Abstract
Background: The expression of human germline genes is restricted to the germ cells of the gonads, which produce sperm and eggs. The germline genes involved in testis development and potentially activated in cancer cells are known as cancer-testis (CT) genes. These genes are potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers, as well as drivers of the oncogenic process. CT genes can be reactivated by treatment with drugs that demethylate DNA. The majority of the existing literature on CT gene activation focuses on X-chromosome-produced CT genes. We tested the hypothesis that epigenetic landscape changes, such as DNA methylation, can alter several CT gene expression profiles in cancer and germ cells. Methods: Colon cancer (CC) cell lines were treated with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNMTi) 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine, or with the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) trichostatin A (TSA). The effects of these epigenetic treatments on the transcriptional activation of previously published CT genes (CTAG1A, SCP2D1, TKTL2, LYZL6, TEX33, and ACTRT1) and testis-specific genes (NUTM1, ASB17, ZSWIM2, ADAM2, and C10orf82) were investigated. Results: We found that treatment of CC cell lines with 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine or TSA correlated with activation of X-encoded CT genes and non-X-encoded CT genes in somatic (non-germline) cells. Conclusion: These findings confirm that a subset of CT genes can be regulated by hypomethylating drugs and subsequently provide a potential therapeutic target for cancer.
1. Introduction
Colon cancer (CC) is one of the top causes of mortality in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. CC typically affects older age groups; however, it has become more widespread among younger age groups in recent years [1]. It is the most prevalent cancer in men and the third most prevalent cancer in women in the Saudi population [2], and the highest incidence rates for men are found in Riyadh and Makkah [3]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a reliable early identification method and a good therapeutic target for CC. Towards these goals, much research has been conducted on different classes of antigens to identify potential cancer-specific biomarkers and cancer treatments.
Cancer-testis (CT) antigens are examples of such molecules. In healthy adult tissues, CT antigens are only expressed in the germ cells of the testis; however, they are expressed in multiple types of cancers [2]. Therefore, CT antigens are extremely attractive immunotherapeutic targets due to their limited expression pattern and immunogenic character [2,4].
The expression of many CT antigen genes is controlled by the amount of methylation in the promotor regions of their DNA. When the amount of methylation is low, gene expression increases. Consequently, the expression of multiple CT antigens is upregulated in different cancers due to carcinogenesis-related genome-wide hypomethylation [4,5]. More importantly, the expression of CT genes can be increased in cancer cells by treatment with a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNMTi); this is especially so in CT genes on the X chromosome [X-CT], where half of all known CT genes are located [4]. Almatrafi et al. (2014) showed that several CT genes are silenced by the hypermethylation of CpG islands and activated by DNA hypomethylating agents [4], and other studies have revealed a similar tendency for different CT genes [1,5,6]. For example, Colemon et al. (2020) observed a clear relationship between the methylation levels of MAGE-A genes and their expression in several cancer tissues [6]. Similarly, others observed that expression of the NYESO-1 gene is increased by promoter hypomethylation in non-small cell lung cancer [7] and acute myeloid leukemia [8]. Hence, DNMTis have the potential to upregulate the expression of CT antigens and enhance the effect of immunotherapy [4,5]. For example, a DNMTi could be added to a clinical cancer immunotherapy treatment protocol.
CT gene expression is influenced not only by promoter methylation status but also by chromatin structure. Post-transcriptional changes that result in chromatin remodeling require histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases (HDAC). HDAC inhibitors (HDACis) appear to have anticancer activity and have entered clinical trials, indicating that they may contribute to a more individualized approach to cancer therapy [4,9].
A novel set of CT genes identified using in silico methods has been experimentally confirmed in cancer cell lines [10,11,12]. Recently, the expression of some of these genes was examined in samples from 20 Saudi patients with CC, and the results were compared to those from matched normal colon (NC) samples [2]. The genes CTAG1A, SCP2D1, TKTL2, LYZL6, TEX33, and ACTRT1 were found to be expressed in the different CC tissue samples but not in any of the NC tissue samples, and most of these genes are located on autosomal chromosomes. This suggests that the six genes could be examined as potential CC markers. In addition, the genes NUTM1, ASB17, ZSWIM2, ADAM2, and C10orf82 were not expressed in the CC and NC samples; therefore, they were categorized as testis-specific genes because they were only expressed in normal testis [2].
The hypothesis of this study was that epigenetic mechanisms, specifically DNA methylation, can regulate the expression of previously published CT genes or testis-specific genes in CC cell lines. In the current study, the effect of epigenetic treatments, namely the addition of a DNMTi and an HDACi, on the transcriptional activation of previously published CT genes was investigated. Specifically, CC cell lines were treated with the DNMTi 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (5-aza-CdR) or the HDACi trichostatin A (TSA). The results of this work further our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of these genes in CC tissues.
2. Results
All CT genes that have been studied to date, which are mostly X-CT genes, require hypermethylation of their regulatory DNA sequences in order to be silenced. However, they can be activated by the hypomethylating agent 5-aza-CdR or/and by the HDACi TSA [4,10,11,12]. Given that the upregulation of immunogenic CT antigens might be useful in clinical settings, we aimed to determine whether recently found autosomal-encoded CT genes and testis-specific genes [3] were affected by a similar DNA hypermethylation silencing mechanism.
2.1. Effects of 5-aza-CdR and TSA on CT Gene Expression Profiles in CC Cell Lines
First, to investigate the effect of 5-aza-CdR on the expression of CT genes, the expression profiles of SCP2D1, CTAG1A, LYZL6, TKTL2, ACTRT1, and TEX33 were examined. CTAG1A and ACTRT1 are localized on the X chromosome, while the remaining genes are autosomes. Due to the dissolution of the 5-aza-CdR drug, DMSO-treated cells were utilized in this study. Furthermore, untreated cells served as negative controls. The normal testis served as a positive control for primer efficiency, while the ACTB gene was employed to assess the quality of the cDNA.
As controls for hypermethylation-regulated CT genes, two previously identified X-CT genes, MAGE-A4 and MAGE-B1, were selected and almost remained transcriptionally silent in the Caco-2 and HCT116 cell lines. To examine whether a reduction in DNA methyltransferase activity can activate the selected CT genes, the two cell lines were treated with three doses of 5-aza-CdR (1, 5, and 10 μM) for 48 or 72 h. Following the 5-aza-CdR treatment, cDNA was synthesized, RT-PCR was performed, and the products were analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis.
MAGE-A4 and MAGE-B1 were activated from a state of silence by a relatively low concentration of 5-aza-CdR, particularly in HCT116 cells. The novel X-CT CTAG1A gene was similarly activated with low levels of 5-aza-CdR in both cell types, while the expression of ACTRT1 was not activated (1 µM; Figure 1). SCP2D1, a novel autosomal-encoded CT gene, was also activated only in Caco-2 cells with a slightly higher 5-aza-CdR dosage (5 µM; Figure 1). However, even at high concentrations of 5-aza-CdR in both cell lines, the transcription of LYZL6, TKTL2, and TEX33 remained silenced (10 µM; Figure 1).
Figure 1.
The effects of 5-aza-CdR treatments on CT gene expression profiles in the Caco-2 and HCT116 cancer cell lines. The expression of SCP2D1, CTAG1A, LYZL6, TKTL2, ACTRT1, and TEX33 genes is shown on agarose gels following treatment with various doses of 5-aza-CdR for 48 h (left column of each cell) or 72 h (right column of each cell). Untreated Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were utilized as controls to compare the expression of CT genes with treated cells, and a testis sample served as a positive control for primer efficiency. The control Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were treated with DMSO, as DMSO was the solvent used in the 5-aza-CdR solution. The positive control for the cDNA samples is the expression of the ACTB gene. The official names of the genes are written to the right of the agarose gel images, and the location of each gene on the chromosomal is written in parentheses on the right. Above each lane, the particular concentration of 5-aza-CdR (1, 5, and 10 μM) is written.
Next, qRT-PCR was performed to determine the levels of MAGE-A4, MAGE-B1, and CTAG1A mRNA in the Caco-2 and HCT116 cell lines following 72 h of treatment with 10 µM 5-aza-CdR. The expression level of each gene was measured in cells treated with 5-aza-CdR or DMSO. Then, the mean and standard deviation of the expression of each gene in each sample was calculated. The results indicate that the MAGE-A4, MAGE-B1, and CTAG1A mRNA levels were higher in cells treated with 5-aza-CdR than in cells treated with DMSO (Figure 2). Therefore, the qRT-PCR results correlate with the RT-PCR results, which are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 2.
qRT-PCR analysis of MAGE-A4, MAGE-B1, and CTAG1A expression in Caco-2 and HCT116 cells following treatment with 10 µM 5-aza-CdR for 72 h. The bar charts illustrate the expression of MAGE-B1, MAGE-A4, and CTAG1A before and after 5-aza-CdR treatment in Caco-2 cells (upper panel) and HCT116 cells (lower panel). The expression levels were normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean for three replicates for each gene. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001.
Second, Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were treated with 100 nM of TSA for 48 h to examine whether histone deacetylation was involved in the silencing of hypermethylation-independent genes (LYZL6, TKTL2, ACTRT1, and TEX33) and other novel CT genes. TSA was found to activate the expression of X-CT MAGE-A4 in the Caco-2 and HCT116 cells and the expression of X-CT MAGE-B1 in the HCT116 cells only. Surprisingly, LYZL6 and TEX33 remained firmly silenced under these transcription-inducing conditions (Figure 3). However, TKTL2 transcription was activated only in HCT116 cells, while ACTRT1 transcription was activated in both cell lines. In contrast, SCP2D1 expression was induced in both cells; however, CTAG1A expression was stimulated only in the Caco-2 cells (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
The effects of TSA treatments on CT gene expression profiles in the Caco-2 and HCT116 cancer cell lines. The expression of SCP2D1, CTAG1A, LYZL6, TKTL2, ACTRT1, and TEX33 genes is shown on agarose gels following treatment with 100 nM of TSA for 48 h. The testis sample served as a positive control for primer efficiency. Control Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were treated with DMSO, as DMSO was the solvent utilized in the TSA solution. The positive control for the cDNA samples is the expression of the ACTB gene. The official names of the genes are written to the right of the agarose gel images, and the location of each gene on the chromosomal is written in parentheses on the right.
As a next step, qRT-PCR was performed to determine MAGE-A4, MAGE-B1, CTAG1A, TKTL2, SCP2D1, and ACTRT1 mRNA levels in Caco-2 cells (Figure 4) and HCT116 cells (Figure 5) following 48 h of treatment with 100 nM of the TSA drug. The results indicate that MAGE-A4, MAGE-B1, CTAG1A, SCP2D1, TKTL2, and ACTRT1 were more highly expressed in cells treated with TSA than in cells treated with DMSO (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Consequently, the qRT-PCR results correspond to the RT-PCR results, which are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 4.
qRT-PCR analysis of MAGE-A4, MAGE-B1, CTAG1A, TKTL2, SCP2D1, and ACTRT1 expression in Caco-2 cells following treatment with 100 nM TSA for 48 h. The bar charts illustrate the expression of MAGE-A4, MAGE-B1, CTAG1A, SCP2D1, TKTL2, and ACTRT1 before and after TSA treatment in Caco-2 and HCT116 cells. The expression levels were normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean for three replicates for each gene. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 5.
qRT-PCR analysis of MAGE-A4, MAGE-B1, CTAG1A, TKTL2 and SCP2D1 expression in HCT116 cells following treatment with 100 nM TSA for 48 h. The bar charts illustrate the expression of MAGE-A4, MAGE-B1, CTAG1A, TKTL2 and SCP2D1 before and after TSA treatment in Caco-2 and HCT116 cells. The expression levels were normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean for three replicates for each gene. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001.
2.2. Effects of 5-aza-CdR and TSA on Testis-Specific Gene Expression Profiles in CC Cell Lines
In this study, the autosomal testis-specific genes ADAM2, ASB17, C10orf82, ZSWIM2, and NUTM1 were validated to examine whether a reduction in DNA methyltransferase activity can activate these genes. Therefore, Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were treated with 5-aza-CdR. The expression of these genes remained silenced at all three doses of 5-aza-CdR (Figure 6). Additionally, to examine whether histone deacetylation was involved in the silencing of hypermethylation-independent genes, Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were treated with TSA, as described in Section 2.2. Remarkably, ADAM2, ASB17, C10orf82, ZSWIM2, and NUTM1 remained firmly silenced under these transcription-inducing conditions (Figure 7).
Figure 6.
The effects of 5-aza-CdR treatments on testis-specific gene expression profiles in the Caco-2 and HCT116 cancer cell lines. The expression of ADAM2, ASB17, C10orf82, ZSWIM2, and NUTM1 genes is shown on agarose gels following treatment with various doses of 5-aza-CdR for 48 h (left column of each cell) or 72 h (right column of each cell). Untreated Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were used as controls to compare the expression of CT genes with treated cells, and a testis sample served as a positive control for primer efficiency. The control Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were treated with DMSO, as DMSO was the solvent used in the 5-aza-CdR solution. The positive control for the cDNA samples is the expression of the ACTB gene. The official names of the genes are written to the right of the agarose gel images, and the location of each gene on the chromosomal is written in parentheses on the right. Above each lane, the particular concentration of 5-aza-CdR (1, 5, and 10 μM) is written.
Figure 7.
The effects of TSA treatments on testis-specific gene expression profiles in the Caco-2 and HCT116 cancer cell lines. The expression of ADAM2, ASB17, C10orf82, ZSWIM2, and NUTM1 genes is shown on agarose gels following treatment with 100 nM TSA for 48 h. The testis sample served as a positive control for primer efficiency. Control Caco-2 and HCT116 cells were treated with DMSO, as DMSO was the solvent utilized in the TSA solution. The positive control for the cDNA samples is the expression of the ACTB gene. The official names of the genes are written to the right of the agarose gel images, and the location of each gene on the chromosomal is written in parentheses on the right.
2.3. Gene–Gene Interaction Network
The gene–gene interaction network of the CT genes was constructed to analyze the gene functions using the GeneMANIA database. The GeneMANIA online analysis tool showed that SCP2D1, CTAG1A, LYZL6, TKTL2, ACTRT1, and TEX33 are co-expressed with or are targets of 20 other genes: CTAG2, RGS11, PRAMEF2, MAGEA2B, PTH, GUCY2C, SPANXA1, MAGEA9, GLYATL1, TACR3, C1orf61, FAM133A, VHLL, PCDH15, HOXA2, FFAR1, MAGEA4, EDN3, TTN, and MYRFL (colored purple in Figure 8). The analysis also indicated that the relationship network of these genes was associated with co-expression. The central node representing the CT gene members was surrounded by 20 nodes, indicating genes that are strongly linked to the CT genes in terms of co-expression.
Figure 8.
The gene–gene interaction network for the CT genes (SCP2D1, CTAG1A, LYZL6, TKTL2, ACTRT1, and TEX33) generated using the GeneMANIA database. Each central node represents a CT gene (shown as circles). The 20 most frequently neighboring genes found to be strongly linked to the CT genes are shown. The interactions between the CT genes and the other genes are shown as edges (shown as lines).
3. Discussion
The current treatment strategies for CC are restricted to surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, which are ineffective for patients with advanced recurrences and metastases, resulting in poor prognoses [13]. However, an immunotherapy that utilizes human immune cells to detect tumor-associated antigens is emerging as one of the most promising therapies for CC patients [14]. For cancer immunotherapy to be effective, it is necessary to identify an appropriate therapeutic target. Due to their high immunogenicity, restricted expression profile in normal somatic tissues, and widespread expression in different cancers, CT antigens are regarded as potential targets for cancer immunotherapy [15,16].
It has been shown that treating cancers with drugs that deregulate epigenetic silencing, such as those that reduce DNA methylation can result in the expression of CT antigen genes in cancer cells [17,18,19]. However, the epigenetic control mechanisms responsible for CT gene silencing have so far only been identified for a select few X-CT genes, all of which are triggered by hypomethylating drugs. In this study, we investigated the epigenetic control mediated by clinically significant indicators and demonstrated that a hypomethylating drug and an HDACi do not activate a subclass of CT genes that includes LYZL6 and TEX33. These findings suggest that there is a wide range of mechanisms governing CT gene regulation. This has repercussions for the selection of CT genes for targeted therapies. Additionally, mechanistic regulatory pathways may reveal subclasses of CT genes that are co-regulated, which has significance for further research on these genes as biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets.
Furthermore, it has been revealed that some CT genes are essential for the growth of cancer cells. Inactivating these genes has the potential to reduce the impact of cancers and make other treatment techniques more effective by decreasing the proliferation-mediated burden of cancers. Interestingly, 5-aza-CdR treatment enhanced dose-dependent CTAG1A expression in the Caco-2 and HCT116 cell lines, suggesting that DNA hypomethylation is vital in the regulation of CTAG1A expression. These outcomes are consistent with those reported previously [7,8]. In contrast, the HDACi TSA triggered CTAG1A expression in Caco-2 cells but not in HCT116 cells at a similar dose, showing that not all cancers react to the same treatment.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Human CC Cell Line Sources and Cultures
HCT116 and Caco-2 human CC cell lines were used in this study. They were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; CCL-247 and HTB-37, respectively; Manassas, VA, USA). These cell lines were cultured with ATCC-recommended dilutions and confluences in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 61965026) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific; A3160801). They were incubated in a humidified environment with 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
4.2. Treating Cell Lines with 5-aza-2′ Deoxycytidine (5-aza-CdR) or Trichostatin A (TSA)
The HCT116 and Caco-2 cells were treated with three doses of 5-aza-CdR (Sigma; A3656) at 1, 5, or 10 μM for 48 or 72 h. Every 24 h, 5-aza-CdR-containing medium was added. The times and concentrations were selected based on the results of a previous study [4]. In addition, other sets of HCT116 and Caco-2 cells were treated with 100 nM of TSA (Sigma, T1952) for 48 h.
4.3. Total RNA Isolation and Complementary DNA (cDNA) Synthesis from Cell Cultures
According to the manufacturer’s recommendations, the total RNA was isolated from approximately 5 × 106 cultured cells using the All Prep DNA/RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany; 80204). A Nano-Drop 8000 spectrophotometer was used to determine the concentration, purity, and quality of the isolated RNA molecule (Thermo Fisher Scientific; ND-8000-GL, Waltham, MA, USA). For each sample, 2 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) using a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems; 4368814), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA was then diluted 10 times and stored at −20 °C until required.
4.4. Primer Design and Setup for Reverse Transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)
All gene sequences were extracted from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), accessed on 1 June 2022. For each gene, intron-spanning primers were designed to eliminate false positives that could be caused by genomic DNA contamination. Manual and software methods were used to select the primers. Primer-BLAST software was used to design the RT-PCR primers (available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/), accessed on 1 June 2022. The primers were produced by Macrogen (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, South Korea) and were diluted in sterile distilled water to a final amount of 10 pmol (available at https://dna.macrogen.com/), accessed on 1 June 2022. The primer sequences for the RT-PCR genes are shown with their expected sizes in Table 1.
Table 1.
Sequences of the primers used in the RT-PCR and their estimated product sizes.
In a PCR tube, 10.5 μL of distilled water was combined with 12.5 μL of BioMix Red (BioLine, London, UK; BIO-25006), 1 μL of cDNA (100 ng), 0.5 μL of forward primer (10 pmol), and 0.5 μL of reverse primer (10 pmol). Each sample was amplified via a pre-denaturation step (5 min at 96 °C), followed by 40 cycles of a denaturation step (30 s at 96 °C), an annealing step (30 s at the temperature shown in Table 1, and an extension step (30 s at 72 °C). This was followed by a final extension step (5 min at 72 °C).
4.5. Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
The PCR products were run on 1% agarose gels (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; A9539), using a 1× TBE buffer, and stained with 0.5 g/mL ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich; 46067). The quality of the treated and untreated cDNA samples was determined using ACTB gene amplification. The size of each PCR product was determined by loading 3 μL of 100 bp DNA markers (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA; N0467).
4.6. Primer Design and Setup for Real Time Quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR)
For efficient qRT-PCR amplification, all primers were manually designed with amplicon sizes of about 180 bp. To prevent internal secondary structure formation, each primer was 20 nucleotides long and included 50–55% G/C. To prevent primer dimer formation, the forward and reverse primers had equal melting temperatures and lacked considerable complementarity at their 3’ ends. To confirm the specificity of the primers, a BLAST search was conducted. Stock primers were diluted with sterile distilled water to 10 pmol. The sequences of the commercially made primers are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Sequences of the primers used in the qRT-PCR and their estimated product sizes.
The qRT-PCR tests were established with the manufacturer-recommended iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA; 1725120). The volume was then adjusted to 10 μL by adding 5 µL of SYBR Green Supermix, 2 μL of cDNA (200 ng), 0.25 μL of each primer, and 2.5 μL of distilled water to a 96-well plate. Samples were amplified three times using a pre-denaturation step (30 s at 95 °C), followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 30 s of primer annealing at 60 °C, and 15 s of extension at 95 °C. A melting curve study was conducted after the 40 cycles were completed. GAPDH was employed as a positive control for the normalization of the qRT-PCR data. Each qRT-PCR was conducted using a QuantStudioTM 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Hercules, CA, USA).
4.7. Statistical Analysis
The qRT-PCR experiments were performed independently, two for each gene. The mean values and standard deviations were computed. GraphPad Prism version 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to identify significant differences in the outcomes. All p values were considered to be statistically significant (* p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001).
4.8. In Silico Analysis
A genetic interaction network of the CT genes and the functional associations was created using GeneMANIA tools (University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada). This was used to conduct a network analysis of common genes and to predict related genes [20].
5. Conclusions
The findings of this study demonstrate that the expression of some CT genes can be activated in CC cell lines by 5-aza-CdR and TSA agents. These epigenetic modulators play a crucial role in the transcriptional activation of these genes and represent possible components of future cancer immunotherapies. Additionally, the use of 5-aza-CdR and TSA in cancer vaccination therapies can be explored to improve the efficacy of this treatment modality. Additional research is necessary to determine the effects of 5-aza-CdR on protein levels at higher dosages when applied for longer durations and in combination with an HDACi.
Author Contributions
M.H.A.: project administration, experimental design, supervision, validation, and writing—original draft. T.M.A.: investigation and methodology. B.O.A.: investigation and software. A.M.A.: formal analysis and validation. A.F.A.: investigation and methodology. M.M.A.: sample collection. M.A.: provided clinical data and sample collection. A.S.: consultant. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by the National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, grant number 2-17-01-001-0069.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
| CT | Cancer-testis |
| DNMTi | DNA methyl-transferase inhibitor |
| HDACi | Histone deacetylase inhibitor |
| CC | Colon cancer |
| HDAC | Histone deacetylases |
| 5-aza-CdR | 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine |
| TSA | Trichostatin A |
| cDNA | Complementary DNA |
| RT-PCR | Reverse transcriptase PCR |
| qRT-PCR | Real time quantitative PCR |
References
- Rasool, M.; Pushparaj, P.N.; Karim, S. Overexpression of CXCL8 gene in Saudi colon cancer patients. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 6045–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Almutairi, M.H.; Alrubie, T.M.; Alamri, A.M.; Almutairi, B.O.; Alrefaei, A.F.; Arafah, M.M.; Alanazi, M.; Semlali, A. Cancer-Testis Gene Biomarkers Discovered in Colon Cancer Patients. Genes 2022, 13, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Almatroudi, A. The Incidence Rate of Colorectal Cancer in Saudi Arabia: An Observational Descriptive Epidemiological Analysis. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2020, 13, 977–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Almatrafi, A.; Feichtinger, J.; Vernon, E.G.; Escobar, N.G.; Wakeman, J.A.; Larcombe, L.D.; McFarlane, R.J. Identification of a class of human cancer germline genes with transcriptional silencing refractory to the hypomethylating drug 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Oncoscience 2014, 1, 745–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jakobsen, M.K.; Traynor, S.; Stæhr, M.; Duijf, P.G.; Nielsen, A.Y.; Terp, M.G.; Pedersen, C.B.; Guldberg, P.; Ditzel, H.J.; Gjerstorff, M.F. The Cancer/Testis Antigen Gene VCX2 Is Rarely Expressed in Malignancies but Can Be Epigenetically Activated Using DNA Methyltransferase and Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 584024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colemon, A.; Harris, T.M.; Ramanathan, S. DNA hypomethylation drives changes in MAGE-A gene expression resulting in alteration of proliferative status of cells. Genes Environ. 2020, 42, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chüeh, A.C.; Liew, M.-S.; Russell, P.A.; Walkiewicz, M.; Jayachandran, A.; Starmans, M.H.; Boutros, P.C.; Wright, G.; Barnett, S.A.; Mariadason, J.M.; et al. Promoter hypomethylation of NY-ESO-1, association with clinicopathological features and PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 74036–74048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Srivastava, P.; Paluch, B.E.; Matsuzaki, J.; James, S.R.; Collamat-Lai, G.; Blagitko-Dorfs, N.; Ford, L.A.; Naqash, R.; Lübbert, M.; Karpf, A.R.; et al. Induction of cancer testis antigen expression in circulating acute myeloid leukemia blasts following hypomethylating agent monotherapy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 12840–12856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caponigro, F.; Basile, M.; De Rosa, V.; Normanno, N. New Drugs in Cancer Therapy, National Tumor Institute, Naples, 17–18 June 2004. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2005, 16, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feichtinger, J.; Aldeailej, I.; Anderson, R.; Almutairi, M.; Almatrafi, M.; Alsiwiehri, N.; Griffiths, K.; Stuart, N.; Wakeman, J.A.; Larcombe, L.; et al. Meta-analysis of clinical data using human meiotic genes identifies a novel cohort of highly restricted cancer-specific marker genes. Oncotarget 2012, 3, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sammut, S.J.; Feichtinger, J.; Stuart, N.; Wakeman, J.A.; Larcombe, L.; McFarlane, R.J. A novel cohort of cancer-testis biomarker genes revealed through meta-analysis of clinical data sets. Oncoscience 2014, 1, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Feichtinger, J.; McFarlane, R.J.; Larcombe, L.D. CancerEST: A web-based tool for automatic meta-analysis of public EST data. Database 2014, 2014, bau024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aiello, P.; Sharghi, M.; Mansourkhani, S.M.; Ardekan, A.P.; Jouybari, L.; Daraei, N.; Peiro, K.; Mohamadian, S.; Rezaei, M.; Heidari, M.; et al. Medicinal Plants in the Prevention and Treatment of Colon Cancer. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 2075614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, H.; Luo, J.; Guo, J. Development and validation of a five-immune gene prognostic risk model in colon cancer. BMC Cancer 2020, 20, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fratta, E.; Coral, S.; Covre, A.; Parisi, G.; Colizzi, F.; Danielli, R.; Nicolay, H.J.M.; Sigalotti, L.; Maio, M. The biology of cancer testis antigens: Putative function, regulation and therapeutic potential. Mol. Oncol. 2011, 5, 164–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.-F.; Ren, P.; Shen, W.-Z.; Jin, X.; Zhang, J. The expression, modulation and use of cancer-testis antigens as potential biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2020, 12, 7002–7019. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cannuyer, J.; Loriot, A.; Parvizi, G.K.; De Smet, C. Epigenetic Hierarchy within the MAGEA1 Cancer-Germline Gene: Promoter DNA Methylation Dictates Local Histone Modifications. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- James, S.R.; Cedeno, C.D.; Sharma, A.; Zhang, W.; Mohler, J.L.; Odunsi, K.; Wilson, E.M.; Karpf, A.R. DNA methylation and nucleosome occupancy regulate the cancer germline antigen gene MAGEA11. Epigenetics 2013, 8, 849–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, R.; Kulkarni, P.; Hannenhalli, S. Derepression of Cancer/Testis Antigens in cancer is associated with distinct patterns of DNA Hypomethylation. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Warde-Farley, D.; Donaldson, S.L.; Comes, O.; Zuberi, K.; Badrawi, R.; Chao, P.; Franz, M.; Grouios, C.; Kazi, F.; Lopes, C.T.; et al. The GeneMANIA prediction server: Biological network integration for gene prioritization and predicting gene function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W214–W220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).