Next Article in Journal
Quantification and Analysis of Lung Involvement by Artificial Intelligence in Patients with Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis Treated with Nintedanib
Previous Article in Journal
Kidney Transplantation in Case of Renal Graft with Multiple Arteries: Challenges and Long-Term Results of Microsurgical Anastomosis Between Lower Polar Renal Artery and Inferior Epigastric Artery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Molecular Diagnosis of Severe Combined Immunodeficiency

by
Evangelos Bakaros
1,
Styliani Sarrou
1,
Antonios Gkantaras
2,
Alexia Matziri
3,
Achilleas P. Galanopoulos
1,
Konstantina Charisi
2,
Athanasios Bangeas
2,
Anna Taparkou
2,
Eleni Papadimitriou
2,
Varvara A. Mouchtouri
3,
Fani Kalala
1,
Christos Hadjichristodoulou
3,
Matthaios Speletas
1,*,† and
Evangelia Farmaki
2,†
1
Department of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece
2
Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology Referral Centre, First Department of Pediatrics, Aristotle University, “Hippokration” General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Laboratory of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Medicina 2025, 61(9), 1644; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091644
Submission received: 11 July 2025 / Revised: 11 August 2025 / Accepted: 7 September 2025 / Published: 11 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Genetics and Molecular Medicine)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) represents a group of rare and potentially fatal monogenic disorders arising from pathogenic variants in a broad spectrum of genes. Diagnostic delays beyond the first few months of life have been associated with poor overall survival and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes. Therefore, the aim of our study was to apply an NGS assay enabling the rapid and reliable diagnosis of SCID. Materials and Methods: We developed a targeted NGS panel of 30 genes implicated in the pathogenesis of most SCID cases and we applied it to three Greek infants with suspected SCID. Results: Each patient displayed a distinct immunophenotype—TBNK, TBNK+ and TB+NK, respectively—and was found to harbor pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the analyzed SCID-related genes. In particular, patient 1 carried two heterozygous ADA variants (c.58G>A, p.Gly20Arg and c.956_960del, p.Glu319Glyfs); patient 2 harbored two discrete pathogenic variants in the DCLRE1C gene (a large deletion of exons 1–3 and the nonsense mutation c.241C>T, p.Arg81*), causing Artemis deficiency; and patient 3 carried a hemizygous IL2RG missense variant (c.437T>C, p.Leu146Pro), associated with X-linked SCID. All variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Conclusions: Our method successfully identified the underlying genetic defects in all patients, thereby establishing a molecular diagnosis of SCID. These findings highlight the potential of targeted NGS assays for achieving rapid and accurate molecular diagnosis of SCID, which is crucial for the timely treatment of life-threatening conditions in affected children.

1. Introduction

Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is one of the most fatal groups of inborn errors of immunity (IEI), characterized by a profound T cell lymphopenia, often accompanied by the absence of B and/or NK cells [1,2]. A considerable number of genes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of SCID. The most prevalent type of SCID worldwide, accounting for approximately half of cases, is X-linked SCID, caused by mutations in the IL2RG gene that codes for the common gamma chain protein of the IL-2 receptor. The next most common types of SCID are associated with genetic defects in the ADA, RAG1 and RAG2 genes. Last but not least, deficiencies in the DCLRE1C (Artemis) or more rarely in the CD3, ZAP70 and IL7RG genes are also causative of the disease [3].
Early diagnosis of SCID, ideally within the first 3.5 months of life, can be life-saving, as more than 50% of children with SCID may die before a definite diagnosis and therapeutic intervention [4,5,6]. Delayed SCID diagnosis is associated with a poor prognosis along with high morbidity and mortality rates [7,8]. Although ADA-SCID was the first inherited disorder successfully treated with gene therapy [9], the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative treatment for SCID to date, regardless of the underlying molecular defect. Thus, rapid diagnosis of SCID is of utmost importance in terms of disease treatment and outcome.
Advances in molecular diagnostics with the implication of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have allowed the analysis of a large number of candidate genes, thereby facilitating the identification of monogenic defects underlying IEI. As a result, the NGS assay has become a reliable and cost-effective tool for IEI diagnosis [10,11,12,13]. On the other hand, Sanger sequencing of multiple candidate genes as an initial diagnostic approach is rather laborious, time-consuming and expensive, and nowadays, its use has been primarily restricted to confirm NGS results and to investigate the inheritance pattern of the identified mutations in segregation analyses [14].
The purpose of our study was to develop an NGS platform covering the 30 most common genes related to SCID pathogenesis. We achieved an early molecular diagnosis in three infants with SCID clinical and immunological phenotype, suggesting that our NGS assay serves as a rapid and reliable method for SCID diagnosis, allowing for the timely and appropriate management of affected patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

Three patients of Greek origin (P1, P2 and P3) with suspected SCID were included in the study.
P1, a 37-day-old male with failure to thrive, exhibited severe leucopenia, neutropenia and lymphopenia. Immunophenotyping revealed complete absence of T and B cells, as well as a profound reduction in NK cells, consistent with a ΤΒΝΚ SCID. Additionally, the thymic shadow on chest X-ray was absent.
P2, a 3.5-month-old female, displayed a medical history of fever and lymphopenia at the 50th day of life, which was initially attributed to a viral infection. On the 57th day of life, the fever recurred, and further laboratory analysis demonstrated a cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of the central nervous system (CNS). After 14 days of intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir treatment, the patient was discharged from the hospital. However, one month later, fever and lymphopenia recurred and CMV DNA was detected again in both the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the urine. Immunophenotyping of peripheral white blood cells showed absence of T and B cells with normal NK cell counts, consistent with ΤΒΝΚ+ SCID.
P3, an 8.5-month-old male with failure to thrive from the 5th month of life, suffered from a persistent, progressively worsening infection of the lower respiratory tract due to human metapneumovirus (hMPV) for over 2 months. Laboratory tests revealed severe lymphopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia, decreased counts of NK and CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, a profound reduction in the number of naïve CD8+CD45RA+ cytotoxic T cells (2.9%) and naïve CD4+CD45RA+ T helper cells (0.3%), as well as a remarkable increase in γδ+ T cells (mainly memory Vδ1+). All the aforementioned findings indicate a ΤΒ+ΝΚ SCID phenotype.
Demographic, laboratory and clinical characteristics of all patients are summarized in Table 1. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical School of the University of Thessaly (304/11 August 2022) and parents of the patients provided signed inform consent for the genetic analysis.

2.2. Molecular Studies

Peripheral blood from each patient equal to 300–500 µL was collected in a BD Mi-crotainer® MAP K2 EDTA tube. Genomic DNA was isolated using NucleoSpin® Tissue kit (Macherey–Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) and subsequently, eluted DNA concentration was measured utilizing both the NanodropTM Spectrometer and the Qubit4TM Fluorometer with dsDNA HS Assay KitTM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Furthermore, we designed an NGS custom panel (CPHS-46379Z-983 QIASeq® Targeted DNA Pro Custom Panel, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) targeting the coding regions of 30 common genes related to severe combined immunodeficiencies (SCID) or combined immunodeficiencies (CID), as presented in detail in Table 2.
DNA libraries were constructed using the customized QIAseq® Targeted DNA Pro panel Kit, following the protocol proposed by the manufacturer in QIAseq® Targeted DNA Pro Handbook (December 2022, Qiagen). The input DNA amount for all samples was determined at 80 ng. In brief, during library preparation, DNA samples were submitted to enzymatic fragmentation, end-repair and A-tail addition, followed by ligation of the generated fragments with a barcoded-specific adapter, containing the UMIs and sample-specific indices. After a targeted enrichment and a universal PCR, libraries were quantified by qPCR and then equimolarly pooled, in order to achieve an equal representation of all the samples. The pooled libraries were subsequently diluted and finally loaded onto a micro flow cell on a MiSeq Instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to undergo paired-end (2 × 150) sequencing.
Sequencing raw data were aligned to the Homo sapiens (human) reference genome GRCh38 (hg38), a process followed by variant calling through smCounter2. For this purpose, QIAGEN GeneGlobe Data Analysis software (https://geneglobe.qiagen.com/, accessed on 6 December 2024) was utilized. Data relating to the pathogenicity of the identified variants were derived from international databases, such as Clinvar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/, accessed on 30 March 2025) and Franklin by Genoox (https://franklin.genoox.com, accessed on 30 March 2025), whereas information about minor allele frequencies (MAF) was retrieved from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/, accessed on 30 March 2025). In silico evaluation of variant pathogenicity was carried out using SIFT (https://sift.bii.a-star.edu.sg/, accessed on 30 March 2025) and PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/, accessed on 30 March 2025) prediction tools. Variant classification into pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variant of uncertain significance (VUS), likely benign or benign adhered to the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) [16]. Genetic variants were considered as possibly causative of a SCID phenotype when all prediction tools evaluated them as damaging or possibly damaging and/or there was robust literature evidence supporting their pathogenicity. Wild-type and mutated protein 3D structure prediction was performed using AlphaFold 3 software [17], whereas visualization of the detected variants was achieved with PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 3.1.5.1., Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA.
All variants classified or predicted as pathogenic or likely pathogenic were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. After amplification of the targeted genomic regions with appropriate primers by PCR conducted on a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA), PCR products were purified using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Crawley, UK). Purified PCR products were subsequently sequenced using an ABI Prism 310 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) and a BigDye Terminator DNA sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). The nucleotide sequences of the primers utilized for the detection of the identified variants along with the corresponding PCR conditions are summarized in Table 3.

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Analysis of Patient P1

Molecular analysis of patient P1 revealed two heterozygous variants in the ADA gene (c.58G>A, p.Gly20Arg and c.956_960del, p.Glu319Glyfs). The first one was a very rare heterozygous missense variant in exon 2, with a frequency lower than 0.01% in the non-Finnish European (NFE) population (gnomAD Exome). The second variant was a frameshift mutation, located in exon 10 and characterized by a deletion of five nucleotides, that is reported in the NFE population with a frequency of approximately 0.02% (gnomAD Exome).
Taking into account that NGS assays cannot determine the in cis or in trans state of the detected variants and the fact that parental DNA was not initially obtained to perform a segregation analysis, we evaluated serum ADA levels, which were typically very low (2 U/L), being consistent with ADA-SCID. Thus, we could imply that the identified variants were in trans. In the following weeks, targeted Sanger sequencing of exon 10 of the ADA gene in both parents demonstrated that the healthy father carried ADA:c.956_960del in heterozygous state, thus reinforcing our hypothesis that the index patient was compound heterozygous (Table 4).

3.1.1. Pathogenicity Evaluation of the ADA:c.58G>A Variant

The c.58G>A (p.Gly20Arg) variant is described as pathogenic/likely pathogenic in the ClinVar database (Variation ID: 68267). SIFT and Polyphen-2 predicted the variant as deleterious and probably damaging, respectively. This variant has been already described in homozygosity in two unrelated patients with ADA deficiency, one from a Canada [20] and one from Turkey [21]. A guanine to adenine transition at a possible methylation CpG dinucleotide site results in the substitution of glycine by arginine at amino acid 20 of the ADA enzyme (Figure 1). This missense mutation is detected in a highly conserved area of the ADA protein that is involved in Zn2+ binding at the catalytic site, thus impairing ADA enzyme activity [20].

3.1.2. Pathogenicity Evaluation of the ADA:c.956_960del Variant

The c.956_960del defect is classified as pathogenic in ClinVar database (Variation ID: 193544). This frameshift variant produces a premature stop codon at position 319, three codons downstream the mutation site. The result is the creation of an abnormal transcript that may be degraded or may lead to the production of a truncated ADA protein with potentially abnormal function (Figure 1). Loss-of-function variants in the ADA gene are known to be pathogenic [23,24]. This pathogenic variant has been previously observed in both homozygous and compound heterozygous patients with ADA-related SCID [23,24,25,26].

3.2. Genetic Variations in Patient P2

In patient P2, a female infant with persisting CMV infection of the CNS and a ΤΒΝΚ+ SCID phenotype, we detected the nonsense variant c.241C>T (p.Arg81*) in the DCLRE1C gene, causing Artemis deficiency. According to ClinVar database (Variation ID: 4665), DCLRE1C:c.241C>T variant meets the criteria to be classified as pathogenic for autosomal recessive SCID due to DCLRE1C deficiency. This very rare variant with a frequency of 0.0031% in the non-Finnish European population introduces a premature termination codon in the protein-coding mRNA, hence producing either a truncated (Figure 2) or no protein due to nonsense-mediated decay, which are commonly known mechanisms for disease. Functional studies reveal a damaging effect, including significantly reduced Artemis protein activity [27]. This Artemis-deficiency causing variant has been already reported in the literature in individuals affected with SCID [27,28,29].
Based on the results of our targeted NGS assay, patient P2 was initially identified as homozygous for the previously described variant in the DCLRE1C gene. This finding suggested apparent homozygosity, which is consistent with the presence of two identical copies of the same allele. However, genetic analysis of the patient’s parents demonstrated that patient P2 is, in fact, compound heterozygous. More specifically, the maternal allele was found to carry a large deletion encompassing exons 1–3, while the paternal allele harbored the c.241C>T (p.Arg81*) nonsense mutation (Table 4).

3.3. Genetic Variations in Patient P3

In patient P3, an 8.5-month-old male infant with persistent, progressively worsening infection of the lower respiratory tract and a ΤΒ+ΝΚ SCID phenotype, we identified the c.437T>C (p.Leu146Pro) variant in the IL2RG gene. Since IL2RG gene is located on the X chromosome, patient P3 was hemizygous for the variant (X-linked SCID). This missense variant causes the substitution of neutral and non-polar leucine at position 146 of the IL2RG protein by proline, which is also a neutral and non-polar amino acid (Figure 3). It is worth mentioning that the detected c.437T>C (p.Leu146Pro) variant represents a de novo mutation in the IL2RG gene, as no maternal inheritance was confirmed by segregation analysis (Table 4).
Bioinformatic tools predicted the defect as deleterious or probably damaging (SIFT and PolyPhen-2, respectively). Despite the currently available data suggesting that the variant is pathogenic, additional functional studies are necessary to definitively prove that. Hence, this variant has been classified by ClinVar database as likely pathogenic (Variation ID: 2138602). The damaging effects of the IL2RG:c.437T>C variant are probably associated with conformational and/or stability changes in the interleukin-2 receptor gamma chain, which serves as an integral component of multiple cytokine receptors with a pivotal role in the development and function of T and B lymphocytes. At least one publication provides evidence that the aforementioned variant has been already detected in individuals with SCID [30]. No data for this variant is available in population databases.

4. Discussion

Our NGS-based diagnostic approach targets 30 genes reported as causative of SCID or CID by the International Union of Immunological Societies [1]. Among these genes, 7 are linked with ΤΒ+SCID (IL2RG, JAK3, IL7R, PTPRC, CD3D, CD3E and CD247), 9 are involved in ΤΒSCID (RAG1, RAG2, DCLRE1C, PRKDC, NHEJ1, LIG4, ADA, AK2 and RAC2) and 14 (ZAP70, TAP1, TAP2, TAPBP, B2M, CIITA, RFXANK, RFX5, RFXAP, DOCK2, CD3G, MALT1, CARD11 and BCL10) are associated with combined immunodeficiency, generally less profound than SCID. The panel was thus designed to encompass both classical SCID and less severe CID forms, allowing for a comprehensive molecular diagnosis of patients with suspected cellular and humoral IEI.
A definite molecular diagnosis with a high coverage of targeted genomic regions was achieved for all three patients analyzed. Since the patients’ genotype is consistent with the severely affected clinical phenotype and the laboratory findings observed, their disease could be probably attributed to the genetic variants detected via our targeted NGS-based method. The presence of all variants was further confirmed through a Sanger sequencing validation procedure (Supplementary Figure S1). All these data certify the reliability and validity of our NGS-based protocol in diagnosing SCID.
Segregation analysis revealed the inheritance pattern for three out of four of the detected variants. In more detail, patient P1 inherited the c.956_960del (p.Glu319Glyfs) from his father, while the c.58G>A (p.Gly20Arg) variant may potentially represent a de novo mutation or a variant of maternal origin. In the case of patient P2, our NGS-based diagnostic approach initially suggested homozygosity for the detected variant. However, patient P2 was found to be actually compound heterozygous, presenting with two distinct pathogenic variants in the DCLRE1C gene: a maternally inherited allele harboring a large deletion of exons 1–3 and a paternally inherited allele carrying the c.241C>T (p.Arg81*) nonsense variant. This finding underlines the limitations of targeted NGS assays in detecting deletions spanning large genomic regions, while confirming biallelic DCLRE1C pathogenic variants in patient P2, which is consistent with an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern. Finally, patient P3 seems to be a carrier of a de novo mutation c.437T>C (p.Leu146Pro) in the IL2RG gene, as no maternal inheritance was observed. In addition, it is well known that approximately one-third of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) cases have a positive family history, implying that the rest of the two-thirds arise from de novo mutations in the IL2RG gene [19].
It is worth mentioning that according to the literature, P1 seems to be the third case of ADA deficiency and P2 the fourth case of Artemis deficiency reported in the Greek population. Finally, P3 likely represents the first documented case of X-linked SCID (IL2RG deficiency) in a Greek infant with maternal Greek origin [31]. This is the first report in Greece, contributing valuable data to the limited genetic SCID/CID registry in the region and supporting the need for a broader application of NGS-based methods in SCID/CID diagnostics. This approach could significantly improve SCID and CID diagnosis, offering a promising path to better outcomes for pediatric patients suffering from such life-threatening disorders.

5. Conclusions

The NGS-based diagnostic approach presented herein was capable of identifying four different genetic variants that are probably associated with three distinct monogenic disorders (Artemis, common gamma chain and ADA deficiency). While the rarity of the condition constrained sample availability, leading to a small cohort which included only three patients, our observations provide valuable preliminary insights and lay the groundwork for future validation in larger cohorts. According to these preliminary findings, our molecular approach may be used as a reliable diagnostic tool in patients with suspected SCID/CID. However, further segregation analyses for all variants and functional studies along with the selection of a larger number of SCID/CID-causative candidate genes that could be included in our targeted NGS panel are expected to significantly increase the diagnostic potential of our method.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/medicina61091644/s1, Figure S1: Sanger sequencing electropherograms confirming the presence of the variants ADA:c.58G>A, p.Gly20Arg and ADA:c.956_960del, p.Glu319Glyfs (A), DCLRE1C:c.241C>T, p.Arg81* (B) and IL2RG:c.437T>C, p.Leu146Pro (C) in patients P1, P2 and P3, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and E.F.; methodology, E.B., S.S., A.M. and A.P.G.; software, E.B. and A.P.G.; validation, S.S., V.A.M., F.K., C.H., M.S. and E.F.; formal analysis, E.B.; investigation, E.B., A.G., K.C., A.B., A.T., E.P. and E.F.; data curation, E.B., S.S., A.M. and A.P.G.; writing—original draft preparation, E.B. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, S.S., F.K., A.G., K.C., V.A.M., C.H. and E.F.; visualization, E.B. and A.P.G.; supervision, M.S. and E.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the standard budget provided by The Research Committee of the University of Thessaly to the Medical School Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was designed according to Helsinki II Declaration Ethics and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical School of the University of Thessaly (304/11 August 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants (accompanying relatives) for every infant included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data being analyzed in this manuscript are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank Evangelia S. Gramoustianou for her excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Poli, M.C.; Aksentijevich, I.; Bousfiha, A.A.; Cunningham-Rundles, C.; Hambleton, S.; Klein, C.; Morio, T.; Picard, C.; Puel, A.; Rezaei, N.; et al. Human inborn errors of immunity: 2024 update on the classification from the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee. J. Hum. Immun. 2025, 1, e20250003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barreiros, L.A.; Sousa, J.L.; Geier, C.; Leiss-Piller, A.; Kanegae, M.P.P.; França, T.T.; Boisson, B.; Lima, A.M.; Costa-Carvalho, B.T.; Aranda, C.S.; et al. SCID and Other Inborn Errors of Immunity with Low TRECs—The Brazilian Experience. J. Clin. Immunol. 2022, 42, 1171–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mikkers, H.; Pike-Overzet, K.; Staal, F.J.T. Induced pluripotent stem cells and severe combined immunodeficiency: Merely disease modeling or potentially a novel cure? Pediatr. Res. 2012, 71, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  4. Puck, J.M. Population-based newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: Steps toward implementation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 120, 760–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Brown, L.; Xu-Bayford, J.; Allwood, Z.; Slatter, M.; Cant, A.; Davies, E.G.; Veys, P.; Gennery, A.R.; Gaspar, H.B. Neonatal diagnosis of severe combined immunodeficiency leads to significantly improved survival outcome: The case for newborn screening. Blood 2011, 117, 3243–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Khalturina, E.O.; Degtyareva, N.D.; Bairashevskaia, A.V.; Mulenkova, A.V.; Degtyareva, A.V. Modern diagnostic capabilities of neonatal screening for primary immunodeficiencies in newborns. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2021, 64, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chan, A.; Scalchunes, C.; Boyle, M.; Puck, J.M. Early vs. delayed diagnosis of severe combined immunodeficiency: A family perspective survey. Clin. Immunol. 2011, 138, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gennery, A.R.; Slatter, M.A.; Grandin, L.; Taupin, P.; Cant, A.J.; Veys, P.; Amrolia, P.J.; Gaspar, H.B.; Davies, E.G.; Friedrich, W.; et al. Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells and long-term survival for primary immunodeficiencies in Europe: Entering a new century, do we do better? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 126, 602–610.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuo, C.Y.; Kohn, D.B. Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Primary Immune Deficiencies. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016, 16, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nijman, I.J.; van Montfrans, J.M.; Hoogstraat, M.; Boes, M.L.; van de Corput, L.; Renner, E.D.; van Zon, P.; van Lieshout, S.; Elferink, M.G.; van der Burg, M.; et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing: A novel diagnostic tool for primary immunodeficiencies. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 529–534.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stoddard, J.L.; Niemela, J.E.; Fleisher, T.A.; Rosenzweig, S.D. Targeted NGS: A Cost-Effective Approach to Molecular Diagnosis of PIDs. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moens, L.N.; Falk-Sörqvist, E.; Asplund, A.C.; Bernatowska, E.; Smith, C.I.E.; Nilsson, M. Diagnostics of Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases: A Sequencing Capture Approach. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Al-Mousa, H.; Abouelhoda, M.; Monies, D.M.; Al-Tassan, N.; Al-Ghonaium, A.; Al-Saud, B.; Al-Dhekri, H.; Arnaout, R.; Al-Muhsen, S.; Ades, N.; et al. Unbiased targeted next-generation sequencing molecular approach for primary immunodeficiency diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 1780–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Beck, T.F.; Mullikin, J.C. the NISC Comparative Sequencing Program. Systematic Evaluation of Sanger Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing Variants. Clin. Chem. 2016, 62, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. About OMIM—OMIM—(OMIM.ORG). Available online: https://omim.org/about (accessed on 11 July 2025).
  16. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abramson, J.; Adler, J.; Dunger, J.; Evans, R.; Green, T.; Pritzel, A.; Ronneberger, O.; Willmore, L.; Ballard, A.J.; Bambrick, J.; et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 2024, 630, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hogner, S.; Lundman, E.; Strand, J.; Ytre-Arne, M.E.; Tangeraas, T.; Stray-Pedersen, A. Newborn Genetic Screening—Still a Role for Sanger Sequencing in the Era of NGS. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Puck, J.M.; Pepper, A.E.; Henthorn, P.S.; Candotti, F.; Isakov, J.; Whitwam, T.; Conley, M.E.; Fischer, R.E.; Rosenblatt, H.M.; Small, T.N.; et al. Mutation Analysis of IL2RG in Human X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency. Blood 1997, 89, 1968–1977. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Yang, D.R.; Huie, M.L.; Hirschhorn, R. Homozygosity for a missense mutation (G20R) associated with neonatal onset adenosine deaminase-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency (ADA-SCID). Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1994, 70, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Firtina, S.; Ng, Y.Y.; Ng, O.H.; Kiykim, A.; Aydiner, E.; Nepesov, S.; Camcioglu, Y.; Sayar, E.H.; Reisli, I.; Torun, S.H.; et al. Mutational landscape of severe combined immunodeficiency patients from Turkey. Int. J. Immunogenet. 2020, 47, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rawat, R.S.; Kumar, S. Understanding the mode of inhibition and molecular interaction of taxifolin with human adenosine deaminase. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2023, 41, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Adams, S.P.; Wilson, M.; Harb, E.; Fairbanks, L.; Xu-Bayford, J.; Brown, L.; Kearney, L.; Madkaikar, M.; Gaspar, H.B. Spectrum of mutations in a cohort of UK patients with ADA deficient SCID: Segregation of genotypes with specific ethnicities. Clin. Immunol. 2015, 161, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Baffelli, R.; Notarangelo, L.D.; Imberti, L.; Hershfield, M.S.; Serana, F.; Santisteban, I.; Bolda, F.; Porta, F.; Lanfranchi, A. Diagnosis, Treatment and Long-Term Follow Up of Patients with ADA Deficiency: A Single-Center Experience. J. Clin. Immunol. 2015, 35, 624–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Geelen, J.; Pfundt, R.; Meijer, J.; Verheijen, F.W.; van Kuilenburg, A.B.; Warris, A.; Marcelis, C. Severe phenotype of severe combined immunodeficiency caused by adenosine deaminase deficiency in a patient with a homozygous mutation due to uniparental disomy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 222–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cagdas, D.; Cetinkaya, P.G.; Karaatmaca, B.; Esenboga, S.; Tan, C.; Yılmaz, T.; Gümüş, E.; Barış, S.; Kuşkonmaz, B.; Ozgur, T.T.; et al. ADA Deficiency: Evaluation of the Clinical and Laboratory Features and the Outcome. J. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 38, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Felgentreff, K.; Lee, Y.N.; Frugoni, F.; Du, L.; van der Burg, M.; Giliani, S.; Tezcan, I.; Reisli, I.; Mejstrikova, E.; de Villartay, J.-P.; et al. Functional analysis of naturally occurring DCLRE1C mutations and correlation with the clinical phenotype of ARTEMIS deficiency. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 140–150.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moshous, D.; Callebaut, I.; de Chasseval, R.; Corneo, B.; Cavazzana-Calvo, M.; Le Deist, F.; Tezcan, I.; Sanal, O.; Bertrand, Y.; Philippe, N.; et al. Artemis, a novel DNA double-strand break repair/V(D)J recombination protein, is mutated in human severe combined immune deficiency. Cell 2001, 105, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Moshous, D.; Callebaut, I.; De Chasseval, R.; Poinsignon, C.; Villey, I.; Fischer, A.; DE Villartay, J. The V(D)J Recombination/DNA Repair Factor Artemis Belongs to the Metallo-β-Lactamase Family and Constitutes a Critical Developmental Checkpoint of the Lymphoid System. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003, 987, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Niemela, J.E.; Puck, J.M.; Fischer, R.E.; Fleisher, T.A.; Hsu, A.P. Efficient detection of thirty-seven new IL2RG mutations in human X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. Clin. Immunol. 2000, 95 Pt 1, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Michos, A.; Tzanoudaki, M.; Villa, A.; Giliani, S.; Chrousos, G.; Kanariou, M. Severe combined immunodeficiency in Greek children over a 20-year period: Rarity of γc-chain deficiency (X-linked) type. J. Clin. Immunol. 2011, 31, 778–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Prediction of the ADA protein structure in patient P1, compared to its wild-type form. ADA enzyme key active sites (His-15, His-17, His-214 and Asp-295 [22]) are highlighted in yellow, wild-type amino acids are depicted in blue, and mutated amino acids in red and green (missense and frameshift mutations, respectively). The orange-colored regions indicate amino acids where changes occur. The missense variant c.58G>A leads to a glycine substitution by arginine at position 20 of the ADA protein, located near the key active sites His-15 and His-17. The second variant detected (c.956_960del) is an open reading frame mutation resulting in a truncated protein with 320 amino acids.
Figure 1. Prediction of the ADA protein structure in patient P1, compared to its wild-type form. ADA enzyme key active sites (His-15, His-17, His-214 and Asp-295 [22]) are highlighted in yellow, wild-type amino acids are depicted in blue, and mutated amino acids in red and green (missense and frameshift mutations, respectively). The orange-colored regions indicate amino acids where changes occur. The missense variant c.58G>A leads to a glycine substitution by arginine at position 20 of the ADA protein, located near the key active sites His-15 and His-17. The second variant detected (c.956_960del) is an open reading frame mutation resulting in a truncated protein with 320 amino acids.
Medicina 61 01644 g001
Figure 2. Prediction of the Artemis protein structure in patient P2, compared to its wild-type form. The nonsense variant c.241C>T converts codon CGA that codes for arginine to the stop codon UGA, thereby causing premature termination of the translation process and the production of a truncated protein.
Figure 2. Prediction of the Artemis protein structure in patient P2, compared to its wild-type form. The nonsense variant c.241C>T converts codon CGA that codes for arginine to the stop codon UGA, thereby causing premature termination of the translation process and the production of a truncated protein.
Medicina 61 01644 g002
Figure 3. Prediction of the common gamma chain (γc) structure in patient P3, compared to its wild-type form. The missense variant c.437T>C in the IL2RG gene causes the substitution of neutral and non-polar leucine (blue) at position 146 of the common gamma chain by neutral and non-polar proline (red).
Figure 3. Prediction of the common gamma chain (γc) structure in patient P3, compared to its wild-type form. The missense variant c.437T>C in the IL2RG gene causes the substitution of neutral and non-polar leucine (blue) at position 146 of the common gamma chain by neutral and non-polar proline (red).
Medicina 61 01644 g003
Table 1. Clinical and immunological features of patients subjected to molecular analysis.
Table 1. Clinical and immunological features of patients subjected to molecular analysis.
PatientSexAge on
Diagnosis
Clinical ManifestationsImmune
Phenotype
Outcome
P1M37 daysFailure to thrive, severe leucopenia, neutropenia and lymphopenia, absence of thymic shadowΤΒΝΚ SCIDAlive, under
enzyme replacement therapy and
chemoprotective
regimen until gene therapy
P2F3.5 monthsPersistent CMV infection of the CNS,
hypogammaglobulinemia, severe lymphopenia from 50th day of life,
normal levels of NK cells
ΤΒΝΚ+ SCIDDeath due to HSCT complications and CMV treatment
toxicities
P3M8.5 monthsPersistent respiratory
infection, leucopenia,
severe lymphopenia,
hypogammaglobulinemia, reduced CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T and NK cells
ΤΒ+ΝΚ SCIDDeath prior to HSCT due to respiratory failure
Abbreviations: M, male; F, female; ADA, adenosine deaminase; DCLRE1C, DNA cross-link repair 1C; IL2RG, interleukin 2 receptor subunit gamma; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CNS, central nervous system; SCID, severe combined immunodeficiency; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Table 2. List of the 30 SCID/CID-causative genes included in the NGS targeted panel of the study.
Table 2. List of the 30 SCID/CID-causative genes included in the NGS targeted panel of the study.
NoImplicated Gene/OMIMAssociated IEIClinical ManifestationsInheritance
1IL2RG/308380γc deficiencyCID moderate, SCID (TB+NK)XLR
2JAK3/600173JAK3 deficiencySCID (TB+NK)AR
3IL7R/146661IL7Rα deficiencyIMD 104, SCID (TB+NK+)AR
4PTPRC/151460CD45 deficiencyIMD 105, SCID (TB+NK+)AR
5CD3D/186790CD3δ deficiencyIMD19, SCID (TB+NK+)AR
6CD3E/186830CD3ε deficiencyIMD18, SCID (TB+NK+)AR
7CD247/186780CD3ζ deficiencyIMD25 (provisional, TB+NK+)AR
8RAG1/179615RAG deficiencyCombined cellular and humoral immune defects with granulomas, Omenn syndrome, SCID (TBNK+)AR
9RAG2/179616
10DCLRE1C/605988Artemis deficiencyOmmen syndrome, Athabascan-type SCID (TBNK+)AR
11PRKDC/600899DNA-PKcs deficiencyIMD26, with or without neurologic abnormalities, SCID (TBNK+)AR
12LIG4/601837DNA ligase IV deficiencyLIG4 syndrome, SCID (TBNK+)AR
13NHEJ1/611290Cernunnos/XLF deficiencyIMD124, SCID (TBNK+), Microphthalmia/coloboma 13AR
14AK2/103020AK2 defectReticular dysgenesis (TBNK)AR
15ADA/608958ADA deficiencySCID due to ADA deficiency (TBNK)AR
16RAC2/602049Activated RAC2
defect
IMD73A with defective neutrophil chemotaxis and leukocytosis, IMD73B with defective neutrophil chemotaxis and lymphopenia, SCID (TBNK)AD GoF
17ZAP70/176947ZAP-70 deficiencyAutoimmune disease, multisystem, infantile-onset, 2, IMD48AR
18RFX5/601863MHC class II deficiencyMHC class II deficiency 3, MHC class II deficiency 5 (provisional)AR
19RFXAP/601861MHC class II deficiency 4
20CIITA/600005MHC class II deficiency 1
21RFXANK/603200MHC class II deficiency 2
22TAP1/170260MHC class I deficiencyMHC class I deficiency 1AR
23TAP2/170261MHC class I deficiency 2
24TAPBP/601962MHC class I deficiency 3 (provisional)
25B2M/109700IMD43
26CD3G/186740CD3γ deficiencyIMD 17, CD3 gamma deficientAR
27DOCK2/603122DOCK2 deficiencyIMD40AR
28CARD11/607210CARD11 deficiencyIMD11AAR LoF
29BCL10/616098BCL10 deficiencyIMD37 (provisional)AR
30MALT1/604860MALT1 deficiencyIMD12AR
Abbreviations: OMIM, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man; IL2RG, interleukin 2 receptor subunit gamma; JAK3, Janus kinase 3; IL7R, interleukin-7 receptor; PTPRC, protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type C; CD3D, CD3 delta subunit of T-cell receptor complex; CD3E, CD3 epsilon subunit of T-cell receptor complex; CD247, T-cell surface glycoprotein CD3 zeta chain; RAG1, recombination activating gene 1; RAG2, recombination activating gene 2; DCLRE1C, DNA cross-link repair 1C; PRKDC, protein kinase, DNA-activated, catalytic subunit; LIG4, DNA ligase 4; NHEJ1, non-homologous end joining factor 1; AK2, adenylate kinase 2; ADA, adenosine deaminase; RAC2, rac family small GTPase 2; ZAP70, zeta chain of T cell receptor-associated protein kinase 70; RFX5, regulatory factor X5; RFXAP, regulatory factor X-associated protein; CIITA, class II major histocompatibility complex transactivator; RFXANK, regulatory factor X-associated ankyrin-containing protein; TAP1, transporter 1, ATP binding cassette subfamily B member; TAP2, transporter 2, ATP binding cassette subfamily B member; TAPBP, TAP binding protein; B2M, beta-2-microglobulin; CD3G, CD3 gamma subunit of T-cell receptor complex; DOCK2, dedicator of cytokinesis 2; CARD11, caspase recruitment domain family member 11; BCL10, B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 10 immune signaling adaptor; MALT1, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation 1, IEI, inborn error of immunity; IL7Rα, interleukin-7 receptor subunit alpha; DNA-PKcs, DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit; XLF deficiency, XRCC4-like factor deficiency; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; CID, combined immunodeficiency; SCID, severe combined immunodeficiency; XLR, X-linked recessive; AR, autosomal recessive; AD, autosomal dominant; IMD, immunodeficiency; GoF, gain-of-function; LoF, loss-of-function [1,15].
Table 3. PCR protocols used for the confirmation of the detected variants in ADA, DCLRE1C and IL2RG genes by Sanger sequencing.
Table 3. PCR protocols used for the confirmation of the detected variants in ADA, DCLRE1C and IL2RG genes by Sanger sequencing.
GeneTargeted RegionTranscriptPrimer SequencePCR Product (bp)PCR ConditionsReference
ADAExon 2NM_000022.4F: 5′-AACATTAAGCTCTGAAAGGTCCTTCG-3′
R: 5′-GCTTGATTCCCACAGGGAGAC-3′
27294 °C 5 min, 35 cycles (94 °C 30 s, 62 °C 45 s, 72 °C 45 s), 72 °C 10 min[18]
Exon 10F: 5′-GGCTGCCATTCTGCCTGGTT-3′
R: 5′-CCTCTCTCCAAAGATTCCAGGC-3′
49594 °C 5 min, 40 cycles (94 °C 30 s, 60 °C 45 s, 72 °C 45 s), 72 °C 10 min
DCLRE1CExon 3NM_001033855.3F: 5′-TCTAACAGATTTTGTGCCAGCG-3′
R: 5′-CTGAAGTATGTTACAAACTGAGGC-3′
41394 °C 5 min, 32 cycles (94 °C 30 s, 62 °C 1 min, 72 °C 45 s), 72 °C 3 minIn house design of primers
IL2RGExons 3–4NM_000206.3F: 5′-TGCAGTACCCAGATTGGCC-3′
R: 5′-GGCCTTAGCTGCTACATTCACG-3′
62594 °C 5 min, 36 cycles (94 °C 45 s, 60 °C 1 min, 72 °C 30 s), 72 °C 2 min[19]
Abbreviations: ADA, adenosine deaminase; DCLRE1C, DNA cross-link repair 1C; IL2RG, interleukin 2 receptor subunit gamma; F, forward; R, reverse; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pairs.
Table 4. Inheritance pattern of the pathogenic variants detected in the patients subjected to genetic analysis.
Table 4. Inheritance pattern of the pathogenic variants detected in the patients subjected to genetic analysis.
PatientSexImmune
Phenotype
GenePathogenic VariantsZygosityMode of Inheritance
P1MΤΒΝΚ SCIDADAc.58G>A
(p.Gly20Arg)
HetNot performed
(Maternal inheritance or de novo)
c.956_960del
(p.Glu319Glyfs)
HetPaternal inheritance
P2FΤΒΝΚ+ SCIDDCLRE1Cc.241C>T (p.Arg81 *)HetPaternal inheritance
Deletion of exons 1–3HetMaternal inheritance
P3MΤΒ+ΝΚ SCIDIL2RGc.437T>C (p.Leu146Pro)HmzDe novo
(Mother did not harbor the pathogenic variant)
Abbreviations: M, male; F, female; SCID, severe combined immunodeficiency; ADA, adenosine deaminase; DCLRE1C, DNA cross-link repair 1C; IL2RG, interleukin 2 receptor subunit gamma; Het, heterozygous; Hmz, hemizygous; * indicates a translation premature termination (stop) codon.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bakaros, E.; Sarrou, S.; Gkantaras, A.; Matziri, A.; Galanopoulos, A.P.; Charisi, K.; Bangeas, A.; Taparkou, A.; Papadimitriou, E.; Mouchtouri, V.A.; et al. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Molecular Diagnosis of Severe Combined Immunodeficiency. Medicina 2025, 61, 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091644

AMA Style

Bakaros E, Sarrou S, Gkantaras A, Matziri A, Galanopoulos AP, Charisi K, Bangeas A, Taparkou A, Papadimitriou E, Mouchtouri VA, et al. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Molecular Diagnosis of Severe Combined Immunodeficiency. Medicina. 2025; 61(9):1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091644

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bakaros, Evangelos, Styliani Sarrou, Antonios Gkantaras, Alexia Matziri, Achilleas P. Galanopoulos, Konstantina Charisi, Athanasios Bangeas, Anna Taparkou, Eleni Papadimitriou, Varvara A. Mouchtouri, and et al. 2025. "Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Molecular Diagnosis of Severe Combined Immunodeficiency" Medicina 61, no. 9: 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091644

APA Style

Bakaros, E., Sarrou, S., Gkantaras, A., Matziri, A., Galanopoulos, A. P., Charisi, K., Bangeas, A., Taparkou, A., Papadimitriou, E., Mouchtouri, V. A., Kalala, F., Hadjichristodoulou, C., Speletas, M., & Farmaki, E. (2025). Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in the Molecular Diagnosis of Severe Combined Immunodeficiency. Medicina, 61(9), 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61091644

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop