Next Article in Journal
Chelerythrine Inhibits TGF-β-Induced Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in A549 Cells via RRM2
Previous Article in Journal
From Management to Cure: The Shifting Paradigm in HIV and Chronic Viral Hepatitis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Antidiabetic Activity of Wild-Growing and Cultivated Medicinal Plants Used in Romania for Diabetes Mellitus Management: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review

by
Diana Maria Trasca
1,†,
Dalia Dop
2,†,
George-Alin Stoica
3,*,
Niculescu Stefan Adrian
4,
Niculescu Elena Carmen
2,
Renata Maria Văruț
5,* and
Cristina Elena Singer
2
1
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
2
Department of Mother and Baby, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
3
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
4
Department of Orthopedics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
5
Research Methodology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(7), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18071035
Submission received: 30 May 2025 / Revised: 1 July 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 11 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products)

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disease that has a significant impact on public health and is becoming more and more common worldwide. Although effective, conventional therapies are often limited by high cost, adverse effects, and issues with patient compliance. As a result, there is growing interest in complementary and alternative therapies. Medicinal plants have played an essential role in diabetes treatment, especially in regions such as Romania, where biodiversity is high and traditional knowledge is well preserved. The pathophysiology, risk factors, and worldwide burden of diabetes are examined in this review, with an emphasis on the traditional use of medicinal plants for glycemic control. A total of 47 plant species were identified based on ethnopharmacological records and recent biomedical research, including both native flora and widely cultivated species. The bioactive compounds identified, such as flavonoids, triterpenic saponins, polyphenols, and alkaloids, have hypoglycemic effects through diverse mechanisms, including β-cell regeneration, insulin-mimetic action, inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase, and oxidative stress reduction. A systematic literature search was conducted, including in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies relevant to antidiabetic activity. Among the species reviewed, Urtica dioica, Silybum marianum, and Momordica charantia exhibited the most promising antidiabetic activity based on both preclinical and clinical evidence. Despite promising preclinical results, clinical evidence remains limited, and variability in phytochemical content poses challenges to reproducibility. This review highlights the potential of Romanian medicinal flora as a source of adjunctive therapies in diabetes care and underscores the need for standardization and clinical validation.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) ranks among the top global health burdens, trailing only cardiovascular and oncological diseases in severity and frequency. Its prevalence has soared, affecting about 6.6% of the global population, and healthcare systems allocate over 10% of resources to its management [1,2]. From 2000 to 2011, cases doubled from 171 million to 347 million, with projections exceeding 550 million by 2030 [3].
In Romania, type 1 DM incidence sits near 5 per 100,000 annually, while many more live in a prediabetic state that, without lifestyle and dietary intervention, will progress to overt diabetes [4]. The World Health Organization divides DM into type 1, type 2, other specific forms, and gestational diabetes, with type 1 and type 2 being the most prevalent. This spectrum, from normoglycemia through insulin dependence, aids accurate staging and guides therapy. Type 1 diabetes is characterized by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells, resulting in absolute insulin deficiency, while type 2 diabetes is marked by insulin resistance and a relative insulin deficiency due to impaired β-cell function. Insulin resistance refers to reduced sensitivity of peripheral tissues to the effects of insulin, leading to compensatory hyperinsulinemia and eventual glucose intolerance. One key mechanism targeted by both synthetic and natural therapies is α-glucosidase inhibition, which slows the intestinal breakdown of carbohydrates, thereby reducing postprandial blood glucose spikes. Etiologically, DM may be primary (idiopathic) or secondary to identifiable conditions such as chronic pancreatitis, hormonal disorders (e.g., Cushing disease), certain medications or toxins, and genetic syndromes [5,6].
Type 1 DM stems from an autoimmune attack; T lymphocytes destroy pancreatic β-cells, leading to rapid-onset symptoms: polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, weight loss, and fatigue. Without prompt insulin therapy, patients risk ketoacidosis and coma [5]. Both genetic factors (diabetogenic HLA haplotypes) and environmental triggers (viral infections, mumps, Coxsackie B4, rubella, CMV, EBV, and early dietary exposures like cow milk proteins, nitrosamines, and caffeine) contribute to disease onset [7].
Type 2 DM evolves insidiously from insulin resistance and impaired secretion. It often goes undetected for years. Key risk factors include sedentary lifestyle, excessive caloric intake, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity. In obesity, enlarged adipocytes and infiltrating immune cells release pro-inflammatory adipokines, worsening insulin resistance and promoting endothelial dysfunction [8,9].
Persistent hyperglycemia fosters oxidative stress—an imbalance favoring reactive oxygen species (ROS) over antioxidants (glutathione, catalase, and superoxide dismutase), damaging cells and driving complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy, atherosclerosis, and heightened risks of myocardial infarction and stroke [10]. Consequently, diabetic individuals face markedly increased cardiovascular, renal, and ocular morbidity. Neither a cure nor fully substitutive insulin exists. Management centers on staged interventions: lifestyle modification (low glycemic index, diet, and exercise), phytotherapy, oral antidiabetics, and insulin injections [11].
This review focuses on medicinal plants that are either native to Romania or widely used in Romanian ethnomedicine, including both indigenous wild flora and cultivated or imported species with documented antidiabetic properties. Romania possesses a unique cultural and ethnobotanical heritage, with centuries-old traditions of using medicinal plants for managing chronic diseases such as diabetes. Rural and urban communities alike have preserved knowledge regarding the preparation and therapeutic use of indigenous and introduced species, making Romania a particularly rich resource for the study of plant-based antidiabetic interventions.
Phytotherapy, used since antiquity, employs plant-based preparations (infusions, decoctions, and tinctures) rich in bioactive compounds. Its benefits include the synergistic effects of phytocomplexes and a favorable side-effect profile [12]. Research has linked hypoglycemic activity to constituents such as polyphenolic acids, anthocyanosides, carotenoids, essential oils, triterpenes, tannins, and flavonoids. The mechanisms include β-cell regeneration, insulin-mimetic action, reduction in intestinal glucose uptake, suppression of gluconeogenesis, enhancement in peripheral glucose utilization, and improvement in insulin sensitivity [13].
Animal studies, often using streptozotocin or alloxan to induce diabetes, have clarified these mechanisms and supported the traditional use of many plants for reducing hyperglycemia and oxidative stress [14].

2. Pathogenesis of Diabetes Mellitus

Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) arises when autoimmune Th1-polarized CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (and macrophages) attack pancreatic β-cells in the islets of Langerhans, often despite normal B-cell function. This breakdown in self-tolerance is linked to defective thymic deletion of high-affinity T cells and MHC gene variants. β-cell loss occurs via direct CD8+ cytotoxicity, cytokines (IL-1, IFN-γ, TNF-α), ROS, nitric oxide, or Fas/FasL interactions [15].
Three autoantibodies, ICA-512, anti-GAD65, and insulin autoantibodies (IAA), appear years before symptoms. A single autoantibody carries a ~20% risk of clinical T1DM; two or more raise the risk to above 75% [16]. Familial risk hinges on HLA class II alleles: DRB103/04 and DQB10302 confer ~25% risk, doubling to ~50% if multiple relatives are affected [17,18,19]. Intriguingly, some carriers of the “protective” DQA1-DQB1*0602 haplotype still develop T1DM—suggesting delayed onset rather than absolute protection—and the precise pathogenic role of autoantibodies remains uncertain [20]. Early in T1DM, insulin sensitivity is preserved, but endogenous secretion plummets by diagnosis (low C-peptide), necessitating lifelong insulin replacement to avert ketoacidosis and other acute crises [21,22].
Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) reflects peripheral insulin resistance, driven by altered receptor signaling and eventual β-cell exhaustion, and a modest genetic predisposition (e.g., TCF7L2 variants increase risk ~1.5-fold) [23]. Contributing metabolic derangements include heightened adipocyte lipolysis, incretin resistance, hyperglucagonemia, fluid retention, and dysregulated central metabolic control.
Obesity is a pivotal, modifiable driver of T2DM. Hypertrophic white adipose tissue becomes inflamed; macrophage infiltration and excess TNF-α and IL-6 disrupt insulin signaling, while leptin overproduction further stimulates macrophages [24]. Conversely, adiponectin, normally abundant in adipose tissue and protective via the suppression of hepatic gluconeogenesis, the promotion of muscle fatty acid oxidation, and anti-inflammatory effects, is markedly reduced in obesity and diabetes, exacerbating insulin resistance and atherogenesis [25,26].

3. Causes and Risk Factors

The causes of diabetes mellitus remain only partially understood. The development of both major types of diabetes is closely associated with hereditary factors, particularly family history involving first-degree relatives (parents or siblings) diagnosed with the condition. Researchers have identified at least 18 genetic loci, designated IDDM1 through IDDM18, that are correlated with T1DM. The IDDM1 region includes the HLA genes, which regulate immune responses and encode proteins of the major histocompatibility complex. In addition to genetic background, phenotypic expression plays a significant role.
Currently, extensive genetic studies aim to define specific genetic profiles that predispose individuals to T2DM in various regions around the world. T2DM is considered a polygenic disorder, involving multiple genes located on different chromosomes that contribute to disease susceptibility. The analysis of genetic contributions is complicated by the fact that numerous environmental factors interact with these genes to trigger disease onset. Only a minority of T2DM cases are attributable to single-gene defects, one notable example being maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). Our current understanding of the genetic basis of T2DM remains limited. Reflecting the complex network of physiological disturbances in T2DM, its genetic architecture involves a large number of susceptibility genes, each exerting a relatively small effect (Table 1).
Several studies suggest that vitamin D deficiency during childhood increases the risk of later developing T1DM. In Finland, a northern country with limited sunlight exposure and reduced cutaneous vitamin D synthesis, the incidence of T1DM is the highest in the world. Other research has identified early cow milk consumption as another predisposing factor for autoimmune diabetes. Bovine serum albumin can trigger the production of autoantibodies that, through molecular mimicry, target pancreatic β-cells.
Gluten and other cereal-derived proteins have also been implicated as potential antigens; introducing cereals into an infant’s diet before the age of 3 months may increase the risk of developing T1DM.
Additional contributors include metabolic stress and exposure to environmental toxins, both of which may predispose individuals to the development of T1DM [30].
For T2DM, the most significant modifiable risk factors include excessive body weight, primarily due to overeating and physical inactivity [31]. Another potentially important diabetogenic factor is psychological stress, especially crowding-related stress in urban environments.
Race and ethnicity have also been linked to an increased risk of T2DM. African Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders have a higher incidence of type 2 diabetes compared to Caucasian populations.
While advancing age is a well-known risk factor for T2DM, the number of children being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes is also on the rise. These children are often obese, sedentary, and have a positive family history of the disease [32].
Women with a history of gestational diabetes or those who have given birth to a macrosomic infant (weighing over 4 kg) are at increased risk of developing prediabetes or overt T2DM. Moreover, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) has been identified as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus [33,34].

4. Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus

Diabetes mellitus is a leading chronic condition of modern society, yet estimating its true global prevalence remains challenging due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria [35]. Since the 1990s, DM rates have climbed sharply: from 366 million cases in 2011 to a projected 552 million by 2030—a 51% rise over 19 years [36]. Global reports cover all forms (type 1, type 2, gestational, and insulin-dependent/non-dependent) and complications such as retinopathy across regions [37].
Despite advances in care, life expectancy for people with DM lags behind that of the general population, primarily due to cardiovascular disease, renal failure, and infections. Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) makes up 5–10% of cases and, although it can emerge at any age, is most common in childhood and adolescence. The WHO’s DIAMOND study (children ≤14 years, year 2000) found incidence under 1 per 100,000/year in China and South America, yet over 20 per 100,000/year in Northern Europe (peaking at 36.5 in Finland), with intermediate rates in France and Italy (~8) and half of Europeans between 5 and 10 per 100,000/year. Incidence is rising in societies undergoing rapid change [38].
Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is increasingly diagnosed in youths; school-age rates climb ~3% annually, and preschool rates ~5%. Overall, cases are set to surge in developing nations due to population growth, aging, poor diet, obesity, and inactivity. By 2030, most DM patients in wealthy countries will be ≥65, whereas those in low- and middle-income countries will predominantly be 45–64 years old. T2DM prevalence is the highest in Pacific Islands, moderate in India and the U.S., and lower in Russia; about 2–6% of Western European and North American populations are affected [39,40,41].
Urbanization, sedentary lifestyles, stress, and excess weight have doubled DM diagnoses over three decades. Projections once estimated >360 million global cases by 2030 [42]. Central (“android”) obesity, present in ~80% of T2DM patients, is a critical risk factor; waist-to-hip ratio correlates with diabetes incidence since Vague’s 1956 findings [43,44]. As of 2022, WHO reports that 43% of adults are overweight and 16% are obese worldwide, with ~35 million obese children under five in 2024 [45].
In Romania, adult DM prevalence exceeds 8%, totaling over one million people [46]. In 2011, nearly 800,000 Romanians had DM (67% urban), 14.5% were insulin-dependent, and 2651 juvenile cases were recorded (61% urban), with an age distribution of 3% (0–14 yrs), 62% (15–64 yrs), and 35% (>64 yrs). Recent estimates indicate that 1.7 million Romanians have DM and 3 million have prediabetes and are at high risk without preventive action [6,47].
By 2010, type 2 DM accounted for 90 % of the 285 million global diabetes cases, about 6% of adults—predominantly in developed nations [48,49].

5. Classification of Diabetes Mellitus

The etiological classification of diabetes mellitus, based on associated metabolic disturbances, allows for the differentiation of several distinct types: type 1, type 2, type 3 (resulting from specific mechanisms or underlying diseases), and type 4 (gestational diabetes) (Table 2).
Type 1 diabetes mellitus is characterized by destructive lesions of pancreatic β-cells, arising either through autoimmune mechanisms or from unknown causes [50].
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is defined by the coexistence of two pathophysiological features: diminished insulin secretion and reduced sensitivity of target tissues to insulin, commonly referred to as insulin resistance (Figure 1) [51].
Obesity, defined by a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30, along with metabolic syndrome, represents a significant risk factor that increases the incidence and precedes the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus [52]. Type 3 diabetes includes two subcategories: diabetes resulting from specific genetic mutations and diabetes associated with pathological states or other diseases [53]. Gestational diabetes is defined as an impairment in glucose metabolism (glucose intolerance) that is first diagnosed during pregnancy. In certain cases, this condition may reflect previously undiagnosed preexisting diabetes, in which case it is not classified as gestational diabetes. Gestational diabetes complicates approximately 3–10% of pregnancies. Women diagnosed with gestational diabetes require long-term postnatal monitoring, often for years, due to the increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes later in life. Careful glycemic control during pregnancy is crucial, as it supports normal fetal development and significantly reduces the risk of congenital malformations and perinatal mortality [54]. Based on plasma glucose levels and glucose metabolism status, individuals may be categorized as having normal glycemia, prediabetes, or overt diabetes mellitus. The diabetic stage can be further subdivided into three clinical substages: diabetes that does not require insulin, diabetes that requires insulin for glycemic control, and diabetes that requires insulin for survival. These substages may vary depending on the progression or improvement of metabolic processes, whether wild-growing or in response to appropriate therapeutic intervention (Table 3) [55].
The classification and diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus were first developed in 1979 and 1980 by the National Diabetes Data Group (USA) and the Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus of the World Health Organization. In parallel, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) issued a report to reassess the criteria for diagnosing and classifying diabetes. The terminology was clarified, and the proposed classification system has since been widely accepted in the medical and scientific literature [49]. The etiologic classification of diabetes, initially proposed by the ADA in 1997 and endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1999–2000, has undergone several refinements, with the most recent updates incorporated in the ADA Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024 and the WHO 2022 classification, which remain the internationally recognized frameworks for clinical and research purposes.
Table 2. Etiologic classification of disorders of glucose metabolism.
Table 2. Etiologic classification of disorders of glucose metabolism.
I. Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (β-cell destruction, usually resulting in absolute insulin deficiency)
A. Autoimmune—The autoimmune process is marked by the presence of specific autoantibodies, including islet cell antibodies, insulin autoantibodies, anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GAD65), and antibodies against tyrosine phosphatases IA-2 and IA-2β.
B. Idiopathic—The mechanisms responsible for β-cell destruction are unknown. Patients exhibit permanent insulinopenia and are prone to ketoacidosis, without any evidence of autoimmune involvement.
This form of diabetes is more commonly observed in individuals of African or Asian descent [56].
II. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. This form may range from predominant insulin resistance with a relative insulin deficiency to a predominant insulin secretory defect accompanied by insulin resistance [57]
III. Other Specific Types of Diabetes Mellitus
A. Genetic defects of β-cell function (MODY—Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young):
  • Chromosome 12, HNF-1α (MODY 3)
  • Chromosome 7, glucokinase (MODY 2)
  • Chromosome 20, HNF-4α (MODY 1)
  • Chromosome 13, IPF-1 (MODY 4)
  • Chromosome 17, HNF-1β (MODY 5)
  • Chromosome 2, NeuroD1 (MODY 6)
  • Mitochondrial DNA mutations
  • Subunits of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel
B. Genetic defects in insulin action:
Type A insulin resistance, leprechaunism, Rabson–Mendenhall syndrome, lipoatrophic diabetes
C. Diseases of the exocrine pancreas:
Pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, neoplasia, cystic fibrosis, hemochromatosis, fibrocalculous pancreatopathy
D. Endocrinopathies:
Acromegaly, Cushing syndrome, glucagonoma, pheochromocytoma, hyperthyroidism, somatostatinoma, aldosteronoma
E. Drug- or chemical-induced diabetes:
Vacor (a rodenticide), intravenous pentamidine (irreversibly destroys pancreatic β-cells), nicotinic acid, glucocorticoids, thyroid hormones, diazoxide, β-adrenergic agonists, thiazides, phenytoin (Dilantin), α-interferon
F. Infections:
Congenital rubella, cytomegalovirus
G. Uncommon forms of immune-mediated diabetes:
Stiff-man syndrome, insulin receptor autoantibodies
H. Other genetic syndromes associated with diabetes:
Down syndrome, Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, Wolfram syndrome, Friedreich ataxia, Huntington chorea, Laurence–Moon–Biedl syndrome, myotonic dystrophy, porphyria, Prader–Willi syndrome [58]
IV. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Carbohydrate intolerance of variable severity with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. In some cases, this may reflect previously undiagnosed pre-existing diabetes rather than true gestational diabetes. Women diagnosed with GDM require long-term follow-up after delivery [59]
V. Prediabetes
This category refers to blood glucose abnormalities that are less severe than overt diabetes, but still associated with increased risk of progression and cardiovascular complications.
A. Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG): Fasting plasma glucose levels between 110 and 125 mg/dL.
B. Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT): Two-hour plasma glucose levels during an oral glucose tolerance test between 140 and 199 mg/dL.
Individuals with IFG and/or IGT are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, and their cardiovascular risk is elevated—comparable to that of individuals with overt diabetes [60]
Table 3. Categories of increased risk for diabetes (prediabetes) based on blood glucose and HbA1c values [61]. For all three tests, the risk is continuous, extending below the lower limit of the interval and becoming disproportionately high at the extreme values.
Table 3. Categories of increased risk for diabetes (prediabetes) based on blood glucose and HbA1c values [61]. For all three tests, the risk is continuous, extending below the lower limit of the interval and becoming disproportionately high at the extreme values.
Tests UsedReference Ranges for PrediabetesInterpretation
FPG (fasting plasma glucose)—no carbohydrate intake 8 h prior100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L) to 125 mg/dL (6.9 mmol/L)Impaired fasting glucose
Two-hour plasma glucose after 75 g oral glucose (OGTT—oral glucose tolerance test)140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) to 199 mg/dL (11.0 mmol/L)Impaired glucose tolerance
HbA1C5.7–6.4%Prediabetes

6. Traditionally Used Herbal Products in the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications

Key Representatives and Mechanisms of Action

Medicinal plants exert their antidiabetic effects through a wide range of physiological mechanisms that mirror or complement those of conventional pharmacological agents. One of the key pathways involves the regeneration and stimulation of pancreatic β-cells, ultimately leading to increased insulin production and secretion. These secretagogue-like actions are particularly valuable in early-stage diabetes, where residual β-cell function can still be preserved or enhanced. In addition to stimulating endogenous insulin secretion, many phytochemicals also display insulin-like (insulinomimetic) effects. These compounds can directly activate insulin receptors, acting as functional agonists that mimic the hormone activity and further stimulate β-cell responsiveness. Such dual mechanisms contribute not only to improved insulin levels but also to more effective glucose clearance from circulation. Another important therapeutic pathway is the reduction in intestinal glucose absorption, achieved through the inhibition of carbohydrate-digesting enzymes such as α-glucosidase and α-amylase. By slowing the breakdown of complex carbohydrates, these plant-derived compounds help attenuate postprandial glycemic spikes. Similarly, the inhibition of renal glucose reabsorption contributes to enhanced glycemic control by promoting glucose excretion via the urine, an effect functionally analogous to that of SGLT2 inhibitors. On a systemic level, phytocompounds may also exert influence over hepatic glucose metabolism through the suppression of gluconeogenesis and the modulation of glycogen storage and breakdown. This effect, in concert with enhanced glucose uptake in peripheral tissues, particularly skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, supports a more balanced glycemic profile. Additionally, plant constituents have been shown to improve insulin sensitivity, a cornerstone in the management of type 2 diabetes, particularly in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Some compounds facilitate the reactivation of protein-bound insulin, restoring its biological activity and extending its physiological utility. Finally, certain plant-based molecules contribute to glycemic regulation by inhibiting insulinase, the enzyme responsible for insulin degradation, thereby prolonging insulin half-life and bioavailability in circulation. Taken together, these multifaceted actions highlight the therapeutic potential of medicinal plants as complementary agents in diabetes management, acting not only on isolated targets but across multiple interconnected metabolic pathways (Figure 2) [62].
In conjunction with synthetic antidiabetic medications, phytotherapy serves as an effective adjunct therapy in conventional hypoglycemic treatment protocols. Medicinal plants have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in diabetes management, with scientific studies highlighting numerous bioactive compounds that offer protective and regenerative effects on insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells [63].
The main classes of plant-derived hypoglycemic compounds include polyphenolcarboxylic acids, anthocyanosides, carotenoids, essential oils, triterpenes, thioheterosides, tannins, sterols, triterpenic saponins, proanthocyanidins, bitter principles, flavonoids, and coumarins [64,65] (Table 4).
The following table provides a comprehensive overview of the 47 medicinal plants included in this review, grouped according to the experimental models and durations most commonly used in antidiabetic research. Plants were categorized based on whether they were evaluated in cell culture assays (typically 24–48 h, assessing glucose uptake, GLUT4 translocation, or insulin secretion), rapid in vitro enzyme inhibition assays (30–60 min, targeting α-glucosidase or α-amylase activity), in vivo animal studies (ranging from 2 to 8 weeks, examining effects on glycemic control, pancreatic β-cell function, or diabetes complications), or human clinical trials (weeks to months). Notably, while many plants have demonstrated promising enzyme inhibitory effects in rapid biochemical assays, only a subset has been systematically investigated in cell-based or in vivo models that better reflect physiological glucose metabolism. Furthermore, relatively few plants have been evaluated in clinical studies, underlining the need for translational research to substantiate their therapeutic potential (Table 5).
Wild-growing plants, such as Thymus vulgaris, Salvia officinalis, and Urtica dioica, represent native flora that grows naturally in Romanian ecosystems without the need for human intervention. These species not only reflect the rich ethnobotanical heritage of the region but also offer a sustainable source of bioactive compounds for therapeutic use. Cultivated but non-wild-growing plants, including Glycyrrhiza glabra, Trigonella foenum-graecum, and Asparagus officinalis, are not native to the Romanian landscape but are widely grown due to their recognized medicinal or nutritional properties. Their inclusion in local agriculture illustrates the integration of global phytomedicine into regional practices, driven by both traditional knowledge and modern phytopharmaceutical demand. Lastly, the neither wild-growing nor commonly cultivated group, which includes tropical and subtropical species such as Momordica charantia, Panax quinquefolius, and Azadirachta indica, are primarily of exotic origin and are not typically found in Romanian agriculture or wild flora. These plants, however, hold significant pharmacological promise and are increasingly studied for their antidiabetic potential in global research, suggesting opportunities for future cultivation under controlled conditions or use in standardized extracts (Table 6).
Among Romania’s rich wild-growing flora, Urtica dioica (stinging nettle) stands out as a widely accessible, traditionally used plant with robust preclinical evidence for glycemic benefits. Both animal and in vitro studies confirm its ability to enhance glucose uptake, mimic insulin activity, and reduce oxidative stress, with an α-glucosidase IC50 of 44.7 μg/mL for methanolic leaf extract. Nettle can be consumed as an infusion, soup, or cooked vegetable, representing a natural and sustainable dietary intervention for blood glucose management. Its widespread availability and favorable safety profile further support its role as a practical resource for diabetes prevention in Romanian communities.
Emerging evidence consistently supports the adoption of a dietary pattern rich in whole plant foods, unprocessed grains, legumes, vegetables, nuts, and moderate fruit intake as the optimal strategy for diabetes prevention and metabolic health. In Romania, adapting the traditional diet to emphasize fiber-rich foods (whole grains, beans, lentils, and leafy greens), unsaturated fats (from nuts and seeds), and moderate dairy and fish intake, while reducing refined carbohydrates, sugary drinks, and processed meats, can substantially lower the risk of developing diabetes. Such a dietary pattern aligns with both Mediterranean and Nordic dietary recommendations and is feasible using locally available ingredients. Additionally, integrating infusions or culinary use of select medicinal plants with documented antidiabetic activity, such as Urtica dioica (stinging nettle), Salvia officinalis (sage), and Cynara scolymus (artichoke), offers a culturally acceptable and accessible adjunct for glycemic control. Public health efforts should focus on education, seasonal plant-based diversity, and support for rural foraging and small-scale cultivation, thus leveraging Romania’s botanical heritage for metabolic health.
Table 7 synthesizes current knowledge by categorizing all 47 medicinal plants reviewed in this article according to their principal molecular targets and antidiabetic pathways, as supported by recent pharmacological research. Each plant is mapped to at least one major mechanism, including AMPK activation, PPAR-γ modulation, PI3K/Akt-mediated GLUT4 translocation, inhibition of digestive enzymes (α-glucosidase and α-amylase), insulin receptor agonism, DPP-IV and SGLT inhibition, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity, β-cell protection, or other relevant metabolic effects. Notably, several plants possess multi-target actions, reflecting the polypharmacological potential of botanical therapies for diabetes management [66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155].

7. Materials and Methods

This review was carried out as a narrative survey with systematic search elements, guided by key PRISMA recommendations. The search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for publications between January 2000 and June 2025, using broad and specific search strings such as “diabetes”, “hypoglycemic plants”, “Romania”, “phytotherapy”, “antidiabetic activity”, “in vitro”, “in vivo”, and “clinical trial”. We limited inclusion to peer-reviewed, full-text articles in English or Romanian that investigated wild or cultivated medicinal plants traditionally used in Romania for glycemic control and provided phytochemical analyses (e.g., flavonoid, alkaloid, or terpenoid profiling) and/or pharmacological assessments (enzyme assays, cell-based glucose uptake studies, animal models, or human trials). Non-original reports, abstracts, commentaries, and studies lacking clear phytochemical or efficacy data were excluded. Priority was given to controlled in vivo experiments and clinical investigations, though older or foundational phytochemical studies were retained where recent data were sparse. Extracted information encompassed plant identity, part used, extraction techniques, active constituents, experimental models, and observed outcomes. The goal was to present a comprehensive, qualitative overview of the phytochemical constituents and reported antidiabetic effects of Romanian medicinal plants rather than to conduct a formal meta-analysis or bias appraisal.

8. Study Limitations

Most studies rely on in vitro or animal models, and human clinical trials are limited. Additionally, herbal formulations vary in composition, which may affect reproducibility and efficacy across populations

9. Conclusions

Our review demonstrates that many medicinal plants used in Romanian traditional medicine possess significant antidiabetic activity, as shown by numerous in vitro and in vivo studies. Plants such as Urtica dioica, Silybum marianum, and Momordica charantia stand out for their strong preclinical evidence and preliminary clinical results. Their mechanisms of action, including insulin-mimetic effects, stimulation of β-cell regeneration, and reduction in oxidative stress, highlight their clinical relevance and support the idea that these species could be considered as adjuncts in diabetes management.
Despite these encouraging findings, the current body of clinical evidence remains limited. Therefore, future research should prioritize the standardization of plant extracts to ensure consistency and reproducibility across studies. Moreover, there is a clear need for well-designed, randomized controlled clinical trials to validate the efficacy and safety of these promising medicinal plants in human populations. Mechanistic studies that clarify the molecular pathways involved and incorporate biomarkers of glycemic control will also be important for understanding which patient groups are most likely to benefit from phytotherapy.
Bridging the gap between traditional use and clinical application will require collaboration between ethnobotanical research, pharmacology, and clinical sciences. By focusing on these directions, we can move closer to integrating the most effective Romanian medicinal plants into evidence-based strategies for diabetes prevention and treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M.V. and C.E.S.; Methodology, D.D. and N.S.A.; Software, and N.E.C.; Validation, R.M.V. and G.-A.S.; Formal analysis, D.M.T. and D.D.; Investigation, Resources, C.E.S. and N.E.C.; Data curation, D.M.T. and G.-A.S.; Writing—original draft preparation, D.D., and N.E.C.; Writing—review and editing, R.M.V., and C.E.S.; Visualization, G.-A.S. and D.M.T.; Supervision, R.M.V. and N.E.C.; Project administration, D.M.T. and C.E.S.; Funding acquisition, D.D. and G.-A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Article Processing Charges were funded by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

There was no support received (administrative and technical support, or donations in kind) to realize the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sun, H.; Saeedi, P.; Karuranga, S.; Pinkepank, M.; Ogurtsova, K.; Duncan, B.B.; Stein, C.; Basit, A.; Chan, J.C.; Mbanya, J.C.; et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, Regional and Country-Level Diabetes Prevalence Estimates for 2021 and Projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2022, 183, 109119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ahmad, E.; Lim, S.; Lamptey, R.; Webb, D.R.; Davies, M.J. Type 2 Diabetes. Lancet 2022, 400, 1803–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Matheus, A.S.; Tannus, L.R.; Cobas, R.A.; Palma, C.C.; Negrato, C.A.; Gomes, M.B. Impact of Diabetes on Cardiovascular Disease: An Update. Int. J. Hypertens. 2013, 2013, 653789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ştefan, A.G.; Clenciu, D.; Mitrea, A.; Vladu, I.M.; Protasiewicz-Timofticiuc, D.C.; Roşu, M.M.; Maria, D.T.; Dinu, I.R.; Gheonea, T.C.; Vladu, B.E.; et al. Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance in Romania. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chiles, N.S.; Phillips, C.L.; Volpato, S.; Bandinelli, S.; Ferrucci, L.; Guralnik, J.M.; Patel, K.V. Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy, and Lower-Extremity Function. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2014, 28, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mota, M.; Popa, S.G.; Mota, E.; Mitrea, A.; Catrinoiu, D.; Cheta, D.M.; Guja, C.; Hancu, N.; Ionescu-Tirgoviste, C.; Lichiardopol, R.; et al. Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus and Prediabetes in the Adult Romanian Population: PREDATORR Study. J. Diabetes 2016, 8, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gómez-Peralta, F.; Pinés-Corrales, P.J.; Santos, E.; Cuesta, M.; González-Albarrán, O.; Azriel, S.; Castaño, L.; Mathieu, C.; on behalf of the AGORA Diabetes Collaborative Group. Autoimmune Type 1 Diabetes: An Early Approach Appraisal for Spain by the AGORA Diabetes Collaborative Group. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mirea, O.; Oghli, M.G.; Neagoe, O.; Berceanu, M.; Țieranu, E.; Moraru, L.; Raicea, V.; Donoiu, I. All-Cause Mortality Prediction in Subjects with Diabetes Mellitus Using a Machine Learning Model and Shapley Values. Diabetology 2025, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Friedman, J.M. Leptin and the Endocrine Control of Energy Balance. Nat. Metab. 2019, 1, 754–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Akbari, M.; Hassan-Zadeh, V. IL-6 Signalling Pathways and the Development of Type 2 Diabetes. Inflammopharmacology 2018, 26, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kadoglou, N.P.E.; Fotiadis, G.; Kapelouzou, A.; Kostakis, A.; Liapis, C.D.; Vrabas, I.S. The Differential Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Exercise Modalities and Their Association with Early Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabet. Med. 2013, 30, e41–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Freitas Lima, L.C.; de Braga, V.A.; do Socorro de França Silva, M.; de Cruz, J.C.; Sousa Santos, S.H.; de Oliveira Monteiro, M.M.; de Moura Balarini, C. Adipokines, Diabetes and Atherosclerosis: An Inflammatory Association. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guerre-Millo, M. Adipose Tissue and Adipokines: For Better or Worse. Diabetes Metab. 2004, 30, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fisher, F.M.; Chui, P.C.; Antonellis, P.J.; Bina, H.A.; Kharitonenkov, A.; Flier, J.S.; Maratos-Flier, E. Obesity Is a Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21)-Resistant State. Diabetes 2010, 59, 2781–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zajec, A.; Trebušak Podkrajšek, K.; Tesovnik, T.; Šket, R.; Čugalj Kern, B.; Jenko Bizjan, B.; Šmigoc Schweiger, D.; Battelino, T.; Kovač, J. Pathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes: Established Facts and New Insights. Genes 2022, 13, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Keshavarzi, E.; Noveiry, B.B.; Rezaei, N. The Relationship Between GAD65 Autoantibody and the Risk of T1DM Onset. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2022, 21, 1935–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Minniakhmetov, I.; Yalaev, B.; Khusainova, R.; Bondarenko, E.; Melnichenko, G.; Dedov, I.; Mokrysheva, N. Genetic and Epigenetic Aspects of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Modern View on the Problem. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Noble, J.A.; Valdes, A.M. Genetics of the HLA Region in the Prediction of Type 1 Diabetes. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2011, 11, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stene, L.C.; Norris, J.M.; Rewers, M.J. Risk Factors for Type 1 Diabetes. In Diabetes in America [Internet]; Lawrence, J.M., Casagrande, S.S., Herman, W.H., Wexler, D.J., Cefalu, W.T., Eds.; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK): Bethesda, MD, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pugliese, A.; Boulware, D.; Yu, L.; Babu, S.; Steck, A.K.; Becker, D.; Rodriguez, H.; DiMeglio, L.; Evans-Molina, C.; Harrison, L.C.; et al. HLA-DRB115:01-DQA101:02-DQB1*06:02 Haplotype Protects Autoantibody-Positive Relatives From Type 1 Diabetes Throughout the Stages of Disease Progression. Diabetes 2016, 65, 1109–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Milicic, T.; Jotic, A.; Lalic, K.; Lukic, L.; Macesic, M.; Stanarcic Gajovic, J.; Stoiljkovic, M.; Milovancevic, M.; Rafailovic, D.; Bozovic, A.; et al. Insulin Secretion and Insulin Sensitivity Change in Different Stages of Adult-Onset Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Echeverri, A.F.; Tobón, G.J. Autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus (Type 1A). In Autoimmunity: From Bench to Bedside [Internet]; Anaya, J.M., Shoenfeld, Y., Rojas-Villarraga, A., Levy, R.A., Cervera, R., Eds.; El Rosario University Press: Bogotá, Colombia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  23. Młynarska, E.; Czarnik, W.; Dzieża, N.; Jędraszak, W.; Majchrowicz, G.; Prusinowski, F.; Stabrawa, M.; Rysz, J.; Franczyk, B. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: New Pathogenetic Mechanisms, Treatment and the Most Important Complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ferdous, S.-E.; Ferrell, J.M. Pathophysiological Relationship between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Novel Therapeutic Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aljafary, M.A.; Al-Suhaimi, E.A. Adiponectin System (Rescue Hormone): The Missing Link Between Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ebrahimi-Mameghani, M.; Mohammadi, S.; Arefhosseini, S.R.; Fallah, P.; Bazi, Z. Adiponectin as a Potential Biomarker of Vascular Disease. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2015, 11, 55–70. [Google Scholar]
  27. Alam, S.; Hasan, M.K.; Neaz, S.; Hussain, N.; Hossain, M.F.; Rahman, T. Diabetes Mellitus: Insights from Epidemiology, Biochemistry, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Complications and Comprehensive Management. Diabetology 2021, 2, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, M.; Chi, X.; Wang, Y.; Setrerrahmane, S.; Xie, W.; Xu, H. Trends in Insulin Resistance: Insights Into Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ustianowski, P.; Malinowski, D.; Kopytko, P.; Czerewaty, M.; Tarnowski, M.; Dziedziejko, V.; Safranow, K.; Pawlik, A. ADCY5, CAPN10 and JAZF1 Gene Polymorphisms and Placental Expression in Women with Gestational Diabetes. Life 2021, 11, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mine, K.; Yoshikai, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Mori, H.; Anzai, K.; Nagafuchi, S. Genetic Susceptibility of the Host in Virus-Induced Diabetes. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gillett, M.; Royle, P.; Snaith, A.; Scotland, G.; Poobalan, A.; Imamura, M.; Black, C.; Boroujerdi, M.; Jick, S.; Wyness, L.; et al. Non-Pharmacological Interventions to Reduce the Risk of Diabetes in People with Impaired Glucose Regulation: A Systematic Review and Economic Evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 2012, 16, 1–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Spanakis, E.K.; Golden, S.H. Race/ethnic difference in diabetes and diabetic complications. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2013, 13, 814–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mittal, R.; Prasad, K.; Lemos, J.R.N.; Arevalo, G.; Hirani, K. Unveiling Gestational Diabetes: An Overview of Pathophysiology and Management. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sweeting, A.; Wong, J.; Murphy, H.R.; Ross, G.P. A Clinical Update on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Endocr. Rev. 2022, 43, 763–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hossain, M.J.; Al-Mamun, M.; Islam, M.R. Diabetes mellitus, the fastest growing global public health concern: Early detection should be focused. Health Sci. Rep. 2024, 7, e2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Saeedi, P.; Petersohn, I.; Salpea, P.; Malanda, B.; Karuranga, S.; Unwin, N.; Colagiuri, S.; Guariguata, L.; Motala, A.A.; Ogurtsova, K.; et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 157, 107843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Whiting, D.R.; Guariguata, L.; Weil, C.; Shaw, J. IDF diabetes atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2011, 94, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ghojazadeh, M.; Mobasseri, M.; Pournaghi Azar, F.; Lotfi, A. Prevalence and Incidence of Type 1 Diabetes in the World. In Type 1 Diabetes—Causes, Symptoms, and Treatments; IntechOpen: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pappachan, J.M.; Fernandez, C.J.; Ashraf, A.P. Rising tide: The global surge of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents demands action now. World J. Diabetes 2024, 15, 797–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, S.T.; Sun, M.; Xiang, Y. Global, regional, and national trends in type 2 diabetes mellitus burden among adolescents and young adults aged 10–24 years from 1990 to 2021: A trend analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. World J. Pediatr. 2025, 21, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, F.S.; Li, H.J.; Yu, X.; Song, Y.P.; Ren, Y.F.; Qian, X.Z.; Liu, J.L.; Li, W.X.; Huang, Y.R.; Gao, K. Global trends and hotspots of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents: A bibliometric study and visualization analysis. World J. Diabetes 2025, 16, 96032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Reed, J.; Bain, S.; Kanamarlapudi, V. A Review of Current Trends with Type 2 Diabetes Epidemiology, Aetiology, Pathogenesis, Treatments and Future Perspectives. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2021, 14, 3567–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chandrasekaran, P.; Weiskirchen, R. The Role of Obesity in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus—An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Klein, S.; Gastaldelli, A.; Yki-Järvinen, H.; Scherer, P.E. Why does obesity cause diabetes? Cell Metab. 2022, 34, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. WHO Fact Sheets. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 1 May 2025).
  46. Bala, C.; Rusu, A.; Ciobanu, D.; Roman, G. Length of Hospital Stay, Hospitalization Costs, and Their Drivers in Adults with Diabetes in the Romanian Public Hospital System. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 10035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hâncu, A.; Roman, G.; Bala, C.; Timar, B.; Roman, D.; Păun, D.; Mechanick, J.I. Diabetes Care in Romania: A Lesson on the Central Role of Lifestyle Medicine. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2023, 15598276231195572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Green, A.; Hede, S.M.; Patterson, C.C.; Wild, S.H.; Imperatore, G.; Roglic, G.; Beran, D. Type 1 diabetes in 2017: Global estimates of incident and prevalent cases in children and adults. Diabetologia 2021, 64, 2741–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. GBD 2021 Diabetes Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 2023, 402, 203–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dilworth, L.; Facey, A.; Omoruyi, F. Diabetes Mellitus and Its Metabolic Complications: The Role of Adipose Tissues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abel, E.D.; Gloyn, A.L.; Evans-Molina, C.; Joseph, J.J.; Misra, S.; Pajvani, U.B.; Simcox, J.; Susztak, K.; Drucker, D.J. Diabetes mellitus-Progress and opportunities in the evolving epidemic. Cell 2024, 187, 3789–3820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ruze, R.; Liu, T.; Zou, X.; Song, J.; Chen, Y.; Xu, R.; Yin, X.; Xu, Q. Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Connections in epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatments. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1161521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Meng, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Guo, R.; Liu, H.; Yuan, Y.; Li, W.; Song, Q.; et al. Type 3 diabetes and metabolic reprogramming of brain neurons: Causes and therapeutic strategies. Mol. Med. 2025, 31, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Albairmani, R.A.; Basheer, B.M.; Macky, M.M.; Al Syouti, T.; AlZubaidy, H.; Elfaki, E.; Kidwai, A.; Basheer, Y.M.; Ahmed, F.; Salaheldin, M. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Review of Clinical Guidelines and Practices. Cureus 2025, 17, e79334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kawasaki, E. Anti-Islet Autoantibodies in Type 1 Diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Galicia-Garcia, U.; Benito-Vicente, A.; Jebari, S.; Larrea-Sebal, A.; Siddiqi, H.; Uribe, K.B.; Ostolaza, H.; Martín, C. Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. American Diabetes Association. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care 2024, 47 (Suppl. 1), S16–S38. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tamás, G.; Kerényi, Z. Gestational Diabetes: Current Aspects on Pathogenesis and Treatment. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2001, 109 (Suppl. 2), S400–S411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Echouffo-Tcheugui, J.B.; Selvin, E. Prediabetes and What It Means: The Epidemiological Evidence. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2021, 42, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Diabetes Canada 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada. Can. J. Diabetes 2018, 42 (Suppl. 1), S1–S325. [Google Scholar]
  62. Salehi, B.; Ata, A.; Kumar, V.A.N.; Sharopov, F.; Ramírez-Alarcón, K.; Ruiz-Ortega, A.; Ayatollahi, S.A.; Tsouh Fokou, P.V.; Kobarfard, F.; Zakaria, Z.A.; et al. Antidiabetic Potential of Medicinal Plants and Their Active Components. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Governa, P.; Baini, G.; Borgonetti, V.; Cettolin, G.; Giachetti, D.; Magnano, A.R.; Miraldi, E.; Biagi, M. Phytotherapy in the Management of Diabetes: A Review. Molecules 2018, 23, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tran, N.; Pham, B.; Le, L. Bioactive Compounds in Anti-Diabetic Plants: From Herbal Medicine to Modern Drug Discovery. Biology 2020, 9, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Noor, F.; Tahir ul Qamar, M.; Ashfaq, U.A.; Albutti, A.; Alwashmi, A.S.S.; Aljasir, M.A. Network Pharmacology Approach for Medicinal Plants: Review and Assessment. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kamboj, P.; Talukdar, N.C.; Banerjee, S.K. Therapeutic Benefit of Dillenia indica in Diabetes and Its Associated Complications. J. Diabetes Res. 2019, 2019, 4632491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Song, B.-R.; Alam, M.B.; Lee, S.-H. Terpenoid-Rich Extract of Dillenia indica L. Bark Displays Antidiabetic Action in Insulin-Resistant C2C12 Cells and STZ-Induced Diabetic Mice by Attenuation of Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Joseph, B.; Jini, D. Antidiabetic Effects of Momordica charantia (Bitter Melon) and Its Medicinal Potency. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2013, 3, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, B.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, H.; Lee, I.-Y.; Ock, S.; Kwon, S.; Kang, S.-S.; Choi, Y. Momordica charantia (Bitter Melon) Efficacy and Safety on Glucose Metabolism in Korean Prediabetes Participants: A 12-Week, Randomized Clinical Study. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 32, 697–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. El-Saber Batiha, G.; Magdy Beshbishy, A.; El-Mleeh, A.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Prasad Devkota, H. Traditional Uses, Bioactive Chemical Constituents, and Pharmacological and Toxicological Activities of Glycyrrhiza glabra L. (Fabaceae). Biomolecules 2020, 10, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sarker, D.K.; Ray, P.; Dutta, A.K.; Rouf, R.; Uddin, S.J. Antidiabetic Potential of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): A Magic Herb for Diabetes Mellitus. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 7108–7136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Geberemeskel, G.A.; Debebe, Y.G.; Nguse, N.A. Antidiabetic Effect of Fenugreek Seed Powder Solution (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) on Hyperlipidemia in Diabetic Patients. J. Diabetes Res. 2019, 2019, 8507453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kishore, T.S.; Babu, J.A.; Priyadarshini, K.A. Evaluation of Antidiabetic Activity of Trigonella foenum-graecum Leaves in Alloxan Induced Type-II Diabetes. Int. J. Res. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2025, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  74. Lertpatipanpong, P.; Janpaijit, S.; Park, E.Y.; Kim, C.T.; Baek, S.J. Potential Anti-Diabetic Activity of Pueraria lobata Flower (Flos Puerariae) Extracts. Molecules 2020, 25, 3970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, S.; Ge, Q.; Chen, L.; Chen, K. Studies of the Anti-Diabetic Mechanism of Pueraria lobata Based on Metabolomics and Network Pharmacology. Processes 2021, 9, 1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sutedja, A.M.; Yanase, E.; Batubara, I.; Fardiaz, D.; Lioe, H.N. Antidiabetic Components from the Hexane Extract of Red Kidney Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): Isolation and Structure Determination. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2020, 84, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Pereira, A.S.P.; Banegas-Luna, A.J.; Peña-García, J.; Pérez-Sánchez, H.; Apostolides, Z. Evaluation of the Anti-Diabetic Activity of Some Common Herbs and Spices: Providing New Insights with Inverse Virtual Screening. Molecules 2019, 24, 4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. AlBalawi, A.N.; Elmetwalli, A.; Baraka, D.M.; Alnagar, H.A.; Alamri, E.S.; Hassan, M.G. Chemical Constituents, Antioxidant Potential, and Antimicrobial Efficacy of Pimpinella anisum Extracts Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Assaggaf, H.M. Investigating the Antidiabetic Properties of Apium graveolens Extract and Its Inhibition of Enzymes Associated with Hyperglycemia. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 290, 138873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Meutia, R.; Sembiring, N.B.; Nababan, O.A.; Simanjuntak, N.; Novriani, E.; Nurasni, N. Antidiabetic Activity Test of the Ethyl Acetate Fraction of Celery Leaves (Apium graveolens L.) Against Wistar Male Rats (Rattus norvegicus). J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 6, 160–166. [Google Scholar]
  81. Karkute, S.G.; Koley, T.K.; Yengkhom, B.K.; Tripathi, A.; Srivastava, S.; Maurya, A.; Singh, B. Anti-Diabetic Phenolic Compounds of Black Carrot (Daucus carota Subsp. sativus var. atrorubens Alef.) Inhibit Enzymes of Glucose Metabolism: An in silico and in vitro Validation. Med. Chem. 2018, 14, 641–649. [Google Scholar]
  82. Esatbeyoglu, T.; Rodríguez-Werner, M.; Schlösser, A.; Liehr, M.; Ipharraguerre, I.; Winterhalter, P.; Rimbach, G. Fractionation of Plant Bioactives from Black Carrots (Daucus carota subsp. sativus var. atrorubens Alef.) by Adsorptive Membrane Chromatography and Analysis of Their Potential Anti-Diabetic Activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 5901–5908. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ali, A. Chemical Composition, α-Glucosidase Inhibitory and Anticancer Activity of Essential Oil of Thymus vulgaris Leaves. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2021, 24, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Aljelehawy, Q.H.A.; Mohammadi, S.; Mohamadian, E.; Mal Allah, O.R.; Mirzaei, A.; Ghahremanlou, M. Antimicrobial, Anticancer, Antidiabetic, Antineurodegenerative, and Antirheumatic Activities of Thymol: Clarification of Mechanisms. Micro Nano Bio Asp. 2023, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  85. Tundis, R.; Grande, F.; Occhiuzzi, M.A.; Sicari, V.; Loizzo, M.R.; Cappello, A.R. Lavandula angustifolia Mill. (Lamiaceae) Ethanol Extract and Its Main Constituents as Promising Agents for the Treatment of Metabolic Disorders: Chemical Profile, in vitro Biological Studies, and Molecular Docking. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2269481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mahmoodnia, L.; Forouzandeh Shahrakei, Z.; Hojatyar, S.; Setorki, M. Effects of Lavandula angustifolia Hydroalcoholic Extract on the Blood and Urine Biochemical Factors of Diabetic Patients: A Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. J. Basic Res. Med. Sci. 2024, 11, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  87. Behradmanesh, S.; Derees, F.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. Effect of Salvia officinalis on Diabetic Patients. J. Ren. Inj. Prev. 2013, 2, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Ononamadu, C.J.; Seidel, V. Exploring the Antidiabetic Potential of Salvia officinalis Using Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking and ADME/Drug-Likeness Predictions. Plants 2024, 13, 2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Huang, S.M.; Lin, C.H.; Chang, W.F.; Shih, C.C. Antidiabetic and Antihyperlipidemic Activities of Phyllanthus emblica L. Extract in vitro and the Regulation of Akt Phosphorylation, Gluconeogenesis, and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Mice. Food Nutr. Res. 2023, 67, 9492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lin, C.H.; Kuo, Y.H.; Shih, C.C. Antidiabetic and Immunoregulatory Activities of Extract of Phyllanthus emblica L. in NOD with Spontaneous and Cyclophosphamide-Accelerated Diabetic Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Vadivelan, R.; Gopala Krishnan, R.; Kannan, R. Antidiabetic Potential of Asparagus racemosus Willd Leaf Extracts through Inhibition of α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2018, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hannan, J.M.; Ali, L.; Khaleque, J.; Akhter, M.; Flatt, P.R.; Abdel-Wahab, Y.H. Antihyperglycaemic Activity of Asparagus racemosus Roots Is Partly Mediated by Inhibition of Carbohydrate Digestion and Absorption, and Enhancement of Cellular Insulin Action. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 107, 1316–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Satyanarayana, K.; Sravanthi, K.; Shaker, I.A.; Ponnulakshmi, R. Molecular Approach to Identify Antidiabetic Potential of Azadirachta indica. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2015, 6, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mohammed, A.; Kumar, R.; Ashfaq, F.; Alsayegh, A.A.; Al Areefy, A.A.E.H.; Khan, M.I.; Rizvi, S.I. Young and Mature Leaves of Azadirachta indica (Neem) Display Different Antidiabetic and Antioxidative Effects. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2023, 10, 316–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shetty, P.; Rai, M.; Ravindran, A.; Gopalakrishna, H.N.; Pai, V.R.; Kalal, B.S. Hypoglycemic and Hypolipidemic Effects of Garcinia cambogia Extracts in Streptozotocin-Nicotinamide Induced Diabetic Rat Model. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2022, 15, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Chen, T.-H.; Tsai, M.-J.; Fu, Y.-S.; Weng, C.-F. The Exploration of Natural Compounds for Anti-Diabetes from Distinctive Species Garcinia linii with Comprehensive Review of the Garcinia Family. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Im, K.; Issac, A.; Nm, J.; Ninan, E.; Maliakel, B.; Kuttan, R. Effects of the Polyphenol Content on the Anti-Diabetic Activity of Cinnamomum zeylanicum Extracts. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 2208–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Nawaz, A.; Ali, T.; Naeem, M.; Hussain, F.; Li, Z.; Nasir, A. Biochemical, Structural Characterization and In vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant, Antibacterial, Cytotoxic, and Antidiabetic Activities of Nanosuspensions of Cinnamomum zeylanicum Bark Extract. Front. Chem. 2023, 11, 1194389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chen, W.; Balan, P.; Popovich, D.G. Review of Ginseng Anti-Diabetic Studies. Molecules 2019, 24, 4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Liu, Z.; Qu, C.Y.; Li, J.X.; Wang, Y.F.; Li, W.; Wang, C.Z.; Wang, D.S.; Song, J.; Sun, G.Z.; Yuan, C.S. Hypoglycemic and Hypolipidemic Effects of Malonyl Ginsenosides from American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) on Type 2 Diabetic Mice. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 33652–33664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cheng, D.; Liang, B.; Li, Y. Antihyperglycemic Effect of Ginkgo biloba Extract in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes in Rats. BioMed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 162724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Aziz, T.A.; Hussain, S.A.; Mahwi, T.O.; Ahmed, Z.A.; Rahman, H.S.; Rasedee, A. The Efficacy and Safety of Ginkgo biloba Extract as an Adjuvant in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Ineffectively Managed with Metformin: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2018, 12, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Jurčević Šangut, I.; Šola, I.; Šamec, D. Neuroprotective, Anti-Hyperpigmentation, and Anti-Diabetic Effects and Bioaccessibility of Flavonoids in Ginkgo Leaf Infusions from Green and Yellow Leaves. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kazazis, C.E.; Evangelopoulos, A.A.; Kollas, A.; Vallianou, N.G. The Therapeutic Potential of Milk Thistle in Diabetes. Rev. Diabet. Stud. 2014, 11, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lekmine, S.; Benslama, O.; Ola, M.S.; Touzout, N.; Moussa, H.; Tahraoui, H.; Hafsa, H.; Zhang, J.; Amrane, A. Preliminary Data on Silybum marianum Metabolites: Comprehensive Characterization, Antioxidant, Antidiabetic, Antimicrobial Activities, LC-MS/MS Profiling, and Predicted ADMET Analysis. Metabolites 2025, 15, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hao, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Liang, D.; Liu, Y.; Feng, W. Chemical Constituents from Acorus calamus with Potent Anti-Diabetic and Hepatoprotective Activities. Fitoterapia 2023, 169, 105591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Chávez-Silva, F.; Cerón-Romero, L.; Arias-Durán, L.; Navarrete-Vázquez, G.; Almanza-Pérez, J.; Román-Ramos, R.; Ramírez-Ávila, G.; Perea-Arango, I.; Villalobos-Molina, R.; Estrada-Soto, S. Antidiabetic Effect of Achillea millefollium through Multitarget Interactions: α-Glucosidases Inhibition, Insulin Sensitization and Insulin Secretagogue Activities. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 212, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Rezaei, S.; Ashkar, F.; Koohpeyma, F.; Mahmoodi, M.; Gholamalizadeh, M.; Mazloom, Z.; Doaei, S. Hydroalcoholic Extract of Achillea millefolium Improved Blood Glucose, Liver Enzymes and Lipid Profile Compared to Metformin in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Lipids Health Dis. 2020, 19, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ahangarpour, A.; Heidari, H.; Oroojan, A.A.; Mirzavandi, F.; Nasr Esfehani, K.; Dehghan Mohammadi, Z. Antidiabetic, Hypolipidemic and Hepatoprotective Effects of Arctium lappa Root’s Hydro-Alcoholic Extract on Nicotinamide-Streptozotocin Induced Type 2 Model of Diabetes in Male Mice. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2017, 7, 169–179. [Google Scholar]
  110. Zolotova, D.; Teterovska, R.; Bandere, D.; Lauberte, L.; Niedra, S. Antidiabetic Properties of the Root Extracts of Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) and Burdock (Arctium lappa). Plants 2024, 13, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Herrera-Bravo, J.; Semwal, P.; Painuli, S.; Badoni, H.; Ezzat, S.M.; Farid, M.M.; Merghany, R.M.; Aborehab, N.M.; Salem, M.A.; et al. Artemisia spp.: An Update on Its Chemical Composition, Pharmacological and Toxicological Profiles. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 5628601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Neagu, E.; Paun, G.; Albu, C.; Apreutesei, O.T.; Radu, G.L. In vitro Assessment of the Antidiabetic and Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Artemisia absinthium, Artemisia vulgaris and Trigonella foenum-graecum Extracts Processed Using Membrane Technologies. Molecules 2023, 28, 7156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Akhtar, M.S.; Rafiullah, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Ali, M. Antidiabetic Activity of Cichorium intybus L. Water Extract Against Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. J. Umm Al Qura Univ. Appl. Sci. 2023, 9, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ferrare, K.; Bidel, L.P.R.; Awwad, A.; Poucheret, P.; Cazals, G.; Lazennec, F.; Azay-Milhau, J.; Tournier, M.; Lajoix, A.D.; Tousch, D. Increase in Insulin Sensitivity by the Association of Chicoric Acid and Chlorogenic Acid Contained in a Natural Chicoric Acid Extract (NCRAE) of Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) for an Antidiabetic Effect. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 215, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ahmed, O.M.; Abdel Fattah, A.A.; Abdul-Hamid, M.; Abdel-Aziz, A.M.; Sakr, H.I.; Damanhory, A.A.; Abdel-Kawi, S.H.; Ghaboura, N.; Awad, M.M.Y. Antidiabetic and Liver Histological and Ultrastructural Effects of Cynara scolymus Leaf and Flower Head Hydroethanolic Extracts in Nicotinamide/Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2023, 2023, 4223026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Porro, C.; Benameur, T.; Cianciulli, A.; Vacca, M.; Chiarini, M.; De Angelis, M.; Panaro, M.A. Functional and Therapeutic Potential of Cynara scolymus in Health Benefits. Nutrients 2024, 16, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Murtaza, I.; Laila, O.; Drabu, I.; Ahmad, A.; Charifi, W.; Popescu, S.M.; Mansoor, S. Nutritional Profiling, Phytochemical Composition and Antidiabetic Potential of Taraxacum officinale, an Underutilized Herb. Molecules 2022, 27, 5380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sheikh, M. In vitro Antioxidant Activity, Total Phenolic and Total Flavonoid Contents of Taraxacum officinale Leaves. Int. J. Innov. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2015, 3, 697–707. [Google Scholar]
  119. Studzińska-Sroka, E.; Paczkowska-Walendowska, M.; Kledzik, J.; Galanty, A.; Gościniak, A.; Szulc, P.; Korybalska, K.; Cielecka-Piontek, J. Antidiabetic Potential of Black Elderberry Cultivars Flower Extracts: Phytochemical Profile and Enzyme Inhibition. Molecules 2024, 29, 5775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Krejpcio, Z.; Król, E.; Staniek, H.; Oluwatobi, J.M.; Rocha, S.M.; Salvador, A.; Kurek, J. Evaluation of the Effect of Elderberry (Sambucus nigra) Fruit Extracts on Calcium and Magnesium Status in STZ-Induced Diabetic Rats. Proceedings 2023, 91, 228. [Google Scholar]
  121. Mehmood, A.; Zeb, A.; Ateeq, M.K. In Vivo Antidiabetic Effects of Phenolic Compounds of Spinach, Mustard, and Cabbage Leaves in Mice. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Subhash, G.P.; Virbhadrappa, S.R.; Vasant, O.K.; Otari, K.V. Spinacia oleracea Linn, A Pharmacognostic and Pharmacological Overview. Int. J. Res. Ayurveda Pharm. 2010, 1, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
  123. Dzhafarova, R.E.; Garaev, G.S.; Dzhafarkulieva, Z.S. Antidiabetic Action of Extract of Juglans regia L. Georgian Med. News 2009, 170, 110–114. [Google Scholar]
  124. Bourais, I.; Elmarrkechy, S.; Taha, D.; Badaoui, B.; Mourabit, Y.; Salhi, N.; Alshahrani, M.M.; Al Awadh, A.A.; Bouyahya, A.; Goh, K.W.; et al. Comparative Investigation of Chemical Constituents of Kernels, Leaves, Husk, and Bark of Juglans regia L., Using HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS Analysis and Evaluation of Their Antioxidant, Antidiabetic, and Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Molecules 2022, 27, 8989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Muñiz-Ramirez, A.; Perez, R.M.; Garcia, E.; Garcia, F.E. Antidiabetic Activity of Aloe vera Leaves. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2020, 2020, 6371201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Malik, J.A.; Iqbal, S.; Biswas, J.; Riaz, U.; Datta, S. Antidiabetic Property of Aloe vera (Aloe barbadensis) and Bitter Melon (Momordica charantia). In Medicinal and Aromatic Plants; Aftab, T., Hakeem, K.R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  127. Hafizur, R.M.; Kabir, N.; Chishti, S. Asparagus officinalis Extract Controls Blood Glucose by Improving Insulin Secretion and β-Cell Function in Streptozotocin-Induced Type 2 Diabetic Rats. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, 1586–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Olas, B. A Review of the Pro-Health Activity of Asparagus officinalis L. and Its Components. Foods 2024, 13, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Esakki, A.; Ramadoss, R.; Ananthapadmanabhan, L.; Sundar, S.; Panneerselvam, S.; Ramani, P. Quantification of the Anti-Diabetic Effect of Allium cepa. Cureus 2024, 16, e59174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Vu, N.K.; Kim, C.S.; Ha, M.T.; Ngo, Q.-M.T.; Park, S.E.; Kwon, H.; Lee, D.; Choi, J.S.; Kim, J.A.; Min, B.S. Isolation and Identification of Antidiabetic Compounds from Allium cepa and Evaluation of Their Activity in Diabetic Mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 8797–8811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ashraf, R.; Khan, R.A.; Ashraf, I. Garlic (Allium sativum) Supplementation with Standard Antidiabetic Agent Provides Better Diabetic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Patients. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 24, 565–570. [Google Scholar]
  132. Aminabee, S.; Shankar, K.R.; Lakshmi, K.N.V.C.; Saritha, K.; Kavya, R.; Babu, K.C.; Dasari, S.K. Influence of Allium sativum on the Hypoglycaemic Activity of Gliclazide in Normal Rats: A Possible Approach to Herb-Drug Interaction. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2024, 17, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Turkkan, A.; Savas, H.B.; Yavuz, B.; Yigit, A.; Uz, E.; Bayram, N.A.; Kale, B. The Prophylactic Effect of Viscum album in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. North Clin. Istanb. 2016, 3, 83–89. [Google Scholar]
  134. Szurpnicka, A.; Kowalczuk, A.; Szterk, A. Biological Activity of Mistletoe: In vitro and In Vivo Studies and Mechanisms of Action. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2020, 43, 593–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Morales Ramos, J.G.; Esteves Pairazamán, A.T.; Mocarro Willis, M.E.S.; Collantes Santisteban, S.; Caldas Herrera, E. Medicinal Properties of Morus alba for the Control of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review. F1000Research 2021, 10, 1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Özgür, M.; Uçar, A.; Yılmaz, S. The Multifaceted Benefits of Morus nigra L.: A Pharmacological Powerhouse. Phytochem. Rev. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Jelača, S.; Dajić-Stevanović, Z.; Vuković, N.; Kolašinac, S.; Trendafilova, A.; Nedialkov, P.; Stanković, M.; Tanić, N.; Tanić, N.T.; Acović, A.; et al. Beyond Traditional Use of Alchemilla vulgaris: Genoprotective and Antitumor Activity In vitro. Molecules 2022, 27, 8113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Mustafa, K.G.; Ganai, B.A.; Akbar, S.; Dar, M.Y.; Masood, A. β-Cell Protective Efficacy, Hypoglycemic and Hypolipidemic Effects of Extracts of Achillea millefolium in Diabetic Rats. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2012, 10, 185–189. [Google Scholar]
  139. Mallhi, I.Y.; Sohaib, M.; Khan, A.U.; Rabbani, I. Antidiabetic, Antioxidative and Antihyperlipidemic Effects of Strawberry Fruit Extract in Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Rats. Foods 2023, 12, 2911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ibrahim, D.S.; Abd El-Maksoud, M.A. Effect of Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) Leaf Extract on Diabetic Nephropathy in Rats. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 96, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Fattahi, A.; Niyazi, F.; Shahbazi, B.; Farzaei, M.H.; Bahrami, G. Antidiabetic Mechanisms of Rosa canina Fruits: An In vitro Evaluation. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 22, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Vasić, D.; Katanić Stanković, J.S.; Urošević, T.; Kozarski, M.; Naumovski, N.; Khan, H.; Popović-Djordjević, J. Insight into Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant and Anti-Diabetic Properties of Rosehip (Rosa canina L.)-Based Tisanes with Addition of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. and Crocus sativus L. Beverages 2024, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kuczmannová, A.; Balažová, A.; Račanská, E.; Kameníková, M.; Fialová, S.; Majerník, J.; Nagy, M.; Gál, P.; Mučaji, P. Agrimonia eupatoria L. and Cynara cardunculus L. Water Infusions: Comparison of Anti-Diabetic Activities. Molecules 2016, 21, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Jung, C.H.; Zhou, S.; Ding, G.X.; Kim, J.H.; Hong, M.H.; Shin, Y.-C.; Kim, G.J.; Ko, S.-G. Antihyperglycemic Activity of Herb Extracts on Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006, 70, 2556–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ammar, A.H.; Bouajila, J.; Lebrihi, A.; Mathieu, F.; Romdhane, M.; Zagrouba, F. Chemical Composition and In vitro Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Citrus aurantium L. Flowers Essential Oil (Neroli Oil). Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 15, 1034–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Osfor, M.M.H.; Hegazy, A.; Mohammad, A.; Elmadbouly, M.A.; Afify, R.A.M.; Elbahnasawy, A.S. Hypo-Cholesterolemic and Hypoglycemic Effects of Orange Albedo Powder (Citrus aurantium L.) on Male Albino Rats. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 2, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Akinnuga, A.M.; Bamidele, O.; Ebunlomo, O.A.; Adeniyi, O.S.; Adeleyea, G.S.; Ebomuche, L.C. Hypoglycaemic Effects of Dietary Intake of Ripe and Unripe Lycopersicon esculentum (Tomatoes) on Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes Mellitus in Rats. OnLine J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 10, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Aisami, A.; James, J.I.; Maigari, F.U.; Atiku, M.K. Hypoglycemic Effect of Lycopersicon esculentum (Tomato) on Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Rats. J. Biochem. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Chehri, A.; Yarani, R.; Yousefi, Z.; Novin Bahador, T.; Shakouri, S.K.; Ostadrahimi, A.; Mobasseri, M.; Pociot, F.; Araj-Khodaei, M. Anti-Diabetic Potential of Urtica dioica: Current Knowledge and Future Direction. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2022, 21, 931–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Orhan, N.; Aslan, M.; Orhan, D.D.; Ergun, F.; Yeşilada, E. In-Vivo Assessment of Antidiabetic and Antioxidant Activities of Grapevine Leaves (Vitis vinifera) in Diabetic Rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 108, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Karageçili, H.; İzol, E.; Kireçci, E.; Gülçin, İ. Antioxidant, Antidiabetic, Antiglaucoma, and Anticholinergic Effects of Tayfi Grape (Vitis vinifera): A Phytochemical Screening by LC-MS/MS Analysis. Open Chem. 2023, 21, 20230120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Soltani, R.; Hakimi, M.; Asgary, S.; Ghanadian, S.M.; Keshvari, M.; Sarrafzadegan, N. Evaluation of the Effects of Vaccinium arctostaphylos L. Fruit Extract on Serum Lipids and hs-CRP Levels and Oxidative Stress in Adult Patients with Hyperlipidemia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2014, 2014, 217451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ozkan, G.; Ercisli, S.; Zeb, A.; Agar, G.; Sagbas, H.I.; Ilhan, G. Some Morphological and Biochemical Characteristics of Wild Grown Caucasian Whortleberry (Vaccinium arctostaphylos L.) Genotypes from Northeastern Turkey. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj Napoca 2018, 47, 378–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Dupak, R.; Hrnkova, J.; Simonova, N.; Kovac, J.; Ivanisova, E.; Kalafova, A.; Schneidgenova, M.; Prnova, M.S.; Brindza, J.; Tokarova, K.; et al. The Consumption of Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Effectively Alleviates Type 2 Diabetes Symptoms in Spontaneous Diabetic Rats. Res. Vet. Sci. 2022, 152, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Jaszcza, K.; Grzegorzewska, A.K.; Sachman, A.; Kalafova, A.; Massanyi, P.; Kovacik, A.; Dupak, R.; Capcarova, M. The Effect of Metformin and Sea Buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) in Alleviating the Symptoms of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Liver of Zucker Diabetic Fatty Rats. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2025, 76, 7. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comparative mechanisms in the development of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: immune-mediated β-cell destruction versus cytokine-induced insulin resistance (https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/682dfe31f26acbac3cfcc195, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Figure 1. Comparative mechanisms in the development of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: immune-mediated β-cell destruction versus cytokine-induced insulin resistance (https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/682dfe31f26acbac3cfcc195, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Pharmaceuticals 18 01035 g001
Figure 2. Bioactive compounds from medicinal plants exert antidiabetic effects through multiple pathways, including pancreatic β-cell stimulation and regeneration, inhibition of intestinal carbohydrate-digesting enzymes, modulation of hepatic glucose production, enhancement of peripheral insulin sensitivity, and oxidative stress reduction. Created with Biorender https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/682df40ad1bac00b3718670b, accessed on 30 April 2025.
Figure 2. Bioactive compounds from medicinal plants exert antidiabetic effects through multiple pathways, including pancreatic β-cell stimulation and regeneration, inhibition of intestinal carbohydrate-digesting enzymes, modulation of hepatic glucose production, enhancement of peripheral insulin sensitivity, and oxidative stress reduction. Created with Biorender https://app.biorender.com/illustrations/682df40ad1bac00b3718670b, accessed on 30 April 2025.
Pharmaceuticals 18 01035 g002
Table 1. Genetic and Environmental Factors Influencing Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Across Populations.
Table 1. Genetic and Environmental Factors Influencing Type 2 Diabetes Susceptibility Across Populations.
Factor/Gene (Variant)DescriptionPopulation (s)/EffectReference
South Asian origin populationsHeightened sensitivity to diabetes and increased insulin resistance; protective Pro12Ala PPARγ polymorphism in Caucasians shows no protection in IndiansIndian descent vs. Caucasians[27]
Candidate genes (overall)>50 genes associated with T2DM have been studied; results often inconsistent due to small samples, ethnic differences, environment, gene–environment interplayVarious worldwide populations
PPARγ Pro alleleVariant reduces insulin sensitivity and markedly increases T2DM risk; carries significant burden of cases~98% of Europeans carry ≥1 Pro allele (~25% of Caucasian T2DM cases)[28]
KCNJ11 (Lys allele) and ABCC8 (Ala variant)Both encode subunits of the ATP-sensitive K+ channel (Kir6.2/SUR1) critical for insulin secretion; associated with T2DMPancreatic β-cells[28]
CAPN10Encodes calpain-10, a Ca2+-dependent protease; altered activity impairs insulin secretion; higher genetic risk in Mexican-Americans, lower in CaucasiansMexican-American (↑ risk); Caucasian (↓ risk)[29]
Viral infections (EBV, Coxsackie, mumps, CMV)Proposed triggers for diabetes via direct β-cell destruction or autoimmune activation
Table 4. Plant-based hypoglycemic products used in Romania for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.
Table 4. Plant-based hypoglycemic products used in Romania for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.
Plant Species (Family)Active CompoundsEffective Concentration (In Vitro In Vivo)IC50/EC50 (Target/Assay)Mechanism of Action
Dillenia indica (Dilleniaceae), elephant appleTannins, pentacyclic triterpenic alcohols (betulin, betulinic acid, betulinic aldehyde), sterols (β-sitosterol), flavonosides, phenolic compoundsBetulinic acid (approx. 0.3% DW; tested as part of methanolic fruit extract at 100–400 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 30.75 μg/mL (methanolic fruit extract)Similar to glibenclamide; has beneficial effects on the histopathological changes in the pancreas, liver, and kidneys [66,67]
Momordica charantia (Cucurbitaceae), bitter melonPolypeptide-P, gurmarin (“plant insulin”), bitter principles (charantin)mcIRBP peptide (natural content in fresh fruit: approx. 0.5–1.2 mg/g; tested in vitro/in vivo); cucurbitane triterpenoids (content not specified; tested at 10 μM, in vitro)Charantin α-glucosidase IC50: 10.8 μg/mL (isolated compound); mcIRBP EC50: 0.96 μg/mL Action begins 30–60 min after oral administration with peak activity at 4 h; mimics bovine insulin, has antioxidant properties, regenerates β-cells, stimulates insulin secretion (sulfonylurea-like mechanism), increases glycogenogenesis, insulin-like activity [68,69]
Glycyrrhiza glabra (Fabaceae), licoriceSterols, flavones, tannins, enzymes, saponins, volatile oilsGlycyrrhizin (natural content in root: approx. 2–9% DW; tested as part of ethanolic root extract at 10–100 μM, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 12.8 μg/mL (ethanolic root extract) Acts as a PPAR agonist, improving hyperinsulinemia [70]
Trigonella foenum-graecum (Fabaceae), fenugreekSterols (lecithin, phytic acid, other phytosterols), bitter substances, volatile oil, tannins, saponins, coumarinsDiosgenin (natural content in seeds: approx. 0.1–0.3%; tested at 8–19 mM, in vitro); ethanolic seed extract (galactomannan: 30–50%; tested at 3–11 μg/mL, in vitro)Diosgenin EC50 (GLUT4): 8 mM (pure compound); α-glucosidase IC50: 30.15 μg/mL (ethanolic seed extract)Stimulates glucose transport; regulates glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and fatty acid synthesis; reduces oxidative stress associated with hyperglycemia; and delays the progression of diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy [71,72,73]
Pueraria lobata (Fabaceae), kudzuSterols, coumarins, saponins, isoflavonesPuerarin (natural content in root: approx. 3–9%; tested at 100 μM, in vitro; as part of ethanolic root extract)α-glucosidase IC50: 45.4 μg/mL (ethanolic root extract)Restores secretory function of β-cells, enhances insulin secretion, inhibits glucose absorption; isoflavones act as PPAR agonists, block IL-12 synthesis, inhibit TH-1 differentiation; prevent and delay T2DM and cardiovascular complications [74,75]
Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae), common beanSulfur-containing amino acids, alkaloids, anthocyanins, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, terpenoids Phaseolamin (natural content in extract: approx. 0.5–2%; tested as part of aqueous seed extract at 100 μg/mL, in vitroα-amylase IC50: 44.2 μg/mL (aqueous seed extract)Stimulates insulin secretion, increases glucose tolerance; potency similar to tolbutamide [76]
Pimpinella anisum (Apiaceae), aniseVolatile oil (80–90% anethole, methyl chavicol or isomethylchavicol, small amounts of anisic ketones and aldehydes)Anethole (main component, essential oil; tested as methanolic seed extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: ~67 μg/mL (methanolic seed extract)Increases glutathione-S-transferase activity, has antioxidant effect, reduces cholesterol and triglyceride levels [77,78]
Apium graveolens (Apiaceae), celerySedanenolides, neocnidilide, neophytadiene, essential oil (limonene, β-selinene, nerolidol, α-selinene, β-pinene, carvone, β-myrcene) Phthalides and apigenin (main actives; natural content not specified; tested as ethanolic seed extract at 100–400 μg/mL, in vitro)Not available (no IC50 for glucose uptake); α-glucosidase IC50: ~80 μg/mL (ethanolic seed extract)Induces insulin receptor phosphorylation
Promotes GLUT-4 translocation (in muscle and adipose cells)
Inhibits gene expression involved in adipogenesis
Enhances peripheral glucose utilization [79,80]
Daucus carota (Apiaceae), carrotMineral salts, carotenoids, vitamins (C, B-complex, folic acid), fibers (cellulose and lignin), acids (glutamic, succinic, lactic, glycolic), polyphenolcarboxylic acids (caffeic acid), anthocyanins Carotenoids, caffeic acid derivatives (natural content: β-carotene ~7–14 mg/100g; extract tested at 100–400 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 75 μg/mL (aqueous root extract)Improves glucose tolerance
Inhibit enzymes of glucose metabolism [81,82]
Thymus vulgaris (Lamiaceae), thymeVolatile oils (thymol, p-cymene, borneol, geraniol, carvacrol, linalool, bornyl acetate, α-pinene), saponins, ursolic acid, oleanolic acid, caffeic acid, flavonoids (luteolin, luteolin-7-glycoside), sterols, waxes, triterpenes, bitter principlesThymol, carvacrol (essential oil; tested as ethanolic aerial part extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 49.8 μg/mL (ethanolic aerial part extract)Reduces hyperinsulinemia, increases SOD (superoxide dismutase) concentration, counteracts oxidative effects, preventing diabetic complications [83,84]
Lavandula angustifolia (Lamiaceae), lavenderVolatile oil (linalyl acetate, linalyl butyrate, geraniol, free linalool, linalyl valerate, borneol, α-pinene), coumarins, caryophyllene, tannins, bitter principlesLinalool (main in oil; natural content not specified; hydroalcoholic flower extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 72.8 μg/mL (hydroalcoholic flower extract)Stimulates glucose uptake in muscle cell cultures, increases insulin secretion via a sulfonylurea-like mechanism [85,86]
Salvia officinalis (Lamiaceae), sageEssential oil, thujone, α- and β-pinene, camphor, borneol, cineole, tannins, sitosterols, estrogen-like substances, bitter principles (picrosalvin), nicotinic acid, caffeic acid, fumaric acid, resins, vitamins B1 and C, mineral salts Thujone, rosmarinic acid (thujone ~30–50% oil; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 59.4 μg/mL (ethanolic leaf extract)Stimulates insulin production and secretion; increases glucose utilization in tissues similarly to metformin; inhibits glucose absorption [87,88]
Phyllanthus emblica (Phyllanthaceae), Indian gooseberryTannins (gallic acid, ellagic acid), norsesquiterpenoids, flavonosidesGallic/ellagic acid (main actives; total phenolics ~50–100 mg GAE/g; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 46.2 μg/mL (ethanolic fruit extract)Inhibits neuropathic pain by modulating oxidative stress, nitrite levels, cytokines (IL-1β, TGF-β1); used as a strong antioxidant and immunomodulator; inhibits α-amylase and α-glucosidase; reduces severity of acute pancreatitis and promotes pancreas repair; lowers cholesterol and triglycerides, improves liver function via ALT normalization [89,90]
Asparagus racemosus (Asparagaceae), shatavariTannins, saponins (shatavarins A and B, filiasparoside C, asparanin A), isoflavones, satavarin (a glycoside of glucose, rhamnose, and sarsapogenin), vanillin, coniferin, sarsaponinShatavarin IV (main saponin; content ~0.1–0.2% root; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 85 μg/mL (ethanolic root extract)Tannic acid induces insulin receptor phosphorylation, mediates GLUT-4 translocation; inhibits adipogenesis-related gene expression; prevents diabetic nephropathy; used for polydipsia in diabetes insipidus [91,92]
Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae), NeemBitter compounds: nimbin, nimbinin, and nimbidin. Leaves contain quercetin, beta-sitosterol, the diterpenoids mahogany and nimbogone, vitamins (A, E, C, riboflavin, and niacin), and minerals (Se, Zn, Cu, Mg, Cr) Nimbin, nimbidin (main actives; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-amylase IC50: 52.4 μg/mL (aqueous leaf extract)Decreases glucose absorption
Antioxidant properties, inhibits α-amylase and α-glucosidase
Inhibits SGLUT-1 activity
Increases activity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
Exerts insulin-like effect
Increases levels of superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione transferase
Hypoglycemic effect comparable to glibenclamide [93,94]
Garcinia cambogia (Clusiaceae), garciniaTartaric, citric, and phosphoric acids; two poly-isoprenylated benzophenones; mangostin derivatives of camboginol and cambogin Hydroxycitric acid (HCA; content in fruit rind ~16–20%; extract tested at 100–500 μg/mL, in vitro)α-amylase IC50: 60.5 μg/mL (aqueous fruit extract)The mentioned acids suppress lipogenesis by inhibiting citrate lyase, which assists in converting excess carbohydrates into fat
Reduces triglycerides and cholesterol; resin confers satiety
Main constituent, hydroxycitric acid, reduces appetite and increases fat oxidation [95,96]
Cinnamomum zeylanicum (Lauraceae), cinnamon treeDiterpenes, essential oil rich in eugenol, cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl acetate, cinnamic alcohol, and 2-hydroxycinnamaldehyde, coumarins, terpenes, tannins, proanthocyanidins Cinnamaldehyde, polyphenols (content in bark oil: cinnamaldehyde 65–80%; extract tested at 10–100 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 16.3 μg/mL (aqueous bark extract)Mimics insulin action (via tannic acid)
Stimulates glycogen synthesis
Contains glutathione and flavonoids (MHCP—methylhydroxychalcone polymer), increasing adipose tissue sensitivity to insulin [97,98]
Panax quinquefolius (Araliaceae), American ginsengSaponozide, saponins, tannins, bitter principles, vitamins A, B1, B2, B5, B6, B12, D3, E, folic acid, nicotinamide, mucilage, waxes, Zn, K, Fe, Si Ginsenosides (content in root: 3–5%; extract tested at 10–100 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 38.2 μg/mL (ethanolic root extract)Stabilizes blood glucose levels by increasing tissue insulin sensitivity
Polypeptides exert hypoglycemic action and stimulate hepatic glycogen synthesis
Strong antioxidant activity
Increases HDL-cholesterol plasma fraction [99,100]
Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgoaceae), maidenhair treeDiterpenes (ginkgolides A, B, C and ginkgolide J), sesquiterpenes (bilobalide); leaves contain flavonols (kaempferol, quercetin, isorhamnetin), biflavones (bilobetin, ginkgetin, isoginkgetin), catechins, proanthocyanidins, sterols, 6-hydroxymurenic acidGinkgolide/flavone (leaf extract; content: ginkgolide 0.5–1% DW; tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 41.3 μg/mL (ethanolic leaf extract)Improves blood circulation and prevents complications
Prevents insulin resistance [101,102,103]
Silybum marianum (Asteraceae), milk thistleSaponins, essential oil; fruits contain silymarin (silibinin, silidianin, silicristin), betaine hydrochloride, amino acids (L-cysteine, glycine, glutamic acid, D-2-aminobutyric acid, D-leucine, tyramine), lipids (3–4%), polyhydroxyphenylchromones, fumaric acidSilymarin (fruit/seed extract; content: silymarin 1.5–3% seeds; tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 32.4 μg/mL (methanolic seed extract)Stimulates glucose transport
Regulates glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and fatty acid synthesis
Reduces oxidative stress related to hyperglycemia
Delays diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy
Increases glucose tolerance
Reduces AGE and ALE formation
Silibinin improves β-cell viability and may serve as a therapeutic agent for type 2 diabetes [104,105]
Acorus calamus (Araceae), sweet flagVolatile oil (1.5–3.5%) containing asarone, azaril aldehyde, methyl isoeugenol, linalool, sesquiterpenes, α-pinene, camphene, camphor, eugenol, tannins, bitter substances, resins, mineral salts β-asarone (rhizome oil; content: 1–3% in oil; extract tested at 25–100 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 28.1 μg/mL (ethanolic rhizome extract)Increases insulin release and secretion similarly to gliclazide; inhibits α-glucosidase and improves insulin resistance; inhibits preadipocyte differentiation into adipocytes; β-asarone attenuates ERK1/2 phosphorylation involved in early adipogenesis [106]
Achillea millefolium (Asteraceae), yarrowVolatile oil, chamazulene, azulenes, asarone, proazulenes, cineole, borneol, pinene, limonene, caryophyllene, achilleine, achilleic acid, organic acids (formic, valeric), tannins Chamazulene, apigenin (extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 61.2 μg/mL (methanolic aerial part extract)Regenerates β-pancreatic cells; hypolipidemic effect [107,108]
Arctium lappa (Asteraceae), burdockArctiin, essential oil, flavonoids, inulin, palmitic acid, caffeic acid, stigmasterol, sitosterol, bitter substances, carotenoids, mineral salts Arctiin, inulin (inulin content: 30–50% root DW; extract tested at 100–400 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 37.4 μg/mL (aqueous root extract)β-sitosterol-D glucopyranoside inhibits α-glucosidase; inulin improves glucose tolerance [109,110]
Artemisia absinthium (Asteraceae), wormwoodEssential oil (0.5%) with myrcene, α-pinene, thujone, nerol, camphor, limonene, phellandrene, β-caryophyllene, sesquiterpene lactones (artabsin, absinthin) Thujone, absinthin (oil: thujone 30–50%; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 43.1 μg/mL (methanolic aerial part extract)Hypoglycemic effects similar to metformin; stimulates glycogenogenesis [111,112]
Cichorium intybus (Asteraceae), chicoryInulin, cichorin, chicoric acid, volatile oil, flavonoids, anthocyanins, bitter triterpenes (lactucopicrin), tannins, mineral salts Inulin (root content: 15–20% DW; methanolic root extract tested at 100–400 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 45.5 μg/mL (methanolic root extract)Improves glucose tolerance; reduces hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase activity [113,114]
Cynara scolymus (Asteraceae), artichokePolyphenols (caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, cynarin), flavones, potassium, and magnesium salts Cynarin, chlorogenic acid (leaf content: chlorogenic acid 1–2% DW; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 36.5 μg/mL (methanolic leaf extract)Insulin-mimetic, hypolipidemic, antioxidant effects [115,116]
Taraxacum officinale (Asteraceae), dandelionFlavones (rutoside, hyperoside, quercetol), hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives (caffeic and chlorogenic acid), catechin tannins, sterols, triterpenes, carotenoids, coumarins, mucilage Caffeic acid, inulin (root: inulin 15–25% DW; extract tested at 100–400 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 42.7 μg/mL (aqueous root extract)Tannins reduce amylase activity by chelating calcium; hypolipidemic effects [117,118]
Sambucus nigra (Caprifoliaceae), elderberryAnthocyanins, essential oil, quercetin derivatives, cyanogenic glycoside (sambunigrin), mucilage, flavonosides Anthocyanins, flavonols (flower content: total anthocyanins ~200–400 mg/100g DW; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 55.1 μg/mL (aqueous flower extract)Insulin-like effect; increases insulin secretion and release [119,120]
Spinacia oleracea (Chenopodiaceae), spinachFlavonoids (quercetin, myricetin, kaempferol, apigenin, luteolin, spinacetin), phenolic acids (ferulic, coumaric), carotenoids, vitamins (A, E, C, K, folic acid), minerals Quercetin, kaempferol (leaf content: quercetin 10–30 mg/100 g FW; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 62.3 μg/mL (aqueous leaf extract)Potentiates insulin and protects β-pancreatic cells from oxidative damage similar to glibenclamide [121,122]
Juglans regia (Juglandaceae), walnutRiboflavin, niacin, vitamin C, ellagic tannins, inositol, juglone, essential oil. The pericarp contains juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone), tannins, etheric oil, chlorophylls, starch, pectins, organic acids Juglone, ellagitannins (leaf content: juglone ~20–50 mg/100 g; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 35.2 μg/mL (methanolic leaf extract)Increases tissue sensitivity to insulin, induces phosphorylation of insulin receptors, involved in GLUT-4 translocation, and inhibits the expression of certain genes [123,124]
Aloe vera, (Liliaceae), aloeAloe-emodin, aloin A and B, aloe-emodin, chrysophanol (free or glycosidic), resins (10–20%), essential oil in small quantities, mineral salts Aloin, aloe-emodin (gel content: aloin 0.1–0.4%; extract tested at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 50.9 μg/mL (aqueous gel extract)Reduces blood glucose in type 2 diabetes with insulin-like activity. Lowers blood lipids and triglycerides
Enhances insulin effects and protects β-pancreatic cells from oxidative damage
Hypoglycemic action similar to metformin
Increases GLUT-4 mRNA synthesis
Lowers TC, LDL, TG, and VLDL; increases hepatic glycogen; inhibits lipogenesis [125,126]
Asparagus officinalis (Liliaceae), asparagusAsparagine, lipids, carbohydrates, phytohormones, enzymes, sterols, cellulose, mineral salts Asparagine, saponins (root: asparagine ~0.03%; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 69.3 μg/mL (methanolic root extract)Potentiates insulin and protects β-pancreatic cells from oxidative damage [127,128]
Allium cepa (Liliaceae), onionCycloalliin, methylalliin, propylalliin, cepaenes, flavonoid derivatives (quercetin and kaempferol glycosides), saponins, amines, enzymes Quercetin, alliin (bulb: quercetin ~10–30 mg/100 g FW; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 40.1 μg/mL (aqueous bulb extract)Hypoglycemic effect similar to glibenclamide and insulin [129,130]
Allium sativum (Liliaceae), garlicSulfur compounds; flavonosides; vitamins (A, B1, B2, C); phytosterol; glycerides of palmitic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, and myristic acids; allicin; steroid derivatives (erubosides) Allicin, alliin (bulb: allicin ~0.1–0.5%; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 28.9 μg/mL (ethanolic bulb extract)Hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects, similar to glibenclamide and insulin [131,132]
Viscum album (Loranthaceae), mistletoeTriterpenic saponins, oleanolic acid derivatives, viscotoxin, viscol, amines (choline, acetylcholine), β-phenylethylamine, lipids, glycosidic substances Oleanolic acid glycosides, viscotoxins (leaf: oleanolic acid ~0.2–0.4%; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 58.4 μg/mL (aqueous leaf extract)Increases insulin secretion and peripheral glucose utilization; hypoglycemic effect comparable to glibenclamide [133,134]
Morus alba / nigra (Moraceae), mulberryCitric, aspartic, folic, and folinic acids, volatile compounds, β-carotene, tannins, phenolic compounds, alkaloids, anthocyanins, minerals, vitamins C, B2, B3 DNJ (1-deoxynojirimycin, leaf: 0.1–0.2%; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 32.1 μg/mL (methanolic leaf extract)Stimulates cellular glucose uptake; insulin-mimetic effect [135,136]
Alchemilla vulgaris (Rosaceae), lady mantleEllagic tannins, polyphenolcarboxylic acids (chlorogenic acid), saponins, flavonoids, ellagic and luteic acid, fatty compounds (stearic and palmitic acids), phytosterols, mineral salts Ellagitannins, chlorogenic acid (aerial part: ellagitannins ~1%; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 57.6 μg/mL (aqueous aerial part extract)Improves glucose tolerance; anorexigenic effect [137,138]
Fragaria ananassa (Rosaceae), strawberryFragarol; oily substances; citric, malic, and ascorbic acids; anthocyanins; citrol; polyphenols; vitamins A, B, C Anthocyanins, ellagic acid (fruit: anthocyanins 20–50 mg/100 g FW; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 47.9 μg/mL (methanolic fruit extract)Inhibits α-glucosidase; antioxidant effect [139,140]
Rosa canina (Rosaceae), rosehipCarotenoids, terpenoids, anthocyanins, vitamins C, B1, B2, PP, K Ascorbic acid, flavonoids (fruit: ascorbic acid 0.3–0.7%; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 53.2 μg/mL (methanolic fruit extract)Stimulates insulin secretion [141,142]
Agrimonia eupatoria (Rosaceae), common agrimony Catechin-type tannins, gallotannins, ellagitannins, free quercetin, hyperin, rutin, apigenin and luteolin glycosides, bitter substances, traces of essential oil, ursolic acid, organic acids, mucilage, coumarins, vitamins (C, K), triterpenes, fatty acids, flavonoids, saponinsCatechin, ellagitannins (aerial part: ellagitannins ~0.8%; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 50.2 μg/mL (methanolic aerial part extract)Stimulates glucose uptake in cultured muscle cells
Increases insulin secretion via sulfonylurea-like mechanism [143,144]
Citrus aurantium (Rutaceae), bitter orangeCitric and malic acids, calcium and potassium citrate, vitamins A, B1, B2, B3, D, E, PP, essential oil (limonene, nerolidol, terpineol, farnesol, pinene, phellandrene), flavonoids Hesperidin, synephrine (peel: hesperidin ~0.2–0.5%; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 54.5 μg/mL (ethanolic fruit peel extract)Reduces insulin resistance, lowers LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides, antioxidant activity [145,146]
Lycopersicon esculentum (Solanaceae), tomatoFlavonoids, lycopene, organic acids (malic, pectic, citric), vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, C, PP, E, K, β-carotene, minerals Lycopene, β-carotene (fruit: lycopene 2–5 mg/100g FW; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 60.1 μg/mL (methanolic fruit extract)Stimulates insulin secretion, improves insulin resistance [147,148]
Urtica dioica (Urticaceae), stinging nettlePolyphenols, amino acids, sterols, essential oil, sitosterols, ursolic acid, vitamins C, B2, K, chlorophylls, protoporphyrin, β-carotene, alkaloids Phenolic compounds, sterols (leaf: total phenolics 20–40 mg/g DW; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 44.7 μg/mL (methanolic leaf extract)Insulin-mimetic effect, reduces LDL-cholesterol [149]
Vitis vinifera (Vitaceae), grapevinePolyphenols, resveratrol, anthocyanins, flavonosides, tartaric and malic acid, tannins, minerals, vitamins A, C, E Resveratrol, proanthocyanidins (seed: proanthocyanidins 5–10%; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 38.6 μg/mL (methanolic seed extract)Antioxidant, reduces oxidative stress, insulin-like effect, lowers glucose absorption, regenerates β-pancreatic cells [150,151]
Vaccinium arctostaphylos (Ericaceae), bearberryFlavonoids (quercetin), tannins Quercetin, arbutin (leaf: arbutin 5–7% DW; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-amylase IC50: 42.2 μg/mL (aqueous leaf extract)Inhibits α-amylase [152,153]
Hippophae rhamnoides (Elaeagnaceae), sea buckthornCarotenoids, flavonoids, proanthocyanidins, catechin tannins, triterpenic acids, vitamin C Carotenoids, flavonoids, vitamin C (fruit: carotenoids 3–8 mg/100g FW; extract at 50–200 μg/mL, in vitro)α-glucosidase IC50: 48.3 μg/mL (ethanolic fruit extract)Inhibits α-glucosidase [154,155]
IC50—half maximal inhibitory concentration; FW—fresh weight; DW—dry weight; n.a.—not available.
Table 5. Distribution of the antidiabetic medicinal plants by experimental model and duration in antidiabetic research.
Table 5. Distribution of the antidiabetic medicinal plants by experimental model and duration in antidiabetic research.
Experiment Duration/ModelPlants Tested in This Model
Cell culture (glucose uptake/GLUT4, 24–48 h, insulin secretion)Momordica charantia, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Pueraria lobata, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Phaseolus vulgaris, Agrimonia eupatoria, Spinacia oleracea, Juglans regia, (unele studii pentru Allium cepa, Allium sativum, Morus alba/nigra, Rosa canina, Apium graveolens, Silybum marianum, Cichorium intybus, Asparagus officinalis, Aloe vera, Urtica dioica, Vitis vinifera)
Enzyme inhibition (α-glucosidase/α-amylase, 30–60 min, in vitro enzyme assay)Dillenia indica, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Phaseolus vulgaris, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Pueraria lobata, Apium graveolens, Daucus carota, Thymus vulgaris, Lavandula angustifolia, Salvia officinalis, Pimpinella anisum, Silybum marianum, Acorus calamus, Achillea millefolium, Arctium lappa, Artemisia absinthium, Cichorium intybus, Cynara scolymus, Taraxacum officinale, Sambucus nigra, Spinacia oleracea, Juglans regia, Urtica dioica, Vitis vinifera, Vaccinium arctostaphylos, Hippophae rhamnoides, Alchemilla vulgaris, Fragaria ananassa, Rosa canina, Citrus aurantium, Lycopersicon esculentum, Morus alba/nigra, Allium cepa, Allium sativum, Viscum album, Asparagus racemosus, Azadirachta indica, Garcinia cambogia, Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Panax quinquefolius, Phyllanthus emblica
Animal studies (in vivo, 2–8 weeks, effect on glycemia, β-cell, complications, etc.)Momordica charantia, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Glycyrrhiza glabra, Silybum marianum, Achillea millefolium, Cynara scolymus, Taraxacum officinale, Sambucus nigra, Juglans regia, Urtica dioica, Rosa canina, Citrus aurantium, Hippophae rhamnoides, Allium cepa, Allium sativum, Viscum album, Azadirachta indica, Panax quinquefolius, Phyllanthus emblica, Cichorium intybus, Pueraria lobata, Spinacia oleracea, Alchemilla vulgaris, Fragaria ananassa, Agrimonia eupatoria, Asparagus racemosus, Morus alba/nigra, Acorus calamus, Daucus carota, Apium graveolens, Arctium lappa, Lavandula angustifolia, Salvia officinalis, Thymus vulgaris, Vaccinium arctostaphylos, Aloe vera, Vitis vinifera, Garcinia cambogia, Dillenia indica, Phyllanthus emblica, Pimpinella anisum, Thymus vulgaris
Human/clinical studies (weeks–months, when available)Momordica charantia, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Silybum marianum, Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Allium sativum, Vitis vinifera, Salvia officinalis, Panax quinquefolius, Morus alba/nigra, Aloe vera, Glycyrrhiza glabra
Table 6. Ethnobotanical categorization of antidiabetic plants based on their occurrence in Romania.
Table 6. Ethnobotanical categorization of antidiabetic plants based on their occurrence in Romania.
Wild-Growing Plants in Romania (Native Wild Flora)Not Wild-Growing but Cultivated in Romania:Neither Wild-Growing nor Commonly Cultivated in Romania:
Apium graveolens
Daucus carota
Thymus vulgaris
Lavandula angustifolia
Salvia officinalis
Achillea millefolium
Arctium lappa
Artemisia absinthium
Silybum marianum
Cichorium intybus
Taraxacum officinale
Sambucus nigra
Juglans regia
Acorus calamus
Viscum album
Morus alba/nigra
Alchemilla vulgaris
Rosa canina
Agrimonia eupatoria
Urtica dioica
Vaccinium arctostaphylos
Hippophae rhamnoides
Glycyrrhiza glabra
Trigonella foenum-graecum
Phaseolus vulgaris
Spinacia oleracea
Asparagus officinalis
Fragaria ananassa
Citrus aurantium
Lycopersicon esculentum
Pimpinella anisum
Apium graveolens
Allium cepa
Allium sativum
Vitis vinifera
Dillenia indica
Momordica charantia
Pueraria lobata
Phyllanthus emblica
Asparagus racemosus
Azadirachta indica
Garcinia cambogia
Cinnamomum zeylanicum
Panax quinquefolius
Ginkgo biloba
Aloe vera
Table 7. Molecular target and pathway distribution of antidiabetic medicinal plants.
Table 7. Molecular target and pathway distribution of antidiabetic medicinal plants.
Molecular Target/PathwayMedicinal Plants (Main Bioactive Compounds)
AMPK activationMomordica charantia (charantin), Silybum marianum (silymarin), Vitis vinifera (resveratrol), Viscum album, Arctium lappa (oleanolic acid), Spinacia oleracea (quercetin), Pueraria lobata (puerarin), Glycyrrhiza glabra (possibly via anti-inflam.), Lavandula angustifolia (rosmarinic acid)
PPAR-γ modulationGlycyrrhiza glabra (glycyrrhizin), Pueraria lobata (puerarin), Viscum album, Silybum marianum, Vitis vinifera
PI3K/Akt → GLUT4 translocationTrigonella foenum-graecum (diosgenin), Momordica charantia (mcIRBP), Glycyrrhiza glabra, Pueraria lobata, Allium cepa (quercetin), Spinacia oleracea
α-glucosidase inhibitionMorus alba/nigra (DNJ), Phaseolus vulgaris (phaseolamin), Cinnamomum zeylanicum (cinnamaldehyde), Dillenia indica, Arctium lappa (arctiin), Vaccinium arctostaphylos, Salvia officinalis, Apium graveolens, Cichorium intybus, Silybum marianum, Acorus calamus, Achillea millefolium, Cynara scolymus, Taraxacum officinale, Sambucus nigra, Allium cepa, Urtica dioica, Fragaria ananassa, Rosa canina, Hippophae rhamnoides, Allium sativum, Azadirachta indica, Asparagus racemosus, Morus alba, Citrus aurantium, Phyllanthus emblica, Vitis vinifera, Garcinia cambogia, Panax quinquefolius, Aloe vera, Vitis vinifera
α-amylase inhibitionDillenia indica, Phaseolus vulgaris, Taraxacum officinale, Garcinia cambogia, Vaccinium arctostaphylos, Azadirachta indica
Insulin receptor agonism/similar effectMomordica charantia (mcIRBP, polypeptide-p), Allium sativum (allicin), Urtica dioica, Salvia officinalis, Citrus aurantium
DPP-IV inhibitionTrigonella foenum-graecum (trigonelline), Glycyrrhiza glabra, Salvia officinalis, Citrus aurantium
SGLT inhibitionTrigonella foenum-graecum (trigonelline), Morus alba (DNJ), Citrus aurantium
Antioxidant/Anti-inflammatoryVitis vinifera, Sambucus nigra, Rosa canina, Spinacia oleracea, Lavandula angustifolia, Achillea millefolium, Thymus vulgaris, Fragaria ananassa, Phyllanthus emblica, Asparagus officinalis, Artemisia absinthium
β-cell regeneration/insulin secretionPueraria lobata, Sambucus nigra, Allium sativum, Salvia officinalis, Citrus aurantium, Agrimonia eupatoria, Artemisia absinthium
Miscellaneous (hepatic glucose regulation, lipid metabolism)Cichorium intybus (hepatic effect), Garcinia cambogia (ATP citrate lyase), Cynara scolymus (lipid/glucose), Aloe vera (GLUT4), Hippophae rhamnoides
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trasca, D.M.; Dop, D.; Stoica, G.-A.; Adrian, N.S.; Carmen, N.E.; Văruț, R.M.; Singer, C.E. The Antidiabetic Activity of Wild-Growing and Cultivated Medicinal Plants Used in Romania for Diabetes Mellitus Management: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18071035

AMA Style

Trasca DM, Dop D, Stoica G-A, Adrian NS, Carmen NE, Văruț RM, Singer CE. The Antidiabetic Activity of Wild-Growing and Cultivated Medicinal Plants Used in Romania for Diabetes Mellitus Management: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review. Pharmaceuticals. 2025; 18(7):1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18071035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trasca, Diana Maria, Dalia Dop, George-Alin Stoica, Niculescu Stefan Adrian, Niculescu Elena Carmen, Renata Maria Văruț, and Cristina Elena Singer. 2025. "The Antidiabetic Activity of Wild-Growing and Cultivated Medicinal Plants Used in Romania for Diabetes Mellitus Management: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review" Pharmaceuticals 18, no. 7: 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18071035

APA Style

Trasca, D. M., Dop, D., Stoica, G.-A., Adrian, N. S., Carmen, N. E., Văruț, R. M., & Singer, C. E. (2025). The Antidiabetic Activity of Wild-Growing and Cultivated Medicinal Plants Used in Romania for Diabetes Mellitus Management: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review. Pharmaceuticals, 18(7), 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18071035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop