Next Article in Journal
Chitin and Chitosan as Direct Compression Excipients in Pharmaceutical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Occurrence of Lipophilic Marine Toxins in Shellfish from Galicia (NW of Spain) and Synergies among Them
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanistic Insight into the Elastin Degradation Process by the Metalloprotease Myroilysin from the Deep-Sea Bacterium Myroides profundi D25
Previous Article in Special Issue
6-Bromohypaphorine from Marine Nudibranch Mollusk Hermissenda crassicornis is an Agonist of Human α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Article Menu

Export Article

Mar. Drugs 2015, 13(3), 1497-1518; doi:10.3390/md13031497

Review
Toxic Picoplanktonic Cyanobacteria—Review
Department of Water Protection, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Eric Blomme
Received: 1 December 2014 / Accepted: 9 March 2015 / Published: 18 March 2015

Abstract

: Cyanobacteria of a picoplanktonic cell size (0.2 to 2.0 µm) are common organisms of both freshwater and marine ecosystems. However, due to their small size and relatively short study history, picoplanktonic cyanobacteria, in contrast to the microplanktonic cyanobacteria, still remains a poorly studied fraction of plankton. So far, only little information on picocyanobacteria toxicity has been reported, while the number of reports concerning their presence in ecosystems is increasing. Thus, the issue of picocyanobacteria toxicity needs more researchers’ attention and interest. In this report, we present information on the current knowledge concerning the picocyanobacteria toxicity, as well as their harmfulness and problems they can cause.
Keywords:
picocyanobacteria; cyanotoxins; picoplankton; toxicity

1. Introduction

Picoplankton is the smallest size fraction of plankton. The size of organisms of picoplanktonic cell size ranges from 0.2 to 2.0 µm [1]. The group contains hetero- and autotrophic organisms. The latter group contains the following groups: Chlorophyta, Bacillariophyta, and Picobiliphytes [2,3,4], as well as prokaryotic Cyanobacteria [5,6,7,8].

Autotrophic picoplankton (APP) is a part of aquatic ecosystems that is still poorly studied. In the past, it has been confused with heterotrophic bacteria (HB). In 1968, Bailey-Watts et al. [9] for the first time confirmed the previous presumptions of Holmes and Anderson [10] concerning the existence of APP. Nevertheless, research on this group has developed very slowly, but the use of more sophisticated techniques, like epifluorescence microscopy [11], electron microscopy [2], flow cytometry [12] and other molecular biology methods have expanded current knowledge of APP.

It is already known that picocyanobacteria, like heterotrophic bacteria, constitute an important part of the microbiological loop [13,14]. They incorporate the dissolved organic matter (DOM) into the food web [15]. Thus, they comprise an extremely important element of aquatic ecosystem function [16,17,18]. Furthermore, they usually have relatively low biomass [19], high growth rate and a high amount of pressure from consumers [8,20,21]. Due to their small size picocyanobacteria comprise the main food source of the nanoplanktonic protozoans: Ciliata, Flagellata and larger zooplankton [22,23,24,25]. As reported by Stockner [3] and Sorokin et al. [26], picoplankton can constitute up to 98% of biomass and phytoplankton production. As picoplankton comprise such a high proportion of phytoplankton, they significantly influence not only the rate and the amount of the matter but also the energy that flows to higher trophic levels [15,27]. In the surface layers of water, the number of picocyanobacteria ranges from a few to even a few hundred thousand [28,29] and, at times, even to a few million cells in 1 mL of water [27,30,31,32]. The high number and metabolic activity of APP and HB clearly influences the ecological stability of water ecosystems [18,33]. Still, detailed studies on the picocyanobacteria physiology are lacking. Understanding this group is even more important considering that some species are members of the potentially toxic Cyanobacteria, which can create blooms and release cyanotoxins.

2. Cyanobacterial Blooms

From early spring to late summer, when the water temperature ranges from 15 to 30 °C, cyanobacteria may create blooms. The blooms (i.e., the massive occurrence of cyanobacteria) are accompanied by water turbidity and color changes [34,35]. The blooms result mainly in decreased biodiversity as a consequence of the dominance of one or, at most, a few species [35].

The first reports that are potentially consistent with mass blooms of cyanobacteria were recorded almost 2000 years ago, during the military campaigns of General Zhu Ge-Ling in southern China [36]. The next accounts dates to the 12th century from southwestern Scotland, in the vicinity of the former Monasterium Virdis Stagni (Monastery of the Green Loch), located near the Soulseat Loch, 2 miles from Stranraer [37]. Records of blooms that harmed people were not reported until 1793 in Canada [38] and 1842 in Great Britain [39]. Numerous incidences of death and illnesses of farm animals and dead fishes were reported in 1878 in Australia, and in Poland in 1884 [40]. Regularly increasing numbers of reports of cyanobacteria blooms and intoxications caused by cyanotoxins have motivated the creation of numerous documentations, statistics and analyses in order to better understand the phenomenon.

The most frequently observed blooms are connected with progressive eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems or other such disruptions [41]. The growth and development of cyanobacteria in inland and marine waters depends on their ability to gain food resources and exploit them with the lowest losses. That is why the increased availability of nutrients encourages blooms of cyanobacteria [35,42]. Moreover, numerous adaptations and habitat preferences are correlated with the size of cyanobacteria cells. Studies conducted since the 1980s show that cyanobacteria occur at a similar quantity in reservoirs with high as well as low trophic states [43,44,45].

3. Morphology and Physiology of Picocyanobacteria

In natural environments, picocyanobacteria exhibit dramatic seasonal fluctuations [8,19,46,47] in which the species composition as well as the number and form of their occurrence change [46,48,49,50]. Picocyanobacteria can occur as single cells or as microcolonies with thickly or loosely arranged cells [30,47,50,51,52]. In marine waters, single cells are most common and are represented by species of the genus Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. However, freshwater picocyanobacteria diversity is much greater. Previous studies of inland reservoirs have shown that picocyanobacteria density is highest in the summer. At that time, the proportion of picocyanobacteria occurring in the colony forms increases [50,53]; this pattern is found in oligo-, meso-, and eutrophic reservoirs [28,54]. Although there are hypotheses suggesting that aggregations occur as a result of genetics, survival mechanisms, pressure from consumers, or unfavorable external conditions, such as nutrient depletion, the exact nature of this phenomenon is still unknown [50,55].

The distribution of these organisms in the pelagic zone is also variable [56,57] and influenced by temperature (1–30 °C) and light tolerance [55,58]. Light that favors the development of picocyanobacteria falls into the range from 45 to 2000 μmol photon m−2 s−1 [59,60]. Light within this range permits picocyanobacteria to live in deeper water levels, with a lower light intensity found at the base of the euphotic layer. In this water zone green light does not exceed 1% of the radiation that reaches the surface of water [56,61,62].

Picocyanobacteria are photoautotrophs that, beside chlorophyll “a”, also contain accessory pigments, such as phycocyanin and phycoerythrin, while their predominant carotenoid is zeaxanthin [63,64]. The abovementioned phycobiliproteins, including allophycocyanin, absorb the green and blue–green, through yellow–orange to red light, which significantly exceeds the spectrum of absorbance of chlorophyll “a” [65]. Thus, the cells of picocyanobacteria have an increased ability to absorb the photons and use them in photosynthesis. Moreover, a decreased intensity of light does not change the assembly of carbon atoms into photosynthetic products. The ability to survive and regrow after periods of being in full darkness gives picocyanobacteria an advantage over larger algae.

Picocyanobacteria are also more able to assimilate biophilic compounds; this is possible because of the thin layer of “still” water around individual cells that results in a favorable (i.e., high) ratio of cell membrane area to cell volume [66]. The supplementation of nitrogen deficiencies from phycocyanin contained within their cells, as well as a higher rate of intake of nutrients, give these organisms a higher chance under nitrogen limitation [67,68]. This is also enabled by the wide spectrum of their occurrence in aquatic ecosystems. In contrast to some microplanktonic cyanobacteria considered as indicators of eutrophication, picocyanobacteria occur commonly in waters of all trophic types [43]. Picocyanobacteria are even found in oligotrophic ecosystems, where they are especially important to primary production.

4. Harmfulness and Toxicity

A combination of pigments, small size slowing down sedimentation and active usage of nutrients allows picocyanobacteria to grow intensively at great depths for many months. It must be emphasized that the phenomenon of creating an over-surface maximum concentration of chlorophyll can be a huge threat for the water intake located in an area of picoplankton development [56]. Furthermore, these organisms can secrete a number of secondary metabolites, however, many of these compounds may have useful properties, e.g., antibacterial, antiviral, anticoagulant or anticancer [69].

A major category of cyanobacterial secondary metabolites is oligopeptides, which includes a range of both proteinogenic and non-proteinogenic amino acids. Oligopeptides have highly variable structure and many of these compounds share common conserved substructures [69]. These structural similarities are used to classify oligopeptides into seven major peptide classes: aeruginosins [70], anabaenopeptins [71], cyanopeptolins [72], cyclamides [73], microcystins [74], microginins [75] and microviridins [76].

Many of these oligopeptides are synthesized through non-ribosomal pathways; although ribosomal synthesis, coupled with further posttranslational modifications has also been documented in the production of a few oligopeptide classes. Unlike ribosomal products, non-ribosomal oligopeptides are assembled by large multifunctional enzyme complexes, such as NRPS (non-ribosomal peptide synthetase) or NRPS/PKS (polyketide synthases) hybrid pathways. These pathways can produce particular structures that are not achievable by ribosomal peptide synthesis. NRPS and PKS genes often, and unexpectedly, occur within a single open reading frame [77].

Recently, cyanobacteria have been found to produce bioactive compounds through ribosomal pathways [78]. Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides are produced by a pathway referred to as post-ribosomal peptide synthesis [79]. These metabolites called cyanobactins, and they contain heterocyclized amino acids or isoprenoid amino acid derivatives [80]. Moreover, cyanobactins contain oxazolines, thiazolines or their oxidized derivatives, oxazoles, thiazoles and cyclic peptides, which consist solely of proteinogenic amino acids [81]. Currently, more than a hundred cyanobactins have been identified. The biosynthetic genes underlying cyanobactin production have been described in a many genera of cyanobacteria, including picoplanktonic Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus [82].

Picocyanobacteria, including few strains of Synechococcus as well as Synechocystis, and Aphanocapsa, synthesise 2-methylisoborneol (MIB) and geosmin (1,2,7,7-tetramethyl-2-norborneol) (GSM), secondary matabolites that are also taste and odor compounds produced as secondary metabolites [83,84,85]. MIB is produced and released throughout the life cycle of cyanobacteria, whilst geosmin is trapped in the cell bodies and released in high concentrations when individual cells die. These organic compounds can cause problems, especially in drinking water, because the human taste and odor detection thresholds for these compounds are between 5 and 10 ng L−1 [86]. However, reports note concentrations of picocyanobacteria reaching even 100 ng L−1, as observed in Lake Bowen [85].

A potential threat also results from the fact that picocyanobacteria are members of families in which toxic strains occur. Geosmin and MIB frequently co-occur with cyanotoxins in lakes and reservoirs, though most species of cyanobacteria are not capable of producing taste and odor compounds and cyanotoxins simultaneously [87]. It has to be expected, however, that they can also secrete toxic metabolites that are subject to bioaccumulation and biomagnification [88,89]. Due to that issue, they may have negative influences on other links of the food chain, and thus people [36,90,91].

Known toxins secreted by cyanobacteria can be divided into four basic groups, relating to their functionality: hepatotoxins, neurotoxins, cytotoxins and dermatotoxins [89,92,93]. These compounds are not considered to have significant roles in processes of metabolism and growth. It is claimed that secondary metabolites are produced as a chemical defense against predators of higher trophic levels or of cyanobacteria competition for resources with sympatric organisms [94,95,96]. Toxins can also play a role as signal substances or be a relict of evolution [38]. Chronic or sporadic contact with cyanotoxins can, however, cause pathological symptoms that may have either additive or synergistic effects.

As previously mentioned, cyanotoxins are compounds coded by clusters of genes that are responsible for their synthesis and transportation, as well as the synthesis of other enhancing enzymes. Biosynthesis of microcystins, a type of hepatotoxin, begins with transcription of the mcy cluster which spans 55 kb and is comprised of 10 genes arranged in two independently transcribed operons, mcyA-C and mcyD-J. NRPS, PKS and other enzymes are encoded by the larger operon, while the smaller mcyA-C encodes three NRPSs [97]. Other cyanotoxins are less well known yet are probably encoded in a similar manner. Biosynthesis of cylindrospermopsin (cytotoxin) is encoded by three predicted genes responsible for the following proteins: aoaA-aminotransferase, aoaB-NRPS, and aoaC-PKS. The gene encoding aoaB spans 5606 bp and is adjacent to aoaA, which is 1179 bp in length. The aoaC gene is transcribed in an opposite direction and spans 4299 bp [98]. Such neurotoxins are only now being studied, which makes it difficult to determine the function of consecutive genes. As reported by Mejean et al. [99], anatoxin is encoded in the ana cluster, comprising anaA-D and anaE-H, and probably synthesising PKS.

NRPS genes have been confirmed in 75% of 146 axenic cyanobacterial strains (including Cyanocystis PCC 9504) from 35 genera and five orders (Chroococcales, Pleurocapsales, Oscillatoriales, Nostocales and Stigonematales). However, those genes were not detected in Cyanothece, Synechococcus and Synechocystis strains [100]. Studies that attempt to detect of cyanotoxin biosynthesis genes in picocyanobacteria are lacking. However, physical-chemical studies based on the chromatographic analyses of water samples where picocyanobacteria were noted, compounds of such type were observed. It has also been shown that within one species of cyanobacteria, both toxic and non-toxic strains may occur [101,102,103,104]. It is also important to note that picoplanktonic cyanobacteria are a relatively difficult group of organisms for laboratory analyses. Many species cannot be maintained in cultures (so called VBNC–Viable but Nonculturable) similar to heterotrophic bacteria [105,106]. This makes gaining better knowledge of them and verifying the assumptions regarding their secretion of toxic metabolites difficult.

4.1. Hepatotoxins

Hepatotoxins are the group of cyanotoxins that occur most commonly. Microcystins and nodularins are classified into this group. Microcystins are cyclic heptapeptides, formed non-ribosomally in the cytoplasm with molecular weights from 900 to 1100 Da and a general formula of cyclo-(d-Ala1-X2-d-MeAsp3-Z4-Adda5-d-glutamate6-Mdha7) [107,108,109], while d-MeAsp3 is a d-erythro-β-methylaspartic acid. Adda is toxic and characteristic only for cyanobacteria acids containing 20 atoms of carbon (2S,3S,8S,9S)-3-amino-9-methoxy-2,6,8-trimethyl-10-phenyldeca-4,6-dienoic, and Mdha is N-methyldehydroalanine. X and Z indicate changing residues of l amino acids, such as leucine (L), arginine (R), alanine (A), tyrosine (Y), methionine (M), tryptophan (W), phenylalanine (F). These one-letter symbols of the residues of L amino acids are used in nomenclature of consecutive analogues of microcystins, about 90 of which are already known [77]. Every analogue is characterized by a different toxicity. The lethal dose for mice of the most commonly found and the most toxic Microcystin-LR (MC-LR) is 50 μg kg−1 while, for example, the MC-RR form has a lethal dose of 500–800 μg kg−1 [108].

The effect of microcystins is based on the specific transport of amphipathic organic compounds occurring in the hepatocytes’ cellular membranes. It consists of non-covalent bonds of serine/threonine phosphatases PP1 and PP2A in the hepatocytes’ cytosol. This causes inhibition of the phosphatases’ activity and, as a result, excessive phosphorylation of peptides (intermediate filaments and microfilaments), and also damage to the cytoskeleton of hepatocytes [110]. Damage to liver caused by microcystins can also occur as a result of an extended level of γ-glutamyl transferase [111,112].

Nodularins act analogically and similarly to microcystins LR are cyclo(-d-MeAsp1-l-Arg2-Adda3-d-Glu4-Mdhb5), where Mdhb stands for 2-(methylamino)-2(Z)-dehydrobutiric acid. Currently, 11 analogues of this toxin were found differing in regard to presence and absence of methyl groups in positions 1, 3 and 5 [89,113,114]. Dose LD50 (for mice) is 50 μg kg−1 [115].

In the initial phase of blooms, cyanotoxins occur inside the cyanobacteria cells. Decaying of the blooming, thus cell lysis, causes the release of toxic metabolites that leads to the increase of their concentration in the water. The presence of microcystins is noted in 50% to 90% of samples taken during blooming and their concentrations reach even 25 mg dm−3 of water and 20 mg in one gram of dry matter [108]. Nodularins, like microcystins, are highly soluble in water; they are not, however, as common. They were found most often in seawater, in which a marine species occurs, Nodularia spumigena Mertens ex Bornet and Flahault 1888 [89].

Hepatotoxins bioaccumulate and biomagnify in subsequent links of the food chain. They were found in tissues of planktonic crustaceans, snails, larvae of crabs, bivalves and fishes [36,90,116,117,118,119,120,121,122]. In cases of intoxications, internal bleeding and liver damage can occur. Characteristic symptoms of intoxications are gastrointestinal and liver disorders, weakness and anorexia. Hepatotoxins induce apoptosis and necrosis of hepatocytes and are also promoters of cancerous processes [123].

Hepatotoxin secretion by picoplanktonic species was first reported in 1999; these compounds were first isolated from six strains of picocyanobacteria collected in northern Brazil. Four of these strains were identified as colonial Aphanocapsa cumulus, Komárek and Cronberg 1999. The other two strains formed loosely dispersed cells. Picocyanobacteria were grown under controlled laboratory conditions, during which toxicity tests were performed. An insensitive HPLC analysis showed the presence of MC-LR in just one sample of single cells, whereas ELISA assays confirmed the presence of toxins in all cultures. Concentrations of microcystins there were very low (undetectable by HPLC) ranging from 0.08 to 3.7 ng mg−1 [124]. Water was collected from waste stabilization pond (WSP) in Cajati, São Paulo State, from which five species of picocyanobacteria were isolated, from the genus Merismopedia. ELISA assays detected a concentration of microcystins in these Merismopedia sp. CENA106 cultures of 2.17 μg L−1 [125]. Bláha and Maršálek [126] confirmed toxicity in the following cultures: Synechococcus nidulans (Pringsheim), Komárek in Bourrelly 1970 strain CCALA 188 (=UTEX 625); Cyanobium rubescens (T.P.Chang), Komárek, Kopeck and Cepák 1999 strain SAG 381 (isol. Chang 1979); and Cyanobacterium cedrorum (Sauvageau), Komárek, Kopecky and Cepák 1999 strain CCAP 1479/2a (SAG 88.79). HPLC analysis of the first two strains identicated that they poduce MC-LR; C. cedrorum was the most toxic. The HPLC analysis also detected other unidentified hepato- and cytotoxic compounds (i.e., compounds lacking standards). Later reports identified the secretion of MC-LR and MC-YR by marine Synechococcus isolated from the Salton Sea, California (strain SS-1) [127]. From 1999 to 2000, Synechococcus sp. SS-1, was one of the dominant organisms that formed harmful algal blooms. In 2009–2011 marine Synechococcus, as well as Aphanothece parallelliformis Cronberg 2004; Aphanocapsa delicatissima W. West and G.S. West 1912; Aphanocapsa incerta (Lemmermann) Cronberg and Komárek 1994; Cyanodictyon planctonicum Meyer 1994; Cyanodictyon imperfectum Cronberg and Weibull 1981; and Merismopedia tenuissima Lemmermann 1898, in 2009–2011 were noted in the Baltic Sea. The concentration of nodularin measured by HPLC and LC-MS/MS in environmental samples was noted then at a level of 0.1–2.2 μg L−1 [128]. However, studies confirming secretion of nodularin by the picoplanktonic species are missing.

4.2. Neurotoxins

Neurotoxins are a group of alkaloids containing anatoxin-a, with derivatives, anatoxin-a (s), and saxitoxin with analogues and non-proteinous amino acid β-Methylamino-l-alanine (BMAA) [38,129]. Concerning the chemical structure, anatoxin-a is an alkaloid with a molecular mass of 165 Da, LD50 ranging from 200 to 250 μg kg−1 and a general formula of 2-acetyl-9-azabicyclo[4.2.1]non-2-ene [130], while homoanatoxin-a is its analogue with a molecular mass of 179 Da, and it is a (2-(propan-1-oxo-1-yl)-9-azabicyclo[4.2.1]non-2-ene [131,132]. Anatoxin-a and its analogues are strong agonists of the nicotinic cholinergic receptor occurring in the postsynaptic membrane. Their action leads to an opening of the ionic channels and permanent depolarization of the neuromuscular synapse. Toxins bind with the acetylcholine receptor but can be hydrolysed by acetylcholinesterase, resulting in an over-stimulation of muscle cells [133,134,135]. Shortly after intoxication with anatoxins, the following symptoms occur: trembling and contraction of muscles, balance disturbance, abdominal troubles, and, in extreme cases, death from asphyxiation as a result of paralysis of the respiratory muscles [38].

Anatoxin-a (s), with a molecular mass of 252 Da and LD50 of 20 μg kg−1, is a unique phosphate ester of a cyclic N-hydroxyguanine, inhibiting acetylcholinesterase activity [36,136,137,138]. The mechanism of its activity is the quasi-irreversible inhibition of the enzyme acetylcholine-ACh, which causes neurological disorders similar to those caused by organophosphorous and carbamate insecticides (parathion and malathion) [38,138,139]. Except for salivation being the basic symptom of the activity of anatoxin-a (s), lack of ACh hydrolysis and opening of the ionic channels causes dysfunction of muscles by their exhaustion, which can lead even to death of the organism [139,140].

Saxitoxin, also called paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs), as well as its thirty other isomers, are heterocyclic guanidinium compounds, that inhibit the functional potential along the nervous appendage as a result of the blockage of the transport of Na+ ions through the sodium channels in nervous cells [141,142]. Except for the neurological activity causing motor disruptions, involuntary muscles palsy and paralysis, saxitoxins also show dermotoxic and cytotoxic effects, such as skin rash, eye irritation, abdominal pains and symptoms similar to influenza [38,143]. Intraperitoneal dose LD50 for mice is 5 μg kg−1, while the lethal dose for humans is 1 mg kg−1 [142].

BMAA with a molecular mass of 118.13 Da [144] causes disruption in the tertiary structure of proteins and their activity; it also disrupts function of the neuronal receptors and is an antagonist of glutamate [38,145,146,147]. The effect of its action is onset of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/Parkinsonism dementia complex (ALS/PDC) [147,148,149,150], manifesting as memory deficits, olfactory deficits, disorientation, personality changes, muscle weakness or atrophy, bradykinesia and gait disturbance [150,151]. The lethal dose LD50 for mice is 301 mg kg−1, while for larger mammals it is 1043 mg kg−1 [152]. As shown by studies of a terrestrial ecosystem of Guam (Pacific Ocean, Mariana Islands) [153], an inland aquatic ecosystem in Nebraska [144] and laboratory studies of Apis mellifera and other species [150], BMAA undergoes bioaccumulation and is a “slow toxin”. In the organism BMAA occurs mainly in a form bounded to proteins creating an inner reservoir of the compound, from which a slow release of the neurotoxins during the metabolism of proteins causes neuro-pathological interactions.

Previous reports confirm the synthesis of BMAA by two species of picocyanobacteria. Secretion of BMAA by the marine strain Prochlorococcus marinus CCMP1377, isolated from the Sargasso Sea was observed at a level of 32 μg g−1 Free BMAA and 57 μg g−1 Protein BMAA [148]. In the case of freshwater Synechococcus PCC 6301, the toxicity was lower (25 μg g−1 Free BMAA, with no detectable Protein BMAA) [148]. However, no other neurotoxins have been found to be synthesized by picocyanobacteria.

4.3. Cytotoxins

Cytotoxins are a group of toxins that includes many NRPS compounds (e.g., aeruginosin, acutiphicin, ambigol A and B, apratoxin A, curacin A, cyanobacterine, hectochlorin and dolastatin 10, nostocyclamide, patellamide A, raocyclamide A and B, scytoficine, tubercidine and wewakazole) [154,155] and two ribosomal peptides (microcyclamides and aerucyclamides) [156]. However, mitsoamide and cylindrospermopsin are the most common. Mitsoamide is a linear lipopeptide that was isolated from the marine cyanobacterium Geitlerinema sp. [157]. Cylindrospermopsin is a compound that contains tricyclic guanidine moiety combined with a hydroxymethyl uracil [158]. It is a “slow toxin”, with LD50 of 2.1 mg kg−1 (after 24 h) and LD50 of 0.2 mg kg−1 (after 5–6 days). Cylindrospermopsin has several paths of toxic activity: inhibition of glutathione, synthesis of proteins and cytochrome P450 [159], oxidative stress, leading to loss of chromosomes and splitting DNA [160,161], and disruptions of the cell cycle as a result of which apoptosis or necrosis of cells occur [162]. Cylindrospermopsin causes liver and kidneys damage as well as pathological changes of lungs, heart, stomach, adrenal glands and of the vascular and lymphatic systems [162,163]. Cytotoxins are secreted by cyanobacteria species from the orders Nostocales and Oscillatoriales.

At this time, the information on the possibility of secretion of cytotoxic metabolites by picoplanktonic cyanobacteria is lacking.

4.4. Dermotoxins

Dermotoxins are a group of liposacharids and indole alkaloids to which lyngbyatoxins, aplysiatoxin and debromo aplysiatoxins belong. Three isoforms of lyngbyatoxins can be distinguished: lyngbyatoxin-a, -b, and -c [164] with a molecular mass of 437 Da [165]. These are compounds with LD50 (for mice) of 250 μg kg−1 [166]. Due to their lipophilic properties, they cause skin irritations, such as skin itching, skin redness, skin burning, skin blistering and skin swelling [165]. Intake of lyngbyatoxins leads to the inflammations of oesophagus and alimentary canals [164]. Similar symptoms of activity are also observed following exposure to aplysiotoxins and debromo aplysiatoxins. These are, however, phenolic bislactones of 671 Da and 592 Da, with LD50 in mice of 100–120 μg kg−1 [167].

Lipopolisacharids (LPS) are the compounds of the external cell wall of gram-negative bacteria and cyanobacteria, including picoplanktonic Synechococcus and Synechocystis [107,168,169]. They have an external protective layer that protects them against unfavorable environmental factors, preventing lysis by complements, antimicrobial peptides and detergents [170]. Studies of heterotrophic bacteria have shown that LPS is comprised of four covalently linked segments: a surface carbohydrate polymer (O-specific chain); a core oligosaccharide, featuring an outer and inner region (core R); and an acylated glycolipid (lipid A) [171]. However, the LPS structure of Synechococcus is slightly different; They lack heptose and Kdo is replaced by 4-linked glucose-in the oligosaccharide core, and they contain a lipid A moiety uniquely characterized by odd-chain hydroxylated fatty acids and a lack of phosphates [170]. According to Takada and Kotani [172], this probably influences toxic activity of cyanobacterial LPS that is almost five times lower than LPS of E. coli [173]. LD50 of the cyanobacterial LPS (in mice) ranges from 40 to 190 mg kg−1 and depends on the cyanobacteria species [171].

Liposacharids have strongly allergic and irritating effects. They cause skin and eye irritation as well as other allergic reactions. After intake they can also cause symptoms typical for influenza: subfebrile body temperature, shivers, headaches, nausea, muscle and joints aches, drowsiness, mild amnesia and diarrhea [171]. According to Best et al. [174], LPS also causes decreased activity of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), which participate in detoxification of many xenobiotics. Decreased availability of GSTs can also be harmful to the ability of the organisms to detoxify microcystins.

4.5. Other Toxic Compounds

Physical-chemical studies conducted on Synechococcus sp. BP-1 have found that they have the ability to synthesize a unique sulfolipid with thioic O-acid ester (thionsulfolipid). The structure of this thionsulfolipid was identified as 6-sulfo-α-d-quinovopyranosyl- (1→1′)-2′-O-acyl-3′-O-thioacyl-d-glycerol. Furthermore it has been shown that the compound has toxic properties on HL 60 human lymphoma cells. After 24-h exposure of HL to thionsulfolipid, at a concentration of 200 μg mL−1, an inhibition of growth of 61% of cells was observed. Moreover, a test conducted on minnows found an LD50 of 20 mg kg−1 [175].

It is certain that a metabolic pathway for alkylthiocarbonyl exists because alkylthioic O-acid ester formation frequires alkylthiocarbonyl. This compound has not yet been found in any other photosynthetic organisms. It is assumed that alkylthioic O-acid ester is more efficient in photosynthesis than fatty acid esters or it may be a vestige of the incipient lipid metabolism [175].

5. Conclusions

Picocyanobacteria, despite their ubiquity, are a group of organisms still relatively poorly known. The basis of the monitoring studies that prove their presence in freshwater reservoirs is increasing, however, and knowledge of their toxicity is still scarce. The lack of complex studies of individual species, or even genera is striking. Few reports regarding the secretion of microcystins, neurotoxins or LPS by picocyanobacteria have been published (Table 1). The few published so far are mainly field studies, in which the explicit determination of the cyanotoxins’ sources is lacking. By far, behavioral characteristics of these organisms still comprise a limitation in monocultural studies as some of these species are VBNC. However, taking into consideration the development of new techniques and analytical possibilities, the chances of increasing knowledge of picocyanobacteria physiology are getting more likely.

It is necessary to take note of the role of these organisms in aquatic ecosystems, especially since they occur in all trophic types of water. Thus, their presence can be highly hazardous to people and other organisms using water intakes that are predominated by picocyanobacteria.

Table 1. Comparison of potentially toxic species of picocyanobacteria.
Table 1. Comparison of potentially toxic species of picocyanobacteria.
GenusSpecies/StrainToxinSource
SynechocystisSynechocystisLPS[86,108,127,168,169]
Microcystin
BMAA
Synechocystis aqualitisMicrocystin LR[124]
Synechocystis (SyncWTP97)Microcystin[176]
SynechococcusSynechococcus nidulans CCALA 188Microcystin[126]
SynechococcusLPS[86,108,127,128,168,169,177]
Microcystin
BMAA
Nodularin
Synechococcus PCC 6301BMAA[148]
Synechococcus SS-1Microcystin[127]
Synechococcus BP-1Thionsulfolipid[175]
Synechococcus CENA 108Microcystin[125]
CyanodictyonCyanodictyon planctonicumNodularin[128]
Cyanodictyon imperfectumNodularin[128]
CyanobiumCyanobium rubescens SAG 381Microcystin[126]
CyanobacteriumCyanobacterium cedrorum CCAP 1479/2aMicrocystin[126]
AphanocapsaAphanocapsa cumulusMicrocystin LR[124,178]
Aphanocapsa delicatissimaNodularin[128]
Aphanocapsa incertaNodularin[128]
Aphanocapsa sp.LPS Microcystin[86]
AphanotheceAphanothece stratusNodularin[178]
Aphanothece parallelliformis[128]
MerismopediaMerismopedia CENA106Microcystin[125]
Merismopedia tenuissimaNodularin[128]
RomeriaRomeria carauruMicrocystin[178]
ProchlorococcusProchlorococcus marinus CCMP1377BMAA[148]

Acknowledgments

NJ is a scholarship holder within the project “Scholarship support for Ph.D. students specializing in majors strategic for Wielkopolska’s development”, Sub-measure 8.2.2 Human Capital Operational Programme, co-financed by the European Union under the European Social Fund.

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

N.J. conceived and designed the study, collected the literature and analysed the data. N.J. wrote the manuscript. E.SZ-W. participated in the design of concept and substantive support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sieburth, J.M.N.; Smatacek, V.; Lenz, J. Pelagic ecosystem structure: Heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1978, 23, 1256–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Johnson, P.W.; Sieburth, J.M.N. In situ morphology and occurrence of eukariotic phototrophs of bacterial size in the picoplankton of estuarine and oceanic waters. J. Phycol. 1982, 8, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stockner, J.G. Phototrophic picoplankton: An overview from marine and freshwater ecosystems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1988, 33, 765–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Not, F.; Valentin, K.; Romari, K.; Lovejoy, C.; Massana, R.; Töbe, K.; Vaulot, D.; Medlin, L.K. Picobiliphytes: A marine picoplanktonic algal group with unknown affinities to other eukaryotes. Science 2007, 315, 253–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Johnson, P.W.; Sieburth, J.M.N. Chroococcoid cyanobacteria in the diverse phototrophic biomass. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1979, 24, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Waterbury, J.B.; Watson, S.W.; Guillard, R.R.L.; Brand, L.E.E. Widespread occurrence of a unicellular, marine, planktonic cyanobacterium. Nature 1979, 227, 293–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, W.K.W.; Subba Rao, D.V.; Harrison, W.G.; Smith, J.C.; Cullen, J.J.; Irwin, B.; Platt, T. Autotrophic picoplankton in the tropical ocean. Science 1983, 219, 292–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Callieri, C.; Stockner, J.G. Freshwater autotrophic picoplankton: A review. J. Limnol. 2002, 61, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bailey-Watts, A.E.; Bindloss, M.E.; Belcher, J.H. Freshwater primary production by a blue-green alga of bacterial size. Nature 1968, 220, 1344–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Holmes, R.W.; Anderson, G.C. Size fractionation of C14 labelled natural phytoplankton communities. In Symposium on Marine Microbiology; Oppenheimer, C.H., Ed.; Thomas Publisher: Springfield, IL, USA, 1963; pp. 241–250. [Google Scholar]
  11. Daley, R.J.; Hobbie, J.E. Direct counts of aquatic bacteria by a modified epifluorescence technique. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1975, 20, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Olson, R.J.; Vaulot, D.; Chisholm, S.W. Marine phytoplankton distributions measured using shipboard flow cytometry. Deep-Sea Res. 1985, 32, 1273–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Azam, F.; Fenchel, T.; Field, J.G.; Gray, J.S.; Meyer-Reil, L.A.; Thingstad, F. The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1983, 10, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Worden, A.Z.; Nolan, J.K.; Palenik, B. Assessing the dynamics and ecology of marine picophytoplankton: The importance of the eukaryotic component. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2004, 49, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pomeroy, L.R.; Williams, P.J.L.; Azam, F.; Hobbie, J.E. The microbal loop. Oceanography 2007, 2, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Weisse, T. The microbal food web and its sensitivy to eutrophication and contaminant enrichment: A cross-system overview. Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. 1991, 76, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Weisse, T. Dynamicsof autotrophic picoplankton in marine and freshwater ecosystems. In Advances in Microbial Ecology; Jones, J.G., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993; Volume 13, pp. 327–370. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chróst, R.J.; Siuda, W. Microbial production, utilization, and enzymatic degradation of organic matter in the upper trophogenic layer in the pelagial zone of lakes along a eutrophication gradient. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2006, 51, 749–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ribes, M.; Coma, R.; Gili, J.M. Seasonal variation of particulate organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon and the contribution of microbal communities to the live particulate organic carbon in a shallow near-botton ecosystem at the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. J. Plankton Res. 1999, 21, 1077–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Weisse, T. Dynamics of autotrophic picoplankton in Lake Constance. J. Plankton Res. 1988, 10, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Weisse, T. Freshwater ciliates as ecophysiological model organisms—lessons from Daphnia, major achievements, and future perspectives. Arch. Hydrobiol. 2006, 167, 371–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Callieri, C.; Karjalainen, S.M.; Passoni, S. Grazing by ciliates and heterotrophic nanoflagellates on picocyanobacteria in Lago Maggiore, Italy. J. Plankton Res. 2002, 24, 785–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Agasild, H.; Zingel, P.; Karus, K.; Kangro, K.; Salujöe, J.; Nöges, T. Does metazooplankton regulate the ciliate community in a shallow eutrophic lake? Freshw. Biol. 2013, 58, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fermani, P.; Diovisalvi, N.; Torremorell, A.; Lagomarsino, L.; Zagarese, H.E.; Unrein, F. The microbial food web structure of a hypertrophic warm-temperate shallow lake, as affected by contrasting zooplankton assemblages. Hydrobiologia 2013, 714, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jyothibabu, R.; Mohan, A.P.; Jagadeeesan, L.; Anjusha, A.; Muraleedharan, K.R.; Lallu, K.R.; Kiran, K.; Ullas, N. Ecology and trophic preference of picoplankton and nanoplankton in the Gulf of Mannar and the Palk Bay, southeast coast of India. J. Mar. Syst. 2013, 111–112, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sorokin, P.Y.; Sorokin, Y.I.; Boscolo, R.; Giovanardi, O. Bloom of picocyanobacteria in the Venice lagoon during summer–autumn 2001: Ecological sequences. Hydrobiologia 2004, 523, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Parvathi, A.; Zhong, X.; Pradeep Ram, A.S.; Jacquet, S. Dynamics of auto- and heterotrophic picoplankton and associated viruses in Lake Geneva. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2014, 18, 1073–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Szeląg-Wasielewska, E. Picoplankton and other size groups of phytoplankton in various shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia 1997, 342–343, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vörös, L.; Mózes, A.; Somogyi, B. A five-year study of autotrophic winter picoplankton in Lake Balaton, Hungary. Aquat. Ecol. 2009, 43, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Szeląg-Wasielewska, E. Autotrophic picoplankton dynamics in a small shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 1999, 408–409, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ning, X.; Cloern, J.E.; Cole, B.E. Spatial and temporal variability of picocyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. In San Francisco Bay. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2000, 45, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sorokin, Y.I.; Dallocchio, F. Dynamics of phosphorus in the Venice lagoon during a picocyanobacteria bloom. J. Plankton Res. 2008, 30, 1019–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sánchez-Baracaldo, P.; Handley, B.A.; Hayes, P.K. Picocyanobacterial community structure offreshwater lakes and the Baltic Sea revealed by phylogenetic analyses and clade-specificquantitative PCR. Microbiology 2008, 154, 3347–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Palmer, C.M. Algae in water supplies of Ohio. Ohio J. Sci. 1962, 62, 225–244. [Google Scholar]
  35. Paerl, H.W. A comparison of cyanobacterial bloom dynamics in freshwater, estuarine and marine environments. Phycologia 1996, 35, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chorus, I.; Bartram, J. Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water, A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring and Management; WHO, Spon Press: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  37. Codd, G.A. Harmful Algae News; IOC of UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  38. Błaszczyk, A.; Mazur-Marzec, H. BMAA and other cyanobacterial neurotoxins. PolHypRes 2006, 4, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  39. Francis, G. Poisonous Australian Lake. Nature 1978, 18, 11–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Codd, G.A.; Oberemm, A.; Tarczyńska, M. Recognition and awareness-raising of toxic cyanobacterial blooms and associated poisonings at Lake Barlewice, Poland in 1884, and recent cyanobacterial toxin analyses. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 2004, 4, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mur, L.R.; Skulberg, O.M.; Utkilen, H. Cyanobacteria in the environment. In Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water. A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences; Chorus, I., Bartam, J., Eds.; St Edmundsbury Press: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, UK, 1999; pp. 15–39. [Google Scholar]
  42. Paerl, H.W. Assessing and managing nutrient-enhanced eutrophication in estuarine and coastal waters: Interactive effects of human and climatic perturbations. Ecol. Eng. 2006, 26, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Callieri, C.; Stockner, J.G. Picocyanobacteria success in oligotrophic lakes: Fact or fiction? J. Limnol. 2000, 59, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bell, T.; Kalff, J. The contribution of picophytoplankton in marine and freshwater systems of different trophic status and depth. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2001, 46, 1243–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Callieri, C. Picophytoplankton in freshwater ecosystems: The importance of small-sized phototrophs. Freshwat. Rev. 2008, 1, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stockner, J.; Callieri, C.; Cronberg, G. Picoplankton and other non-bloom-forming cyanobacteria in lakes. In The Ecology of Cyanobacteria: Their Diversity in Time and Space; Whitton, B.A., Potts, M., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, Holland, 2000; pp. 195–231. [Google Scholar]
  47. Callieri, C.; Caravati, E.; Corno, G.; Bertoni, R. Picocyanobacterial community structure and space-time dynamics in the subalpine Lake Maggiore (N. Italy). J. Limnol. 2012, 71, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Crosbie, N.D.; Pöckl, M.; Weisse, T. Rapid establishment of clonal isolates of freshwater autotrophic picoplankton by single-cell and single-colony sorting. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2003, 55, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Horn, H.; Horn, W. Bottom-up or top-down—How is the autotrophic picoplankton mainly controlled? Results of long-term investigations from two drinking water reservoirs of different trophic state. Limnologica 2008, 38, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Callieri, C. Single cells and microcolonies of freshwater picocyanobacteria: A common ecology. J. Limnol. 2010, 69, 257–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stockner, J.G. Autotrophic picoplankton in freshwater ecosystems: The view from the summit. Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. 1991, 76, 493–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Komárková, J. Do cyanobacterial pikoplankton exist in eutrophic reservoirs? Verh. Internat. Limnol. 2002, 28, 497–500. [Google Scholar]
  53. Szeląg-Wasielewska, E. Dynamics of autotrophic picoplankton communities in the epilimnion of a eutrophic lake (Strzeszyńskie Lake, Poland). Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Lim. 2004, 40, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lavallée, B.F.; Pick, F.R. Picocyanobacteria abundance in relation to growth and loss rates in oligotrophic to mesotrophic lakes. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2002, 27, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stockner, J.G.; Shortreed, K.S. Autotrophic picoplankton: Community composition, abundance and distribution across a gradient of oligotrophic British Columbia and Yukon Territory lakes. Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. 1991, 76, 581–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gervais, F.; Padisák, J.; Koschel, R. Do light quality and low nutrient concentration favour picocyanobacteria below the thermocline of the oligotrophic Lake Stechlin? J. Plankton Res. 1997, 19, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Šilović, T.; Balagué, V.; Orlić, S.; Pedrós-Alió, C. Picoplankton seasonal variation and community structure in the northeast Adriatic coastal zone. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012, 82, 678–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Pick, F.R.; Agbeti, M. The seasonal dynamics and composition of photosynthetic picoplankton communities in temperate lakes in Ontario, Canada. Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol. 1991, 76, 565–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Morris, I.; Glover, H. Physiology of photosynthesis by marine coccoid cyanobacteria—Some ecological implications. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1981, 26, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kana, T.M.; Gilbert, P.M. Effect of irradiances up to 2000 μE m-2 s-1 on marine Synechococcus WH7803-II. Photosynthetic responses and mechanisms. Deep-Sea Res. 1987, 34, 497–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vörös, L.; Callieri, C.; Balogh, K.V.; Bertoni, R. Freshwater picocyanobacteria along a trophic gradient and light quality range. Hydrobiologia 1998, 369/370, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Joniak, T.; Jakubowska, N.; Szeląg-Wasielewska, E. Degradation of the recreational functions of urban lake: A preliminary evaluation of water turbidity and light availability (Strzeszyńskie Lake, Western Poland). Pol. J. Nat. Sci. 2013, 28, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  63. Vinebrooke, R.; Leavitt, P.R. Direct and interactive effects of allochthonous dissolved organic matter, inorganic nutrients, and ultraviolet radiation on an alpine littoral food web. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1998, 43, 1065–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Greisberger, S.; Dokulil, M.T.; Teubner, K. A comparison of phytoplankton size-fractions in Mondsee, an alpine lake in Austria: Distribution, pigment composition and primary production rates. Aquat. Ecol. 2007, 42, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kneip, C.; Parbel, A.; Foerstendorf, H.; Scheer, H.; Siebert, F.; Hildebrandt, P. Fourier transform near-infrared resonance Raman spectroscopic study of the α-subunit of phycoerythrocyanin and phycocyanin from the cyanobacterium Mastigocladus laminosus. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1998, 29, 939–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Fresneau, C.; Rivière, M.E.; Arrio, B. Characterization of the plasmalemma ATPase from the cyanobacteria Synechococcus PCC 6311 and PCC 7942. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1993, 306, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Allen, M.M.; Hutchison, F. Nitrogen limitation and recovery in the cyanobacterium Aphanocapsa 6308. Arch. Microbiol. 1980, 128, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wehr, J.D. Experimental tests of nutrient limitation in freshwater picoplankton. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 45, 1196–1201. [Google Scholar]
  69. Agha, R.; Quesada, A. Oligopeptides as biomarkers of cyanobacterial subpopulations. Toward an understanding of their biological role. Toxins 2014, 6, 1929–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ersmark, K.; del Valle, J.R.; Hanessian, S. Chemistry and biology of the aeruginosin family of serine protease inhibitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1202–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Harada, K.-I.; Fujii, K.; Shimada, T.; Suzuki, M.; Sano, H.; Adachi, K.; Carmichael, W.W. Two cyclic peptides, anabaenopeptins, a third group of bioactive compounds from the cyanobacterium Anabaena flos-aquae NRC525–17. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 1511–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Martin, C.; Oberer, L.; Ino, T.; König, W.A.; Busch, M.; Weckesser, J. Cyanopeptolins, new depsipeptides from the cyanobacterium Microcystis sp. PCC7806. J. Antibiot. 1993, 46, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Todorova, A.K.; Jüttner, F.; Linden, A.; Pluess, T.; von Philipsborn, W. Nostocyclamide: A new macrocyclic, thiazole-containing allelochemical from Nostoc sp. 31 (Cyanobacteria). J. Organ. Chem. 1995, 60, 7891–7895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Carmichael, W. Cyanobacteria secondary metabolites-The cyanotoxins. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1992, 72, 445–459. [Google Scholar]
  75. Okino, T.; Matsuda, H.; Murakami, M.; Yamaguchi, K. Microginin, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor from the blue-green alga Microcystis aeruginosa. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ishitsuka, M.O.; Kusumi, T.; Kakisawa, H.; Kaya, K.; Watanabe, M.M. Microviridin. A novel tricyclic depsipeptide from the toxic cyanobacterium Microcystis viridis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8180–8182. [Google Scholar]
  77. Welker, M.; von Döhren, H. Cyanobacterial peptides-Nature’s own combinatorial biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 530–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Schmidt, E.W.; Nelson, J.T.; Rasko, D.A.; Sudek, S.; Eisen, J.A.; Haygood, M.G.; Ravel, J. Patellamide A and C biosynthesis by a microcin-like pathway in Prochloron didemni, the cyanobacterial symbiont of Lissoclinum patella. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 7315–7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Arnison, P.G.; Bibb, M.J.; Bierbaum, G.; Bowers, A.A.; Bugni, T.S.; Bulaj, G.; Camarero, J.A.; Campopiano, D.J.; Challis, G.L.; Clardy, J.; et al. Ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptide natural products: Overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30, 108–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Schmidt, E.W.; Donia, M.S. Cyanobactin ribosomally synthesized peptides-a case of deep metagenome mining. Meth. Enzymol. 2009, 458, 575–596. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Leikoski, N.; Fewer, D.P.; Jokela, J.; Wahlsten, M.; Rouhiainen, L.; Sivonen, K. Highly diverse cyanobactins in strains of the genus Anabaena. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Shih, P.M.; Wu, D.; Latifi, A.; Axen, S.D.; Fewer, D.P.; Talla, E.; Calteau, A.; Cai, F.; de Marsac, N.T.; Rippka, R.; et al. Improving the coverage of the cyanobacterial phylum using diversity-driven genome sequencing. PNAS 2013, 110, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Journey, C.A.; Beaulieu, K.M.; Bradley, P.M. Environmental factors that influence cyanobacteria and geosmin occurrence in reservoirs. In Current Perspectives in Contaminant Hydrology and Water Resources Sustainability; Bradley, P.M., Ed.; InTech Online: Rijeka, Croatia, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Taylor, W.D.; Losee, R.F.; Torobin, M.; Izaguirre, G.; Sass, D.; Khiari, D.; Atasi, K. Early Warning and Management of Surface Water Taste-and-Odor Events; Awwa Research Fundation: Denver, CO, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  85. Journey, C.A.; Arrington, J.M.; Beaulieu, K.M.; Graham, J.L.; Bradley, P.M. Limnological Conditions and Occurrence of Taste-and-Odor Compounds in Lake William C. Bowen and Municipal Reservoir #1, Spartanburg County, South Carolina, 2006–2009; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2011.
  86. Graham, J.L.; Loftin, K.A.; Ziegler, A.C.; Meyer, M.T. Cyanobacteria in lakes and reservoirs: Toxin and taste-and-odor sampling guidelines (Version 1.0,9/2008). Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations; USGS, 2008; Chapter A7. Available online: http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/twri9A/ (accessed on 1 November 2014). [Google Scholar]
  87. Graham, J.L.; Loftin, K.A.; Meyer, M.T.; Ziegler, A.C. Cyanotoxin mixtures and taste-and-odor compounds in cyanobacterial blooms from the midwestern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7361–7368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kondo, F.; Ikai, Y.; Oka, H.; Ishikawa, N.; Watanabe, M.F.; Watanabe, M.; Harada, K.I.; Suzuki, M. Separation and identification of microcystins in cyanobacteria by frit-fast atom bombardment liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Toxicon 1992, 30, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Mazur-Marzec, H. Characterization of phycotoxins produced by cyanobacteria. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 2006, 35 (Suppl. 1), 85–109. [Google Scholar]
  90. Duy, T.N.; Lam, P.K.S.; Shaw, G.; Connell, D.W. Toxicology and risk assessment of freshwater cyano-bacterial (bluegreen algal) toxins in water. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 163, 113–186. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  91. Cox, P.A.; Banack, S.A.; Murch, S.J. Biomagnification of cyanobacterial neurotoxins and neurodegenerative disease among the Chamorro people of Guam. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13380–13383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Codd, G.A.; Metcalf, J.S.; Ward, C.J.; Beattie, K.A.; Bell, S.G. Analysis of cyanobacterial toxins by physicochemical and biochemical methods. J. AOAC Int. 2001, 84, 1626–1633. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Codd, G.A.; Morrison, L.F.; Metcalf, J.S. Cyanobacterial toxins: Risk management for health protection. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 203, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kaplan, A.; Harel, M.; Kaplan-Levy, R.N.; Hadas, O.; Sukenik, A.; Dittmann, E. The languages spoken in the water body (or the biological role of cyanobacterial toxins). Front. Microbiol. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Holland, A.; Kinnear, S. Interpreting the possible ecological role(s) of cyanotoxins: Compounds for competitive advantage and/or physiological aide? Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 2239–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Rzymski, P.; Poniedziałek, B.; Kokociński, M.; Jurczak, T.; Lipski, D.; Wiktorowicz, K. Interspecific allelopathy in cyanobacteria: Cylindrospermopsin and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii effect on the growth and metabolism of Microcystis aeruginosa. Harmful Algae 2014, 35, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pearson, L.A.; Neilan, B.A. The molecular genetics of cyanobacterial toxicity as a basis for monitoring water quality and public health risk. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2008, 19, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kellmann, R.; Mills, T.; Neilan, B.A. Functional modeling and phylogenetic distribution of putative cylindrospermopsin biosynthesis enzymes. J. Mol. Evol. 2006, 62, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Mejean, A.; Mann, S.; Vassilidis, G.; Lombard, B.; Loew, D.; Ploux, O. In vitro reconstitution of the first steps of anatoxin-a biosynthesis in Oscillatoria PCC 6506: From free L-proline to acyl carrier protein bound dehydroproline. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Christiansen, G.; Dittmann, E.; Ordorika, L.V.; Rippka, R.; Herdman, M.; Börner, T. Nonribosomal peptide synthetase genes occur in most cyanobacterial genera as evidenced by their distribution in axenic strains of the PCC. Arch. Microbiol. 2001, 178, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Neilan, B.A. The molecular evolution and DNA profiling of toxic cyanobacteria. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2002, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  102. Christiansen, G.; Molitor, C.; Philmus, B.; Kurmayer, R. Nontoxic strains of cyanobacteria are the result of major gene deletion events induced by a transposable element. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1695–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Neilan, B.A.; Pearson, L.A.; Moffitt, M.C.; Mihali, K.T.; Kaebernick, M.; Kellmann, R.; Pomati, F. The genetics and genomics of cyanobacterial toxicity. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 619, 417–452. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Mazur-Marzec, H.; Browarczyk-Matusiak, G.; Forycka, K.; Kobos, J.; Pliński, M. Morphological, genetic, chemical and ecophysiological characterisation of two Microcystis aeruginosa isolates from the Vistula Lagoon, southern Baltic. Oceanologia 2010, 52, 127–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Byrd, J.J.; Colwell, R.R. Maintenance of plasmids pBR322 and pUC8 in nonculturable Escherichia coli in the marine environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 2104–2107. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  106. Oliver, J.D. The viable but nonculturable state in bacteria. J. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  107. Rinehart, K.; Namikoshi, N.; Choi, B. Structure and biosynthesis of toxins from blue-green algae (cyanobacteria). J. App. Phycol. 1994, 6, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sivonen, K.; Jones, G. Toxic Cyanobacteria in Water: A Guide to Their Public Health Consequences, Monitoring and Management; E and FN Spon: New York, NY, USA, 1999; Volume 1, pp. 40–111. [Google Scholar]
  109. Rouhiainen, L.; Vakkilainen, T.; Siemer, B.L.; Buikema, W.; Haselkorn, R.; Sivonen, K. Genes coding for hepatotoxic heptapeptides (microcystins) in the cyanobacterium Anabaena strain 90. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2004, 70, 686–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fischer, W.J.; Altheimer, S.; Cattori, V.; Meier, P.J.; Dietrich, D.R.; Hagenbuch, B. Organic anion transporting polypeptides expressed in liver and brain mediate uptake of microcystin. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 203, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Pflugmacher, S.; Wiegand, C.; Oberemm, A.; Beattie, K.A.; Krause, E.; Codd, G.A.; Steinberg, C.E.W. Identification of an enzymatically formed glutathione conjugate of the cyanobacterial hepatotoxin microcystin-LR: The first step of detoxication. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1425, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Rao, P.V.L.; Gupta, N.; Bhaskar, A.S.B.; Jayaraj, R. Toxins and bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria and their implications on human health. J. Environ. Biol. 2002, 23, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Rinehart, K.L.; Harada, K.I.; Namikoshi, M.; Chen, C.; Harvis, C.A.; Munroe, M.H.G.; Blunt, J.W.; Mulligan, P.E.; Beasley, V.R.; Dahlem, A.M.; et al. Nodularin, microcystin and the configuration of Adda. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8557–8558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Namikoshi, M.; Choi, B.W.; Sakai, R.; Sun, F.; Rinehart, K.L.; Carmichael, W.W.; Evans, W.R.; Cruz, P.; Munro, M.H.G.; Blunt, J.W. New nodularins: a general method for structure assignment. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2349–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Pearson, L.; Mihali, T.; Moffitt, M.; Kellmann, R.; Neilan, B. On the chemistry, toxicology and genetics of the cyanobacterial toxins, microcystin, nodularin, saxitoxin and cylindrospermopsin. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1650–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Chen, D.Z.X.; Boland, M.P.; Smillie, M.A.; Klix, H.; Ptak, C.; Andersen, R.J.; Holmes, C.F.B. Identification of protein phosphatase inhibitors of the microcystin class in the marine environment. Toxicon 1993, 31, 1407–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Williams, D.E.; Craig, M.; Dawe, S.C.; Kent, M.C.; Holmes, C.F.B.; Anderson, R.J. Evidence for a covalently bound form of microcystin-LR in salmon larvae and dungeness crab larvae. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 463–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Mohamed, Z.A. Accumulation of cyanobacterial hepatotoxins by Daphnia in some Egyptian Irrigation Canals. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2001, 50, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Sipi, V.O.; Kankaanp, H.T.; Flinkman, J.; Lahti, K.; Meriluoto, J.A.O. Time-dependent accumulation of cyanobacterial hepatotoxins in flounders (Platichthys flesus) and mussels (Mytilus edulis) from the Northern Baltic Sea. Environ. Toxicol. 2001, 16, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Sipi, V.O.; Kankaanp, H.T.; Lahti, K.; Carmichael, W.W.; Meriluoto, J.A.O. Detection of nodularin in flounders and cod from the Baltic Sea. Environ. Toxicol. 2001, 16, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Adamovský, O.; Kopp, R.; Hilscherová, K.; Babica, P.; Palíková, M.; Pasková, V.; Navrátil, S.; Marsálek, B.; Bláha, L. Microcystin kinetics (bioaccumulation and elimination) and biochemical responses in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) exposed to toxic cyanobacterial blooms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26, 2687–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Amrani, A.; Nasri, H.; Azzouz, A.; Kadi, Y.; Bouaїcha, N. Variation in cyanobacterial hepatotoxin (microcystin) content of water samples and two species of fishes collected from a shallow lake in Algeria. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014, 66, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Falconer, I.R. Cyanobacterial Toxins of Drinking Water Supplies; CRC Press: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  124. Domingos, P.; Rubim, T.K.; Molica, R.J.R.; Azevedo, S.M.F.O.; Carmichael, W.W. First report of microcystin production by picoplanktonic cyanobacteria isolated from a Northeast Brazilian drinking water supply. Environ. Toxicol. 1999, 14, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Furtado, A.L.F.F.; Calijuri, M.C.; Lorenzi, A.S.; Honda, R.Y.; Genuário, D.R.; Fiore, M.F. Morphological and molecular characterization of cyanobacteria from a Brazilian facultative wastewater stabilization pond and evaluation of microcystin production. Hydrobiologia 2009, 627, 195–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bláha, L.; Maršálek, B. Microcystin production and toxicity of picocyanobacteria as a risk factor for drinking water treatment plants. Algol. Stud. 1999, 92, 95–108. [Google Scholar]
  127. Carmichael, W.W.; Li, R. Cyanobacteria toxins in the Salton Sea. Saline Syst. 2006, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Mazur-Marzec, H.; Sutryk, K.; Kobos, J.; Hebel, A.; Hohlfeld, N.; Błaszczyk, A.; Toruńska, A.; Kaczkowska, M.J.; Łysiak-Pastuszak, E.; Kraśniewski, W.; et al. Occurrence of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in the Southern Baltic Proper. Filamentous cyanobacteria vs. single-celled picocyanobacteria. Hydrobiologia 2013, 701, 235–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wiese, M.; D’Agostino, P.M.; Mihali, T.K.; Moffitt, M.C.; Neilan, B.A. Neurotoxic alkaloids: Saxitoxin and its analogs. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 2185–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Rogers, E.H.; Hunter, E.S., III; Moser, V.C.; Phillips, P.M.; Herkovits, J.; Muñoz, L.; Hall, L.L.; Chernoff, N. Potential developmental toxicity of anatoxin-a, a cyanobacterial toxin. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2005, 25, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Devlin, J.P.; Edwards, O.E.; Gorham, P.R.; Hunter, N.R.; Pike, R.K.; Stavric, B. Anatoxin-a, a toxic alkaloid from Anabaena flos-aquae NRC-44h. Can. J. Chem. 1977, 55, 1367–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Skulberg, O.M.; Carmichael, W.W.; Anderson, R.A.; Matsunaga, S.; Moore, R.E.; Skulberg, R. Investigations of a neurotoxic oscillatorialean strain (Cyanophyceae) and its toxin. Isolation and characterization of homoanatoxin-a. Env. Toxicol. Chem. 1992, 11, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Pravda, M.; Kreuzer, M.P.; Guilbault, G.G. Analysis of important freshwater and marine toxins. Anal. Lett. 2002, 25, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Rellán, S.; Osswald, J.; Saker, M.; Gago-Martinez, A.; Vasconcelos, V. First detection of anatoxin-a in human and animal dietary supplements containing cyanobacteria. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009, 47, 2189–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Wonnacott, S.; Gallagher, T. The chemistry and pharmacology of anatoxin-a and related homotropanes with respect to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Mar. Drugs 2006, 4, 228–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Matsunaga, S.; Moore, R.E.; Niemczura, W.P. Anatoxin-a (s), a potent anticholinesterase from Anabaena flos-aquae. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8021–8023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hyde, E.G.; Carmichael, W.W. Anatoxin-a(s), a naturally occurring organophosphate, is an irreversible active site-directed inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (EC 3.1.1.7). J. Biochem. Toxicol. 1991, 6, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Villatte, F.; Schulze, H.; Schmid, R.D.; Bachmann, T.T. A disposable acetylcholinesterase-based electrode biosensor to detect anatoxin-a(s) in water. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Devic, E.; Li, D.; Dauta, A.; Henriksen, P.; Codd, G.A.; Marty, J.L.; Fournier, D. Detection of anatoxin-a(s) in environmental samples of cyanobacteria by using a biosensor with engineered acetylcholinesterases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 4102–4106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Patocka, J.; Gupta, R.C.; Kuca, K. Anatoxin-a(s): Natural organophosphorus anticholinesterase agent. Mil. Med. Sci. Lett. 2011, 80, 129–139. [Google Scholar]
  141. Moustafa, A.; Loram, J.E.; Hackett, J.D.; Anderson, D.M.; Plumley, F.G. Origin of saxitoxin biosynthetic genes in cyanobacteria. PLoS One 2009, 4, e5758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Al-Tebrineh, J.; Mihali, T.K.; Pomati, F.; Neilan, B.A. Detection of saxitoxin-producing cyanobacteria and Anabaena circinalis in environmental water blooms by quantitative PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 7836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Rapala, J.; Robertson, A.; Negri, A.P.; Berg, K.A.; Tuomi, P.; Lyra, C.; Erkomaa, K.; Lahti, K.; Hoppu, K.; Lepistö, L. First report of saxitoxin in Finnish lakes and possible associated effects on human health. Environ. Toxicol. 2005, 20, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Al-Sammak, M.A.; Hoagland, K.D.; Cassada, D.; Snow, D.D. Co-occurrence of the cyanotoxins BMAA, DABA and anatoxin-a in Nebraska reservoirs, fish, and aquatic plants. Toxins 2014, 6, 488–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Chiu, A.S.; Gehringer, M.M.; Welch, J.H.; Neilan, B.A. Does α-amino-β-methylaminopropionic acid (BMAA) play a role in neurodegeneration? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 3728–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Chiu, A.S.; Gehringer, M.M.; Braidy, N.; Guillemin, G.J.; Welch, J.H.; Neilan, B.A. Excitotoxic potential of the cyanotoxin beta-methyl-amino-l-alanine (BMAA) in primary human neurons. Toxicon 2012, 60, 1159–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Chiu, A.S.; Gehringer, M.M.; Braidy, N.; Guillemin, G.J.; Welch, J.H.; Neilan, B.A. Gliotoxicity of the cyanotoxin, b-methyl-amino-l-alanine (BMAA). Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1482. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  148. Cox, P.A.; Banack, S.A.; Murch, S.J.; Rasmussen, U.; Tien, G.; Bidigare, R.R.; Metcalfj, S.; Morrison, L.F.; Codd, G.A.; Bergman, B. Diverse taxa of cyanobacteria produce β-N-methylamino-l-alanine, a neurotoxic amino acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 5074–5078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Berntzon, L.; Erasmie, S.; Celepli, N.; Eriksson, J.; Rasmussen, U.; Bergman, B. BMAA inhibits nitrogen fixation in the cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. PCC 7120. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 3091–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Okle, O.; Rath, L.; Galiziac, G.; Dietrich, D.R. The cyanobacterial neurotoxin beta-N-methylamino-l-alanine (BMAA) induces neuronal and behavioral changes in honeybees. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013, 270, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Combes, A.; Abdellaoui, S.E.; Sarazin, C.; Vial, J.; Mejean, A.; Ploux, O.; Pichon, V.; BMAALS group. Validation of the analytical procedure for the determination of the neurotoxin β-N-methylamino-l-alanine in complex environmental samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 771, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). Chemical Information Review Document for L-β-Methylaminoalanine (CAS No. 15920-93-1); U.S Department of Health Sciences National Institutes of Health: Research Triangle Park, CR, USA, 2008; pp. 1–40.
  153. Bell, A. The discovery of BMAA, and examples of biomagnifi cation and protein incorporation involving other non-protein amino acids. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Suppl. 2009, 2, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Burja, A.M.; Banaigs, B.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Burgess, J.G.; Wright, P.C. Marine cyanobacteria-prolific source of natural products. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9347–9377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Okino, T. Heterocycles from Cyanobacteria. Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 2006, 5, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  156. Ishida, K.; Murakami, M. Kasumigamide, an antialgal peptide from the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5898–5900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Andrianasolo, E.H.; Goeger, D.; Gerwick, W.H. Mitsoamide: A cytotoxic linear lipopeptide from the Madagascar marine cyanobacterium Geitlerinema sp. Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 79, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Falconer, I.R.; Humpagem, A.R. Cyanobacterial (Blue-Green Algal) Toxins in Water Supplies: Cylindrospermopsins. Environ. Toxicol. 2006, 21, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Froscio, S.M.; Humpage, A.R.; Burcham, P.C.; Falconer, I.R. Cylindrospermopsin-induced protein synthesis inhibition and its dissociation from acute toxicity in mouse hepatocytes. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 2003, 18, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wiseman, H.; Halliwell, B. Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: Role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer. Biochem. J. 1996, 313, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  161. Ríos, V.; Prieto, A.I.; Cameán, A.M.; González-Vila, F.J.; de la Rosa, J.M.; Vasconcelos, V.; González-Pérez, J.A. Detection of cylindrospermopsin toxin markers in cyanobacterial algal blooms using analytical pyrolysis (Py-GC/MS) and thermally-assisted hydrolysis and methylation (tch-GC/MS). Chemosphere 2014, 108, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Poniedziałek, B.; Rzymski, P.; Wiktorowicz, K. Toxicity of cylindrospermopsin in human lymphocytes: Proliferation, viability and cell cycle studies. Toxicol. Vitro 2014, 28, 968–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Hawkins, P.R.; Runnegar, M.T.C.; Jackson, A.R.B.; Falconer, I.R. Severe hepatotoxicity caused by the tropical cyanobacterium (blue-green alga) Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Woloszynska) Seenaya and Subba Raju isolated from a domestic water supply reservoir. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 50, 1292–1295. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  164. Osborne, N.J.T.; Webb, P.; Shaw, G.R. The toxins of Lyngbya majuscula and their human and ecological health effects. Environ. Int. 2001, 27, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Rzymski, P.; Poniedziałek, B. Dermatotoxins synthesized by blue-green algae (Cyanobacteria). Post. Dermatol. Alergol. 2012, 29, 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  166. Ito, E.; Satake, M.; Yasumoto, T. Pathological effects of lyngbyatoxin A upon mice. Toxicon 2002, 40, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Rzymski, P. Effect of cyanophyceae toxins on human health. Now. Lek. 2009, 78, 353–359. [Google Scholar]
  168. Schmidt, W.; Drews, G.; Weckesser, J.; Mayer, H. Lipopolysaccharides in four strains of the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechocystis. Arch. Microbiol. 1980, 127, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Schmidt, W.; Drews, G.; Weckesser, J.; Fromme, I.; Borowiak, D. Characterization of the lipopolysaccharides from eight strains of the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus. Arch. Microbiol. 1980, 127, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Snyder, D.S.; Brahamsha, B.; Azadi, P.; Palenik, B. Structure of compositionally simple lipopolysaccharide from marine Synechococcus. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 5499–5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Stewart, I.; Schluter, P.J.; Shaw, G.R. Cyanobacterial lipopolysaccharides and human health—A review. Environ. Health 2006, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Takada, H.; Kotani, S. Structure-function relationships of lipid A. In Bacterial Endotoxic Lipopolysaccharides; Morrison, D.C., Ryan, J.L., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1992; Volume 1, pp. 107–134. [Google Scholar]
  173. Rapala, J.; Erkomaa, K.; Kukkonen, J.; Sivonen, K.; Lahti, K. Detection of microcystins with protein phosphatase inhibition assay, high-performance liquid chromatography-UV detection and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: Comparison of methods. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 466, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Best, J.H.; Pflugmacher, S.; Wiegand, C.; Eddy, F.B.; Metcalf, J.S.; Codd, G.A. Effects of enteric bacterial and cyanobacterial lipopolysaccharides, and of microcystin-LR, on glutathione S-transferase activities in zebra fish (Danio rerio). Aquat. Toxicol. 2002, 60, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Kaya, K.; Sano, T.; Watanabe, M.M.; Shiraishi, F.; Ito, H. Thioic O-acid ester in sulfolipid isolated from freshwater picoplankton cyanobacterium, Synechococcus sp. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1993, 1169, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Oudra, B.; Loudiki, M.; Vasconelos, V.; Sabour, B.; Sbiyyaa, B.; Oufdou, K.; Mezrioui, N. Detection and quantification of microcystins from cyanobacteria strains isolated from reservoirs and ponds in Morocco. Environ. Toxicol. 2001, 17, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Graham, J.L.; Jones, J.R. Microcystin distribution in physical size class separations of natural plankton communities. Lake Reserv. Manag. 2007, 23, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Komárek, J.; Azevedo, S.M.F.O.; Domingos, P.; Komárková, J.; Tichý, M. Background of the Caruaru tragedy; a case taxonomic study of toxic cyanobacteria. Algol. Stud. 2001, 103, 9–29. [Google Scholar]
Mar. Drugs EISSN 1660-3397 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top