Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part II
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Augmented and Virtual Reality
3.1.1. Mining Engineering
3.1.2. Civil Engineering
3.2. Innovation Personal Protective Equipment and Collective Protective Equipment
3.2.1. Mining Engineering
3.2.2. Civil Engineering
3.3. Exoskeletons
3.3.1. Mining Engineering
3.3.2. Civil Engineering
4. Evaluation of Modern Technologies for Improving Occupational Safety
4.1. General Characteristics and Future Research Directions
4.1.1. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality
- Developing more advanced simulation models that take into account a greater number of environmental variables and dynamic human–machine interactions;
- Personalization of training with the use of artificial intelligence, which can adapt training scenarios to the individual needs and level of competence of users;
- Integration of VR/AR systems with Internet of Things and Big Data technologies, which will enable the creation of intelligent systems for warning and predicting threats in real time;
- Assessment of the long-term impact of the use of VR and AR on work efficiency and psychophysical health of employees;
- Analysis of ethical and legal aspects related to the use of virtual and augmented reality technology, including data privacy issues, liability for system errors, as well as technical and quality standards.
4.1.2. Innovative Personal Protective Equipment and Collective Protective Equipment
- Developing environmentally resilient protective systems that will be able to operate reliably in extreme conditions of the working environment;
- The development of universal systems for the integration of data from various sources (sensors, cameras, biological data) in order to create coherent safety management systems;
- Research on the psychological and social aspects of the acceptance of new collective and individual protection measures by employees and the development of effective training and implementation strategies.
4.1.3. Exoskeletons
- Research on the long-term impact of their use on the health of employees, including the analysis of biomechanical and adaptive changes in the body;
- The development of technologies enabling individual adjustment of exoskeletons to the body structure of the user and the specifics of the tasks performed;
- The integration of exoskeletons with health and work environment monitoring systems, which will enable the creation of a comprehensive employee protection system.
4.2. Inter-Technological Integration—Opportunities and Limitations
4.2.1. Opportunities on the Use and Mixing of Modern Technologies
4.2.2. Limitations on the Use and Mixing of Modern Technologies
4.2.3. Practical Ways to Reduce the Risks on the Use and Mixing of Modern Technologies
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
OSH | Occupational Safety and Health |
AR | Augmented Reality |
VR | Virtual Reality |
PPE | Personal Protective Equipment |
CPE | Collective Protective Equipment |
EMS | Emergency Medical Services |
IoT | Internet of Things |
BIM | Building Information Modelling |
WRMSDs | work-related musculoskeletal disorders |
References
- Al-Bayati, A.J. Impact of Construction Safety Culture and Construction Safety Climate on Safety Behavior and Safety Motivation. Safety 2021, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidani, A.; Poças Martins, J.; Soeiro, A. Catalysing Construction Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Technological Advancements across High-Risk Industries. Buildings 2023, 13, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haleem, A.; Javaid, M.; Singh, R.P. Encouraging Safety 4.0 to enhance industrial culture: An extensive study of its technologies, roles, and challenges. Green Technol. Sustain. 2025, 3, 100158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arana-Landín, G.; Laskurain-Iturbe, I.; Iturrate, M.; Landeta-Manzano, B. Assessing the influence of industry 4.0 technologies on occupational health and safety. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berglund, L.; Johansson, J.; Johansson, M.; Nygren, M.; Stenberg, M. Exploring safety culture research in the construction industry. WORK 2023, 76, 549–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guzman, J.; Recoco, G.A.; Pandi, A.W.; Padrones, J.M.; Ignacio, J.J. Evaluating workplace safety in the oil and gas industry during the COVID-19 pandemic using occupational health and safety Vulnerability Measure and partial least square Structural Equation Modelling. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 6, 100378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bęś, P.; Strzałkowski, P. Analysis of the Effectiveness of Safety Training Methods. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Protasenko, O.; Mygal, G.; Kobrina, N.; Mykhailova, E. Ergonomic thinking in the design of human-machine systems. Bull. Natl. Tech. Univ. «KhPI» Ser. New Solut. Mod. Technol. 2023, 1, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, N. Desk research. In How to Do Research: The Practical Guide to Designing and Managing Research Projects; Facet: London, UK, 2006; pp. 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Topolewski, S.; Górnikiewicz, M.; Stawarz, P. The literature review and the “desk research” methods in studies conducted in social sciences with particular emphasis on security, political, and international relations studies. Stud. Wschod. 2023, 2, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednarowska, Z. Desk research—Wykorzystanie potencjału danych zastanych w prowadzeniu badań marketingowych i społecznych. Zesz. Prasozn. 2013, 56, 60–74. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta, R.K. Methodological and Theoretical Rigor in Desk Research. ResearchGate. 2024. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net (accessed on 19 May 2025).
- Azhar, S. Role of visualization technologies in safety planning and management at construction jobsites. Procedia Eng. 2017, 171, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yap, J.B.H.; Lee, K.P.H.; Wang, C. Safety enablers using emerging technologies in construction projects: Empirical study in Malaysia. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2023, 21, 1414–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strzałkowski, P.; Bęś, P.; Szóstak, M.; Napiórkowski, M. Application of Virtual Reality (VR) Technology in Mining and Civil Engineering. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eiris, R.; Gheisari, M.; Esmaeili, B. PARS: Using augmented 360-degree panoramas of reality for construction safety training. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lukhele, B.N.; Laseinde, O.T. Exploring Mechanical Engineering Equipment at TVET Colleges in South Africa, Towards Integrating Virtual and Cyber-Physical Learning. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2024, 232, 2690–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellanca, J.L.; Orr, T.J.; Helfrich, W.J.; Macdonald, B.; Navoyski, J.; Demich, B. Developing a Virtual Reality Environment for Mining Research. Min. Metall. Explor. 2019, 36, 597–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assfalg, J.; Del Bimbo, A.; Vicario, E. Using 3D and Ancillary Media to Train Construction Workers. IEEE Multimed. 2002, 9, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stothard, P.; Laurence, D. Application of a large-screen immersive visualisation system to demonstrate sustainable mining practices principles. Min. Technol. 2014, 123, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Choi, Y. Performance Comparison of User Interface Devices for Controlling Mining Software in Virtual Reality Environments. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedram, S.; Palmisano, S.; Miellet, S.; Farrelly, M.; Perez, P. Influence of age and industry experience on learning experiences and outcomes in virtual reality mines rescue training. Front. Virtual Real. 2022, 3, 941225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitra, R.; Saydam, S. Using Virtual Reality In Tertiary Education. Int. J. Technol. Learn. 2013, 19, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Liu, L.; Qi, X.; Geng, J. Digital Mining Technology-Based Teaching Mode for Mining Engineering. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2016, 11, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H. Head-mounted display-based intuitive virtual reality training system for the mining industry. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2017, 27, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorey, F.; Knights, P.F. Quantifying the benefits of simulator training for dragline operators. Min. Technol. 2015, 124, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, J.; Lu, G. Research on key techniques of virtual reality applied in mining industry. J. Coal Sci. Eng. China 2009, 15, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMahon, M.; Garrett, M. Computer-Generated Three-Dimensional Training Environments: The Simulation, User, and Problem-Based Learning SUPL Approach. Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simul. 2010, 2, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathy, D. Virtual reality and its applications in mining industry. J. Mines Met. Fuels 2014, 62, 184–195. [Google Scholar]
- Onifade, M.; Said, K.O.; Shivute, A.P. Safe mining operations through technological advancement. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 175, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaum, A.; Nieto, A.; Karmis, M.; Schafrik, S.J. Haul Truck Safety and Virtual Environments Training. Min. Eng. 2008, 60, 56–60. [Google Scholar]
- Webber-Youngman, R.C.W.; van Wyk, E.A. Incident Reconstruction Simulations-Potential Impact on the Prevention of Future Mine Incidents. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2013, 113, 519–528. [Google Scholar]
- Nickel, C.; Knight, C.; Langille, A.; Godwin, A. How Much Practice Is Required to Reduce Performance Variability in a Virtual Reality Mining Simulator? Safety 2019, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gürer, S.; Surer, E.; Erkayaŏglu, M. Mining-Virtual: A Comprehensive Virtual Reality-Based Serious Game for Occupational Health and Safety Training in Underground Mines. Saf. Sci. 2023, 166, 106226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whyte, J.; Bouchlaghem, N.; Thorpe, A.; McCaffer, R. From CAD to Virtual Reality: Modelling Approaches, Data Exchange and Interactive 3D Building Design Tools. Autom. Constr. 2000, 10, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whyte, J. Industrial Applications of Virtual Reality in Architecture and Construction. Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2003, 8, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrucali, E.; Demirkesen, S.; Sadikoglu, E.; Zhang, C.; Damci, A. Investigating the impact of emerging technologies on construction safety performance. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2022, 31, 1322–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acuña, L.A.; Rojas, B.H.; Reyes, H.P.; Arabia, J.H.; Piñero Pérez, P.Y.; Pupo, I.P. Systematic Review of Augmented Reality (AR) and Bim for the Management of Deadlines, Costs and Quality. In Computational Intelligence in Engineering and Project Management; Piñero Pérez, P.Y., Kacprzyk, J., Bello Pérez, R., Pupo, I.P., Eds.; Studies in Computational Intelligence; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; Volume 1134, pp. 89–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eiris, R.; Jain, A.; Gheisari, M.; Wehle, A. Safety immersive storytelling using narrated 360-degree panoramas: A fall hazard training within the electrical trade context. Saf. Sci. 2020, 127, 104703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rwamamara, R.; Norberg, H.; Olofsson, T.; Lagerqvist, O. Using visualization technologies for design and planning of a healthy construction workplace. Constr. Innov. 2010, 10, 248–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, Q.T.; Pedro, A.; Park, C.S. A Social Virtual Reality Based Construction Safety Education System for Experiential Learning. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2015, 79, 487–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Z.; Zhou, K.; Gao, K. Development of Virtual Reality Serious Game for Underground Rock-Related Hazards Safety Training. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 118639–118649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hethmon, T.A. Development of an Industrial Hygiene Program at a New Copper Mine in Chile. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 1997, 12, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakti, M.; Nirmalawati; Tawil, S. Analysis of the causes of occupational accidents in nickel mining activities in Morowali. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2022, 17, 1630–1638. [Google Scholar]
- Qiao, H. Research on the Application of Digital Twin Model Calculation and Updating Methods in Mining Engineering. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 2024, 391, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia Gonzalez, H.; García-Ordiales, E.; Diez, R.R. Analysis of the airborne mercury and particulate arsenic levels close to an abandoned waste dump and buildings of a mercury mine and the potential risk of atmospheric pollution. SN Appl. Sci. 2022, 4, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adjiski, V.; Despodov, Z.; Mirakovski, D.; Serafimovski, D. System architecture to bring smart personal protective equipment wearables and sensors to transform safety at work in the underground mining industry. Rud. Geol. Naft. Zb. 2019, 34, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, N.; Gunjan, K.; Chaudhary, G.; Kaluri, R.; Victor, N.; Lakshmanna, K. IoT enabled HELMET to safeguard the health of mine workers. Comput. Commun. 2022, 193, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nipun, D.; Nath, A.; Behzadan, H.; Paal, S.G. Deep learning for site safety: Real-time detection of personal protective equipment. Autom. Constr. 2020, 112, 103085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahadi, M.K.; Rahad, R.; Mobassir, M.S.; Rahman, A.; Shafiullah, A.; Nishat, M.M. Implementation of Personal Safety Equipment Tracking&Detection by DeepSORT&YOLOv8. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), Lalitpur, Nepal, 24–26 April 2024; pp. 1969–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calle, R.; Aguilar, E. An Uncertainty-Driven ScaledYOLOv4 for Open-Pit Mining Helmet Detection. In Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications; Hernández-García, R., Barrientos, R.J., Velastin, S.A., Eds.; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 74–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imam, M.; Baïna, K.; Tabii, Y.; Ressami, E.M.; Adlaoui, Y.; Boufousse, S.; Benzakour, I.; Abdelwahed, E.H. Integrating real-time pose estimation and PPE detection with cutting-edge deep learning for enhanced safety and rescue operations in the mining industry. Neurocomputing 2025, 618, 129080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Günther, F.; Mischo, H.; Lösch, R.; Grehl, S.; Güth, F. Increased safety in deep mining with IoT and autonomous robots. In Mining Goes Digital; Mueller, C., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2019; p. 603. ISBN 978-0-367-33604-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagarajapandian, M.; Ishana, A.; Jeevika, K.; Jefina, S.J.; Arun Mozhi Devan, P. Health & Environment Monitoring and Alerting System for Mine Workers: From Proof of Concept to Experimental Validation. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Sensors and Nanotechnology (SENNANO), Putrajaya, Malaysia, 26–27 September 2023; pp. 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godwin, A.A.; Eger, T.R. Ergonomic and usability ratings of helmets and head-mounted personal protective equipment in industry. Work 2014, 47, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Szkudlarek, J.; Owczarek, G.; Jachowicz, M.; Zagrodny, B.; Sencerek, J. Study of The Impact of Users’ Features on Dimensional Allowances Resulting from the Use of Personal Protective Equipment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Huang, X.; Hinze, J. Analysis of construction worker fall accidents. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2003, 129, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spierings, A.B.; Stämpfli, R. Methodology for the development of an energy absorber: Application to worker security ropes. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2006, 32, 1370–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogovski, S.; Lang, I.; Rjazanov, V.; Muzyka, V.; Tuulik, V.; Vitak, A. Assessment of potential hazards during the process of house building in Estonia. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2007, 17, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ulubeyli, S.; Kazaz, A.; Er, B. Health and safety perception of workers in Turkey: A survey of construction sites. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2014, 20, 323–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anveden Berglind, I.; Lind, M.L.; Lidén, C. Epoxy pipe relining—An emerging contact allergy risk for workers. Contact Dermat. 2012, 67, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bello, A.; Xue, Y.; Gore, R.; Woskie, S.; Bello, D. Exposures and urinary biomonitoring of aliphatic isocyanates in construction metal structure coating. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2020, 226, 113495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teizer, J.J. Wearable, wireless identification sensing platform: Self-Monitoring Alert and Reporting Technology for Hazard Avoidance and Training (SmartHat). Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2015, 20, 295–312. [Google Scholar]
- Lo, J.-H.; Lin, L.-K.; Hung, C.-C. Real-Time Personal Protective Equipment Compliance Detection Based on Deep Learning Algorithm. Sustainability 2023, 15, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bodtländer, C.; Helmus, M.; Kelm, A.; Meins-Becker, A. BIM-Processes-Health & Safety. In Proceedings of the International Structural Engineering and Construction, Valencia, Spain, 24–29 July 2017; Volume 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borjan, M.; Patel, T.; Lefkowitz, D.; Campbell, C.; Lumia, M. Assessing Barriers to the Use of Fall Protection in Small Residential Construction Companies in New Jersey. A J. Environ. Occup. Health Policy 2015, 26, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simpeh, F.; Bamfo-Agyei, E.; Amoah, C. Barriers to the implementation of COVID-19 safety regulations: Insight from Ghanaian construction sites. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2022, 20, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolegraff, S.; Parrotta, K. Safety First Means Safety Fits: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Gender and Personal Protective Equipment Feminist Hackathon. New Trends Qual. Res. 2023, 16, e790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okunola, A.; Afolabi, A.; Akanmu, A.; Jebelli, H.; Simikins, S. Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry. J. Saf. Res. 2024, 90, 402–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okunola, A.; Akanmu, A.; Jebelli, H. Fall risk assessment of active back-support exoskeleton-use for construction work using foot plantar pressure distribution. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2024, 62, 102626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Khiami, M.I.; Lindhard, S.M.; Wandahl, S. Charting the Exoskeleton Industry: A Comprehensive Insight into Dynamics and Trends. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2024, 1389, 012014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Q.; Tan, G.; Chen, Q.; Wu, G.; Xi, T.; An, C. Design of topological configuration and key technologies for mining exoskeleton robots: Application and prospects of level set algorithm. Proc. SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2024, 13275, 1327532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Athar, A.; Vigilio, F.; Werner, S.; Sunil, A.K. Systematic Review of Back-Support Exoskeletons and Soft Robotic Suits. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 765257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Looze, M.P.; de Bosch, T.; Krause, F.; Stadler, K.S.; O’Sullivan, L.W. Exoskeletons for Industrial Application and Their Potential Effects on Physical Work Load. Ergonomics 2015, 59, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwasel, A.; Elrayes, K.; Abdel-Rahman, E.; Haas, C. Reducing shoulder injuries among construction workers. In Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium of Automation and Robotics in Construction, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 26–29 June 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golabchi, A.; Miller, L.; Rouhani, H.; Tavakoli, M. Impact of Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons on Manual Material Handling Postures in Construction. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Bogotá, Colombia, 13–15 July 2022; pp. 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linner, T.; Pan, M.; Pan, W.; Taghavi, M.; Pan, W.; Bock, T. Identification of usage scenarios for robotic exoskeletons in the context of the Hong Kong construction industry. In Proceedings of the ISARC 2018—35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and International AEC/FM Hackathon: The Future of Building Things, Berlin, Germany, 20–25 July 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capitani, S.L.; Bianchi, M.; Secciani, N.; Pagliai, M.; Meli, E.; Ridolfi, A. Model-based mechanical design of a passive lower-limb exoskeleton for assisting workers in shotcrete projection. Meccanica 2021, 56, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonsalves, N.J.; Ogunseiju, O.R.; Akanmu, A.A.; Nnaji, C.A. Assessment of a passive wearable robot for reducing low back disorders during rebar work. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2021, 26, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonsalves, N.J.; Khalid, M.; Akinniyi, A.; Akanmu, A. Industry Perspectives of the Potential of Wearable Robot for Pipe Installation Work. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Bogotá, Colombia, 13–15 July 2022; pp. 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonsalves, N.J.; Khalid, M.; Akinniyi, A.; Ogunseiju, O.; Akanmu, A. Subjective Evaluation of Passive Back-Support Wearable Robot for Simulated Rebar Work. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Bogotá, Colombia, 13–15 July 2022; pp. 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, S.T.; Han, W.; Mahmud, D.; Adamczyk, P.G.; Dai, F.; Wehner, M.; Veeramani, D.; Zhu, Z. Usability and Biomechanical Testing of Passive Exoskeletons for Construction Workers: A Field-Based Pilot Study. Buildings 2023, 13, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojha, A.; Gautam, Y.; Jebelli, H.; Akanmu, A. Physiological impact of powered back-support exoskeletons in construction: Analyzing muscle fatigue, metabolic cost, ergonomic risks, and stability. Autom. Constr. 2024, 168(Pt A), 105742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Gautam, Y.; Ojha, A.; Shayesteh, S.; Jebelli, H. Studying the Effects of Back-Support Exoskeletons on Workers’ Cognitive Load during Material Handling Tasks. Constr. Res. Congr. 2024, 1, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breneman, M.; Ojha, A.; Jebelli, H.; Simkins, S.J.; Akanmu, A. Breaking down barriers: A study of challenges to adopting powered exoskeletons in the US construction industry. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2023: Data, Sensing, and Analytics—Selected Papers from the ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering; ASCE Press: Reston, VA, USA, 2023; pp. 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunson-Todd, M.; Nik-Bakht, M.; Hammad, A. Experimental Evaluation of Exoskeletons for Rebar Workers Using a Realistic Controlled Test. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Lille, France, 3–5 June 2024; pp. 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baltrusch, S.J.; Krause, F.; de Vries, A.W.; de Looze, M.P. Arm-support exoskeleton reduces shoulder muscle activity in ceiling construction. Ergonomics 2024, 67, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nnaji, C.; Ibrahim, A.; Okpala, I. Semi-Active Exoskeletons for Forearm Muscle Strain Reduction. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2023: Resilience, Safety, and Sustainability—Selected Papers from the ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering; ASCE Press: Reston, VA, USA, 2023; pp. 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mänttäri, S.; Rauttola, A.P.; Halonen, J.; Karkulehto, J.; Säynäjäkangas, P.; Oksa, J. Effects of upper-limb exoskeleton on muscle activity in tasks requiring arm elevation: Part II—In-field experiments in construction industry settings. Work 2024, 79, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, A.; Okpala, I.; Nnaji, C.; Akanmu, A. Effects of using an active hand exoskeleton for drilling tasks: A pilot study. J. Saf. Res. 2024, 90, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, B.B.; Somasundram, K.G.; Johnston, A.; Bigelow, P.; Abdoli-Eramaki, M.; Jordan, K.H.; Yung, M.; Yazdani, A. Skilled Workers’ Perspectives on Utilizing a Passive Shoulder Exoskeleton in Construction. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seo, H.; Pooladvand, S.; Aslanli, A.; Hasanzadeh, S.; Esmaeili, B. Cognitive Impact of Wearing an Exoskeleton on Hazard Identification Performance of Construction Workers. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2023: Resilience, Safety, and Sustainability—Selected Papers from the ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering; ASCE Press: Reston, VA, USA, 2023; pp. 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akanmu, A.; Okunola, A.; Jebelli, H.; Ammar, A.; Afolabi, A. Cognitive load assessment of active back-support exoskeletons in construction: A case study on construction framing. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2024, 62, 102905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afolabi, A.; Yusuf, A.; Akanmu, A. Predicting mental workload of using exoskeletons for construction work: A deep learning approach. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2025, 30, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, L.; Pan, C.; Wei, L.; Bahreinizad, H.; Chowdhury, S.; Ning, X.; Santos, F. Shoulder-assist exoskeleton effects on balance and muscle activity during a block-laying task on a simulated mast climber. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2024, 104, 103652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubenstone, J. Mixing Reality on Site. ENR 2016, 277, 20–24. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Yi, W.; Chi, H.-L.; Wang, X.; Chan, A.P.C. A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Autom. Constr. 2018, 86, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, C.; Kim, H.; Cho, Y.K. Framework of automated construction-safety monitoring using cloud-enabled BIM and BLE mobile tracking sensors. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2019, 145, 04018076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.; Ma, L.; Xu, C.; Liu, Y. Application of augmented reality to improve mine safety: A case study in a coal mine. Saf. Sci. 2021, 134, 105093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Whyte, J.; Sacks, R. Construction safety and digital design: A review. Autom. Constr. 2012, 22, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Omrany, H.; Al-Obaidi, K.M.; Husain, A.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A. Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Current Implementations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saah, A.E.N.; Yee, J.-J.; Choi, J.-H. Securing Construction Workers’ Data Security and Privacy with Blockchain Technology. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 13339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giaretta, A. Security and Privacy in Virtual Reality: A Literature Survey. Virtual Real. 2025, 29, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hine, E.; Rezende, I.; Roberts, H.; Wong, D.; Taddeo, M.; Floridi, L. Safety and Privacy in Immersive Extended Reality: An Analysis and Policy Recommendations. Digit. Soc. 2024, 3, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roesner, F.; Kohno, T.; Molnar, D. Security and Privacy for Augmented Reality Systems. Commun. ACM 2014, 57, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharjee, S.; Joshi, R.K.; Chughtai, A.A.; Macintyre, C.R. Graphene Modified Multifunctional Personal Protective Clothing. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Narayan Senapati, J.; Sharma, V.; Singh Choudhary, A. Technological Advancements in Personal Protective Equipment: A Future Perspective. Health Leadersh. Qual. Life 2022, 1, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flor-Unda, O.; Casa, B.; Fuentes, M.; Solorzano, S.; Narvaez-Espinoza, F.; Acosta-Vargas, P. Exoskeletons: Contribution to Occupational Health and Safety. Bioengineering 2023, 10, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botti, L.; Melloni, R. Occupational Exoskeletons: Understanding the Impact on Workers and Suggesting Guidelines for Practitioners and Future Research Needs. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fross, K.; Szuliński, T.; Fross, R. Mieszana rzeczywistość w projektowaniu BIM i inspekcjach budowli. BUILDER 2022, 305, 8–11. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pawłowska, Z. Szanse i zagrożenia dla bezpieczeństwa i higieny pracy związane z wdrażaniem w przedsiębiorstwach technologii Przemysłu 4.0. Occup. Safety. Sci. Pract. 2021, 603, 24–28. (In Polish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Getuli, V.; Capone, P.; Bruttini, A.; Isaac, S. BIM-Based Immersive Virtual Reality for Construction Workspace Planning: A Safety-Oriented Approach. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, W.; Ding, L.; Luo, H.; Love, P.E.D. Falls from Heights: A Computer Vision-Based Approach for Safety Harness Detection. Autom. Constr. 2018, 91, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Cai, N.; Chen, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, G. Automatic Detection of Hardhats Worn by Construction Personnel: A Deep Learning Approach and Benchmark Dataset. Autom. Constr. 2019, 106, 102894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W. Research on the Application of Intelligent Technology in Mining Safety Monitoring. Highlights Sci. Eng. Technol. 2024, 106, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodoo, J.E.; Al-Samarraie, H.; Alzahrani, A.I.; Lonsdale, M.; Alalwan, N. Digital Innovations for Occupational Safety: Empowering Workers in Hazardous Environments. Workplace Health Saf. 2024, 72, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, P.; Murthy, V.M.S.R.; Kumar, D.; Raval, S. A Comprehensive Review on Application of Drone, Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality with Their Application in Dragline Excavation Monitoring in Surface Mines. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2024, 15, 2327399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez, J.; Barakos, G.; Stothard, P.; Acosta Quelopana, A.M. Mining Metaverse—Identifying Safety and Commercial Risks in Mining Operations. Mining 2025, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Codoceo-Contreras, L.; Rybak, N.; Hassall, M. Exploring the impacts of automation in the mining industry: A systematic review using natural language processing. Min. Technol. 2024, 133, 191–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Häikiö, J.; Kallio, J.; Mäkelä, S.; Keränen, J.S. Iot-based safety monitoring from the perspective of construction site workers. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Saf. 2020, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Ye, S.; Lin, L. Process monitoring with support of iot in prefabricated building construction. Sens. Mater. 2021, 33, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howard, J.; Murashov, V.V.; Lowe, B.D.; Lu, M.-L. Industrial Exoskeletons: Need for Intervention Effectiveness Research. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2020, 63, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, E.W. Barriers to the Use of Personal Protective Equipment. In Occupational Health and Safety Management; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209587 (accessed on 1 September 2025).
- Okunola, A.; Akanmu, A.; Jebelli, H. Detection of Cognitive Loads during Exoskeleton Use for Construction Flooring Work. In Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress, Des Moines, IA, USA, 20–23 March 2024; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2024; pp. 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govaerts, R.; Turcksin, T.; Vanderborght, B.; Roelands, B.; Meeusen, R.; De Pauw, K.; De Bock, S. Evaluating Cognitive and Physical Work Performance: A Comparative Study of an Active and Passive Industrial Back-Support Exoskeleton. Wearable Technol. 2023, 4, e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Technology | Keywords | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mining Engineering | Results | Civil Engineering | Results | |
Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) | VR OR virtual reality OR AR OR augmented reality AND mining engineering OR mining AND occupational safety | 31 | VR OR virtual reality OR AR OR augmented reality AND civil engineering OR construction industry AND occupational safety | 29 |
Innovative personal protective equipment (PPE) and collective protective equipment (CPE) | new OR modern OR innovative AND personal protective equipment OR individual protective equipment OR collective protective equipment OR group protective equipment AND mining OR mining engineering | 22 | new OR modern OR innovative AND personal protective equipment OR individual protective equipment OR collective protective equipment OR group protective equipment AND civil engineering OR construction industry | 41 |
Exoskeletons | exoskeleton AND mining OR mining engineering | 2 | exoskeleton AND construction industry OR civil engineering | 29 |
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Inspection Robots | IoT and Sensors | Artificial Intelligence | Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) | Innovative Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and Collective Protective Equipment (CPE) | Exoskeletons | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Opportunities | ||||||
Exoskeletons | Management of hazardous and emergency situations | Biomechanical data analysis; Health and fatigue monitoring; Physical and ergonomic support | Assist with high-risk physical work; Motor support; Managing fatigue and interruptions | Haptic feedback; Synchronisation of motion data | Motion support and increased worker safety | |
Innovative personal protective equipment (PPE) and collective protective equipment (CPE) | Real-time monitoring and risk assessment | Monitor and analyse the work environment in real time; Manage the operation and condition of protective equipment; Responding to hazardous and accident situations; Data analysis and prediction of hazards and accidents | Creating smart PPE and CPE; Automation of collective protection system | Compatibility of purpose with actual activities performed; Test simulations of PPE and CPE. | Lack of standards and norms; Compatibility problems with security systems | |
Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) | Creating realistic 3D environments; Reconstructing accidents; Monitoring working conditions and identifying hazards; Use of real-time AR in work environments | Integrating data from IoT devices into a VR environment; Industrial training and simulation | Machine learning for VR environment adaptation; Personalization of VR/AR scenarios; Analysis of user response behaviour of VR/AR technologies; Risk assessment | A false sense of security; Ergonomic and health problems | Cybersecurity Threats; Technical errors and physical consequences | |
Artificial intelligence | Monitoring working conditions and identifying hazards; Predicting accidents and failures; Mapping and 3D modelling of the work environment | Real-time monitoring and analysis of the work environment; Predicting accidents and failures; Access control and employee identification | Algorithmic errors; Improper data analysis; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Qualified personnel requirement | Algorithmic errors; Improper data analysis; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat | Algorithmic errors and improper data analysis; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; The complexity of technology integration | |
IoT and sensors | Real-time monitoring of the work environment; Remote inspection and control of hazardous sites; Data analysis and prediction of hazards and accidents | Reducing employee vigilance; AI misinterpretation of data; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; Ethical and legal issues | Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat | Unreliability of technology; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; Need for qualified personnel | A false sense of security; Unreliability of technology; Cybersecurity threat; The complexity of technology integration | |
Unmanned aerial vehicles and inspection robots | Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; The complexity of technology integration; Unreliability of technology; Dependencies on communication systems | Algorithmic errors; Improper data analysis; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Cybersecurity threat; The complexity of technology integration | A false sense of security; Technical issues and hardware compatibility; Cybersecurity threat; Data leakage; Invasion of privacy; Need for qualified personnel | A false sense of security; Compatibility issues; Cybersecurity threat | Lack of standards and norms; Threats to cybersecurity; Complexity of technology integration | |
Limitations |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Bęś, P.; Strzałkowski, P.; Górniak-Zimroz, J.; Szóstak, M.; Janiszewski, M. Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part II. Sensors 2025, 25, 5717. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185717
Bęś P, Strzałkowski P, Górniak-Zimroz J, Szóstak M, Janiszewski M. Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part II. Sensors. 2025; 25(18):5717. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185717
Chicago/Turabian StyleBęś, Paweł, Paweł Strzałkowski, Justyna Górniak-Zimroz, Mariusz Szóstak, and Mateusz Janiszewski. 2025. "Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part II" Sensors 25, no. 18: 5717. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185717
APA StyleBęś, P., Strzałkowski, P., Górniak-Zimroz, J., Szóstak, M., & Janiszewski, M. (2025). Innovative Technologies to Improve Occupational Safety in Mining and Construction Industries—Part II. Sensors, 25(18), 5717. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185717