Next Article in Journal
Advances in Canine Anesthesia: Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Predicting Propofol Plasma Profiles in Canines with Hepatic Impairment
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Anthraquinone Derivatives and Their Complexes with Metal Ions with Anticancer Activity: Structure/Redox and Chelation Activity Correlations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electroporation with Calcium or Bleomycin: First Application in an In Vivo Uveal Melanoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Pharmaceutical Science in Electrochemotherapy: A Tribute to Prof. Jolanta Saczko

by
Nina Rembiałkowska
1,* and
Julita Kulbacka
1,2
1
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 211A, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
2
State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Department of Immunology and Bioelectrochemistry, Santariškių 5, 08410 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(12), 1718; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17121718
Submission received: 12 December 2024 / Accepted: 17 December 2024 / Published: 19 December 2024
This Special Issue is dedicated to the memory of Professor Jolanta Saczko (1964–2023), a remarkable leader whose guidance and dedication were instrumental in advancing electroporation-based research in Poland. As the head of our pioneering team, Prof. J. Saczko was vital in fostering groundbreaking studies that laid the foundation for introducing and applying electrochemotherapy in the country. Her efforts in supporting innovative research initiatives and building collaborative networks have significantly shaped the landscape of this therapeutic field, enabling the implementation of electrochemotherapy as a clinical practice in Poland.
Prof. J. Saczko, who served as a Guest Editor for this Special Issue until her passing in 2023, was a visionary leader and mentor. As the Head of the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology at the Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, she inspired countless students and colleagues with her scientific rigor, dedication, and compassion. Her medical biochemistry and molecular biology work advanced our understanding of cellular responses to therapies and paved the way for novel treatment modalities.
In this Special Issue of Pharmaceuticals, we present five original articles that explore the most recent advancements in pharmaceutical application within the framework of electrochemotherapy. The studies range from in vitro experiments to in vivo investigations, encompassing topics such as gene electrotransfer and the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. This collection is a testament to the continued evolution of pharmaceutical sciences in enhancing the efficacy of electrochemotherapy.
Electrochemotherapy (ECT), which combines electroporation (EP) with standard anticancer agents like bleomycin and cisplatin [1,2,3], is a promising method for triggering additional drug transport pathways into cells. The well-known ECT protocol, following European Standard Operating Procedures (ESOPE), involves applying a burst of 8 × 100 µs, 1 Hz utilizing pulsed electric field (PEF) pulses for targeted drug delivery in cancer removal [4,5,6,7,8,9]. ECT has shown efficacy in treating superficial and deep-seated tumors, including melanoma, breast, liver, and pancreatic tumors [10,11,12,13,14,15].
Electroporation, also called electropermeabilization, is a biophysical technique that transiently increases the permeability of cell membranes under the influence of intense electrical pulses [4,16]. This method has been extensively applied to various cell types, including human, animal, and plant cells, both in vitro and in vivo [17,18,19,20,21] [Contribution 1, Contribution 2]. Creating transient nanoscale pores in the lipid bilayer facilitates the uptake of molecules such as drugs, DNA, RNA, and ions [22,23] [Contribution 3]. Electroporation can be reversible or irreversible (IRE) depending on the intensity and duration of the applied electrical pulses [24,25].
Reversible electroporation (EP) allows the cell membrane to reseal after treatment, maintaining cell viability [26,27]. Electroporation, the transient permeabilization of cell membranes using electrical pulses, has emerged as a powerful tool in pharmaceutical and medical science and therapeutic innovation. Its application in electrochemotherapy combines targeted drug delivery with localized electric fields, offering enhanced efficacy for treating resistant malignancies while minimizing systemic toxicity. Used in ECT, cytotoxic agents are usually impermeant in the cells. Bleomycin, a hydrophilic drug with high intrinsic cytotoxicity, is one of the most commonly employed chemotherapeutic agents in ECT, followed by cisplatin [28,29,30]. These drugs penetrate cells more effectively after electroporation, leading to selective tumor cell death without significantly damaging surrounding tissues [24,31].
In contrast, IRE leads to colossal cell membrane damage and subsequent cell lysis. However, using IRE makes this method a promising minimally invasive tissue ablation technique [32,33,34,35] and offers more protocol flexibility and less standardization, including nanosecond bursts of pulses [16,36].
While the standard ESOPE protocol employs eight microsecond-long pulses and is widely used in electrochemotherapy, it faces some limitations. These include non-uniform effects on tissue, the risk of thermal damage, and restricted selectivity, particularly in heterogeneous tumor environments. Moreover, the fixed parameters of ESOPE are not readily adaptable to optimize therapeutic outcomes for diverse cancer models. In contrast, nanosecond pulses offer greater flexibility in modulating amplitude, minimize thermal effects, target subcellular structures, and reduce damage to healthy tissues, allowing for effective ECT within larger tumor volumes while remaining within the reversible electroporation range [9,37]. Furthermore, the frequency dependence of tissue impedance emphasizes the suitability of higher-frequency pulses for treating heterogeneous structures [38].
The effectiveness of electroporation is influenced by key parameters, including the duration of pulses (milliseconds, microseconds, or nanoseconds), the total number of pulses delivered, the frequency at which they are applied, the intensity of the electric field, and the configuration of the pulse waveform, whether monopolar or bipolar [3,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Each factor must be carefully optimized to achieve the desired biological effect while minimizing unintended damage. Adjusting these parameters allows for precise control over the electroporation process, tailoring it to specific applications, whether intracellular drug delivery, gene transfer, or cell fusion. It was noticed that different cancer cell types display varying susceptibilities to pulsed electric fields, necessitating optimization of treatment protocols [46].
Furthermore, overcoming the reduced efficacy of chemotherapeutics and the growing issue of drug resistance in cancer therapy underscores the importance of combination treatments. Some resistance mechanisms can be overcome by incorporating drugs with distinct mechanisms of action. In addition to classic ECT agents like bleomycin and cisplatin, new combinations with metformin, vinorelbine, and Dp44mT are being explored to enhance therapeutic outcomes and target resistant cancer cell populations [47]. However, new solutions that could overcome drug resistance are still being sought. In recent years, calcium ion-assisted electroporation (CaEP) has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional ECT, where conventional cytostatics have been replaced by commonly available calcium chloride (CaCl2) solutions [48,49], demonstrating effectiveness in preclinical and clinical studies [Contribution 4, Contribution 5] [50].
The adaptability and efficacy of electroporation make it a critical tool in developing advanced therapeutic strategies, particularly for cancers with limited treatment options. Its combination with emerging agents and optimization for specific tumor profiles offers a pathway to more effective and personalized oncology therapies.

Author Contributions

N.R. was a significant contributor, and J.K. contributed to this Editorial. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We extend our heartfelt gratitude to all the team members from the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology who had the privilege of being mentored and cared for by Jolanta Saczko. Her unwavering support, guidance, and dedication have left an indelible mark on our professional and personal journeys.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions:

  • Sauer N; Szlasa W; Szewczyk A; Novickij V; Saczko J; Baczyńska D; Daczewska M; Kulbacka J. Effects of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field on Immune Checkpoint Receptors in Melanoma Cells. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1362. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16101362.
  • Anastasova, R.; Fiorentzis, M.; Liu, H.; Dalbah, S.; Bechrakis, N.E.; Seitz, B.; Berchner-Pfannschmidt, U.; Tsimpaki, T. Electroporation with Calcium or Bleomycin: First Application in an In Vivo Uveal Melanoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Model. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070905.
  • Urbanskas, E.; Jakštys, B.; Venckus, J.; Malakauskaitė, P.; Šatkauskienė, I.; Morkvėnaitė-Vilkončienė, I.; Šatkauskas, S. Interplay between Electric Field Strength and Number of Short-Duration Pulses for Efficient Gene Electrotransfer. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070825.
  • Bieżuńska-Kusiak, K.; Kulbacka, J.; Choromańska, A.; Rembiałkowska, N.; Michel, O.; Saczko, J. Evaluation of the Anticancer Activity of Calcium Ions Introduced into Human Breast Adenocarcinoma Cells MCF-7/WT and MCF-7/DOX by Electroporation. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16060809.
  • Radzevičiūtė-Valčiukė, E.; Želvys, A.; Mickevičiūtė, E.; Gečaitė, J.; Zinkevičienė, A.; Malyško-Ptašinskė, V.; Kašėta, V.; Novickij, J.; Ivaškienė, T.; Novickij, V. Calcium Electrochemotherapy for Tumor Eradication and the Potential of High-Frequency Nanosecond Protocols. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1083. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16081083.

References

  1. Kotnik, T.; Kramar, P.; Pucihar, G.; Miklavcic, D.; Tarek, M. Cell membrane electroporation—Part 1: The phenomenon. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2012, 28, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gehl, J. Drug and gene electrotransfer in cancer therapy. In Somatic Genome Manipulation: Advances, Methods, and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 3–15. ISBN 9781493923892. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rembiałkowska, N.; Dubińska-Magiera, M.; Sikora, A.; Szlasa, W.; Szewczyk, A.; Czapor-Irzabek, H.; Daczewska, M.; Saczko, J.; Kulbacka, J. Doxorubicin, assisted by microsecond electroporation, promotes irreparable morphological alternations in sensitive and resistant human breast adenocarcinoma cells. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Marty, M.; Sersa, G.; Garbay, J.R.; Gehl, J.; Collins, C.G.; Snoj, M.; Billard, V.; Geertsen, P.F.; Larkin, J.O.; Miklavcic, D.; et al. Electrochemotherapy—An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study. Eur. J. Cancer Suppl. 2006, 4, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mir, L.M. Electroporation-based gene therapy: Recent evolution in the mechanism description and technology developments. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1121, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Perri, F.; Longo, F.; Fusco, R.; D’alessio, V.; Aversa, C.; Pavone, E.; Pontone, M.; Marciano, M.L.; Villano, S.; Franco, P.; et al. Electrochemotherapy as a first-line treatment in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx pdl-1 negative and/or with evident contraindication to immunotherapy: A randomized multicenter controlled trial. Cancers 2021, 13, 2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vižintin, A.; Marković, S.; Ščančar, J.; Miklavčič, D. Electroporation with nanosecond pulses and bleomycin or cisplatin results in efficient cell kill and low metal release from electrodes. Bioelectrochemistry 2021, 140, 107798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tunikowska, J.; Antończyk, A.; Rembiałkowska, N.; Jóźwiak, Ł.; Novickij, V.; Kulbacka, J. The first application of nanoelectrochemotherapy in feline oral malignant melanoma treatment—Case study. Animals 2020, 10, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Radzevičiūtė, E.; Malyško-Ptašinskė, V.; Kulbacka, J.; Rembiałkowska, N.; Novickij, J.; Girkontaitė, I.; Novickij, V. Nanosecond electrochemotherapy using bleomycin or doxorubicin: Influence of pulse amplitude, duration, and burst frequency. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 148, 108251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rolong, A.; Davalos, R.V.; Rubinsky, B. History of Electroporation. In Irreversible Electroporation in Clinical Practice; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 13–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Campana, L.G.; Mocellin, S.; Basso, M.; Puccetti, O.; De Salvo, G.L.; Chiarion-Sileni, V.; Vecchiato, A.; Corti, L.; Rossi, C.R.; Nitti, D. Bleomycin-based electrochemotherapy: Clinical outcome from a single institution’s experience with 52 patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009, 16, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Milicevic, S.; Cemazar, M.; Ivancic, A.K.; Gasljevic, G.; Bosnjak, M.; Sersa, G.; Peric, B. Electrochemotherapy of Melanoma Cutaneous Metastases in Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Falk, H.; Lambaa, S.; Johannesen, H.H.; Wooler, G.; Venzo, A.; Gehl, J. Electrochemotherapy and calcium electroporation inducing a systemic immune response with local and distant remission of tumors in a patient with malignant melanoma—A case report. Acta Oncol. 2017, 56, 1126–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rudno-Rudzińska, J.; Kielan, W.; Guziński, M.; Płochocki, M.; Kulbacka, J. The First Study of Irreversible Electroporation with Calcium Ions and Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Di Prata, C.; Mascherini, M.; Ross, A.M.; Silvestri, B.; Kis, E.; Odili, J.; Fabrizio, T.; Jones, R.P.; Kunte, C.; Orlando, A.; et al. Efficacy of Electrochemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients of Different Receptor Status: The INSPECT Experience. Cancers 2023, 15, 3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Breton, M.; Mir, L.M. Microsecond and nanosecond electric pulses in cancer treatments. Bioelectromagnetics 2012, 33, 106–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Neumann, E.; Schaefer-Ridder, M.; Wang, Y.; Hofschneider, P.H. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J. 1982, 1, 841–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pucihar, G.; Krmelj, J.; Reberšek, M.; Napotnik, T.B.; Miklavčič, D. Equivalent Pulse Parameters for Electroporation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 58, 3279–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mir, L.M.; Orlowski, S. Mechanisms of electrochemotherapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1999, 35, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yarmush, M.L.; Golberg, A.; Serša, G.; Kotnik, T.; Miklavčič, D. Electroporation-based technologies formedicine: Principles, Applications, and challenges. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 16, 295–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gehl, J. Electroporation for drug and gene delivery in the clinic: Doctors go electric. In Electroporation Protocols; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2008; Volume 423, pp. 351–359. [Google Scholar]
  22. Jaroszeski, M.J.; Heller, R.; Gilbert, R. Electrochemotherapy, Electrogenetherapy, and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Electrically Mediated Delivery of Molecules to Cells; University of South Florida Press: Tampa, FL, USA, 2000; ISBN 0896036065. [Google Scholar]
  23. Rols, M.P. Electropermeabilization, a physical method for the delivery of therapeutic molecules into cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2006, 1758, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Campana, L.G.; Valpione, S.; Falci, C.; Mocellin, S.; Basso, M.; Corti, L.; Balestrieri, N.; Marchet, A.; Rossi, C.R. The activity and safety of electrochemotherapy in persistent chest wall recurrence from breast cancer after mastectomy: A phase-II study. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012, 134, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Benevento, R.; Santoriello, A.; Perna, G.; Canonico, S. Electrochemotherapy of cutaneous metastastes frombreast cancer in elderly patients: A preliminary report. BMC Surg. 2012, 12, S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dev, S.B.; Rabussay, D.P.; Widera, G.; Hofmann, G.A. Medical applications of electroporation. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2000, 28, 206–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Weżgowiec, J.; Kulbacka, J.; Saczko, J.; Rossowska, J.; Chodaczek, G.; Kotulska, M. Biological effects inphotodynamic treatment combined with electropermeabilization in wild and drug resistant breast cancercells. Bioelectrochemistry 2018, 123, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Perrone, A.M.; Ravegnini, G.; Miglietta, S.; Argnani, L.; Ferioli, M.; De Crescenzo, E.; Tesei, M.; Di Stanislao, M.; Girolimetti, G.; Gasparre, G.; et al. Electrochemotherapy in Vulvar Cancer and Cisplatin Combined with Electroporation. Systematic Review and in Vitro Studies. Cancers 2021, 13, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Batista Napotnik, T.; Miklavčič, D. In vitro electroporation detection methods—An overview. Bioelectrochemistry 2018, 120, 166–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Waks, A.G.; Winer, E.P. Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2019, 321, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sersa, G.; Cufer, T.; Paulin, S.M.; Cemazar, M.; Snoj, M. Electrochemotherapy of chest wall breast cancer recurrence. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2012, 38, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Edhemovic, I.; Gadzijev, E.M.; Brecelj, E.; Miklavcic, D.; Kos, B.; Zupanic, A.; Mali, B.; Jarm, T.; Pavliha, D.; Marcan, M.; et al. Electrochemotherapy: A New Technological Approach in Treatment of Metastases in the Liver. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 10, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Girelli, R.; Prejanò, S.; Cataldo, I.; Corbo, V.; Martini, L.; Scarpa, A.; Claudio, B. Feasibility and safety of electrochemotherapy (ECT) in the pancreas: A pre-clinical investigation. Radiol. Oncol. 2015, 49, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Davalos, R.V.; Mir, L.M.; Rubinsky, B. Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rubinsky, B. Irreversible electroporation in medicine. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2007, 6, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nuccitelli, R.; Pliquett, U.; Chen, X.; Ford, W.; Swanson, R.J.; Beebe, S.J.; Kolb, J.F.; Schoenbach, K.H. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields cause melanomas to self-destruct. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 343, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rembiałkowska, N.; Kucharczyk, J.; Radzevičiūtė-Valčiukė, E.; Novickij, V.; Tonci, M.; Dündar, A.; Kulbacka, J.; Szlasa, W. Enhancing lung cancer growth inhibition with calcium ions: Role of mid- and high-frequency electric field pulses. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 181, 117691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bhonsle, S.P.; Arena, C.B.; Sweeney, D.C.; Davalos, R.V. Mitigation of impedance changes due to electroporation therapy using bursts of high-frequency bipolar pulses. Biomed. Eng. Online 2015, 14 (Suppl. S3), S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sundararajan, R. Nanosecond Electroporation: Another Look. Mol. Biotechnol. 2009, 41, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Beebe, S.J.; Blackmore, P.F.; White, J.; Joshi, R.P.; Schoenbach, K.H. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields modulate cell function through intracellular signal transduction mechanisms. Physiol. Meas. 2004, 25, 1077–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hall, E.H.; Schoenbach, K.H.; Beebe, S.J. Nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) induce direct electric field effects and biological effects on human colon carcinoma cells. DNA Cell Biol. 2005, 24, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vernier, P.T.; Sun, Y.; Marcu, L.; Salemi, S.; Craft, C.; Gundersen, M.A. Calcium bursts induced by nanosecond electric pulses. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 310, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gudvangen, E.; Kim, V.; Novickij, V.; Battista, F.; Pakhomov, A.G. Electroporation and cell killing by milli- to nanosecond pulses and avoiding neuromuscular stimulation in cancer ablation. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Novickij, V.; Rembiałkowska, N.; Szlasa, W.; Kulbacka, J. Does the shape of the electric pulse matter in electroporation? Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 958128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Novickij, V.; Staigvila, G.; Murauskas, A.; Rembialkowska, N.; Kulbacka, J.; Novickij, J. High Frequency Bipolar Electro-porator with Double-Crowbar Circuit for Load-Independent Forming of Nanosecond Pulses. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gianulis, E.C.; Labib, C.; Saulis, G.; Novickij, V.; Pakhomova, O.N.; Pakhomov, A.G. Selective susceptibility to nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) across different human cell types. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 1741–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rembiałkowska, N.; Novickij, V.; Radzevičiūtė-Valčiukė, E.; Mickevičiūtė, E.; Gajewska-Naryniecka, A.; Kulbacka, J. Susceptibility of various human cancer cell lines to nanosecond and microsecond range electrochemotherapy: Feasibility of multi-drug cocktails. Int. J. Pharm. 2023, 646, 123485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Falk, H.; Matthiessen, L.; Wooler, G.; Gehl, J. Calcium electroporation for treatment of cutaneous metastases; a randomized double-blinded phase II study, comparing the effect of calcium electroporation with electrochemotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2017, 57, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Frandsen, S.K.; Gibot, L.; Madi, M.; Gehl, J.; Rols, M.-P. Calcium electroporation: Evidence for differential effects in normal and malignant cell lines, evaluated in a 3D spheroid model. PLoS ONE. 2015, 10, e0144028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Frandsen, S.K.; Vissing, M.; Gehl, J. A Comprehensive Review of Calcium Electroporation—A Novel Cancer Treatment Modality. Cancers 2020, 12, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rembiałkowska, N.; Kulbacka, J. Advances in Pharmaceutical Science in Electrochemotherapy: A Tribute to Prof. Jolanta Saczko. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17121718

AMA Style

Rembiałkowska N, Kulbacka J. Advances in Pharmaceutical Science in Electrochemotherapy: A Tribute to Prof. Jolanta Saczko. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(12):1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17121718

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rembiałkowska, Nina, and Julita Kulbacka. 2024. "Advances in Pharmaceutical Science in Electrochemotherapy: A Tribute to Prof. Jolanta Saczko" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 12: 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17121718

APA Style

Rembiałkowska, N., & Kulbacka, J. (2024). Advances in Pharmaceutical Science in Electrochemotherapy: A Tribute to Prof. Jolanta Saczko. Pharmaceuticals, 17(12), 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17121718

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop