Next Article in Journal
Effects of Short-Term Treatment with α-Lipoic Acid on Neuropathic Pain and Biomarkers of DNA Damage in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus
Next Article in Special Issue
Fluoroquinolones and Biofilm: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Potential Inhibitors of Histone Deacetylase 6 Through Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Approach: Implications in Neurodegenerative Diseases
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Antibacterial Mechanisms and Clinical Impact of Sitafloxacin

Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(11), 1537; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17111537
by Elian M. A. Kuhn 1,2, Levy A. Sominsky 3,4,5, Marco Chittò 1, Edward M. Schwarz 3 and T. Fintan Moriarty 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(11), 1537; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17111537
Submission received: 14 October 2024 / Revised: 9 November 2024 / Accepted: 12 November 2024 / Published: 16 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fluoroquinolones)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript needs to be improved:

1. More figures (especially descriptions of antibacterial mechanisms) and comparison tables should be added.

2. Studies on antibacterial activity for the studies highlighted in this review should be highlighted and figures added.

3. How is the ability to resist drug-resistant strains of bacteria? In addition, different factors affecting treatment regimens should be discussed.

Author Response

PLease see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Some of my comments/questions are highlighted by yellow.

 

This review can be considered for publication only after taking care of  its  main weak points, listed below according to the order they were provided by the authors.

The authors claim that they discuss the structural characterization, which is an essential tool for the antibiotics activity. However, this info is not provided in this review. 

 

In fact, this manuscript does not provide any structural information. It actually describes only the chemical positioning of specific chemical moieties, hence does not lead to the understanding of the antibacterial mechanisms and the consequent clinical Impact of Sitafloxacin.

 

Indeed, the authors enlighten the chemical composition, and the positioning of the various moieties of the compound, but not its 3D structure. Thus, the structures of all compounds are determined by single crystal X-Ray diffraction, used in a method called crystallography or by cryo EM. Hence, the authors should replace the word structure by chemical-positioning throughout, including in their concluding summary sentences, and shed light of all expected and obtained properties by the addition of the various chemical moieties discussed in this manuscript.

 

Examples:  The aim of this review is to summarize the chemical-positioning-based mechanisms, activity, resistance profile, and likely future clinical potential of sitafloxacin.                                             In fact, all of the words ‘chemical structure’ should be replaced by chemical composition or chemical positioning

Some specific points/questions

1. It is approved and used in Japan why only in Japan?

2. For only some diseases Why only for these diseases?

3. The ms. says: however, it is also used for ……where? And also: Is it used in ….. illegally?

4. The ms. says: The distinction between the different generations is not clearly defined or clinically important. Prominent examples of these latter generation…. are levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) [1].

Can such generalization be made based of only 2 examples?

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please see the report attached as pdf file. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop