Next Article in Journal
Research Progress on the Effect of Bacillus velezensis on Disease Resistance of Aquatic Animals
Previous Article in Journal
EpiSNPdb: A Comprehensive Database of Genetic Epistasis Across Multiple Cancer Types
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recombinant Expression and Activity Analysis of a Vibrio alginolyticus Phage-Derived Endolysin LysV039C

1
Engineering Research Center of the Modern Technology for Eel Industry of Education Ministry, Fisheries College of Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China
2
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Aquatic Genetic Breeding and Healthy Aquaculture, Guangxi Academy of Fishery Sciences, Nanning 530021, China
3
Zhejiang Provincial Modern Biology and Medicine Industry College, Hangzhou Normal University (Cangqian Campus), Hangzhou 311231, China
4
Key Laboratory of Eel Aquaculture and Processing of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350200, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48(8), 754; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48080754
Submission received: 14 June 2026 / Revised: 18 July 2026 / Accepted: 21 July 2026 / Published: 25 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry, Molecular and Cellular Biology)

Abstract

Pathogenic Vibrio species are a major cause of disease outbreaks in aquaculture, leading to substantial economic losses and posing risks to food safety. The increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance among these pathogens has created an urgent need for alternative antimicrobial strategies. Phage-derived endolysins, which specifically degrade bacterial peptidoglycan, have emerged as promising candidates to replace or supplement conventional antibiotics. In this study, we systematically characterized the endolysin LysV039C from the Vibrio alginolyticus phage phiV039C. Whole-genome analysis identified a 462 bp endolysin gene, which was cloned into the pET-28a vector, expressed in E. coli BL21, and purified. The lytic activity of the recombinant enzyme was evaluated using a turbidity reduction assay. LysV039C showed the strongest activity (58.9%) against host bacteria in the logarithmic phase, with peak activity (60.7–64.1%) achieved at 53 μg/mL, 35 °C, and neutral pH. The addition of 2.5 mM EDTA enhanced activity to 63.8%, whereas 10 mM divalent metal ions strongly inhibited the enzyme (<6.5%). Lytic spectrum analysis demonstrated that LysV039C exhibited a broader lytic spectrum against six Vibrio species than its parent phage phiV039C. Overall, LysV039C combines high environmental adaptability (alkaline tolerance, suitability for aquaculture temperature ranges) with efficient and broadened lytic activity against multiple Vibrio species. These findings provide a foundation for developing eco-friendly agents for the prevention and control of pathogenic Vibrio and offer a valuable reference for the mining of other phage-derived antibacterials against aquatic pathogens.

1. Introduction

Vibrio alginolyticus belongs to the family Vibrionaceae and the genus Vibrio. As a typical Gram-negative pathogen, it can not only cause fish diseases such as gill rot disease [1] and red leg disease [2] but also lead to human symptoms such as diarrhea and septicemia [3,4], posing a potential risk to public health and safety. Currently, the primary means of preventing and treating Vibrio infections still relies on antibiotics [5,6]. However, the growing prevalence of antibiotic resistance and environmental contamination stemming from the widespread use of antimicrobial agents has become increasingly concerning [7,8,9]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop sustainable antibiotic alternatives to conventional antimicrobial therapy. Bacteriophage endolysins are bacteriophage-encoded peptidoglycan hydrolases that selectively disrupt the cell wall of pathogenic bacteria through precise cleavage of peptidoglycan bonds [10], offering advantages such as high efficiency, low residue, and a low tendency to induce resistance [11]. Furthermore, their activity can be enhanced through engineering modifications [12]. Recent studies demonstrate that Vibrio-specific phage endolysins exert potent and selective antibacterial activity against key aquaculture pathogens, including Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio harveyi. Functionally, characterized endolysins fall into three major classes—muramidases, endopeptidases, and amidases—each defined by its distinct catalytic specificity: muramidases cleave the β-1,4-glycosidic bonds in the peptidoglycan glycan backbone; endopeptidases hydrolyze peptide bonds within the stem peptides or cross-links; and amidases sever the amide bonds linking the glycan backbone to the peptide moiety [13].
Compared with Gram-positive phage endolysins—several of which have advanced to commercialization [14]—the practical application of Gram-negative phage endolysins still faces considerable challenges. First, the penetration efficiency of most endolysins into Gram-negative bacteria is hindered by the outer membrane barrier, rendering these bacteria largely insensitive to external lysins [15]. Second, environmental fluctuations, such as variations in temperature, salinity, and metal ion concentrations in aquaculture settings, can compromise the enzymatic activity and stability of lysins [16]. Research indicates that the chelating agent EDTA enhances lysin penetration by disrupting the lipopolysaccharide layer [17], thereby providing potential for applications against Gram-negative bacteria. Although some studies on Vibrio lysins exist [18,19], systematic investigation of V. alginolyticus phage lysins remains limited, with a lack of comprehensive analysis regarding their environmental adaptability and broad-spectrum efficacy. Despite these advances, several critical knowledge gaps remain unaddressed, particularly regarding phage-derived endolysins against V. alginolyticus. First, although a few Vibrio lysins have been reported, systematic data on their environmental adaptability—specifically the combined effects of temperature, pH, and metal ions that fluctuate markedly in aquaculture systems—are scarce. Such data are prerequisites for transitioning from in vitro efficacy to in situ application. Second, the outer membrane (OM) of V. alginolyticus poses a distinct permeability barrier, yet the optimal permeabilizer (EDTA) concentration required to synergize with its cognate endolysin has not been empirically defined, and simply extrapolating concentrations from other Gram-negative pathogens may lead to under- or over-dosing. Third, while the host range of Vibrio phages is often reported, a direct, quantitative comparison between the lytic spectrum of the parental phage and that of its recombinant endolysin is lacking; such a comparison is essential to evaluate whether the endolysin offers functional advantages beyond phage predation. Fourth, the physiological state of the target bacterium (e.g., growth phase) profoundly affects cell wall crosslinking and susceptibility to hydrolases, but this factor has not been systematically integrated into the activity assessment of Vibrio endolysins, leaving a gap in rational dosing strategies.
To bridge these gaps, this study isolated a novel phage (phiV039C) against V. alginolyticus and focused on its endolysin LysV039C. Given that phages and their endolysins are often assumed to share equivalent host ranges, we directly compared the lytic spectra of the phage particle and its recombinant endolysin to determine whether this assumption holds in the context of V. alginolyticus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Reagents

The following strains were maintained in our laboratory: Vibrio alginolyticus phage phiV039C and its host strain V039C; Vibrio alginolyticus strains V208, TY05, and TY12; Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains TY10, TY18, VP11, Vp2, Vp3, and GH32; Vibrio vulnificus TY13; Vibrio tubiashii TY45; Aeromonas hydrophila A009 and A015; Bacillus amyloliquefaciens TY27; Streptococcus agalactiae SA503; and Staphylococcus aureus YY05. Additionally, strains Vibrio vulnificus H1 and G1, Edwardsiella B79, and Aeromonas hydrophila B11 were kindly provided by the research group of Professor Guo Songlin. Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) was purchased from Nanjing Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). LB broth and LB agar were obtained from Qingdao Hope Bio-technology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). Agarose was sourced from Biowest (Nuaillé, France). The plasmid pET-28a(+), restriction enzymes BamHI and XhoI, 15% precast electrophoresis gels, and True Color dual-color pre-stained protein marker were purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Kanamycin hydrochloride was procured from Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). HisPur™ Ni-NTA Spin Columns were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The BCA Protein Assay Kit was obtained from Abbkine Scientific Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China).

2.2. Sequence Analysis of Endolysin LysV039C

The whole genome of phage phiV039C was sequenced using the PacBio SMRT [20] platform (GenBank accession number MN922296.1). Genome analysis revealed that ORF6 exhibits potential lytic activity and was designated LysV039C. Subsequently, we used SnapGene (6.0.2) software to translate the nucleotide sequence of the lysin and analyze its physicochemical properties, including molecular weight, amino acid composition, and signal peptides. Protein sequences homologous to LysV039C were retrieved and downloaded from the NCBI database via the BLAST (WebBLAST). Sequence alignment was conducted with the ClustalW function in MEGA software (MEGA 11) [21], and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method [22]. Finally, the conserved domains of the lysin were predicted using the CD-Search tool on the NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 23 July 2026).

2.3. Heterologous Expression of Endolysin LysV039C

Primers LysV039C-F1 (5′-CGCGGATCCATGGACCCTAAATACATAAC-3′) and LysV039C-R1 (5′-CCGCTCGAGTCAATCATTGCCCCACT-3′) were designed based on the lysin gene of phiV039C, with a BamHI site at the 5′ end of F1 and an XhoI site at the 5′ end of R1. After PCR amplification, the products were analyzed for fragment size using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The restriction-digested PCR product was ligated with the plasmid pET-28a(+) using T4 DNA ligase [23], and the resulting construct was transformed into competent E. coli BL21 cells, yielding the recombinant expression strain BL21-pET-LysV039C.
BL21-pET-LysV039C was streaked onto LB solid medium and incubated at 37 °C for 12 h. Single colonies were selected from the plate and inoculated into 10 mL of LB broth containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin (Kana). The culture was shaken at 37 °C and 180 rpm for 12 h. Then, 1 mL of this culture was transferred to 100 mL of fresh LB broth containing 50 μg/mL Kana and incubated under the same conditions until the OD600 reached 0.60 ± 0.05. Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was then added to a final concentration of 1 mM, and induction continued at 37 °C, 180 rpm for 8 h. After induction, the culture was centrifuged at 4 °C and 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 10 mL of ice-cold PBS. This washing procedure was repeated three times. The resuspended cells were lysed by ice-bath ultrasonication (90 W, 1 s on/3 s off for 5 min). The lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant containing the lysin was collected. The expression pattern of the recombinant protein was assessed by SDS-PAGE.

2.4. Purification and Concentration Determination of Endolysin LysV039C

After cell disruption, the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22-μm membrane and gently loaded onto a Ni-NTA nickel-affinity column for purification of His-tagged recombinant protein [24]. Bound proteins were eluted sequentially with 6 mL of imidazole elution buffer at each of the following concentrations: 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 300 mmol/L. Following buffer exchange with an Amicon Ultra-15 10 kDa (Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China)centrifugal filter device, the purified LysV039C was supplemented with glycerol at a final concentration of 20% (v/v) as a cryoprotectant and subsequently stored at −80 °C. The purified LysV039C was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and the concentration of the recombinant protein was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Yakun Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China).

2.5. Determination of the Bacteriolytic Activity of Endolysin LysV039C

The bactericidal activity of recombinant endolysin LysV039C was evaluated using a turbidity reduction assay [25]. V. alginolyticus V039C was grown to the logarithmic phase, then harvested by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 4 °C, 2 min), and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was resuspended in PBS buffer (pH 7.4), and this washing procedure was repeated three times. The bacterial suspension was then adjusted to an OD600 of 2.0 ± 0.1. In a 96-well plate, 100 μL of the bacterial suspension was mixed with 100 μL of the ultrasonication supernatant from the recombinant strain BL21-pET-LysV039C. PBS (pH 7.4) served as the negative control, and commercial endolysin (final concentration 20,000 U/mg) was used as the positive control. Each treatment was performed in triplicate. After incubation with shaking at 30 °C for 2 h, the OD600 was measured using a microplate reader. The turbidity reduction rate (%) was calculated as follows:
( initial   OD 600 final   OD 600 ) / initial   OD 600

2.6. Optimal Conditions for Endolysin LysV039C Activity

2.6.1. Bactericidal Activity of Endolysin LysV039C Against Bacteria at Different Growth Phases

Cultures of V. alginolyticus V039C were harvested at 3 h (lag phase), 12 h (logarithmic phase), and 24 h (stationary phase). The cultures were centrifuged at 4 °C and 8000 rpm for 2 min and resuspended in PBS (pH 7.4) to an OD600 of 2.00 ± 0.10. In a 96-well plate, 100 μL of the bacterial suspension was combined with 100 μL of a solution containing LysV039C (final concentration 51 μg/mL) and EDTA (final concentration 0.5 mmol/L). PBS (pH 7.4) served as the negative control. During a 2 h incubation at 30 °C, the OD600 was measured every 10 min with a microplate reader.

2.6.2. Optimal Concentration of Endolysin LysV039C and Synergistic Effect with EDTA

A suspension of V. alginolyticus V039C was prepared by culturing to log phase (OD600 of 1.10 ± 0.05), centrifuging at 8000 rpm for 2 min at 4 °C, and resuspending in PBS (pH 7.4) to a final OD600 of 2.00 ± 0.10. In a 96-well plate, 100 μL of this suspension was mixed with 100 μL of a solution containing LysV039C (final concentrations: 0, 8.5, 17, 35, 51, 68, 85, and 102 μg/mL) and EDTA (final concentration 0.5 mmol/L). Separately, 100 μL of the same bacterial suspension was mixed with 100 μL of a solution containing LysV039C (51 μg/mL) and EDTA at varying final concentrations (0, 0.5, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10 mmol/L). PBS (pH 7.4) served as the blank control for all groups, with three replicates per condition. OD600 was measured after incubation.

2.7. Effects of Different Physicochemical Factors on Endolysin LysV039C

In a 96-well plate, 100 μL of the V. alginolyticus V039C suspension (cells harvested at logarithmic phase and resuspended to an OD600 of 2.0 ± 0.1) was mixed with LysV039C (final concentration 53 μg/mL) and EDTA (final concentration 0.5 mmol/L). Then, an equal volume of salt solution (i.e., 100 μL) was added to each well. The final concentrations of ZnCl2, CaCl2, MgCl2, MnCl2, and FeSO4 in the reaction system were each adjusted to 0.1, 1, and 10 mmol/L (separately).
A 3 mL aliquot of the V. alginolyticus V039C suspension (cells harvested at logarithmic phase and resuspended to an OD600 of 2.0 ± 0.1) was mixed with LysV039C (final concentration 51 μg/mL) and EDTA (final concentration 0.5 mmol/L) in a 10 mL centrifuge tube. The mixture was incubated at temperatures ranging from 10 to 45 °C for 2 h, after which the OD600 was measured.
V. alginolyticus V039C (OD600 = 1.10 ± 0.05) was harvested by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 2 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in PBS (pH 7.4); this washing step was repeated three times. For the final resuspension, the cell pellet was resuspended in equal volumes of PBS adjusted to pH 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10, yielding bacterial suspensions with an OD600 of 2.0 ± 0.1. In a 96-well plate, 100 μL of each pH-adjusted suspension was mixed with LysV039C (final concentration 51 μg/mL) and EDTA (final concentration 0.5 mmol/L). After incubation at 30 °C for 2 h, OD600 was measured. Parallel controls containing PBS (at matching pH values) instead of endolysin were included. The turbidity reduction rate was calculated as (1). All conditions were tested in triplicate.

2.8. Lysis Spectrum Detection of Endolysin LysV039C and Phage phiV039C

Using the method described in Section 2.5, host bacterial cultures were processed to obtain resuspended cells with an OD600 of 2.00 ± 0.10 [26]. In a 96-well plate, 100 μL of bacterial suspension was sequentially added to 100 μL of a mixture containing endolysin LysV039C (final concentration 51 μg/mL) and EDTA (final concentration 0.5 mmol/L). After incubation at 30 °C for 2 h, the OD600 value was measured using a microplate reader.

3. Results

3.1. Sequence Analysis and Prediction of Endolysin LysV039C

The endolysin gene LysV039C (GenBank accession number QJD54561.1) from phage phiV039C was translated into an amino acid sequence using SnapGene for physicochemical analysis. The gene sequence comprises 462 bp, encoding a protein of 153 amino acids with a theoretical molecular weight of approximately 17.3 kDa. Bioinformatic analysis predicted that LysV039C lacks a signal peptide sequence. LysV039C showed high sequence overlap with a fragment of a Vibrio phage NF gene (Figure 1). It also clustered on the same phylogenetic branch as this NF gene. These results are consistent with the whole-genome comparison and indicate a close phylogenetic relationship between phages phiV039C and NF. CD-search prediction revealed that endolysin LysV039C contains an endolysin domain (PHA00447) spanning amino acids 4–148, a peptidoglycan-binding domain (PGRP, cd06583) spanning amino acids 2–121 (Table 1), and all other predicted domains are associated with amidase activity. All of these domains are catalytic domains characteristic of lysins, and no independent, non-catalytic cell-wall binding domains (such as SH3b or LysM) were detected, except for the PGRP domain which also possesses amidase activity.

3.2. Cloning, Expression, Purification, and Activity Determination of Endolysin LysV039C

PCR amplification was performed using the phage phiV039C genome as a template with primers LysV039C-F1 and LysV039C-R1. Gel electrophoresis analysis of the PCR product revealed a band of approximately 500 bp, consistent with the expected size of 462 bp (Figure 2). The target fragment was double-digested and then ligated into the pET-28a(+) plasmid. The recombinant plasmid was then transformed into E. coli BL21 competent cells. After sequence verification, large-scale soluble expression of LysV039C was induced with IPTG. Following ultrasonication and disruption of the cells, LysV039C was recovered in the supernatant. The purified protein showed a band at ~18 kDa by SDS-PAGE, aligning with the theoretical molecular weight (Figure 3). The concentration of recombinant LysV039C, quantified by the BCA assay, was 159 μg/mL.
Bacterial concentration is directly proportional to the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) [27]. Intact bacterial cells have a high OD600, while endolysis causes a decrease. V. alginolyticus V039C was treated with the ultrasonication supernatant from the recombinant expression strain. The resulting turbidity reduction rate was 44.8% (Figure 4). In the PBS negative control, turbidity reduction was minimal (<5%), confirming the bactericidal activity of the recombinant supernatant.

3.3. Optimal Conditions for Endolysin LysV039C Activity

Endolysin LysV039C demonstrated distinct lytic effects on host bacteria across different growth stages (Figure 5a). The lytic activity against bacteria in the lag phase and stationary phase was 42.4% and 10.3%, respectively. For bacteria in the logarithmic growth phase, the lytic activity of recombinant LysV039C reached 58.9%, while the lag and stationary phases suppressed enzyme activity. At a concentration of 42 μg/mL, endolysin LysV039C showed a lytic activity of 52.5%. When the concentration was increased to 53 μg/mL, lytic activity reached 60.7%. However, when the concentration was further increased to 106 μg/mL, the bactericidal activity increased by only 9.5 percentage points, indicating that 53 μg/mL is the optimal bactericidal concentration for recombinant endolysin LysV039C (Figure 5b). With the synergistic action of 2.5 mM EDTA, the lytic activity of recombinant LysV039C increased significantly from 24.2% to 63.8% (Figure 5c). EDTA alone had no bactericidal effect but markedly enhanced the lytic activity of the lysin, as confirmed by negative controls. Figure 5d illustrates the effects of divalent metal ions on the lytic activity of recombinant LysV039C. At concentrations of 0.1 mM and 1 mM, Zn2+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and Ca2+ slightly enhanced the lytic activity. However, at 10 mM, the activity decreased to below 6.5%, indicating that high concentrations of divalent metal ions significantly inhibited lysin function. Evaluation of thermal stability (Figure 5e) revealed that lytic activity remained below 25% at temperatures between 10 and 20 °C. As the temperature increased to 35 °C, the lytic activity peaked at 61.5%. This is consistent with the optimal range for mesophilic enzymes and is suitable for most aquaculture environments. The influence of pH on lytic activity is presented in Figure 5f. With increasing pH, activity initially rose and then declined, reaching a maximum of 64.1% at pH 7. Even at pH 10, activity remained above 30%, indicating an optimal pH of 7 and demonstrating tolerance to alkaline conditions.
In summary, the lytic activity of endolysin LysV039C was significantly influenced by the host bacterial growth phase, enzyme concentration, synergy with EDTA, and environmental factors (temperature, pH, and divalent metal ions). Optimal activity was observed under the following conditions: logarithmic growth phase bacteria (58.9% lysis), lysin concentration of 53 μg/mL (60.7% lysis), temperature of 35 °C (61.5% lysis), pH 7 (64.1% lysis), and 2.5 mM EDTA (63.8% lysis). Notably, high concentrations (10 mM) of divalent metal ions strongly inhibited enzyme activity.

3.4. Lysis Spectrum of Endolysin LysV039C and Phage phiV039C

Endolysin LysV039C exhibited a broad lysis spectrum against Gram-negative bacteria beyond its host strain V. alginolyticus V039C, including V. alginolyticus V208 (56.1%), V. vulnificus H1 (70.4%), V. parahaemolyticus VP11 (17.1%), V. parahaemolyticus GH32 (60.4%), V. vulnificus TY13 (39.7%), and V. harveyi G1 (65.0%) (Figure 6). In contrast, lytic activity against Gram-positive bacteria—S. aureus YY05 (2.1%), S. agalactiae SA503 (1.9%), and B. amyloliquefaciens TY27 (5.6%)—was negligible. A spot assay confirmed that the parent phage phiV039C lysed only its host V039C, indicating that the recombinant lysin has a broader lytic spectrum than its parental phage. Among all 15 tested strains, the parent phage phiV039C, as confirmed by spot assay, produced clear plaques exclusively on its original host V039C. In contrast, recombinant LysV039C exhibited detectable lytic activity against 6 out of 6 Vibrio species tested, including non-host species such as V. vulnificus and V. harveyi, representing a relative expansion in spectrum coverage compared with its parental phage. Notably, the endolysin showed negligible activity against Gram-positive species, confirming its specificity for Gram-negative peptidoglycan architecture.

4. Discussion

A recombinant E. coli BL21(DE3) strain was established to efficiently express the phage-derived endolysin LysV039C. The LysV039C gene was cloned into a prokaryotic expression vector. The resulting recombinant plasmid was then transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) competent cells to achieve heterologous expression. Sequence analysis revealed high sequence similarity with the lysin from Vibrio phage NF and confirmed the presence of an endolysin catalytic domain and a PGRP domain, which functions as a bifunctional module with both peptidoglycan recognition and amidase activity. This domain architecture is consistent with the functional characteristics of amidase-class lysins [28]. Compared with other Vibrio phage endolysins such as LysVPB [29], which possesses a putative calcium-binding site, LysV039C features a more compact PGRP-based design that integrates binding and catalytic functions within a single domain. The recombinant endolysin LysV039C accumulated predominantly in soluble form within the cytoplasm, minimizing inclusion body formation [30]. Following purification by nickel affinity chromatography, a high-purity LysV039C protein was obtained at a concentration of 159 μg/mL.
Endolysins naturally rely on cognate holins to permeabilize the cytoplasmic membrane and access periplasmic peptidoglycan during phage infection [31,32,33]. A subset of lysins can also achieve membrane translocation via N-terminal signal peptides independent of holins [34,35]. Bioinformatic analysis confirmed that LysV039C lacks a canonical N-terminal signal peptide, and our heterologous expression system did not co-express its native holin. This explains why recombinant LysV039C accumulated in the E. coli cytoplasm without triggering bacterial autolysis, consistent with the typical behavior of Gram-negative phage endolysins in prokaryotic expression systems.
As a macromolecular peptidoglycan hydrolase, exogenous LysV039C cannot freely penetrate the Gram-negative outer membrane barrier [36], which accounts for its moderate baseline lytic activity (24.2%) against intact V. alginolyticus cells. The chelating agent EDTA disrupts outer membrane stability by sequestering structural divalent cations (Mg2+, Ca2+) [37], and we found that supplementation with 2.5 mM EDTA enhanced LysV039C activity by 1.6-fold, reaching a lysis rate of 63.8%. Notably, the optimal EDTA concentration for LysV039C is slightly higher than the 0.5–1 mM typically reported for endolysins targeting other Gram-negative pathogens, such as Lys66 against Proteus vulgaris [38] and LysTAC1 against Acinetobacter baumannii [39]. This discrepancy likely reflects species-specific differences in lipopolysaccharide composition and outer membrane rigidity of V. alginolyticus, suggesting that permeabilizer optimization should be carefully evaluated when designing endolysin-based applications for specific aquaculture pathogens.
The lytic activity of phage lysins is strongly influenced by the physiological state of host bacteria, with the growth phase being a key determinant. This study demonstrated that the antibacterial efficacy of recombinant endolysin LysV039C was closely associated with bacterial growth stage. Maximum lytic activity against the host strain V. alginolyticus V039C was observed during the logarithmic growth phase, whereas activity decreased significantly against stationary-phase cells. Specifically, LysV039C exhibited lytic activity against logarithmic-phase bacteria that was 1.95 times higher than that against stationary-phase organisms. This growth-phase-dependent activity pattern is shared by other lysins, such as phage lysin AB54, which also showed superior activity against logarithmic-phase Acinetobacter baumannii [40]. The underlying mechanism involves substantial differences in cell wall structure, composition, and metabolic activity across growth phases [41]. Targeting pathogens during their most vulnerable growth stage may therefore optimize lysin-mediated bactericidal outcomes.
Recombinant endolysin LysV039C demonstrated favorable adaptability to temperature and pH. It showed optimum activity at 35 °C and pH 7.0, while maintaining relatively high activity at 25–37 °C and pH 7.0–9.0, conditions compatible with most marine and freshwater aquaculture environments. This temperature/pH profile is comparable to that of LysVpKK5 (optimal at 30 °C) [42], yet LysV039C retains >30% activity even at pH 10, whereas LysVpKK5 shows no activity at pH ≤ 7. In contrast, LysV039C maintains >30% activity at pH 10 while also retaining robust activity across pH 6–9. This difference in pH profiles suggests that marine vibrio phage endolysins may vary considerably in their pH preference. Within the concentration range of 0.1 to 1.0 mM, divalent metal ions moderately enhanced LysV039C lytic activity. In contrast, high concentrations (10 mM) strongly inhibited activity (<6.5% remaining), a phenomenon also reported for endolysin PlyD4 [43] and peptidoglycan hydrolase M15A [44]. This inhibition may be attributed to metal ion-induced conformational changes in the enzyme or to competitive binding with the substrate. This highlights the importance of regulating metal ion concentrations in practical applications. When considered alongside the metal ion inhibition profiles and EDTA synergy concentrations determined here, these data provide an initial reference for predicting how LysV039C might behave under the fluctuating physicochemical conditions typical of aquaculture systems—parameters that cannot be deduced from sequence analysis or phage host-range data alone.
Recombinant lysin LysV039C exhibited efficient lytic activity not only against its original host V. alginolyticus but also against various other Gram-negative pathogens, including V. vulnificus, V. harveyi, and E. coli. This cross-species lytic activity suggests a potential advantage in scenarios involving mixed infections, although this remains to be validated in complex biological systems such as host-associated microbiota or infected tissues. Although the antibacterial spectrum of LysV039C is limited and influenced by variations in outer membrane structure across bacterial species, it is markedly broader than that of its parent phage. A similar phenomenon has been documented for LysVPp1, whose lytic spectrum against Vibrio species was also broader than that of its parent phage CH20 [45]. While the limited number of reported cases precludes a definitive conclusion that this phenomenon is universal among Vibrio phages, the parallel observations in LysV039C and LysVPp1 suggest that the functional divergence between a phage particle and its encoded endolysin may be a recurring theme in at least some Vibrio phage systems. This underscores the importance of characterizing endolysins directly, as their host range cannot be reliably inferred from that of the parent phage.
However, this experiment still has certain stability issues. First, all lytic activity data were obtained in vitro using PBS-buffered bacterial suspensions; we have not tested LysV039C in live fish or shrimp challenge models, so its therapeutic efficacy, dosing regimen, and clearance in aquaculture animals remain unknown. Second, our assays used planktonic cells exclusively; biofilm eradication was not examined, and given that vibrios readily form biofilms on tank surfaces and fish mucus, this represents a major knowledge gap. Third, the antibacterial activity was evaluated solely by the turbidity reduction assay, which measures the decrease in optical density as an indirect indicator of cell lysis. This method is inherently semi-quantitative and can be confounded by cell aggregation, changes in cell morphology, or residual debris, and it does not directly measure viable cell counts. A more rigorous log-reduction assay (CFU/mL enumeration) is needed to accurately determine the bactericidal efficacy and killing kinetics of LysV039C. Fourth, our optimization of reaction conditions (Figure 5b–f) was performed solely with logarithmic-phase cells; stationary-phase cells, which are likely predominant in infected hosts, were not tested, so the optimal parameters for physiologically relevant bacterial populations remain to be established.
In summary, by targeting conserved structural motifs in the peptidoglycan layer, this recombinant lysin achieves effective cross-species lysis—offering a promising basis for developing novel antimicrobial agents against Gram-negative pathogens.

5. Conclusions

This study reveals that the biochemical properties and environmental adaptability of the phage-derived endolysin LysV039C, rather than its parent phage host range, define its potential for controlling multiple Vibrio species, with a lytic spectrum significantly broader than that of its parent phage. Despite being isolated from a single Vibrio alginolyticus phage with narrow host specificity, the recombinant endolysin exhibited potent lytic activity across six Vibrio species, demonstrating a markedly wider lytic spectrum than its parent phage phiV039C. Regarding the enzyme’s functional properties, the chelating agent EDTA exerted a critical synergistic role in disrupting the outer membrane barrier of Gram-negative bacteria, while divalent metal ions at aquaculture-relevant concentrations strongly inhibited enzymatic activity. These findings highlight the buffering and sensitizing capacity of outer membrane permeabilizers in overcoming the intrinsic resistance of Gram-negative pathogens to exogenous lysins. The optimal activity of LysV039C at 25~37 °C and neutral to alkaline pH, conditions compatible with most aquaculture environments, suggests that under well-managed application protocols, this endolysin could serve as an effective eco-friendly antimicrobial agent. However, its practical application as an eco-friendly antimicrobial agent will require further evaluation in live animal models, biofilm environments, and with direct bacterial enumeration methods. The stark contrast between the narrow host range of phage phiV039C and the broad lytic spectrum of its recombinant endolysin LysV039C provides fundamental evidence for understanding the functional divergence between phage particles and their encoded lytic enzymes, particularly in the context of developing novel biocontrol strategies against pathogenic Vibrio in aquaculture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.L.; Methodology, J.Z.; Software, Z.L. and H.C.; Formal analysis, Y.Y. (Yiyuan Yu); Investigation, Y.Y. (Yingying Ye); Resources, H.T. and Q.W.; Writing—original draft preparation, Y.Y. (Yiyuan Yu) and Y.Y. (Yingying Ye); Writing—review and editing, H.T., M.X., J.Z., Q.W. and M.L.; Supervision, H.C., G.T. and M.X.; Project administration, G.T. and M.L.; Funding acquisition, M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No.2025YFD2400300), Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (No. 2026GXNSFBA00640361), Fujian Natural Science Foundation (No.2023J01143), and Fund of Engineering Research Center of the Modern Technology for Eel Industry, Education Ministry of China (No. RE202407).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to all co-authors for their dedicated efforts and collaborative contributions throughout the entire research process. We also appreciate the support provided by the Engineering Research Center of the Modern Technology for Eel Industry of the Education Ministry, Fisheries College of Jimei University, and the Guangxi Key Laboratory of Aquatic Genetic Breeding and Healthy Aquaculture for the smooth completion of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kalatzis, P.G.; Bastías, R.; Kokkari, C.; Katharios, P. Isolation and Characterization of Two Lytic Bacteriophages, φSt2 and φGrn1; Phage Therapy Application for Biological Control of Vibrio alginolyticus in Aquaculture Live Feeds. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Sudheesh, P.S.; Xu, H.S. Pathogenicity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Tiger Prawn Penaeus monodon Fabricius: Possible Role of Extracellular Proteases. Aquaculture 2001, 196, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Ina-Salwany, M.Y.; Al-saari, N.; Mohamad, A.; Mursidi, F.A.; Mohd-Aris, A.; Amal, M.N.A.; Kasai, H.; Mino, S.; Sawabe, T.; Zamri-Saad, M. Vibriosis in Fish: A Review on Disease Development and Prevention. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 2019, 31, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Vinuesa-Velasco, V.; Beteta-López, A.; Ezcurra-Hernández, P. Chronic Simple Otitis Media Due to Vibrio alginolyticus. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2022, 40, 582–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Miranda, C.D.; Godoy, F.A.; Lee, M.R. Current Status of the Use of Antibiotics and the Chilean Salmon Farms. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Naylor, R.L.; Goldburg, R.J.; Primavera, J.H.; Kautsky, N.; Beveridge, M.C.M.; Clay, J.; Folke, C.; Lubchenco, J.; Mooney, H.; Troell, M. Effect of Aquaculture on World Fish Supplies. Nature 2000, 405, 1017–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  7. Le, T.X.; Munekage, Y. Residues of Selected Antibiotics in Water and Mud from Shrimp Ponds in Mangrove Areas in Viet Nam. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 49, 922–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  8. Cabello, F.C. Heavy Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Aquaculture: A Growing Problem for Human and Animal Health and for the Environment. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1137–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Guo, Y.; Zeng, C.; Ma, C.; Cai, H.; Jiang, X.; Zhai, S.; Xu, X.; Lin, M. Comparative Genomics Analysis of the Multidrug-Resistant Aeromonas hydrophila MX16A Providing Insights into Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1042350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Rahman, M.U.; Wang, W.; Sun, Q.; Shah, J.A.; Li, C.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Chen, W.; Wang, S. Endolysin, a Promising Solution against Antimicrobial Resistance. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Fischetti, V.A. Using Phage Lytic Enzymes to Control Pathogenic Bacteria. BMC Oral Health 2006, 6, S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Mao, J.; Schmelcher, M.; Harty, W.J.; Foster-Frey, J.; Donovan, D.M. Chimeric Ply187 Endolysin Kills Staphylococcus aureus More Effectively than the Parental Enzyme. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013, 342, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Li, M.; Li, M.; Lin, H.; Wang, J.; Jin, Y.; Han, F. Characterization of the Novel T4-like Salmonella enterica Bacteriophage STP4-a and Its Endolysin. Arch. Virol. 2016, 161, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Brady, A.; Felipe-Ruiz, A.; Gallego del Sol, F.; Marina, A.; Quiles-Puchalt, N.; Penadés, J.R. Molecular Basis of Lysis-Lysogeny Decisions in Gram-Positive Phages. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 75, 563–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Dicks, L.M.; Vermeulen, W. Bacteriophage–Host Interactions and the Therapeutic Potential of Bacteriophages. Viruses 2024, 16, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Ding, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. An Endolysin LysSE24 by Bacteriophage LPSE1 Confers Specific Bactericidal Activity against Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella Strains. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  17. Peng, H.; Wang, N.; Wang, M.; Yang, C.; Guo, W.; Li, G.; Huang, S.; Wei, D.; Liu, D. Comparison of Activity and Safety of DSPAα1 and Its N-Glycosylation Mutants. Life 2023, 13, 985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Zhu, X.; Li, X.; Shi, H.; Zhou, J.; Tan, Z.; Yuan, M.; Yao, P.; Liu, X. Characterization of a Novel Alginate Lyase from Marine Bacterium Vibrio furnissii H1. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  19. Li, S.; Wang, L.; Hao, J.; Xing, M.; Sun, J.; Sun, M. Purification and Characterization of a New Alginate Lyase from Marine Bacterium Vibrio sp. SY08. Mar. Drugs 2016, 15, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. Korlach, J.; Bjornson, K.P.; Chaudhary, B.P.; Cicero, R.L.; Flusberg, B.A.; Gray, J.J.; Holden, D.; Saxena, R.; Wegener, J.; Turner, S.W. Chapter 20—Real-Time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Methods Enzym. 2010, 472, 431–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Suleski, M.; Sanderford, M.; Sharma, S.; Tamura, K. MEGA12: Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis Version 12 for Adaptive and Green Computing. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2024, 41, msae263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Studier, F.W.; Rosenberg, A.H.; Dunn, J.J.; Dubendorff, J.W. Use of T7 RNA Polymerase to Direct Expression of Cloned Genes. Methods Enzym. 1990, 185, 60–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Hochuli, E.; Döbeli, H.; Schacher, A. New Metal Chelate Adsorbent Selective for Proteins and Peptides Containing Neighbouring Histidine Residues. J. Chromatogr. A 1987, 411, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Park, J.; Yun, J.; Lim, J.A.; Kang, D.H.; Ryu, S. Characterization of an Endolysin, LysBPS13, from a Bacillus cereus bacteriophage. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 332, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Schmelcher, M.; Donovan, D.M.; Loessner, M.J. Bacteriophage Endolysins as Novel Antimicrobials. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 1147–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  27. Mager, J.; Kuczynski, M.; Schatzberg, G.; Avi-Dor, Y. Turbidity Changes in Bacterial Suspensions in Relation to Osmotic Pressure. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1956, 14, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Fischetti, V.A. Lysin Therapy for Staphylococcus aureus and other bacterial pathogens. In Staphylococcus aureus: Microbiology, Pathology, Immunology, Therapy and Prophylaxis; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 409, pp. 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  29. Chen, J.; Zhao, Z.; Mu, X.; Wang, M.; Tang, J.; Bi, Q. Characterization of a Marine Endolysin LysVPB against Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Protein Expr. Purif. 2025, 226, 106608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  30. Villaverde, A.; Carrió, M.M. Protein Aggregation in Recombinant Bacteria: Biological Role of Inclusion Bodies. Biotechnol. Lett. 2003, 25, 1385–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  31. Gondil, V.S.; Harjai, K.; Chhibber, S. Endolysins as Emerging Alternative Therapeutic Agent to Counter Drug Resistant Infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Young, R. Bacteriophage Lysis: Mechanism and Regulation. Microbiol. Rev. 1992, 56, 430–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Ullah, I.; Cui, S.; Yan, Q.; Ullah, H.; Sha, S.; Ma, Y. In Vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of Recombinant Phage-Derived Endolysin LysTAC1 Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, I.N.; Smith, D.L.; Young, R. Holins: The Protein Clocks of Bacteriophage Infections. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2000, 54, 799–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Nakonieczna, A.; Rutyna, P.; Fedorowicz, M.; Kwiatek, M.; Mizak, L.; Łobocka, M. Three Novel Bacteriophages, J5a, F16Ba, and z1a, Specific for Bacillus anthracis, Define a New Clade of Historical Wbeta Phage Relatives. Viruses 2022, 14, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Loessner, M.J.; Wendlinger, G.; Scherer, S. Heterogeneous Endolysins in Listeria monocytogenes Bacteriophages: A New Class of Enzymes and Evidence for Conserved Holin Genes within the Siphoviral Lysis Cassettes. Mol. Microbiol. 1995, 16, 1231–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Beveridge, T.J. Structures of Gram-Negative Cell Walls and Their Derived Membrane Vesicles. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 4725–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  38. Impey, R.E.; Hawkins, D.A.; Sutton, J.M.; Soares Da Costa, T.P. Overcoming Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance Mechanisms Associated with the Cell Wall of Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  39. Jiang, Y.; Xu, D.; Wang, L.; Qu, M.; Li, F.; Tan, Z.; Yao, L. Characterization of a Broad-Spectrum Endolysin LysSP1 Encoded by a Salmonella Bacteriophage. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 5461–5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  40. Khan, F.M.; Gondil, V.S.; Li, C.; Jiang, M.; Li, J.; Yu, J.; Wei, H.; Yang, H. A Novel Acinetobacter baumannii Bacteriophage Endolysin LysAB54 with High Antibacterial Activity Against Multiple Gram-Negative Microbes. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 637313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Pritchard, D.G.; Dong, S.; Baker, J.R.; Engler, J.A. The Bifunctional Peptidoglycan Lysin of Streptococcus agalactiae Bacteriophage B30. Microbiology 2004, 150, 2079–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. Melo-López, F.N.; Zermeño-Cervantes, L.A.; Barraza, A.; Loera-Muro, A.; Cardona-Félix, C.S. Biochemical characterization of LysVpKK5 endolysin from a marine vibriophage. Protein Expr. Purif. 2021, 188, 105971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, C.; Shi, S.; Wei, M.; Dong, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, R. Characterization of a Novel Broad-Spectrum Endolysin PlyD4 Encoded by a Highly Conserved Prophage Found in Aeromonas hydrophila ST251 Strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 699–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Khakhum, N.; Yordpratum, U.; Boonmee, A.; Tattawasart, U.; Rodrigues, J.L.M.; Sermswan, R.W. Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of a Peptidoglycan Hydrolase from the Burkholderia pseudomallei Phage ST79. AMB Express 2016, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Li, M.; Jin, Y.; Lin, H.; Wang, J.; Jiang, X. Complete Genome of a Novel Lytic Vibrio parahaemolyticus Phage VPp1 and Characterization of Its Endolysin for Antibacterial Activities. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of phage based on LysV039C.
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of phage based on LysV039C.
Cimb 48 00754 g001
Figure 2. The PCR amplification products of LysV039C. Figure legend—Lane M: DNA marker. Lane 1, 2: LysV039C.
Figure 2. The PCR amplification products of LysV039C. Figure legend—Lane M: DNA marker. Lane 1, 2: LysV039C.
Cimb 48 00754 g002
Figure 3. The expression of LysV039C in BL21-pET-LysV039C. Figure legend—Lane M: Protein marker. Lane 1: BL21-pET28a(+). Lane 2: Unpurified supernatant. Lanes 3, 4: First and second eluates from the nickel column. Lane 5: The total cell protein of BL21-pET28a(+).
Figure 3. The expression of LysV039C in BL21-pET-LysV039C. Figure legend—Lane M: Protein marker. Lane 1: BL21-pET28a(+). Lane 2: Unpurified supernatant. Lanes 3, 4: First and second eluates from the nickel column. Lane 5: The total cell protein of BL21-pET28a(+).
Cimb 48 00754 g003
Figure 4. Bactericidal activity of the supernatants of BL21-PET-Lys against host bacteria. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Bactericidal activity of the supernatants of BL21-PET-Lys against host bacteria. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Cimb 48 00754 g004
Figure 5. Factors affecting the bacteriolytic activity of the recombinant endolysin LysV039C. (a): Different growth phases of the host, lag phase (OD600 < 0.17), log phase (OD600 0.17–1.10), and stationary phase (OD600 > 1.10). (b): Final concentration of LysV039C. (c): Final concentration of EDTA. (d): Final concentration of metal ions. (e): Temperature. (f): pH.
Figure 5. Factors affecting the bacteriolytic activity of the recombinant endolysin LysV039C. (a): Different growth phases of the host, lag phase (OD600 < 0.17), log phase (OD600 0.17–1.10), and stationary phase (OD600 > 1.10). (b): Final concentration of LysV039C. (c): Final concentration of EDTA. (d): Final concentration of metal ions. (e): Temperature. (f): pH.
Cimb 48 00754 g005
Figure 6. The bacteriolytic activity of the recombinant endolysin LysV039C against different bacteria. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. The bacteriolytic activity of the recombinant endolysin LysV039C against different bacteria. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Cimb 48 00754 g006
Table 1. Conserved domain prediction for endolysin LysV039C.
Table 1. Conserved domain prediction for endolysin LysV039C.
NameAccessionDescriptionIntervalE-Value
PHA00447PHA00447Lysozyme4–1481.67 × 10−44
PGRPcd06583Peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs) are pattern recognition receptors that bind.3–1211.02 × 10−23
Ami_2smart00644Ami_2 domain2–1195.63 × 10−14
AmpDCOG3023N-acetyl-anhydromuramyl-L-alanine amidase AmpD1–1211.02 × 10−9
Amidase_2pfam01510N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase2–1192.05 × 10−8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, Y.; Ye, Y.; Cai, H.; Li, Z.; Zheng, J.; Tong, G.; Xu, M.; Weng, Q.; Tan, H.; Lin, M. Recombinant Expression and Activity Analysis of a Vibrio alginolyticus Phage-Derived Endolysin LysV039C. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2026, 48, 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48080754

AMA Style

Yu Y, Ye Y, Cai H, Li Z, Zheng J, Tong G, Xu M, Weng Q, Tan H, Lin M. Recombinant Expression and Activity Analysis of a Vibrio alginolyticus Phage-Derived Endolysin LysV039C. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2026; 48(8):754. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48080754

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Yiyuan, Yingying Ye, Hongjiao Cai, Zhongqin Li, Jiang Zheng, Guixiang Tong, Mingfeng Xu, Qibiao Weng, Honglian Tan, and Mao Lin. 2026. "Recombinant Expression and Activity Analysis of a Vibrio alginolyticus Phage-Derived Endolysin LysV039C" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 48, no. 8: 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48080754

APA Style

Yu, Y., Ye, Y., Cai, H., Li, Z., Zheng, J., Tong, G., Xu, M., Weng, Q., Tan, H., & Lin, M. (2026). Recombinant Expression and Activity Analysis of a Vibrio alginolyticus Phage-Derived Endolysin LysV039C. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 48(8), 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48080754

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop