A Real-Time Mechanical Information Acquisition System and Finite Element Prediction Method for Limb Lengthening: A Pilot In Vivo Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Clinical Background: The Biomechanics of Distraction
1.2. Technological Gaps in Current Monitoring
1.3. Study Objectives
2. System Design and Mechanical Architecture
2.1. Biomechanical Design Requirements
2.2. Double-Ring Sensor Interface Topology
2.2.1. Structural Components
2.2.2. Sensor Configuration and Moment Decoupling
3. Theoretical Framework and Prediction Method
3.1. Continuum Mechanics Formulation
3.2. Ogden Constitutive Model
3.3. Computational Implementation
4. Validation Experiments and Results
4.1. In Vitro Metrological Calibration
4.2. Pilot In Vivo Animal Experiment
4.2.1. Preoperative Preparation and Surgery
4.2.2. Distraction Protocol
4.3. Results: Single-Subject Data vs. Prediction
5. Discussion and Conclusions
- Superior Measurement Stability: The “double-ring” sensor interface offers a distinct advantage over traditional monitoring methods regarding data stability. Previous systems relying on single-point sensors or strain gauges on fixator pins are highly susceptible to “cross-talk” errors caused by bending moments, often resulting in noisy data when the subject moves [18]. In contrast, our triangular three-sensor configuration creates a mechanically determinate plane that inherently decouples axial forces from bending moments. This design ensures that the acquired DRF data remains stable and accurate, even in the presence of eccentric loading caused by the animal’s posture or activity.
- Clinical Relevance for Large Lengthening: Clinically, surgical indication for limb lengthening is typically reserved for patients with a Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) greater than 2 cm. As demonstrated in our results, the DRF increases non-linearly; beyond 2 cm or 3 cm of lengthening, the tension generated by the soft tissue envelope escalates rapidly. This high tension poses a significant risk for the mechanical failure of the lengthening device, particularly for Intramedullary Nails (IMN), which may jam or fracture under excessive load [8]. Our FE model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy at these larger distraction distances (30–40 mm), precisely where the clinical risk is highest. This capability suggests that the proposed method is well-suited for preoperative planning in cases requiring substantial lengthening, potentially preventing hardware failure by predicting unsafe load thresholds.
- Evaluation of the Acute Distraction Protocol: It is important to acknowledge the limitations of the acute distraction protocol employed in this pilot study. By applying immediate, large-step distraction, the experiment does not account for the biological phenomenon of stress relaxation via tissue regeneration and growth (neohistogenesis) that occurs during clinical gradual lengthening. However, this experimental design was intentional and advantageous for the specific validation goals of this study. It effectively eliminated the confounding variable of callus formation (Callus Distraction Force), ensuring that the measured forces represented the pure mechanical response of the soft tissue envelope. This isolation was crucial for validating the accuracy of the hyperelastic FE model based on muscle volume.
- Predictive Accuracy and Muscle Volume: The FE model, utilizing a patient-specific Ogden constitutive law, accurately forecast distraction forces with an RMSE of 6.45 N. The high fidelity of the prediction validates the modeling strategy of prioritizing muscle volume reconstruction, confirming that skeletal muscle volume is the dominant factor determining the magnitude of Distraction Resisting Force. This finding suggests that future patient-specific models can focus primarily on muscle segmentation to achieve clinically relevant predictions.
- Potential Clinical Significance: This framework represents an exploratory step towards more precise distraction osteogenesis. Current clinical decision-making often relies on subjective markers, such as manual palpation or patient pain, which can be reactive. By integrating mechanical sensing with predictive modeling, this pilot study indicates the potential to transform the treatment approach from a generalized empirical protocol to a more individualized regime. Such a system could eventually help in defining a therapeutic safety window, potentially assisting surgeons in anticipating complications while allowing for future optimization of the distraction rate based on individual physiological tolerance.
- Future work will prioritize increasing the sample size of the in vivo study to better account for biological variation and ensure the robustness of the findings across different subjects. Additionally, future efforts will focus on integrating feedback control to realize a closed-loop intelligent external fixator [35]. Other researchers have also highlighted the potential of such systems for various applications [21,36].
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Birch, J.G. A brief history of limb lengthening. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2017, 37, S1–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hosny, G.A. Limb lengthening history, evolution, complications and current concepts. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2020, 21, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glatt, V.; Evans, C.H.; Tetsworth, K. A concert between biology and biomechanics: The influence of the mechanical environment on bone healing. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sheridan, G.A.; Fragomen, A.T.; Rozbruch, S.R. Integrated limb lengthening is superior to classical limb lengthening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. JAAOS Glob. Res. Rev. 2020, 4, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, B.; Charters, E.; Yoda, N.; Man, Z.; Manzie, T.; Parthasarathi, K.; Clark, J.R.; Li, Q.; Chang, L. Finite element analysis of biomechanical alterations in the temporomandibular joint following mandibular reconstruction. Friction 2024, 13, 9441013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatefi, S.; Etamadi, S.M.; Yihun, Y.; Mansouri, R.; Akhlaghi, A. Continuous distraction osteogenesis device with MAAC controller for mandibular reconstruction applications. Biomed. Eng. Online 2019, 18, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziz, A.U.A.; Ammarullah, M.I.; Ng, B.W.; Gan, H.-S.; Kadir, M.R.A.; Ramlee, M.H. Unilateral external fixator and its biomechanical effects in treating different types of femoral fracture: A finite element study with experimental validated model. Heliyon 2024, 10, e26131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bafor, A.; Iobst, C.A. What’s new in limb lengthening and deformity correction. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2022, 104, 1419–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iliadis, A.D.M.; Palloni, V.M.; Wright, J.F.T.; Goodier, D.F.T.; Calder, P.F.T. Pediatric lower limb lengthening using the PRECICE nail: Our experience with 50 cases. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2021, 41, e44–e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelini, A.; Baracco, R.; Dolci, A.; Vigo, M.; Mavrogenis, A.F.; Ruggieri, P. Limb lengthening for deformities in Ollier’s disease: A systematic review. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2020, 30, 1325–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheridan, G.A.; Falk, D.P.; Fragomen, A.T.; Rozbruch, S.R. Motorized internal limb-lengthening (MILL) techniques are superior to alternative limb-lengthening techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. JBJS Open Access 2020, 5, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calder, P.R.; McKay, J.E.; Timms, A.J.; Roskrow, T.; Fugazzotto, S.; Edel, P.; Goodier, W.D. Femoral lengthening using the Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system: Outcome comparison following antegrade and retrograde nails. Bone Jt. J. 2019, 101, 1168–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Nie, Z.; Xu, H.; Hu, K.; Gong, Z.; Meng, Q.; Xie, F.; Liu, X.-J. Design and optimization of a novel intramedullary robot for limb lengthening. In International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 103–112. [Google Scholar]
- Mora-Macías, J.; Reina-Romo, E.; López-Pliego, M.; Giráldez-Sánchez, M.A.; Domínguez, J. In Vivo Mechanical Characterization of the Distraction Callus During Bone Consolidation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 43, 2663–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mora-Macías, J.; Reina-Romo, E.; Domínguez, J. Model of the distraction callus tissue behavior during bone transport based in experiments in vivo. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016, 61, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shu, L.; Yamamoto, K.; Yao, J.; Saraswat, P.; Liu, Y.; Mitsuishi, M.; Sugita, N. A subject-specific finite element musculoskeletal framework for mechanics analysis of a total knee replacement. J. Biomech. 2018, 77, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, S.; Hase, K.; Funato, T. Computational prediction of muscle synergy using a finite element framework for a musculoskeletal model of the lower limb. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1130219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calder, P.R.; Laubscher, M.; Goodier, W.D. The role of the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening. Injury 2017, 48, S52–S58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Ramlawi, A.; Assayag, M.; McClure, P. PRECICE nail bending in femur lengthening. J. Orthop. 2024, 56, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blázquez-Carmona, P.; Sánchez-Raya, M.; Mora-Macías, J.; Gómez-Galán, J.A.; Domínguez, J.; Reina-Romo, E. Real-Time Wireless Platform for In Vivo Monitoring of Bone Regeneration. Sensors 2020, 20, 4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, C.; Wang, L.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, L. A low-power wireless monitoring system for bone healing. Sensors 2019, 19, 2147. [Google Scholar]
- Schulz, A.P.; Kowald, B.; Münch, M.; Seide, K.; Weinrich, N.; Barth, T.; Kienast, B. Long-Term Evaluation of Bone Healing Monitoring Using an Instrumented Plate with Measurement Sensors. Sensors 2025, 25, 5779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bliven, E.K.; Greinwald, M.; Hackl, S.; Augat, P. External fixation of the lower extremities: Biomechanical perspective and recent innovations. Injury 2019, 50, S10–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramlee, M.H.; Al-Tam, B.Y.; Wahab, A.A.; Gan, H.S.; Abdullah, A.H. A review on finite element modelling and simulation for upper limb of human bone and implant. Malays. J. Med. Health Sci. 2023, 19, 325–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, H.; Zhen, P.; Hou, J.; Qin, W.; Liu, J.; Pan, K.; Jack, G.; Nie, X.; Hua, Q.; Zhao, J. Finite element analysis safety of tibial cortex transverse transport. Bone Jt. Res. 2025, 14, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamani, A.; Zenios, M.; Oyadiji, S.O. Rings in Taylor Spatial Frame: Mechanical testing and finite element analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med. 2025, 239, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, D.B.; Vijayakumar, K.; Abhinesh; Martin, A.V.; George, R. Review of biomechanical characteristics of Illizarov ring fixators using FEA. Iop Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 993, 012037. [Google Scholar]
- Rabbi, M.F.; Pizzolato, C.; Lloyd, D.G.; Carty, C.P.; Devaprakash, D.; Diamond, L.E. Non-negative matrix factorisation is the most appropriate method for extraction of muscle synergies in walking and running. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bachmeier, A.; Euler, E.; Bader, R.; Böcker, W.; Thaller, P. Novel approach to estimate distraction forces. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2022, 128, 105133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shourijeh, M.S.; Flaxman, T.E.; Benoit, D.L. An approach for improving repeatability and reliability of non-negative matrix factorization for muscle synergy analysis. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2013, 26, 36–43. [Google Scholar]
- Lambert-Shirzad, N.; Van der Loos, H.F.M. On identifying kinematic and muscle synergies: A comparison of matrix factorization methods using experimental data from the healthy population. J. Neurosci. 2017, 117, 290–302. [Google Scholar]
- Iobst, C.A.; Mohammed, W.; Colley, R. Determining when it is safe to remove the external fixator: Results from a survey of the limb lengthening and reconstruction society. Orthopedics 2017, 40, e876–e879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lienemann, P.S.; Metzger, S.; Kiveliö, A.-S.; Blanc, A.; Papageorgiou, P.; Astolfo, A.; Pinzer, B.R.; Cinelli, P.; Weber, F.E.; Schibli, R.; et al. Longitudinal in vivo evaluation of bone regeneration by combined measurement of multi-pinhole SPECT and micro-CT for tissue engineering. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steiner, M.; Ignatius, A.; Claes, L.; Wehner, T. Comparison of mechanical properties of bone and callus in osteoporotic sheep. J. Orthop. Res. 2015, 33, 1164–1171. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.J.; Nie, Z.; Wang, T.; Xu, Y.; Su, B.; Chen, Y.; Yang, H. Digital twin-assisted orthopedic surgical system for real-time biomechanical guidance. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2023, 240, 107674. [Google Scholar]
- Hinz, N.; Stacenko, K.; Lutz, C.; Schulz, A.-P.; Wendlandt, R. Lateral cortical notching facilitates dynamization of proximal femoral nailing—A finite element analysis. Injury 2023, 54, 111009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]







| Distraction Step | Measured Force (N) | Predicted Force (N) | Absolute Error (N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 mm | 58.4 | 50.32 | 8.08 |
| 10 mm | 105.2 | 95.89 | 9.31 |
| 15 mm | 154.0 | 148.35 | 5.65 |
| 20 mm | 215.6 | 210.10 | 5.50 |
| 30 mm | 345.2 | 348.50 | 3.30 |
| 40 mm | 485.5 | 482.10 | 3.40 |
| Overall RMSE | 6.45 N |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yang, H.; Peng, T.; Han, Y.; Lu, M.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Z. A Real-Time Mechanical Information Acquisition System and Finite Element Prediction Method for Limb Lengthening: A Pilot In Vivo Study. Sensors 2026, 26, 1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061950
Yang H, Peng T, Han Y, Lu M, Chen Y, Yang Z. A Real-Time Mechanical Information Acquisition System and Finite Element Prediction Method for Limb Lengthening: A Pilot In Vivo Study. Sensors. 2026; 26(6):1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061950
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Hao, Tairan Peng, Yuyang Han, Ming Lu, Yunzhi Chen, and Zheng Yang. 2026. "A Real-Time Mechanical Information Acquisition System and Finite Element Prediction Method for Limb Lengthening: A Pilot In Vivo Study" Sensors 26, no. 6: 1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061950
APA StyleYang, H., Peng, T., Han, Y., Lu, M., Chen, Y., & Yang, Z. (2026). A Real-Time Mechanical Information Acquisition System and Finite Element Prediction Method for Limb Lengthening: A Pilot In Vivo Study. Sensors, 26(6), 1950. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26061950
