Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Deep Eutectic Solvent Extraction of Phenolic Acids and Tannins from Alchemilla vulgaris L.
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of UV-B Radiation on Flavonoids and Phenols Accumulation in Tempisque (Sideroxylon capiri Pittier) Callus
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spontaneous Regeneration of Plantlets Derived from Hairy Root Cultures of Lopezia racemosa and the Cytotoxic Activity of Their Organic Extracts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Polyploidization in Orchids: From Cellular Changes to Breeding Applications

by
Joe Abdul Vilcherrez-Atoche
1,2,*,†,‡,
Carla Midori Iiyama
1,2,‡ and
Jean Carlos Cardoso
2,*
1
Master Science Graduate Program of Plant Production and Associated Bioprocesses, Center of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos, Araras 13600-970, SP, Brazil
2
Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Tissue Culture, Department of Biotechnology, Plant and Animal Production, Center of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos, Araras 13600-970, SP, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Rodovia Anhanguera, km174, CEP, Araras 13603-271, SP, Brazil.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2022, 11(4), 469; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040469
Submission received: 16 December 2021 / Revised: 3 February 2022 / Accepted: 6 February 2022 / Published: 9 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Regeneration and Organ Formation)

Abstract

:
Polyploidy occurs naturally in plants through cell division errors or can artificially be induced by antimitotic agents and has ecological effects on species adaptation, evolution, and development. In agriculture, polyploidy provides economically improved cultivars. Furthermore, the artificial induction of polyploids increases the frequency; thus, it accelerates obtaining polyploid plants used in breeding programs. This is the reason for its use in developing many crops of economic interest, as is the case of orchids in the flower market. Polyploidy in ornamental plants is mainly associated with flowers of larger size, fragrance, and more intense coloring when compared to naturally diploid plants. Currently, orchids represent the largest flower market worldwide; thus, breeding programs aim to obtain flowers with the larger size, durability, intense colors, and resistance to pathogens. Furthermore, orchid hybridization with polyploidy induction has been used to produce improved hybrid cultivars. Thus, the objective of this review was to compile information regarding the natural occurrence, importance, and methods of induction of polyploidy in orchids. The study also summarizes the significance of polyploids and techniques associated with artificially inducing polyploidy in different orchids of commercial relevance.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polyploidy is defined as the increase in chromosome number, generating organisms with more than two complete sets of chromosomes. Polyploidy is one of the essential phenomena in plants and is responsible for species adaptation, diversification, evolution, and development [1]. It is estimated that about 70% of angiosperms have experienced polyploidy during their evolutionary history [2]. The highest frequencies of duplication of genetic material were mainly observed in domesticated plants instead of wild plants. The close relationship between domestication and polyploidy is due to the random selection of polyploid plants for their greater vigor; thus, polyploid species could be more successful and promising for domestication than wild ones [3]. Throughout evolution, the angiosperm genome experienced at least one chromosome duplication event [4], thus allowing original diploid individuals to generate other plants with different ploidy levels.
Polyploid organisms can be classified according to their origin into autopolyploid and allopolyploid [5]. An autopolyploid organism increases its basic number of chromosomes and is formed by the duplication of its genome [5,6]. An allopolyploid is formed from hybridization between different species and is characterized by having more than two basic sets of different chromosomes [6]. It is believed that the majority of flowering plants are allopolyploids (about 75%) [7,8].
Natural polyploidization in plant cells is often undergone through the endoreduplication process. However, the occurrence of endopolyploidy levels in plant organs are variable [9], and their frequency may differ due to certain factors like the taxonomic position of the plant, size of the genome, and dissimilarities between individuals of the same family or between varieties or ecotypes of the same species [9,10,11,12].
Another interesting aspect of natural polyploidy is the formation of unreduced gametes (2n). Harlane and De Wet [13] stated that 85 plant genera could produce unreduced gametes (2n), which results in natural polyploidization. Similarly, Franke [14] showed that 31 plant families had unreduced functional gametes. The development of unreduced gametes results in polyploidy in plants by the fusion of unreduced gametes or between a reduced and an unreduced gamete, originating polyploid organisms by sexual reproduction. This mechanism is mainly responsible for an increase in chromosome number in plants [5,13].

2. The Orchidaceae Family and Its Economic Importance in the World Floriculture

Orchids are a plant family with the largest number of species globally. There are 27,801 species [15], which are distributed worldwide, but their diversity and richness are concentrated in tropical and subtropical regions of the world.
Orchids have high commercial value in the international flower market due to the ornamental characteristics, such as shape, size, color, and durability of their flower [16]. In addition, orchids represent one of the world’s leading markets for cut and potted flowers. The most sought genera of the global floriculture markets are Phalaenopsis, Cymbidium, Dendrobium, and other tropical genera such as Oncidium, Cattleya, and Vanda [17].
Most orchid cultivars used as ornamental crops are the result of crosses between species (interspecific hybrids) and genera (intergeneric hybrids) [16], which give rise to groups of hybrids, some of them are multigeneric [18,19].
Due to the enormous global demand for orchids, many breeding programs have been undertaken for Phalaenopsis [20], Dendrobium [21], Cattleya [22], Cymbidium [23], Oncidium [24], etc. In addition, their ornamental and horticultural characteristics, such as accelerated development, vegetative and reproductive vigor, hardiness, and early flowering [18], have been incorporated to obtain high-quality new hybrid cultivars.
Among the so-called novelties developed by orchid breeding programs worldwide are the new groups of cultivars of the genus Phalaenopsis. These include: the “Harlequins” obtained from Phal. “Golden Peoker” through somaclonal variations; and miniaturized cultivars obtained by hybridization, mutation, and transgenics [25,26]. Phalaenopsis hybrids have been standing out for some time as the main pot flower in the global flower markets [27,28,29].
Additionally, the induction of polyploids is an important tool in the genetic improvement and hybridization of orchids [30]. This technique has been useful for improving and modifying plants’ vegetative and floral characteristics and also for restoring the fertility of some hybrid progenitors with low or no fertility, such as in triploid plants [31].

3. Orchid Karyotype

Cytogenetic knowledge is available only for a small number of orchid species [32]. Most studies have been concentrated on commercially important genera useful in floriculture, medicine, and food condiments, such as Cattleya, Cymbidium, Dendrobium, Oncidium, Phalaenopsis, Paphiopedilum, Vanilla, and Vanda [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. The most common techniques used for polyploid identification in these orchids are chromosomal counting [38,39,40] and nuclear DNA content estimation using flow cytometry (FCM) [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].
With 187 species described, most Cattleya species have a basic number of chromosomes x = 20. However, there are some exceptions, such as morphological variants of C. bicolor (C. bicolor ssp. bicolor has 2n = 40 and C. bicolor spp. minasgeraensis has 2n = 80) [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42], C. nobilior, which has 2n = 42, and also other tetraploid species of Cattleya (2n = 80) [32]. The other chromosomal variations reported are 21, 27 and 30 [32].
Chromosomal and cytological studies of Cymbidium species have demonstrated a predominance of 2n = 40 chromosomes [38,39], with variations observed in Cym. serratum (2n = 41, 43, 60, and 80). From the first Cymbidium polyploids reported in the early 20th century and through the biological and artificial techniques, it has been possible to develop a set of polyploid cultivars of Cymbidium [43]. Cymbidium cultivars are diploids, triploids, and tetraploids with reported differences in chromosomal morphology [40]. The polyploids have been reported in 75.8% of Cym. hybridum cultivars [44], demonstrating an association between the intentional or nonintentional selection of polyploids instead of diploids for superior characteristics.
In Dendrobium, most species have 2n = 38 chromosomes, in some species (e.g., Den. leonis and Den. dixanthum), they have 2n = 40 [34,37], and eight species of section Lautoria have 2n = 36. In Dendrobium, polyploids were associated with some species and hybrids [34].
In Phalaenopsis, most species have 2n = 38 chromosomes, except for the section Aphyllae, which has 2n = 34 and 36 chromosomes. However, there was observed a significant variation in the size of the chromosomes and genome of species and hybrids from this genus [36,45]. For example, Aoyama [46] reported significant variations in the number of chromosomes of Phalaenopsis cultivars: 2n = 38, 57, and 76–114, demonstrating polyploidy. Lee et al. [36] also observed, in 60 different Phalaenopsis hybrid cultivars conventionally used for flower cultivation, a large predominance (80%) of tetraploid cultivars (2n = 70–81 chromosomes) with 55% containing 2n = 4x = 76 chromosomes, with only one diploid (2n = 38) reported.
The high number of commercial tetraploids cultivars demonstrates the importance of polyploidy in the development of superior cultivars of Phalaenopsis. In addition, natural tetraploid species, such as Phal. amabilis and Phal. rimestandiana (both 2n = 4x = 76) and Phal. aphrodite subsp. formosana, are conventionally used in breeding for the production of tetraploid hybrids [6,20,47]. These tetraploid species are used as parental to obtain different groups of Phalaenopsis cultivars with different desired colors for commercial purposes [36,48,49].
Similar to Dendrobium and Phalaenopsis, orchid species of the genus Vanda contains 2n = 38 chromosomes [50,51], and the natural occurrence of tetraploid and hexaploid species [50,51,52]. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of Vanda with Aerides, Vandopsis, and Arachnis have demonstrated chromosomal uniformity (2n = 38). However, there are irregularities in the meiotic division observed in these intergeneric hybrids [53,54].
In the genus Oncidium, the basic number of chromosomes is believed to be x = 7, but unlike other genera, this has a large chromosomal variation among species, with the majority presenting polyploidy, such as tetraploids, hexaploids, and octoploids, numbers of chromosomes [55].

4. Natural Occurrence of Polyploid Cells in Orchids

4.1. Endopolyploidy

Endopolyploidy, commonly generated by endoreduplication, has been reported in different genera of orchids (Table 1). Tissue type, stage of development (early or late), and differences between varieties within the same species are the main factors that can influence the frequency and intensity of cellular endoreduplication [9,56,57,58]. In addition, abiotic environmental factors such as light and nutrients also affect the endoreduplication in plants [9]. For example, Lee et al. [59] reported that temperature influenced the occurrence of endopolyploidy in the cells of Phalaenopsis aphrodite and Oncidium varicosum orchids.
Other factors, such as phytoregulators, also influence the presence of different levels of endopolyploidy in plant tissues [9]. Lim and Loh [60] observed that sexual embryos of Vanda “Miss Joaquin” in the presence of 1-Naphthaleneacetic Acid (NAA) had higher levels of endopolyploidy in their cells compared to embryos in the presence of Gibberellic Acid (GA3), showing that synthetic auxins, such as NAA, are important induction factors that generate variations in ploidy levels in orchid cells.
Several studies have reported endopolyploidy in orchids with a wide variety of cells, tissues, and organs with natural polyploidization events (Table 1).
The main types of plant material used for the analysis and identification of endopolyploidy in orchids were leaf tissues (46% of the works), followed by parts of the flowers and roots. Other types of plant tissues were also reported, such as seeds (9%) and ovarian tissue (9%). Plant tissues from in vitro cultivation have also been used to determine ploidy variations in orchid cells. Protocorms (27%) and protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) (27%) are the most used tissue types to analyze the endopolyploidy, followed by embryos (sexual and somatic) and calluses with 23% and 9%, respectively.
Likewise, different orchid genera have been characterized by different levels of endopolyploidy. For example, nuclei with DNA contents up to 64C were observed in the genera Doritaenopsis [61,62] and Vanda [60,63], followed by nuclei with DNA content up to 32C for Dendrobium [64,65], Phalaenopsis [56,57,58,59,66,67,68,69,70], and Vanilla [71]. For the genera, Oncidium [59,69], Cymbidium [58,72,73,74], and Spathoglottis [75], nuclei with DNA contents up to 16C were found, and the lowest levels of nuclei with DNA contents were seen for Cattleya [76] up to 8C (Table 1).
Table 1. Endopolyploidy observed in different orchid species.
Table 1. Endopolyploidy observed in different orchid species.
Species/CultivarPlant MaterialNuclear DNA ContentReferences
Cattleya tigrinaLeaves, leaf bases, leaf tips, roots, Protocorm-like Bodies (PLBs)2C, 4C, 8CLiz [76]
Cymbidium sp.Embryo Parenchymal Cells Nagl [73]
Nine comercial hybrids of CymbidiumCallus and PLBs2C, 4C, 8C, 16CTeixeira et al. [58]
Cym. Twilight Moon ‘Day LightCallus and PLBs2C, 4C, 8C, 16CTeixeira da Silva; Singh; Tanaka [74]
Two comercial hybrids of Cymbidium and Cym. kanranPLBs2C, 4C, 8C, 16CFukai; Hasegawa; Goi [72]
Dendrobium sp.Root tips and new leaves Jones; Kuehnle [64]
Den. Chao Praya SmileSeeds, Protocorms, Protocorms with leaves, stem tips, axillary buds and pseudobulbs, leaves, roots and flowers2C, 4C, 8C, 16C, 32CSeah [65]
Doritaenopsis hybridSomatic embryos2C, 4C, 8C, 16C, 32C, 64CPark; Paek [61]
DoritaenopsisSomatic leaves, roots and embryos2C, 8C, 16, 64CPark; Yeung; Paek [62]
Oncidium varicosumFlowers2C, 4C, 8C, 16CLee et al. [69]
Onc. varicosumFlowers2C, 4C, 8C, 16CLee et al. [59]
Phal. aphrodite subsp. formosanasepals, petals, lip, columns, pollinia, pedicels, ovaries of
fully open flowers, roots, protocorms, seedling leaves
2C, 4C, 8C, 16C, 32CChen et al. [66]
Phal. aphrodite subsp. formosanaOvarian tissue before/after pollination, seeds and protocorms2C, 4C, 8C, 16CJean et al. [57]
Phal. aphrodite subsp. formosanaFlowers2C, 4C, 8C, 16CLee et al. [69]
Phal. spp.Protocorms Chen et al. [56]
Phal. spp.Protocorms, PLBs and young leaves2C, 4C, 8C, 16CChen; Tang; Kao [68]
Phal. spp.PLBs and young leaves2C, 4C, 8CChen; Tang [67]
Phal. spp.Flowers, roots and leaves2C, 4C, 8C, 16CLin et al. [70]
Spatoglottis plicataLeaves, roots, floral tissue, protocorms, young seedling leaves, roots2C, 4C, 8C, 16CYang; Loh [75]
Vanda Miss JoaquinLeaves, buds, aerial and terrestrial roots, petals, sepals, pedicels, spine, sexual embryos2C, 4C, 8C, 16C, 32C, 64CLim; Loh [60]
V. sanderianaSomatic embryos 2C, 4C, 8CAlvarez [63]
Vanilla planifoliaRoots2C, 4C, 8C, 16C, 32CKausch; Horner [71]
PLBs: Protocorm-like bodies.
The endopolyploidy observed in orchid cells of different types of tissues and organs can be used for the induction and regeneration of complete polyploid plants from endopolyploidy cells, thorugh the use of plant tissue culture techniques [56], and that can be usefull as a biotechnological tool for orchid polyploid cultivar development. Chen et al. [56] developed a technique for the genus Phalaenopsis that consists of successive cycles of horizontal sectioning of protocorms and PLBs, thus inducing the natural endopolyploidy cells in these organs to new PLBs formation, which formed solid polyploid plants after regeneration [56,67,68].

4.2. Occurrence of Unreduced Gametes

In orchids, more than one million pollen grains are grouped into a cohesive mass called pollinia [77]. Cytological pollen studies in orchids have shown the formation of unreduced gametes, which are more frequent in cultivars resulting from interspecific and intergeneric hybridization [78]. In some orchid genera like cultivars of Cymbidium, Zeng et al. [79] observed that the frequency of unreduced (2n) gametes ranged from 0.15% to 4.03%, depending on the genotype. After seven different crosses between these cultivars, they observed two tetraploids and three triploid hybrids with good in vitro regeneration behavior and high survival during acclimatization. Thus, progenitor cultivars with a higher frequency of unreduced gametes could be used to induce polyploidy in Cymbidium breeding programs without inhibiting the mitotic spindle and with no carcinogenic risk to animal cells, commonly associated with the manipulation and treatment of plant tissues and organs with antimitotic agents, such as colchicine.
The main mechanisms of natural polyploidization in Phalaenopsis are hybridization and endopolyploidy. However, after analyzing the chromosomes of 60 Phalaenopsis cultivars, Lee et al. [36] suggested that, in addition to endopolyploidy, the formation of unreduced gametes could also be responsible at least in part for the expressive frequency and number of polyploid genotypes.
There are also reports regarding the formation of unreduced gametes in other orchid genera and species, such as Plocoglottis, Calanthe, Spathoglotis, Phaius [78], Bletilla striata var. gebine [80], Epipactis latifolia [81], Aerides odoratum, Doritis pulcherrima, and Vanda denisoniana [82].

5. Artificial Induction of Polyploidy in Orchids

Polyploidy is artificially induced by applying antimitotic agents such as colchicine, oryzalin, trifluralin, propyzamide, and amiprofos-methyl (APM) on tissues, organs, or entire plants [83]. These chemicals are used in vitro to interfere during cell division, generating chromosome duplication in plant cells [84]. Antimitotic agents are grouped according to the phase of the cell cycle that they affect. Some agents can affect the end of the S phase or middle of the M phase (late-stage). Other agents act before the S phase, being the most significant group used for the artificial induction of polyploids [84]. The substance most widely used for polyploidy induction in plants is colchicine, an alkaloid extracted from the seeds and bulbs of Colchicum autumnale plants [84,85]. Before colchicine, Randolph [86] induced artificial polyploidy through high-temperature treatment in early-stage embryos of maize, generating tetraploids. Similarly, Blakeslee and Avery [87] obtained somatic polyploidization using high- and low-temperature heat treatments, but these techniques were not efficient for the induction of polyploids. Blakeslee and Avery [87] and Eigsti [88] conducted the first tests using ex vitro colchicine to plant-inducing polyploidy.
Murashige and Nakano [89] were the first to report spontaneous polyploidy in tobacco callus under in vitro conditions in response to the increase of explant subcultures. They recommended in vitro plant growth as an efficient tool to artificially induce polyploidy [90].
Currently, there are a large number of protocols for in vitro chromosome duplication in many plant species, including orchids. Figure 1 summarizes the main types of explants used and the workflow aimed at obtaining artificial autopolyploid plants in orchids through chemical antimitotics. The efficiency in generating these types of polyploids depends on the type, concentration, and exposure time to the antimitotic agent, explant type and age, in vitro induction protocol, and direct or indirect methods for confirming chromosomal duplication [84]. Among the various benefits are that polyploidy causes increased vigor, allowing more remarkable adaptation to extreme climatic conditions [91]; an overall increase in organs size due to multiple copies of genes, resulting in a phenomenon known as the gigas effect, is also observed [90,91].
Studies at the Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Tissue Culture (CCA/UFSCar, Araras, Brazil) revealed that in vitro autopolyploid plantlets of the Cattleya hybrid induced by colchicine showed distinct morphology. These plants were more compact, with wider and thicker leaves (Figure 1A,B), than those that were not polyploid (Figure 1C,D). Other interesting characteristics associated with polyploid organisms include the buffering genome, heterosis, increased heterozygosity, restoration of hybrid fertility, reduced fertility in autopolyploids, and seedless fruits [89,90]. In addition, flowering in polyploid organisms results in improved ornamental features, such as the larger size and intensity of pigments [92] and longer durability [90]. These characteristics associated with polyploidy are desirable and valuable in orchid breeding programs [93]. Among the various benefits of polyploidy for orchid cultivation, the restoration of fertility of hybrids and changes in the morphological and anatomical characteristics, such as increased leaf thickness and length, increased stomata, and the increased size and texture of flowers, besides influencing the flowering periods, are the most significant ones [94,95].

5.1. Cattleya Genus

The induced polyploidy in Cattleya can be used for obtaining the compact size of plants, increased flower longevity, a greater number of flowerings throughout the year, flowers with higher firmness (substance), and greater resistance to transport. These are the biggest challenges for the expansion of Cattleya cultivation and marketing [18].
In two studies, polyploidy was induced in Cattleya, where the PLBs and seedlings were used as explants for in vitro cultivation. Colchicine was used in one study at concentrations of 0.05–0.2%, and the exposure time ranged from two to four days. Another study compared the use of two polyploidy-inducing agents, viz., colchicine (0–12.5 mM) and oryzalin (0–50 µM) (Table 2). Unfortunately, despite numerous hybrids used in the Cattleya flower market, only C. intermedia and C. tigrina have been reported in the literature.
For C.a intermedia, the best treatments for polyploid induction using colchicine were 0.05% (for clone 114–75% of tetraploids) and 0.1% (for clone 121–40% of tetraploids), both treated for eight days, showing a strong genotype-dependent response [96].

5.2. Cymbidium Genus

The first use of antimitotics and induction of polyploidy in the genus Cymbidium was reported by Menninger [98], Wimber, and Van Cott [99] and Kim et al. [100]. From 2009 to 2021, there were nine studies on polyploidy induction using antimitotic agents in Cymbidium, of which eight were performed with hybrid cultivars (Table 3).
Similar to Cattleya, in Cymbidium, most polyploid induction studies were performed under in vitro conditions, and the PLBs were the primary type of explants (55.6%). Other explants included were protocorms, rhizomes, seedlings, and young shoots (Table 3).
The rates of obtaining polyploid plants ranged from 11.1% to 60%, and colchicine was used as an antimitotic in 89% of the studies and oryzalin in only two studies. The highest regeneration rates were obtained with colchicine in 0.03–0.05% concentrations and drug exposure times ranging from 4 to 7 days (Table 3). The use of oryzalin in two Cymbidium hybrids made it possible to obtain tetraploids at concentrations of 5–10 mg L−1. However, colchicine was more efficient than oryzalin in PLB survival and polyploid frequency [101]. Another fact reported by these authors was the strong genotype-dependent response, and up to 60% of polyploids were reported in Cym. Show Girls, while, in Cym. Mystery Island, maximally 16.7% of the polyploids were obtained.

5.3. Dendrobium Genus

Similar to other genera, most polyploidy induction studies have been carried out under in vitro culture environments. The induction of polyploidy under ex vitro conditions was performed by Vichiato et al. [93] on Den. nobile by the immersion of plants and seedlings in a solution of colchicine at 10 mg L−1 for 96 h, which resulted in 29.17% being tetraploid plants. However, these polyploid plants demonstrated a slower and reduced vigorous development concerning those of diploids.
Colchicine was the main antimitotic agent used for the artificial induction of polyploidy in Dendrobium. The concentrations of colchicine ranged from 0.01 to 0.2%, and the treatment time ranged from 1 to 14 days of antimitotic exposure. The main explants chosen for the induction of polyploidy in vitro in Dendrobium were the PLBs and protocorms.
About 75% and 80% of the polyploids were obtained at concentrations of 0.2% of colchicine exposed for two days and 0.05% of colchicine for three days, respectively, using the PLBs as explants [108,109] (Table 4). In addition, three studies used oryzalin, propyzamide, and AMP for polyplodization (Table 4). In addition to oryzalin [110], propyzamide at 100 µM for two days [111] and amiprofos-methyl (AMP) at concentrations of 10 mg L−1 for 12 to 48 h [112] showed good efficiency in obtaining Dendrobium polyploids.

5.4. Phalaenopsis Genus

Griesbach [20] was one of the pioneer used in vitro tools for artificial induction of chromosomal polyploidization in Phalaenopsis. Protocorms of Phal. Equestris, Phal. Fasciata, and Phal. “Betty Hausermann” were exposed to 50 mg L−1 of colchicine for ten days, resulting in 46% with polyploid seedlings [20]. Griesbach [121] used a similar technique with a colchicine treatment to restore the fertility of the triploid hybrid Phal. Golden Sands “Canary” and obtained 50% of hexaploid plants (fertile), which were successfully used as parental plants to develop new cultivars with a greater intensity of colors, sizes, and shapes, such as the pentaploid (2n = 5x = 95) Phal. Meadowlark [121].
Twelve polyploid induction studies were reported for the genus Phalaenopsis, and colchicine was used in 80% of these studies in concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 5000 mg L−1. The colchicine exposure time lasted from 3 to 10 days. Oryzalin was applied only in one study (Table 5).
The main explants chosen for the in vitro induction of polyploids are protocorms [20,30,121,122]. On the other hand, the explants chosen for the ex vitro induction are seedlings and flowers (bud flowers and pollinated flowers) [123,124,125] (Table 5). Furthermore, it was observed that, unlike other genera, in Phalaenopsis, 50% of the studies in the literature used organs or entire plants exposed to colchicine under ex vitro conditions to obtain polyploid plants.
Interestingly, several studies were performed on Phal. amabilis (64%) during 2013–2021 (Table 5). Despite the reduced commercial importance of this species compared to the hybrids, it has been extensively studied under in vitro culture conditions and for different purposes, possibly serving as an in vitro regeneration model among the many Phalaenopsis genotypes. Among these studies, we would like to highlight the treatment of nitrous oxide to pollen grains of Phal.s amabilis (2n = 2x = 38), which was used to obtain seeds and seedlings from the treated pollen grains. In which the treatment for 24 h resulted in up to 35.6% triploid and 6.7% tetraploid plants, which was more efficient than the treatment for 48 h. Furthermore, Azmi et al. [123] obtained up to 100% tetraploid plants of Phal. amabilis using colchicine (0 to 2000 mg L−1) soaked in wet cotton covered with aluminum foil and applied to the ovaries and stigma three days after self-pollination.

5.5. Induction of Polyploidy in Oncidium, Vanda, and Others

There have been a few reports on the artificial induction of polyploidy in the genus Oncidium. Unemoto et al. [130] observed that an increased exposure time of protocorms of Onc. flexuosum to colchicine resulted in the increased death of explants, and the surviving seedlings demonstrated morphological alterations with a reduction of shoots and roots. However, the authors did not analyze the ploidy level of the regenerated plants. Therefore, it is difficult to tell if these changes were due to the colchicine phytotoxicity or polyploidization of the regenerated plants. Similarly, Cui et al. [131] also observed morphological changes such as smaller and more robust plants, thick leaves, and longer stomata lengths associated with polyploids, compared to the untreated diploid plants of nonidentified/specified Oncidium obtained from thin cell layers of PLBs treated with different concentrations and exposure times of colchicine.
Nakasone [132] was the first to induce polyploidy in Vanda “Miss Joaquín” using young shoots treated with different concentrations of colchicine (0.5% and 1.5%) for 2 and 6 days of exposure (Table 6). More recently, Tuwo and Indrianto [133] obtained polyploid plants from protocorms treated with colchicine (0.5% for 6 h) for the hybrid of V.a limbiata Blume X V. tricolor Lindl. var. suavis. The regenerated polyploid plants presented a smaller number and width of leaves, smaller number and length of roots, and a greater stomatic size and lower stomatal index (Table 6).
There have been two studies on the genus Rhynchostylis, correlated with Vanda, in which colchicine was applied to PLBs in one study [134]. The herbicide propyzamide was applied to seeds of two genotypes of this genus to induce polyploidy [111].
In addition to these, studies with the genera Calanthe, Epidendrum, Odontioda, and Paphiopedilum were also reported (Table 6).

6. Conclusions

The high frequency of endopolyploidy, together with the presence of polysomatic organs and tissues, were observed in different orchid genera. In vitro regeneration pathways, such as PLBs induction and regeneration from tissues with a high frequency of endoreduplication, can be used to obtain polyploid plants without antimitotic treatment. Additionally, the development of unreduced gametes was reported in some species of Orchidaceae, which is a natural mechanism of polyploidization. These genotypes were used as parents in breeding programs. The use of antimitotic agents is an efficient technique for the artificial production of polyploid plants, which increases the number of genotypes with useful ornamental characteristics in the world flower industry. The genera Cymbidium, Dendrobium, and Phalaenopsis, with the most significant impact on the world’s floriculture, have the highest number of published studies and reports on obtaining polyploid plants. In vitro cultivation, using protocorms and PLBs as explants and colchicine as an antimitotic agent has most widely been used for the artificial induction of polyploids in orchids.

7. Further Prospects

Although colchicine is widely used to increase the frequency of polyploids in orchids, most studies have evaluated the effectiveness of its concentration and exposure. Furthermore, few studies have been focused on assessing the conditions of its application on the explants. The different exposure times, treatment temperatures, and joint applications of products that increase the absorption of colchicine by tissues or reduce its toxicity needs to be better understood. Most studies have reported a pronounced effect of this reagent on the survival of treated explants and different symptoms associated with phytotoxicity on tissues, with biochemical changes and plantlet development after treatment. However, practically no studies have been reported to alleviate the phytotoxic effects of this reagent on explant development, which are limited by successive washing with distilled or deionized water. Another relevant fact of using colchicine, besides its high cost, is toxicity to humans and animals, resulting in short-, medium-, and long-term effects [138]. Thus, the generation of more natural polyploid plants by promoting the formation of new PLBs from polysomatic tissues or by increase studies with unreduced gametes are exciting strategies with lower risks than colchicine induction.
The correlation between polyploidy and genetic improvement is remarkable. In some genera, like Phalaenopsis [36], polyploid commercial hybrids are predominately used in floriculture.
Although most Phalaenopsis hybrid cultivars are protected in terms of commercialization, a strategy that could be further explored by breeding companies would be the use of triploid and pentaploid cultivars, which also have limitations in terms of sexual reproduction.
Another relevant fact is the lack of studies that contemplate haploid and double-haploid plant technology in orchids, a technology currently used for large crops with diverse breeding and genetic applications.

Author Contributions

J.A.V.-A. contributed to the main idea, reference survey, writing, tables, and figures of the manuscript. C.M.I. contributed to a review of the literature, writing, and revision of the manuscript. J.C.C. contributed to a review of the literature, writing, and final review and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES)–Finance Code 001 and in part by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPQ, Brazil)—Process Number 311083/2018-8.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All tables and figures are original from authors.

Acknowledgments

JCC thanks the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for Process Number 2018/20673-3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, either financially or otherwise.

References

  1. Soltis, D.E.; Albert, V.A.; Leebens-Mack, J.; Bell, C.D.; Paterson, A.H.; Zheng, C.; Sankoff, D.; de Pamphilis, C.W.; Wall, P.K.; Soltis, P.S. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Masterson, J. Stomatal Size in Fossil Plants: Evidence for Polyploidy in Majority of Angiosperms. Science 1994, 264, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Salman-Minkov, A.; Sabath, N.; Mayrose, I. Whole-genome duplication as a key factor in crop domestication. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 16115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jiao, Y.; Wickett, N.J.; Ayyampalayam, S.; Chanderbali, A.S.; Landherr, L.; Ralph, P.E.; Tomsho, L.P.; Hu, Y.; Liang, H.; Soltis, P.S.; et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 2011, 473, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ramsey, J.; Schemske, D.W. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998, 29, 467–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Chen, Z.J. Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigor. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Brochmann, C.; Brysting, A.K.; Alsos, I.G.; Borgen, L.; Grundt, H.H.; Scheen, A.; Elven, R. Polyploidy in arctic plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2004, 82, 521–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Grant, V. Plant Speciation; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  9. Maluszynska, J.; Kolano, B.; Sas-Nowosielska, H. Endopolyploidy in Plants. In Plant Genome Diversity; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2013; Volume 2, pp. 99–119. [Google Scholar]
  10. Barow, M.; Meister, A. Endopolyploidy in seed plants is differently correlated to systematics, organ, life strategy and genome size. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26, 571–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beemster, G.T.; De Vusser, K.; De Tavernier, E.; De Bock, K.; Inze, D. Variation in Growth Rate between Arabidopsis Ecotypes Is Correlated with Cell Division and A-Type Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Activity. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129, 854–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Galbraith, D.W.; Harkins, K.R.; Knapp, S. Systemic Endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96, 985–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Harlan, J.R.; Dewet, J.M.J. On, Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy. Bot. Rev. 1975, 41, 361–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Franke, R. Über Das Auftreten von Unreduzierten Gameten Bei Angiospermen; Arch. ZUchtungsforsch: Berlin, Germany, 1975; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  15. The Plant List. 2020. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/1.1/browse/A/Orchidaceae/#statistics (accessed on 28 August 2021).
  16. De, L.C.; Rao, A.N.; Rajeevan, P.K.; Pathak, P. Orchid improvement-an overview. J. Orchid. Soc. India 2014, 28, 35–45. [Google Scholar]
  17. De, L.C.; Pathak, P.; Rao, A.N.; Rajeevan, P.K. 2 Global Orchid Industry. In Commercial Orchids; De Gruyter Open Poland: Warsaw, Poland, 2015; pp. 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cardoso, J.C.; Martinelli, A.P.; da Silva, J.A.T. A novel approach for the selection of Cattleya hybrids for precocious and season-independent flowering. Euphytica 2016, 210, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cardoso, J.C. Ionocidium Cerrado 101: Intergeneric orchid hybrid with high quality of blooming. Ornam. Hortic. 2017, 23, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Griesbach, R.J. Colchicine-induced polyploidy in phalaenopsis orchids. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1981, 1, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kaiser, R. The Scent of Orchids; Elsevier Science Publisher: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  22. Herman, D.E. The Species behind Standard Cattleyas. Orchids 1997, 66, 234–243. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, M.-S.; Cho, H.-R.; Rhee, H.-K.; Lim, J.-H.; Shin, H.-K. Development of New Cymbidium Variety ‘White Girl’ Medium Type, Red Lip Flower. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2010, 51, 235–238. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bhattacharjee, S.K.; De, L.C. Advanced Commercial Floriculture; Aavishkar Publishers: Rajasthan, India, 2003; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tang, C.-Y.; Chen, W.-H. Breeding and Development of New Varieties in Phalaenopsis. Orchid. Biotechnol. 2007, 57, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hsieh, K.-T.; Liu, S.-H.; Wang, I.-W.; Chen, L.-J. Phalaenopsis orchid miniaturization by overexpression of OsGA2ox6, a rice GA2-oxidase gene. Bot. Stud. 2020, 61, 10–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, C. An economic analysis of orchid production under protected facilities in taiwan: Case of phalaenopsis. Acta Hortic. 2002, 30, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hinsley, A.; De Boer, H.J.; Fay, M.F.; Gale, S.W.; Gardiner, L.M.; Gunasekara, R.S.; Kumar, P.; Masters, S.; Metusala, D.; Roberts, D.; et al. A review of the trade in orchids and its implications for conservation. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2017, 186, 435–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, C. The Fundamental Issue in the Phalaenopsis Industry in the Netherlands. J. Agric. For. 2020, 67, 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  30. Miguel, T.P.; Leonhardt, K.W. In vitro polyploid induction of orchids using oryzalin. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 130, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ranney, T.G. Polyploidy: From Evolution to New Plant Development. Comb. Proc. Int. Plant Propagators Soc. 2006, 56, 137–142. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas_Ranney/publication/228633988_Polyploidy_From_Evolution_to_New_Plant_DevelopmentC/links/0046352b095c13de6a000000.pdf (accessed on 3 September 2021).
  32. Felix, L.P.; Guerra, M. Variation in chromosome number and the basic number of subfamily Epidendroideae (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 163, 234–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bory, S.; Catrice, O.; Brown, S.; Leitch, I.J.; Gigant, R.; Chiroleu, F.; Grisoni, M.; Duval, M.-F.; Besse, P. Natural polyploidy in Vanilla planifolia (Orchidaceae). Genome 2008, 51, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jones, K.; Lim, K.Y.; Cribb, P.J. The Chromosomes of Orchids VII Dendrobium. Kew Bull. 1982, 37, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kao, Y.-Y.; Chang, S.-B.; Lin, T.-Y.; Hsieh, C.-H.; Chen, Y.-H. Differential Accumulation of Heterochromatin as a Cause for Karyotype Variation in Phalaenopsis Orchids. Ann. Bot. 2001, 87, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lee, Y.-I.; Tseng, Y.; Chung, M.-C. Chromosome constitution and nuclear DNA content of Phalaenopsis hybrids. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 262, 109089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wilfret, G.J.; Kamemoto, H. Genome and Karyotype Relationships in the Genus Dendrobium (Orchidaceae). Cytologia 1971, 36, 604–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wimber, J.; Donald, E. Cytogenetic Studies in the Genus Cymbidium (Tese Dee Doutorado); Claremont Graduate University: Claremont, CA, USA, 1956; Available online: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=cgu_etd (accessed on 12 October 2021).
  39. Yu-Ge, L.I.; Wei-Hong, G.U.O.; Bo-Ji, W.U. A Karyological Study of Seven Species and One Variety of Cymbidium from China. J. Syst. Evol. 2002, 40, 406–413. [Google Scholar]
  40. Younis, A.; Ryu, K.B.; Hwang, Y.-J.; Jee, S.O.; Kim, M.-S.; Kim, C.K.; Lim, K.-B. Analysis of Chromosomes and Nuclear DNA Content in Nine Genotypes of Cymbidium. Flower Res. J. 2013, 21, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mohammadi, M.; Kaviani, B.; Sedaghathoor, S. In vivo polyploidy induction of Phalaenopsis amabilis in a bubble bioreactor system using colchicine. Ornam. Hortic. 2021, 27, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Blumenschein, A. Uma Nova Espécie Do Gênero Cattleya Lindl. Publicação Científica Instituto de Genética Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz. Genética Esc. 1961, 2, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
  43. Xie, L.; Zhou, S.; Wang, M.; Zeng, R.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Z. Creation and micropropagation of polyploids in Cymbidium hybridum. Acta Hortic. 2017, 16, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhu, G.F.; Lü, F.B.; Wang, B.Q.; Chen, M.L. Chromosome Analysis of Hybrid Cymbidium. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2006, 33, 417–421. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee, Y.-I.; Chung, M.-C.; Kuo, H.-C.; Wang, C.-N.; Lin, C.-Y.; Jiang, H.; Yeh, C.-H. The evolution of genome size and distinct distribution patterns of rDNA in Phalaenopsis (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2017, 185, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aoyama, M. Polyploidy in Phalaenopsis Hybrids; Bulletin of the Hiroshima Prefectural Agriculture Research Center: Higashihiroshima, Japan, 1993; Volume 57, pp. 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  47. Griesbach, R.J. Development of Phalaenopsis Orchids for the Mass-Market. In Trends in New Crops and New Uses; Janick, J., Whipkey, A., Eds.; ASHS Press: Alexandria, Egypt, 2002; pp. 458–465. Available online: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.454.6479&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 22 October 2021).
  48. Bolaños-Villegas, P.; Chen, F.-C. Cytological Identification of Chromosomal Rearrangements in Doritaenopsis and Phalaenopsis. J. Intl. Coop 2007, 2, 1–11. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pablo_Bolanos-Villegas2/publication/262373813_Cytological_identification_of_chromosomal_rearrangements_in_Doritaenopsis_and_Phalaenopsis/links/0c960538124efa044a000000/Cytological-identification-of-chromosomal-rearrang (accessed on 15 September 2021).
  49. Chuang, H.T.; Hsu, S.T.; Shen, T.M. Breeding Barriers in Yellow Phalaenopsis Orchids. J. Taiwan Soc. Hort. Sci. 2008, 54, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jones, K. The Chromosomes of Orchids: II: Vandeae Lindl. Kew Bull. 1967, 21, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shindo, K.; Kamemoto, H. Karyotype analysis of some sarcanthine orchids. Am. J. Bot. 1963, 50, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Storey, W.B. Chromosome Numbers of Some Vanda Species and Hybrids. Bull. Amer. Orchid Soc. 1952, 21, 801–806. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kamemoto, H.; Shindo, K. Meiosis in Interspecific and Intergeneric Hybrids of Vanda. Bot. Gaz. 1964, 125, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yip, M.-Y. Cytological Studies of Some Aranda (Arachnis × Vanda) Hybrids (Orchidaceae). Cytologia 1977, 42, 565–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Félix, L.P.; Guerra, M. Cytogenetics and cytotaxonomy of some Brazilian species of Cymbidioid orchids. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2000, 23, 957–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, W.-H.; Kao, Y.-L.; Tang, C.-Y.; Jean, G.-T.; Chen, H.-H. Endopolyploidy in Phalaenopsis Orchids and Its Application in Polyploid Breeding. Orchid. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 25–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jean, G.-T.; Kao, Y.-L.; Tang, C.-Y.; Chen, W.-H. Distribution of Nuclei of Different Ploidy Levels during Ovule, Seed and Protocorm Development in Phalaenopsis aphrodite subsp. formosana (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 2, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. da Silva, J.A.T.; Giang, D.T.T.; Dobránszki, J.; Zeng, S.; Tanaka, M. Ploidy analysis of Cymbidium, Phalaenopsis, Dendrobium and Paphiopedillum (Orchidaceae), and Spathiphyllum and Syngonium (Araceae). Biologia 2014, 69, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, H.-C.; Chen, Y.-J.; Markhart, A.H.; Lin, T.-Y. Temperature effects on systemic endoreduplication in orchid during floral development. Plant Sci. 2007, 172, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lim, W.L.; Loh, C.S. Endopolyploidy in Vanda Miss Joaquim (Orchidaceae). New Phytol. 2003, 159, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Park, S.-Y.; Paek, K.-Y. Endoreduplication Pattern of Somatic Embryos and Variants Occurrence Affected by Pre-existed Endoreduplicated Cells in Doritaenopsis. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2006, 33, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Park, S.-Y.; Yeung, E.C.; Paek, K.-Y. Endoreduplication in Phalaenopsis is affected by light quality from light-emitting diodes during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2010, 4, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Alvarez, M.R. Quantitative changes in nuclear dna accompanying postgermination embryonic development in Vanda (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 1968, 55, 1036–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jones, W.E.; Kuehnle, A.R. Ploidy Identification Using Flow Cytometry in Tissues of Dendrobium Species and Cultivars. Lindleyana 1998, 13, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  65. Seah, K.T. Endopolyploidy in Dendrobium Chao Praya Smile and Anthurium andraeanum Cv’ red Hot’ (Tese de Mestrado). 2009. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/48630159.pdf (accessed on 18 September 2021).
  66. Chen, W.-H.; Tang, C.-Y.; Lin, T.-Y.; Weng, Y.-C.; Kao, Y.-L. Changes in the endopolyploidy pattern of different tissues in diploid and tetraploid Phalaenopsis aphrodite subsp. formosana (Orchidaceae). Plant Sci. 2011, 181, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chen, W.-H.; Tang, C.-Y. A Protocol for the Induction of Polyploids in Phalaenopsis Orchids by In Vitro Method Without Using Anti-microtubule Agents. In Orchid Propagation: From Laboratories to Greenhouses—Methods and Protocols; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, W.H.; Tang, C.Y.; Kao, Y.L. Ploidy doubling by in vitro culture of excised protocorms or protocorm-like bodies in Phalaenopsis species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2009, 98, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lee, H.-C.; Chiou, D.-W.; Chen, W.-H.; Markhart, A.H.; Chen, Y.-H.; Lin, T.-Y. Dynamics of cell growth and endoreduplication during orchid flower development. Plant Sci. 2004, 166, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lin, S.; Lee, H.-C.; Chen, W.-H.; Chen, C.-C.; Kao, Y.-Y.; Fu, Y.-M.; Chen, Y.-H.; Lin, T.-Y. Nuclear DNA Contents of Phalaenopsis sp. and Doritis pulcherrima. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2001, 126, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kausch, A.P.; Horner, H.T. Increased Nuclear DNA Content in Raphide Crystal Idioblasts during Development in Vanilla planifolia L. (Orchidaceae). Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1984, 33, 7–12. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Harry-Horner/publication/16498377_Increased_nuclear_DNA_content_in_raphide_crystal_idioblasts_during_development_in_Vanilla_planifolia_L_Orchidaceae/links/59dbbef5458515e9ab451ddf/Increased-nuclear-DNA-content-in-raphi (accessed on 22 September 2021).
  72. Fukai, S.; Hasegawa, A.; Goi, M. Polysomaty in Cymbidium. HortScience 2002, 37, 1088–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Nagl, W. Evidence of DNA Amplification in the Orchid Cymbidium in Vitro. Cytobios 1972, 5, 145–154. [Google Scholar]
  74. Da Silva, J.A.T.; Singh, N.; Tanaka, M. Priming biotic factors for optimal protocorm-like body and callus induction in hybrid Cymbidium (Orchidaceae), and assessment of cytogenetic stability in regenerated plantlets. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2006, 84, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yang, M.; Loh, C.S. Systemic endopolyploidy in Spathoglottis plicata (Orchidaceae) development. BMC Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Liz, R.D.D. Citometria de Fluxo, Análises Ultraestruturais e Bioquímica de Estruturas Semelhantes a Protocormos (ESPs) de Cattleya tigrina A. Richard (Tese de Mestrado). 2017. Available online: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/187571/PRGV0268-T.pdf?sequence=-1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 10 July 2021).
  77. Johnson, S.D.; Edwards, T.J. The structure and function of orchid pollinaria. Oesterreichische Bot. Z. 2000, 222, 243–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Teoh, S.B. Polyploid spore formation in diploid orchid species. Genetica 1984, 63, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zeng, R.-Z.; Zhu, J.; Xu, S.-Y.; Du, G.-H.; Guo, H.-R.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.-S.; Xie, L. Unreduced Male Gamete Formation in Cymbidium and Its Use for Developing Sexual Polyploid Cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Miduno, T. Chromosomenstudien an Orchidazeen. III. Cytologia 1940, 11, 156–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Hagerup, O. The Spontaneous Formation of Haploid, Polyploid, and Aneuploid Embryos in Some Orchids. K. Dansk. Videnskab. Selskab. Biol. Meddelel. 1947, 20, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kamemoto, H.; Kasemsap, S.; Sagarik, R. Chromosome Numbers of Sarcanthine Orchid Species of Thailand. Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam. Soc. 1964, 10, 85. [Google Scholar]
  83. Germanà, M.A. Use of Irradiated Pollen to Induce Parthenogenesis and Haploid Production in Fruit Crops. In Plant Mutation Breeding and Biotechnology; Shu, Q.Y., Forester, B.P., Nakagawa, H., Eds.; CABI and FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012; pp. 411–421. [Google Scholar]
  84. Dhooghe, E.; Van Laere, K.; Eeckhaut, T.; Leus, L.; Van Huylenbroeck, J. Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010, 104, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Eigsti, O.J.; Dustin, P. Colchicine in Agriculture, Medicine, Biology, Chemistry; Iowa University Press: Ames, Iowa, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  86. Randolph, L.F. Some Effects of High Temperature on Polyploidy and Other Variations in Maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1932, 18, 222. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1076195/pdf/pnas01731-0012.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Blakeslee, A.F.; Avery, A.G. Methods of inducing doubling of chromosomes in plants. J. Hered. 1937, 28, 393–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Eigsti, O.J. A Cytological Study of Colchicine Effects in the Induction of Polyploidy in Plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1938, 24, 56. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1077028/pdf/pnas01790-0006.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Murashige, T.; Nakano, R. Tissue Culture as a Potential Tool in Obtaining Polyploid Plants. J. Hered. 1966, 57, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sattler, M.C.; Carvalho, C.R.; Clarindo, W.R. The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 2015, 243, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Eng, W.-H.; Ho, W.-S. Polyploidization using colchicine in horticultural plants: A review. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 246, 604–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kuehnle, A.R. Orchids. In Flower Breeding and Genetics; Anderson, N.O., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 539–560. Available online: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4428-1_20 (accessed on 18 August 2021). [CrossRef]
  93. Vichiato, M.R.M.; Vichiato, M.; Pasqual, M.; Castro, D.M.; Dutra, L.F. Indução e Identificação de Tetraplóides Em Dendrobium nobile Lindl. (Orchidaceae). Rev. Ciência Agronômica 2007, 38, 385–390. Available online: http://www.ccarevista.ufc.br/seer/index.php/ccarevista/article/view/98 (accessed on 14 May 2021).
  94. Wimber, D.E.; Wimber, D.R. Floral Characteristics of Diploid and Neotetraploid Cymbidiuns. Am. Orchid. Soc. Bull. 1967, 38, 572–576. [Google Scholar]
  95. Xu, L.; Najeeb, U.; Naeem, M.S.; Daud, M.K.; Cao, J.S.; Gong, H.J.; Shen, W.Q.; Zhou, W.J. Induction of tetraploidy in Juncus effusus by colchicine. Biol. Plant. 2010, 54, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Silva, P.A.K.X.D.M.E.; Callegari-Jacques, S.; Bodanese-Zanettini, M.H. Induction and identification of polyploids in Cattleya intermedia Lindl. (orchidaceae) by in vitro techniques. Ciência Rural 2000, 30, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Menezes-Sá, T.S.A.; Arrigoni-Blank, M.D.F.; da Costa, A.S.; Santos-Serejo, J.D.A.; Blank, A.F.; Soares, C.A.; Moura, G.M.S. Chromosome doubling in Cattleya tigrina A. Rich. Sci. Plena 2019, 15, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Menninger, E.D. Diary of a Colchicine-Induced Tetraploid Cymbidium. Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. 1963, 32, 885–887. [Google Scholar]
  99. Wimber, D.E.; van Cott, A. Artificially Induced Polyploidy in Cymbidiums. In Proceedings of the 5th World Orchid Conference, Long Beach, CA, USA, 19–17 March 1966. [Google Scholar]
  100. Kim, M.S.; Won, J.Y.; Song, C.H.; Eun, J.S.; Lee, D.W. Polyploidy Induction of Cymbidium kanran by Treatment of Colchicine in Vitro. RDA J. Hortic. Sci. 1997, 39, 73–76. [Google Scholar]
  101. Hwang, S.-H.; Kim, M.-S.; Park, S.-Y. Improvement of Chromosome Doubling Efficiency in Cymbidium Hybrids by Colchicine and Oryzalin Treatment. Korean J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2015, 33, 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Yang, L.-J.; Gao, S.-P.; Zou, Z.-L.; Chen, G. Primary Studies on Polyploid Induction of Cymbidium Hybrid In Vitro. North. Hortic. 2009, 6, 915. [Google Scholar]
  103. Wang, M.; Zeng, R.; Xie, L.; Li, Y.; Zeng, F.; Zhang, Z. In Vitro Induction and Its Identification of Tetraploid Cymbidium hybridum. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2010, 30, 56–62. [Google Scholar]
  104. Xuejiao, L.; Zhilin, L.; Lipin, H. Induction and Identification of Polyploids in Wild Cymbidium lowianum. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2010, 13, 60. [Google Scholar]
  105. Ji, B.X.; Chen, D.W.; Zhang, C.C.; Min, D.; Huang, W.J.; Wang, Y. High Efficient Polyploid Induction of Cymbidium hybridum. Bull. Bot. Res. 2011, 31, 558–562. [Google Scholar]
  106. Mugui, W.; Ruizhen, Z.; Li, X.; Xuhua, G.; Zhisheng, Z. In Vitro Polyploid Induction and Its Identification in Cymbidium sinense. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2011, 27, 132–136. [Google Scholar]
  107. Song, L.; Yang, J.; Liu, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y. Polyploid Induction in Cymbidium sinense ‘Lv Mosu’ × Cymbidium hybridum Shijieheping F1 Generation. Guangxi Zhiwu Guihaia 2018, 38, 188–194. [Google Scholar]
  108. Grosso, V.; Farina, A.; Giorgi, D.; Nardi, L.; Diretto, G.; Lucretti, S. A high-throughput flow cytometry system for early screening of in vitro made polyploids in Dendrobium hybrids. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2017, 132, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yenchon, S.; Te-Chato, S. Polyploidy induction of Dendrobium formosum by colchicine treatment in vitro. Acta Hortic. 2014, 12, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, X.; Gao, J. In vitro tetraploid induction from multigenotype protocorms and tetraploid regeneration in Dendrobium officinale. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 141, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Tantasawat, P.; Khairum, A.; Chaowiset, W.; Wannajindaporn, A. Pronamide-induced polyploidy in rhynchostylis and dendrobium. Acta Hortic. 2012, 75, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kondo, H.; Phlaetita, W.; Mii, M.; Kikuchi, S.; Deguchi, A.; Miyoshi, K. Efficient Chromosome Doubling of an Interspecific Hybrid Dendrobium Stardust ‘Fire Bird’ by Treatment of Amiprofos-methyl to Protocorm-Like Body. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2020, 56, 738–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chaicharoen, S.; Saejew, K. Autopolyploidy in Dendrobium phalaenopsis. J. Sci. Soc. Thail. 1981, 7, 25–32. Available online: http://scienceasia.org/1981.07.n1/v07_025_032.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  114. Atichart, P.; Bunnag, S. Polyploid Induction in Dendrobium secundum (Bl.) Lindl. by in Vitro Techniques. Thail. J. Agric. Sci. 2007, 40, 91–95. Available online: https://www.thaiscience.info/journals/Article/TJAS/10469513.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  115. Sarathum, S.; Hegele, M.; Tantiviwat, S.; Nanakorn, M. Effect of Concentration and Duration of Colchicine Treatment on Polyploidy Induction in Dendrobium scabrilingue L. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2010, 75, 123–127. Available online: http://www.pubhort.org/ejhs/2010/file_1591098.pdf (accessed on 21 October 2021).
  116. Bunnag, S.; Hongthongkham, J. Polyploidy Induction of the Dendrobium Hybrid’Miss Singapore’through Tissue Culture. Acta Horticulturae. 2012, 953, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Atichart, P. Polyploid Induction by Colchicine Treatments and Plant Regeneration of Dendrobium chrysotoxum. Thai J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 46, 59–63. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Porntip_Atichart/publication/26555927_Agrobacterium-Mediated_Transformation_of_Dendrobium_secundum_Bl_Lindl_with_Antisense_ACC_Oxidase/links/0c96052436c218f654000000.pdf (accessed on 23 October 2021).
  118. Bunnag, S.; Hongthongkham, J. Polyploid induction of Dendrobium draconis rchb.f. Acta Hortic. 2015, 9, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zakizadeh, S.; Kaviani, B.; Hashemabadi, D. In vivo-induced polyploidy in Dendrobium ‘Sonia’ in a bubble bioreactor system using colchicine and oryzalin. Braz. J. Bot. 2020, 43, 921–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhang, X.; Gao, J. Colchicine-induced tetraploidy in Dendrobium cariniferum and its effect on plantlet morphology, anatomy and genome size. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 144, 409–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Griesbach, R.J. Polypioidy in Phalaenopsis orchid improvement. J. Hered. 1985, 76, 74–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Della Rahayu, E.M.; Sukma, D.; Syukur, M. Rawati Induksi Poliploidi Phalaenopsis amabilis (L.) Blume dan Phalaenopsis amboinensis JJ Smith dengan Kolkisin dalam Kultur In Vitro. J. Agron. Indones. 2016, 43, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Azmi, T.K.; Sukma, D.; Aziz, S.A.; Syukur, M. Polyploidy Induction of Moth Orchid (Phalaenopsis amabilis (L.) Blume) by Colchicine Treatment on Pollinated Flowers. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 11, 2. Available online: http://repo.lib.sab.ac.lk:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/1013/8118-28584-2-PB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 29 June 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Azmi, T.K.K.; Sukma, D.; Aziz, S.A.; Syukur, D.M. Morfologi dan Pertumbuhan Planlet Hasil Induksi Poliploidi melalui Perlakuan Kolkisin pada Kuncup Bunga Anggrek Bulan (Phalaenopsis amabilis (L.) Blume). J. Agron. Indones. 2016, 44, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Rahayu, E.M.D.; Sukma, D.; Syukur, M.; Aziz, S.A.; Irawati, D. In Vivo Polyploid Induction Using Colchicine of Moth Orchid Seedling (Phalaenopsis amabilis (L.) Blume). Buletin Kebun Raya 2015, 18, 41–48. Available online: https://publikasikr.lipi.go.id/index.php/buletin/article/view/31/31 (accessed on 13 June 2021).
  126. Cui, G. Tetraploid of Phalaenopsis Induction via Colchicine Treatment from Protocorm like Bodies in Liquid Culture. Agric. Life Sci. 2010, 36, 49. [Google Scholar]
  127. Wongprichachan, P.; Huang, K.-L.; Chou, Y.-M.; Hsu, S.-T.; Liu, T.-Y.; Okubo, H. Induction of Unreduced Gamete in Phalaenopsis by N2O Treatments. J. Fac. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 2013, 58, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Rungruchkanont, K.; Apisitwanich, S. Colchicine treatment: A method for genetic diversity induction of Doritis pulcherrima lindl. orchid of Thailand. Acta Hortic. 2015, 25, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zaker Tavallaie, F.; Kolahi, H. Induction of in Vitro Polyploidy in Ornamental Flowers of Orchid Species (Phalaenopsis amabilis). Iran. J. Rangel. Forests Plant Breed. Genet. Res. 2017, 25, 259–270. Available online: https://ijrfpbgr.areeo.ac.ir/article_113315_9ffa7b17d5edbc206df5e4be0d1d9ac1.pdf?lang=en (accessed on 13 October 2021).
  130. Unemoto, L.K.; De Faria, R.T.; Destro, D.; Barbosa, C.M.; Lone, A.B. Sobrevivência e diferenciação de protocormos de Oncidium flexuosum submetidos a tratamento com ácido peracético e colchicina. Acta Sci. Agron. 2009, 31, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Cui, G.R.; Zhang, Z.X.; Zhang, C.Y.; Hu, N.B.; Sui, Y.H.; Li, J.Q. Polyploid Induction and Identification of Oncidium. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 2010, 19, 184–190. [Google Scholar]
  132. Nakasone, H.Y. Artificial Induction of Polyploidy in Orchids by the Use of Colchicine. 1960. Available online: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/11486/uhm_phd_6004660_r.pdf (accessed on 13 September 2021).
  133. Tuwo, M.; Indrianto, A. Improvement of Orchid Vanda Hybrid (Vanda limbata Blume X Vanda tricolor Lindl. var. suavis) By Colchicines Treatment In Vitro. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2016, 10, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Kerdsuwan, N.; Te-chato, S. Effects of Colchicine on Survival Rate, Morphological, Physiological and Cytological Characters of Chang Daeng Orchid (Rhynchostylis gigantea var. rubrum sagarik) in vitro. J. Agric. Technol. 2012, 8, 1451–1460. Available online: http://ijat-aatsea.com/pdf/v8_n4_12_July/25_IJAT_2012_8_4__NattapornKerdsuwan-plantscience-accepted.pdf (accessed on 13 September 2021).
  135. Chung, M.Y.; Kim, C.Y.; Min, J.S.; Lee, D.-J.; Naing, A.H.; Chung, J.D.; Kim, C.K. In Vitro Induction of Tetraploids in an Interspecific Hybrid of Calanthe (Calanthe discolor × Calanthe sieboldii) through Colchicine and Oryzalin Treatments. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2014, 8, 251–257. Available online: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11816-014-0317-4.pdf (accessed on 14 June 2021). [CrossRef]
  136. Huy, N.P.; Tam, D.T.T.; Luan, V.Q.; Tung, H.T.; Hien, V.T.; Ngan, H.T.M.; Duy, P.N.; Nhut, D.T. In vitro polyploid induction of Paphiopedilum villosum using colchicine. Sci. Hortic 2019, 252, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Suhaila, A.S.; Norwati, M.; Yap, B.J.W.; Mahani, M.C.; Kandasamy, K.I.; Faridah, Q.Z.; Fadelah, A.A.; Hasnida, H.N.; Nazirah, A.; Haliza, I.; et al. The Potential of Paphiopedilum callosum Polyploids towards the Development of an Improved Native Malaysian Slipper Orchid. In Proceedings of the Conference on Forestry and Forest Products Research 2014, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, 8 May 2014; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nor-Fadilah-WOOK/publication/275884534_Production_of_high_quality_planting_materials_of_Eurycoma_longifolia_and_Labisia_pumila_in_FRIM_A_Mohd_Zaki_MA_Farah_Fazwa_N_Lokmal_S_Norhayati_SB_Syafiqah_Nabilah_W_Norfadilah/li (accessed on 16 June 2021).
  138. CDC. Colchicine: Biotoxine. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. 2011. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/emergencyresponsecard_29750016.html (accessed on 12 October 2021).
Figure 1. Workflow of the treatment of different types of explants with antimitotic agents aiming to obtain polyploid plants in orchids (left) and morphological differences between autopolyploid plants of hybrid Cattleya orchids induced by treatment with colchicine and confirmed by flow cytometry (A,B) and plants not induced (C,D).
Figure 1. Workflow of the treatment of different types of explants with antimitotic agents aiming to obtain polyploid plants in orchids (left) and morphological differences between autopolyploid plants of hybrid Cattleya orchids induced by treatment with colchicine and confirmed by flow cytometry (A,B) and plants not induced (C,D).
Plants 11 00469 g001
Table 2. Polyploidy induction of Cattleya using antimitotic agents.
Table 2. Polyploidy induction of Cattleya using antimitotic agents.
Species/
Cultivar
Type of ExplantTreatmentPolyploidy Assessment MethodPolyploidy EfficiencyAnatomical and Morphological Features of PolyploidsReferences
Cattleya intermedia Lind.PLBsColchicine 0.05% for 4 days for Clon 114
Colchicine 0.1% for 4 days for Clon 121
Chromosome count
Stomatal density
Clon 114
Mixoploides (42.0%)
Tetraploides (29.0%)
Clon 121
Mixoploides (33.0%)
Tetraploides (22.0%)
Higher stomatal densitySilva, Callegari-Jacques, and Bodanese-Zanettini [96]
Cattleya tigrina Lind.PlantletsColchicine 12.5 mM for 48-hFlow cytometry
Stomatal density
Stomatal functionality
Stomatal index
72.5% polyploidsGreater stomatal functionality, lower stomatal density, lower stomatal indexMenezes-Sá et al. [97]
PLBs: Protocorm-like bodies.
Table 3. Polyploidy induction of Cymbidium using antimitotic agents.
Table 3. Polyploidy induction of Cymbidium using antimitotic agents.
Species/CultivarType of ExplantTreatmentPolyploidy Assessment MethodPolyploidy EfficiencyAnatomical and Morphological Features of PolyploidsReferences
Cymbidium ‘Promised Land’PLBsOryzalin 14.4, 28.9 and 57.7_M---Miguel and Leonhardt [30]
Cym. hydridumPLBsColchicine 0.1% for 3 daysChromosome count
Morphological characterization
27.6% polyploidsShorter length and number of roots, larger root diameterXie et al. [43]
Hybrids: Cym. Showgirls “Sirly”
and Cym. Mystery Island “Silk Road”
PLBsColchicine 50 mg L−1 for 7 days
Oryzalin 5 mg L−1 for 2 weeks
Colchicine 50 mg L−1 for 7 days
Oryzalin 10 mg L−1 for 3 days
Flow cytometry
Morphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
Cymbidium Showgirls “Sirly” (60.0% with colchicine and 47.0% with oryzalin)
Cymbidium Mystery Island “Silk Road” (16.7% with colchicine and 6.7% with oryzalin)
Shorter and wider dark green leaves, less growth.
Greater length and width of guard cells, lower stomatal density.
Hwang, Kim, and Park [101]
Cym. Ruby Shower ‘Murasakin Okimi’ PLBsColchicine 300 mg L−1 for 15 daysChromosome count30.0% polyploids Yang et al. [102]
Cym. hybridumPLBsColchicine 0.05% for 5 daysMorphological characterization
Stomatal density
Anatomical characterization
23.7% polyploidsDarker, compact and resistant leavesWang et al. [103]
Cym. lowianumSeedlingsColchicine 0.04% for 72 hMorphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
60.0% polyploids Short stem, obscure leaves, greater width, less growth.
Larger size of stomata, smaller number of stomata
Xuejiao, Zhilin, and Lipin [104]
Cym. hybridumYoung shootsColchicine 0.05% por 24 hMorphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
28.2% polyploids Ji et al. [105]
Cym. sinense ‘QiJianBaiMo’ RhizomeColchicine 0.01% for 3 days 11.1% polyploidsHard leaves and thickened rootsMugui et al. [106]
Hybrid: Cym. sinenthese ‘Lv mosu’ × Cym. hybridum ‘Shijieheping’Protocorms Colchicine 0.03% for 72 hFlow cytometry
Morphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
36.0% polyploids Wider green leaves, thicker roots and less growth.
Greater length and width of guard cells, lower stomatal density.
Song et al. [107]
PLBs: Protocorm like-bodies.
Table 4. Polyploidy induction of Dendrobium using antimitotic agents.
Table 4. Polyploidy induction of Dendrobium using antimitotic agents.
SpeciesTypes of ExplantTreatmentPolyploidy Assessment MethodPolyploidy EfficiencyAnatomical and Morphological Features of PolyploidsReferences
Dendrobium‘Gatton Sun
Ray’
PLBsOryzalin 14.4 μM (5 mg L−1) for 6 daysAnatomical characterization Longer stomata lengthMiguel and Leonhardt [30]
Den. nobileSeedlingsColchicine 0.1% for 96 hChromosome count
Morphological characterization
29.2% polyploidsSmaller height, smaller diameter of pseudobulbs, smaller leaf length, larger leaf width.Vichiato et al. [93]
Den. phalaenopsis × Den. loddigesiiPLBsColchicine 0.05% (5 mg L−1) for 3 daysFlow cytometry Anatomical characterization80.0% polyploidsLonger stomata length, lower stomatal density.Grosso et al. [108]
Den. formosumPLBsColchicine 0.2% (20 mg L−1) for 48 hMorphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
Stomatal density
75.0% polyploidsLonger stem, thick green leaves—obscure.
Larger stomata size, lower stomatal density.
Yenchon and Te-chato [109]
Den. officinaleProtocormsOryzalin 14.4 μM (5 mg L−1) for 24 hFlow cytometry Chromosome count37.4% polyploidsSmaller height, smaller leaf length, smaller root length, larger stem and root diameter, larger lip and gynostemium width.Zhang and Gao [110]
Den.‘Burana Jade’ProtocormsPronamide 100 μM for 2 daysMorphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
33.3% polyploidsThickened leaves, shorter length, short and thickened stem.
Greater number of stomata.
Tantasawat et al. [111]
Den. stardust “Fire Bird”PLBsAmiprofosfo-metil (AMP) 160 mg for 12 Flow cytometry
Chromosome count
Morphological characterization
80.0% amphydiploidsLarger stem size and number of leaves.Kondo et al. [112]
Den. phalaenopsisProtocormsColchicine 0.05% for 9 daysChromosome count
Morphological characterization
50.0% polyploidsThick and dark green leaves, greater number of flowers/inflorescences.
Greater guard cell length, greater guard cell width.
Chaicharoen and Saejew [113]
Den. secundumProtocormsColchicine 0.05% for 1 dayFlow cytometry
Chlorophyll Content
Anatomical characterization
Greater thickness of roots, stem and leaves, greater flower size.
Greater length of guard cells.
Atichart and Bunnag [114]
Den. srabrilinguePLBsColchicine 0.075% (7.5 mg L−1) for 14 daysFlow cytometry43.1% polyploidsLarger diameter of stem and roots, dark green leaves.Sarathum et al. [115]
Den. “Miss Singapore”ProtocormsColchicine 0.01% (1 mg L−1) for 2 daysFlow cytometry
Chromosome count
Bunnag and Hongthongkham [116]
Den. chrysotoxumPLBsColchicine 0.04% (4 mg L−1) for 24 hFlow cytometry47.0% tetraploids Atichart [117]
Den. draconisProtocormsColchicine 0.05% (5 mg L−1) for 3 daysFlow cytometry
Morphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
43.0% polyploidsSmaller stem size; large, thick, dark green leaves.
Smaller guard cell number/area unit, larger guard cell size.
Bunnag and Hongthongkham [118]
Den. ‘Sonia’PLBsColchicine 0.15% (15 mg L−1) for 3 daysFlow cytometry
Chromosome count
Morphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
26.6% polyploidsGreater mass and smaller width of the bulb, greater length and width of leaves.
Longer stomata length.
Zakizadeh, Kaviani, and Hashemabadi [119]
Den. cariniferumProtocormsColchicine 0.05% (5 mg L−1) for 24 hFlow cytometry
Morphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
33.0% polyploidsGreater width and thickening of leaves, greater diameter of stem and root.
Greater length of stomata, lower stomatal density, greater number of chloroplasts, thickened spongy tissue, larger leaf veins, smaller cells of the adaxial epidermis and trichomes
Zhang and Gao [120]
PLBs: Protocorm-like bodies.
Table 5. Polyploidy induction of Phalaenopsis orchids.
Table 5. Polyploidy induction of Phalaenopsis orchids.
SpeciesType of ExplantTreatmentPolyploidy Assessment MethodPolyploidy EfficiencyAnatomical and Morphological Features of PolyploidsReferences
Phal. equestris, Phal. fasciata, Phal. Betty HausermannProtocorms Colchicine 50 mg L−1 for 10 daysChromosome count46.0% polyploids Griesbach [20]
Phal. bellinaProtocormsOryzalin 14.4 μM (5 mg L−1) for 3 daysAnatomical characterization Longer stomata lengthMiguel and Leonhardt [30]
Phal. amabilis var. grandifloraIn vitro plantlets from PLBs0.15% colchicine for 72 h under bubble bioreactorFlow cytometry, morphological and cytological measurements Reduction in plantlet length and number, and stomatal density; Increases in leaf number and width, guard cells and chloroplast number Mohammadi, Kaviani, and Sedaghathoor [41]
Phal. Goden Sands “Canary”ProtocormsColchicine 0.5 mg L−1 for 10 days 50.0% polyploidsMore obscure flowers, larger and larger in diameterGriesbach [121]
Phal. amabilis;
Phal. amboinensis
ProtocormsColchicine 50 mg L−1 for 10 daysChromosome count
Anatomical characterization
Stomatal density
33.3% polyploids of Phal. amabilis
40.0% polyploids of Phal. amboinensis
Thick dark green leaves.
Longer stomatal length, lower stomatal density
Rahayu et al. [122]
Phal. amabilisPollinated flowersColchicine 50 mg L−1 for 3 or 5 days
Colchicine 500 mg L−1 for 5 days
Morphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
60.0% polyploids
100.0% polyploids
Shorter leaf length, shorter length and larger diameter of roots, longer length and diameter of the basal organ of the protocorm.
Longer stomatal length
Azmi et al. [123]
Phal. amabilisBud flowersColchicine for 3 days at 50,
500 or 1000mg L−1
Morphological characterization71.2% polyploids *
86.7% polyploids *
100.0% polyploids *
Smaller root size, larger number of roots, larger root thickness, larger stem diameter, larger length of the basal organ of the protocorm.Azmi et al. [124]
Phal. amabilisSeedlingsColchicine 5000 mg/LMorphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
Stomatal density
50.0% polyploidsGreatest height
Greater length and width of stomata, lower stomatal density
Rahayu et al. [125]
PhalaenopsisPLBsColchicine
500, 1000 and 2000 mg L−1 for 1, 3 e 7 days
Cui G. [126]
Phal. amabilisPollen grainsNitrous oxide (N2O) for 24 h
Nitrous oxide (N2O) for 48 h
Chromosome count
Flow cytometry
Triploids (36.0%)
Tetraploids (7.0%)
Tetraploids (5.0%)
-Wongprichachan et al. [127]
Phal. pulcherrima (ex Doritis pulcherrima)ProtocormsColchicine 100 mg L−1 for 10 daysChromosome count
25.0% polyploids Rungruchkanont and Apisitwanich [128]
Phal. amabilisAuxiliary gems Colchicine 0.2% for 48 hChromosome count
Flow cytometry
Anatomical characterization
Morphological characterization
70.0% polyploidsIncrease in size and decrease in density of guard cellsZaker Tavallaie and Kolahi [129]
* Putative polyploids; PLBs: Protocorm-like bodies.
Table 6. Other genus of Orchidaceae with at last one study with an induction of polyploids.
Table 6. Other genus of Orchidaceae with at last one study with an induction of polyploids.
SpeciesExplantTreatmentPolyploidy Assessment MethodPolyploidy EfficiencyAnatomical and Morphological Features of PolyploidsReferences
Epidendrum‘Helen’s Pride’ProtocormsOryzalin 57.7 μM (20 mg L−1) for 6 daysAnatomical characterization2 polyploids Longer stomata lengthMiguel and Leonhard [30]
Odontioda
‘Emma Sander’
ProtocormsOryzalin 28.9 μM (10 mg L−1), 14,4 μM (5 mg L−1) or 57.7 μM (20 mg L−1) for 6 diasAnatomical characterization3 polyploids
2 polyploids
3 polyploids
Longer stomata lengthMiguel and Leonhardt [30]
Rynchostylis gigantea ‘K3.0124W’
Rynchostylis gigantea ‘K3.0131W’
Seeds Pronamide 200 μM for 4 daysChromosome count
Morphological characterization
Stomatal density
Anatomical characterization
Rynchostylis gigantea ‘K3.0124W’ (23.0%)
Rynchostylis gigantea ‘K3.0131W’ (35.0%)
Thick, rounded leaves. Anatomic: lower stomatal density, larger stomata size. Tantasawat et al. [104]
Vanda “Miss Joaquin” Young shootsColchicine 0.5% (50 mg L−1) and 1.5% (150 mg L−1) for 6 daysChromosome count
Anatomical characterization
Longer stomatal lengthNakasone [132]
Hybrid Vanda limbiata Blume X Vanda tricolor Lindl. var. suavisProtocormsColchicine 0.5% (50 mg L−1) for 6 hFlow cytometry
Chromosome count Morphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
Smaller number of roots, smaller root length, smaller number of leaves, smaller leaf width.
Anatomical: Larger stomatal size, smaller stomatal index.
Tuwo and Indrianto [133]
Rynchostylis gigantea var. rubrum sagarikPLBsColchicine 20 mg L−1 for 72 hChromosome count
Morphological characterization
Stomatal density
Number of chloroplasts
60.0% polyploidsSmaller size of seedlings and roots, larger number of leaves, smaller leaf size.
Higher stomatal density, lower number of chloroplasts
Kerdsuwan and Te-chato [134]
Hybrid Calanthe discolor X Calanthe sieboldiiSeedsColchicine 0.1% (10 mg L−1) for 7 days
Oryzalin 0.003% (0,3 mg L−1) for 1 days
Flow cytometry
Size of stomata
Stomatal density
81.0% polyploids
86.0% poliploids
Smaller size, thick dark green rounded leaves, larger leaf width, larger stem and root diameter.
Lower stomatal density, larger stomatal size
Chung et al. [135]
Paphiopedilum villosumSproutsColchicine 50 μM (20 mg L−1) for 6 daysFlow cytometry
Chromosome count
Anatomical Characterization
Stomatal density
19.9% polyploidsGreater leaf length, greater leaf width.
Longer guard cell length, lower stomatal density
Huy et al. [136]
Paphiopedilum callosumSeedsColchicine 1000 mg L−1 for 54 hChromosome count
Morphological characterization
Anatomical characterization
Larger seedling sizeSuhaila Siti et al. [137]
PLBs: Protocorm-like bodies.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vilcherrez-Atoche, J.A.; Iiyama, C.M.; Cardoso, J.C. Polyploidization in Orchids: From Cellular Changes to Breeding Applications. Plants 2022, 11, 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040469

AMA Style

Vilcherrez-Atoche JA, Iiyama CM, Cardoso JC. Polyploidization in Orchids: From Cellular Changes to Breeding Applications. Plants. 2022; 11(4):469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vilcherrez-Atoche, Joe Abdul, Carla Midori Iiyama, and Jean Carlos Cardoso. 2022. "Polyploidization in Orchids: From Cellular Changes to Breeding Applications" Plants 11, no. 4: 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11040469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop