Figure 1.
(A) Effects of the culture media BG11 and M-Zarrouk on biomass production of T. aequale, and (B) growth of T. aequale as affected by spiking the additional amount of phosphate (0.60 g L−1) or magnesium (0.13 g L−1) or both in the BG11. Experiments were conducted in glass columns (4.3 cm inner diameter) that each contained 900 mL culture medium. Culture temperature was 25 °C, and cool white fluorescence light was provided continuously at a light intensity of 200 μmol m−2 s−1. Culture pH was maintained at pH of 7.5–8.0 by providing compressed air bubbles containing 1~2% CO2. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 1.
(A) Effects of the culture media BG11 and M-Zarrouk on biomass production of T. aequale, and (B) growth of T. aequale as affected by spiking the additional amount of phosphate (0.60 g L−1) or magnesium (0.13 g L−1) or both in the BG11. Experiments were conducted in glass columns (4.3 cm inner diameter) that each contained 900 mL culture medium. Culture temperature was 25 °C, and cool white fluorescence light was provided continuously at a light intensity of 200 μmol m−2 s−1. Culture pH was maintained at pH of 7.5–8.0 by providing compressed air bubbles containing 1~2% CO2. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 2.
Morphological observations of T. aequale under bright field (left) and fluorescence microscopes (right). T. aequale was cultured in BG11 (A,B), BG11 + P (C,D), BG11 + Mg (E,F), BG11 + P + Mg (G,H), and M-zarrouk (I,J) and samples were taken on day 12 for microscopy. Cellular lipid bodies were stained with the fluorescent dye Nile Red. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure 2.
Morphological observations of T. aequale under bright field (left) and fluorescence microscopes (right). T. aequale was cultured in BG11 (A,B), BG11 + P (C,D), BG11 + Mg (E,F), BG11 + P + Mg (G,H), and M-zarrouk (I,J) and samples were taken on day 12 for microscopy. Cellular lipid bodies were stained with the fluorescent dye Nile Red. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure 3.
The cellular contents of TFA, EPA, and PLA, proportions of EPA and PLA in TFA, and productivities of TFA, EPA, and PLA of T. aequale grown in glass columns containing the different culture media: BG11, BG11 + P, BG11 + Mg, BG11 + P + Mg, and M-Zarrouk ((A): TFA; (B): EPA; (C): PLA). The values from the experiments (n = 3) are shown as mean ± one standard deviation. Different lowercase letters, capital letters, and Arabic numerals indicate significant differences among the EPA, PLA, or TFA contents, EPA, PLA, or TFA productivity, and EPA or PLA proportion in TFAs, respectively.
Figure 3.
The cellular contents of TFA, EPA, and PLA, proportions of EPA and PLA in TFA, and productivities of TFA, EPA, and PLA of T. aequale grown in glass columns containing the different culture media: BG11, BG11 + P, BG11 + Mg, BG11 + P + Mg, and M-Zarrouk ((A): TFA; (B): EPA; (C): PLA). The values from the experiments (n = 3) are shown as mean ± one standard deviation. Different lowercase letters, capital letters, and Arabic numerals indicate significant differences among the EPA, PLA, or TFA contents, EPA, PLA, or TFA productivity, and EPA or PLA proportion in TFAs, respectively.
Figure 4.
Solar intensity (A), ambient temperature (B), biomass concentration (C), and volumetric (filled column) and areal (blank column) biomass productivities of T. aequale (D) maintained in 0.56 m2 S-ORP outdoors at the culture depths of 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm. Different capital letters and lowercase letters indicate significant differences among volumetric and areal biomass productivities, respectively. The experiment was carried out from 18–27 July 2019.
Figure 4.
Solar intensity (A), ambient temperature (B), biomass concentration (C), and volumetric (filled column) and areal (blank column) biomass productivities of T. aequale (D) maintained in 0.56 m2 S-ORP outdoors at the culture depths of 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm. Different capital letters and lowercase letters indicate significant differences among volumetric and areal biomass productivities, respectively. The experiment was carried out from 18–27 July 2019.
Figure 5.
Solar intensity (A), ambient temperature (B), pH values and culture temperature (C,D), biomass concentration (E), and volumetric and areal biomass productivities (F) of T. aequale grown in 5.2 m2 M-ORP operated in a continuous mixing regime and a daytime mixing one. Each treatment had two biological replicates. The experiment was carried out from 31 July to 13 August 2019.
Figure 5.
Solar intensity (A), ambient temperature (B), pH values and culture temperature (C,D), biomass concentration (E), and volumetric and areal biomass productivities (F) of T. aequale grown in 5.2 m2 M-ORP operated in a continuous mixing regime and a daytime mixing one. Each treatment had two biological replicates. The experiment was carried out from 31 July to 13 August 2019.
Figure 6.
Solar intensity (A), ambient temperature (B), culture pH and temperature (C), and biomass concentration (D) of T. aequale grown in two outdoor 52 m2 L-ORP (L-ORP-1 and L-ORP-2) (filled square, hollow square, filled cycle, and hollow cycle represent pH values of L-ORP-1 and L-ORP-2, culture temperatures of L-ORP-1 and L-ORP-2, respectively). The experiment was carried out from 16–29 August 2019.
Figure 6.
Solar intensity (A), ambient temperature (B), culture pH and temperature (C), and biomass concentration (D) of T. aequale grown in two outdoor 52 m2 L-ORP (L-ORP-1 and L-ORP-2) (filled square, hollow square, filled cycle, and hollow cycle represent pH values of L-ORP-1 and L-ORP-2, culture temperatures of L-ORP-1 and L-ORP-2, respectively). The experiment was carried out from 16–29 August 2019.
Figure 7.
Protozoa and zooplankton occurred in T. aequale cultures outdoors, which were classified into three categories: flagellates and ciliates (A), amoeba (B), and rotifers and metazoans (C). (A1,A2): Poterioochromonas sp.; (A3,A4): flagellates (unknown); (A5): Vorticella convallaria; (A6): Epistylis sp.; (A7): Aspidisca sp.; (A8): Suctorian sp.; (A9): Colpoda sp.; (A10): Cyclidium sp. (scale bar: (A1–A4, A7, and A10) = 10 μm; (A5, A6, A8, and A9) = 20 μm). (B1–B4, B8, and B9): Vannella sp.; (B5 and B12): Nuclearia sp.; (B6 and B10): unknown amoeba; (B7 and B11): Heliozoa sp. (scale bar: (B1 and B3) = 5 μm; (B2, B5–B9, B11, and B12) = 10 μm; (B4 and B11) = 20 μm); (C1): Philodina sp.; (C2): Rotifer egg; (C3): Lecane inermis; (C4): Monostyla sp.; (C5): Lepadella patella; (C6): Chaetonotus sp. (scale bar = 20 μm).
Figure 7.
Protozoa and zooplankton occurred in T. aequale cultures outdoors, which were classified into three categories: flagellates and ciliates (A), amoeba (B), and rotifers and metazoans (C). (A1,A2): Poterioochromonas sp.; (A3,A4): flagellates (unknown); (A5): Vorticella convallaria; (A6): Epistylis sp.; (A7): Aspidisca sp.; (A8): Suctorian sp.; (A9): Colpoda sp.; (A10): Cyclidium sp. (scale bar: (A1–A4, A7, and A10) = 10 μm; (A5, A6, A8, and A9) = 20 μm). (B1–B4, B8, and B9): Vannella sp.; (B5 and B12): Nuclearia sp.; (B6 and B10): unknown amoeba; (B7 and B11): Heliozoa sp. (scale bar: (B1 and B3) = 5 μm; (B2, B5–B9, B11, and B12) = 10 μm; (B4 and B11) = 20 μm); (C1): Philodina sp.; (C2): Rotifer egg; (C3): Lecane inermis; (C4): Monostyla sp.; (C5): Lepadella patella; (C6): Chaetonotus sp. (scale bar = 20 μm).
Figure 8.
Photograph of ORP of the three sizes (A), and schematic diagram of three-size ORP (B). The illuminated surface areas of S-ORP, M-ORP, and L-ORP were 0.56, 5.2, and 52 m2, respectively.
Figure 8.
Photograph of ORP of the three sizes (A), and schematic diagram of three-size ORP (B). The illuminated surface areas of S-ORP, M-ORP, and L-ORP were 0.56, 5.2, and 52 m2, respectively.
Table 1.
Nutrient compositions of the culture media used in the study; ns means the chemical compositions of A5 solution are not shown.
Table 1.
Nutrient compositions of the culture media used in the study; ns means the chemical compositions of A5 solution are not shown.
Nutrients | Medium and Concentration (g L−1) |
---|
BG11 | M-Zarrouk | BG11 + P | BG11 + Mg | BG11 + P + Mg |
---|
CO(NH2)2 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 |
K2HPO4·3H2O | 0.0524 | 0.655 | 0.655 | 0.0524 | 0.655 |
Na2CO3 | 0.02 | - | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
MgSO4·7H2O | 0.075 | 0.2 | 0.075 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
CaCl2 | 0.0272 | 0.04 | 0.0272 | 0.0272 | 0.0272 |
Citric acid | 0.006 | - | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
Ammonium ferric citrate | 0.006 | - | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
Na2EDTA | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
FeSO4·7H2O | - | 0.01 | - | - | - |
A5 solution | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Table 2.
The final biomass concentration, the cellular EPA, PLA, and TFA contents, and productivities of biomass, EPA, PLA, and TFA in T. aequale cultures in 0.56 m2-ORP. The values from the experiments (n = 3) are shown as mean ± one standard deviation. The different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences.
Table 2.
The final biomass concentration, the cellular EPA, PLA, and TFA contents, and productivities of biomass, EPA, PLA, and TFA in T. aequale cultures in 0.56 m2-ORP. The values from the experiments (n = 3) are shown as mean ± one standard deviation. The different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences.
Medium | Final Biomass Concentration (g L−1) | Areal Biomass Productivity (g m−2 d−1) | EPA Content (%) | Areal EPA Productivity (g m−2 d−1) | PLA Content (%) | Areal PLA Productivity (g m−2 d−1) | TFA Content (%) | Areal TFA Productivity (g m−2 d−1) |
---|
1/2BG11 | 1.10 ± 0.03 | 15.5 ± 0.73 ab | 3.50 ± 0.01 | 542.5 ± 27.1 a | 3.68 ± 0.05 | 570.4 ± 34.6 a | 11.19 ± 0.11 | 1734.5 ± 98.7 a |
BG11 | 1.08 ± 0.01 | 15.3 ± 0.42 b | 3.25 ± 0.01 | 495.6 ± 15.2 b | 3.45 ± 0.02 | 526.1 ± 17.5 b | 10.66 ± 0.05 | 1625.7 ± 52.4 a |
BG11 + P + Mg | 1.15 ± 0.05 | 16.2 ± 1.26 a | 3.07 ± 0.03 | 496.4 ± 43.5 b | 3.27 ± 0.03 | 528.8 ± 46.1 b | 10.39 ± 0.09 | 1680.1 ± 145.5 a |
Table 3.
Fatty acid profiles (% TFA) of T. aequale cultured with the different media: 1/2 BG11, BG11, and BG11 + P + Mg. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of two replicates. In BG11 + P + Mg culture medium were the additional amounts of P and Mg, i.e., of 0.60 g L−1 K2HPO4 and 0.13 g L−1 MgSO4.
Table 3.
Fatty acid profiles (% TFA) of T. aequale cultured with the different media: 1/2 BG11, BG11, and BG11 + P + Mg. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of two replicates. In BG11 + P + Mg culture medium were the additional amounts of P and Mg, i.e., of 0.60 g L−1 K2HPO4 and 0.13 g L−1 MgSO4.
Fatty Acid Group | 1/2BG11 | BG11 | BG11 + P + Mg |
---|
C14:0 | 2.77 ± 0.02 | 2.66 ± 0.01 | 2.70 ± 0.01 |
C16:0 | 12.53 ± 0.01 | 13.36 ± 0.05 | 13.89 ± 0.12 |
C16:1 | 32.87 ± 0.08 | 32.26 ± 0.14 | 31.47 ± 0.04 |
C16:2 | 4.74 ± 0.08 | 4.96 ± 0.04 | 5.29 ± 0.02 |
C16:3 | 4.19 ± 0.02 | 4.71 ± 0.00 | 5.17 ± 0.01 |
C18:0 | 0.19 ± 0.00 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.04 |
C18:1 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.00 | 0.31 ± 0.00 |
C18:2 | 0.90 ± 0.03 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 1.14 ± 0.03 |
C18:3 | 1.24 ± 0.01 | 1.27 ± 0.00 | 1.32 ± 0.01 |
C20:3 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.02 |
C20:4 | 8.63 ± 0.07 | 8.47 ± 0.02 | 8.67 ± 0.06 |
C20:5 | 31.26 ± 0.36 | 30.50 ± 0.06 | 29.55 ± 0.06 |
∑SFA | 15.49 ± 0.03 | 16.20 ± 0.07 | 16.79 ± 0.17 |
∑MUFA | 33.25 ± 0.10 | 32.59 ± 0.14 | 31.78 ± 0.13 |
∑PUFA | 51.25 ± 0.68 | 51.11 ± 0.18 | 51.43 ± 0.21 |
Table 4.
EPA, PLA, and TFA contents, proportions of EPA and PLA in TFA, and areal productivities of EPA, PLA, and TFA as affected by culture depth ranging from 10 to 25 cm. The values from the experiments (n = 3) are shown as mean ± one standard deviation. The lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences.
Table 4.
EPA, PLA, and TFA contents, proportions of EPA and PLA in TFA, and areal productivities of EPA, PLA, and TFA as affected by culture depth ranging from 10 to 25 cm. The values from the experiments (n = 3) are shown as mean ± one standard deviation. The lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences.
Culture Depth | EPA Content (% DW) | EPA Proportion (% TFA) | PLA Content (% DW) | PLA Proportion (% TFA) | TFA Content (% DW) | APEPA (mg m−2·d−1) | APPLA (mg m−2·d−1) | APTFA (mg m−2·d−1) |
---|
10 cm | 3.05 ± 0.02 c | 26.34 ± 0.12 b | 4.09 ± 0.05 b | 35.38 ± 0.07 a | 11.56 ± 0.11 c | 266.89 ± 3.51 c | 357.88 ± 6.74 c | 1011.50 ± 16.30 c |
15 cm | 3.15 ± 0.03 b | 25.70 ± 0.37 b | 4.27 ± 0.01 a | 34.84 ± 0.09 b | 12.27 ± 0.08 b | 313.03 ± 7.95 b | 424.33 ± 8.75 b | 1219.33 ± 27.86 b |
20 cm | 3.39 ± 0.02 a | 27.00 ± 0.01 ab | 4.36 ± 0.01 a | 34.79 ± 0.05 b | 12.53 ± 0.04 a | 349.17 ± 10.00 a | 449.08 ± 12.05 a | 1290.59 ± 35.21 a |
25 cm | 3.42 ± 0.01 a | 27.51 ± 0.06 a | 4.27 ± 0.01 a | 34.47 ± 0.08 c | 12.40 ± 0.05 ab | 339.86 ± 7.45 b | 424.33 ± 9.20 b | 1232.25 ± 27.15 ab |
Table 5.
EPA, PLA, and TFA contents, proportions of EPA and PLA in TFA, and areal productivities of EPA, PLA, and TFA of T. aequale grown in 5.2 m2 M-ORP operated in a continuous mixing mode and a daytime mixing one. The values from the experiments (n = 2) are shown as mean.
Table 5.
EPA, PLA, and TFA contents, proportions of EPA and PLA in TFA, and areal productivities of EPA, PLA, and TFA of T. aequale grown in 5.2 m2 M-ORP operated in a continuous mixing mode and a daytime mixing one. The values from the experiments (n = 2) are shown as mean.
Mixing Regimes | EPA Content (% DW) | PLA Content (% DW) | TFA Content (% DW) | EPA Proportion (% TFA) | PLA Proportion (% TFA) | APEPA (mg m−2 d−1) | APPLA (mg m−2 d−1) | APTFA (mg m−2 d−1) |
---|
Continuous mixing | 3.23 | 4.50 | 11.89 | 27.13 | 37.92 | 370.84 | 518.52 | 1367.19 |
Daytime mixing | 3.02 | 3.81 | 10.65 | 28.57 | 35.76 | 289.01 | 361.69 | 1011.57 |
Table 6.
EPA, PLA, and TFA contents, proportions of EPA and PLA in TFA, and areal productivities of EPA, PLA, and TFA of T. aequale grown in two 52 m2 L-ORP outdoors operated in a continuous culture mixing mode.
Table 6.
EPA, PLA, and TFA contents, proportions of EPA and PLA in TFA, and areal productivities of EPA, PLA, and TFA of T. aequale grown in two 52 m2 L-ORP outdoors operated in a continuous culture mixing mode.
L-ORP | EPA Content (% DW) | PLA Content (% DW) | TFA Content (% DW) | EPA Proportion (% TFA) | PLA Proportion (% TFA) | APEPA (mg m−2 d−1) | APPLA (mg m−2 d−1) | APTFA (mg m−2 d−1) |
---|
L-ORP-1 | 3.20 | 3.96 | 11.69 | 27.38 | 33.85 | 343.42 | 424.60 | 1254.45 |
L-ORP-2 | 3.25 | 3.93 | 11.64 | 28.00 | 33.74 | 447.19 | 538.89 | 1597.06 |