Next Article in Journal
Inclusion Complexes of Rifampicin with Native and Derivatized Cyclodextrins: In Silico Modeling, Formulation, and Characterization
Previous Article in Journal
Angiopoietin-1 Mimetic Nanoparticles for Restoring the Function of Endothelial Cells as Potential Therapeutic for Glaucoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lung Cancer Management with Silibinin: A Historical and Translational Perspective
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/ph15010019
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Clinical Management of COVID-19 in Cancer Patients with the STAT3 Inhibitor Silibinin

by
Joaquim Bosch-Barrera
1,2,3,*,
Ariadna Roqué
1,
Eduard Teixidor
1,
Maria Carmen Carmona-Garcia
1,
Aina Arbusà
3,4,
Joan Brunet
1,2,5,
Begoña Martin-Castillo
3,6,
Elisabet Cuyàs
3,4,
Sara Verdura
3,4 and
Javier A. Menendez
3,4,*
1
Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital of Girona, 17007 Girona, Spain
2
Department of Medical Sciences, Medical School, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain
3
Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), 17190 Salt, Spain
4
Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Metabolism and Cancer Group, Catalan Institute of Oncology, 17007 Girona, Spain
5
Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, 08908 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
6
Unit of Clinical Research, Catalan Institute of Oncology, 17007 Girona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15010019
Submission received: 22 November 2021 / Revised: 20 December 2021 / Accepted: 22 December 2021 / Published: 24 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anti-Cancer and Other Health-Promoting Effects of Silibinin and Silibinin Derivatives)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
COVID-19 pathophysiology is caused by a cascade of respiratory and multiorgan failures arising, at least in part, from the SARS-CoV-2-driven dysregulation of the master transcriptional factor STAT3. Pharmacological correction of STAT3 over-stimulation, which is at the root of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and coagulopathy/thrombosis events, should be considered for treatment of severe COVID-19. In this perspective, we first review the current body of knowledge on the role of STAT3 in the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19. We then exemplify the potential clinical value of treating COVID-19 disease with STAT3 inhibitors by presenting the outcomes of two hospitalized patients with active cancer and COVID-19 receiving oral Legalon®—a nutraceutical containing the naturally occurring STAT3 inhibitor silibinin. Both patients, which were recruited to the clinical trial SIL-COVID19 (EudraCT number: 2020-001794-77) had SARS-CoV-2 bilateral interstitial pneumonia and a high COVID-GRAM score, and showed systemic proinflammatory responses in terms of lymphocytopenia and hypoalbuminemia. Both patients were predicted to be at high risk of critical COVID-19 illness in terms of intensive care unit admission, invasive ventilation, or death. In addition to physician’s choice of best available therapy or supportive care, patients received 1050 mg/day Legalon® for 10 days without side-effects. Silibinin-treated cancer/COVID-19+ patients required only minimal oxygen support (2–4 L/min) during the episode, exhibited a sharp decline of the STAT3-regulated C-reactive protein, and demonstrated complete resolution of the pulmonary lesions. These findings might inspire future research to advance our knowledge and improve silibinin-based clinical interventions aimed to target STAT3-driven COVID-19 pathophysiology.

1. STAT3 and COVID-19 Pathophysiology

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced inflammatory disease of the airways and lungs that can lead to multiorgan damage and death [1,2]. In severe cases, COVID-19 pathophysiology involves the impairment of type I interferon (IFN-I) production accompanied by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and extensive endotheliopathy and coagulopathy [3,4,5,6,7,8]. An imbalance in the opposing roles of transcription factors STAT1 and STAT3 seems to operate as the central triggering event at the initial site of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the respiratory epithelium [9,10,11,12,13], resulting in catastrophic inflammatory and coagulopathy/thrombosis episodes in patients at high-risk of COVID-19 (Figure 1).
During SARS-CoV-2 infection, several viral proteins antagonize the IFN-I production pathway and the downstream activation of JAK (Janus kinase)-STAT1 signaling. The inhibitory effects on IFN-1/STAT1 signaling at the site of initial infection block the inducible amplification of IFN-I-driven antiviral responses in proximal target cells, allowing the virus to spread and replicate without limitation [12,13]. Notably, whereas SARS-CoV-2 proteins inhibit IFN-I/STAT1 signaling, the capacity of SARS-CoV-2-associated molecules (single- and double-stranded RNAs and viral proteins) to stimulate the expression and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines remains intact. These events chronically activate the cytokine release syndrome hyperimmune response (a.k.a. cytokine storm) resulting from the unrestricted engagement of the high viral load to pattern recognition receptors in target cells. The vicious cycle of SARS-CoV-2 infection and damage of alveolar epithelial cells triggers the activation of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, which release chemokines (e.g., IL-6) to recruit additional immune cells that further exacerbate lung inflammation [14,15,16,17,18]. The cytokine storm ultimately instigates a systemic amplification cascade via cis and trans-presentation signaling in inflammatory immune cells as well as trans signaling in nonimmune cell compartments such as endothelial cells, overall contributing to key pathophysiologic phenotypes, including ARDS and thromboembolic events.
In cis signaling, the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) binds to membrane-bound IL-6R (mIL-6R), which is restricted largely to innate (neutrophils, macrophages, and natural killer cells) and acquired (B and T cells) immune cells, in a complex with the ubiquitously expressed gp130. In trans signaling, high concentrations of circulating IL-6 can bind the soluble form of IL-6R (sIL-6R), thereby forming a complex with gp130 in cell surfaces lacking mIL-6R, such as endothelial cells (Figure 2). In trans presentation signaling, IL-6 binding to mIL-6R on an immune cell forms a complex with gp130 on Th17 cells to downstream activate T cell signaling involved in ARDS (Figure 2).
Once STAT1 function is impaired and the cytokine storm begins, a concomitant and compensatory STAT3-dependent transcriptional profile becomes dominant to further inhibit the STAT1-mediated IFN-I response. Aberrant transcriptional rewiring towards STAT3 has emerged as the master effector/mediator of all the different (cis and trans-presentation) types of the signaling nodes in type 2 alveolar cells, macrophages, extracellular matrix, T-lymphocytes, and blood, consequently triggering the majority of symptoms observed in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, including proinflammatory conditions, profibrotic status, T-cell lymphopenia, and rapid coagulopathy/thrombosis [13] (Figure 2). Importantly, a positive feedback loop is established between STAT3 activation and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1; SERPIN E1), a serine protease inhibitor secreted by vascular endothelial cells that regulates fibrinolysis and exacerbates the progression of systemic inflammation, especially intravascular coagulation [19,20,21,22]. The escalating activation of the STAT3-PAI-1 interactome in multiple cellular compartments drives a catastrophic cascade of life-threatening systemic events of inflammation, fibrosis, and coagulopathy/thrombosis characteristics seen in severe cases of COVID-19.

2. The SilCOVID-19 Trial: Testing the Clinical Value of Natural Inhibitor of STAT3 against Severe COVID-19 in Cancer Patients

If the over-stimulation of the STAT3 signaling network is a shared node of COVID-19 pathophysiology, the application of anti-STAT3 therapies to block the SARS-CoV-2 lifecycle might moderate the severity of COVID-19. Most direct STAT3 inhibitors (STAT3i) have yet to enter clinical evaluation, early-phase clinical trials have produced mixed results with STAT3-targeted cancer therapies and, despite decades of research, very few FDA-approved STAT3i are available. The unique characteristics of the flavonolignan silibinin—the major bioactive component in the silymarin extract obtained from the seeds of the milk thistle herb (Silybum marianum)—as a bimodal, direct STAT3i impeding the activation, dimerization, nuclear translocation, DNA-binding, and transcriptional activity of STAT3 both in vitro and in situ [23,24,25,26], might help to circumvent the considerable complexity of targeting aberrant STAT3 signaling (Figure 3).
Indeed, silibinin has three major attributes that qualifies it as a strong candidate to clinically manage SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 severity and mortality from a multitarget perspective [12] (Figure 4, top). First, it might exert direct antiviral effects including prevention of virus entry via inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis and inhibition of viral replication by impeding viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase [12,27,28,29,30,31]. Second, it functions as a direct STAT3i with proven STAT3-related therapeutic activity in cancer patients with advanced systemic disease when used orally as part of bioavailable formulations accompanied by low toxicity and reversible mild side-effects [23,24,25,26] (Figure 3). Finally, it might exert protective effects against the ability of central mediators of inflammatory responses to activate critical factors in endotheliopathy and coagulopathy, such as PAI-1 itself or the IL-6 trans-signaling-PAI-1 axis [32].
Based on the aforementioned rationale, we designed a randomized, open-label, phase II multicentric clinical trial (SIL-COVID19; EudraCT number: 2020-001794-77) to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of Legalon®—a silibinin-containing milk thistle extract—in the prevention of ARDS in cancer patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 undergoing systemic treatment or having completed treatment <1 year ago [12]. SIL-COVID-19 was designed in two phases: a nonrandomized safety phase followed by a two-stage randomized phase with a prospective control (Figure 4, bottom). Due to slow accrual, however, the study closed prematurely after two of the eighty-two planned patients were allocated to receive silibinin combined with best supportive care according to the physician’s choice.

2.1. Outcomes of Two Hospitalized Patients with Active Cancer and COVID-19 Orally Receiving the Silibinin-Containing Nutraceutical Legalon®

We present the outcomes of two hospitalized patients with active cancer and COVID-19 receiving Legalon® (Figure 5). We defined critical COVID-19 illness as a composite of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), invasive mechanical ventilation, or death using the COVID-GRAM tool—a risk score predictor of critical illness among patients hospitalized with COVID-19—was originally developed from 10 independent predictors including chest radiography abnormality, age, hemoptysis, dyspnea, unconsciousness, number of comorbidities, cancer history, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, and direct bilirubin [33,34,35].

2.1.1. Patient #1

A 75-year-old male, former smoker with stage IV pancreatic cancer, tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR. The patient had a previous story of hypertension, pathological fracture of L3 due to bone metastasis, and active Psoas abscess caused by Klebsiella oxytoca treated with piperacillin-tazobactam. The patient presented with dyspnea for three days after he tested positive for COVID-19 without experiencing other obvious symptoms. Chest radiography revealed the presence of bilateral pneumonia (Figure 6). Basal blood tests showed several alterations, namely, lymphocytes 3.9%, hemoglobin 8.7 g/dL, dimer D 524 ng/mL, fibrinogen 691 mg/dL, albumin 2.2 gr/dL, LDH 234 U/L, C-reactive protein (CRP) 8.85 mg/mL, and troponin T 32.9 ng/mL (Table 1).
The patient received Legalon® 1050 mg/day for 10 days without any side-effects. The treatment was discontinued after the patient showed improvement. The patient also received a 5-day course of remdesivir (single 200 mg loading dose on day 1 given by intravenous infusion followed by once-daily maintenance of 100 mg from day 2 by intravenous infusion) according to the guidelines on the treatment and management of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in our institution. The patient also received prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin during hospitalization and prednisone 1 mg/kg for 10 days. The patient required supplemental oxygen at a flow rate of 4 L/min during the episode.
Follow-up chest X-ray radiography 14 days after the onset of symptoms showed complete radiographic resolution of the pulmonary lesions (Figure 5). The inflammatory marker LDH returned to reference values and CRP notably declined at the end of Legalon® treatment. The patient was discharged and alive at 30 days after starting the assigned study medication.

2.1.2. Patient #2

A 70-year-old male, current smoker (two packs a day) with stage IV gastric cancer tested positive for COVID-19 by PCR. The patient had a previous history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and chronic pulmonary obstructive disease. The patient presented with dyspnea and chest radiography established the presence of bilateral pneumonia (Figure 6).
Blood tests at the inclusion showed several alterations, namely, hemoglobin 10.1 g/dL (13.5–18), dimer D 294 ng/mL (0–230), fibrinogen 654 mg/dL (150–450), albumin 2.8 g/dL (3.5–5.2), LDH 283 U/L (135–225), CRP 10.5 mg/mL (0–0.5), and troponin T 34.5 ng/mL (<14).
The patient received Legalon® 1050 mg/day for 10 days without any side-effects. The treatment was discontinued after the patient showed improvement. The patient also received prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin during hospitalization. The patient solely required supplemental oxygen (4 L/min) during the episode.
Follow-up chest X-ray radiography 14 days after onset of symptoms showed radiographic suppression and improvement of the pulmonary lesions (Figure 5). The CRP sharply declined at the end of Legalon® treatment. The patient was discharged and alive at 30 days after starting the assigned study medication.

3. Silibinin-Treated Cancer/COVID-19+ Patients: Clinical Lessons Learned and Conundrums

Patients with both cancer and COVID-19 infection often have a more severe clinical course with worse outcomes, and lethality rates of up to 25%. Indeed, the risk of adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection is significantly higher for patients with cancer than for the general population across a broad spectrum of malignancies; the patients are often immunocompromised and older (aged ≥ 60 years) with one or more comorbidities [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Because of the higher risk of severe evolution of COVID-19, a more intensive surveillance strategy should be incorporated into the clinical management of cancer patients (especially those with active malignancy), including early evaluation of symptoms and early treatment for COVID-19. Most reports of COVID-19 among cancer patients mainly focus on its epidemiological and clinical features [36,37], and there are few reports regarding cases of patients who contracted COVID-19 with active cancer disease and additional comorbidities.
When the COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed the healthcare systems in Spain, particularly during the first and second waves of the pandemic, the SIL-COVID19 study was initially designed to reduce the risk of critical COVID-19 illness from 30% to 15% in a onco-hematological population, which usually have limited access to ICU and invasive ventilation due to cancer prognosis. The recent COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) cohort study involving patients from the USA, Canada, and Spain revealed that, among patients with cancer and COVID-19, 30-day all-cause mortality was high and associated not only with general risk factors but also with active cancer (progressing versus remission, odds ratio 5.20, 95% confidence interval 2.77–9.77) [36]. According to the cohort study of cancer patients with COVID-19 in Europe, active malignancy (p < 0.0001) emerged also as the sole oncologic feature predictive of higher mortality rates alongside age ≥65 (p < 0.0001) and comorbidities (p = 0.002) [37]. Systemic inflammation is another validated bedside predictor of adverse outcomes in cancer patients with COVID-19; accordingly, hypoalbuminemia (escape of albumin to the interstitial space due to inflammation-increased capillary permeability) and lymphocytopenia (reduction of lymphocytes due to systemic inflammation and direct neutralization) are independently predictive of severe COVID-19 in cancer patients, as computed by the OnCovid Inflammatory Score [46,47]. In the present case reports, cancer patients #1 and #2, both with active malignancy and systemic inflammation including hypoalbuminemia and lymphocytopenia, scored 193 and 200 points, respectively, in the COVID-GRAM risk score (88.9% and 91.7% of risk of critical illness). We acknowledge, however, that there is a need for caution when using the China cohort-based COVID-GRAM tool for predicting critical illness in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Europe because, while useful for identifying Caucasian patients who are at low risk of critical illness and mortality, it seems to overestimate risk in the highest-risk patients [34,35].
Silibinin-treated cancer/COVID-19+ patients exhibited a slight but significant decline in LDH, an inflammatory prognostic biomarker that is increased during acute and severe lung damage and capable of predicting with high accuracy the in-hospital mortality in severe and critically ill patients with COVID-19 [48,49]. They further exhibited a sharp decline in CRP, a reliable marker of acute inflammation that is transcriptionally activated by STAT3 in response to IL-6 [50,51]. Because CRP is a useful marker of the IL-6 signaling via the IL-6R/JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway [52,53,54], it is tempting to suggest that silibinin is reducing IL-6-induced CRP expression via suppression of STAT3 hyperactivation. LDH and CRP appear to reflect the respiratory destress consequent to the abnormal inflammation status induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection and predict respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients [55]. Accordingly, cancer/COVID-19+ patients treated with Legalon® did not require closer respiratory monitoring or more aggressive supportive therapies during their episodes, and chest radiography follow-up showed complete resolution of the initially revealed bilateral pneumonia. We cannot establish a causal relationship between a silibinin-based treatment and the favorable outcome of hospitalized, SARS-CoV-2-infected cancer patients at high risk of critical COVID-19 illness. Moreover, the concomitant receipt of remdesivir and prednisone might associate with clinical improvement in Legalon®-treated patient #1. Although we are lacking a matched retrospective cohort of cancer patients with bilateral pneumonia as a result of COVID-19, it should be noted that a majority of cancer patients develop at least one complication from COVID-19, the most common being acute respiratory failure and ARDS [40]. Moreover, significantly higher mortality rates are observed among male cancer patients, for those aged ≥65 years, and in those with ≥2 preexisting comorbidities [40], a threefold at-risk condition occurring in the cancer/COVID-19+ patients treated with silibinin-containing Legalon®.
The SIL-COVID19 trial was closed before the first scheduled interim analysis because of poor recruitment that was not amenable to improvement. The trial received approval from the Spanish Agency of Medicine and Health Products (AEMPS) in June 2020 when the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was in remission in Spain. Moreover, the safety cohort of the study was approved solely for a single center and, because of the re-organization of the Public Health System in Spain, several county hospitals referred patients to other centers that were designed for attending COVID-19 patients after the first wave. Refusal to participate in the trial was higher than expected; unwillingness to participate was likely multifactorial but involved both the isolation of COVID-19-positive cancer patients and the exacerbated shortage of health workers that left oncology care facilities short-staffed. Finally, the introduction of vaccinations rapidly progressed among prioritized cancer patients who received vaccination with COVID19 mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Comirnaty® and Moderna Spikevax® COVID-19 vaccine) from March 2021 to May 2021. Consequently, the number of oncology patients requiring hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the trial region dropped markedly and steady enrollment of trial patients became virtually impossible. In the light of the growing evidence that cancer patients might not respond adequately to COVID-19 vaccination [56,57,58,59,60], together with the recent discovery that a STAT3-related immune and proliferation transcriptional network is activated in COVID-19 cancer patients [61], it is important to broaden knowledge of the clinico-molecular interactions between SARS-CoV-2 and cancer at the level of STAT3. Along this line, the antidepressant fluvoxamine, which has recently been shown to significantly reduce the need for hospitalization in high-risk COVID-19 patients [62], is known to inhibit STAT3 activity [63,64].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Subjects

The SilCOVID-19 study was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register and is available online [65]. The primary endpoint was to reduce the proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation during COVID-19 disease. Secondary aims included mortality, safety, and identification of biomarkers.

4.2. Legalon® Dosing

The SilCOVID-19 study involved the usage of a high-dose (1050 mg/day) instead of a standard-dose (450 mg/day) of Legalon® for up to 14 days. A safety cohort phase was proposed to involve 10 patients being treated in a single center to allow for response and toxicity analysis before proceeding into randomized phase II.
Previous studies have used higher doses of Legalon® than those indicated on the technical data sheet. A dose of 700 mg/day vs 420 mg/day vs placebo for 48 weeks (n = 72 patients) or 700 mg/day versus 420 mg/day versus placebo for 24 weeks (n = 154) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) demonstrated a safety profile comparable to placebo in both cohorts [66,67]. In a study for decompensated hepatic cirrhosis due to HCV (n = 62), a Legalon® dosage of 1050 mg/day vs 420 mg/day was compared [68]. The high-dose cohort benefited from better clinical activity and improved quality of life without serious adverse effects. Higher doses of Legalon® have been administered intravenously (20 mg/kg/ day for 14 days, which would be equivalent to 1400 mg/day for a 70 kg person) in 16 patients with HCV/HIV coinfection, showing good clinical activity and favorable toxicity profile [69]. In a cancer treatment setting, silibinin doses of 2800 mg/day (oral silybin-phosphatidylcholine) have been administered for 4 weeks with neo-adjuvant intentions to breast cancer patients (n = 12) without toxicity issues [70]. High-doses (13 gr/day) of oral silybin-phytosome have been administered to prostate cancer patients (n = 6) for 14–31 days [71]. Only one patient experienced a thromboembolic event, whereas the rest of toxicities were diarrhea (n = 4) and transient grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia (n = 1) [71].

4.3. Ethics Statement

The hospital (Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, Girona, Spain) ethics committee (Clinical Investigation Ethic Committee, CIEC) approved the protocol and any amendments. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration, and its later amendments, or comparable ethical standards. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

5. Conclusions

Our findings from the clinical management of COVID-19 with silibinin in hospitalized cancer patients, which should be viewed as observations rather than recommendations for treatment, might inspire future silibinin-based trails in nononcological populations of COVID-19 patients. This is the case of the SIL-COVINT-21 trial (NCT04816682), which is ongoing in a nononcological population in Slovakia. This prospective open label study will explore whether silibinin can improve the evolution of COVID-19 in patients admitted to internal medicine wards using a historical cohort for propensity-match analysis. In the active-comparator arm, consecutively-admitted patients (n = 30) will be allocated to receive silymarin tablets (150 mg each) three times daily (3-2-2) and will be compared with consecutive patients with the same inclusion/exclusion criteria as in the active arm, hospitalized at the same department before the initiation of the study (historical controls). Findings from this trial might help clarify whether silibinin-based approaches can therapeutically integrate the mechanisms of action of IL-6-targeted monoclonal antibodies (e.g., tocilizumab, sarilumab, siltuximab) and pan-JAK1/2 inhibitors (e.g., baricitinib) to limit the cytokine storm, T-cell lymphopenia, and coagulopathy in the clinical setting of severe COVID-19.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.B.-B. and J.A.M.; methodology, J.B.-B. and J.A.M.; formal analysis; J.B.-B. and J.A.M.; investigation (patient data acquisition), J.B.-B., A.R., E.T. and M.C.C.-G.; validation, J.B.-B., A.R., E.T. and M.C.C.-G.; data curation, J.B.-B., A.R., E.T., M.C.C.-G., J.B. and B.M.-C.; visualization, E.C., A.A., S.V. and J.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.B.-B., E.C., A.A., S.V. and J.A.M.; writing—review and editing, J.B.-B., E.C., A.A., B.M.-C., S.V. and J.A.M.; supervision, J.B.-B. and J.A.M.; funding acquisition, J.B.-B., E.C. and J.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Work in the Menendez laboratory is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Grant PID2019-104055GB-I00, Plan Nacional de I + D + I, founded by the European Regional Development Fund, Spain) and by an unrestricted research grant from the Fundació Oncolliga Girona (Lliga catalana d’ajuda al malalt de càncer, Girona). Joaquim Bosch-Barrera is the recipient of Research Grants from Grupo Español de Cáncer de Pulmón (GECP), La Marató de TV3 foundation (201906), and the Health Research and Innovation Strategic Plan (SLT006/17/114; PERIS 2016-2020; Pla stratègic de recerca i innovació en salut; Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya). Elisabet Cuyàs holds a research contract “Miguel Servet” (CP20/00003) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Spain). The authors would like to heartily thank König (www.konig.cat, access date 30 May 2021) for their generous donation to fund our cancer research on silibinin in Girona.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta de Girona (CEA.HUJT: 27 May 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All applicable institutional regulations concerning the ethical use of information from human patients were followed during this research.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. We deleted all information that might identify the patients.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Kenneth McCreath for editorial support.

Conflicts of Interest

J.B.-B. reports grants and personal fees from Roche-Genentech, grants from Pfizer and Pierre Fabre, and personal fees from MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. This study was supported in part by a research grant from Euromed S.A. (Mollet del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain) to J.B.-B. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guan, W.J.; Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, W.H.; Ou, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, L.; Shan, H.; Lei, C.L.; Hui, D.S.C.; et al. China Medical Treatment Expert Group for COVID-19. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1708–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, G.; Wu, D.; Guo, W.; Cao, Y.; Huang, D.; Wang, H.; Wang, T.; Zhang, X.; Chen, H.; Yu, H.; et al. Clinical and immunological features in severe and moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 2620–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Hadjadj, J.; Yatim, N.; Barnabei, L.; Corneau, A.; Boussier, J.; Smith, N.; Péré, H.; Charbit, B.; Bondet, V.; Chenevier-Gobeaux, C.; et al. Impaired type I interferon activity and inflammatory responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Science 2020, 369, 718–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Higashikuni, Y.; Liu, W.; Obana, T.; Sata, M. Pathogenic Basis of Thromboinflammation and Endothelial Injury in COVID-19: Current Findings and Therapeutic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Jin, Y.; Ji, W.; Zhang, W.; Duan, G. An Update on Innate Immune Responses during SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Viruses 2021, 13, 2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. King, C.; Sprent, J. Dual Nature of Type I Interferons in SARS-CoV-2-Induced Inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2021, 42, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Taoufik, Y.; de Goër de Herve, M.G.; Corgnac, S.; Durrbach, A.; Mami-Chouaib, F. When Immunity Kills: The Lessons of SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 692598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. García-Ortega, A.; de la Rosa, D.; Oscullo, G.; Castillo-Villegas, D.; López-Reyes, R.; Martínez-García, M.Á. Coagulation disorders and thromboembolic disease in COVID-19: Review of current evidence in search of a better approach. J. Thorac. Dis. 2021, 13, 1239–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jafarzadeh, A.; Nemati, M.; Jafarzadeh, S. Contribution of STAT3 to the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 54, 104836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bronte, V.; Ugel, S.; Tinazzi, E.; Vella, A.; De Sanctis, F.; Canè, S.; Batani, V.; Trovato, R.; Fiore, A.; Petrova, V.; et al. Baricitinib restrains the immune dysregulation in patients with severe COVID-19. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 6409–6416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, G.B.; Zhou, M.M. Calming the cytokine storm of COVID-19 through inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Drug Discov. Today, 2021; in press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bosch-Barrera, J.; Martin-Castillo, B.; Buxó, M.; Brunet, J.; Encinar, J.A.; Menendez, J.A. Silibinin and SARS-CoV-2: Dual Targeting of Host Cytokine Storm and Virus Replication Machinery for Clinical Management of COVID-19 Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Matsuyama, T.; Kubli, S.P.; Yoshinaga, S.K.; Pfeffer, K.; Mak, T.W. An aberrant STAT pathway is central to COVID-19. Cell Death Differ. 2020, 27, 3209–3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Merad, M.; Martin, J.C. Pathological inflammation in patients with COVID-19: A key role for monocytes and macrophages. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jose, R.J.; Manuel, A. COVID-19 cytokine storm: The interplay between inflammation and coagulation. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, e46–e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kang, S.; Tanaka, T.; Narazaki, M.; Kishimoto, T. Targeting Interleukin-6 Signaling in Clinic. Immunity 2019, 50, 1007–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Spinelli, F.R.; Conti, F.; Gadina, M. HiJAKing SARS-CoV-2? The potential role of JAK inhibitors in the management of COVID-19. Sci. Immunol. 2020, 5, eabc5367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moore, J.B.; June, C.H. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science 2020, 368, 473–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Portier, I.; Campbell, R.A.; Denorme, F. Mechanisms of immunothrombosis in COVID-19. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2021, 28, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gando, S.; Wada, T. Thromboplasminflammation in COVID-19 Coagulopathy: Three Viewpoints for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 649122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, S.S. The Central Role of PAI-1 in COVID-19: Thrombosis and beyond. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2021, 65, 238–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kellici, T.F.; Pilka, E.S.; Bodkin, M.J. Therapeutic Potential of Targeting Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 in COVID-19. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 42, 431–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bosch-Barrera, J.; Menendez, J.A. Silibinin and STAT3: A natural way of targeting transcription factors for cancer therapy. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2015, 41, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bosch-Barrera, J.; Queralt, B.; Menendez, J.A. Targeting STAT3 with silibinin to improve cancer therapeutics. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2017, 58, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Verdura, S.; Cuyàs, E.; Llorach-Parés, L.; Pérez-Sánchez, A.; Micol, V.; Nonell-Canals, A.; Joven, J.; Valiente, M.; Sánchez-Martínez, M.; Bosch-Barrera, J.; et al. Silibinin is a direct inhibitor of STAT3. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 116, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Priego, N.; Zhu, L.; Monteiro, C.; Mulders, M.; Wasilewski, D.; Bindeman, W.; Doglio, L.; Martínez, L.; Martínez-Saez, E.; Ramón, Y.; et al. STAT3 labels a subpopulation of reactive astrocytes required for brain metastasis. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1024–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Blaising, J.; Lévy, P.L.; Gondeau, C.; Phelip, C.; Varbanov, M.; Teissier, E.; Ruggiero, F.; Polyak, S.J.; Oberlies, N.H.; Ivanovic, T.; et al. Silibinin inhibits hepatitis C virus entry into hepatocytes by hindering clathrin-dependent trafficking. Cell Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1866–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ferenci, P.; Scherzer, T.M.; Kerschner, H.; Rutter, K.; Beinhardt, S.; Hofer, H.; Schöniger-Hekele, M.; Holzmann, H.; Steindl-Munda, P. Silibinin is a potent antiviral agent in patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 1561–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Payer, B.A.; Reiberger, T.; Rutter, K.; Beinhardt, S.; Staettermayer, A.F.; Peck-Radosavljevic, M.; Ferenci, P. Successful HCV eradication and inhibition of HIV replication by intravenous silibinin in an HIV-HCV coinfected patient. J. Clin. Virol. 2010, 49, 131–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rendina, M.; D’Amato, M.; Castellaneta, A.; Castellaneta, N.M.; Brambilla, N.; Giacovelli, G.; Rovati, L.; Rizzi, S.F.; Zappimbulso, M.; Bringiotti, R.S.; et al. Antiviral activity and safety profile of silibinin in HCV patients with advanced fibrosis after liver transplantation: A randomized clinical trial. Transpl. Int. 2014, 27, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, C.H.; Jassey, A.; Hsu, H.Y.; Lin, L.T. Antiviral Activities of Silymarin and Derivatives. Molecules 2019, 24, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Speciale, A.; Muscarà, C.; Molonia, M.S.; Cimino, F.; Saija, A.; Giofrè, S.V. Silibinin as potential tool against SARS-CoV-2: In silico spike receptor-binding domain and main protease molecular docking analysis, and in vitro endothelial protective effects. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 4616–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liang, W.; Liang, H.; Ou, L.; Chen, B.; Chen, A.; Li, C.; Li, Y.; Guan, W.; Sang, L.; Lu, J.; et al. Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score to Predict the Occurrence of Critical Illness in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Moreno-Pérez, Ó.; Andrés, M.; León-Ramirez, J.M.; Sánchez-Payá, J.; Boix, V.; Gil, J.; Merino, E. The COVID-GRAM Tool for Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in Europe. JAMA Intern. Med. 2021, 181, 1000–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Armiñanzas, C.; Arnaiz de Las Revillas, F.; Gutiérrez Cuadra, M.; Arnaiz, A.; Fernández Sampedro, M.; González-Rico, C.; Ferrer, D.; Mora, V.; Suberviola, B.; Latorre, M.; et al. Usefulness of the COVID-GRAM and CURB-65 scores for predicting severity in patients with COVID-19. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 108, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yarza, R.; Bover, M.; Paredes, D.; López-López, F.; Jara-Casas, D.; Castelo-Loureiro, A.; Baena, J.; Mazarico, J.M.; Folgueira, M.D.; Meléndez-Carmona, M.Á.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients undergoing active treatment: Analysis of clinical features and predictive factors for severe respiratory failure and death. Eur. J. Cancer 2020, 135, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Elkrief, A.; Desilets, A.; Papneja, N.; Cvetkovic, L.; Groleau, C.; Lakehal, Y.A.; Shbat, L.; Richard, C.; Malo, J.; Belkaid, W.; et al. High mortality among hospital-acquired COVID-19 infection in patients with cancer: A multicentre observational cohort study. Eur. J. Cancer 2020, 139, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Mei, Q.; Yuan, X. Clinical challenges in cancer patients with COVID-19: Aging, immunosuppression, and comorbidities. Aging 2020, 12, 24462–24474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kuderer, N.M.; Choueiri, T.K.; Shah, D.P.; Shyr, Y.; Rubinstein, S.M.; Rivera, D.R.; Shete, S.; Hsu, C.Y.; Desai, A.; de Lima Lopes, G., Jr.; et al. Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): A cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1907–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pinato, D.J.; Zambelli, A.; Aguilar-Company, J.; Bower, M.; Sng, C.; Salazar, R.; Bertuzzi, A.; Brunet, J.; Mesia, R.; Segui, E.; et al. Clinical portrait of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in European cancer patients. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 1465–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chavez-MacGregor, M.; Lei, X.; Zhao, H.; Scheet, P.; Giordano, S.H. Evaluation of COVID-19 Mortality and Adverse Outcomes in US Patients with or without Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2021, e215148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bertuzzi, A.F.; Ciccarelli, M.; Marrari, A.; Gennaro, N.; Dipasquale, A.; Giordano, L.; Cariboni, U.; Quagliuolo, V.L.; Alloisio, M.; Santoro, A. Impact of active cancer on COVID-19 survival: A matched-analysis on 557 consecutive patients at an Academic Hospital in Lombardy, Italy. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 125, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, H.; Han, H.; He, T.; Labbe, K.E.; Hernandez, A.V.; Chen, H.; Velcheti, V.; Stebbing, J.; Wong, K.K. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19-Infected Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2021, 113, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fu, C.; Stoeckle, J.H.; Masri, L.; Pandey, A.; Cao, M.; Littman, D.; Rybstein, M.; Saith, S.E.; Yarta, K.; Rohatgi, A.; et al. COVID-19 outcomes in hospitalized patients with active cancer: Experiences from a major New York City health care system. Cancer 2021, 127, 3466–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Monari, C.; Sagnelli, C.; Maggi, P.; Sangiovanni, V.; Numis, F.G.; Gentile, I.; Masullo, A.; Rescigno, C.; Calabria, G.; Megna, A.S.; et al. More Severe COVID-19 in Patients with Active Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Cohort Study. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 662746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dettorre, G.M.; Dolly, S.; Loizidou, A.; Chester, J.; Jackson, A.; Mukherjee, U.; Zambelli, A.; Aguilar-Company, J.; Bower, M.; Sng, C.C.T.; et al. Systemic pro-inflammatory response identifies patients with cancer with adverse outcomes from SARS-CoV-2 infection: The OnCovid Inflammatory Score. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e002277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dettorre, G.M.; Patel, M.; Gennari, A.; Pentheroudakis, G.; Romano, E.; Cortellini, A.; Pinato, D.J. The systemic pro-inflammatory response: Targeting the dangerous liaison between COVID-19 and cancer. ESMO Open 2021, 6, 100123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. McFadden, R.G.; Oliphant, L.D. Serum lactate dehydrogenase in interstitial lung disease. Chest 1991, 100, 1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dong, X.; Sun, L.; Li, Y. Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase for in-hospital mortality in severe and critically ill patients with COVID-19. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 17, 2225–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Black, S.; Kushner, I.; Samols, D. C-reactive Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 48487–48490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhang, D.; Sun, M.; Samols, D.; Kushner, I. STAT3 participates in transcriptional activation of the C-reactive protein gene by interleukin-6. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 9503–9509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Arnaud, C.; Burger, F.; Steffens, S.; Veillard, N.R.; Nguyen, T.H.; Trono, D.; Mach, F. Statins reduce interleukin-6-induced C-reactive protein in human hepatocytes: New evidence for direct antiinflammatory effects of statins. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, 1231–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sun, H.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, P.; Li, Q.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, C. Adiponectin reduces C-reactive protein expression and downregulates STAT3 phosphorylation induced by IL-6 in HepG2 cells. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2011, 347, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, T.M.; Hsieh, S.C.; Chen, J.W.; Chiang, A.N. Docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid reduce C-reactive protein expression and STAT3 activation in IL-6-treated HepG2 cells. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2013, 377, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Poggiali, E.; Zaino, D.; Immovilli, P.; Rovero, L.; Losi, G.; Dacrema, A.; Nuccetelli, M.; Vadacca, G.B.; Guidetti, D.; Vercelli, A.; et al. Lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein as predictors of respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients. Clin. Chim. Acta 2020, 509, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Agha, M.; Blake, M.; Chilleo, C.; Wells, A.; Haidar, G. Suboptimal response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in hematologic malignancies patients. medRxiv 2021. [CrossRef]
  57. Jiménez, M.; Roldan, E.; Fernández-Naval, C.; Villacampa, G.; Martinez-Gallo, M.; Medina-Gil, D.; Peralta-Garzón, S.; Pujadas, G.; Hernández, C.; Pagès Geli, C.; et al. Cellular and humoral immunogenicity of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with hematologic malignancies. Blood Adv. 2021; in press. [Google Scholar]
  58. Monin, L.; Laing, A.G.; Muñoz-Ruiz, M.; McKenzie, D.R.; Del Molino Del Barrio, I.; Alaguthurai, T.; Domingo-Vila, C.; Hayday, T.S.; Graham, C.; Seow, J.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: Interim analysis of a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, 765–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Palich, R.; Veyri, M.; Vozy, A.; Marot, S.; Gligorov, J.; Benderra, M.A.; Maingon, P.; Morand-Joubert, L.; Adjoutah, Z.; Marcelin, A.G.; et al. High seroconversion rate but low antibody titers after two injections of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in patients treated with chemotherapy for solid cancers. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 1294–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Palich, R.; Veyri, M.; Marot, S.; Vozy, A.; Gligorov, J.; Maingon, P.; Marcelin, A.G.; Spano, J.P. Weak immunogenicity after a single dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in treated cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 1051–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sacconi, A.; De Vitis, C.; de Latouliere, L.; di Martino, S.; De Nicola, F.; Goeman, F.; Mottini, C.; Paolini, F.; D’Ascanio, M.; Ricci, A.; et al. Multi-omic approach identifies a transcriptional network coupling innate immune response to proliferation in the blood of COVID-19 cancer patients. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Reis, G.; Dos Santos Moreira-Silva, E.A.; Silva, D.C.M.; Thabane, L.; Milagres, A.C.; Ferreira, T.S.; Dos Santos, C.V.Q.; de Souza Campos, V.H.; Nogueira, A.M.R.; de Almeida, A.P.F.G.; et al. Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of emergency care and hospitalisation among patients with COVID-19: The TOGETHER randomised, platform clinical trial. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 10, e42–e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hosoi, T.; Miyahara, T.; Kayano, T.; Yokoyama, S.; Ozawa, K. Fluvoxamine attenuated endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced leptin resistance. Front. Endocrinol. 2012, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. He, J.H.; Liu, R.P.; Peng, Y.M.; Guo, Q.; Zhu, L.B.; Lian, Y.Z.; Hu, B.L.; Fan, H.H.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, J.H. Differential and paradoxical roles of new-generation antidepressants in primary astrocytic inflammation. J. Neuroinflamm. 2021, 18, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Available online: http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial(2020-001794-77/ES (accessed on 23 December 2021).
  66. Navarro, V.J.; Belle, S.H.; D’Amato, M.; Adfhal, N.; Brunt, E.M.; Fried, M.W.; Reddy, K.R.; Wahed, A.S.; Harrison, S. Silymarin in NASH and C Hepatitis (SyNCH) Study Group. Silymarin in non-cirrhotics with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0221683. [Google Scholar]
  67. Fried, M.W.; Navarro, V.J.; Afdhal, N.; Belle, S.H.; Wahed, A.S.; Hawke, R.L.; Doo, E.; Meyers, C.M.; Reddy, K.R. Silymarin in NASH and C Hepatitis (SyNCH) Study Group. Effect of silymarin (milk thistle) on liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C unsuccessfully treated with interferon therapy: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012, 308, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fathalah, W.F.; Abdel Aziz, M.A.; Abou El Soud, N.H.; El Raziky, M.E.S. High Dose of Silymarin in Patients with Decompensated Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2017, 37, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Braun, D.L.; Rauch, A.; Aouri, M.; Durisch, N.; Eberhard, N.; Anagnostopoulos, A.; Ledergerber, B.; Müllhaupt, B.; Metzner, K.J.; Decosterd, L.; et al. A Lead-In with Silibinin Prior to Triple-Therapy Translates into Favorable Treatment Outcomes in Difficult-To-Treat HIV/Hepatitis C Coinfected Patients. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Lazzeroni, M.; Guerrieri-Gonzaga, A.; Gandini, S.; Johansson, H.; Serrano, D.; Cazzaniga, M.; Aristarco, V.; Puccio, A.; Mora, S.; Caldarella, P.; et al. A Presurgical Study of Oral Silybin-Phosphatidylcholine in Patients with Early Breast Cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. 2016, 9, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Flaig, T.W.; Glodé, M.; Gustafson, D.; van Bokhoven, A.; Tao, Y.; Wilson, S.; Su, L.J.; Li, Y.; Harrison, G.; Agarwal, R.; et al. A study of high-dose oral silybin-phytosome followed by prostatectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer. Prostate 2010, 70, 848–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g001 550
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 infection-driven STAT1-to-STAT3 transcriptional shifting is central to COVID-19 pathophysiology. SARS-CoV-2-mediated inhibition of STAT1/IFN-I-stimulated genes (ISGs) and the subsequent shift to a hyperactive, STAT3 dominant proinflammatory and immune response signaling may drive the key clinical features of severe COVID-19 including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and coagulopathy/thrombosis events. Prevention of the excessive, compensatory activation of STAT3 that occurs once STAT1 is compromised and symptoms arise after SARS-CoV-2 infection, is a therapeutic avenue that might impede the combinatorial activation of both ARDS-driving inflammatory cytokines/chemokines and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)-related coagulopathy/thrombosis events in severe COVID-19 cases. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 1. SARS-CoV-2 infection-driven STAT1-to-STAT3 transcriptional shifting is central to COVID-19 pathophysiology. SARS-CoV-2-mediated inhibition of STAT1/IFN-I-stimulated genes (ISGs) and the subsequent shift to a hyperactive, STAT3 dominant proinflammatory and immune response signaling may drive the key clinical features of severe COVID-19 including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and coagulopathy/thrombosis events. Prevention of the excessive, compensatory activation of STAT3 that occurs once STAT1 is compromised and symptoms arise after SARS-CoV-2 infection, is a therapeutic avenue that might impede the combinatorial activation of both ARDS-driving inflammatory cytokines/chemokines and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)-related coagulopathy/thrombosis events in severe COVID-19 cases. Created with Biorender.com.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g001
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g002 550
Figure 2. STAT3: A master effector/mediator of the pathophysiological traits of severe COVID-19. IL-6 inhibitors can suppress only cis and trans signaling; IL-6R inhibitors can suppress not only cis and trans signaling but also trans presentation. Similar to IL-6/IL-6R inhibitors, pharmacological intervention with direct STAT3 inhibitors is expected to suppress IL-6-driven cis, trans, and trans presentation signaling in immune and nonimmune cell compartments. Direct STAT3 inhibitors (STAT3i) could be viewed as a novel strategy to prevent the activation of self-propagating, deleterious cascades of systemic inflammation that underlie the pathophysiology of pulmonary dysfunction in ARDS, vascular permeability and leakage, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and coagulopathy in the late scenario of severe COVID-19. Created with Biorender.com and mindthegraph.com.
Figure 2. STAT3: A master effector/mediator of the pathophysiological traits of severe COVID-19. IL-6 inhibitors can suppress only cis and trans signaling; IL-6R inhibitors can suppress not only cis and trans signaling but also trans presentation. Similar to IL-6/IL-6R inhibitors, pharmacological intervention with direct STAT3 inhibitors is expected to suppress IL-6-driven cis, trans, and trans presentation signaling in immune and nonimmune cell compartments. Direct STAT3 inhibitors (STAT3i) could be viewed as a novel strategy to prevent the activation of self-propagating, deleterious cascades of systemic inflammation that underlie the pathophysiology of pulmonary dysfunction in ARDS, vascular permeability and leakage, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and coagulopathy in the late scenario of severe COVID-19. Created with Biorender.com and mindthegraph.com.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g002
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g003 550
Figure 3. Silibinin: A bimodal STAT3i of the JAK-STAT3 pathway. Silibinin can reduce IL-6 inducible, constitutive, and acquired feedback activation of STAT3 at tyrosine 705 (Y705). A multifaceted combination of enzymatic assays, computational modeling, and in vitro/in situ validation has delineated the mechanism of action through which silibinin targets STAT3 [23,24,25,26]. Silibinin fails to drastically alter the activity of the STAT3 upstream kinases JAK1 and JAK2 (mechanism 1). Silibinin could directly bind to both the Src homology-2 (SH2) domain to indirectly prevent Y705 phosphorylation via a unique binding mode that partially overlap with the cavity occupied by other STAT3 inhibitors (mechanism 2) and the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of STAT3 to block the binding of activated STAT3 to its consensus DNA sequence via a unique mechanism that might involve direct interactions with DNA (mechanism 3). Accordingly, silibinin treatment suffices to reduce phosphor-activation of Y705, prevent STAT3 nuclear translocation, and suppress STAT3-directed transcriptional activity. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 3. Silibinin: A bimodal STAT3i of the JAK-STAT3 pathway. Silibinin can reduce IL-6 inducible, constitutive, and acquired feedback activation of STAT3 at tyrosine 705 (Y705). A multifaceted combination of enzymatic assays, computational modeling, and in vitro/in situ validation has delineated the mechanism of action through which silibinin targets STAT3 [23,24,25,26]. Silibinin fails to drastically alter the activity of the STAT3 upstream kinases JAK1 and JAK2 (mechanism 1). Silibinin could directly bind to both the Src homology-2 (SH2) domain to indirectly prevent Y705 phosphorylation via a unique binding mode that partially overlap with the cavity occupied by other STAT3 inhibitors (mechanism 2) and the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of STAT3 to block the binding of activated STAT3 to its consensus DNA sequence via a unique mechanism that might involve direct interactions with DNA (mechanism 3). Accordingly, silibinin treatment suffices to reduce phosphor-activation of Y705, prevent STAT3 nuclear translocation, and suppress STAT3-directed transcriptional activity. Created with Biorender.com.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g003
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g004 550
Figure 4. The SilCOVID-19 trial: Biological rationale and study design. The SilCOVID-19 study is a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of silibinin supplementation in the prevention of the respiratory failure progression in patients with active cancer disease and infection by SARS-CoV-2. Created with Biorender.com and mindthegraph.com.
Figure 4. The SilCOVID-19 trial: Biological rationale and study design. The SilCOVID-19 study is a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of silibinin supplementation in the prevention of the respiratory failure progression in patients with active cancer disease and infection by SARS-CoV-2. Created with Biorender.com and mindthegraph.com.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g004
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g005 550
Figure 5. Clinical management of COVID-19 in hospitalized cancer patients with the STAT3i silibinin: two case reports. Both patients had SARS-CoV-2 bilateral interstitial pneumonia and a high COVID-GRAM score (i.e., 193 and 200 are the points scored in the COVID-GRAM Critical Illness Risk Score Tool by patient #1 and #2, respectively) [33,34,35]. Both patients were, therefore, predicted to be at high risk of critical COVID-19 illness in terms of intensive care unit admission, invasive ventilation, or death. In addition to physician’s choice of best available therapy (e.g., remdesivir) or supportive care (e.g., prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin), patients received 1050 mg/day Legalon® for 10 days without side-effects. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 5. Clinical management of COVID-19 in hospitalized cancer patients with the STAT3i silibinin: two case reports. Both patients had SARS-CoV-2 bilateral interstitial pneumonia and a high COVID-GRAM score (i.e., 193 and 200 are the points scored in the COVID-GRAM Critical Illness Risk Score Tool by patient #1 and #2, respectively) [33,34,35]. Both patients were, therefore, predicted to be at high risk of critical COVID-19 illness in terms of intensive care unit admission, invasive ventilation, or death. In addition to physician’s choice of best available therapy (e.g., remdesivir) or supportive care (e.g., prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin), patients received 1050 mg/day Legalon® for 10 days without side-effects. Created with Biorender.com.
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g005
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g006 550
Figure 6. Radiological aspects of COVID-19 pneumonia in two cancer patients treated with silibinin.Top. Chest X-ray series in a 75-year-old male with stage IV pancreatic cancer and COVID-19 pneumonia. Left. Chest X-ray depicting bilateral lung infiltrates on illness day 3. Right. Chest X-ray depicting complete radiographic resolution of the pulmonary lesions after 10 days treatment with 1050 mg/day Legalon®. Bottom. Chest X-ray series in a 70-year-old male with stage IV gastric cancer and COVID-19 pneumonia. Left. Chest X-ray depicting bilateral lung infiltrates on illness day 1. Right. Chest X-ray depicting complete radiographic resolution of the pulmonary lesions after 10 days treatment with 1050 mg/day Legalon® (LPM: Liters per minute, L/min).
Figure 6. Radiological aspects of COVID-19 pneumonia in two cancer patients treated with silibinin.Top. Chest X-ray series in a 75-year-old male with stage IV pancreatic cancer and COVID-19 pneumonia. Left. Chest X-ray depicting bilateral lung infiltrates on illness day 3. Right. Chest X-ray depicting complete radiographic resolution of the pulmonary lesions after 10 days treatment with 1050 mg/day Legalon®. Bottom. Chest X-ray series in a 70-year-old male with stage IV gastric cancer and COVID-19 pneumonia. Left. Chest X-ray depicting bilateral lung infiltrates on illness day 1. Right. Chest X-ray depicting complete radiographic resolution of the pulmonary lesions after 10 days treatment with 1050 mg/day Legalon® (LPM: Liters per minute, L/min).
Pharmaceuticals 15 00019 g006
Table
Table 1. Baseline and follow-up values of serum biochemistry in silibinin-treated cancer/COVID-19 + patients.
Table 1. Baseline and follow-up values of serum biochemistry in silibinin-treated cancer/COVID-19 + patients.
Patient #1 Patient #2
ReferenceBaseline7-Days14-DaysBaseline7-Days14-Days
LDH *135–225 U/L234245214283292232
CRP0–0.5 mg/mL8.857.514.5710.57.111.36
Lymphocytes25–40%3.9%10.3%10.7%25.3%16.3%21%
Fibrinogen140–450 mg/dL691722700654659582
Dimer D0–230 ng/mL524577463294345393
Troponin T<14 ng/mL32.976.942.134.535.424.8
* LDH: Lactate Dehydrogenase.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bosch-Barrera, J.; Roqué, A.; Teixidor, E.; Carmona-Garcia, M.C.; Arbusà, A.; Brunet, J.; Martin-Castillo, B.; Cuyàs, E.; Verdura, S.; Menendez, J.A. Clinical Management of COVID-19 in Cancer Patients with the STAT3 Inhibitor Silibinin. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15010019

AMA Style

Bosch-Barrera J, Roqué A, Teixidor E, Carmona-Garcia MC, Arbusà A, Brunet J, Martin-Castillo B, Cuyàs E, Verdura S, Menendez JA. Clinical Management of COVID-19 in Cancer Patients with the STAT3 Inhibitor Silibinin. Pharmaceuticals. 2022; 15(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bosch-Barrera, Joaquim, Ariadna Roqué, Eduard Teixidor, Maria Carmen Carmona-Garcia, Aina Arbusà, Joan Brunet, Begoña Martin-Castillo, Elisabet Cuyàs, Sara Verdura, and Javier A. Menendez. 2022. "Clinical Management of COVID-19 in Cancer Patients with the STAT3 Inhibitor Silibinin" Pharmaceuticals 15, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15010019

APA Style

Bosch-Barrera, J., Roqué, A., Teixidor, E., Carmona-Garcia, M. C., Arbusà, A., Brunet, J., Martin-Castillo, B., Cuyàs, E., Verdura, S., & Menendez, J. A. (2022). Clinical Management of COVID-19 in Cancer Patients with the STAT3 Inhibitor Silibinin. Pharmaceuticals, 15(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15010019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop