of carrageenan/ chitosan-based (N,N,N-trimeth(yl chitosan chloride) silver nanocomposites as pH sensitive carrier for effective controlled curcumin delivery in cancer cells. OpenNano 2022, 7, 100050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hanna, D.H.; El-Mazaly, M.H.; Mohamed, R.R. Synthesis of biodegradable antimicrobial pH-sensitive silver nanocomposites reliant on chitosan and carrageenan derivatives for 5-fluorouracil drug delivery toward HCT116 cancer cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jafari, H.; Namazi, H. κ-carrageenan coated magnetic hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/chitosan nanoparticles as a pH-sensitive nanocarrier for efficient methotrexate release. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 322, 146750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fathi, R.; Mohammadi, R. Preparation of pH-responsive magnetic nanocomposite hydrogels based on k-carrageenan/chitosan/silver nanoparticles: Antibacterial carrier for potential targeted anticancer drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 246, 125546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Karimi, M.H.; Mahdavinia, G.R.; Massoumi, B. pH-controlled sunitinib anticancer release from magnetic chitosan nanoparticles crosslinked with κ-carrageenan. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 91, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Singh, S.; Pal, K. Polyphenol modified CuO nanorods capped by kappa-carrageenan for controlled paclitaxel release in furnishing targeted chemotherapy in breast carcinoma cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 255, 127893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Wathoni, N.; Meylina, L.; Rusdin, A.; Mohammed, A.F.A.; Tirtamie, D.; Herdiana, Y.; Motoyama, K.; Panatarani, C.; Joni, I.M.; Lesmana, R.; et al. The Potential Cytotoxic Activity Enhancement of α-Mangostin in Chitosan-Kappa Carrageenan-Loaded Nanoparticle against MCF-7 Cell Line. Polymers 2021, 13, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Karabatak, A.; Danışman-Kalındemirtaş, F.; Tan, E.; Erdem-Kuruca, S.; Karakuş, S. Kappa carrageenan/PEG-CuO nanoparticles as a multifunctional nanoplatform: Digital colorimetric biosensor and anticancer drug nanocarrier. Appl. Phys. A 2022, 128, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ma, M.; Yu, C.; Liu, H.; Lv, X.; Zhu, H.; Tang, W.; Teng, G.; Xiong, F. Methacrylated Carrageenan/Gelatin Interpenetrating Network Microspheres Loaded with Targeted Drugs and combined with PD-L1 Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 42893–42914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Huang, Y.; Lei, L.; Long, J.; Luo, J.; Yang, L.; Lin, F.; Liang, R.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Cao, J.; et al. Spatially Targeted PD-L1 Blockade for Restoring Exhausted Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Rejuvenation to Potentiate Multimodal-Immune Synergistic Therapies for Breast Cancer Treatment. Small 2025, 21, e2410953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Khan, S.H.; Anees, M.; Zofair, S.F.F.; Rasool, F.; Khan, M.A.; Moin, S.; Younus, H. Fucoidan based polymeric nanoparticles encapsulating epirubicin: A novel and effective chemotherapeutic formulation against colorectal cancer. Int. J. Pharm. 2024, 664, 124622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Pai, F.-T.; Lin, W.J. Synergistic cytotoxicity of irinotecan combined with polysaccharide-based nanoparticles for colorectal carcinoma. Biomater. Adv. 2023, 153, 213577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Liu, X.; Diao, N.; Song, S.; Wang, W.; Cao, M.; Yang, W.; Guo, C.; Chen, D. Inflammatory macrophage reprogramming strategy of fucoidan microneedles-mediated ROS-responsive polymers for rheumatoid arthritis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 271, 132442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lee, Z.-H.; Lee, M.-F.; Chen, J.-H.; Tsou, M.-H.; Wu, Z.-Y.; Lee, C.-Z.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Lin, S.-M.; Lin, H.-M. Fucoidan with three functions extracted from Sargassum aquifolium integrated rice-husk synthesis dual-imaging mesoporous silica nanoparticle. J. Nanobiotechnology 2022, 20, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. DuRoss, A.N.; Landry, M.R.; Thomas, C.R., Jr.; Neufeld, M.J.; Sun, C. Fucoidan-coated nanoparticles target radiation-induced P-selectin to enhance chemoradiotherapy in murine colorectal cancer. Cancer Lett. 2021, 500, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Cui, D.; Ma, J.; Liang, T.; Sun, L.; Meng, L.; Liang, T.; Li, Q. Selenium nanoparticles fabricated in laminarin polysaccharides solutions exert their cytotoxicities in HepG2 cells by inhibiting autophagy and promoting apoptosis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 137, 829–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Zargarzadeh, M.; Amaral, A.J.R.; Custódio, C.A.; Mano, J.F. Biomedical applications of laminarin. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 232, 115774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Du, H.; Aslam, M.; Wang, W.; Chen, W.; Li, T.; Liu, Z.; Liu, X. Laminarin, a Major Polysaccharide in Stramenopiles. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yao, W.; Lin, Y.; Xu, N.; Xi, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, L. Laminarin-coated Genexol-PM pH sensitive nanomicelles targeting miR-620/IRF2BP2 axis for inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis in Invitro thyroid carcinoma. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 310, 143198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhang, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhuang, Y.; He, T.; Wu, X.; Su, L.; Kang, J.; Chang, J.; Wang, H. Sodium Alginate Hydrogel-Mediated Cancer Immunotherapy for Postoperative In Situ Recurrence and Metastasis. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 5717–5726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cao, Y.; Liu, S.; Ma, Y.; Ma, L.; Zu, M.; Sun, J.; Dai, F.; Duan, L.; Xiao, B. Oral Nanomotor-Enabled Mucus Traverse and Tumor Penetration for Targeted Chemo-Sono-Immunotherapy against Colon Cancer. Small 2022, 18, e2203466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, Y.; Fang, M.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Song, Y.; Shi, J.; Li, W.; Wu, G.; Ren, J.; Wang, Z.; et al. Hydrogel dual delivered celecoxib and anti-PD-1 synergistically improve antitumor immunity. Oncoimmunology 2016, 5, e1074374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Verbeke, C.S.; Gordo, S.; Schubert, D.A.; Lewin, S.A.; Desai, R.M.; Dobbins, J.; Wucherpfennig, K.W.; Mooney, D.J. Multicomponent Injectable Hydrogels for Antigen-Specific Tolerogenic Immune Modulation. Adv. Heal. Mater. 2017, 6, 1600773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Li, Z.; Ding, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Mo, F.; Wang, Y.; Chen-Mayfield, T.J.; Sondel, P.M.; Hong, S.; Hu, Q. Depletion of tumor associated macrophages enhances local and systemic platelet-mediated anti-PD-1 delivery for post-surgery tumor recurrence treatment. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Han, J.; Bhatta, R.; Liu, Y.; Bo, Y.; Wang, H. In Situ Dendritic Cell Recruitment and T Cell Activation for Cancer Immunotherapy. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 954955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Cheng, Z.; Xue, C.; Liu, M.; Cheng, Z.; Tian, G.; Li, M.; Xue, R.; Yao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Z. Injectable microenvironment-responsive hydrogels with redox-activatable supramolecular prodrugs mediate ferroptosis-immunotherapy for postoperative tumor treatment. Acta Biomater. 2023, 169, 289–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhu, L.; Wang, X.; Ding, M.; Yu, N.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, J.; Li, J. Prodrug-loaded semiconducting polymer hydrogels for deep-tissue sono-immunotherapy of orthotopic glioblastoma. Biomater. Sci. 2023, 11, 6823–6833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ding, M.; Fan, Y.; Lv, Y.; Liu, J.; Yu, N.; Kong, D.; Sun, H.; Li, J. A prodrug hydrogel with tumor microenvironment and near-infrared light dual-responsive action for synergistic cancer immunotherapy. Acta Biomater. 2022, 149, 334–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, Z.; Han, X.; Sun, G.; Yu, M.; Qin, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, D. Advances in cancer diagnosis and therapy by alginate-based multifunctional hydrogels: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 283, 137707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Zhang, J.; Tang, J.; Shi, S.; He, J.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Zeng, X.; Pang, J.; Wu, C. Preparation and characterization of pH-sensitive calcium alginate hydrogel beads as delivery carriers for the controlled release of fucoxanthin. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 163, 111106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Peanparkdee, M.; Janchai, P.; Aksornsri, T.; Vaithanomsat, P. Design and evaluation of bromelain-encapsulated alginate beads reinforced with gum Arabic: Formulation, characterization, and stability in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 19, 101698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhang, F.; Zheng, X.; Ma, Y.; Nan, W.; Wu, W.; Chu, Z.; Sun, X.; Huang, J.; Muratkhan, M.; Yue, F.; et al. Sodium alginate/low methoxyl pectin composite hydrogel beads prepared via gas-shearing technology for enhancing the colon-targeted delivery of probiotics and modulating gut microbiota. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 300, 140375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Hashem, M.S.; Sobh, R.A.; Fahim, A.M.; Elsayed, G.H. Alginate sulfonamide hydrogel beads for 5-fluorouracil delivery: Antitumor activity, cytotoxicity assessment, and theoretical investigation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 282, 136573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gomathi, T.; Suganya, R.; Joseph, J.J.; Pandiaraj, S.; Alibrahim, K.A.; Alodhayb, A.N.; Rajakumar, G.; Viswanathan, D.; Thiruvengadam, M.; Shobha, K.; et al. Development and evaluation of biodegradable alginate beads loaded with sorafenib for cancer treatment. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 702, 135083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chernykh, I.N.; Gopin, A.V.; Evdokimov, A.A.; Kharlanov, A.N.; Šandalová, S.; Nikolaev, A.L. Novel yttrium-90 carriers based on enzymatically mineralized calcium and yttrium alginate beads. Surf. Interfaces 2025, 69, 106691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Pan, C.T.; Yu, R.S.; Yang, C.J.; Chen, L.R.; Wen, Z.H.; Chen, N.Y.; Ou, H.Y.; Yu, C.Y.; Shiue, Y.L. Sustained-Release and pH-Adjusted Alginate Microspheres-Encapsulated Doxorubicin Inhibit the Viabilities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Derived Cells. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Bajpai, S.K.; Sharma, S. Investigation of swelling/degradation behaviour of alginate beads crosslinked with Ca2+ and Ba2+ ions. React. Funct. Polym. 2004, 59, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yang, S.; Mu, C.; Liu, T.; Pei, P.; Shen, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, G.; Chen, L.; Yang, K. Radionuclide-Labeled Microspheres for Radio-Immunotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Adv. Heal. Mater. 2023, 12, e2300944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. de las Heras, A.I.; Rodriguez Saint-Jean, S.; Perez-Prieto, S.I. Immunogenic and protective effects of an oral DNA vaccine against infectious pancreatic necrosis virus in fish. Fish. Shellfish. Immunol. 2010, 28, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Stewart, S.; Arminan, A.; He, X. Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery of Cryoprotectants for Cryopreservation. Cryo Lett. 2020, 41, 308–316. [Google Scholar]
  140. Chen, G.; Lv, Y. Nanotechnology-Based Cryopreservation of Cellscaffold Constructs: A New Breakthrough to Clinical Application. CryoLetters 2016, 37, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  141. Borges, O.; Borchard, G.; Verhoef, J.C.; de Sousa, A.; Junginger, H.E. Preparation of coated nanoparticles for a new mucosal vaccine delivery system. Int. J. Pharm. 2005, 299, 155–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Marrella, A.; Dondero, A.; Aiello, M.; Casu, B.; Olive, D.; Regis, S.; Bottino, C.; Pende, D.; Meazza, R.; Caluori, G.; et al. Cell-Laden Hydrogel as a Clinical-Relevant 3D Model for Analyzing Neuroblastoma Growth, Immunophenotype, and Susceptibility to Therapies. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. De Dios-Figueroa, G.T.; Aguilera-Marquez, J.D.R.; Garcia-Uriostegui, L.; Hernandez-Gutierrez, R.; Camacho-Villegas, T.A.; Lugo-Fabres, P.H. Embedded Living HER2+ Cells in a 3D Gelatin-Alginate Hydrogel as an In Vitro Model for Immunotherapy Delivery for Breast Cancer. Polymers 2023, 15, 3726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Fletes-Vargas, G.; Espinosa-Andrews, H.; Cervantes-Uc, J.M.; Limón-Rocha, I.; Luna-Bárcenas, G.; Vázquez-Lepe, M.; Morales-Hernández, N.; Jiménez-Ávalos, J.A.; Mejía-Torres, D.G.; Ramos-Martínez, P.; et al. Porous Chitosan Hydrogels Produced by Physical Crosslinking: Physicochemical, Structural, and Cytotoxic Properties. Polymers 2023, 15, 2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Rahmatpour, A.; Alizadeh, A.H. Biofilm hydrogel derived from physical crosslinking (self-assembly) of xanthan gum and chitosan for removing Cd(2+), Ni(2+), and Cu(2+) from aqueous solution. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 266, 131394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Chen, C.; Wang, L.; Deng, L.; Hu, R.; Dong, A. Performance optimization of injectable chitosan hydrogel by combining physical and chemical triple crosslinking structure. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2013, 101, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Lin, Y.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Guo, F.; Miao, Q.; Huang, H. A composite hydrogel scaffold based on collagen and carboxymethyl chitosan for cartilage regeneration through one-step chemical crosslinking. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 226, 706–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Jiang, L.; Tian, S.; Xie, Y.; Lv, X.; Sun, S. High Strength, Conductivity, and Bacteriostasis of the P(AM-co-AA)/Chitosan Quaternary Ammonium Salt Composite Hydrogel through Ionic Crosslinking and Hydrogen Bonding. Langmuir 2023, 39, 8698–8709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yan, K.; Wan, Y.; Xu, F.; Lu, J.; Yang, C.; Li, X.; Lu, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, D. Ionic crosslinking of alginate/carboxymethyl chitosan fluorescent hydrogel for bacterial detection and sterilization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 302, 120427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yang, J.; Liang, G.; Xiang, T.; Situ, W. Effect of crosslinking processing on the chemical structure and biocompatibility of a chitosan-based hydrogel. Food Chem. 2021, 354, 129476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Long, W.; Li, S.; Yang, Y.; Chen, A.; Xu, M.; Zhai, H.; Cai, T.; Peng, Y. Self-Cross-Linked Chitosan/Albumin-Bound Nanoparticle Hydrogel for Inhibition of Postsurgery Malignant Glioma Recurrence. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 56774–56785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Gu, J.; Zhao, G.; Yu, J.; Xu, P.; Yan, J.; Jin, Z.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.W.; Wang, Y. Injectable pH-responsive hydrogel for combinatorial chemoimmunotherapy tailored to the tumor microenvironment. J. Nanobiotechnology 2022, 20, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Wu, H.; Wei, G.; Luo, L.; Li, L.; Gao, Y.; Tan, X.; Wang, S.; Chang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wei, Y.; et al. Ginsenoside Rg3 nanoparticles with permeation enhancing based chitosan derivatives were encapsulated with doxorubicin by thermosensitive hydrogel and anti-cancer evaluation of peritumoral hydrogel injection combined with PD-L1 antibody. Biomater. Res. 2022, 26, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Gao, C.; Cheng, K.; Li, Y.; Gong, R.; Zhao, X.; Nie, G.; Ren, H. Injectable Immunotherapeutic Hydrogel Containing RNA-Loaded Lipid Nanoparticles Reshapes Tumor Microenvironment for Pancreatic Cancer Therapy. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 8801–8809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Chen, W.R.; Liu, H.; Nordquist, J.A.; Nordquist, R.E. Tumour cell damage and leucocyte infiltration after laser immunotherapy treatment. Lasers Med. Sci. 2000, 15, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Jiang, H.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, F.; Jiang, W. Preparation and characterization of curdlan-chitosan conjugate nanoparticles as mucosal adjuvants for intranasal influenza H1N1 subunit vaccine. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 266, 131289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Li, D.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, X.; Liu, S.; Li, Y. Fabrication of chitosan-based emulsion as an adjuvant to enhance nasal mucosal immune responses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 272, 132913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Liu, Y.; Long, M.; Wang, Y.; Liang, Z.; Dong, Y.; Qu, M.; Ge, X.; Nan, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, X. Chitosan-alginate/R8 ternary polyelectrolyte complex as an oral protein-based vaccine candidate induce effective mucosal immune responses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 275, 133671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Zhao, Z.; Qiao, S.; Jin, Z.; Li, H.; Yu, H.; Zhang, C.; Yin, T.H.; Zhao, K. Acidified sucralfate encapsulated chitosan derivative nanoparticles as oral vaccine adjuvant delivery enhancing mucosal and systemic immunity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 279, 135424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Li, X.; Min, M.; Du, N.; Gu, Y.; Hode, T.; Naylor, M.; Chen, D.; Nordquist, R.E.; Chen, W.R. Chitin, chitosan, and glycated chitosan regulate immune responses: The novel adjuvants for cancer vaccine. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2013, 2013, 387023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Liang, X.; Li, L.; Li, X.; He, T.; Gong, S.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, M.; Wu, Q.; Gong, C. A spontaneous multifunctional hydrogel vaccine amplifies the innate immune response to launch a powerful antitumor adaptive immune response. Theranostics 2021, 11, 6936–6949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Wei, J.; Xue, W.; Yu, X.; Qiu, X.; Liu, Z. pH Sensitive phosphorylated chitosan hydrogel as vaccine delivery system for intramuscular immunization. J. Biomater. Appl. 2017, 31, 1358–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Chen, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhou, S.; Chen, D.; Zhou, M.; Chen, Q.; Lu, Y.; Cai, N.; Liu, C.; Guo, Y.; et al. Sequentially sustained release of anticarcinogens for postsurgical chemoimmunotherapy. J. Control Release 2022, 350, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Luo, X.; Tang, K.Y.; Wang, Y.Y. Preparation of drug-loaded chitosan microspheres repair materials. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2023, 27, 6489–6495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Mao, Y.; Zhao, M.; Ge, Y.; Fan, J. Novel Alginate-Chitosan Composite Microspheres for Implant Delivery of Vancomycin and In Vivo Evaluation. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2016, 88, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Pahuja, S.; Aggarwal, S.; Sarup, P. Formulation and Characterization of Losartan Loaded Chitosan Microspheres: Effect of Crosslinking Agents. Drug Res. 2021, 71, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Meskelis, L.; Agondi, R.F.; Duarte, L.G.R.; de Carvalho, M.D.; Sato, A.C.K.; Picone, C.S.F. New approaches for modulation of alginate-chitosan delivery properties. Food Res. Int. 2024, 175, 113737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Tan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Rajoka, M.S.R.; Mai, Z.; Bahadur, A.; Mehwish, H.M.; Umair, M.; Zhao, L.; Wu, Y.; Song, X. Jawbones Scaffold Constructed by TGF-β1 and BMP-2 Loaded Chitosan Microsphere Combining with Alg/HA/ICol for Osteogenic-Induced Differentiation. Polymers 2021, 13, 3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Katsarov, P.D.; Pilicheva, B.A.; Manev, H.M.; Lukova, P.K.; Kassarova, M.I. Optimization of Chitosan Microspheres Spray Drying via 32 Full Factorial Design. Folia Med. 2017, 59, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Ogunjimi, A.T.; Fiegel, J.; Brogden, N.K. Design and Characterization of Spray-Dried Chitosan-Naltrexone Microspheres for Microneedle-Assisted Transdermal Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhang, Z.L.; Li, L.J.; Sun, D.; Wang, M.; Shi, J.R.; Yang, D.; Wang, L.H.; Zou, S.C. Preparation and properties of chitosan-based microspheres by spray drying. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 1933–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Zhou, J.; Chen, Y.; Luo, M.; Deng, F.; Lin, S.; Wu, W.; Li, G.; Nan, K. Dual cross-linked chitosan microspheres formulated with spray-drying technique for the sustained release of levofloxacin. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2019, 45, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Jiang, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, L.; Si, S.; Yao, B.; Dai, W.; et al. Re-exposure of chitosan by an inhalable microsphere providing the re-education of TAMs for lung cancer treatment with assistant from sustained H(2)S generation. Int. J. Pharm. 2023, 642, 123142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Jhaveri, J.; Raichura, Z.; Khan, T.; Momin, M.; Omri, A. Chitosan Nanoparticles-Insight into Properties, Functionalization and Applications in Drug Delivery and Theranostics. Molecules 2021, 26, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Yao, X.; Jovevski, J.J.; Todd, M.F.; Xu, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Matosevic, S. Nanoparticle-Mediated Intracellular Protection of Natural Killer Cells Avoids Cryoinjury and Retains Potent Antitumor Functions. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1902938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Lin, L.; He, J.; Li, J.; Xu, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, Y. Chitosan Nanoparticles Strengthen Vgamma9Vdelta2 T-Cell Cytotoxicity Through Upregulation Of Killing Molecules And Cytoskeleton Polarization. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 9325–9336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Tan, M.L.; Choong, P.F.; Dass, C.R. Cancer, chitosan nanoparticles and catalytic nucleic acids. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2009, 61, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Chakraborty, A.; Roy, G.; Swami, B.; Bhaskar, S. Tumor targeted delivery of mycobacterial adjuvant encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles showed potential anti-cancer activity and immune cell activation in tumor microenvironment. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023, 114, 109463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Bastaki, S.; Aravindhan, S.; Ahmadpour Saheb, N.; Afsari Kashani, M.; Evgenievich Dorofeev, A.; Karoon Kiani, F.; Jahandideh, H.; Beigi Dargani, F.; Aksoun, M.; Nikkhoo, A.; et al. Codelivery of STAT3 and PD-L1 siRNA by hyaluronate-TAT trimethyl/thiolated chitosan nanoparticles suppresses cancer progression in tumor-bearing mice. Life Sci. 2021, 266, 118847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Yan, T.; Zhang, H.; Huang, D.; Feng, S.; Fujita, M.; Gao, X.D. Chitosan-Functionalized Graphene Oxide as a Potential Immunoadjuvant. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Yang, X.; Yu, T.; Zeng, Y.; Lian, K.; Zhou, X.; Li, S.; Qiu, G.; Jin, X.; Yuan, H.; Hu, F. Tumor-draining lymph node targeting chitosan micelles as antigen-capturing adjuvants for personalized immunotherapy. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 240, 116270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Korbelik, M.; Banath, J.; Zhang, W.; Gallagher, P.; Hode, T.; Lam, S.S.K.; Chen, W.R. N-dihydrogalactochitosan as immune and direct antitumor agent amplifying the effects of photodynamic therapy and photodynamic therapy-generated vaccines. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 75, 105764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Song, S.; Zhou, F.; Nordquist, R.E.; Carubelli, R.; Liu, H.; Chen, W.R. Glycated chitosan as a new non-toxic immunological stimulant. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2009, 31, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Chen, M.; Quan, G.; Wen, T.; Yang, P.; Qin, W.; Mai, H.; Sun, Y.; Lu, C.; Pan, X.; Wu, C. Cold to Hot: Binary Cooperative Microneedle Array-Amplified Photoimmunotherapy for Eliciting Antitumor Immunity and the Abscopal Effect. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 32259–32269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Qureshi, D.; Nayak, S.K.; Maji, S.; Kim, D.; Banerjee, I.; Pal, K. Carrageenan: A Wonder Polymer from Marine Algae for Potential Drug Delivery Applications. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 1172–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Yegappan, R.; Selvaprithiviraj, V.; Amirthalingam, S.; Jayakumar, R. Carrageenan based hydrogels for drug delivery, tissue engineering and wound healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 198, 385–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Thakur, N.; Singh, B.; Sharma, S.; Kanwar, S.S. Designing carrageenan-based hydrogels for drug delivery applications: Evaluation of physiochemical and biomedical properties. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2024, 32, 100439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Vaid, V.; Jindal, R. RSM-CCD optimized in air synthesis of novel kappa-carrageenan/tamarind kernel powder hybrid polymer network incorporated with inclusion complex of (2-hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin and adenosine for controlled drug delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 67, 102976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Mozaffari, E.; Tanhaei, B.; Khajenoori, M.; Movaghar Khoshkho, S. Unveiling the swelling behavior of κ-carrageenan hydrogels: Influence of composition and physiological environment on drug delivery potential. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2024, 141, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Volod’ko, A.V.; Son, E.Y.; Glazunov, V.P.; Davydova, V.N.; Alexander-Sinkler, E.I.; Aleksandrova, S.A.; Blinova, M.I.; Yermak, I.M. Carrageenan films as promising mucoadhesive ocular drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2024, 237, 113854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Lim, H.-P.; Ooi, C.-W.; Tey, B.-T.; Chan, E.-S. Controlled delivery of oral insulin aspart using pH-responsive alginate/κ-carrageenan composite hydrogel beads. React. Funct. Polym. 2017, 120, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Gu, L.; Mcclements, D.J.; Li, J.; Su, Y.; Li, J. Formulation of alginate/carrageenan microgels to encapsulate, protect and release immunoglobulins: Egg Yolk IgY. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 112, 106349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Negreanu-Pirjol, B.S.; Negreanu-Pirjol, T.; Popoviciu, D.R.; Anton, R.E.; Prelipcean, A.M. Marine Bioactive Compounds Derived from Macroalgae as New Potential Players in Drug Delivery Systems: A Review. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Li, J.; Cai, C.; Yang, C.; Li, J.; Sun, T.; Yu, G. Recent Advances in Pharmaceutical Potential of Brown Algal Polysaccharides and their Derivatives. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 1290–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Li, R.; Pavuluri, S.; Bruggeman, K.; Long, B.M.; Parnell, A.J.; Martel, A.; Parnell, S.R.; Pfeffer, F.M.; Dennison, A.J.; Nicholas, K.R.; et al. Coassembled nanostructured bioscaffold reduces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines to induce apoptosis in epithelial cancer cells. Nanomedicine 2016, 12, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Hwang, P.A.; Lin, X.Z.; Kuo, K.L.; Hsu, F.Y. Fabrication and Cytotoxicity of Fucoidan-Cisplatin Nanoparticles for Macrophage and Tumor Cells. Materials 2017, 10, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Jeon, E.Y.; Choi, D.S.; Choi, S.; Won, J.Y.; Jo, Y.; Kim, H.B.; Jung, Y.; Shin, S.C.; Min, H.; Choi, H.W.; et al. Enhancing adoptive T-cell therapy with fucoidan-based IL-2 delivery microcapsules. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2023, 8, e10362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Jiang, T.; Wang, B.; Wang, T.; Zhang, L.; Chen, X.; Zhao, X. TAM-Hijacked Immunoreaction Rescued by Hypoxia-Pathway-Intervened Strategy for Enhanced Metastatic Cancer Immunotherapy. Small 2023, 20, e2305728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Lin, Z.; Liu, Y.; Gong, X.; Nie, F.; Xu, J.; Guo, Y. Construction of quercetin-fucoidan nanoparticles and their application in cancer chemo-immunotherapy treatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 256, 128057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Zhang, W.; Hwang, J.; Yadav, D.; An, E.K.; Kwak, M.; Lee, P.C.; Jin, J.O. Enhancement of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Mediated Anti-Cancer Immunity by Intranasal Treatment of Ecklonia cava Fucoidan against Metastatic Lung Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Zeng, L.; Zhang, J.; Song, R.; Dong, X.; Wei, Z.; Li, X.; Zeng, X.; Yao, J. Laminarin Alleviates Acute Lung Injury Induced by LPS Through Inhibition of M1 Macrophage Polarisation. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2025, 29, e70440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Ji, C.-F.; Ji, Y.-B.; Meng, D.-Y. Sulfated modification and anti-tumor activity of laminarin. Exp. Ther. Med. 2013, 6, 1259–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Zhou, S.; Qin, H.; Long, Z.; Kong, L.; Ma, J.; Lin, Y.; Lin, H.; Huang, Z.; Li, Z. Effects of laminarin on antioxidant capacity and non-specific immunity of spotted sea bass (Lateolabrax maculatus). Aquac. Rep. 2025, 40, 102549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Li, X.-Y.; Wang, Z.-X.; Li, L.-Z.; Huang, L.; Wu, Y.-C.; Li, H.-J. A review oriented by structure-activity relationship: Preparation, bioactivities, and applications of Laminaria japonica polysaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 328, 147675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Cheong, K.-L.; Sabir, A.; Wang, M.; Zhong, S.; Tan, K. Advancements in the Extraction, Characterization, and Bioactive Potential of Laminaran: A Review. Foods 2025, 14, 1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Custódio, C.A.; Reis, R.L.; Mano, J.F. Photo-Cross-Linked Laminarin-Based Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 1602–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Pradhan, B.; Ki, J.-S. Seaweed-derived laminarin and alginate as potential chemotherapeutical agents: An updated comprehensive review considering cancer treatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 293, 136593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Yu, R.; Song, Z.; Jin, L.; Jiao, L.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Hu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, E.; Zhao, G.; et al. Polyethyleneimine-modified Laminarin nanoparticles as a novel vaccine adjuvant for ovalbumin to enhance the immune responses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 292, 139157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Guo, X.; Zheng, Q.; Gao, W.; Xiao, Y.; Shi, L.; Lin, F.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Wang, L.; et al. Synergistic microglial modulation by laminarin-based platinum nanozymes for potential intracerebral hemorrhage therapy. Biomaterials 2025, 319, 123212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Ramadan, N.E.; Youssef, F.R.; Alshishtawy, A.A.K.; Elshikh, F.M.; Newir, O.; Abdelazeem, S.H.; Ma’ruf, N.K.; Shouman, H.; Ali, S.S.; El-Sheekh, M.M. Marine algal polysaccharides for drug delivery applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 295, 139551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Xie, M.; Zhao, J.; Feng, X.; Gao, X.; Cheng, W.; Kong, L.; Liang, F. Cell membrane-inspired chitosan nanoparticles for prolonged circulation and tumor-targeted drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 304, 140934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Li, Q.; Han, J.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y. PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1070961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Li, J.; Jia, J.; Teng, Y.; Wang, X.; Xia, X.; Song, S.; Zhu, B.; Xia, X. Polysaccharides from Sea Cucumber (Stichopus japonicus) Synergize with Anti-PD1 Immunotherapy to Reduce MC-38 Tumor Burden in Mice Through Shaping the Gut Microbiome. Foods 2025, 14, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Su, W.; Qiu, W.; Li, S.-J.; Wang, S.; Xie, J.; Yang, Q.-C.; Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Z.; Sun, Z.-J. A Dual-Responsive STAT3 Inhibitor Nanoprodrug Combined with Oncolytic Virus Elicits Synergistic Antitumor Immune Responses by Igniting Pyroptosis. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2209379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, T.; Meng, X.; Sheng, F.; Hou, Y. Amelioration of systemic antitumor immune responses in cocktail therapy by immunomodulatory nanozymes. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabn3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Yao, W.; Liu, W.; Su, F.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Sun, M.; Ma, Y.; Xu, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, Y.; et al. Hybrid Membrane-Camouflaged Biomimetic Immunomodulatory Nanoturrets with Sequential Multidrug Release for Potentiating T Cell-Mediated Anticancer Immunity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 18592–18605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Lei, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Cao, J.; Huang, J.; Chen, J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; et al. Leveraging CRISPR gene editing technology to optimize the efficacy, safety and accessibility of CAR T-cell therapy. Leukemia 2024, 38, 2517–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Huang, G.; He, Y.; Chen, X.; Yin, T.; Ma, A.; Zhu, L.; Chen, L.; Liang, R.; Zhang, P.; Pan, H.; et al. Bioorthogonal oncolytic-virus nanovesicles combined bio-immunotherapy with CAR-T cells for solid tumors. Biomater. Sci. 2025, 13, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Marine polysaccharides and their biological activities (created with BioGDP).
Figure 1. Marine polysaccharides and their biological activities (created with BioGDP).
Marinedrugs 23 00384 g001
Figure 2. The structures of representative polysaccharides. (a) Structure of alginate. (b) Structure of chitosan. (c) Structure of κ-carrageenan. (d) Structure of ι-carrageenan. (e) Structure of λ-carrageenan. (f) Structure of Fucoidan with (1→3) Linkage. (g) Structure of Fucoidan with (1→3) and (1→4) Linkages. (h) Structure of laminarin.
Figure 2. The structures of representative polysaccharides. (a) Structure of alginate. (b) Structure of chitosan. (c) Structure of κ-carrageenan. (d) Structure of ι-carrageenan. (e) Structure of λ-carrageenan. (f) Structure of Fucoidan with (1→3) Linkage. (g) Structure of Fucoidan with (1→3) and (1→4) Linkages. (h) Structure of laminarin.
Marinedrugs 23 00384 g002
Figure 3. Potential advantages of marine polysaccharides for tumor immunotherapy (created with Figdraw, ID: UTUSPebbd3).
Figure 3. Potential advantages of marine polysaccharides for tumor immunotherapy (created with Figdraw, ID: UTUSPebbd3).
Marinedrugs 23 00384 g003
Figure 4. Application of marine polysaccharide drug delivery system in tumor immunotherapy (created with Figdraw, ID: RWYURb4b4b).
Figure 4. Application of marine polysaccharide drug delivery system in tumor immunotherapy (created with Figdraw, ID: RWYURb4b4b).
Marinedrugs 23 00384 g004
Table 1. Marine Polysaccharide-Based Nanocarriers for Anticancer Applications.
Table 1. Marine Polysaccharide-Based Nanocarriers for Anticancer Applications.
PolysaccharidePolysaccharide SourceType of Nanoparticle Delivery SystemRelevant Experimental Studies References
Alginate Brown algae (e.g., Macrocystis, Laminaria, Ecklonia, and Sargassum) and certain bacteria (Azotobacter and Pseudomonas)Magnetic bio-nanocomposite hydrogel beadsControlled Release: pH-sensitive release, drug release [85,86,87,88]
Alginate-based nanoparticles (NPs)Targeting: Effective targeting of ovarian cancer with minimal off-target effects[89,90]
Alginate Nanocomposite HydrogelsStimuli-Responsive: responsive drug release demonstrated by hydrogels[87,91,92]
ChitosanChitin, sourced from crustacean shells (e.g., shrimp, crab, lobster) and the cell walls of mushrooms, coral, algae, and nematodesSalicylic acid chitosan nanoparticleTherapeutic Effects: Salicylic acid-chitosan nanoparticles inhibit tumor growth and promote tissue regeneration[93,94,95,96]
Tripolyphosphate
cross-linked chitosan
nanoparticles
Cytotoxicity: Cytotoxicity was assessed against the cancer cell line[97,98]
CarrageenanPrimarily from aquaculture-based seaweed farming, with Eucheuma and Kappaphycus species accounting for >90% of global productionChitosan-Kappa-Carrageenan compositeControlled Release[99,100,101]
Kappa-carrageenan-coated magnetic
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/chitosan nanoparticles
Cytotoxicity and Targeting[102,103,104]
Kappa-carrageenan-coated nanoparticlesCarrageenan nanosystems exhibit targeted chemotherapeutic effects and cytotoxicity against breast cancer cell lines
(e.g., MCF-7)
[105,106,107]
Methacrylated carrageenan/gelatin hydrogel microspheres (MCGs)Immunomodulation: MCGs reshape
the TME to enhance response to
PD-L1 inhibitors
[108,109]
FucoidanBrown algae (Laminariaceae, Fucaceae, Chordariaceae, Alariaceae), sea cucumbers (Stichopodidae, Holothuriidae), sea urchin eggs (Strongylocentrotidae, Arbaciidae), and seagrasses (Cymodoceaceae)Fucoidan-based polymeric nanoparticles (NPs)Anticancer Activity: Assessed in HCT116 colorectal cancer cells[110,111]
Fucoidan-based nanoparticles (NPs)Improved Efficacy and Safety: Enhanced tumor regression, improved survival, and reduced off-target cardiotoxicity[112,113,114]
LaminarinBrown seaweeds such as Saccharina, Laminaria, and Fucus, with particularly high levels in Laminaria and
Fucus species
Laminarin–peptide dendrimer-based composite nanoparticlesInfluence on TAM polarization, cytokine secretion, and the proliferation and apoptosis of tumor cells[37,73,115]
Laminarin-coated pH-sensitive Genexol-PM nanomicellesTargeted delivery and pH-sensitive release of nanoparticles for selective tumor cell killing, reduced normal tissue injury, and alleviation of the immunosuppressive microenvironment to enhance antitumor immunity[116,117,118]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cha, M.; Yan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P. Progress in the Application of Marine Polysaccharide Drug Delivery Systems in Tumor Immunotherapy: Multiple Mechanisms and Material Forms. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23100384

AMA Style

Cha M, Yan S, Zhang Y, Wang P. Progress in the Application of Marine Polysaccharide Drug Delivery Systems in Tumor Immunotherapy: Multiple Mechanisms and Material Forms. Marine Drugs. 2025; 23(10):384. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23100384

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cha, Mingxue, Shuqiang Yan, Yiping Zhang, and Peipei Wang. 2025. "Progress in the Application of Marine Polysaccharide Drug Delivery Systems in Tumor Immunotherapy: Multiple Mechanisms and Material Forms" Marine Drugs 23, no. 10: 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23100384

APA Style

Cha, M., Yan, S., Zhang, Y., & Wang, P. (2025). Progress in the Application of Marine Polysaccharide Drug Delivery Systems in Tumor Immunotherapy: Multiple Mechanisms and Material Forms. Marine Drugs, 23(10), 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23100384

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop